Court

UN Court

UN Court says Treaty Makes US Sanctions Illegal – Trump Admin. Dumps Treaty

The big news that doesn’t have the words Kavanaugh or Ford in it, is a declaration by the United Nations International Court of Justice. It claims that planned U.S. Sanctions on the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism are illegal and that they must ease them. Why? A 1955 Treaty with Iran. The Trump administration’s response. We’re terminating …

UN Court says Treaty Makes US Sanctions Illegal – Trump Admin. Dumps Treaty Read More »

Presumption of Guilt – Another Reason to Oppose The Left

Differing on matters of policy is one thing but the New Left’s presumption of guilt, at least as it applies to presumed political opponents, is despotic. It must be opposed as should be any member of the Democrat Party who condones it. From the Wall Street Journal c/o Instapundit. As Ms. Hill and Sen. Hirono …

Presumption of Guilt – Another Reason to Oppose The Left Read More »

Republicans must not cower in the face of Democratic treachery

From the very beginning, Democratic lawmakers made it clear they intended to oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court. Deeply enmeshed in the resistance movement and anti-Trump hysteria, the rationale for their opposition is clear. Kavanaugh is a conservative judge, nominated by a president they revile. Their desperation to derail his nomination was made …

Republicans must not cower in the face of Democratic treachery Read More »

Searching for Justice Frodo

It never ceases to amaze me how many people find it reasonable to think that we need to go to court to get an answer to a question like:  Can a state enact a law banning the ownership of semi-automatic rifles? Textualism says that when applying a statute or constitutional provision, we should look only …

Searching for Justice Frodo Read More »

To Where Does NH’s Policy Of Accepting Voter Fraud Lead?

New Hampshire’s policy of violating the State Constitution by letting non-residents vote here has just expanded to – non-citizens can sit as jurors in Federal cases. This is just what Judge Barbadaro concluded in this recent case, The United States of America   v.   Alfredo Gonzalez – Case No. 16-cr-162-12-PB  Opinion No. 2018 DNH 086

Iowa Supreme Court Rules Civil Forfeiture Laws Violate Fifth Amendment

From Forbes.com care of Kevin Bloom, the Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s Civil Asset Forfeiture laws violate the Fifth Amendment to the constitution. Under state law, property owners who want to reclaim their seized property must fully disclose “the nature and extent” of their interest in the property, as well as “the date, the …

Iowa Supreme Court Rules Civil Forfeiture Laws Violate Fifth Amendment Read More »