Canadian Province: We Can Stop Crime By Being The Criminals
If taxation is theft (it is), then what’s this? “[A] forthcoming new law that would permit the government to take away one’s property or goods prior to being charged with a crime.”
If taxation is theft (it is), then what’s this? “[A] forthcoming new law that would permit the government to take away one’s property or goods prior to being charged with a crime.”
Last week American’s for Prosperity New Hampshire published a list of legislative priorities for the Granite State in 2021. They’ve put a much-needed focus on ten pieces of legislation covering Education, Licensing, Free Speech, Asset Forfeiture, Health Care, and (believe it or not) Climate Change (sort of).
The left is committed to disarming Americans. The Democrat Majority House is pushing federal Red Flag laws that would let the police take people’s stuff on a whim. But when Republicans suggested adding known gang-bangers to any list, the Dems blocked it.
There are more things wrong with asset forfeiture than not. Browse the library on the topic if that’s not clear. But one of the most significant issues is the incentive to abuse it to pad the coffers. The more assets you seize the greater your cut. And then there’s this dirtbag.
GtokTV – Michael Boldin from the Tenth Amendment Center explains how Federal Asset Forfeiture rules allow local police departments to thwart state and local restrictions prohibiting the practice of seizing property and charging ‘it’ with a crime.
It has been 5-months since we shared the news. The Supreme Court agreed to hear an Asset Forfeiture challenge. The case will address the question of whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies to states.
New Hampshire has made great strides at the state level with regard to Asset Forfeiture. But many states, and more importantly the federal government, still engage in the practice of seizing property for themselves. A federal judge in Albuquerque, New Mexico just wrote a decision that while limited to local seizures, makes a great case for why …
Albuquerque Forfeiture Case Could Have National Implications Read More »
Back on June 8th, amidst a pile of 75 bills signed by Governor Sununu, was SB 498. An Act requiring an annual report detailing activity related to forfeiture of personal property. This bill requires the attorney general to post an annual report on the department’s website detailing activity related to forfeiture of personal property.
The Stop Asset Forfeiture folks should take note. Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided to consider Timbs v. Indiana, an important constitutional property rights case. As my co-blogger Eugene Volokh and Reason’s Damon Root explain, the case will address the question of whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies against states, as well as the federal government. If the …
SCOTUS Will Hear Case That Could Subject Asset Forfeiture to 8th Amendment Read More »
From Forbes.com care of Kevin Bloom, the Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s Civil Asset Forfeiture laws violate the Fifth Amendment to the constitution. Under state law, property owners who want to reclaim their seized property must fully disclose “the nature and extent” of their interest in the property, as well as “the date, the …
Iowa Supreme Court Rules Civil Forfeiture Laws Violate Fifth Amendment Read More »