blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
RBOBlog
RedHampshire
Rob Boyce Blog
TBONH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


Main

March 15, 2010

The Great New Hampshire Blogger Weight Loss Challenge - Week 9 results

Week 10 - whew, thought I'd be losing more ground!  Slowing down, but still going down.  Chan reports that "...With the two dinner parties I attended over the weekend I’m amazed I didn’t gain weight. But I didn’t lose any either."

Hmm, perhaps I should slyly whisper into his wife's ear "hey, take him out more often!"

 

 

Previous weeks after the jump:

Continue reading "The Great New Hampshire Blogger Weight Loss Challenge - Week 9 results" »

March 14, 2010

Yesm, I had a slight departure from blogging this weekend.....

TMEW and I had some other plans for the weekend, and during the "down time", I just couldn't summon what was needed to put ideas to fingertips (e.g., writer's block). 

S'all right though, as yesterday I spent putting my fingertips to a different purpose: we spent the afternoon and early evening at an intro level marksman class the the Belmont Firearms and Range.  We've done our share of making small holes in perfectly good pieces of paper - just didn't have it down pat how to make perfectly larger holes out of collections of smaller ones.  We've learned that it is harder, much harder, than it looks.

Well, we passed and now are much better at it at 10 & 15 yards (for me, 10 rounds in a 2" grouping three out of four mags!) - not so shabby for a couple of duffers that just started this new hobby this past fall....

February 24, 2010

Hynsie - spotlighted!

Nice write up of our friend, Pat Hynse (runs NOW!Hampshire in addition to Hynse Communications, amongst other things) in the SeacoastOnline (Portsmouth Herald et al):

Patrick Hynse

Picture from SeacoastOnline

PORTSMOUTH — Patrick Hynes didn't invent one of the social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube that have become so ubiquitous — but Hynes Communications has become a pioneer in fully utilizing social media communication for corporations, nonprofits and political campaigns.

Founded by Hynes in 2006, the company was a spin off from Portsmouth-based Calypso Communications and it has grown into one of the nation's leading public affairs agencies with a popular niche in social networking and new media outreach.

"I had been blogging for quite some time at that point and I began to recognize that there was this need for large organizations to communicate with opinion leaders online," said Hynes, who was online outreach coordinator for the 2008 presidential campaign of Republican Sen. John McCain. The company now has offices in Portsmouth and Washington, D.C., and it recently hired a social media expert to expand operations in the southeastern part of the country.

Hynes started the company with a deliberate plan to transcend traditional corporate public relations practices. "We want to help these organizations expand and adapt their communications strategies to maximize the reach of the social Web," he said. "I didn't see anyone else out there doing it the way I thought it ought to be done."

In the long scheme of things, it may have well worked out for the better that Obama won, but I am glad that the story pointed this out:

One of the most effective things the firm has done, he explained, was to put Sen. McCain on regular conference calls with bloggers during the 2008 campaign.
"It helped to give the bloggers access to a major national figure and it allowed Sen. McCain to drive his message outside the filter of the mainstream media," Hynes said.

Like McCain or not, Pat used the blogosphere in a new and innovative fashion and accomplished something that would have been impossible any other way - the "old media" or MSM had already written McCain off.  Having participated at McCain's real world Town Hall events (and he is a master of that genre) as well as the blogger calls, Pat at least had a candidate whose skills were able to be transferred to a new environment and was able to exploit two things:

  • a candidate willing to yak with lowly bloggers
  • bloggers whose interests went beyond the stale questions of the MSM reporters (who often were bored tied to a given candidate)

As as we finally know, the buzz from the blogosphere finally forced the MSM to start participating...the rest of the history is know.

Hynes believes the firm will triple in size in the next five years and become "the first choice for large organizations" who need social networking methods of communication to get the word out. The firm is already doing sub-contracting work for larger and more traditional public relations agencies.

"The social media revolution is actually in a fairly advanced state. I'm still a young man, but the communications world of my youth would not be recognizable to a person just entering the workforce today," said the 37-year-old Hynes. "This is not to say there aren't more innovations coming down the pike. In fact, the social media revolution really needs to be understood as a permanent revolution."

Congrats, Pat! 

February 18, 2010

The return of the "Jimmah Malaise" on both sides?

Blogging (for me anyways) has been kinda light this week.  Writers Block has descended; not sure about the ifs or whys, but it has been really hard to put fingers to keyboard this week.  Can't put my finger on anything in particular, just kinda overall "down" or the blahs....but I'm not the only one who thinks our political system is under attack by those that we have elected

And I was naive on both counts - first, for believing that Obama meant what he said, or that the clowns sitting in the California Legislature were capable of change...

...I feel like I'm watching all my worst predictions come true...the hollowing out of the US job markets and economy...the political and business elites ignoring the impending crises in order to cling (bitterly) to power and advantage...the reinforced 'iron rice bowl' of rent-seeking by public sector employees, politicians, and corporations - all seeking to mutually reinforce their positions on the backs of the rest of us.

It's going to stop. It'll stop when we finally gather the political will to do something about it, or else it will stop when it simply can't go on any further and crashed to the ground. I'd prefer the former...

We are led by good people who are trapped within a system that transforms them into the 'stupid and loathesome.' We need to fix that...

Armed Liberal over at WindsOfChange.net is kinda in the same boat, but worse (and yes, I insert NH for California in the first sentence - and yes, those clowns are a cut above mine in "suckitude" (I think).

You know, when both a conservative and a liberal (and yes, I admit, I am probably more of a conservative than he is a liberal) look at the sad effect of the professional political class and the hanger-ons (both individuals and corporations) that suck at the teat of the taxpayer wallet from sheer desire for more and more power and more and more rent-seeking), there's a huge problem.  I do expect some leadership, but it seems that the "professionals" are running it all off the rails...

It would be so easy, tonight, to just say "stick it" and walk away.  There's lots that TMEW and I could go do in the years still left us that just sit on the shelf because of this "obsession of mine" and the political activities out side of the blogosphere.  We could just "do our own thing" and let someone else worry about the direction of the country with an attitude of "we're past the tipping point".  After all, I've done more time in the last few years than most of the population has ever done.

But that would be quitting.  That would mean just letting the Progressives, who do not value what has been given to them by the Founders, run the table and win.  And how could I look my grandkids-to-be in the eyes and tell them "I gave up".

But when "reasonable" people from either side of the aisle think that things suck big time, it's time for one of these:

broom 

Maybe this will work just as well or better:

Gadsden Flag
Mount up...

 

February 4, 2010

Current events? Hmm, Repubs know more than Dems?

From a little Pew Research poll, I am not surprised at the results:

Pew Poll

(H/T: NRO)

Democrats keep saying that they are the "reality based community" - the question is: are they in touch with reality as well as they think they are?

Speaking of which, I still don't get it - the Dems keep blaming Bush ("and the previous 8 years") for high spending.  Know something?  I agree with him - Republicans lost not only their ways but their minds - and thus, their majorities.

Methinks that the Dems have overplayed the first and underthought the results:

Upping the ante just a day after losing their 60th Senate seat, Democrats moved Wednesday to seek a $1.9 trillion increase in the federal debt ceiling and give the Treasury adequate borrowing authority past November’s elections and into next year.
Republicans were caught off guard by the scale of the increase which follows a $290 billion short-term debt increase approved prior to Christmas. “That’s just escapism of the worst sort,” Sen. Judd Gregg (R.,N.H.) told POLITICO. But Democrats countered that their only alternative would be to give-in to a Republican strategy of forcing multiple smaller debt ceiling increases, designed to bleed them politically before November.

This perception was reinforced by a meeting Tuesday between Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). By going now with the higher $1.9 trillion target, Democrats are making a high-stakes gamble that the party can pull together once more to put the debt ceiling issue behind them for this election year.

“We have to do this. The alternative is worse,” said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D—Mont.) in a brief interview.

Right - let's not just double down but quadruple up, eh?

It looks like the most vulnerable NH CongressCritters, Carol Shea-Porter voted for this - Paul Hodes has just turned "conservative" in his bid for a Senatorial seat?

Dems - giving us the financial shaft at the national level with nary a whimper - and here in NH.

Yeah, the problem is that the chickens that will be coming home to roost for them are going to drop a BIG load of financial sorrow on us all.

Reality based?  Not "indeed"; rather "uh-oh" on steroids...

 

Debt Held By The Public

 

(H/T: Sweetness and Light)

Sorry for the light blogging - but I'll take this offer:

Sometimes, real life has to take precedence over this cyber-life and last night, I took part in my town's Deliberative session.  Here in NH, we citizens get the chance (other than participation on the official Budget Committee, Selectmen, or School Board), to actually discuss and change the budget that goes before the voters (some, right at the meeting; given that we are an "SB2" town, we will vote on the budgets via the ballot box).  Our friend Chan, from Weekend Pundit, and I chit-chatted about some of the "Warrant Aticles" as the night wore on.  A few posts will proceed from it: how citizen/lawyers decide to use the force of Government to enhance their "home values", the force of Government and Planning Boards in "distorting the Right to Private Property", and forced charity.  And, oh yeah, journalism reporting the news - NOT!

And thus, no blogging last nite.  Normal stuff will start in later on today, but let me leave this with you.

Fred Thompson tweet:

Obama's offering a payroll tax cut, but only for small business. Ok, fair's fair. We pay taxes, but only for small government. #tcot #ftrs

(H/T: Instapundit)

And this from Don Boudreaux over at Cafe Hayek - "Can I at Least Opt Out?":

The long lines at passport control and the post office, along with the indifferent “service” typically rendered there, are too common not to be symptomatic of government supply. When customers neither pay directly for what they receive nor have the option either of not paying for the product at all or of seeking an alternative supplier, government employees have little incentive to respond to the wishes of the people they are allegedly employed to serve.

 

January 18, 2010

Frequent Flier? Valuable stuff to go with you? Get a pistol!

When I fly, I ALWAYS carry pretty much all my gear with me - this is stuff I need with me on site and really can't wait for it to catch up with me if I checked it and it "got lost".  Been there, done that with just normal luggage - but if I had a hard case, I might consider this:

Another Way To Use a Gun To Protect Your Property

A suggestion from a few years ago by John Arnold, quoted with approval by security expert Bruce Schneier:

Weapons that travel MUST be in a hard case, must be declared upon check-in, and MUST BE LOCKED by a TSA official.

A “weapons” is defined as a rifle, shotgun, pistol, airgun, and STARTER PISTOL. Yes, starter pistols — those little guns that fire blanks at track and swim meets — are considered weapons...and do NOT have to be registered in any state in the United States.

I have a starter pistol for all my cases. All I have to do upon check-in is tell the airline ticket agent that I have a weapon to declare...I’m given a little card to sign, the card is put in the case, the case is given to a TSA official who takes my key and locks the case, and gives my key back to me.

That’s the procedure. The case is extra-tracked...TSA does not want to lose a weapons case. This reduces the chance of the case being lost to virtually zero.

It’s a great way to travel with camera gear...I’ve been doing this since Dec 2001 and have had no problems whatsoever.

Hope it works for you...

Can’t speak to the merits of this myself, Thanks to Opher for the pointer.

(H/T: Volokh Conspiracy)

January 4, 2010

The Great New Hampshire Blogger Weight Loss Challenge

My friend Chan (aka "DCE") over at WeekendPundit has a weekly feature called Thoughts on a Sunday" (or TOAS) where he basically does a roundup of some of the stuff he sees around the 'Net along with some commentary.  One of the items in last Friday's variant of  TOAS was this:

One of my first resolutions is to get back into fighting trim, meaning dropping back to 195 pounds where I belong. (I had no problems controlling my weight until I got married. Deb is that good a cook...and she likes using lots of pasta, something that packs weight on me faster than anything else I've ever eaten, sugar included.) I'd also fallen into the habit of snacking on things that were bad for me in so many ways. But that ended today, Deb's good cooking aside.

Silly me - I took him up on the challenge: "Betcha I can do it faster!".  His reply?  "Bring it!" and he just put up his post:

Skip of GraniteGrok and I presently weigh within a few pounds of each other and have an identical target weight. So what better way to spur each other on to drop a few pounds of pork and get back into fightin' trim than to make a contest out of it? So the first thing we did this morning is weigh in, with Skip reporting 244.4 lbs of avoir dupois. I tipped the scale at 248.3 lbs. As you can see from the graphic below, we have set a target weight of 195 lbs. (According to the height/weight charts I'm supposed to weigh around 180 pounds for my height, but the last time I hit that weight I looked like a recovering inmate from concentration camp and felt like crap all the time. I decided it wasn't in my best interest to follow the chart. I know I look and feel good at between 190 and 195 pounds, hence my target weight.)

We will update the graphic once a week, adding a second one showing what percent of the total weight we've wanted to lose.

Oy, what a way to embarrass ourselves! Alright, I'm going to add in this:  Near the top, left here on the 'Grok is a Make A Donation button - See the weight go down?  Donate!  All proceeds will go to a local food bank that Chan and I will agree upon before one of us hits 195.  I'll also add in $1 / lb to any donations received.

 

 

December 19, 2009

Saab - GM finally pulling the plug?

CNN / Money is reporting:

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- General Motors is shutting down its Swedish car brand, Saab, after attempts to close a deal with a buyer failed.

GM had announced earlier this year that it was close to reaching a deal with Swedish super-carmaker Koenigsegg. That deal fell, though.

"In the end, Koenigsegg discovered some issues they didn't think could be overcome in a timely fashion," said John Smith, GM vice president of corporate planning and alliances.

Dutch exotic carmaker Spyker then emerged as a bidder for Saab, but that deal couldn't be concluded in time, GM said.

In both cases, according to GM, issues arose during negotiations that prevented a final sale. GM executives would not say what the specific problems were, however.

"Like everybody, we would have preferred a different outcome," Smith said.

My first Saab was a 1979 99 two door.  Rode well, sounded good, loved the manual shift, and the ignition lock in between the seats next to the emergency brake.  The seats were the most comfortable I have ever sat in, too!

Miss that car...

Saab 99
 'Course, the turbo in the present one (2005 9-5 Aero) is a lot of fun, too.

October 4, 2009

OK Doug - here's your answer!

Sometimes, I just cannot help myself - Doug asked the question:

Parting thought: Does it make me a bad person to have felt an urge to celebrate when I found out Chicago DIDN'T land the '16 Olympics? Am I alone in this?

According to the Left, you certainly are a Bad Person, but this has nothing to do with it anywho.  Doug, let me clue you in - there are some on the Right that don't like you either (but for other reasons - that word "accountable" should be inserted in here somehow...).

As a reflection on the failure Chicago style machine politics, no, you are not.  When one looks at the political spoils and crony derived profits that might have been apportioned out, no, you are not.  Strengthening the hold that IL Dems have on a "one party State", that this slows down, no you are not.  When one looks at it that a few more chinks of the cult of Obama come tinkling down, no, you're not a bad guy.

Just because Obama just got a rhetorical slap in the face by the international scene with whom he promised that he'd "heal the rifts"?  Sschadenfraude for everyone! 

Right there with you, Doug (bad person, you!).

Sunday Reading

 

Here are a few things you might want to check out as you ride out your rainy Sunday...

Grant Bosse, the NH Watchdog, on the issue of free speech and Internet anonymity:

Over at Blue Hampshire, JimC is upset at the radio host Howie Carr is trying to find out the identity of an anonymous critic, and has offered a $2,000 reward.

[snip]

JimC and I had a little colloquy about anonymity and the Internet back in August, but that case involved a court order in a possible defamation case.

There is no First Amendment issue here, because there is no government involvement. Whether this case is an attack of press freedom apart from the First Amendment is a separate question, but I still don't think it rises to a threat on journalism.

Read the rest here. As you might expect, Bosse quite ably explains himself...

==================================================

Big government healthcare, DMV style? COUNT ME IN! [not]

 

[H/T Lennie J]

===================================================

From NowHampshire.com... NH GOP Chair Sununu to Republicans: Don't be polite.

New Hampshire Republican Chairman John H. Sununu urged New England Republican activists to “rub [the Democrats’] noses in every trivial issue” during a GOP forum in Rhode Island this weekend.

Sununu also told Republicans “not to be polite,” according to the Providence Journal.
“Every time they burp,” Sununu said, “we explain why that burp is bad for America.”

Sununu’s comments come at a time when partisan conflict appears to be at an all time high in the Granite State.

Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes (NH-02), who is running for Senate, recently referred to opponents of President Obama’s health care reform plan “the Flat Earth Society.” Democratic Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (NH-01) has referred to them as “tea-baggers” and has inaccurately accused Republicans of lying when they pointed out she was forcibly removed from a 2005 George W. Bush town hall meeting. A NowHampshire.com exclusive news report confirms she was removed by the local police. Shea-Porter has also falsely accused former Attorney General Kelly Ayotte of conspiring with “tea baggers” to protest a recent visit to Portsmouth.

Democratic State Chairman Ray Buckley has referred to tea party protesters as “an unhinged mob.”

.“Every time they burp,” Sununu said, “we explain why that burp is bad for America.”.“Every time they burp,” Sununu said, “we explain why that burp is bad for America.”

Yeah, Democrats. YOU SUCK!!!! STOP RUINING MY STATE AND COUNTRY!!!

Heh! We DO like this chairman, who's unafraid to take it to the Dems and liberals in an effort to stop them. [Unlike the last person in that position, Fergus Cullen, who always reserves his greatest disdain for conservatives...]

========================================

Diana West, writes in today's Washington Examiner on "how to 'lose' Afghanistan and win the war."

And what war would that be? Since 9/11, the answer to this question has eluded our leaders, but it remains the missing link to a cogent U.S. foreign policy.

It is not, as our presidents vaguely invoke, a war against "terrorism," "radicalism," or "extremism"; and it is not, as the current hearts-and-minds-obsessed Afghanistan commander calls it, "a struggle to gain the support of the [Afghan] people."

It is something more specific than presidents describe, and it is something larger than the outlines of Iraq or Afghanistan. The war that has fallen to our generation is to halt the spread of Islamic law (Shariah) in the West, whether driven by the explosive belts of violent jihad, the morality-laundering of petro-dollars, or decisive demographic shifts.

Read the entire piece here. She lays out the steps we MUST take if we're going to ultimately win this thing-- meaning the war against Sharia, not some nation-building stint in the Islamic World. What other choice do we have, but victory? The alternative is to submit... West lays out some hard realities and solutions. One wonders if our country can ever summon up the will... and the right leadership necessary to cary it out. I have my doubts.

===========================================

Parting thought: Does it make me a bad person to have felt an urge to celebrate when I found out Chicago DIDN'T land the '16 Olympics? Am I alone in this? Laughing

 

September 28, 2009

A few other NH observations...

I try to get around to some of the other NH Conservative sites from time to time - here's what they're saying"

Grant from NH Watchdog shows that sign-makers are definitely getting stim'd by Obama's ruinous spending:

In her Concord Monitor Capital Beat column, Shira Schoenberg looks at the cost of the controversial stimulus signs on New Hampshire highway projects.

According to Bill Janelle of the Department of Transportation, 22 of the state's 24 American Recovery and Reinvestment contracts originally called for signs. An 8-by-7-foot sign costs $750, including installation; and a 10-by-9 costs $1,350.

Each project was supposed to have between two and four signs. But once half the contracts were out, the state started hearing concerns about the signs. "We said hold on, don't put anymore up," Janelle said.

Now, Janelle said, larger projects like the $25 million Interstate 93 widening have signs. Smaller resurfacing projects do not.

Janelle estimates that 30 or 40 signs were put up before the state stopped. Assuming half were the larger size, that means the state has spent roughly $36,750.

Signs, signs, everywhere a sign....extolling politicians and their largesse to us using our money.  Gee, most hardworking folks just put their noses to the grindstone and work - and maybe say a bit afterwards like "oh, it's done" instead of flaunting their name(s) for every driver. Glad somebody put a stop to it - politicians deciding to self-advertising using our tax money for free advertising for themselves?

Paul from Pun Salad ends with this

If you throw in the profits of the ten largest US drug companies, another favorite whipping boy, that would buy you another seven days.

And finally, even if you were to grab all the profits from all American companies in every industry, you "wouldn't cover even five months of our health-care expenses."

Ms. Gardner doesn't like Senator Baucus's proposed legislation; neither do I, probably for very different reasons. But scapegoating private companies, and pretending all would be well if not for their "large profits" is fallacious. We need reality-based discussions on this issue; a good place to start would be to realize that there's no "free lunch" to be had by plundering private enterprises and their profits. 

Go see what started this off...but it seems like Universal Healthcare is just, financially speaking, just a dream...

Speaking of healthcare, we talked about anti-First Amendment action of Senator Baucus yesterday on the show - Paul has more here.

Take Back Orford is outraged about recent comments of NH CongressCritters Hodes and Shea "Won't apologize for 'Teabagger' usage" -Porter

The first paragraph left me a bit puzzled:

“…the point each [Hodes and Shea-Porter] stressed most was the need for more involvement and communication from citizens to their representation in Washington."

Whaaaaaaaaaaat? Are they a missing a few screws or are they walking around with huge lobotomy scars on their foreheads? I seem to remember folks SCREAMING to be heard with NO attempt from Hodes to hold a townhall . Shea-Porter is not much better, turning her back on anyone asking her a question that she didn’t want to answer, not withstanding, throwing a constituent OUT of her two (2) weasely SEIU town halls.

Read through the article further (while sitting down or else you will pass out from your blood pressure hitting a new high) as to Carol Shea-Porters defense on “citizen lack of participation”.

I agree - these two CongressClowns did all they could to keep from wrapping themselves into complete pretzels in trying to stay away from constituents!  Tele-Town Halls should be illegal here in NH - there is no way in such a venue to "seek redress" - it only allows them to slap their hands together and say "there, *I* feel better now...".

Er, 2010 is coming soon...

Continue reading "A few other NH observations..." »

September 26, 2009

Ruminations - 9/26/09

Quick thoughts (or not) from stuff I'd like to do more on but have not the time to do so...

So, how's Obama at picking a winner in the US automobile manufacturing sphere?  Not so good if this pans out:

Through August, Chrysler's sales were down 39 percent compared with the same period last year, the largest decline of any major automaker. In the critical midsize segment, which often is top-seller in the U.S. market, the company this year has sold only 34,700 of its two entries, the Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Avenger. That's only 15 percent of the 238,000 Camrys told by Toyota, the perennial leader.

If stimulus was supposed to save jobs, any boob can and should see that losing an additional 40% of sales is not the way to do it.  

What's the over / under that Fiat (Chrysler's newest owner along with we taxpayers [thanks, Obama's payoff to the UAW!] will pull an Obama and throw Obama and the UAW under the bus?

*****

There are elections going on here in NH - the big one is for Manchester (biggest city in NH) Mayor.  What's the next best way to do a "voter proxy"?  By money raised, of course!

Roy (Democrat) raised: $11,210
Spent: $5779.08
COH: $15,843

Gatsas (Republican) raised: $23,260
Spent: 25,611.75
COH: $99,221.06

I have learned that campaigns HAVE to have money to win.  But not having volunteers will put a big dent in a politician's dreams too.  I wonder when THAT will become a stat as well?  No, not the paid operatives often found in big, expensive campaigns - but the person willing to go and knock on door and put up signs and make calls.....you know, the REAL grassroots!

*****

I keep hearing that certain "journalists" are in favor of getting a bailout from the Feds.  While I agree that an informing Press is vital to a democracy and is written into the Constitution, I see NO reason why they should get a bailout - programmers aren't, so why are they so special:

But regardless of his reasoning or intentions, one thing is clear: the use of our tax dollars to bail out the newspaper industry is just one new example of a federal government that is intent on expanding its own power and reach -- all the while trampling on America’s traditional notion of capitalism and free markets. Now, that is something worth reporting. 

You know, with the majority of the "journalists" in the news rooms voting for Obama, one has to wonder if this is just yet another payback....it worked for the UAW?

*****

If you read the 'Grok regularly, you know that I'm far from being Obama's #1 fan by a long shot.  Having him, in street parlance, "run his mouth" once again (this time at the UN) and elevate himself about his country.  In my eyes, the President IS the country's Cheerleader-in-Chief and not the Apologist-in-Chief (especially when apologizing to the wrong despots for the wrong things).

*****

And I thought that the LACK of consumption lately was one of the reasons why this recession is not receding; wasn't that the whole reason for "stimulus"?  Yet another uber-liberal clown who believes your money belongs to the government instead of who earned it:

John Podesta compared the nation’s current budget crisis to the situation former President Bill Clinton faced in 1993 and said some form of a value-added tax is “more plausible today than it ever has been.”

“There’s going to have to be revenue in this budget,” said Podesta, Clinton’s former chief of staff and co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s transition team, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing today.

Someone is ignoring the TEA Parties if he thinks that rising revenues are going to safe ANY budget with Obama's name attached to it.  Hammering those in the private sector that actually create jobs with yet another ball in chain will eventually get them all kicked out of office.

Podesta said such a tax may be regressive, but can be balanced by exempting some products and using “the money to support low-wage workers.”

Just more redistributionists at work....

*****

More of THIS please!

Continue reading "Ruminations - 9/26/09" »

September 13, 2009

Ruminations - 9/13/09

You sure do:

"I have no interest in having a bill get passed that fails," Obama says for tomorrow night's broadcast. That doesn't work. You know, I intend to be President for a while and once this bill passes, I own it."

Actually, you've owned it for a while.  Just like HillaryCare, it will be forever identified with you.  Just think, two Saul Alinsky accolates have taken on the same issues - FAIL!

=====

Rich Lowry makes it easy to sound like Obama with 13 points:

1) Create a false center.
2) Scorn ideology.
3) Talk about your openness to ideas from opponents.
4) Embrace empty symbolic measures as a show of reasonableness.
5) Make lawyerly distinctions too subtle for most people to notice.
6) Say things just because they sound good.
7) Dissemble as necessary. Don't hesitate to brazen it out as needed.

Read the rest, and the additional notes that give more info.

=====

Our friend Chan gives us some reasons to why foreclosure numbers can be meaningless

=====

Our simply genius level Dems have yet another Social Engineering Program on the backs of business: mandating paid sick days.  Frankly, either Progressives either are economic Dolts, don't understand how people will game the system immediately, don't care, or (repeating the first) simply AMAZINGLY stupid.

=====

Any group that has the Acronym of WALNUTS (Workers Against Lazy Non-Producers United Together) marching in the DC parade yesterday is great in my eyes!

=====

No American Should Have To Choose Between Healthcare and Booze

Their decision SHOULD demand and enforce a "no-help" policy from society.  Life is a risk - Government was not created to socialize the costs of bad decision making by either witless or gamblers.  Trust me, people can and will learn quickly (psst: it's called the IRS rule).

=====

Did MY CongressCritters release Pressers saying that they voted for Cass Sunstein - now czar of regulation - someone who believes that government has the right to force behavior on the part of its citizenry.  Once again, are we a people that has a government, or a Government that has subjects?

=====

One of my local Progressives is repeating something that the Administration and top level Dem politicians are saying:

...our President's plan will bring stability and security...

If they were talking about the Constitutionally mandated responsibility of protecting us militarily, I'd be OK.  Of course, however, they are talking about healthcare.  Which, according to the 10th Amendment, should be in the domain of the states and not of the Feds.

The highest role of the Federal Government is the physical security of the country. Which these folks don't get.

 

 

 

Continue reading "Ruminations - 9/13/09" »

July 14, 2009

Ruminations - 07/14/09

Life is short, I've filled it with too many important things again (gotta work on that "No" thing again), so time for some short takes:

Well, they say that great nations always fall from within.  The United States spent a lot of blood and treasure fighting against Communism in the last century.  Now, the President of the United States has a Communist Czar in the White House:

Meet the Green Czar, Who Is A Red

Consistent with Barack Obama’s leftist ideology and affinity for communists — remember the man he identified as his father figure growing up was a communist who took Obama to communist party meetings, the administration has chosen a man from San Francisco to be Obama’s “green czar.”

It is probably a good thing for the green czar, Van Jones, that he won’t have to go through Senate confirmation. It turns out he’s a member of the communist party with an arrest record.

Jones himself stated in a 2005 interview his environmental activism was a means to fight for racial and class “justice,” and that he was a “rowdy black nationalist,” and a “communist.
Well, the Obama voters have only themselves to blame for opening the gates...

*****

On the Epicopal Church leader - Bishop Jefferts Schori:

The presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church called the evangelical notion that individuals can be right with God a "great Western heresy" that is behind many problems facing the church and the wider society.

Describing a United States church in crisis, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori told delegates to the group's triennial meeting July 8 in Anaheim, Calif., that the overarching connection to problems facing Episcopalians has to do with "the great Western heresy -- that we can be saved as individuals, that any of us alone can be in right relationship with God."

Once again, it seems that the Episcopal Church is hammering down on the pedal to accelerate its ongoing change from a Biblical heterodoxy of "Christ died for MY sins" to a continuation of a socialistic (group vs individual) social gospel. And continuing its headlong decline as membership is heading off the cliff.  Ask yourself - "would I be right with God if I was being measured by 'my group' by God?"

*****

More on the minimum wage boost I blogged about here:

...The unemployment rate in June for American teenagers was 24%, for black teens it was 38%, and even White House economists are predicting more job losses. So how about raising the cost of that teenage labor?  Sorry to say, but that's precisely what will happen on July 24, when the minimum wage will increase to $7.25 an hour from $6.55. The national wage floor will have increased 41% since the three-step hike was approved by the Democratic Congress in May 2007...
...a 2006 National Bureau of Economic Research paper, economists David Neumark of the University of California, Irvine, and William Wascher of the Federal Reserve Bank reviewed the voluminous literature over the past 30 years and came to two almost universally acknowledged conclusions.

First, "a sizable majority of the studies give a relatively consistent (though not always statistically significant) indication of negative employment effects." Second, "studies that focus on the least-skilled groups [i.e., teens, and welfare moms] provide relatively overwhelming evidence of stronger disemployment effects."...

Continue reading "Ruminations - 07/14/09" »

July 3, 2009

Fourth of July. Are we even worthy?

New national bird to replace Bald Eagle?

As we prepare to celebrate yet another Fourth of July, I cannot help but feel a bit melancholy as I review and contemplate the Declaration of Independence, and think about the birth of this “great experiment”, known as America. Have we reached the end of the line, as far as our belief in and adherence to the principles upon which this Nation was founded? When reading the beautiful and eloquent words as created and agreed to by the Founding Fathers, how can you not feel a sense of distance and unfamiliarity when comparing them against the realities we see today.

Consider what is unquestionably the most famous part of the Declaration:

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…”

Are there any “self evident truths” and “unalienable rights” here in the new Age of Obama, or are these things just merely quaint, outdated ideas from a bygone era? Do these words somehow mean the “Creator” gives a woman the right to “terminate” pregnancies? As she exercises “choice,” what about the unborn child’s right to “life?” President Obama has famously declared that that he wouldn’t want his young daughters “punished” with a pregnancy. So much for the unalienable right to life for his grandchildren-- Such a fine example set by our “dear leader.” What part of the Fourth does he honor?

In our supposed enlightened age, how many Americans even acknowledge some sort of “Creator,” anyway? While many claim to believe, they willingly turn a blind eye as the rights given us by the Creator are systematically stripped away—even to the point of a knowing chuckle or two at those who suggest that much of what our present government does is immoral. “What old-fashioned notions,” they say. “Don’t be so melodramatic.” One must conclude that if they actually believed in a God as a giver of rights to begin with, they would be more vehement in the defense of such. Think about that—why would a person go to the mat for something he or she doesn’t believe in?

Does “pursuing Happiness” give a person the right to the fruits of the labor of others? I suppose one could be happy with getting an extra “slice of the pie” that somebody else has paid for. But what if you happen to be the person that actually earned the “pie?” How happy will you be at the prospect of watching more and more of your just due taken and distributed to others? Is this not what’s happening on a grand scale all around America today? No matter where you look-- whether it’s the federal, state, county, or local government—it’s all the same: all are poised to take an even greater share of the fruits of our labors through taxation. They say money can’t buy happiness, but it sure does help. No matter what consists of “happiness” for a person in 2009, the fact is, it’s going to cost more.

 

Continue reading "Fourth of July. Are we even worthy?" »

June 23, 2009

Huh? They actually make stuff like this?

Living in a rural area where MOST people tend to behave themselves has some serious advantages.  That said, it deprives us of "some" stuff that may be a more common sight to our more "urban" folks - like this:

police thingamajiggy

Shhh...let's just keep this a secret between us - let's not give the local constabulary any ideas, shall we? Especially if there is more of that ARRA $$ laying around (can you say legal "conspicuous consumption"?)

(H/T: Instapundit)

June 17, 2009

Hmm, another way to look at it

With the advent of Obama's bursting onto the national scene and becoming President, Saul Alinksky's "Rules for Radicals" has gotten much play.  In every move, it seems, Obama is playing out those rules in almost every speech

Side bar: is it just me?  I didn't know one could rent that many straw men in such a short period of time.

and action.  And yes, his actions are not matching the rhetoric - there are enough dots out there to start connecting them and the resulting picture is not a pretty one.

Anyways, I ran across this and it stuck, as it seems to mesh well with an overriding sticking point of mine - the demise of self-responsibility (emphasis mine):

Running throughout “Rules for Radicals” is a whiny refusal to take personal responsibility for anything.  It is always “their” fault.

 

June 14, 2009

Sunday Reading

reading paper

Mr Obama, TEAR DOWN THESE WALLS! City walls, that is. From the London Times via Infowars.com:

Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic "shrink to survive" proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline.

The government looking at expanding a pioneering scheme in Flint, one of the poorest US cities, which involves razing entire districts and returning the land to nature. Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.

The radical experiment is the brainchild of Dan Kildee, treasurer of Genesee County, which includes Flint. Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.

Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes.

Wonder how much of this will ultimately get carried out via eminent domain? Oh, they say they won't force anybody out NOW --but who really believes what the government says, anyway? Funny how this story is basically below the radar screen of the American mainstream media...

=============================================

"Making the world safe for democracy." But who will save us from THAT? There was a reason the Founders gave us a REPUBLIC, "if we can keep it."

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Click here for a primer on the BIG differences between republics and democracies. [H/T SueP]

=============================================

For the children? From WorldNetDaily:

Family advocates are outraged by a prom held at Boston City Hall that was open to children apparently as young as 12 featuring crossdressers, homosexual heavy petting, suspected drug use and a leather-clad doorman who teaches sexual bondage classes.

Children from middle schools and high schools across Massachusetts on May 9 attended a Youth Pride Day event ending with a prom inside of Boston City Hall sponsored by the Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender Youth, or BAGLY, a group seated on the Massachusetts Commission for GLBT Youth.

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino issued a proclamation welcoming homosexual and transgender youth to the celebration.

Read the whole story here, but, be aware, it is filled with disgusting descriptions and pictures... all at Boston City Hall!

This event, billed as being for persons 22 years old or younger, is organized, promoted, and funded by ADULTS. We live in a sick, sick world, indeed. We blogged about this same annual event last year on the 'Grok, remarking that childhood at one time was about fun and innocence. Sadly, that isn't the case in our present times. This is one "tradition" that would be nice to see fall by the wayside...

=============================================

US Flag

Today is Flag Day. Find out more about the history behind the day here, here, and here.


 



June 7, 2009

Sunday Reading

reading paper

From the "every cloud has a silver lining" department, via WSJ.com:

Brígido de Jesús González lived in Queens, N.Y., for the past 20 years, working as a landscaper to support his wife and kids back in El Salvador. But with the recession clobbering his business, the illegal immigrant decided to pack up and return to his native country -- for good.

[snip]

The developed world, which for decades has offered a difficult but promising path to upward mobility, appears to be losing its allure. Unemployment is rising, and backlashes against foreign workers are mounting. The result is potentially the biggest turnaround in migration flows since the Great Depression, economists say.

I guess this means that Americans are now willing to do those jobs Americans won't do?

================================================

On the father of the global warming climate change movement, NASA's James Hansen, from the Weekly Standard:

William Gray, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University, also describes Hansen's belief in a man-made global-warming catastrophe as "almost religious" and says he "never understood how [Hansen] got such a strong voice" in the debate. Gray's efforts to predict hurricanes also lead him to question Hansen's computer models. "He doesn't have the clouds in right, and he doesn't have the deep ocean circulation," Gray says. "It's a giant scam in my view."

Yet Hansen has been well rewarded by the scientific community for his efforts, winning the American Meteorological Society's highest award for atmospheric science earlier this year. Gray says he was "appalled at that," particularly in light of the fact that Hansen wasn't even trained as a -meteorologist. Gray distributed a paper describing the choice as a "hijacking" of the AMS: "By presenting Hansen with its highest award, the AMS implies it agrees with his faulty global temperature projections and irresponsible alarmist rhetoric," Gray wrote.

[snip]

Hansen's "testimony is not working out" anyway. There's been a "slight cooling since 2001. .  .  . They're scrambling," he says. And indeed Hansen got caught with his hand in the cookie jar in 2007, when Stephen McIntyre, the man who debunked the infamous "hockey stick" graph showing stable Northern Hemisphere surface temperatures for most of the last millennia before a sharp upturn, found a flaw in Hansen's numbers. McIntyre analyzed NASA's temperature records for the last century and found that, contrary to Hansen's charts, 1998 was not the hottest year on record. That honor belongs to 1934, and five of the ten hottest years on record are now found prior to World War II.

Theon says the same kind of models that now predict runaway warming were predicting runaway cooling prior to 1975, when the popular fear was not melting ice caps but a new ice age, and "not one model predicted the cooling we've had since 1998." Spencer insists "it's all make believe--if you took one look at the assumptions that go into this, you'd laugh." But none of that seems to matter too much.

"Gore was in his corner and now the president is in his corner," Theon says. "They don't understand what the hell is going on."

Not only does this really suck, it's downright scary what these people have been able to do to our modern American society in the name of junk science. No doubt the June snowfall being reported today on Drudge is due to global warming... Just ask Jim Hansen.

=============================================

Notable quote from RightWingNews' John Hawkins, on Facebook:

European nations had problems with Bush because his policies were too pro-American. With Obama, issues crop up because he's arrogant & rude.

Obama the Snob

It makes me angry because, not only is he ruining the country, but he's so damned priggish while doing it...

=============================================

True love means never having to say you're sorry. Unfortunately, our current President feels no great love for America, and, instead, feels the need to tell everyone, "We're so sorry..." Writing at the American Daily Review, Robert Garding asks,

Where in the campaign process, did we let the candidates know, that we wanted a President, who would run around the world to our enemies, and apologize to them for what America has done?

Of course, he's reacting to the Magic Obama's latest apology tour, this time in the Islamic world.

Obama conceded at the beginning of his remarks yesterday, that tension “has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations.”

“And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear,” said the president, who recalled hearing prayer calls of “azaan” at dawn and dusk while living in Indonesia as a boy.

“Islam is not part of the problem in combatting violent extremism — it is an important part of promoting peace,” he said.

And I always thought that part of the responsibility of the President of the United States was to defend and protect the Constitution. Silly me, I had no idea. Gardin further notes

he is again, apologizing for America to a people, who do not like America in the first place. He is showing weakness to these people, by apologizing to them for something America had nothing to do with.

[snip]

I may be wrong here, but isn’t the President of the United States supposed to be overseas when he is there, showing the world what America does for other people, rather than apologizing for everything America has done, conveniently leaving out all the good that America has done over the years?

Come on Obama. America is not as bad as you make her out to be. Sure, there are flaws in her…….but for crying out loud, do we have to wait until the next president to hear something good about America come from the lips of an American president? I certainly hope not, but I am beginning to believe that we will have to ……. wait that is. Because Mr. Obama is nothing more than a powerful man, with a huge chip on his shoulder, that shows in everything the man says.

Obama.Pee Wee Herman

I'm so sorry. Yes, so very sorry I am. But I'm NOT sorry HAHAHA!

=======================================================

Obama's change

David Horowitz: Been there. Done that. This guy knows the American left, and the danger it poses to America's well being. And now, one of them occupies the Oval Office...

My parents were members of the American Communist Party and I was part of the progressive left, which was the communist left, and which has grown ominously large today, and has seen its candidate elected to the White House. I was the editor of the largest magazine of the New Left, which was organized by the children of communists, so-called red diaper babies like myself. We regarded America as the enemy. We began as an isolated political minority, but the hate America crowd has grown alarmingly in size since then. Today, nobody is embarrassed about slandering his own country even in time of war — and this includes our current president, who recently apologized for the actions of his country to Latin American communists, Jew-haters and self-declared enemies, such as Venezuela’s Chavez and Nicaraguan jefe Daniel Ortega, a degenerate who molested his own daughter.

In Obama’s presence Ortega went into a rant against America claiming that our government conducted a “terrorist” war against Nicaragua in the 1980s, when in fact American pressure forced an end to the Sandinista dictatorship and the re-institution of a free press and open elections. What was President Obama’s response to the Ortega attack? “Well, I was only six years old at the time.” In other words, an apology for our “terrorist” acts against the Marxist dictatorship. This is disgraceful and also dangerous.

On so-called "progressives:

Anybody who has ever encountered a progressive up close in any kind of political disagreement knows that this is a hate movement. They hate conservatives; they hate Republicans; they hate white males, and increasingly they hate Christians and Jews.

Indeed. All in the name of "tolerance"

 

 

May 24, 2009

Sunday Reading...

reading paper

This week's suggested Sunday reads...

Will we be witnessing a new beginning for the Golden State, or a reverse Grapes of Wrath deal? (excepting that, most likely, the modern day "Joads" won't be setting off in search of work) From the LA Times (via Facebook-- H/T Kevin):

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is proposing to completely eliminate the state’s welfare program for families, medical insurance for low-income children and Cal Grants cash assistance to college and university students.

Seems the Governator had a Road to Damascus moment after voters said NO to more taxes and will be

withdrawing a proposal to help balance the budget with billions of dollars of borrowing and replacing it with program reductions.

You know what they say... as California goes, so goes the Nation. Hopefully, "they" are right in this instance.

==================================================

Is he finally seeing the light? Said President Obama this week on C-Span:

"you have to be able to stand in somebody else's shoes and see through their eyes and get a sense of how the law might work or not work in practical day-to-day living."

Phew! Has the president opened his eyes to see the amount of pain and suffering the new Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade energy taxes will cause ordinary people-- especially ones that live in northern states needing to heat some nine months out of the year? Sadly, it isn't so. No, the president, seemingly oblivious to the crushing costs such new energy taxes will place on the middle class, had the above comments for his Supreme Court nominee... who must show what the Magic Obama calls "empathy" for the little people. Too bad it's so selective...

Read the lovingly written AP story about the anticipated Obama pick here. Did you know that this is  a "young president" and that his approach will be "methodical?" Ooooooh--Isn't President Obama simply dreamy? Yell

===================================================

As usual, Krauthammer is spot-on.

If hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, then the flip-flops on previously denounced anti-terror measures are the homage that Barack Obama pays to George Bush. Within 125 days, Obama has adopted with only minor modifications huge swaths of the entire, allegedly lawless Bush program.

Indeed. While it appears that in some instances, Obama is undoing everything and anything to do with conservative and/or Republican past practices, in some areas, not so. Because, while he won't admit it, Bush WAS right on some things. Krauthammer coined the term for the new Obama dance, and illustrates it again this week in his excellent column...

Obama three-step: (a) excoriate the Bush policy, (b) ostentatiously unveil cosmetic changes, (c) adopt the Bush policy

Obama 3 Step

================================================


And under his skin, too. Thankfully...

From Lords86 blog diary at Redstate:

Dick Cheney is in President Obama’s kitchen.

How do we know?  Because the White House scheduled a major foreign policy speech this past week for one major reason - to address the concerns about Obama’s recent decisions on GITMO and the release of interrogation memos, raised most prominently by none other than Darth Vader’s twin, Dick Cheney.

When did you ever hear of Bill Clinton feeling compelled to respond to Dan Quayle’s criticism?  Or Ronald Reagan feeling compelled to respond to Walter Mondale - before or during the 1984 campaign?

Why then respond to Dick Cheney?  Because eventually, even amateurs understand the difference between semi-pro ball and the majors.  The few adults wandering the halls of the White House know that Obama has been playing semi-pro ball for the last 4 months, catering to the whims of his far left wing electoral base.  In so doing, Obama has miserably attempted to articulate a coherent foreign policy, defined not on what it is, but on what it is not - “it isn’t the Bush Administration.”

Read the whole thing.

Have a great Sunday!!!!

 



 

 

May 19, 2009

A Letter Home From China

From Bob Bestani on business in Bejing...

map of China

[Ed. note: What does it say about China when 2 'Groksters are there at the same time for different business activities? Terry, contributor to GilfordGrok, writes of his time in China here and here.]

After nearly a quarter century of visiting China, this country never ceases to amaze. In the mid 1980s, Beijing was still a very gray and shockingly backwards city. Cars were few and far between; the landscape was flat with the tallest building being only six stories or so; rivers of bicycles flowed throughout the city; its very somber people were dressed in uniforms of gray, blue or green Mao suits. Peat was still the most commonly used fuel to heat homes, even though it cast a thick pall of smoke and haze over the entire city. Rickshaws were the taxi’s of the day.
 
Today, Beijing is a colossal international city, with countless skyscrapers and modern ten lane highways that of necessity run through and around the city to serve its 17 million people. Every make and model of car has taken over the city streets. Its citizens are very brightly dressed in all the modern designer labels, and obviously happy with the prosperity they now enjoy. Every western brand of fast food restaurants, clothes, and vendors like Lenscrafters are scattered throughout this city which seems to extend out endlessly. Greater Beijing is said to be about the size of the entire country of Belgium. What a difference a quarter of a century makes!
 
With a total population of 1.3 trillion and a historically unprecedented level of economic growth, it is easy to see how projections suggest that China will soon be the largest economy in the world. Even in recession, China continues to grow at “only” 6% per annum. The country is sitting on over $2 trillion in cash reserves which the government is spending on yet more infrastructure projects to add a stimulus to the economy. Their banks are actively lending and their shops and malls are packed.
 
But looks are deceiving; just below the surface there is a quiet sense of unease. China, like virtually every country in the world, has been hard hit by the current financial crisis. Tens of millions of jobs have been lost, causing yet another mass migration, this time back out to the countryside. The problems that China faces are immense and every bit as daunting as the rest of the world is today facing – even bigger and more complex. Their 6% growth rate is hardly sufficient to maintaining stability and social order.
 
Their problems are such that the entire system of governance that has brought them to this point is under threat. For all of our problems, President Obama and Joe Biden do not have wake up in the morning worried that the legitimacy of the Presidency is at risk. President Jiang Zemin and Vice President Hu Jintao must worry about the future of the Communist Party. For decades now, the Chinese social contract has been very simple: we will give you economic prosperity – you keep quiet about political issues. While the next few years should remain calm, the clouds are there on the horizon.
 
Consider only few of their problems:

Continue reading "A Letter Home From China" »

May 17, 2009

Sunday Reading...

reading paper

This week's suggested Sunday reads...

Dick Cheney. Unplugged, and unashamed. Writes AWR Hawkins in an excellent piece for Pajamas Media,

Cheney deserves our praise and affection, for he has  the courage of his convictions. And even at the cost of being scorned by Europeans, major newspapers, fringe leftists, and moderates in his own party, he has remained conservative and unashamed.

Indeed. As I noted in this post a long while back, the world needs more great men like Dick Cheney. AWR's piece today reminds us of this great American's record of service to our Nation. A service that goes unappreciated by too many, if you ask me...

 

===================================

short blurb by the AP reports Obama has picked Stephanie Cutter,

 a seasoned Democratic political operative to guide his Supreme Court nominee on Capitol Hill.

It further states that she

coordinated the Democrats' opposition to President George W. Bush's Supreme Court nominees John Roberts and Samuel Alito.

My question is this... Who will lead the coordinated Republican effort to oppose whoever Obama picks? Why, I'll bet the confirmation hearings will be just as "contentious" as the cabinet ones were. Oh, wait...

This is why we need more Republicans like Dick Cheney, and less like Orin Hatch and Judd Gregg. Come on boys, where's the fight?

Republicans

===================================-

Would Attorney General Ayotte give these guys a pass, too? You know, rule it "justified?"

From the Motorhome Diaries:

9:20am A second officer arrived on the scene. He immediately approached Adam and said “Get that camera out of my face!” Adam started to lower the camera and explain that “I like to hold people accountable” when the second officer ripped the video camera from Adam’s hand and roughly handcuffed him (It should be noted that the Jones County Sheriff, Alex Hodge, later acknowledged that the “video taping had nothing to do with these gentlemen being arrested and no its not illegal in Mississippi”). While this was happening Adam asked “Why are you doing this?” and the second officer replied “You’re disobeying an officer.” Pete, who was still at the front-right of Officer Atkin’s vehicle, asked “What’s going on!?” and was ordered to “Stay there!”

Read the whole thing. It's scary how helpless ordinary citizens are in the face of law enforcement willing to stretch, bend, and otherwise trample the law when they see fit. While the story above involves NH-erites in Mississippi, similar tales can be found much closer to home. Recall this one, as told here on the 'Grok...

good cop? sure

 

 

May 10, 2009

Sunday Reading...

reading paper

[UPDATE: Welcome Weirs Times readers. Yep- it's a blog. Yep-- there's a whole lotta free speech happenin' here, along with continued advocating for honest and open government. Somebody's gotta do it, afterall, since those that used to, don't anymore...Wink  Now, LIGHTEN UP! Take the Sykes comment for what it's meant: a retort to HER crudeness. Sometimes you gotta fight fire with fire...]

When you're done reading the Sunday paper (which gets thinner by the week), check out these links:

From Monica Crowley at American Daily Review...

"The numbers are just impossible. A lesser nation would have collapsed already under the weight of this spending. Next up: higher taxes (a lot of them) and hyper-inflation (a form of another massive tax)."

===================================================

Angry black woman, posing as some sort of comedienne, from Newsbusters...

"Dick Cheney, oh my God, he's a scary man, scares me to death. I tell my kids, I says, "Look, if two cars pull up, and one has a stranger, and the other car has Dick Cheney, you get in the car with the stranger."

May she choke on a chicken bone. Or a watermelon rind. Whatever gets the job done.

==================================================

Hmm. Wonder what they got on Michael Moore? From Canada Free Press...

"Fidel Castro is a genius!” gushed Jack Nicholson after a visit with the Cuban Fuhrer in 1998. “We spoke about everything,” the actor rhapsodized further. “Castro is a humanist like President Clinton. Cuba is simply a paradise!”

Jack Nicholson has been saying such things for years now. Many of his Hollywood cohorts follow suit. Francis Ford Coppola, Kevin Costner, Steven Spielberg, Woody Harrelson, Kate Moss, Naomi Campbell, Leo DiCaprio, Chevy Chase and Robert Redford, among many others, have all waxed euphoric on Castro and his island prison.

While holding up the book ”Fidel: Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant” on his TV show, Bill O’Reilly called these celebs “Hollywood pinheads.”

But there might be more to these celebrity plugs for a tyrant who jailed more of his subjects than did Hitler or Stalin than the usual celebrity vacuity upstairs.

Heh! We have a jabberjaw here in town that goes to Cuba regularly (a status symbol among the "beautiful people", apparently), and sings the praises of the "island paradise." I wonder what they got on him? Wink

====================================================

Ed, please don't give "Bariatric Bob" any more ideas. Writes Ed Mosca, on Senator Clegg's defense of Democratic-like, nay "red"-like regulatory edicts (and by "red", I'm not talking about those map colors...):

"if the ends justify the means, which is what Clegg’s argument boils down to, why stop with health insurance mandates.  Let’s tax red meat.  Better yet let’s ban it.  Think of the millions we’ll save by reducing coronary disease.  And let’s ban smoking, while we are at it.  But why stop there.  Let’s outlaw automobiles.  Think of all the injuries we won’t have to treat.  Motorcycles too.  But there is even more if we want to go down this path.  Let’s outlaw sex except for procreative purposes.  Think of all the money we’ll save by reducing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases."

To think, Clegg is one of those claiming to be among the group that will lead NH Republicans out of the wilderness.

======================================================

Could this guy be the stupidest politician ever? Writes Jennifer Rubin in Commentary's Contentions blog:

Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va), the congressman for Alexandria, Virginia, has not been without controversy. He has been forced from time to time to apologize for anti-Semitic comments and he is embroiled in the PMA Group scandal. Now he’s cheerfully welcoming the release of Guantanamo detainees into his district. Really.

 

March 22, 2009

Ruminations - 3/22/09

I generally write long - short posts are not my forte.  Problem is, there is just SO much going on all at the same time, it has been hard to keep up.  There are times when at the end of the night, and I've only put up one or two posts, I look around and see that I still have a gazillion things that I'd love to have the time to mention.  Ah, even if someone paid me to do this full time, I still probably couldn't keep up with everything at the local, state, and national levels.

So, Ruminations time again when I try to write short.  No Instapundit am I, but I'll feel better....

****

Anybody else notice that while Obama keeps talking about the economy under Clinton's tax rates (when everything was ok) and NOT about Reagan's (where the tax cuts ignited the economy)?  Nor about JFK's tax cuts (which ignited the economy)?  And Bush's (which ignited the economy)?

Nope, and you want.  It isn't about the economy; it is about control and Bigger Government

*****

Yet another Expiration Date Promise?

One of Barack Obama's most frequently repeated campaign promises was that his health care reforms would allow Americans to keep their current insurance coverage if they so desired...Like much of his campaign rhetoric, however, that pledge turns out to have been disingenuous. Last week, White House Budget Director Peter Orszag reiterated the administration's commitment to budget cuts that will force 10 million seniors off their Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and back to the more expensive and less comprehensive coverage of traditional Medicare.

...The real agenda behind the demise of MA involves the desire of Obama and his congressional accomplices to undo the market-based reforms enacted by the Bush administration. If they allow free market reform to significantly slow health care inflation while actually increasing the benefits available to seniors, their primary justification for imposing socialized medicine on the country will have been proven false. This, in turn, would rob Obama & Co. of an opportunity to exponentially increase their control over our wealth and lives. And, make no mistake about it, that's what their health care "reform" project is really about-the acquisition of more and more money and power. 

We talked about more government control over COBRA insurance yesterday on MTNP.  I had my outrage over an Obama change to healthcare, for Vets this time, here.  I was talking with Bob Mead of the POW/MIA Network yesterday - his take with respect to the Vets is that by moving the Vets cost to private insurance, it will be easier to push a uniform government plan for everyone - more of the same socialism.

*****

I vented my spleen over the AIG nonsense here - again I reiterate - when Congress decides that it can unilaterally abrogate private contracts between two willing parties and use the tax code club in an unconstitutional way, they deserve with a 90% retroactive tax against a specified class of citizens.  I kinda expect it from Dems in general, but I am not thrilled by the Republicans who cast a vote in total disregard to the Constitution that says "NO!" to Bills of Attainder.

Here's the list of Republican chuckleheads that lost their brains...

Andrew at NRO adds:

Getting people to hand over money under the threat of legislation that will take it from retroactively is pretty damn coercive. There are third-world juntas that would think twice before doing this.

*****

Victor Davis Hanson has 3 ideas of why Obama is acting the way he is:

  1. Clueless. Obama, the community organizer from Chicago with a mere two years plus in the Senate, is clueless. He has never run a business, never served as an executive, never done anything in matters of commerce other than speak and write and authorize spending bills as part of his government job.
  2. Not so clueless. Or Obama has a pretty certain, calculated European objective of high taxes, big-spending programs, utopian foreign policy initiatives, and a therapeutic sense of ensuring we are all going to be equal by result. In that sense, the recession was a godsend, since he has a brief window of about six months of fright and uncertainty to ram through programs that will last a lifetime whose expense will ensure a vast redistribution of income.
  3. A Mean streak. Or there is not so much chaos or European utopianism at work as a sort of primeval dislike of capitalists and those who have access to money 
Clueless means he can be taught.  Not clueless means we have to pray for stupidity somewhere down the line for help.  A Mean streak - we're all screwed.  Meanness attracts other bullies.

***** 

Oy voy - words fail the phrase "Big Spender Obama" - AND he keeps talking about fiscal responsibility?  Chutzpah!

Deteriorating economic conditions will cause the federal deficit to soar past $1.8 trillion this year and leave the nation wallowing in a sea of red ink far deeper than the White House had previously estimated, congressional budget analysts said today....-- $2.3 trillion more than the president predicted when he unveiled his spending plan just one month ago.

By the CBO's estimate, for example, the nation's debt would grow to 82 percent of the overall economy by 2019 under Obama's policies, compared with a pre-recession average of 40 percent. 

So...

Continue reading "Ruminations - 3/22/09" »

January 18, 2009

"Our enemies are patient, and determined to strike again..."

President Bush with military families
President George W. Bush consoles Ronald Klopf and Lisa West-Klopf, both of Aguanga, Calif., during a gathering of military support organizations Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2007. Their son, Lance Cpl. Jeromy West, was killed November of 2006 while serving with the U.S. Marines in Iraq.

Something tells me it won't be long before many people will miss President Bush. Say what you will about the guy... he has exuded nothing but class right to the end. There'll be no vandalized keyboards or stolen Air Force One china this time...

Here's the transcript of President Bush's final radio address:

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. For the last eight years, I have had the honor of speaking to the American people Saturday mornings through this radio address. In hundreds of broadcasts, I have talked to you about important issues affecting our security and our prosperity. And today, in my final address, I want to send a simple and heartfelt message: Thank you.

Eight years ago, Laura and I left our home in Texas to come to Washington. Through two terms in the White House, we have been blessed by your kind words and generous prayers. We have been inspired by those of you who reach out to feed the hungry, clothe the needy, and care for the sick. We have been moved by the courage and devotion of those of you who wear the uniform. Serving as your President has been an incredible honor.

Like every individual who has held this office before me, I have experienced setbacks. There are things I would do differently if given the chance. Yet I've always acted with the best interests of our country in mind. I have followed my conscience and done what I thought was right. You may not agree with some tough decisions I have made. But I hope you can agree that I was willing to make the tough decisions.

The decades ahead will bring more hard choices for our country, and there are some guiding principles that should shape our course. While our Nation is safer than it was seven years ago, the gravest threat to our people remains another terrorist attack. Our enemies are patient, and determined to strike again. America did nothing to seek or deserve this conflict. But we have been given solemn responsibilities, and we must meet them. We must resist complacency. We must keep our resolve. And we must never let down our guard.

At the same time, we must continue to engage the world with confidence and clear purpose. In the face of threats from abroad, it can be tempting to seek comfort by turning inward. But we must reject isolationism and its companion, protectionism. Retreating behind our borders would only invite danger. In the 21st century, security and prosperity at home depend on the expansion of liberty abroad. If America does not lead the cause of freedom, that cause will not be led.

 

Continue reading ""Our enemies are patient, and determined to strike again..."" »

November 19, 2008

Maybe this can help understand what we're up against?

conservatives tend to have a far stronger and broader moral framework than liberals.

Our friend Chan over at Weekend Pundit has one of those studies of "liberal vs conservative"; this time, with a twist: Are Conservative Beliefs Immoral?

In a 2007 paper, Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham, a couple of social justice researchers, managed to come up with an explanation. Brace yourselves: it turns out that our beliefs are immoral.

Well, at least as far as liberals are concerned. These researchers determined that "there are five psychological foundations of morality, which we label as harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity." Conservative morality is based on some combination of all five of these moral foundations. There may not be an exact 20% input from each one, but they are all present. Liberal morality is based on only the harm/care and fairness/reciprocity foundations.

Liberals are only concerned about harm/care and fairness/reciprocity. When we talk about patriotism, or respect for the country, or abortion, we are speaking from a set of morals and values that liberals simply do not see as being moral at all. In fact, liberals often believe that we have "non-moral motivations--such as selfishness, existential fear, or blind prejudice."

It doesn't surprise me, having had more than my share of run ins with more than a few modern liberals totally incapable of understanding my point of view and the beliefs that drive it. They have no concept of my morals and where they come from, nor do they wish to. Instead they blow them off, explaining them away as was done in the last sentence of the paragraph above - "selfishness, existential fear, or blind prejudice." Such condemnations must save them from having to think about their own moral and intellectual shortcomings.

So, arguing with them is like the difference between a 2-D paper person and a 3-D real person?  Well, if conservatives are using more dimensions with which to reason about something.....hmmmm

November 10, 2008

Interesting upon reflection?

From Greg Mankiw:

“President Summers asked me, didn’t I agree that, in general, economists are smarter than political scientists, and political scientists are smarter than sociologists?” [former dean Peter] Ellison told the Globe. 

And the proof?

GRE Scores
 I believe this may be true: "Scores going in do not necessarily predict later results".  However, many of us stories that go like this "HE made it into WHERE?  For WHAT?"

Like that old joke "what do you call your friend that graduated last in her class in Med School?"

 

-> "Doctor"

November 2, 2008

Daylight Savings "fall back" time.

Daylight Savings Time Ends

Bad advice.  Woke up, looked at the clock, and groaned.  Usually, The Most Esteemed Wife is very diligent about changing the clocks and timers in the house before hand.  Looked at the clock - we were late for church, so we bagged it.

Later on, I looked at the time stamp on the PC - and groaned again.  We both had goofed and could have / should have been in church.  My goof for thinking we were late!

Still, better than these guys (and am I glad!):

Back in 1999, terrorists on the daylight-saving West Bank built several time bombs, delivered to co-conspirators in Israel and scheduled to explode at a set time. Problem was, Israel had just switched back to standard time, so the only people injured were the terrorists themselves when the bomb detonated an hour earlier than they expected and killed them all.

(H/T: NRO)

I just tested the smoke detectors.  Turns out, one of the 'Grok dogs now does not like sound and started barking up a storm.

I rather like that idea....we'll have to reinforce that behavior....course, I gotta run out and get some new 9V's.

October 28, 2008

Honoring Cyrus the Great and his Charter

Cyrus the Great

Cyrus the Great

by Amil Imani

Once again October 29th is rolling around. And once again, free people all over the world celebrate the memory of Cyrus the Great, the author of mankind’s arguably greatest document, the first Charter of Human Rights. This benevolent king, ruling over a vast empire of diverse people, enshrined in the Cyrus Cylinder, nearly three millennia ago, the principles that define and protect human dignity.

Cyrus Cylinder

Cyrus Cylinder

It has been well over four years since the International Committee to Save the Archeological Sites of Pasargad initiated a massive celebration for the International Day of Cyrus the Great all over the world. For the past four years, especially, the courageous Iranian people have gathered by the tomb of Cyrus the Great, to commemorate this momentous international event, despite numerous intimidations and harassments by the agents of the Islamic Republic.

Cyrus the Great’s recognition of human rights, irrespective of any and all considerations, was instrumental in advancing the social and cultural precepts of the diverse people throughout the vast expanse of his empire. Although ethnically Persian, the benevolent king considered himself a trustee of the diverse nationalities of his kingdom. Parochialism and ethnocentrism were alien to this visionary monarch. 

In the same way that Cyrus the Great considered all people members of the same human family, the human family of today holds the great trailblazer of human rights as one of its own. The vast plateau that is the presently encompasses Iran has been inhabited by the most diverse people of any region of the planet. Yet, in adherence to the lofty principles of Cyrus, these people found unity in diversity. They remained loyal to their own unique heritage and successfully linked it to a larger loyalty. The present Iran is a living testimony to this remarkable togetherness where ethnic Persians, Turkic, Kurds, Lurs, Turkmen, Baluchis, Arabs, and others live as one people.

Cyrus’ Charter of Human Rights is the first written document which stipulates that all humans have universal inalienable rights, without regard to any and all demographic considerations such as ethnicity, nationality and religion.

 

Continue reading "Honoring Cyrus the Great and his Charter" »

October 7, 2008

Pirates, Russian tanks, and an attitude

Well, piracy has been come more and more prevalent off the coast of that failed nation-state, Somali.  Working from speedboats launched from "mother ships", they have been attacking shipping now for years. 

This, I think, is now getting them noticed:

Hijacker Somali Pirates: We'll Fight to the Death Before Surrendering to U.S., Russia 

My first thought was "and this is a problem....why"? 

Let's give them what they want?  You steal a freighter containing 33 Russian battle tanks, and you will get folks attention.  My concern is, of course, is for the captive crew.  These tinpot dufuses that believe they will out stare the US and Russia may soon get what they want.  No, not from the US - but Russians have a habit of once being crossed like this, shaming them before the world, they may well not be convinced that the crew has a high value but sending a message to others that steal their stuff is.

Rest of the story after the jump.

Continue reading "Pirates, Russian tanks, and an attitude" »

September 14, 2008

Band of brothers... "Law? Fine for thee, but not for me..."

good cop? sure

How many times have you heard someone say this?

"If you get in an accident, and you know you've been drinking, go someplace close by and, in view of many witnesses, proclaim how distraught you are from the event and pound several stiff drinks. THEN, go back to the scene."

And of course, the thought being that, at best, the cops can charge you with leaving the scene of an accident and you'll get off of a sure DWI charge. But, does anybody actually know anybody that has successfully gotten away with such a scheme?

Then there's the trick of rescheduling court dates at the last minute in the hope that the arresting officer will be a no-show, and you'll get off due to that technicality.

Again, despite many prayers and wishes for such luck helping the accused, the reality is that it really doesn't happen all that often... Unless, of course, you're a member of the law enforcement community. Then, all bets are off...

The proof was in the lead story in the September 13 NH Union Leader:

Police Officer Benjamin Beauchemin never lost his driving privileges, despite refusing a Breathalyzer sobriety test after an off-duty car crash last spring.

Beauchemin instead fought to keep his license at a state motor vehicle hearing and prevailed on a technicality when the investigating state trooper failed to show up, apparently because of a court conflict.

See? How fortunate for Officer Beauchemin that a fellow cop somehow just couldn't make it for his hearing. How many times does that happen when it's just an ordinary citizen?

At a rehearing, Trooper Nick Cyr's reason for missing the Beauchemin hearing was deemed insufficient to reopen the case, allowing Beauchemin to keep his license, Curtis Duclos, hearings administrator for the state Department of Safety, said yesterday.

Beauchemin this week was found not guilty in Candia District Court on a driving while intoxicated charge from the May 11 crash.

Beautiful, isn't it? And here's the rest of the story:

Beauchemin has admitted to having one beer before the crash.

He also has said he left the scene of the crash to go to his girlfriend's home, two doors down from the site, where he had four more to calm his nerves.

He later returned to the crash scene, where court records show he refused the sobriety test.

Does anybody think that the above scenario would have happened were Beauchemin just an ordinary, unpriviledged citizen? How much legal expenses were incured on this? Again, Joe Sixpack, in most instances cannot afford the astronomical costs necessary to properly fight a DWI charge. In this story, with Beauchemin's brothers in the law enforcement and other NH gov't communities doing their part for him, it most likely didn't cost him much more than what can be earned back in a few hours of "detail work."

"To Protect and Serve"

(one another, that is...)

When it's ordinary folks, this, this, and this is the normal procedure. Wake up NH!!! The "Live Free or Die" state is rapidly becoming the "Police State". I don't understand how a people that rejects REAL ID as too intrusive on freedom and privacy then turns around and allows the police to get away with what they do here in the Granite State.

NH cop wear..roadblock

 

 

July 22, 2008

Short takes...

Dems

When is a poll not to be taken seriously? Why, when it doesn't show the results you wished for...

*                *                *

chicoms

The Hegemon rises... Gordon G. Chang writes,

The Chinese have always threatened neighbors in order to enforce their outsized territorial claims. Now, it is threatening an American firm. It’s time for Washington to defend every nation’s right of passage-and the interests of its own businesses.

I believe we maintain carrier strike groups for this very purpose.

Will China overtake us? When looked at in some ways, the question is "How could they NOT?"

*                *                *

IB

To those that claim the newest fad to hit NH in education, the International Baccalaureate Programme, is all about education, I say look at the facts. This posting, by a writer who is in FAVOR of IB, glowingly reports of its main raison d'etre:

The IB combines high academic standards with a powerful humanist purpose. Its mission statement speaks of developing “inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect.”

"But Doug--It'll also help our kids be more competititve when it comes to getting into college. Sure, maybe they teach peace and all that, but surely it's a small piece of the overall programme." Maybe you think so, but that's not how the cheerleader/blogger views it:

Because the IB’s mission is centered on changing the world, it is constantly learning and changing itself.

See? And you thought your kids were going to school to learn readin', writin', and 'rithmetic...

*                *                *

hostages

We're not really going to give the Iranians another bite at the apple, are we? Max Boot on the crazy notion of an American Interest section in Tehran:

who can ever doubt that the current Iranian regime, which is exactly the same regime that presided over the barbaric seizure of our personnel during the Carter administration, is capable of such acts in the future?

And the news in today's papers tells us that engaging in diplomatic talks with the Iranians is nothing more than a joke, anyway...

July 16, 2008

Ruminations - 7/15/08

I'm tired.  Too much going on.  Just random thought from surfing...

=============

Nice word - Nestapo!  Nanny State Police!  Love the word - it brings forth just the right amount of snark towards these  busybodies that have nothing better to do (especially elected politicians) that haven't grown up enough to leave the rest of us alone.

Somebody ought to inform the EPA of the word "Nestapo".  Going after lawnmowers? And may start regulating speed on the highways - more speed, more CO2? ("...vehicle speed is the single largest operational factor affecting CO2 emissions from large trucks,” and that “every mph increase above 55 mph increases CO2 emissions by more than 1%.” The ANPR puts speed limiters on large trucks on the table as a means of reducing carbon dioxide...").  So much for the Dept. of Transportation...

*****

Comedians don't find Obama funny.  Our pal John at RWN solves the problem:

Obama IS Frank Burns
Yup, Major Frank Burns

What makes this so delicious is that most of his supporters are too young to understand the joke.

*****

Change I can believe in (Erick at RedState):

Barack Obama Purges His Website. No Longer Critical of the Surge.

When the situation in Iraq was going badly, Barack Obama wanted us to retreat. When the surge took hold and the situation in Iraq improved, Barack Obama wanted us to retreat. No turn in Iraq went unstoned in Obama's commitment to retreat and surrender.

Not any more. Obama has thrown his old positions under the bus. And, for a guy whose campaign claims to get the net, he's done an extremely dumb thing -- he purged his website of his former positions. Apparently he's never heard of a cache.

Just like with Kerry, I can hear those summer time shoes a-movin': flip-flop, flip-flop

*****

This is going to hurt:

Until recently, the impact of Title IX, the law forbidding sexual discrimination in education, has been limited mostly to sports. But now, under pressure from Congress, some federal agencies have quietly picked a new target: science

As in quotas in college.  Title IX, while helping women in a positive way, has also wrecked havoc on men's sports.  Might this be the feminists ultimate revenge?  Or just pour our nation down the toilet?  After all, in sports, there are only so many slots that can be filled with scholarships.  Now, they want to turn away men with money who want to pay to study subjects?  

So far, these Title IX compliance reviews haven’t had much visible impact on campuses beyond inspiring a few complaints from faculty members. (The journal Science quoted Amber Miller, a physicist at Columbia, as calling her interview “a complete waste of time.”) But some critics fear that the process could lead to a quota system that could seriously hurt scientific research and do more harm than good for women.

*****

Betsy's Page:

We've all heard humorless America-haters promote themselves by announcing, As Thomas Jefferson said, "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."

Continue reading "Ruminations - 7/15/08" »

June 11, 2008

"The Prince" and "The Prince of Providence"

Buddy C.

"Buddy C"

I know this has little to nothing to do with anything here in the Granite State, but I figured I'd note it anyway, as it involves one of the most interesting and colorful politicians to ever hit the scene. From the RI Film & TV Office

PLEASE WELCOME THE PRINCE OF PROVIDENCE

Please join Rhode Island native and renowned Director/Producer Michael Corrente and representatives from the Rhode Island Film & TV Office and the Providence Mayor's Dept. of Art, Culture and Tourism at 3PM on Thursday, June 12, 2008 at the Soldier's and Sailor's Monument in Kennedy Plaza facing Providence City Hall, as Mr. Corrente announces plans for filming his long-awaited political biopic THE PRINCE OF PROVIDENCE.  

The cast includes Dermot Mulroney, Adam Goldberg, Bradley Cooper, Ed Burns and Oliver Platt, who will portray former Providence Mayor Vincent "Buddy" Cianci in the David Mamet adapted screenplay of Michael Stanton's 2003 book about one of America's longest-serving mayors.  Robin Williams is currently in negotiations to join this talented group of actors. 

"The passion I have for THE PRINCE OF PROVIDENCE is stronger then any film I've made to date. Through much scrutiny and speculation, I've spent six long years preparing for this picture. I have painstakingly taken the necessary time to make sure that all my ducks are in a row. This is my home state, and I have an obligation to ensure that the quality of the production matches the brilliance of the material. At the end of the day, and every day does end, nobody ever cares about how long it takes to make a movie; they only care if it's good", stated Mr. Corrente.

I have not read Mr. Stanton's book about the Mayor, but I did read another book about a prince. In fact, the name is just that: The Prince, written by Niccolo Machiavelli many centuries before Mayor Vincent "Buddy" Cianci arrived on the scene. And yet, based on my recollection of the years I lived in Rhode Island, and what I've heard since I left, one can almost imagine the infamous master political observer would certainly find a degree of familiarity with Providence's very own "prince". 

Writes Machiavelli in The Prince,

 

Continue reading " "The Prince" and "The Prince of Providence"" »

April 5, 2008

Who will join Congressman McCotter in telling President Bush to stay home?

China brutality

Chicoms

Earlier today on our radio program, Michigan Congressman Thadeus McCotter discussed why he doesn't think President Bush should go to the Beijing Olympics, stating

We don't think that the president, for the first time in US history should attend a foreign hosted Olympics because... his presence at the Games has deviated from the norm and set a political gesture into the Olympics.

In a letter to the president last September, Congressman McCotter wrote that in light of a long list of

the communist dictatorship's rogue actions against our nation and others, your attending these games in communist China will subvert the moral authority of your position as the Leader of the Free World-- a Free World which will be watching and weighing your participation.

To that end, he has filed legislation in Congress which, according to his website, is 

"a bill in Congress restricting all government officials and employees from attending the opening ceremonies of the 2008 Beijing Olympics in communist China. The bill does NOT affect America’s Olympic athletes. The bill H.R. 5668, The Communist Chinese Olympic Accountability Act, is a follow up to a September 11, 2007, letter to President George W. Bush in which Congressman McCotter and a bi-partisan coalition of Members of Congress, state: 'We urge you [President Bush] to reconsider your decision to attend the 2008 Beijing Olympics in communist China.'"

This is a great idea, in that it allows the athletes to participate in the games without becoming political pawns, while at the same time sends a message that we are not going to accept a rival system of government that seeks to undermine ours through deception and espionage while trampling the human rights of its citizens in ways not tolerated elsewhere in the civilized world.

You would think President Bush would know better than to even consider such a trip, especially given the the violence in Tibet and elsewhere that's recently been all over the news.

I challenge New Hampshire's two Congressional Representatives, Democrats Shea-Porter and Hodes, to step up and join Congressman McCotter in his effort to stop President Bush from making a huge mistake.

How about it? Will the two of you support HR 5668? I wonder what the variaous candidates running for Congress this fall think? Albeit, it will be over before they get to Congress, but I'd still like to know how they would vote. This is a fantastic way to send a huge message without punishing a single athlete.

 

November 21, 2007

Some things should never, ever be checked

I don't travel all that much anymore, but I used to - was a Premier Exec in United's frequent flier program for years.  Now, I may not be the brightest bulb in the lot, but this is one thing I would never have tried to make it easier in the cabin:

Family's Laptop Missing From Checked Luggage

Ugh!  For me, this is akin to sneaking a ride in the nose wheel of the jet - never to be tried!  Now, I realize that I may have a tad more experience in riding in planes and bringing stuff with me (too  much too often) but what thinking person would ever think of putting something both expensive and BREAKABLE in a suitcase or duffel bag?  And then letting it be stuffed in the bottom of a plane, often with lots of other suitcases on top of it with handling not to be described with the words 'white kid gloves" in the same sentence?

MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) ― Each day this holiday weekend more than 100,000 people will travel through Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and most of them will check baggage.
Most people expect their stuff to make it safely to the destination but for one Minnesota family that didn't happen. Somewhere between check-in at MSP and luggage pickup on the other end their brand new laptop disappeared.
For the Dillons of Edina, Minn. it was supposed to be the perfect vacation for this family of seven. When you travel with five kids it's usually easier to check as much luggage as possible.
"My carry on bag wasn't big enough," said 14-year-old Samantha Dillon. So she checked her new laptop in her suitcase. When she got to San Diego it was gone.

Now, this is a young teenager - I'll cut her some slack...but what about her Dad or Mom?  Egad, a laptop is generally a valued item - WHY would they allow her to put it in th bag? My carry-on bag IS my computer bag and when I have to use the RJs, I know it doesn't fit either overhead or under the seat in front of me.....I carry a sleeve to make sure that breakable electronics stay with ME! 

Note to infrequent travelers - look out the window just after you have boarded and just WATCH how your luggage is treated!  You quickly will adopt new attitudes towards packing..... 

"I thought someone might have stolen it at the airport maybe," she said.
In her suitcase was a notice from the Transportation Safety Administration. Agents had opened her bag and searched it so Samantha's father immediately called them.

Continue reading "Some things should never, ever be checked" »

Talking Turkey

This is a helpful bit of advice from my wife on how to cook turkey for a turkey like me. After years of loathing these occasional dinners, my better half discovered the cure. I figured this would be better to post BEFORE Thanksgiving Day itself in case you might want to give this a whirl. From Gigi:
My favorite method for turkey is to cook the bird upside down . It makes the whole thing so moist-- with no basting required.
  • Prep your tukey with spice and rub with butter and olive oil.
  • Place quartered apples, oranges, onions, carrots and celery in the cavity. You may use just the fruit or just vegetables. This provides flavor and moisture from within, steaming all the while it cooks.
  • Close cavity up and place the bird upside down in a deep turkey pan and cover. Cook in the oven for desired time depending on the size of your bird.
  • Allow to rest for 20 minutes, then remove very carefully. The meat will pull off the bone (Unless it falls off on its own, as it most likely will do. Mmmm!). If you want the skin to be crispy you may flip your tukey over for the last 20 minutes-- although, this could be difficult, due to the fact the meat might fall from the bone, as noted above.
              Enjoy!
This is a great recipe for the non turkey lovers, my husband does not like turkey but enjoys this meal every year. Thanksgiving has always been a special time with our children to reflect on the many blessings in our lives.
.
Traditional Thanksgiving
.
In the Lords Prayer we ask the Lord to “give us this day our daily bread.” Every day we have food to eat is itself a blessing from the God. So take this time to thank Him for each and every day. "This is the day the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad!"

November 16, 2007

He's baaaack!

Howie Carr
.
Howie Carr will be back on the radio today! This is what WRKO had to say yesterday:

BOSTON, MA (November 15, 2007) – Boston’s Talk Station, WRKO AM 680 and Howie Carr announced today that he will return to his afternoon drive-time show on Friday, November 16.

"We are thrilled that Howie is back on WRKO," said Entercom New England Vice President and Market Manager Julie Kahn. "Howie is a one-of-a-kind talent, and I’m sure all of Howie’s listeners are looking forward to hearing him on our air again."

Carr returns to his 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. slot, where he gives his inimitable take on local and national politics and current events. Carr’s contract runs through 2012.

"I'm very happy to be reunited with my loyal listeners on WRKO. I said I'd be back on the air before Imus and now I am!"

Talk about a long vacation! Since the beginning of July, the wit and wisdom of Howie has been AWOL, and it was beginning to look like we weren't going to get to hear him ever again. As I reported in this post in July,

Searching for some more info on the matter, I found this detailed story from the Boston Phoenix. Apparently, there's a lot more than meets the eye. And it turns out, the divorce between Carr and RKO might be a rocky one. Writes Adam Reilly:
Howie Carr’s jump from WRKO-AM (680) to WTKK-FM (96.9) isn’t a done deal just yet. Carr’s new morning drive-time show is supposed to begin in October. But after the Herald reported this past Monday that Carr was poised to bolt WRKO, station spokesman George Regan released a statement hinting that WRKO might take legal steps aimed at keeping Carr from leaving — or, barring that, at making his exit as unpleasant as possible.
Wanna guess who won?
(H/T: Steve-- official radio monitor of the 'Grok)

November 5, 2007

A glimpse from B.C. (Before China)

This past weekend brought the annual "sucking of the leaves" ritual at the Lambert homestead/bunker here in Central NH. My wife took this shot of yours truly proudly perched upon my Dad's Wheelhorse complete with the EZ-Rake vacuum machine in action-- simultaneously mowing and sucking leaves, grass, sticks and apples. Why do I put this picture up? Because every year at this time, I phone Dad and I'll make some crack about "wanting my money back for this old piece of crap-- it took THREE PULLS TO START!" Then we'll both laugh. Dad bought the tractor with attachments, near as we can recall, when I was between 6 and 8 years of age, thus making it somewhere in the vicinity of 35 or so years old. The main point stressed is that this rig was 100% completely made in the USA.
.
Wheelhorse
.
Does it sometimes break? Of course. Amazingly, so far, every part I have ever needed on the tractor, including the mower deck was still available for purchase. I'm not sure about the vac portion, because it has never really broken, other than needing a few weld repairs or a new gas tank. With a simple set of tools (no metric needed!), and an accompanying grasp of basic mechanics, these old devices will probably run for another 35+ years.
.
All of this came from that magic time when EVERYTHING was made in America. Back when China was nothing more than some place with a Great Wall and handy takeout...

October 26, 2007

Talk Radio

Here's a shameless plug...I'm substitute co-hosting the morning show starting today from 6-9 am through next Friday on wntk.com out of New London.

It's live streamed so check it out if you can't get it on 97.7 fm. Call in number is 888-299-3151.

Fergus Cullen is on from 7:35-7:45 am this morning. He'll be talking about the RNC's executive committee recommendation to strip half of NH's delegates at the convention.

Go Sox, eh?  

 

October 8, 2007

Least Favorite People on the Right

Yuckie Face
.
Our buddy John Hawkins of RightWingNews and the Conservative Grapevine (and frequent MTNP guest) likes to poll so-called "right-of-center" bloggers about various questions or who they like/dislike in particular categories. This time he asked them to send a list of 12 persons they considered to be their "Least Favorite People On The Right." As is often the case, GraniteGrok participated along with nearly fifty other bloggers. Click here to see the list as compiled. This is the list I submitted, complete with comments added as it was created:
    • Pat Robertson
    • Pat Buchanan (I can't believe I'm saying this)
    • Chuck Hagel
    • Joe Scarborough
    • Mitt Romney
    • Arlen Specter
    • Colin Powell ( a plant, no doubt, for the left)
    • Andrew Sullivan (is he on the right at all?)
    • John McLaughlin (this one pains me too)
    • Trent Lott
    • Tucker Carlson
    • William Cohen (actually, all "Republicans" from Maine, now that I think about it-- Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins)
As you can see when comparing my list with John's full results, I am not alone in my dislike of certain people. Then again, some of those responding have listed some of my FAVORITES of the right as well. Such is the non-comformity of the "right" side of thought...
.
[Feel free to submit YOUR list in the comments section.]
.

October 2, 2007

Solution Day Debriefing. Report from Hampstead.

problem solving
.
Our friend Jorge Mesa Tejada forwarded his report on the American Solutions lab held Saturday in Hampstead, NH. Local people discussing important issues of the day and exploring solutions and ways of working with government to improve our collective lot as Americans. What a concept! As we reported on the event we hosted here in Laconia, the grass roots enthusiasm is alive and well. We just need to find one another and get organized. Thanks to Newt Gingrich's innovative project, we now have the means and tools to make that happen.
They came from Hopkinton, Derry, Windham, Sandown, Freemont, Plaistow, Kingston, Exeter and Florida to join Hampstead‘s residents for the American Solutions Day workshops at the Hampstead Middle School.
.
Forty-six attendees—42 registered and 4 who chose not to register—were in the room when the meeting convened at 12:55 PM.  What we lacked in numbers was more than made up by the enthusiasm and stimulating discussions of the participants.
.
After welcoming remarks and some administrative details by host Jorge Mesa-Tejada, moderator Peter Bearse opened the meeting at 1:00 PM with Newt’s introduction.  The attendees raptly listened and utterances of “YES!!” and “Right on!!” were heard during Newt’s 30-minute introductory remarks.
.
The group overwhelmingly chose illegal Immigration as the first topic of discussion.  The common feeling was that Washington had surrendered border and immigration control to world politics because there are existing laws and tools to handle the situation. What is lacking is the will to use and enforce them.
.
The consensus to fix the problem was that we should 1) enforce the existing laws, 2) close the border, 3) develop a secure Social Security Card with photo [NOT a national ID card] and 3) hold employers directly accountable for hiring illegal immigrants with concomitant severe penalties leading to closing the business after three convictions.
.
The topic for the second session led to a spirited discussion because some were in favor of the flat tax and others favored the fair tax.  After an explanation of the differences, the fair tax won.  Even then, the subsequent brainstorming showed certain reticence about imposing a fair tax and not some kind of income tax. The main argument was that it would really affect the poor. In the end, there was overwhelming support for the institution of a fair tax over a flat tax.  The concern then turned as to doubts that the powers that be would allow it to become law.  It was pointed out that that was precisely where we, activists, came in—one here, one there until there was a veritable army behind it.

Continue reading "Solution Day Debriefing. Report from Hampstead." »

September 19, 2007

Ruminations - 9/19/08

Thoughts as solid as the Granite upon which they were thought....

**************************

 

Just like what I posted yesterday, some protected classes of folks get to talk in ways (and get away with it) that I cannot.  Once again, thanks to Political Correctness and rascism.  Jesse Jackson went after Barack Obama.  Why?

Jesse Jackson sharply criticized presidential hopeful and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for “acting like he’s white”  according to The Associated Press.  

Let's keep that "is he black enough" meme going, eh Jesse? Imagine if I said that... 

**************************

"You know, you look back over our history, and it doesn't take you long to realize that our people have shed more blood for other people's liberty than any other combination of nations in the history of the world.'' - Fred Thompon  9/7/07

Operative word - other

The folks over at the Washington Post can't listen well, it seems.  They totaled up our casualties over the decades defending others: 623,288.  They tried to claim that the 8 million lost in WWII by the Soviets were, in part, to "liberate" Western Europe from the Nazis. 

Right....and then they spent spent the next few decades trying to take over.  That's "liberating"?

Thompson's jingoistic assertion cannot be supported by facts, barring some tortuous definition of the phrase "other people's liberty."

Journalists....please try learning history before twisting it....and trying a take down in doing so.  Jingoistic - showing a bit of a bias, eh? 

News to WaPo - Most Americans and I want someone who is proud of the US to be the US President!

More after the jump 

**************************

Continue reading "Ruminations - 9/19/08" »

August 30, 2007

Announcing the GraniteGrok reader survey results: NH's Power Players

megaphone
.
The long-anticipated day has arrived. Surely everybody who's anybody is already looking at the results, wondering if they were fortunate enough to make our list. Our sincere apologies to those of you who have fallen short on your sleep, nervous in the anxiety of whether or not you've made the list. Worry no more, for the time is now!
.
Our thanks to all of you who took the time to participate. While some of these types of exercises tend to mainly be about promoting the person conducting the survey, rest assured this was not the case here. Watching the recent turns of political events here in NH, it is quite obvious that power has shifted. Those who used to acquire and wield strength in the Granite State are either gone, or in their waning moments. A new crop of shakers and movers is beginning to make their marks on the NH scene. We thought it was time to update the list, and, while having thoughts ourselves, we thought we should get as much input from other people, in case it turned out we were all wet.
.
The way it worked was simple-- I asked readers to submit a list of 5 people who they thought were the new power players in NH; who are the most influential in today's Granite state. I then listed all of the answers and then ranked them according to total votes cast for each. The goal was to create a list of twenty people that GraniteGrok readers felt fit the bill.
.

Continue reading "Announcing the GraniteGrok reader survey results: NH's Power Players" »

August 29, 2007

Last Day! Help Pick NH's Power Players

question mark
.

Attention New Hampshire GraniteGrok readers... We need your help!

.
We find ourselves in the midst of a seemingly large transformation here in the Granite State. With Democrats controlling all of the levers of state government for the first time in most peoples' lifetimes and national media organs calling NH a "blue state", one cannot deny that times are a changin'. With these changes, comes many new faces as well. Persons who once were able to sway the entire state with every utterance now find themselves nearly irrelevant. (Richard Flynn, anyone?)
.
Nature abhors a vacuum, as we know, and as yesterday's "important" characters fall by the wayside, a new cast eagerly lines up to fill the voids.

QUESTION: Who are the NEW power players here in New Hampshire? Who are the most influential in today's Granite State?

We're asking our regular readers to help us compile a list of the Twenty Most Influential Granite Staters, which we will then report here on the 'Grok. The way it will work is this: Send an email with "NH Power Players" in the subject line to doug (at) granitegrok (dot) com as follows: List up to 5 Granite Staters of your choosing, and a brief writeup of why you perceive each to be of statewide importance. If you don't wish to vote via email, feel free to place your votes below in the comment section. We will tally the "votes" from now until Wednesday, August 29. On Thursday, we will put up a post with the list. We will include some reader comments with each winner. If you wish to remain anonymous, just say so in the email and we will respect that-- but please don't hesitate to participate.
.
NH is changing. Who do YOU think will have a role in shaping its future? Oh, and this is a non-partisan deal. I would say that, for example, former NH Dem Party Chair Kathleen Sullivan could be on my list, along with current Chair Ray Buckley.

August 28, 2007

The most law abiding are always penalized the most

I had seen this post over at the Belmont Club last week and it just wouldn't let go.  No, it wasn't the subject matter: WTO and the case of Antigua vs the US.  Stuff of international trade, while of more interest as I better understand how the world actually works, is not stirring stuff - at least not to this blogger.

However, there were a couple of sections that did grab my attention as they made a lot of sense.  Wrongly, but made sense:

Where have we seen this before? Pretty much everywhere. While not exactly the same, the Antigua decision has structural similarities to the way some international lawyers think about the Geneva Convention and human rights legislation. The US is "bound" by the letter of the law, and if a terrorist mass murderer can find a legal loophole to escape then he is "entitled" to use it. But the Convention is not obeyed by weaker parties because it is impractical to enforce it. Just as pirated DVDs can be found being openly sold in many street corners in Asia without being similarly available in places like Australia, countries with well-functioning legal systems find themselves at a disadvantage compared to countries with no enforcement. In the area of human rights, for example, America has courts before which lawyers can appear. Al-Qaeda has a cave in Pakistan where accommodations are notoriously poor. The US will obey a legal judgment. Legal judgments against al-Qaeda are an exercise in futility. Who will lawyers sue? Under these conditions the full weight of international law will always come down hardest on the most law-abiding.

[snip]

The power disparity between countries like the United States and other countries is offset by the disparity in expectations of compliance. It would be considered natural for Khalid Sheik Mohammed to ask for his "rights" under international law, but an American soldier captured by al-Qaeda can hardly make the same request -- unless he wants to kill his captors with laughter -- which might be a violation of the Geneva Conventions itself.

I taught my kids (at least I tried) that taking the "high road" was the right thing to do; the better morality.  Sure, it is hard and often not as profitable in the way that many account for profit.  I try (though not always attain) that ideal.  For me, the higher road is its higher reward.  But I also know that many do not share this sentiment.  But as with most things, when folks who try to take that high road fail, ridicule and scorn are soon to follow.

However we play it, we have to remember one thing - morality is for humans - not countries.  Countries have self-interests and self-inflicted manners of behavior (or, as it seems, none at all).  

I guess the moral of the story here is that perhaps expectations need to rise for those that choose to not follow the high road.... 

August 26, 2007

Don't forget... Pick your NH Power Player

question mark
.

Attention New Hampshire GraniteGrok readers... We need your help!

.
We find ourselves in the midst of a seemingly large transformation here in the Granite State. With Democrats controlling all of the levers of state government for the first time in most peoples' lifetimes and national media organs calling NH a "blue state", one cannot deny that times are a changin'. With these changes, comes many new faces as well. Persons who once were able to sway the entire state with every utterance now find themselves nearly irrelevant. (Richard Flynn, anyone?)
.
Nature abhors a vacuum, as we know, and as yesterday's "important" characters fall by the wayside, a new cast eagerly lines up to fill the voids.

QUESTION: Who are the NEW power players here in New Hampshire? Who are the most influential in today's Granite State?

We're asking our regular readers to help us compile a list of the Twenty Most Influential Granite Staters, which we will then report here on the 'Grok. The way it will work is this: Send an email with "NH Power Players" in the subject line to doug (at) granitegrok (dot) com as follows: List up to 5 Granite Staters of your choosing, and a brief writeup of why you perceive each to be of statewide importance. Feel free to place your votes below in the comment section, but keep in mind that the list will be compiled ONLY from the email votes cast. We will tally the "votes" from now until Wednesday, August 29. On Thursday, we will put up a post with the list. We will include some reader comments with each winner. If you wish to remain anonymous, just say so in the email and we will respect that-- but please don't hesitate to participate.
.
NH is changing. Who do YOU think will have a role in shaping its future? Oh, and this is a non-partisan deal. I would say that, for example, former NH Dem Party Chair Kathleen Sullivan would be on my list, along with current Chair Ray Buckley.

August 22, 2007

GraniteGrok Reader Survey

question mark
.

Attention New Hampshire GraniteGrok readers... We need your help!

.
We find ourselves in the midst of a seemingly large transformation here in the Granite State. With Democrats controlling all of the levers of state government for the first time in most peoples' lifetimes and national media organs calling NH a "blue state", one cannot deny that times are a changin'. With these changes, comes many new faces as well. Persons who once were able to sway the entire state with every utterance now find themselves nearly irrelevant. (Richard Flynn, anyone?)
.
Nature abhors a vacuum, as we know, and as yesterday's "important" characters fall by the wayside, a new cast eagerly lines up to fill the voids.

QUESTION: Who are the NEW power players here in New Hampshire? Who are the most influential in today's Granite State?

We're asking our regular readers to help us compile a list of the Twenty Most Influential Granite Staters, which we will then report here on the 'Grok. The way it will work is this: Send an email with "NH Power Players" in the subject line to doug (at) granitegrok (dot) com as follows: List up to 5 Granite Staters of your choosing, and a brief writeup of why you perceive each to be of statewide importance. Feel free to place your votes below in the comment section, but keep in mind that the list will be compiled ONLY from the email votes cast. We will tally the "votes" from now until Wednesday, August 29. On Thursday, we will put up a post with the list. We will include some reader comments with each winner. If you wish to remain anonymous, just say so in the email and we will respect that-- but please don't hesitate to participate.
.
NH is changing. Who do YOU think will have a role in shaping its future? Oh, and this is a non-partisan deal. I would say that, for example, former NH Dem Party Chair Kathleen Sullivan would be on my list, along with current Chair Ray Buckley.

August 6, 2007

Odd Coincidents?

Tourists on bicycles stop at Hauptplatz to admire Alter Dom in Linz, Austria

 

The church in the background is the Alter Dom, where Anton Bruckner played the organ from 1855 to 1868. After the Anschluss of Germany and Austria in March 1938, the Hauptplatz was renamed Adolf-Hitler-Platz.

Have you ever experienced something seemingly coincidental that brought you back to another time in your life where a similiar thread intertwined? It's a kinda strange feeling as though maybe we're all a little more connected then we think, and the world is getting smaller every day.

I've had a few of those moments. I graduated from high school in Oklahoma City. Four or so years later, I was walking down the hallway at the University of Alaska and passed a guy who looked familiar. We both stopped and turned around and started talking and comparing notes to try to figure out where we knew each other from. Well, it seems we both were from Okie City. In fact, he had been a basketball player and we realized that we had had one of each of our legs tied to the other to play basketball for some silly fund raiser at school. We hadn't really known each other well at all, and this was the closest we ever got. He was a mediocre basketball player and I was one of many from the pep club who had their names drawn to pair up and play b-ball.

I've had several moments like that that seem almost like de'ja vu but not really. Just that intertwined string not the feeing that you lived something before kinda feeling.

Saturday one of those things happened again that seemed even more remote and coincidental.

Continue reading "Odd Coincidents?" »

July 20, 2007

NH a nuclear state?

.
So I'm re-reading today's dead-tree edition of the Union Leader following a tip-off from one of my friends. In reviewing a page A7 report by Gary Rayno entitled "Executive Council defends $2.3 million dollar security pact" for the State Military Reservation in Concord, I learned something that one might think would have gained far more attention than it has thus far: there are weapons of destruction right here in our state's capitol! Rayno writes of District 3 Executive Councilor Beverly Hollingworth, D- Hampton:
Hollingworth said she continues to have concerns about the hiring criteria in the contract for people guarding a facility that

includes weapons of mass destruction.

Say what?! Has New Hampshire joined that elite group of nations possessing nuclear weapons? Has Saddam had them hidden right here the whole time, cleverly fooling George Bush? Are we grinding anthrax spores down at the 'ole ammo dump downtown?

What exactly does Councilor Hollingworth know that few others don't?

If anybody out there can add to this story, or explain it further, I would sure appreciate it. I haven't seen anything online as of the time of this posting. If indeed there are such weapons here in the Granite State, should we apply the solution as proposed by these brainwashed cute little innocent kids? Should State Adj. Gen. Kenneth Clark be sent to jail, per the kids' plan?
.
First came the "A-Bomb". Then the "Islamo-bomb" and the "Dirty-bomb." Do we really want to add the "Yankee-bomb" to the list of things that keep us awake at night?

July 9, 2007

Rumination - 7/8/07

Update:  ugh....what were my fingers NOT doing last nite.....spelling and other errors fixed....sheesh...

===================================== 

Well, nothing in particular...I think....just a few things that caught my attention:

This should prove to either be interesting, or amusing. 

Given that it will be based on "San Fran values", it could be both with Cindy Shaheen perhaps gunning for Nancy Pelosi for derelection of duty!

These never seem to work...at least when the attempt is used against those with will power.

If someone wishes to voluntarily go hungry or starve themelves for any purpose, fine by me, as I've never really understood the reasoning behind it (it assumes that their issue is important to me, which generally, it isn't).  If these kids want to starve themselves because of the DREAM act not being enacted, knock yourselves out. Why?  This bill discrimates against the children of legal citizens as illegals are treated more preferentially than mine; I have no stock in the argument of "these kids are innocent - why make them suffer for the sins of their parents?".  By allowing this to happen, the incentive stands for illegals to get their kids into the US.  Second, this "kids on a diet" frankly have no skinny in the game - if they wish (and all others of the same mind) want  illegals to get breaks on tuition, then start fund raising for them out of their own pockets instead of forcing the rest of us to do  so.  I'm betting that most of these hunger strikers are not even paying their own way; having to fork over the cost of sending illegals would themselves may change their outlooks in a hurry.  It's just too easy to spend other peoples' money... (H/T: Inside Ed)

At 19% approval rate, how come Congress is giving itself a $4,400 raise in the House? 

Reported by CNSNews, do you realize that over the last decade or so, the House and Senate members have put themselves into the most highly compensated group of citizens in the country?  They may rail against the rich in corporate America - but you hardly ever hear them talk about their own pay. 

I forget where I saw it, but I like this idea - Representatives and Senators receive 2,000 X their approval rating as pay.  Instead of $165,200 they actually get (close to or in the top 5% of all income in the nation), they'd be getting $38K.

I like this idea.....pay for performance!

Whadda ya know, a Dem in Congress wants to discriminate against poor people by making them pay more for gas and oil....much more....and give it to Congress to spend -

"A powerful House Democrat said on Friday that he planned to propose a steep new “carbon tax” that would raise the cost of burning oil, gas and coal, in a move that could shake up the political debate on global warming.

The proposal came from Representative John D. Dingell of Michigan, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and it runs directly counter to the view of most Democrats that any tax on energy would be a politically disastrous approach to slowing global warming."

Talk like this would have made my late Uncle Clarence spitting mad (he always voted Democratic because FDR's policies put him thru college, and that was the ONLY reason he could ever muster up)....because it is true (H/T: Captains Quarters)

Captain Ed ruminates on George Will's column.  Me?  War - run dandy....economy, not so much.  Kinda backwards today.....although the surge IS starting to work....

Our friend DCE over at Weekend Pundit has it right - English NOW

April 12, 2007

Ruminations - 4/12/07

Well, I said that blogging (from me) would light, and it sure has been!  However, Doug's been real busy playing with his new toy - VLogging!  And has seemed to have gotten a hit right out of the box with his YouTube from Congressman Hodes (D-NH, D1) - An InstaLaunche resulted!  And a lot of links from others (including our friend Pat over at AnkleBitingPundits).

*****

In the mean time, the project to get MTNP livestreaming using Winamp and Shoutcast continues on.  We've progressed from (Winamp playing) to (Winamp / DSP to Shoutcast on one system to Winamp catching it on another) to (Winamp on one node sourcing a stream to Shoutcast on another and catching it on another).  But only on my internal network.

With the help of our buddy DCE from WeekendPundit and his brother John, the next step is to put the server out on the 'Net and start experimenting with that.  We'll try a few different players and ways to catch the stream, so hopefully in a couple of weeks, Meet The New Press will be out on the 'Net!

***** 

Speaking of Pat, he did an interview here at AnkleBitingPundits with Congressman Chris Cannon (UT-03) concerning immigration.  Now, the 'Grok likes Pat a lot (as Doug, Pat, and I all own Meet The New Press together), but Doug and I do tend to razz him a bit on immigration as we don't quite see eye to eye (we're not all the hep on guest workers and his take is not primarily on a wall).  THAT said, it is a well done interview - Pat does a good job.  Go listen!  Really!

*****

My local paper, the Laconia Citizen, has a short piece (sorry, only the dead paper version) on the NH legislators adding $3 million to help support the local dairy farmers as the weather hasn't c0operated with plantings, costs are up, and the national pricing for milk has stayed the same the last few years.

Yup - government sets the price to what they think it should be, causes a distortion in the market, and then uses more taxpayer money fix the problem they started in the first place by trying to regulate prices.

Hey, why stop with milk farmers?  I know some programmers that have suffered due to globalization....

Government should stay out of the marketplace in this area.  Supply and Demand will take care of inequities and pricing.   

*****

This whole Imus thing?  When rappers are held to the same standard, I'll take it seriously.  Double standards hurt everyone.  Political correctness ("I can say it but you cannot") is prejudiced.

*****

I always thought that the Constitution said that foreign policy was the domain of the Executive branch.  Seems that when Ms. Pelosi ascended the Speakership and being third in line to the Presidency, I guess she thought she gets the chance to practice in Syria and possibly Iran.

Has she read the reviews from our enemies on her performance so far?  Listen to her, listen to our "non-friends"  - what's the difference?

*****

Well, back to streaming stuff...... 



 

April 10, 2007

Right Wing "Temperature Check"

Once again, our buddy John Hawkins of RightWingNews and the Conservative Grapevine has taken the temperature of the right side of the Blogosphere (or, the "Rightosphere", as John calls it). These were the questions:
1) If Scooter Libby loses his appeal and goes to jail, do you think George Bush, before he leaves office, should pardon him?
.
2) Should George Bush ask Alberto Gonzales to resign?
.
3) **Original question about British hostages taken by the Iranians has been omitted due to their release. It asked whether the US should take military action to help the Brits.**
.
4) If the only way to stop the Iranians from acquiring nuclear missiles was through air strikes, would you support that course of action or do you think we should allow the Iranians to get nuclear weapons instead?
Air strikes?
Let them get nukes?
5) Which side do you believe is more responsible for the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians?
Israelis?
Palestinians?
6) Do you believe the theory of evolution is correct?
.
7) Would you support an immigration bill that allowed illegal aliens to become American citizens?
.
8) Do you think abortion should either be banned or alternately banned with exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother?
.
Click here to read the results of this latest poll of right of center bloggers. Other than question #6, I ended up voting the same as the majority in every question. What are YOUR answers to this poll? Feel free to leave a comment below. John will be joining us this Saturday on our radio program, Meet the New Press, to discuss the results.

March 3, 2007

Bloggers from the right have their say...

Our friend John Hawkins of RightWingNews and The Conservative Grapevine has once again taken the temperature of the right side of the Blogosphere, and, as always, we are honored that he found GraniteGrok worthy to participate. Here's how it worked.
Right Wing News emailed more than 240 right-of-center bloggers and asked them to answer 8 questions.
The first four were questions requiring a "yes" or "no" answer.
1) Do you think the surge should go forward?
2) Do you think that a majority of Democrats in Congress would like to
see us lose in Iraq for political reasons?
3) Do you believe that the wall on the border will ever actually be completed?
4) Do you think mankind is the primary cause of global warming?

 
For the other four, bloggers were asked questions and given multiple answers from which to pick one only.
5) Illegal Immigration.
A) Would you prefer an illegal immigration bill that tackled border security and enforcement issues only?
B) Would you prefer a comprehensive bill that tackled border security and enforcement issues, created a legal status for the people who are here illegally, created a guest worker program, and increased the number of foreigners allowed to become American citizens?
6) Which of the following Democratic candidates do you think would be
the toughest opponent for a Republican candidate in 2008?
A) Hillary Clinton
B) John Edwards
C) Barack Obama
7) If you were grading George Bush on his foreign policy for his
presidency so far, would you give him an:
A or B
C
D, E, or F
8) If you were grading George Bush on his domestic policy for his
presidency so far, would you give him an:
A or B
C
D, E, or F
63 Bloggers responded.  Click here to see the results of the poll and check the list of participating blogs. John will be a guest on our radio program, Meet the New Press, today to discuss the poll and some of the thinking behind it. (Podcast page here)
.
For those of you who care how I voted, well here's my reponse to John's poll:

Continue reading "Bloggers from the right have their say..." »

February 28, 2007

Two years. That's a lot of posts, I'll bet.

Happy anniversary wishes to our friend Paul at PunSalad, who celebrates two years in the Blogosphere today. Here at GraniteGrok, we shall never forget the excitement Paul provided us by being the first blogger to link to our new site.
.
PunSalad is part politics (with a libertarian bent), part pop culture, part NH life, and part, well, Paul, I guess. It is a great blog and worth a visit every day.
.
Congratulations on your milestone Paul. Keep it up!

February 20, 2007

Hubble top 10

(H/T: Karen)

Too much to do, and too little time.  These pictures, though, should get anyone to stop in wonder for at least a few seconds (try it, you'll like it!).

Stop, calm/slow down, and marvel!

 

The Ant Nebula

 

 

Cat's Eye Nebula

More after the jump - take a look! 

 

Continue reading "Hubble top 10" »

February 13, 2007

Think like a burgler

This caught my eye (H/T: GeekPress):

The Best Place To Hide Money: Conversation With A Burglar

The community that I live in is fairly safe.  Being a rural area, we do not have anywhere the types of crime rates that large urban areas have (heck, even the middle sized suburban ones either).  However, like the rest of us, one does think - "where should I stash my stuff?".  This article brought up what I would call "the Burgler Principles".  The places and techniques that I will now use are....well, unobvious....


I had quite the interesting conversation this weekend with a person who happened to be a former burglar. It was great timing because I was wondering if something like the skid mark underwear for hiding money would really work. I also figured that if you wanted to know the best place to hide your money from a burglar, a former burglar was the person to ask.

I started off simply and was not surprised by the answer to the question “where is the best place to hide your money?”

“At the bank,” he said with a sly grin

When I rephrased and asked where the best place to hide money and valuables in the house would be if you had such items there, I was taken a bit by surprise by his answer:

“It doesn’t matter how clever you think you are or where you hide it in your house, if I have enough time, I would be able to find where you stash your valuables,” he said bluntly. He then explained that what was much more important than the actual place where you hide your valuables is that you understand a burglar’s motivations. Basically, he has two:

1. To steal your money and valuables
2. To get out of the house as quickly as possible with these goods

When you begin to think of it from this perspective, how you should hide your money changes a bit. Obviously, you don’t want to leave all your money in the places where the burglar will first look: dresser drawers, drawers by phones, desks, closets, a safe (if not bolted down), boxes, jewelry boxes, purse, etc.). That being said, you also don’t want to hide all of your money too well for the following reason:

“If I can’t find money and valuables in the normal places I usually find them, I would continue to tear the house apart until I found something. Remember, the first rule is to to steal money and valuables. We’ll keep looking until we find something.”

Go read the whole story.  Now what has to be asked is "how much should one be willing to lose outright to keep from other stuff being broken or taken to make it worth it." 

February 1, 2007

On the road again (part # - how many?) so let's play "meme"

Update: forgot to mention who I was 'tagging" in turn!  See the bottom of the post....

Yup, travel time again....and long days in the office.  And trying to keep East Coast time but keeping "eating times" on West Coast times really does throw things off kilter.  But, I've done the opposite in years past.....I'd rather do this.  Much easier on me and the family when the trip East is complete.  'Course, riding in the back of the plane can lead to flat on the back for a while once the journey is complete...

Anyways, I just noticed that I got "blog-memed-tagged" by Paul at Pun Salad.  Being a good guy (and it is too late to dive deep into the blogosphere tonight; like a right-sized dessert after a good meal, just dandy fitting!), here's my take on 5 things that my readers might not know about me:

  1. I went to BU not to get a BS in Bio or an MS in Comp. Sci, but to be pre-med.  After a summer's worth of lab experiments, the doc-in-charge told me to do the statistics workup with a large desktop calculator.  Well, having used a DEC PDP-8e in high school, I figured that the big ole IBM 360 on the main campus would whip these out post-haste.....right.....   Computers turned out to be cheaper and less deadly to experiment with than live subjects......
  2. I work all day on computers, then spend a good amount of time doing (what else) more on computers.  However, I have become an amateur in-door RC helicopter pilot.  My eldest son gave me one of those RC Mosquito helicopters, and it is a blast!  Buzzing it around the living room is great fun; my big dog hates it and my small dog wants to fight it!
  3. I hate telemarketers - if my youngest is home, he gets to "play with them" - offering to sell them things or just tries to keep them on the line for as long as possible.  I really like to listen in as he tortures them....and some are so polite, they will endure his "tauntings" for up to 10 minutes.....such a creative soul he is.......now, if he'll only get a real job.....
  4. I like play Othello.  No, not the play, the game otherwise known as Reversi.  I learned it from a gal from NY who beat me about 25 times in a row.  Then one day, she introduced me to a variation on the theme - switch sides 1/2 way through.  I won that game, and she never beat me again.  In fact, there were times when I would play 5 or so games at the same time; very seldom losing.  Wish I had kept it up.
  5. Although I don't travel much anymore, I have compiled hundreds of thousands of miles in the air (400,000?  500,000? - not going to bother to look it up).  And about 95% on just one airline in the 20-odd years I done the biz trip schtick....United Airlines.  And have learned one important lesson - it ain't tourist travel, and the down side is when your 5 year old asks "Daddy, are you going to work today?"  Yes, son, I am.  "Are you going by car, or by plane?"  He knew at the time that if I answered "plane", I was gone once again out of his young life for a week.
          It was a very long, lonely trip that week - I changed jobs soon after.

Well, since I put that up last night, I've been reminded that I was supposed to "tag" 5 other bloggers.  Well, here goes:

Pat at AnkleBitingPundits!  Someone I now count as one of my friends, he has turned out to be quite an interesting guy to know!  Every week on Meet The New Press, some new factoid about him keeps turning up!

DCE over at Weekend Pundit is my next person.  When surfing, I always try to hit his place as the stuff he writes is quite enjoyable - and we have swapped a number of comments and trackbacks. 

Note to Doug - er, we've been rather impolite - a radio show by bloggers about what's on different blogs, he's in Gilford, and we STILL haven't had him on? 

John Hawkins of Right Wing News has been on Meet The New Press (Pat just keeps on rolling on bringing great guests to MTNP!) twice now.  A solid conservative and activist, his blog is always fun with posts that could be described as "all over!".

Now for Liz Mair - bloggress over a GOPPROGRESS.  While more to the center than I in the political arena, I have enjoyed having her on the show (another "two timer" like  John!).  Interesting commentary, and a real nice person to boot!

The most surprised person on this list will be Bogie of Bogieblog - we were recently blogrolled by her and I am always humbled to think that someone thinks that well of us!

 

January 21, 2007

Tax Evader a no-show at court... and on the radio.

For those of you wondering where our previously announced radio interview with convicted tax-evader Ed Brown ended up, you can stop looking. Despite speaking with one of his comrades "holed up" at the mountaintop "compound" several times prior to air time, when it came time for the interview, they never answered the phone. I guess when you're planning "armageddon," it's hard to maintain a real schedule. You never know when the federales might "storm the gates."
.
During my last communication with the boys as they hunkered down under some sort of imagined "seige" confirming the interview that never took place, they babbled on about some movie proving that America has gone from freedom to fascism. While our freedoms are definitely being eroded in some instances, to think, as the Plainfield, NH bunch does, that it is a grand conspiracy on the part of some secret cabal, is a stretch.
.
People have willingly handed away power and freedoms all on their own ever since the beginning of recorded history in exchange for comfort. No "invisible hand" needed. What we have in America is this natural tendency manifesting itself. All you have to do is watch or participate in politics at the local level to watch this happen. It is ALWAYS easier to say "yes" than "no" to the organized beauracracies and special interest groups. Taxes go up. Freedoms go down. This is the true battle.
.
It's too bad Ed Brown and company haven't been using their talents and knowledge to win the battle for the hearts and minds of ordinary people so that they might vote accordingly and change the "regime" at the ballot box. Instead, they're holed up in their compound, fighting an imagined war with real weapons and ammo. What a waste.
.
They say that they won't be removed from their fortress without a fight, which, incidently, the government has said they will NOT start. Fine. Ed Engler, editor and publisher of the local Laconia Daily Sun has the solution:

Put up a big fence around the property and call it jail...

January 17, 2007

NH's "Waco"?

The ongoing saga of the Plainfield, NH couple fighting charges in court for tax evasion has taken a turn for the worst. Ed and Elaine Brown, believers in the notion that there is no legal federal income tax, have been in the news as their case went to court recently, where it is claimed they owe over $625,000 in unpaid taxes and withholdings.
.
After several incidents in the courtroom, last Friday, the Browns decided not to appear any more, claiming the court was nothing more than a "kangaroo court." Today, the Concord Monitor reports, Elaine is seeking the help of a lawyer and looking to see what she must do to obtain a plea bargain. Ed, on the other hand, has barricaded himself into his home, vowing a fight to the death to defend himself, if he has to.
"You attack my property, it's going to get really violent," Brown said yesterday. "I don't care who it is."

I know Ed Brown from many years back. He was the only person I'd ever met that carried a copy of The Constitution and the Federalist Papers upon his person at all times... in addition to a firearm. His knowledge and interpretation of these important Founding documents always amazed me. (Keep in mind that, at that time I was apolitical for the most part) So did his deep distrust of the government in general.

What is sad is where this has all ended up-- A man barricaded in his house, threatening a violent response to any attempts on the part of government officials at getting to him, with supporters showing up to join him in his defense. Where will it all end? Hopefully with nobody getting hurt.

Why did it turn out this way? And who is in the wrong here? While I admit that I don't like paying my taxes, and don't like some of what it supports, I don't think Ed's way is the answer. Our Founders left us with a political system of government designed to fight "wars" by another means instead of with arms. This is where the fight rightly belongs. But then again, the Browns do have a point in that they just want to be left alone-- to live peaceably, free of "harrassment" by the government-- And certainly, since the time of our Founding and the ratification of the Constitution, that government has grown. The question is where one draws that line. Can one be completely free from any attachment to the government? I think not. Should one fight for what's right? Absolutely. Not this way,though. Again from the Monitor:

"As for me, give me liberty or give me death," he said to one of his supporters on the phone yesterday, quoting Patrick Henry.

Godspeed Ed. Just don't do anything (else) foolish.

January 7, 2007

George Bush looks forward to working with Dems. Likewise, I'm sure.

In this week's radio address, the President welcomed the new Congress with its new majority led by Democrats. He laid out certain areas of agreement that he thinks he shares with many within the Congress that they can and should work together to achieve.
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, the newly elected members of the House and the Senate took their oaths of office and became part of the 110th Congress. I congratulate them all, and I look forward to working with them over the next two years.
.
Since the November elections, I've had a number of productive meetings with the new leaders in Congress, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. I was encouraged by our discussions, and I'm confident that we can find common ground in our efforts to serve our fellow citizens and to move our country forward.
.
One area where we are already finding agreement is in our effort to spend the people's money wisely. This week, I announced that I will submit a five-year budget proposal that will balance the federal budget by 2012, while making the tax relief we passed permanent. Some Democrats have indicated that balancing the budget is a top priority for them as well. By holding the line on spending and continuing our pro-growth policies, we can balance the budget and address the most urgent needs of our Nation, which are winning the war on terror and maintaining a strong national defense, keeping our economy growing, and creating jobs.
It's too bad President Bush wasn't this focused on spending restraint when the GOP was in charge. I believe the lack of fiscal discipline was one of the contributing factors to Republican losses. Bush continued...
 We also see bipartisan agreement emerging on reforming the earmark process in Congress. Earmarks are spending provisions that are often slipped into bills at the last minute -- so they rarely get debated or discussed. Many earmarks divert precious funds away from vital priorities like national defense and education to wasteful pork-barrel projects. I appreciate Democratic leaders who have pledged to maintain our current levels of spending without additional earmarks this year. And I support the temporary moratorium on all new earmarks announced by the Democrats.
Ah yes, earmarks. This is another area the GOP took a beating for. The Dems are very smart to take this up as an issue. Whether their reforms last, or are even real remains to be seen. At the end of the day, earmarks are the "crack cocaine" of the so-called bacon brought back to congressional districts, and those in Congress, on both sides of the aisle, are hopelessly addicted. Bush adds his own idea to this problem, but as with many other new initiatives, seems a day late...

Continue reading "George Bush looks forward to working with Dems. Likewise, I'm sure." »

December 31, 2006

President Bush honors Gerry Ford in this week's radio address

President Bush spoke of Gerald Ford in this week's radio address...
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, as Americans prepare to welcome a new year, we do so with heavy hearts and fond memories of our 38th President, Gerald R. Ford. We mourn the passing of a courageous leader, a true gentleman, and a loving father and husband. On behalf of all Americans, Laura and I send our prayers and condolences to Mrs. Ford and the entire Ford family.
.
Gerald Ford was a great man who devoted the best years of his long life to public service. He fought for his country during World War II. After returning home, he won the first of 13 elections to the United States Congress. The people of Michigan admired his dedication and decency, and so did his fellow members of Congress. Gerald Ford rose to become a leader of his party, and he earned the respect and good will of all who had the privilege of knowing him.
.
Gerald Ford always believed in the importance of answering the call to duty, and he was there for the Nation when we needed him most. In December 1973, he accepted the responsibilities of the Vice Presidency; and the following August, he became President of the United States without ever seeking the office. Providence gave us Gerald Ford's steady hand and calm leadership during a time of great division and turmoil. He guided America through a crisis of confidence, and helped our Nation mend its wounds by restoring faith in our system of government.
.
In his two-and-a-half years as President, Gerald Ford distinguished himself as a man of integrity and selfless dedication. He always put the needs of his country before his own, and did what he thought was right, even when those decisions were unpopular. Only years later would Americans come to fully appreciate the foresight and wisdom of this good man.
Exactly. I recall how mad people were at the time when he pardoned Richard Nixon. I happened to catch a rerun of an interview with Ford (from sometime during the '90's) in which he was explaining his reasoning for doing what he did. It made all the sense in the world for him to do it, yet he got lambasted for it, costing him re-election. No matter-- he did what was best for the country, not himself. It is this action that sets him as a model for other politicians. President Bush went on, noting...

Continue reading "President Bush honors Gerry Ford in this week's radio address" »

December 25, 2006

President Bush wishes a Merry Christmas and honors the troops and their families

In this week's radio address, President Bush talks about Christmas, and in particular, reminds us not to forget our troops afield during the holiday season...
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. As families across our Nation gather to celebrate Christmas, Laura and I send our best wishes for the holidays. We hope that your Christmas will be blessed with family and fellowship.
.
At this special time of year, we give thanks for Christ's message of love and hope. Christmas reminds us that we have a duty to others, and we see that sense of duty fulfilled in the men and women who wear our Nation's uniform. America is blessed to have fine citizens who volunteer to defend us in distant lands. For many of them, this Christmas will be spent far from home, and on Christmas our Nation honors their sacrifice, and thanks them for all they do to defend our freedom.
.
At Christmas, we also recognize the sacrifice of our Nation's military families. Staying behind when a family member goes to war is a heavy burden, and it is particularly hard during the holidays. To all our military families listening today, Laura and I thank you, and we ask the Almighty to bestow His protection and care on your loved ones as they protect our Nation.
.
This Christmas season comes at a time of change here in our Nation's capital -- with a new Congress set to arrive, a review of our Iraq strategy underway, and a new Secretary of Defense taking office. If you're serving on the front lines halfway across the world, it is natural to wonder what all this means for you. I want our troops to know that while the coming year will bring change, one thing will not change, and that is our Nation's support for you and the vital work you do to achieve a victory in Iraq. The American people are keeping you in our thoughts and prayers, and we will make sure you have the resources you need to accomplish your mission.
.
This Christmas, millions of Americans are coming together to show our deployed forces and wounded warriors love and support. Patriotic groups and charities all across America are sending gifts and care packages to our servicemen and women, visiting our troops recovering at military hospitals, reaching out to children whose moms and dads are serving abroad, and going to airports to welcome our troops home and to let them know they are appreciated by a grateful Nation.

Continue reading "President Bush wishes a Merry Christmas and honors the troops and their families" »

December 10, 2006

President's Weekly Radio Address: Iraq

Once again, the President discusses Iraq in his weekly radio address, discussing the Iraq Study Group report.
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, I held important meetings at the White House about the situation in Iraq.
.
On Monday, I met in the Oval Office with one of Iraq's most influential Shia leaders, His Eminence Abdul Aziz al Hakim. We discussed the desire of the Iraqi people to see their unity government succeed, and how the United States can help them achieve that goal.
.
On Thursday, I had breakfast with Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain. We discussed the sectarian violence in Iraq and the need to confront extremists inside Iraq and throughout the region. The Prime Minister explains it this way: "The violence is not ... an accident or a result of faulty planning. It is a deliberate strategy. It is the direct result of outside extremists teaming up with internal extremists -- al Qaeda with [the] Sunni insurgents, [and Iran with] Shia militia -- to foment hatred and thus throttle at birth the possibility of non-sectarian democracy."
I would add that it is a deliberate strategy to wear down the easily swayed Democrats and their comrades in order to defeat us from within...
The Prime Minister and I also discussed the report I received this week from the Iraq Study Group, chaired by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Congressman Lee Hamilton. Their report provides a straightforward picture of the grave situation we face in Iraq. The Iraq Study Group's report also explicitly endorses the strategic goal we've set in Iraq: an Iraq that can "govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself."
.
The report went on to say, "In our view, this definition entails an Iraq with a broadly representative government that maintains its territorial integrity, is at peace with its neighbors, denies terrorism a sanctuary, and doesn't brutalize its own people. Given the current situation in Iraq, achieving this goal will require much time and will depend primarily on the actions of the Iraqi people."
.
I agree with this assessment. I was also encouraged that the Iraq Study Group was clear about the consequences of a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq. The group declared that such a withdrawal would "almost certainly produce greater sectarian violence" and lead to "a significant power vacuum, greater human suffering, regional destabilization, and a threat to the global economy." The report went on to say, "If we leave and Iraq descends into chaos, the long-range consequences could eventually require the United States to return."
.
I am encouraged to get the sense that the President has politely received the ISG document and used portions of it to show his strategy is right, and, at the end of the day, the ONLY course we can take: stay in Iraq until we win. President Bush continues-

Continue reading "President's Weekly Radio Address: Iraq" »

December 7, 2006

NH AG issues new memorandum on Right-to-Know law.

It’s always been said that timing is everything. After blogging last week about the Republican-dominated Belknap County Convention’s continued use of closed-door meetings to conduct the public’s business and their use of a secret-ballot to make a vote in a public meeting, along comes the latest “Memorandum on New Hampshire's Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter 91-A” by NH Attorney General Kelly A. Ayotte.
.
This document is one that gets updated by the AG’s office every few years and has long been a handy tool for citizens as guidance in understanding the extent of access and openness which is required in our representative government.
.
“To the People of New Hampshire: The public’s right-to-know what their government is doing is a fundamental part of New Hampshire’s democracy. For our government to remain of the people, by the people, and for the people, while protecting individuals’ privacy, it is essential that the people have reasonable and open access to the information that will inform the people what their government is up to and how it is performing.
.
With the exception of the public business conducted at traditional annual town and school meetings, New Hampshire uses a representative form of democracy. The people’s elected representatives set and carry out most public policy. New Hampshire’s Constitution and the Right-to-Know Law ensure that the public has reasonable access to public meetings and public records that show what those elected representatives and the appointed public officials that carry out our laws are doing.”
In other words, it’s important for the people to have as much access as possible to the government that acts on their behalf. Ayotte further writes
“As New Hampshire’s Attorney General, I take an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws of our State. As part of my efforts to fulfill that duty I am proud to issue this updated Memorandum on New Hampshire's Right-to-Know Law, RSA Chapter 91-A.
.
The purpose of this Memorandum is to provide a reference guide to the statute and to the judicial decisions that further define and explain the peoples’ right-to-know. This edition includes general principles concerning the law, statutory changes since the last edition, and up-to-date judicial interpretations of the statute.
.
I urge every citizen, every school child, and every student of government to study the Right-to-Know Law. Truly understanding our representative form of democracy requires a sound understanding of your right-to-know about the public actions of your elected and appointed representatives.”
Observers of the local scene will recall that activists like me and others have invoked the Right to Know Law on several occasions. Imagine how responsive and careful local government bodies would be if even more ordinary citizens became aware of the rules this law places on elected officials.
.
As I reported last week, The Laconia Daily Sun’s Michael Kitch wrote of the Belknap County Convention’s commissioner selection process in that paper’s November 21st edition:
“Once the applications were received, Thomas refused to reveal the identification of the candidates and insisted the convention should interview behind closed doors, claiming the selection process was a ‘personnel matter’ that did not require public disclosure under the Right-to-Know law.” 
Remember, they were discussing the replacement of an elected official.

Continue reading "NH AG issues new memorandum on Right-to-Know law." »

November 29, 2006

Borat: "Thumbs Up" by Doug

After hearing and reading about the movie Borat: Cultural Learnings of America For Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan for several weeks running, I had to see for myself. If you are into low-brow, bathroom type humor, this movie's for you. I haven't had as many outright laughs watching a movie in quite some time. Yeah, it's a little rough on certain people of various persuasions, but taken in the context of being a movie meant to entertain, I can't really see reason for anybody to get too upset.
.
If the act of "passing wind" or the discussion about bodily functions brings you a chuckle (or satisfaction with a smile), then you will probably like this movie. I know I did...
.
Be warned- it's not for children.

November 26, 2006

President's Radio Address: Giving thanks, remembering our military men and women.

The President spoke about reasons Americans have to be thankful during his weekly radio address:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, Americans across our Nation gather with loved ones to give thanks for the many blessings we share. We're grateful for our friends and families, who fill our lives with meaning and purpose. We're grateful to live in a land of plenty and during a time of great prosperity. And we're grateful to Almighty God for the freedom to enjoy all these gifts.
.
Every Thanksgiving, we remember the story of the Pilgrims who came to America in search of a better life and religious freedom. Much has changed in the four centuries since these humble settlers landed at Plymouth Rock. While they were only a shivering few, we are now a strong and growing Nation of more than 300 million. And the desire for freedom that led the Pilgrims to the New World still guides our Nation today.
He then rightfully acknowledges our brave troops standing in our defense
Americans believe that every person has the right to live, work, and worship in freedom. And we're thankful to the men and women of our Nation's armed forces who risk their lives to protect those rights. This Thanksgiving, we are mindful that many of our finest citizens are spending the holiday far from their homes and loved ones, and we know that their service makes it possible for us to live in freedom.
.

Continue reading "President's Radio Address: Giving thanks, remembering our military men and women." »

November 24, 2006

Gorky Park redux...

The ongoing mystery of the now-murdered former Russian intelligence officer is the stuff of action-adventure-intrigue novels. You  know the story: Russian officer with the supposed "reformed" intelligence agency becomes disaffected, sees wrongs of "the system", defects. Reveals secrets. Hunted down by assasin sanctioned by the highest levels of the Russian government, and, sometimes, killed. With the case of Alexander Litvinenko, life imitates art...
.
The TimesOnline (UK) reports on the death of the Russian agent-turned Briton as witnessed by a friend:
Moments after he saw his friend pass away, Mr Nekrasov said: “I have been through a few things in Russia and Chechnya, but this is one of the most horrible crimes I have witnessed in my my life.”
 
“It was sadistic, slow murder. It was perpetrated by somebody incredibly cruel, incredibly heartless. It had no meaning whatsover.”
 
Although Mr Nekrasov had seen Mr Litvinenko sometimes more than once a day, Tuesday was the last occasion on which his friend could communicate properly. Yet in his final remarks, the former spy remained defiant in his battle against President Putin and the Russian security services.
.
You see, Mr Litvinenko wrote a book, Blowing Up Russia, in which he claims Russian security services blew up the buildings in the infamous 1999 Moscow apartment buildings terror attack in an effort to propel Putin to the presidency. Bunk? Hooey? Conspiracy? "Bush did the same on 9/11". Perhaps Litvinenko's claim is as silly as the Bush claim. Then again, maybe not. The perpetrators of the Reichstag Fire were never fully proven. And we're talking about the RUSSIANS here- who would say that their entire system does not resemble organized crime patterns?
.
When you throw in the recent murder of the Russian journalist following certain actions of the intelligence services, the plot thickens:
Mr Nekrasov revealed that Mr Litvinenko’s British citizenship had come through on the day of a service at Westminster Abbey for Anna Politkovskaya, a friend and critic of the Kremlin murdered in Moscow.
.
“We discussed the likelihood of another killing. Sasha warned me not to go back to Russia because it was too dangerous,” Mr Nekrasov said. “Very sadly he turned out to be the next victim, attacked in the perceived safety of Central London.”
.
Last night, Oleg Gordievsky, a KGB agent who defected to Britain, told Sky News: “It’s very sad news because he was a hero to Russia and a hero to Great Britain. He loved Britain as much as he loved Russia.”
Oh, and what does Putin have to say about all this?
An aide to Mr Putin said: “Of course it’s a human tragedy. A person was poisoned. But the accusations against the Kremiln are so incredible, so silly, that the President cannot comment.”
Like my Dad always says, "You can't ever trust the Russians." Dad's right. (again)

November 16, 2006

A hat tip to the Partner

I've been real busy with lots of stuff - no small part in setting up the podcasting (click on the new iPod icon to your right!) so I've hardly been posting anything at all lately.

But Doug has!  And lots of it, with it being high quality to boot.  SOoooooo,

Thanks Doug for covering for me!

 

November 15, 2006

Constitutional rights for terrorists, but not law-abiding gun owners.

This is rather interesting:
DALLAS, Nov. 15 /U.S. Newswire/ -- A United States citizen who now lives in Great Britain has joined with the country's leading gun owner rights organization in a federal lawsuit that says nonresident citizens are unfairly being targeted by existing laws that restrict gun ownership to those who live in the U.S.
.
Attorneys William B. Mateja, a principal in the Dallas and Washington, D.C., offices of Fish & Richardson P.C., and Alan Gura of Alexandria, Va.'s Gura & Possessky PLLC, filed the federal claim today on behalf of London, England, resident Maxwell Hodgkins and the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation.
.
Hodgkins, a 31-year-old real estate broker, is asking for a legal injunction that would prohibit federal officials from enforcing several "vague and ambiguous" gun control statutes. A Dallas native, Hodgkins is an avid gun collector and sportsman who legally owns and stores firearms in the U.S. and holds related permits for weapons possession and concealment.
.
Mateja previously served in the current Bush Administration as senior counsel to the U.S. Deputy Attorney General. Among other duties, he oversaw the Justice Department's violent crime efforts, including the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and President Bush's Project Safe Neighborhood. Prior to that, he served as lead counsel in the notable Second Amendment case U.S. v. Timothy Joe Emerson.
.
The statutes in question ban the receipt, sale and purchase of firearms by U.S. citizens who claim legal residency outside the U.S. Expatriates cannot buy guns, and while they can receive guns for "lawful sporting purposes," they cannot do so for lawful self-defense while visiting the U.S. The suit claims that these laws violate the Second and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Although Hodgkins has not been arrested or prosecuted, his attorneys say he could face federal charges should he attempt to access his guns in the U.S.
.
"These laws serve no useful purpose," says Gura. "If Mr. Hodgkins may safely have a gun for target practice or hunting, he can certainly have a gun for other lawful purposes."
.
Alan Gottlieb, founder and vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, says: "The firearms rights of American citizens do not become null and void simply because an individual lives in another country. There is no public safety rationale for laws or regulations that prohibit law-abiding citizens from exercising their rights while they are on American soil. We cannot allow a legal environment to exist where the exercise of a civil right by an American citizen anywhere in the United States is conditional to that person's country of residence."
.
The Second Amendment Foundation provides education, research, publishing and legal action focusing on the constitutional right to privately own and possess firearms, and the consequences of gun control. The organization has more than 600,000 members and supporters nationwide.
And yet various "supreme courts" routinely grant enemy  terrorists the full protection of every nuance of our constitutional rights- even to the detriment of our safety. Go figure. Any bets on whether any of this stuff gets easier under Democrat Party rule?

You cannot escape reality through the ballot box.

Item: Plutonium at atomic waste site in Iran. Reuters reports
VIENNA (Reuters) - U.N. inspectors have found traces of plutonium, of possible use in atom bombs, at an Iranian nuclear waste site as Tehran pursues a nuclear program despite the risk of sanctions, an IAEA report said on Tuesday.
.
The International Atomic Energy Agency report, obtained by Reuters, also said the U.N. watchdog still could not confirm Iran's nuclear intentions were entirely peaceful given its continued stonewalling of IAEA inquiries dating to 2003.
"Stonewalling?" Why would peacefully- intentioned entities "stonewall?"
.
Item: Chinese sub stalks US aircraft carrier. The Washington Post has the story:
A Chinese submarine came close to the USS Kitty Hawk carrier group in the Pacific Ocean last month, a top U.S. naval commander said Tuesday.
Spokespeople note that the sub was in torpedo range and could have led to some trouble. Was this a mistake by the Chinese communist navy, or perhaps some sort of a "test?"
.
Item: Netanyahu likens the current times to prewar 1938. Haaretz.com tells us
Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu asserted Monday that the Iranian nuclear program posed a threat not only to Israel, but to the entire western world. There was "still time," however, to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons, he said.

"It's 1938 and Iran is Germany. And Iran is racing to arm itself with atomic bombs," Netanyahu told delegates to the annual United Jewish Communities General Assembly, repeating the line several times, like a chorus, during his address. "Believe him and stop him," the opposition leader said of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "This is what we must do. Everything else pales before this."
Of course we all know that the Iranian leader has promised to "wipe Israel off the map."
.
Item: Dems put forth antiwar congressman John Murtha for majority leader. CNN reports. Put me in the minority.
Rep. John Murtha, the anti-war congressman who is the likely new House speaker's pick for majority leader, fended off what he called "swift boat-style attacks" on his ethics record Tuesday.The Pennsylvania Democrat also blasted his rival for majority leader, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, for siding with President Bush on Iraq.
As the Democrats take hold of the levers of power in the country, the stark reality is that the world is a very dangerous place. Can we run away fast enough to escape it?

 

.

November 12, 2006

President's radio address. Honors veterans, warns our enemies, and challenges Democrats.

President Bush commemorated veterans, warned our enemies not to misread the results of the elections, and challenged the Democrats, so very critical of his every move throughout the new world war, to cough up some ideas of how to win. Got that Democrats? WIN... not retreat.
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This weekend we commemorate Veterans Day, a day when America honors every man and woman who has worn the uniform of our military. In Veterans Day celebrations across our Nation, we remember those who have served in previous wars, those who are serving today, and those who did not live to become veterans. Especially in a time of war, we see in our veterans an example of people who stepped forward to serve a cause larger than themselves. This weekend, I ask you to take a moment to thank our veterans for their service, and express your appreciation for the sacrifices they have made to preserve our freedom and way of life.
.
One freedom that defines our way of life is the freedom to choose our leaders at the ballot box. We saw that freedom earlier this week, when millions of Americans went to the polls to cast their votes for a new Congress. Whatever your opinion of the outcome, all Americans can take pride in the example our democracy sets for the world by holding elections even in a time of war. Our democratic institutions are a source of strength, and our trust in these institutions has made America the most powerful, prosperous, and stable nation in the world.
.
As a result of this week's elections, the Democrats now hold a majority in both Houses of Congress. After the elections, I called the Democratic leaders in the House and the Senate to congratulate them on the victory they achieved for their party. On Thursday, I had lunch with Congresswoman Pelosi and Congressman Hoyer, and on Friday I met with Senators Reid and Durbin. We had good discussions. I told them what I have told the men and women in my administration: We must put these elections behind us, and work together on the great issues facing America.
.
The elections will bring changes to Washington. But one thing has not changed: America faces brutal enemies who have attacked us before and want to attack us again. I have a message for these enemies: Do not confuse the workings of American democracy with a lack of American will. Our Nation is committed to bringing you to justice, and we will prevail.
.

Iraq is the central front in this war on terror. I look forward to listening to ideas from the new leaders of Congress on the best way to support our troops on the front lines -- and win the war on terror.

Continue reading "President's radio address. Honors veterans, warns our enemies, and challenges Democrats." »

October 29, 2006

The New Media of blogging

I have been involved in the computer industry one way or another (student / professional) since high school, and I do believe that we are finally moving out of the Model T stage.  I've watched the state of hardware move from the sacred mainframe in closed off areas attended to by the high priests of the computer room to the more accessible versions of the minicomputer (now, long gone or now called "servers") to the PC revolution.  Even with the latter, it was still baby steps for a number of years.

And then, thanks to DARPA, the Internet.  Once again, we see the progression from R&D and academic labs to widespread acceptance among the first adopters, the Bubble burst, and now a more "restrained" (if ANYTHING about the 'Net  could be called constrained) growth.

The point to be made, however, is that ordinary folks can now use this valuable tool and do things with that that either the capabilities were just too expensive for the common folk, or just didn't exist period.  In this case, the power of ordinary citizens to harness the wide reach and the deep research capabilities to hold accountable those that govern or those that hold others accountable (i.e., journalists). Now, even the most  mundane and esoteric subject matter expert can be found and that expertise brought to bear.

We talked about this on our radio show ("Meet The New Press", WEMJ 1490 on Saturdays, 2-4pm EST with Doug and I AND Pat Hynes of AnkleBitingPundits) about how technology this has so leveled the playing ground.  Now anyone that can handle a keyboard can do all kinds of things.  With respect to the blogosphere, EVERYONE can be held accountable by anyone- and woe and scorn to those that do not recognize or understand the rules have changed.  It is one thing to make mistakes (which I do on a regular basis), but to not own up to them or insist that they are right - not so much on the bright side.

Well, I have a tendancy to do that.  While some bloggers tend to create brand new content, others do actual research, I guess I best fit the category of Fisker - see what others have written and comment on it.  I do the other things too, but I have the most fun fisking something.

As some may know, Doug and I belong to our Town's Budget Committee, and there are some in Town that just don't quite "get" the new reality - say something of dubious quality, and somebody somewhere is going to check it out, research it, and ensure that what you say is correct. And let the world know via blogging when they are wrong and they won't stop digging and not dropping the shovel.   Deadly stuff to one's credibility if one fires off pronouncements without doing fact checking (and we have seen so many examples of that over the last few years, like RatherGate, like the Hezbollah Faux Photography, et al).

And politicians and government officials, even at the local level, are such a self-proclaiming target!  Ah, the power of a blog!  We post local stuff over at GilfordGrok, where the local politicians are trying to do an end run around data they don't like over a situation they created over the years.  So, if you are of such a mind, I offer yet another blogger's attempt to hold those accountable as they go after someone presenting data they don't like (me).  It will be an amusing ride......

 

October 16, 2006

More on "Meet the New Press"...

As Skip noted in his post on the subject, GraniteGrok, along with AnkleBitingPundits launched our new radio program, Meet the New Press. What was amazing was that despite all the problems with making the phone connection, our two guests managed to join us- and we're sure glad they did.
.
Our first was Jon Henke. the founder of and a blogger at QandO.net as well as the Inactivist blog and the Neolibertarian Network.  He was recently hired as the New Media Coordinator and fulltime blogger for the George Allen Senate campaign. What I found most interesting about Jon's visit on the program was the fact that he was hired as the Allen campaign's "New Media Coordinator" in reaction to the blowback from now infamous "macacah" remark made by Allen during a campaign event. Jon's job is to spread the truth about the Senator and to respond to and counter the never ending smear attacks that figure prominently in politics. While this has been the S.O.P. of politics since the dawn of time, the battle in cyberspace is something new. While the blogosphere is but just one piece of a campaign and will probably never fully replace traditional politicking, Jon proves  that it is an important part.  The fact that nearly every modern, serious campaign has some type of new media or internet coordinator speaks for itself.
.
Our second guest braving the technical difficulty gauntlet was columnist W. James Antle III. Antle is a senior editor for Enter Stage Right and a columnist for OpinioNet, American Daily, Intellectual Conservative, Mens’ News Daily, The Reality Check, WEBCommentary.com and The Patriotist in addition to The American Partisan.
.
Our discussion centered around his September article for the The American Conservative- "Purpose Driven Right" in which he investigates the new generation of evangelicals and whether there might be some shift away from their strong support for the Republican party. Bottom line: They probably won't swing to the arms of the Dems, but they might stay home on voting day without much to motivate the vote. From James's piece:
a vocal minority has persisted in arguing that the GOP, as the party of the rich, isn’t the best vehicle for a Christian political witness. “There are 2,000 Bible verses that deal with caring for the poor,” says Balmer. “Jesus never mentioned abortion.”
.
The outcome of this debate may hinge on younger evangelicals, who have grown up in an era when the Religious Right was a fact of political life rather than a new innovation. “Some are less embedded in the subculture and will be less likely to hear the political cues,” says Laura Olson, a Clemson University political science professor who has studied the evolution of evangelical political involvement. “They will be no less committed to pro-family issues, but they’ll say, ‘Let’s talk about poverty, hunger, and the environment.’” Olson points out that even prominent liberal evangelicals—such leaders as Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo—oppose abortion and hold orthodox views about homosexuality.
.
Jessica Echard, executive director of Eagle Forum, is a young Christian conservative who believes the social issues will remain paramount. “I don’t see the evangelical base energized by these new issues,” she says. “They care about babies, marriage, and what their children see on TV.”
Some changes may be inevitable, however. “As the number of evangelicals has grown, they have become more like the society around them,” says Olson. “That will lead to a diversity of opinion on a lot of issues.” Peter Brown, the assistant director of the Quinnipiac Polling Institute, agrees that on many issues “evangelicals are in line with the rest of mainstream America.” Yet Brown doesn’t foresee a real partisan shift among evangelical voters. “People vote based on values and comfort level,” he says. “There’s no evidence evangelicals are losing that comfort level with the Republicans just over the environment.”
A very interesting piece indeed. James was a great radio guest, too. Click here to read the whole thing.
.
The plan for Meet the New Press is to continue bringing a variety of guests from all corners of the blogosphere every Saturday. We'll be making segments available for download as soon as we finish setting up for it.

October 15, 2006

President's Radio Address: "Real Consequences"

This week President Bush spoke of North Korea's apparent detonation of a nuclear bomb. This is, of course, really bad news for the US and the rest of the world- the fact that one of the main members of the "Axis of Evil" now has such a weapon.
.
The president continues to push the "6-party" talks while his detractors want direct negotiations between the US and North Korea. Go figure- Bush, after getting lambasted for "going it alone" in various aspects of the new world war wants six nations (most of which are in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula) involved with the diplomatic efforts, while his political foes encourage a process that excludes all but the US. Thank God President Bush seemingly stays focused on the task at hand, and not his popularity as defined by the opposition...
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a successful nuclear weapons test. In response to North Korea's provocative actions, America is working with our partners in the region and in the United Nations Security Council to ensure that there are serious repercussions for the North Korean regime.
.
North Korea has been pursuing nuclear weapons and defying its international commitments for years. In 1993, North Korea announced that it was withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The United States negotiated with North Korea and reached a bilateral agreement in 1994: North Korea committed to giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for help with peaceful nuclear power.
.
After I came to office, we discovered that North Korea had been violating this agreement for some time by continuing work on a covert nuclear weapons program. My administration confronted the North Korea regime with this evidence in 2002, and the North Koreans subsequently walked away from the 1994 agreement.
.

Continue reading "President's Radio Address: "Real Consequences"" »

Gorbachev - as if he did anything right?

From ABC News:

Oct 13, 2006 — BERLIN (Reuters) - Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, who played a key role in ending the Cold War, said the United States had squandered an opportunity to improve global politics after the Cold War, a paper said on Friday.

I'm not entirely sure that he played such a key role in ending the Cold War, unless you accept the fact that he bungled the last chances the Soviet Union had at staying together as the Soviet Union.

OK, Mr. Gorbachev....let's give you that one.  In the meantime, what were YOU doing to help out  and "improve global politics"?  Not much is coming to mind....ummm....nope, not a thing.

It is so easy to throw stones, isn't it? 

In comments that were among the harshest he has made about the United States, Gorbachev compared U.S. foreign policy to one of the deadliest diseases on the planet — AIDS.

"Today our American friends are suffering from an illness worse than AIDS. And I would say this is the victor's complex," Gorbachev was quoted as saying in an interview with the Netzzeitung.

At least he got the name right: VICTOR' complex.  As opposed to "runner up" or second place, which the instructors at the Navy SEALS Buds training call "first losers". 

Unable to extricate itself from its Cold War mentality, the United States was playing a dwindling role in world politics, while Russia, China, Brazil, Europe, India and Japan were becoming stronger, Gorbachev said.

Only in relative terms could this assertion ever be held true.  Nothing  ever stays the same and the scores of nations "at the top" are always swapping spots..... 

North Korea, which said on Monday it had successfully completed a nuclear test, was an example. Only China and Russia were in a position to handle Pyongyang, he said.

Well, if the US had chosen to act like the old Soviet State did with respect to its former satellite states, we most certainly could have - just nuked them.  Case closed, problem over.  Much easier than tanks in Czechoslovakia, eh?

Washington will in future have to act less on its own and get used to a position of diminished importance, he said.

For the forseeable future, only if WE believe that we are of diminished importance, will the above assertion be true.  This is more of a political will situation.  Also, this is true ONLY IF one does not compare our capabilities with those in the countries he lists.

He said the United States and other Western countries had missed an opportunity to make the world a better place after the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 ushered in the end of communism.

Like he was helping to usher in a new era of cooperation and friendship?

Methinks the operative word here is:

sour grapes

 


October 10, 2006

Ruminations on 10/10/06

Thinking is not going too well....blogging will probably be "lightweight" for a bit more

Reason?  Been fighting a sore throat and a cough for over a week...the kind that the more you talk, the more it hurts.  the more it hurts, the more you cough, the more you cough....well, you get the idea.  Worst part is at night that even with cough syrup, the coughing wakes you up, and now you get to add "lack of sleep".....sheesh.....

Not to fear, off to the Doc's tomorrow.... 

In the meantime.......a few thoughts.....

*****

Still waiting for my favorite tree  to start turning...and being in central NH, they are starting to turn colors quickly.....should be real good.  Hmmmm, time for some pictures.....

*****

Nielson (the ratings  folks) are testing a new device setup that will signal back what you are watching based on a clip on device talking to a base station.  Problem is, how will it account for folks like me that multitask - the TV may be on, but little attention is paid to it.....too much Internet....

*****

YouTube bought by Google.  1.65 Billion in stock.  67 employees and not a dime in profit.  Is this the second coming of the Internet bubble? 

*****

'Course, the big news of the day is the North Koreans lighting off the big one.  Lower yield than expected, and no one has picked up radioactives afterwards as a confirmation.

Am I ultra-concerned right now?  No.  Soon - perhaps.  Here's the dilemma - it is not that NK is going to go after us right away (unless the failure of their newest rockets was staged - if so, they could hit most of the US).  My main concern is that they may sell completed devices to the highest bidders, and then walk away. 

This is the same dilemma with Iran as well.  Sell, sit back, and enjoy the show.

What do we do?  Face it - we have no good options.  Not with the political correctness griping our policies but our allies as well.  Everything is talk, talk, talk, talk, talk - but no action, no retaliation, no accountability.

Is the UN going to do something meaningful?  Nope - look at the EU-3/Iran "diplomacy" model and the absolute lack of results.  Ditto now for the Clinton Framework and the 6 way talks - the absolute lack of results.

So what to do with folks that lie just to waste time, and then laugh at us for allowing them to do such?   What to do when a Korean Tyrant is willing to let millions of his countrymen (and children) starve?  He proves by this that he cares not about his country but only his power. 

At this point, I don't see us doing much at all.  In fact, I'll go further and say that if even if a European city got hit first, the West wouldn't do much then either - immediately go into "law enforcement mode" and not hit back the obvious providers.  And then we wait for the second....

And if it were the US?  THe reaction would be tremendously different, and I think those that would  espouse pacificism and restraint would be outright ignored.

But the problem remains - who to hit?

As silly as this may sound, there's not much that can be done unless the UN or the signatories of the non-proliferation crank up the courage machine and say - let us in by X amount of time.  And if not?  perhaps it IS time to put diplomacy away (look at its results so far) and start bringing out the big stick.  Look at history - the West is too willing to let things slide in the short term to give the illusion of peace just that little extra time up front, and then pays a much much higher price in life and treasure to make up for that self-justification.

Maybe it is time to swap.

*****
LGF has a report on how archeologists now want to determine how we wage wage

*****
Wasn't to happy to see the welcome that the Minutemen got at Columbia U last week.  For holding themselves up to be such bastions of academic freedom and discussion, this was certainly a long fall down.

The short of it was - Hey, if we don't like what you say, we're going to attack and and lay waste to your speech.   And then celebrate it!

So where are the instructors, the TAs, the Profs of all ranks, and the Administration, in all this?  Free speech is free speech even when you don't like what is being said.

Manners?  Civility?  Respect?  Nope, nothing more than a thuggish mob mentality that thinks that they have triumphed over "the enemy".  Real thoughtful approach to a discussion?  Not a clue.

*****
Amusing - THE DNC put  up a page  praising our  service members.  Right, that's not the amusing part.  The funny bit is that the soldiers on the DNC page were.....Canadian. 

Sure, the Democrats support OUR troops.....if they could recognize what they looked like (Dad of a discharged Marine).

 

 

 

 

September 28, 2006

Here Kiddies- Come get a cookie... Part 2

As a followup to yesterday's posting, here is my weekly newspaper column as published in the Laconia Daily Sun, which is not available online...

Exercising the First    by Doug Lambert

Education? Marketing? Propaganda.

 

When I wrote of the canceling of the OreoMobile demonstration at the Laconia Teen Center several weeks ago, I reminded readers never to underestimate the ability of the hardcore political left in their attempts to indoctrinate America’s youth. There is no end to the tricks liberals use to ensnare young minds. Through the clever visual use of a popular food treat, the disingenuous purveyors of the leftist, anti-military agenda are quite busy in their mission to bring the upcoming generation into their political camp. What is more innocent than the beloved Oreo cookie? With a hint of Ben & Jerry’s excellent tasting ice cream? Here kiddies... come and get a treat!

As I noted before, nothing could be more insidious than this simplistic sounding fun- because that’s not what it is at all. The demonstration is an overt antiwar, anti-military exhibition using cookies as props. It begins with stacks of large, plastic “cookies” showing the disparity of military spending between the US and other countries, with the “Axis of Evil” included. Naturally, the U.S. “stack” is taller than the rest- implying that we spend way more- and too much- on national defense. The presenter then gives the audience a breakdown of federal budget spending, showing in dramatic fashion, how military dollars spent surpasses those being spent on education, hunger, health care, and other familiar liberal causes. He ends with a call for the redistribution of defense monies to those programs instead- despite the fact that the US Constitution clearly provides for a national defense while saying nothing about the funding of what his group deems important.

Last week, the Daily Sun published a letter and an editorial op-ed piece written in defense of the OreoMobile program, accusing me of putting forth “utter fiction” that prevented “the community from discussing critical issues facing us today.” There is a big difference between “having a discussion” and giving a one-sided lecture dripping with objective points of view sold as fact. While both writers inadvertently prove this point quite well, they missed my main point- this particular “show” is not appropriate for a “Day for Kids” event or the mission of the Teen Center. Most normal folks would agree that the OreoMobile show features topics and themes that go beyond the understanding of young minds (and many adults, too) - unless the mission is to plant an anti-military “seed” that will grow with careful liberal nurturing in the schools. “Oh but Doug, it’s just fun... the kids get COOKIES for crying out loud. What’s wrong with that?”

           

Continue reading "Here Kiddies- Come get a cookie... Part 2" »

September 27, 2006

Here kiddies...come get a cookie! UPDATED-Pt.1

I originally posted the following here on the 'Grok on September 18th. The piece was part of my weekly Laconia Daily Sun (unavailable online)  column published on the 14th:
Never underestimate the ability of the hardcore political left in their attempts to indoctrinate America’s youth. There is no end to the hidden tricks the liberals will use to ensnare young minds. A good example of just such a thing right here in central New Hampshire was this past Saturday’s now-cancelled event offered up by the Lakes Region Teen Center. What could be more innocent than “Ben & Jerry’s OreoMobile”, right? Isn’t it nice…cookies! For the kids!
.
Nothing could be more insidious than this simplistic sounding fun- because that’s not what it is. The demonstration, which I have witnessed on several occasions, is nothing more than an antiwar, anti-military propaganda exhibition using cookies as props. You would be hard-pressed to find something more overtly political than the ideas presented. I called the center to alert them as to the nature of the “show.” Naturally, they were unaware of the dirty details. Shame on Ben & Jerry for pushing this political trickery on unsuspecting people trying to do right for the children! Thankfully, those running the Teen Center did the right thing and called it off.
Well, the libs who seek to indoctrinate the kiddies in any way they can have responded. They aren't going to take this setback without a fight... The September 21st Daily Sun printed (alongside my weekly column) a letter and column written in response to what I wrote (above).
.

Continue reading "Here kiddies...come get a cookie! UPDATED-Pt.1" »

September 25, 2006

Cold Pizzas & Warm Cokes...

I'm sure this isn't good news for the consumer. The Saturday Palm Beach Post contained the headline:

Pizza Delivery Drivers Form a Union.

Yikes! Here's the story:

Eleven Domino's employees hoping to make a little more dough and get a bigger slice of the profits have formed the nation's first union of pizza delivery drivers.

The American Union of Pizza Delivery Drivers won recognition from the National Labor Relations Board over the summer as the bargaining agent for drivers at a Pensacola franchise.

The union organizing drive was started by Jim Pohle, a 37-year-old Domino's driver who said he delivers pizzas because he likes to sleep late, smoke on the job and listen to the radio.

Egads!!!! SMOKING?! On the job!? I think the union needs to protect its members from harmful exposures, don't you?

Oh, and really now, do you ever expect to get warm pizzas anymore? "Oh, you wanted that warm? Not my job, bub. You know... union rules." 

(H/T- my Dad down in FL who never misses the important news...)

September 12, 2006

Headlines that make your day...

"OPEC concerned over falling oil prices"- I'll bet the Dems are too...
.
"Clinton vs. Gore?"- Could it get any more delicious for those of us in the "pundit" class?
.
"CNN Headline News scraps afternoon newscast"- The old dinosaur continues to flail in the face of real competition.
.
"Khatemi Is Served With Summons at Gala Dinner"- At least somone's got some sack- certainly not the US State Department that issued this thug a visa in the first place.
.
"Crowd 'hangs' bin Laden in protest of radical Islam"- Oh yeah! I love a good hangin' "in effigy"! They did it right across the street from a mosque in California!
"Our goal, in addition to commemorating the terrorist attacks, is to bring attention to this mosque, which still is allowed to preach hatred and anti-American sentiment, while operating under a tax exempt status within our borders,"

September 3, 2006

North Korea - like CAIR?

It seems that when ever there is a terrorist attack that is carried out by Muslims, you can depend on good 'ole CAIR to roll out and warn the nation on yet another backlash against Muslims.

Kinda like what North Korea is doing now - let's make something out of nothing!  The Washington Post is reporting that  North Korea's "Committee for Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland" (ya just gotta love these names!) is complaining about not only our anti-missle test but also our joint military exercises with our allies, the South Koreans:

North Korea accused the United States on Saturday of provoking war by carrying out an anti-missile test over the Pacific and holding military drills with South Korean forces on the divided peninsula.

The North's Committee for Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland said the joint exercise was the most provocative yet and, given its scale and content, a virtual declaration of war against the communist state.

A virtual declaration?  What is this, about the 100th one?  At what time to do they realize how silly they look when they keep issuing these warning over a even sneeze?  What DON'T they complain about and start in on saber rattling?

"On the occasion of the Ulchi Focus Lens joint military drills, the United States even conducted a missile test aimed at attacking us from the South and the U.S. homeland and intercepting our missiles," said the committee's statement, carried by the official KCNA news agency

 

Uh-huh.  We shoot a missile from Alaska (NORTH of N.Korea) southward, and this is supposed to be an attack from the SOUTH of them?  And what, we are NOT supposed to intercept missiles? 

Has our internal politics gotten that bad that they think we'd believe this? 

 

August 30, 2006

I think he needs a math lesson

From CNN we get this story about Chevron getting tossed out of Chad:

N'DJAMENA, Chad (Reuters) -- Chad ordered U.S. energy giant Chevron and Malaysia's Petronas on Saturday to leave the country within 24 hours for failing to honor tax obligations, in a move apparently motivated by a desire to earn more from its oil.
"From tomorrow, the representatives of Chevron and Petronas must leave Chad and close their offices," Idriss Deby, president of the central African nation, told a government meeting.

OK, I can understand this - if you don't pay, you don't play.  However, as they say on infomercials - "But wait!  There's more!"

The surprise move followed Chad's decision to create a new national oil company, which it said should become a partner in the country's existing oil-producing consortium, led by U.S. major Exxon Mobil and including Chevron and Petronas.

Landlocked Chad, which began pumping crude in 2003, produces around 160,000-170,000 barrel per day but most of its people remain poor.

At 160K barrels per day, figure round number of $70/barrel, that's $4.01 billion a year.  How much is Chad supposed to get of that amount?

Under the 1988 agreement with the foreign consortium, Chad gets 12.5 percent of the wellhead value of total production, before quality discount and the cost of sending it through the pipeline to Cameroon's Kribi terminal.

Well, 12.5% comes out to be....$511 million.  Well, if I was supposed to get that amount, I'd be a tad irritable, too, if it wasn't coming into my bank account!  Throw the bums out!

Oh, wait, there's more!


Continue reading "I think he needs a math lesson" »

August 11, 2006

Ruminations on 8/11/06

And quickly too....it's late......been a long week already

NewsBusters reports:

 

Where Are We Going Wrong Helping Homegrown Terrorists Integrate Society?

Posted by Mark Finkelstein on August 10, 2006 - 15:45.

Made-in-the-UK Islamic radicals are trying to murder people - and it's the UK's fault for not doing a better job integrating them into society.

Of COURSE it's the West's fault, why else would they be trying to kill us? 

[SNIP]

Corpe: "It was a problem even before 7/7 happened last year. . . We are not facing foreign terrorists but people bred here in the UK. Something our politicians have been discussing today. Not only [must we] be more tolerant of the Muslim faith and realize these few do not speak for the Muslim faith. These people born here, brought up here, going to our schools and still feel the need to blow up planes to, to plot to explode buildings and tube stations.

Continued Corpe: "We have a real job to do here in the UK to try to reintegrate these people and find out where we are going wrong in helping these people realize that if they want to stay in this country they have to accept the freedoms we have here and respect human life in the same way we do."

Well, the concept is identified correction "they have to accept the freedoms....", but loses the concept on the "where are we going wrong" bit.  My sense of personal responsibility (applied to all who are not approaching room temperature) is that they've decided NOT to.  And it looks pretty lame that we are going to "help" them do anything.  They have to help themselves.  Our only option is to get them to leave - a better option than them trying to kill me.

****

LGF reports:

CAIR Goes Nuts Over Bush Remark

 

Continue reading "Ruminations on 8/11/06" »

August 2, 2006

No, computers do not solve all problems

From Computerworld:

Manager complains to pilot fish [the IT guy -Skip] that "my Internet is broken," so fish stops by his cube. "He wants to know why he can't find archery supplies on the Internet," says fish. "I give him a stern look -- this is on company time -- and look at the search window, where the phrase 'archy supplyies' is in the input box. I tell him it helps if you get the spelling correct. He replies, 'C'mon man, you know I'm not good with computers.' Just then a co-worker pipes up to say, 'Fred, that isn't a computer skill -- that's a life skill!' "

Being in the computer industry, I hear about these kinds of things all the time.  Some are amusing, some make me cringe.  This one gets thrown into the heaps called "lazy" (c'mon, you can't even use a spellchecker?) and "just enough to get by".

Of the two, I think the latter catagory is worse.  How many people do you know do "just enough to get by"?  Face it, we all do from time to time (and for one reason or another - some good, and some just "lazy").  However, there are a lot of people who do nothing but "just enough"; they are coasting through life.  I have some compassion for those that are coasting (or, is it "existing") because they have been beat down so much so many times; this can be understood.  Yet, there are many examples of people that should not have succeeded based on their life's events but have strived and overcome.

This IS the land of opportunity, of making almost anything happen that you can think of and are willing to work for.  However, there are those that won't even try!  Education helps, luck and being in the right place helps, but the most important thing is to be willing to try (and fail if required) and keep trying. 

Which means that one has to have the spirit of persistence, the willingness to not give up.  These are the folks that succeed in this country.  I laughed when I read the above, and I shake my head when I wonder what the percentage must be that basically give up.

Heck, not only do they don't even try to reach for the brass ring - they don't even want to get on the carousal.

July 27, 2006

Air Taxi - Very LIght Jets.....faster please!

      

 

 Small jet pix is from Eclipse, larger pix is from Honda (note where the engines are positioned!).

I am recently retired as a Frequent Flyer....not that I dislike business travel (when held to a reasonable level) but because my job focus has changed.  However, I've had my fill of sitting around in airports at odd times of the day or night just because of the airline schedules not jiving with mine.

Thus, these are GREAT news for flying road warriors everywhere!  For the price of a biz or 1st class ticket, the plane will be where I want it and when I want it to be going outbound, and coming home, if my client visit is such that I am earlier or late, the plane will still be there!  No more security hassles (that can make you late at certain airports like John Wayne or O'Hare), no more waiting in uncomfortable seats, unable to get an Internet connection (unless you want to fork over your first born for the first hour....hmmm, interesting swap!).  No more surly passengers who have had more than their fare share of alcohol who then want the rest of us share in their experience.  No problems in storing my stuff!!

And no more rude passengers to deal with.

Since it is a hike to MHT, and always having to go thru O'Hare or Dulles (mostly), I will be glad to have direct flights.....

 
 


Still Outfoxed... FNC: Liberals' Bane!

Friend John H. of Laconia, NH forwards the following on the latest in the ongoing discomfort Fox News Channel causes their news media brethren, whom they happen to whip day after day in the ratings. From the FreeRepublic.com, courtesy of Newsmax.com:
About two-thirds of the 150 attendees at a Television Critics Association’s gathering walked out of the room before Fox News Channel chairman and CEO Roger Ailes took the stage for a news conference. Several critics even openly voiced their scorn for what they view as Fox News’ conservative spin. Ailes then gleefully reminded the critics who did remain that Fox News has led all cable news channels in the Nielsen ratings for the past 55 months and has more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined.
Liberals have long feared Fox News, as it finally allows a more balanced look at the important news to break through the singular viewpoint and control as long offered by the old-guard media. What follows is a piece I wrote on the subject involving local libs for my Daily Sun column back in 2004...

 

Continue reading "Still Outfoxed... FNC: Liberals' Bane!" »

July 26, 2006

He really thinks OUR taxes are going to fund Mexican development?

Update 2: (7/26/06)

Well, since Carl decided to comment, I needed to do a little more homework... see the comments.  However, I decided to look at the Bill a little bit closer, and indeed, I found two things that allow politicians get off scot-free. See if you can spot them:

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

    The purposes of the Fund shall be--
      (1) to increase the economic competitiveness of North America in a global economy;
      (2) to reduce the income gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States; and
      (3) to promote economic development in Mexico in the areas of infrastructure, education, technology, and job training.

and

SEC. 7. REPORT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Government of Mexico complies with the criteria described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 5(b), and once every 180 days after such date of compliance and before the finalization of the agreement described in section 2, the President shall submit a report to Congress detailing the progress made by the Government of the United States to establish the Fund in accordance with this Act.

Notice what is missing?  Accountability. 

This is a project - the Fund is supposed to straighten out Mexico (something it doesn't seem to be able to do for itself).  But how is that to be measured?  Any project manager worth their salt knows that in order to be successful, you need deliverables on a milestone basis.

What this is setting up is that it can do anything, or nothing.  Sure, there is reporting - looks good on paper, doesn't it?  The only accountability is setting the stupid thing up in the first place.  

Then what?  If the US gov't, because of its size and special interests,  cannot get things right in a lot of areas, what gives anyone the idea that three countries (one of which is failing) will succeed?  Yes, NATO succeeds only because its mission is singular.  NO if you look at the UN, and the EU ain't such a hot place economically or from a democratic standpoint either (ever notice that most of the EU ministers and minions are, for the most part, unelected?).

 

 

 

UPDATE 1: (7/26/06)

The Senate bill can be found here .

 ====================================

Sorry, I am in a real snarky mood today....and now Senator Cornyn (R-Texas) has the gall to try this:

Cornyn wants US taxpayers to fund Mexican development - North American Investment Fund

How would this be done?  Listen to his pitch:

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, has quietly introduced a bill to create a "North American Investment Fund" that would tap U.S. and Canadian taxpayers for the development of public works projects in Mexico.

Has all the oxygen gone out of the air in Washington!?!?!?!

Continue reading "He really thinks OUR taxes are going to fund Mexican development?" »

July 22, 2006

Burton "combs" the district, trolling for votes

The July 22nd Foster's Online tells us that
Executive Councilor Ray Burton took his campaign for re-election to the streets Friday afternoon when he toured Laconia and Belmont in his orange campaign bus.
 
If re-elected, this would be Burton's 15th term on the New Hampshire Executive Council and his ninth on the Grafton County Board of Commissioners.

"I like to feel I give the district a good combing," said Burton, who hands out combs and campaign literature at each of his stops.
For readers unfamiliar with the position Burton so vigorously campaigns to keep, the NH Executive Council website tells us
The Executive Council of the State of New Hampshire- more commonly known as the Governor's Council has the authority and responsibility, together with the Governor, over the administration of the affairs of the State as defined in the New Hampshire Constitution, the New Hampshire statutes, and the advisory opinions of the New Hampshire Supreme Court and the Attorney General.
Each of the five Executive Councilors represents one fifth of the population or approximately 247,000 citizens. Councilors are elected every two years, concurrently with the Governor. The Councilors participate in the active management of the business of the state. They receive assistance from the Commissioner of the Department of Administrative Services and the Attorney General who review requests involving state funds since no expenditure can be legally authorized without the availability of adequate funds.
While he's "combing" the district, one wonders if he's more selective these days about who he hauls around in his entourage. Remember this, from the September 2nd, 2005 Concord Monitor?
A longtime campaign worker for Executive Councilor Ray Burton is a convicted sex offender who was arrested again in Concord this week for contact with teenage boys.
Burton, a Republican from Bath, said he knew about Mark Seidensticker's past offense while he used him for campaign work for more than a decade. Last year, law enforcement officials forbade Seidensticker to have unsupervised contact with minors. Burton said he exercised strict personal supervision over Seidensticker during campaign events.
Anybody in an important position such as Ray Burton should use better judgement.

 

July 21, 2006

The changing nature of war, or is the West only just starting to catch up?

The kind of war that most of us remember, and that most history books contain, are wars against nations. Armies, navies, air forces – all are the forces of nation-states use to either conquer other nations (re: Iraq taking over Kuwait) or to protect its citizenry (e.g., America after being attacked by Japan in WW II). This is familiar and wars of these nature are “normal”.

The attack by Hamas on Israeli forces, citizens, and land (after evacuating from the Gaza strip in a failed show of trading land for Peace) and then by Hezbullah in the north shows a different type of war...one that the West is almost helpless to wage. It is not the case that the West lacks the military forces; rather, it is the lack of a legal or ethical foundation on which to wage war effectively when at least one side refuses to fight “by the rules”. We are ill equipped to handle a conflict where the other side embeds its forces and logistics within the civilian population. Why is this? There are two reasons.

Let us discuss the first.  How do you wage war by rules that the other side not only ignores, but glorifies in breaking those rules?  How do you fight when hamstrung by guidelines that seem to be no longer valued by both sides (for without both sides honoring them, they aren't worth the paper on which they are written) ?

An example is this: we hear so much that we must abide by the Geneva Convention so that when our prisoners are captured, they will be well treated.  Can someone tell me, with a straight face, when our folks were treated well?  Seems to me that the Islamofacists seem to enjoy separating heads from necks with long knives (no matter if their captive is military or civilian).  They flaunt their disregard for conventions.  Our response?  The Supreme Court (the Hamdan decision): makes it encumbent upon our military and legal systems to treat these non-state combantants as if they were members of a nation-state that was a signatory to the Conventions when no such agreement with that Convention exists. 

Gee, do we have to continue to make it harder to effectively defend ourselves? 

Continue reading "The changing nature of war, or is the West only just starting to catch up?" »

July 16, 2006

Frequent Flyer

I used to do a lot of flying...a LOT of flying.  First for Digital Equipment in the early to mid 80's and then again with my present company from the late 90's up to about a year ago.  How much?  For a few years, I was a member of United's Premier Executive level.  Kinda nice, they take care of you better than a casual passenger that may fly once or twice a year or decade. Kinda of a dubious reward - it is somewhat prestigious to get to that level, but it also means that I spent a lot of time away from home.

I figure (without checking my balance, which I haven't done in a long time), I've probably flown close to 500,000 in all.  Not as much as some, but plenty more than others.

This post  is a good item to read for both current FFs and those that seldom travel.  Morale of the story - be nice.  There are times when it does pay to be rude (in all