MicroGroks
Someone asked me to look into this a bit ago – another School District believing it could override the US and NH Constitution and numerous court decisions. It’s the same problem I fought for over two years and finally won in having my School Board.
Helen Joyce, writing at The Critic, has strung together some excellent thoughts on one of the most pressing issues of the day—women fighting for the right to speak freely in the shadow of the latest cultural-Marxist fad; trans-rights.
A reader sent me a clip from a John Stossel interview with Jordan Peterson. It’s a short clip, just over six minutes, but it covers two crucial points, one of which they thought might be useful to New Hampshire’s State Republican Party.
A ninth Grade Merrimack High School “English” teacher (SAU 26) gave students a sheet with some expectations for the class. It included contact information, supplies needed, a course description, and a section titled ‘Class Policies.’
Just so we’re clear (as Vodka!), my headline is hijacked from the Weekly Metro care of Jonathon Van Maren at LifeSite News, who calls it one of the most unappetizing headlines of 2021. So, many inappropriate jokes come to mind.
Whether or not HB544 passes or fails in New Hampshire, it is of serious importance that public officials familiarize themselves with the following information regarding the Constitutional right to Freedom of Conscience and Religion and the paths to preserving these rights for Americans in the face of CRT indoctrination.
The topic is the censoring of Conservative Speech even on conservative platforms (as opposed to the Big Tech platforms like Facebook and Twitter – you know, the “Mean Girls”). Disturbing – yes. Unexpected? No. Why?
Michelle Obama had her toned and beautiful arms in an uproar the other day. Ban Donald Trump from all social media. You don’t have to love Trump to see the problem. A former First Lady is calling for the blanket censorship of a political opponent. For what must be the thousandth time, are you listening?
The new House rules package uses gender-neutral pronouns and familial relationships. This is “Newspeak.” It is an effort by this totalitarian regime to limit vocabulary. Clearly they feel the need “to diminish their range of thought.” That’s what works for House Democrats.
The LGBT lobby and its adherents make sure that you understand that THEY can demand how you address them. The only proper response to this in a country that has Free Speech as an underlying pillar, is “Up Yours!”
