blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
RBOBlog
RedHampshire
Rob Boyce Blog
TBONH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


Main

February 6, 2010

Safe? Sure. But are they learning?

Guest post by Jeff Woodburn

My large frame is hard to hide, but I do my best. I'm scrunched down in the corner of my classroom, a dozen or so seventh-graders are gathered around me. The lights are off, shades down and door locked, or so I hope. If this were not a safety drill, I'm afraid I'd be an easy target even for a poor sighted armed-intruder. I wonder in the uncomfortable silence, what students in Japan are doing while we prepare for this near-statistical impossibility.

In a moment, the principal's voice pierces the quiet and ushers us back to work. If schools are anything today, they're safe; possibly to the point of paranoia. After all, state law requires all schools to be not only “safe,” but also “secure, and peaceful.” Yet when a rare breach of security does occur, like in December when a seventh-grade English teacher was charged with a spree of bank robberies, the authorities wilt providing little candor or confidence.

After Hollis-Brookline Middle School teacher Gail Rasmussen was arrested, Brookline Police Sergeant Michael Kurland reassured parents. "My biggest concern,” he said, “is the speculation that's out there that these kids weren't safe.” He added "This was a non-violent crime.” She was released on $500 bail and required to remain in a live-in treatment center that caters to gambling addicts until she gets her day in court.

Despite this shocking anomaly, schools, as well as society in general, are safer than ever before. By every statistical measure we are safer today than at any other time in human history. Just over a century ago it was common for immigrant parents to bury a child or two. They lived in a time of vast danger, poverty, and cruelty, yet they didn’t wallow in it. They didn’t have the time; they had a slew of other kids to tend to and countless other tasks just to survive.

These parents modeled how to deal with real adversity and they did it with a steel-like resilience and an optimistic spirit, and apparently their offspring learned something along the way. After all, these kids went on to become “the greatest generation” by surviving the Great Depression and winning the Second World War.

Of course, when events like those at the Hollis-Brookline school occur, the lawyers come in and common sense goes out. Certainly, counselors are helping students as they move from shock to anger and eventually to understanding. But more than what kids are feeling, I’m interested in what they are learning. Rest assured, Ms. Rasmussen’s seventh -grade students are learning from this experience. Hopefully, they’re learning that there are always consequences for poor decisions; one must take responsibility for their own physical and mental well-being and finally that redemption can be earned in time.

I put this question to Dr. Jerry Melvin, who led the North Syracuse, New York, school system, during a similar situation. Last year one of their high school’s math teachers was charged and convicted of bank robbery.

Melvin, who has New Hampshire ties having been a principal in Keene and Superintendent at Exeter in the 1970s, couldn’t say much as it was a personnel issue. He did add, that “Initially it was very difficult on the students and staff. It shocked them.”

That teacher, by the way, received a sentence of only four years in prison in part because he had a gambling addiction and that the 12-gauge shotgun, which he used during the robbery, was not loaded and had a trigger lock. I guess this proves once again that being safe is not only smart, but saves time.

Jeff Woodburn of Dalton is a teacher and writer. He's taught in middle and high school settings. Previously, he owned an award-winning real estate firm and was prominent in state politics. He and his wife and four children live on a small hill farm, where they raise poultry. This piece was first published in Parenting NH Magazine and is used with permission of the author.


 

January 29, 2010

You know what really is the pits Educationally?

And my state of NH is falling for it hook, line, and sinker...

This:

(H/T: Cato)

Ah yes, the impertinent question - has all that money actually provided a positive result for, you know, real kids?  As opposed to, obviously, And Obama wants to pour more Federal bucks into the mix? It would be one thing if all that money made those result tick upwards even a little, but it is not.

What's worse, when viewed the the Obama / Arne Duncan "Race to the Top" program that is going to the process of the Federal Government to bribe States with taxpayer monies  distribute "stimulus" cash, I would think that the operative question is "you really think this is going to waste"? 

RttT?  The definition:

Through Race to the Top, we are asking States to advance reforms around four specific areas:

  • Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy;
  • Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction;
  • Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and
  • Turning around our lowest-achieving schools.

Awards in Race to the Top will go to States that are leading the way with ambitious yet achievable plans for implementing coherent, compelling, and comprehensive education reform. Race to the Top winners will help trail-blaze effective reforms and provide examples for States and local school districts throughout the country to follow as they too are hard at work on reforms that can transform our schools for decades to come. 

Problem? You bet!

Continue reading "You know what really is the pits Educationally?" »

January 26, 2010

International Baccalaureate - still supporting a failed UN Global Warming farce?

The recent scandal involving leaked-mails from the IPCC, showed there was a deliberate attempt to prevent scientific data on global warming from being released.  There were also attempts to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request and attempts to silence "man made" global warming skeptics.  It looks like this scandal goes even further.
 
The New York Times ran an article titled: "U.N. Admits Error in Overstating Himalayan Glacier Melt".  According to the NY Times article "... the IPCC, the U.N. body charged with investigating climate change, retracted that claim after it emerged that its predictions of a sudden melt weren't based on peer-reviewed evidence, but instead on an article that appeared in the popular science magazine New Scientist in 1999."  More evidence that the U.N. based it's political agenda for Cap-n-Trade on junk science.
 
Peter Foster writing in Canada's National posts goes on to say, "the error showed how the IPCC's task has always been not objectively to examine science but to make the case for man-made climate change by any means available."
 
According to the International Baccalaureate's official web site, the 2011 Geography syllabus states that it is designed to encompass U.N.'s millennium development goals.  Global warming is listed as on one of those goals.
 
This is the problem that occurs when a school decides to adopt a program that's riddled with an agenda from a political organization.

It seems to me that if we seek to graduate students who are proficient in science, it would be worthwhile to leave the U.N. junk science out of the equation.  Why push a political agenda at the expense of authentic science?

All one has to do is visit the IB web site: http://www.ibo.org/facts/annualreview/2008/documents/IBReview08.pdf and go to page 12 and read it for yourself. 

January 23, 2010

Thoughts on Obama's "Race To The Top" in Education

Remember when everyone was upset at George Bush for the "No Child Left Behind" initiative?   I wonder how many people realized that this Federal initiative was also supported by the late Ted Kennedy? THE EDUCATION FRONT Blog | The Dallas Morning News
 
We heard cries from NEA - No Child Left Behind cemented as failed education legacy of President Bush the NEA??  Remember how they criticized NCLB, but always failed to mention that this had bi-partisan support?
 
Well now that they have their "guy" in office, you'd think he'd abolish NCLB to correct those dreadful errors from the Bush administration.  You'd be wrong. National Journal Online - Duncan: NCLB On Congress' Agenda This Year
 
Looks like the Obama administration is poised to reauthorize what they see as a failed policy from the Bush administration.  Bad news for the NEA.
 
The NEA isn't having such a good year with the Obama folks in the White House.  After revealing the goals on a new education funding scheme (Race to the Top...aka...RttT), the Feds will be tying some of the Federal Ed. dollars to teacher performance.  NEA Slams Obama's $4.35 billion "Race to the Top" initiative | ALA Connect While some may see this as a good idea, I happen to think the NEA is right on this one.
 
There are many problems in public education, however there are two that are some of the biggest concerns that need reformed.  Unfortunately I don't see how RttT will alleviate these problems.
 
The first problem that needs to be addressed is, the lack of quality teacher training in the Schools of Education.  Race To The Top And K-12 Mathematics Education « Math Wizards  Some of our top mathematicians in the country sent a letter to Secretary Arne Duncan highlighting this problem in education.  They want the Federal funds to go towards educating the teacher in math content.  Some might be surprised by this suggestion.  The reality is that our Schools of Education have done a miserable job of preparing our teachers in academic content.
 
Look at the courses required for students in the Schools of Education.  Many of the classes they are required to take are in pedagogy.  There is little emphasis on content.  Colleges of Education focus too much on how to teach and not enough on the subject matter « Math Wizards

Compare this to the training teachers receive in the Schools of Ed in top performing countries where the focus is on academic content.  Baltimore Curriculum Project
 
There's another problem in education that is not being addressed by the RttT funds and that's textbooks/curriculum that lack good academic content.  So many of our textbooks and curriculum have serious gaps in knowledge.  EveryDay Math « Math Wizards
 
Often times teachers are required to use the chosen textbooks giving the teachers little freedom to stray from the assigned curriculum.  Focus on Curriculum, Not Merit Pay, Charters, etc « Math Wizards
 
So tying Federal funds to students passing a test seems like we are missing a real opportunity to fix what's broken.  But then again when has any govt. program fixed what's broken?

January 6, 2010

Why do we pay for so many Administrators? vs Teachers?

Dear Editor:

I presented budget concerns to our local board members recently in an e-mail.  
 
My e-mail addressed spending on the numerous administrators. (non-teaching staff)  I  questioned the necessity of these positions along with the recent proposals to renovate McKelvie School.  My e-mail to the board members addressed these TWO spending initiatives.  
 
I also asked how private/Parochial schools function with buildings in need of dire repair?  How do these schools function without an abundance of non-teaching administrators?  I suggested the Board members visit these schools and talk to the principals and ask them how they are able to put out a quality product without the additional "spending".  
 
I did get two replies indicating Bedford has to provide transportation, special ed services, etc.  I never addressed those costs in my e-mail because those are costs that are needed to run this school district.   I suspect from their response, my message wasn't fully comprehended.
 
Don Graff did send a gracious reply indicating he understands my concerns.
 
In Bedford we have a Superintendent, Curriculum Superintendent, Math/Science Coordinator, Math Coach, Assessment Specialist, Behavior Specialist, School to Career Coordinator, School to Work Coordinator, Community Youth Worker, Deans, Integration Specialist and a Writing Coach.  In the private schools you will not find many of these administrative positions yet they manage to educate students for a path to college or an entry level job.
 
Buildings need to be maintained.  They need heat they need a roof that doesn't leak.  Voters understand this.  However when a Principal says he wants to change the cosmetics because a student who comes to the Principal's office doesn't get privacy sitting on a bench in the hallway, that sounds completely out of touch with what is going on in this economy.
 
These are concerns that all voters need to consider.
 
On top of these costs, we continue to pay for the International Baccalaureate program that not only seeks to politically indoctrinate the students, it also undermines U.S. sovereignty by carrying forward a United Nations agenda within the curriculum.  In the new budget, we will now have to pay for an IB Coordinator.  So while schools around the country abandon this program due to the excessive costs, fleecing the Bedford taxpayer forges ahead.
 
When the school comes to the voters with their hands out, these might be issues one considers in the voting booth!
 
Sincerely,

Ann Marie Banfield

December 13, 2009

Ann Marie on Capital Access talking Education

Ann Marie writes here on the 'Grok fairly often, mostly on educational issues.  She is also becoming well known around the State of NH as the Educational Liason for Cornerstone Policy Research, a conservative, pro-family, free-market think tank here in NH.

She was recently on Capital Access talking about the International Baccalaureate education program backed by the United Nations.  Topics include the underlying philosophies, the costs, the impacts on families, and the controversies surrounding the program.


She also brings up a site to visit: TruthAboutIB.com.

December 2, 2009

Money in Education?

The City University of New York was a great conduit for upward mobility through the early and middle  decades of the 20th century, with a glittering list of alumni in law (Felix Franfurter), science (Jonas Salk), the military (Colin Powell), and other fields of endeavor.  Sad, then, to read that 90% of CUNY freshmen could not solve a simple algebra problem when tested in 2008.  Even arithmetic baffled them: Two-thirds could not convert a fraction to a decimal.  This is after years of news stories about improved test scores and graducation rates for city schools.  The usual response from local politicians is that the school system needs more money.  Odd: New York State, with the city well in line, spent $15,981 per public-school student in 2007.  The U.S. Average is $9,666 – just three-fifts of the New York figure.  The city is in any case flat broke, with the mayor demanding 8 percent budget cuts.  What's to be done? Ship students to Utah, perhaps.  The Beehive State spent only $5,683 per student, yet math-test results are well-nigh identical with New York's

(H/T: National Review, P12, 12/7/09)

November 27, 2009

Every time you look at a teacher, remember this NEA

Bob Chanin, retiring NEA General Counsel, spoke at the NEA's annual meeting in July. He had quite some words, I'd say, for the real purpose of the NEA.  Knowing me and knowing the 'Grok, you know where this is going, don't you?

Chanin makes unmistakably clear what the highest priority is for the union. Hint: It's not the education of your kids.

Chanin closed his nearly 25-minute speech by explaining the influence of the NEA:
Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.
Well, that makes it clear - the "apple for the school marm" mystique is gone for me (heh!).  Here, someone who served for DECADES finally tells the truth: it is about the union and NOT about the kids.  Teaching is not the highest calling, only power.
And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.

Their interests - the union's interests, which may or may not be aligned with teachers and may well not be aligned with what parents desire for there kids.

Remember folks, this is not me just blithering - this is a major player in the NEA hierarchy.

 

Oh, it gets more interesting.
This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing dropout rates, improving teacher quality and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary. These are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights and collective bargaining. That simply is too high a price to pay.
Too high a price to pay for educated children. Chanin got wild applause from thousands of NEA members at the San Diego Convention Centerfor his remarks.

 


(H/T: Chicago Tribune)

November 14, 2009

"You can have rigor, without the indoctrination"

 UN flag.public school.UN flag

'Grok contributor Ann Marie appeared on the most recent Capitol Access TV program to discuss the International Baccalaureate Programme being foisted on hapless students in some government schools.

Great job, Ann Marie!

This is how our friend Jane, a retired schoolteacher described IB in a prior post on the subject

“These are politically motivated programs devised by the United Nations and centered out of Geneva, Switzerland, geared more toward the acclimation of students as early as the age of 3 into the role of ‘global citizens’ subject to the rules of ‘global government’ as laid out by UN documents such as the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Earth Charter, and Agenda 21.”

“Like the Goals 2000 and the No Child Left Behind Act before it, IB schools attempt to instill an early acceptance of these UN ‘world government’ standards and defies local control. These teachings about governmental loyalties are directly contrary to our US Constitutional government and our country’s national sovereignty. These programs seem more about restructuring society and changing attitudes, than educating, and their founders are very up front about it. Even the tests children take would be graded in Geneva.”

And of course, Ann Marie has written about it in several posts as well. In this recent piece, she notes,

While this program doesn't sell itself as a political indoctrination program for your children, that is exactly what it intends for the students who participate.  Click here to read exactly how the IBO plans on carrying out some of the UNESCO agenda through the IB program.

November 5, 2009

Pap by any other name is still that...

 UN flag.public school.UN flag

When I most recently inquired as to the status of the so-called “International Baccalaureate Programme” (IB) and its implementation in my home town of Gilford, I was told that it had pretty much been shelved.  This was certainly welcome news to those of us that have been concerned for some time about this latest fad about to be foisted on the town’s unsuspecting students.

For those not familiar with the subject, let me again recount how our friend Jane, a retired schoolteacher described it in a prior post on the subject

“These are politically motivated programs devised by the United Nations and centered out of Geneva, Switzerland, geared more toward the acclimation of students as early as the age of 3 into the role of ‘global citizens’ subject to the rules of ‘global government’ as laid out by UN documents such as the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Earth Charter, and Agenda 21.”

“Like the Goals 2000 and the No Child Left Behind Act before it, IB schools attempt to instill an early acceptance of these UN ‘world government’ standards and defies local control. These teachings about governmental loyalties are directly contrary to our US Constitutional government and our country’s national sovereignty. These programs seem more about restructuring society and changing attitudes, than educating, and their founders are very up front about it. Even the tests children take would be graded in Geneva.”

And that’s not just simply the opinion of a lone teacher in the hills of New Hampshire. Early last year, Utah lawmakers decided against helping that state’s local schools pay for International Baccalaureate (IB) programs after one legislator called IB's philosophy anti-American.

“I’m not opposed to understanding the world,” Utah state Senator Margaret Dayton told members of the Senate Education Committee. “I’m opposed to the anti-American philosophy that’s somehow woven into all the classes as they promote the U.N. [United Nations] agenda.”

You can see why myself and others were relieved when we were told IB was off the radar in Gilford, not to mention the fact that this was simply more costs heaped on top of an already heavily-funded public education system. We must be sure we’re getting the maximum bang for the buck before throwing more good money for programs of questionable results, and on IB, when conducting a search of the Internet, you can certainly conclude that, at the very least, the jury is still out. At the worst (and, in my opinion, more likely), it is yet another failed educational fad.

“But Doug, what difference does all this make? You just said you were told it had fallen by the wayside for now.” Yes, but as we’ve come to learn when dealing with all things government, pay no attention to the words, and never take what is presented at face value. And, when it happens to be the educational sector of government, the double-speak often reaches new heights. “International Baccalureate Programme? No, we’re not pursuing that at the moment. We decided to just focus on more of what we’ve got going already, instead.”

Hooray for the school board! Finally, they understand. Focus on the BASICS. Er, not so fast. According to the minutes of their October 5th meeting, member Kurt Webber

 

Continue reading "Pap by any other name is still that..." »

October 15, 2009

The NAEP math scores are in. Looks like great news for NH... or is it?

 Diploma

According to the Manchester Union Leader:

"fourth-graders posting average scores higher than those in 49 other jurisdictions" AND "eighth-graders also showed improvement from the last time the test was administered in 2007, with a score higher than those in 44 states or jurisdictions"

It almost gives you a reason to celebrate, unless you dig deeper.

How many NH 4th and 8th grade students are proficient in math per the NAEP? 

56% proficient per 2009 4th grade  (up from 52% in 2007)
NAEP - Mathematics 2009: Grade 4 State Results

43% proficient per 2009 8th grade (up from 38% in 2007)
NAEP - Mathematics 2009: Grade 8 State Results

So we are celebrating the fact that barely half of the 4th graders passed the test and less than half of the 8th graders passed the NAEP?
 
I guess the good news is, we didn't fail as miserably as the rest of the country!!
 
Now when you compare the percentages of students who passed the NAEP (The National test) to the NECAP (the NH State standardized test) you will see a significant difference in the percentages reported as "proficient".  (ie...the state showed far more children were proficient than the Feds)

Let's look at the NECAP scores for 2008:

73 % proficient per 2008 NECAP 4th grade
65% proficient per 2008 NECAP 8th grade
32% proficient per 2008 NECAP 11th grade

I don't think you need to be a mathematician to figure out that the state told parents that 73% of 4th graders were proficient, yet the Feds are telling us that only 56% passed the test.  In 8th grade the Lynch Dept of Ed told us that 65% were proficient in math and the Feds said 43%.  Is this fuzzy math? 
 
What parents don't know is, there is an incentive to dumb down the standardized tests.  You can see it when you compare the NAEP to the NECAP.  This is a problem that has been addressed across the country. 
 
An article on the subject in today's New York Times quotes a well-known expert on the sad reality:

 “What this amounts to is a fraud,” said Diane Ravitch, an education historian who has been one of the most vocal critics of both the state exams and Mr. Klein. “This is a documentation of persistent dumbing down by the State Education Department and lying to the public.”

So before we go and give Governor Lynch a big pat on the back for a job well done, let's consider all the facts.  Let's understand that right now the NH Dept of Ed is using a measuring tool that misleads parents into believing their children are proficient in mathematics.  
 
Most importantly, let's not forget what our current Education Secretary, Arne Duncan said in an article from the Chicago Tribune

"In too many places....we are lying to children now. [When] we tell a child they are meeting the state standards, the logical implication is that child's on track to be successful. In too many places.... if you are meeting state standards you are barely qualified to graduate from high school and you are totally unqualified to go to a university and graduate," he said.

This is the grim reality. 

Let's save the celebrations for when we actually have a good measurement tool that shows the vast majority of the students are proficient... 

[Check out these sites to monitor math education in New Hampshire: Math Wizards and the NH Coalition for World Class Math]

October 11, 2009

Indoctrination can take many forms

public school

Recently many parents across the country expressed outrage at a speech President Obama gave to the American students.  Many were outraged by the thought of political indoctrination taking place within our schools.
 
That's fair, clearly we have the history of this taking place in the old Soviet style Communist classrooms and of course the Nazis used this approach.  Adolf Hitler once said, "He alone, who owns the youth, gains the Future."

I'm sure when Pres. Obama decided to take his messaged directly into the classrooms, many people in this country recoiled at what was about to take place.  Others thought people were overreacting, however knowing history, it certainly warranted concern.
 
What I found most surprising was, the fact that political indoctrination is taking place in classrooms throughout the country everyday, with little or no protest from the parents.   I suppose it's because they simply do not know it's happening. 
 
Let's look at the Bedford High School.  Many critics throughout the country have criticized the International Baccalaureate Program for carrying a political message of indoctrination within the curriculum.  This argument has been made by critics and can easily be found by doing a little research. 
 
If you look at the speeches by the founders and present leaders you will see progressive (leftist) thought. Former IB Deputy Director Ian Hill delivered a speech on the purpose of international education to the Disarmament Forum identifying the organization’s political persuasion.

Desmond Cole, the former director of the UN International School, and one of the key leaders in the development of the IB gave a speech which supported the idea that no war is ever justified - only the war on poverty, want and hunger.

The U.N. and UNESCO share the leftist ideals of redistribution of the wealth (for achieving “sustain-ability”), world citizenship, disarmament, and environmental policies whether or not scientific research warrants it. The solutions require that wealthy countries redistribute their wealth to developing countries through taxation.
 
So while this program doesn't sell itself as a political indoctrination program for your children, that is exactly what it intends for the students who participate. 

Click here to read exactly how the IBO plans on carrying out some of the UNESCO agenda through the IB program.
 
Another area of political indoctrination is contained in the 9th grade text book being used in the Bedford High School: We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution.  This book was written by the Center for Civic Education.
 
Some of the critics note the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as presented in the text, dismiss these important documents as "creations of our culture".  
 
It's also noted how globally accepted principles need to be promoted at the expense of the U.S. founding documents.  One would be wise to note that the book never treats fundamental liberty as truths.  This contradicts the Declaration of Independence "We hold these truths to be self evident".  The text refers to these as "ideas".

This review tells us that "While the book does mention the concept of "enumerated powers" as a historical matter (p. 70), it never mentions the one constitutional provision which today most clearly articulates this principle of a limited federal government. That provision is the Tenth Amendment."
 
They write: " the book treats our constitutional, unalienable rights as privileges which evolve over time. But the "rights" listed in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights are treated as universal principles that should be adopted in every nation. "
 
Political indoctrination may be easy to see when it comes directly through a TV screen and delivered by the President of the United States.  Unfortunately many parents miss the more subtle ways the schools indoctrinate the students. 
 
The question becomes, will students pay a price academically when the focus is on political indoctrination instead of academic excellence?

I find the indoctrination in the curriculum in need of more critical thought than any one time presidential speech.
 

September 25, 2009

Don't be fooled. A failed program by any other name is still that

 

We don't need no edgukashun!

A short while ago, the Union Leader reported that Bedford parents were caught by surprise as to how many students had to attend summer school in order to pass the new Competencies per the NH Dept. of Education. 
 
If you read the comments, you will find that many are convinced that "Competency Based Education" somehow improves academic quality in the NH schools.  This couldn't be further from the truth.
 
Competency Education is a new name for what used to be called Outcome Based Education (OBE).  Outcome Based Education was a new term for Mastery Learning.  You might be wondering, what's up with the name changes?  Well, it's tough to sell any program to parents when they can Google search it and find out that it's been a complete failure in other districts.  Change the name and you can re-sell it to the next naive community.
 
So what's Competency Ed...aka...Outcome Based Ed....aka...Mastery Learning?  The easiest way to get a good grasp of what's coming to the New Hampshire public schools is to watch the presentation by Peg Luksik on Google video,  "Who Controls Our Children part 1-6.  When you are done watching them, click on New Hampshire High School Redesign and go to page that says: Expectations for Learning are Changing and look at the list of NON-Academic outcomes. This is the vision for the NH High schools which is being promoted by Linda Darling-Hammond who was one of the folks in line for Education Secretary for President Obama (He ended up choosing Sec. Duncan)
 
In this article found in the Nashua Telegraph, a Litchfield student catches the absurdity of Competency Based education in a piece entitled, "Campbell High unveils new way to make the grade," noting how slackers will no longer have their homework graded.  He also reports that if you don't pass the tests, you may simply retake them!  If you watched the above mentioned videos by Peg, this will sound eerily familiar. 

This Junior in the Litchfield High School caught on to the dumbing down of Competency Based Education, but unfortunately, many others have not. 

But wait, there's more...In addition to the NH Dept of Education promoting this failed fad called Competency Based Education, you should also be aware of this: Redesigning Schools for the 21st Century, which they tout here: New Hampshire High School Redesign. Once you've scanned through that....check out the what the critics are saying by clicking here: Common Core - A Challenge to the Partnership for 21st Century Skills

One thing's for sure, the NH Dept of Ed seems to have bought into just about every fad that other districts long-ago found failed their children.  

 
Anyone with a child in the NH public school system should familiarize themselves with OBE.  It normally takes years for the public to see the negative effects of OBE.  Hopefully this information will awaken the parents in NH before too much damage is done.

 

September 23, 2009

Education system FAIL again?

 school

Over and over again, I see that our kids are not doing well in tests that pits them against the scores of students from other countries. That is a problem and no argument from me - the basics are not being taught or taught correctly.  Frankly, I'm no longer (and haven't been for a while) blaming the kids.  When schools seem to value social justice ideals instead of instilling a basic knowledge base of facts, fail to teach basic techniques of handling that knowledge base of information (and I'm not going to the next level, critical thinking), there's a problem.

Heck, I am fearful to see a test where it would show the scores of American students against those of international students in something that is particularly American in scope and nature: American History.

Assume: our kids are not dumb

Assume: our textbooks have sufficient material to teach the topic

Then why this result:

75% of Oklahoma High School Students Can't Name

the First President of the United States

And it doesn't stop there!  Oklahoma City News 9 has some results (I've done a bit of reformatting):

Only one in four Oklahoma public high school students can name the first President of the United States, according to a survey released today.  The survey was commissioned by the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs in observance of Constitution Day on Thursday.  Brandon Dutcher is with the conservative think tank and said the group wanted to find out how much civic knowledge Oklahoma high school students know.  The Oklahoma City-based think tank enlisted national research firm, Strategic Vision, to access students' basic civic knowledge.

"They're questions taken from the actual exam that you have to take to become a U.S. citizen," Dutcher said.  A thousand students were given 10 questions drawn from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services item bank. Candidates for U.S. citizenship must answer six questions correctly in order to become citizens.

And the results:

Question 

What is the supreme law of the land?    (28% got it right)
What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?   (26% got it right)
What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?    (27% got it right)
How many justices are there on the Supreme Court?  (10% got it right)
Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?  (14% got it right)
What ocean is on the east coast of the United States?   (61% got it right)
What are the two major political parities in the United States?   (43% got it right)
We elect a U.S. senator for how many years?    (11% got it right)
Who was the first President of the United States?  (23% got it right)
Who is in charge of the executive branch?     (29% got it right

I think it was only 2.8% of the kids taking this got 6 or more questions right - less than 3%!

That's not the kids fault - this can be blamed on the Educational-Industrial Complex.

One of my points of view:

Diagnosis: Teachers can't teach American History, or the Educational FAILureship Leadership in that state (and others) have deliberately decided not to teach what many of us coming through the system in the 50's, 60's, and 70's (which seems to be about the last time that our system was NOT failing our students).

The OTHER more IMPORTANT point of view:

All we here is that critical thinking is the capstone of an education.  What we see in the above results is a retake on old computer programming phrase "garbage in, garbage out".  Critical thinking, de rigeur in today's edu-babble speak, requires a solid, well fleshed out base of knowledge on which to operate.

And our kids don't have it.

And THAT will continue to lead to large problems; if our kids don't know basic facts of Civics and how this country is supposed to operate, then political leaders can lead them by the nose ("well, gee willikers, THAT sounds reasonable...").  Remember, most people do not understand the difference between free markets, socialism, fascism, and communism; how do they affect the relationship of an individual and the Government?  What happens to our cherished ideals of freedom, individual liberty, and the role of government?  Do they understand the difference a monopoly and a monosopol?

Side bar:  I do wonder what the results would be here of a similar poll. Elections are a year off.  Should this be a big topic in the races here in NH?

Oh, and for you that were never taught this topic or that you sure that somewhere in that far distant, misty past you did learn this but those nuggets now are stored in a cob-webbed, musty corner that you just cannot access them, the answers are after the jump.

Continue reading "Education system FAIL again?" »

August 23, 2009

State Education Department fails test

By Ann Marie Banfield

State Education Department fails test

Published: Friday, Aug. 21, 2009

The Cabinet


To the Editor:

The 10th Amendment of the Constitution states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

The federal Department of Education is currently working on drafting “common” academic standards. One might wonder why the federal Department of Education feels the need to set academic standards when each state currently sets academic standards.

It is true that all states set academic standards, however many failed miserably at this task. New Hampshire is one of those states. New Hampshire’s math and science standards ranked at an “F” per the Fordham Institute. Instead of finding ways to improve these standards, New Hampshire jumped on board with many other states, looking to the federal government to set academic standards.

One might believe that looking to the federal government is a quick and easily solution to this problem, however it leaves out a few important facts:

  • By handing this responsibility over to the federal government, we lose local control and further diminish our constitutional rights per the 10th Amendment.
  • We ignore the failed efforts of the New Hampshire Department of Education. Why can’t they set standards at a level of excellence? California, Massachusetts and Indiana succeeded in setting excellent math standards.
  • And finally, what happens if the federal government fails to set excellent academic standards? Since so many states have failed, what makes us think the federal government can do any better?

Right now there are some in the education community criticizing the leaked “Voluntary National Standards.”

The Core Knowledge Blog states, “A draft of the newly developed common core state standards purports to offer ‘sufficient guidance and clarity so that they are teachable, learnable and measurable,’ however the ELA guidelines offer almost no specific content and little that would be of use to teachers in planning lessons – or parents in understanding what their child is expected to know.”

Parents and taxpayers in New Hampshire deserve a quality education for their children. The New Hampshire Department of Education under Gov. Lynch has failed miserably. Instead of revising the academic standards like California, Indiana and Massachusetts, they shifted their responsibility to the federal government further eroding local control.

Parents and taxpayers need to be aware of this failure from the Lynch Department of Education. Hopefully with this knowledge parents will contact the governor’s office and demand quality standards on a state level, where they belong.

I encourage parents/taxpayers to visit two grassroots web site committed to excellence in math standards:

http://nhworldclassmath.webs.com/
http://mathwizards.wordpress.com/

It’s up to the parents and community to demand higher quality in our schools and from our State Department of Education.

August 4, 2009

Well, the Teacher's unions keep saying that merit pay won't make better teachers...

Maybe this really is to the point -  Hey local School Boards and Budget Committees, take a read of this great letter by Don Boudreaux (emphasis mine):

Here’s a letter that I sent today to the head of my local school board.

Ms. Kathy L. Smith
Chairman, Fairfax County Public Schools

Dear Ms. Smith:

I write as a Fairfax County resident and taxpayer to report on how you can save the Fairfax County Public School system – and, hence, Fairfax County residents – millions of dollars annually.

In a letter in today’s Washington Post, former Fairfax County Federation of Teachers president Rick Nelson insists that merit pay for teachers will not result in better teaching.  In other words, the prospect of higher pay will not prompt teachers to perform better in the classroom.  Briefly, teachers don’t respond to monetary incentives, or monetary incentives are so easy to game that using such incentives causes more harm than benefit.

Curious, that.  But, Mr. Nelson being a faithful representative of K-12 teachers in Fairfax, we must presume that he knows of what he speaks.

So if teachers do not respond positively to the prospect of higher monetary rewards, they are unlikely to respond negatively to the prospect of lower monetary rewards.  Alternatively, if the problem with merit pay is that measuring teacher performance is simply too difficult, then we can conclude that Fairfax teachers now are as likely to be doing a truly lousy job at educating children as they are to be doing an excellent job at this task.  (Indeed, if performance can’t be monitored, then chances are the teachers are doing a lousy job.  After all, why put forth effort if worthwhile results of your effort – or lack thereof – are undetectable?)

Either way, cutting teachers’ pay is unlikely to reduce the quality of education supplied in the County schools.  If teachers aren’t motivated by money, then they’ll work just as diligently at lower pay as they will at higher pay; if cutting pay will, in fact, cause some teachers to quit, their replacements are likely to perform no worse than them.

Having a fiduciary duty to run Fairfax County schools as efficiently as possible, you therefore are duty-bound to slash teachers’ salaries by ten, twenty, even fifty percent or more.  Fairfax Country residents will receive welcome relief from a heavy tax burden and our children will continue to receive the same quality of classroom instruction for which the FCPS system is famous.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux

heh!  Since I am a member of my hamlet's Budget Committee, I probably should circulate this to the other members of the BudComm.

(H/T: Cafe Hayek)

July 30, 2009

Drip. Drip. Drip. Slow but steady goes the decline...

 

 

Guest post by Karen Testerman

What Happened?

I have been pondering a question recently posed to me asking what happened to my state?  What is happening to our nation?  I was reminded - "My people perish for a lack of knowledge."   Hosea 4:6 But what knowledge?

Do you wonder why the polls of our youth today show a leaning in favor of homosexuality?   Perhaps we can find a glimpse of an answer here.  Just recently the National Education Association (NEA) passed an action item that amounts to an endorsement of same-sex marriage - as well as a call to oppose national laws protecting one man, one woman marriage.

The NEA is described as the largest professional organization and largest labor union in the United States,[1][2] representing public school teachers and other support personnel, faculty and staffers at colleges and universities, retired educators, and college students preparing to become teachers.   And they the people who teach at our public schools, have just passed an action item to endorse same-sex marriage.

Jeralee Smith is the founder of the NEA Conservative Educators Caucus.  Jeralee declared that the resolution will not stop at just endorsing gay unions. 

The NEA, financially supported the attempt to defeat Proposition 8 in California last year. Voters passed Prop. 8, which defines marriage as between one man, one woman.

The teachers have two alternatives. . . Teachers who do not want their money being used to support the organization's liberal agenda can attempt to become a religious objector - someone who can show that their faith puts them in conflict with what the union is doing. They can file to have at least some of their dues redirected to causes that do not conflict with their faith.  Oh really?  What about the recent legal cases challenging the teachers for religious expression?

A better alternative for these teachers is to join an alternative union that does not support causes that conflict with their deeply held beliefs and values. Tracey Bailey, director of education policy with Association of American Educators, said he wants teachers to know his group can also help with any legal issues.

But what can we as parents do?  How do we combat the "tolerance" mantra when we ask as did David Parker and Rob Wirthlin to opt our children out of these instructions?  Is it really legal to displace parents?

 

Continue reading "Drip. Drip. Drip. Slow but steady goes the decline..." »

July 8, 2009

You would expect something else from the NEA?

Little Red Schoolhouse 

Over at Betsy's Page:

The teachers union messing up a good thing
 
We've seen example after example of charter schools that have succeeded partly by requiring longer work weeks for the students. They come to school earlier and leave later and often have Saturday school. Such a regime requires, of course, teachers to work longer hours. And the unions can't stand for that. Jay Mathews writes of the plight of a high-achieving KIPP charter school in Baltimore that the teachers union is threatening.

Sometime last year, while negotiating a teacher contract for the KIPP Ujima Village charter middle school in Baltimore, founder Jason Botel pointed out that his students, mostly from low-income families, had earned the city's highest public school test scores three years in a row. If the union insisted on increasing overtime pay, he said, the school could not afford the extra instruction time that was a key to its success, and student achievement would suffer.

Botel says a union official replied: "That's not our problem."

Such stories heat the blood of union critics. It is, they contend, a sign of how unions dumb down public education by focusing on salaries, not learning. 

 

Contemplate that:  "That's not our problem."  If a politician had said it, it would be classified as a gaffe (a slip of the truth).

Read that again, and if you are like most, you'll wince again.  After all, we all want to believe that Ms. Teach is all about helping Johnny and Jane along with their studies, learning the basics while in school.  More and more, however, we see that unions do what unions do (even if it is a teachers' union).  It is not about what the union members do for work, it is about the power and who controls the work place.  It seems, no matter how we may wish otherwise, that parents see schools as classrooms while the teacher unions see schools as not much more than a factory shop floor.  Swap the kids for modern day work center equipment; they are interchangable.  For the union, it is about how the work is to be done and what do the members get.  Meritocracy?  Ha!

Again last night I had the chance to tell of my little practical joke on cashiers:  bring the items up to be rung in, haul out the bills, let them ring that in, and while they are looking for the change amount to pop up on the screen, slip in some of my change with the bills (e.g., if the bill is $2.98, bring out three $1s and then add in 3 pennies.) to 1) see if I can get rid of change as I hate having it in my pocket and 2) see if they can cope.

Everytime they can't cope right away (which is about 60% of the time), I thank God that I was in grade school 40 years ago....and just shake my head at the poor education these kids are getting today.

Especially as I just saw that NYC is now the higher per student cost in the US at about $20K per kid...with one of the highest dropout rates and poorest standards.....

June 19, 2009

The "ONE" Program: We Need Academic Excellence for the Classroom, not an Agenda

public school

Letter To the New Hampshire State Board of Education:
 
Good afternoon.  I write to you today in opposition to the proposed implementation of the "ONE" curriculum in the New Hampshire public school system.
 
While poverty in Africa is certainly a global issue/problem deserving of attention from the citizens of the United States, I have grave concerns that adding to the curriculum would again, reduce the amount of time students spend on academic content.  One cannot expect to add anything to the curriculum without subtracting from another area. 

I'm also concerned as to how this information would be given to students.  This is a highly political issue and like any other political issue, one can certainly sway children into a political ideology adding biased information or by leaving out critical facts.  
 
Too often our classrooms are becoming an atmosphere of political indoctrination. This has real ramifications on student achievement.  
 
The article I read today referred to giving students a global competitive edge by exposing them to the "ONE" curriculum.  I beg to differ.  What gives students a competitive edge in the global economy is academic knowledge.  
 
Right now New Hampshire has some of the poorest math and science standards in the country, noted in a report by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute.   
 
Our current Secretary of Education is looking to implement "Common Standards" to make up for this glaring deficiency in our public school system.  He's been quoted in the Chicago Tribune as saying:

"In too many places, including Illinois, we are lying to children now. [When] we tell a child they are meeting the state standards, the logical implication is that child's on track to be successful. In too many places, including Illinois, if you are meeting state standards you are barely qualified to graduate from high school and you are totally unqualified to go to a university and graduate."  

This is the time for the NH School Board to look for ways to bring academic excellence to the classroom, not a political agenda.  This is a time to go back and look to the best international standards and duplicate those instead of looking to form our students into a political mindset.

 

Continue reading "The "ONE" Program: We Need Academic Excellence for the Classroom, not an Agenda" »

Landaff's one-room Blue School: "Intentionally small"

Blue School

Recess at Landaff's Blue School

Guest post by Jeff Woodburn

LANDAFF -   Our vast, complicated education system produced its annual results last week as high schools across the country held graduation ceremonies.  In New Hampshire some ten thousand high school seniors were handed diplomas thus finishing a 13 year process at a cost of around $135,000 per pupil. Educating children has become a costly, centralized and specialized business, and it seems no one is fully satisfied with the results. Education experts and parents worry about the quality of instruction, class size and student safety, yet school districts have become large, impersonal institutions. Over the past 70 years, the number of school districts has declined from 117,000 to around 14,000 even though the student population has almost doubled reports the American School Board Association.

So there should be no surprise that New Hampshire’s once dominant one-room or tiny schools have dwindled to just two: one being Landaff’s Blue School (the other is the Croydon Village School, near Newport).

The path of preservation is never simple. It is usually a combination of circumstances and attitudes. Landaff is defined by a rugged, inhospitable or at least inaccessible landscape—most notably because of the prominent and protected White Mountain National Forest and the Wild Ammonoosuc River. With less than 376 residents spread over its 28 square miles, Landaff has the distinction of having the second smallest numeric increase in population of the any of the smaller communities in the state.  Since 1950, the town added just 36 new residents, including Jason Cartwright, who moved here from Texas ten years ago to run the Tender Corporation in Littleton. Now as a member of the school board, he says the Blue School, much like the town, is not just an anomaly or a relic, but rather is “intentionally small.”

The Blue School sits on a small knoll of land bordered by a stream, a simple baseball field and the intersection of two country roads. There is not a house in view, and little room to park. Parking wasn’t a concern when the school was built in 1858, the year of Teddy Roosevelt’s birth; the Blue School was one of six schools that served Landaff. Over time, the schools were consolidated to one. Former one-room schools, which dotted the rural landscape, were routinely sold off as transportation became easier and were folded into the existing housing stock.

A closer view reveals the building’s antiquity – like the hard wood floors, the large double hung wood stash windows, the thimble that once served the wood stove, old coat hooks in a small ante room that lead to the two small sink-less lavatories (there is shared sink in the ante room) with old tin signs above each. A second structure, a modern, modular building sits behind the old school house.  The two buildings are carefully joined by a roofed breezeway that ensures an actual and visual transition between the two. The newer rectangular building was added a few years back when there was a jump in enrollment. The numbers didn’t hold and the space now serves as the library and lunch room.  Instruction occurs in the large main room of the school house thus protecting the school’s rare status.

 

Continue reading "Landaff's one-room Blue School: "Intentionally small"" »

June 15, 2009

International Baccalaureate (IB). Not really worth it...

Educating for the new world order

Following the same theme raised in this December post on the topic, we now learn that Marblehead Massachusetts has recently rejected adopting the International Baccalaureate program.  According to a report on Wicked Local Marblehead, the school's committee expressed

"reservations about the IB program and will delay the implementation until 2013 for fiscal reasons."

The article goes on to explain how the faculty at MHS

"wishes to completely postpone IB and not invest any more money in it at all at this time or next year...is a rather expensive program to implement, and the faculty wishes to explore it thoroughly to be absolutely certain it’s worth the investment.” 

They also expressed concern over the "unknown fees" associated with the adoption of this program.  It's clear from the article, money could be better used on other priorities. 
 
Several school districts in New Hampshire pushed forward the same program in the midst of an economic crisis and yet other schools are finding it an extravagant program to adopt.
 
Feins, who is an English teacher said,

“Teachers who visited the IB school at the Cape earlier this year did not find anything we don’t already do or couldn’t more cost effectively add ourselves for the entire student body. During the training at Rice University, participants were told the IB certificate was not accepted at American colleges and universities; only by taking the diploma track will credit be considered, and this track will cost more money .  MCAS scores may also suffer."

As many of us have noted, Feins goes on to say,

"Advance Placement is a superior alternative, in the teachers’ view."

Schools like Bedford slipped in the IB program with little or no public input however in Bow the Superintendent conducted meetings and invited the public.  He listened to the concerns from the parents and taxpayers about cost and content and the people decided, thanks but no thanks. 

While some think we have an endless supply of money available to fund these programs, others like me question the fiscal irresponsibility during one of the worst economic times in our history. 


 

June 2, 2009

Might as well further destroy the alternative school movement while we're at it...

school

Just when you think things can't get any worse here in the Granite State led by the Democrats, we find out that, not content with just destroying traditional families and giving us a budget-busting, tax-increasing budget, they have also set their sights on the alternative school movement.

Writing in a "Policy Matters" report researched and created for the Josiah Bartlett Center, Lead Investigator Grant Bosse (AKA the NH Watchdog) tells us

An amendment capping charter school enrollment across New Hampshire could force hundreds of Granite State students out of their current schools. The Senate Finance Committee adopted a cap of 850 charter school students statewide next year, far fewer than are currently enrolled. The cap increases to 950 for the 2010-2011 academic year. If the cap is written into the state budget, New Hampshire’s eleven charter schools would not be able to accept new students next year, and might have to hold a “reverse lottery” to kick current students out of the classroom. And two charter school administrators worry that the cap might force them out of business entirely.

One way or another, everyone will end up in the government schools if the Democrats continue to have their way (except for THEIR children, of course, who will have the choice of attending some costly elite private school).

Click here to read the full report.

Elections have consequences. Thanks to a resurgent NH Democratic Party, fueled with out of state monies from far left groups, coupled  with a moribund GOP led by the hapless, do-nothing Fergus Cullen, this is what we get today. What else do the Democrats have up their sleeves? An income tax?

We MUST wake up, recruit and train good, electable candidates for the next election, if it's not too late. Ones with the brass it will take to do the necessary work of undoing all the garbage that has been strewn across our once great state. Democrat-lite, as offered by the moderates and RINOs isn't going to cut it this time...

 

 

June 1, 2009

The problems with constructivism in school

constructivist knowledge

Parents are probably hearing how schools are committed to a "student-centered" approach to teaching.  But what does that mean?  In Constructivism it means that your child will be participating in "discovery learning." 
 
In this setting the students work in groups or with other students, and the teacher takes on the role of "facilitator" rather than "instructor."  The goal is to get the students to come up with their own solution to the math problems (although this approach is used in other subjects too); and if the students have problems, they would turn to another student before asking the teacher.
 
This is exactly what is going on in many of the New Hampshire classrooms.
 
Reform/Fuzzy/New Math programs are generally built around a Constructivist methodology.  In 1989 the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) called for this approach to be used in the classrooms. 
 
Supporters of Constructivism will often say that this approach gives the students a "deeper understanding" of the concepts.  Yet the critics argue that students become frustrated and that it actually can hinder the learning process.

An organization called Mathematically Correct provides an amusing explanation of constructivism:

Continue reading "The problems with constructivism in school" »

May 9, 2009

Merrimack Valley Regional School District Forges Ahead With IB. Is this coming to a school district near you?

UN flag.public school.UN flag

Guest post by Jane Aitken...

UNESCO says that the International Baccalaureate curriculum promotes "human rights, social justice, sustainable development, population, health, environmental, and immigration concerns."

But are parents being told about this political agenda?

Missing from the presentation on IB on the MVRSD's website (http://fc.mvsd.k12.nh.us/ibpresentation) is the fact that taxpayers would be supporting the agenda of UNESCO. In fact, there's a lot missing from both the website, and from last Wednesday's article on the subject in the Concord Monitor. Allow me to clue you in on the rest of the story...

The International Baccalaureate Organization is one of many education "industry" groups of consultants and reformers. The industry recognizes our extreme desire to improve education and competes for the large amounts of taxpayer money we put toward that cause in NH. Promoters from the IBO (www.ibo.org) a Switzerland-based group in partnership with UNESCO (www.unesco.org) use words such as "rigorous," "prestigious" and "competitive" to sell the purported eliteness of it's program. This self-laudatory language is suggestive of academic success, even when no track record exists to support such a claim.

After a school is authorized by IBO to use IB program(s) and pays the "annual fee," it can be accepted as an "IB World School." IBO charges for using their "programs" (curriculum, teacher training, instructional methods, assessments done outside the USA, coordinator, etc.) in our schools in the U.S.A., which are then referred to as their schools.

The 2008-09 Diploma Program "annual fee" has increased from $8,850 to $9,150 per school this year.

The various individual "per candidate" costs (covering registration with IB, per subject fees, exam registration fee, per exams costs, etc.) have also risen. Schools are also required to have an IB Coordinator. What is even more concerning than the extra inflated cost is that the school and its teachers must all adopt the IBO's "mission."

In New Hampshire, the bulk of our local property tax bill goes to support public education and it's assumed that we have some "local control".  If the MVRSD already employs the most qualified staff they can find, why would they need to buy a program that is run from another country to provide "rigor"?  Tests are sent to any number of places abroad to be graded by the IBO. How does a student appeal a grade and how is this local control?

 

Continue reading "Merrimack Valley Regional School District Forges Ahead With IB. Is this coming to a school district near you?" »

April 28, 2009

Foundations...undermined by ..collectivism,...hatred of Western civilization...and rational debate

 

This was an eye-popper of a former career military now professor relating some of the moonbattery he encounters in his classroom when students rely on what is being taught by oppositely minded ideologues (emphasis mine): 

A few years ago I was asked by the instructor of a philosophy class, then titled “Roots of War,” to discuss with his students the culture of the U.S. military community. After identifying myself as a former career military officer, I discussed my impression of our military’s culture. When I was done, a young woman who had been glowering at me and holding her arms tightly across her chest raised her hand. When called upon she vehemently said, “I don’t agree with you. I don’t think it is anything like that. You have just been brainwashed by the military.”
 
“OK,” I said, “what do you think our military’s culture is like?”
 
“Well, certainly nothing like that,” she sputtered. I could see some heads in the class nodding in agreement.
 
I asked, “Could you share with us your experience in or around the military?”
 
“I haven’t had anything to do with the military,” she indignantly replied.
 
“Have you extensively studied the U.S. military or worked with current or former members of the military?”
 
“No,” she angrily said.
 
“So where have you gotten your impression of the military’s culture?” I tried to ask softly. 

“I am entitled to my opinion, and I think you are a Nazi!” was her voracious reply. The class was clearly enjoying her attack on me at this point and the philosophy professor sat smugly satisfied.
 
I decided to end this ridiculous exchange: “So let us review. You have no personal experience or knowledge of the military. You have not studied the military. You cannot explain why you disagree with me. And you think you are entitled to your opinion. Well, I agree with you on one point. You do have a right to an opinion, and I have a right to point out that yours is an ignorant opinion—ignorant because by your own admission it is not based on any facts, education, research, or experience. Your opinion is apparently based on nothing more than simple ignorant prejudice.”
 
The class was silent for a moment. The young woman began to sob and yell at me, “You can’t say that to me!”
 
I replied, “Yes I can, because it is the truth.” ...

There are a few more examples - stunning in their utter lack of noticing their lack of actual facts in attempting their poor arguments.

His sobering and scary conclusion:

Continue reading "Foundations...undermined by ..collectivism,...hatred of Western civilization...and rational debate" »

April 26, 2009

So, in spending 10s of thousands of dollars for your kids' degree and you only had to worry about uber-liberal Professors?

For years, parents have wondered why their normal acting kids came home from college acting like absolute MoveOn.org wackadoodles (hey, if Ray Buckley can use that term in describing Tea Party attendees, why can't I?) and blamed the Professors.

Problem is, as F.I.R.E. (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) points out well in this video, sometimes it is the Administration that is trying to not teach your kids the subject matter of their major but how they want them to think.  No, not just speak politically correct but make it mandatory to think politically correct or be ostracized within the collegiate echo chamber (star chamber).

We've heard of universities, even publicly funded ones, restricting where speech can be practiced on campus via small "free speech zones" (everywhere else is ruled ineligible) and restrictions of speech by ruling talk "offensive" (hmmm, I don't remember that word in the First Amendment) and therefore harrassment or inciting.  This goes much further.

Parents, this program was done at the University of Deleware where the Resident Life staff had a hundred page manual to browbeat those in the dorms that America was an oppresive society and beat politically correctness "tolerance" into them.  The problem is that among R.A. professionals, this was deemed to be a great model and has been scattered across the nation.

Watch the video - it is well worth your time (and is family friendly):


This is 1984 Thought Police tactics - what happen to the Classic Western Liberal notion of real free speech (and therefore, ideas)?  Who put these folks in charge of what is acceptable and not?

Freedom?  Such a quaint notion....

April 25, 2009

Passing NH's NECAP test? Great... you get an F!

Diploma

I hope parents are NOT breathing a sigh of relief if their children passed the NECAP assessment.  I don’t mean to be the bearer of bad news but the NECAP doesn’t give parents a clear picture of math or science proficiency. 

The NECAP is an assessment of the NH science and math standards.  Those standards were analyzed by several top mathematicians and scientists in the country and given an “F” grade. That translates to your child meeting “F” standards if they pass the NECAP. 
 
Our current Education Secretary, Arne Duncan in an article from the Chicago Tribune had this to say:

"In too many places, including Illinois, we are lying to children now. [When] we tell a child they are meeting the state standards, the logical implication is that child's on track to be successful. In too many places, including Illinois, if you are meeting state standards you are barely qualified to graduate from high school and you are totally unqualified to go to a university and graduate," he said. 


Secretary Duncan is making one thing clear, states like NH who set state academic standards at such a low level, are lying to children.  In a recent article in Time Magazine story, How to Raise the Standard in America's Schools, a similar suggestion is made:

“The result  is a K-12 education system in the U.S. that is burdened by an incoherent jumble of state and local curriculum standards, assessment tools, tests, texts and teaching materials. Even worse, many states have bumbled into a race to the bottom as they define their local standards downward in order to pretend to satisfy federal demands by  showing that t heir students are proficient.”

The question remains, why is our current Democratic legislature and Democratic Dept. of Education ignoring this?
 
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to acknowledge.   The students who meet state standards, according to Secretary Duncan are being lied to. 
 
What do the Democrats in charge of the New Hampshire's government do with this kind of news?  They submit legislation to legalize same sex marriage, allow for physician assisted suicide, submit a “bathroom bill” and seek to regulate the home schooling community-- a community that continually shows excellent results.  

The current leadership in the legislature has made it clear, radical legislation comes before the needs of our families and students.  Governor Lynch’s Dept. of Education is not offering students the challenges they need to succeed in life.  These are issues that need serious consideration from all voters these next couple of years.  If they continue down the path of pushing an extreme agenda over the needs of the NH residents, maybe it’s time for new leadership!


 

March 22, 2009

International Baccalaureate: Where's the tolerance? Where's the commitment to academics and academic excellence?

public school

Bedford High School offers the International Baccalaureate program for Juniors and Seniors.  Other schools in NH are also considering adopting this program into their curriculum. 

Bedford school administrators and board members have given their approval of this program but what always seems to be missing is, the controversial baggage that comes with IB.
 
How will teachers deliver a program containing such extreme political overtones?  The IBO makes it clear that the Administration must be on board with the philosophy of the IB program.

Looking at the IB web site raises many concerns.  For instance at the 21st IB Asia-Pacific Annual Regional Conference (http://www.ibo.org/ibap/conference/2006regionalconf.cfm) members of the IB community gathered to present topics on "values education".  
 
American students lack the competitive edge in areas like math and science.   How does "values education" address lack of math and science skills?  Who's values are they assessing and more importantly, what are the values of the IBO?

The conference included a presentation on "Values education and Becoming Fully Human".  Absent in the presentation is a focus on students achieving academic excellence.  What you will note is the reference to the increase of relativism and fundamentalism and the IBO's need to address this problem.
 
On page 10, the IBO criticizes religious fundamentalists by mocking their religious beliefs, "The assertion that we alone have the truth about morality and religion and everyone else is wrong."
 
There is a definite implication, that fundamentalism is a problem that the IBO needs to address.  Address where?  In the NH classrooms?  Do the fundamentalist Christians know that the IBO sees them as a problem that needs to be addressed in the classroom?
 
On page 29 it states that

"fundamentalism is as much alive in the west as in the east". 

Oh really?  In what way?  Because I'm missing the American Christians committed to suicide bombings.
 
In the next paragraph it goes on to say:

Continue reading "International Baccalaureate: Where's the tolerance? Where's the commitment to academics and academic excellence?" »

March 14, 2009

Self Education - do it!

This is the age of "continuous learning" - the time that most kids could graduate from high school, get a factory job, and be middle class for the rest of their lives, is well over and done with.  With increased competition, here and abroad, one has to stay ahead intellectually in order just to stay in place.  Change (the good change and not just the political stuff we keep hearing oh so much about) is constant - what you learned a couple of years ago may be out of date and the only person that is responsible for keeping you up to date is....you!

I just came across this site - Self Made Scholar - and it had a bunch of links to "free learning" sites.  No, not the trash diploma mills but reputable places - MIT, Yale, Tufts to name some Universities listed.  No, no degree, but if all you are after is knowledge, this may be the place to go!

There are some things that I'd love to learn more about (okay, what other activities do I dump to do so....hmmmm...this could be a problem....)

(H/T: Instapundit)

Speaking of "...the only person that is responsible for keeping you up to date is....you!..."; it brings back a memory...

Doug and I met on another radio show that broadcasts locally.  Shortly afterwards, there was a falling out between he and the host as the host blamed Doug for something that Doug didn't really do.  Even though I proved Doug's innocence (being an engineer who likes to solve problems, I created a timeline of events that made it clear Doug could not have done what the host, in a rage, had accused Doug of doing), the host kept raising the ante in a war of words...and Doug kept responding.  Yeah, this "principled" guy then not only tossed Doug but I could read the writing on the wall, too (and that's how Meet The New Press started - so the "host" has only himself to blame for his competition.  Funny how that keeps happening to him...).

So, what does this have to do with "lifelong learning"? Sorry,I digressed... 

During one show before this all happened, a gentleman (Dick from Goffstown, if I remember right) called in and he and the host were going on and on and on about how the Government hates the little guy (the discussion was about global trade and how jobs were changing).  The host kept mewling like a little kitten about "Who is going to take care of the little guy?!?  How is the little guy going to make it?  The government isn't taking care of me, is it?  Who is going to retrain me when my job goes away (he delivers newspapers during the week)?". Such whining and hand-wringing  from a dude (dud?) who otherwise maintained that smaller government is better and that self-responsibility is better than being taken care of by the government (two of his vaunted principles).  After hearing about those principles for over a year, it was quite the eyebrow raiser when all of a sudden he switched his tune to "The government HAS to take care of ME! (the implication of his words was that he was totally witless in taking charge of his own retraining).

Ummm, then I stepped in it - I rather crossly reminded him about his previous utterances and told him in no uncertain terms that only he was responsible for himself.  Nobody else cares, and nobody is going to spoon feed him anything if he failed to either keep up his own skills or learn new ones.  If he wanted to be ready for a new job, it was up to him alone and not me and my tax dollars (after all, I kept me going with my dollars and not his).  I carried on that I already had to have  re-invented myself several times as the world of computer programming had changed a number of times already - the mantra being "change or die". Needless to say, my message was not all that well received by the host or Dick.  And it turned out, as with all that ever crossed that host and made him look rather silly, I was not asked back for a few weeks - the take-away being, I guess, is that grudges in broadcasting last long as he's still at it). 

It is unfortunate that his show was never podcasted until just recently - it would have been great sport to go back and play it here.  But trust me, it happened.

'Course, I do wonder if he upped his skill set to do his own podcasting...

Naw, that'll never happen....

March 4, 2009

Guest Post: Be Wary of the International Baccalaureate "Programme"

UN flag.public school.UN flag

Your local education tax dollars may already be supporting the UN agenda

by Jane Aitken

The taxpayers of the NH's local school districts should understand that local education dollars may already or soon be used to support the United Nations/UNESCO agenda. The tremendous amount of money we spend on education in this country is not lost on the International Baccalaureate Organization. The IBO has not only found a way to nab this piece of our American Pie, but has found a way to influence our students politically. It's a sweet deal, for them.


What is the IBO? Because some school boards and parents have fallen for slick sales pitches fraught with educational "newspeak" such as "competing in the global marketplace", the Geneva, Switzerland-based International Baccalaureate Organization (www.ibo.org) in partnership with UNESCO (www.unesco.org) has found a real CASH COW within the U.S. educational system. The IBO is now trying to get its foot in NH's school systems.


After a school is authorized by IBO to use IB program(s) and pays the "annual fee," it can be referred to as an "IB World School." IBO charges for using their "programs" (curriculum, teacher training, instructional methods, assessments done outside the USA, etc) in OUR schools in the U.S.A., that are then referred to as THEIR schools.


The 2008-2009 International Baccalaureate Diploma Program "annual fee" has increased from $8,850 to $9,150 per school this year. (Note: There are different "annual fees" for IBO's "Primary Years Program" and  "Middle Years Program.").


The various individual "per candidate" costs (covering registration with IB, per subject fees, exam registration fee, per exams costs, etc) have also risen.


In NH, the bulk of our local tax bill goes to support public education under the assumption we have local control and thus, some 'say' about what goes on there. Why should taxpayers shell out more money to support interests from OUTSIDE the country? School boards, once committed to IB, are bound by IBO's 'rules'. The contract between the IBO and IB schools is bound by the "World Court".


There has been an ongoing behind-the-scenes attempt to institute the IB Diploma Program at Bedford High School. Most parents did not know this until after the fact.  Aside from the extra costs, some parents object to this program because of its broad political mission, which does not seem to include supporting our nation's unique and superior form of government. Much of the curriculum is centered around activism regarding redistribution of the wealth within and among nations. Belief in nationalism and sovereignty is considered 'poisonous'.


I urge parents to please find out all they can about this program, especially its values-based methods, overall philosophy, and stated mission which is to create acceptance for "global citizenship" under the United Nations, and to create acceptance of the United Nation's authority for governance of the U.S.A. under the UN's UDHR and Millennium Development Goals. A similar international mission statement and curriculum has been in place in some states' schools even before IB came along, thanks to Goals 2000. As a teacher in 1995, I was once asked, but refused, to sign a contract which stated that I "pledged to teach the mission of world government".


By all means, taxpayers should learn all they can before giving IB their stamp of approval.


Please visit www.ibo.org and www.unesco.org (and click on the Education tab) to see what this is about, in their own words.


Jane Aitken of Bedford is a retired schoolteacher who remains active in educational and taxpayer issues.

March 2, 2009

Another reason why people should consider home-schooling

We as parents and taxpayers often do not know what is actually being taught in our schools until items like this pop up onto the radar school - most often by sheer accident.

A child's story - "Trees belong to Everyone"

Let's see:

  • Teaching grade school kids with political/enviro-pap - check!
  • Disparaging the Rule of Law - check!
  • Dismissing the philosophy of Due Process - check!
  • Overbearing government - check!
  • Denigration of the Right to Private Property - check!

Yup, this is what is being taught in schools under the guise of a simple children's story book.

Hey parents - time to start asking the hard questions of your kids.  Better yet, start confronting the School Boards!  While this happened in England, I can certainly see this happening here.

  • Reading
  • Writing
  • 'Rithmatic
  • Indoctrination

Yup, all there! Go read it for yourself at An Englishman's Castle!!!

H/T: RightWingNews - Van Helsing had this as a description:

Here's the plot: A nice old geezer has a tree in his yard, and he lets kids play in it. But then he sells the house, and the new owner decides to cut the tree down. So the kids climb up the tree and sing protest songs, with the encouragement of their parents. The owner calls the police, but soon the mayor arrives to confirm that trees belong to everyone. The mayor takes over the house and the children play in their communist tree happily ever after.

Needless to say, children raised on this evil garbage are going to be slow to grasp that property rights are the fundamental basis of free civilization.

February 26, 2009

Depends on the definition of "stimulus"...

plums

A nice load of "plums" for the educrats that helped elect him...

This is a press release just in from the White House media team. Does this plan for education (laughably part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, AKA "stimulus") sound like it will do anything to help the economy... other than that of the educational-industrial complex?

WASHINGTON – Speaking with state school superintendents from around the country yesterday, Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan urged swift action and exceptional accountability in the disbursement of education-related recovery funds.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, signed into law last week, represents America’s largest-ever investment in education.  It provides funding to prevent teacher layoffs today and train the educators of tomorrow, expands Pell Grants and creates a tax credit to make college affordable for every American, and invests in proven-to-work early education programs.

“There is nothing more important to the future of our country than education,” said Vice President Biden after the meeting.  “This is an extraordinarily difficult moment for our country - but the President and I believe that the toughest moments present the biggest opportunities. The Recovery Act includes an unprecedented investment in America’s schools. Now it’s up to all of us to make it work.”

Vice President Biden spoke to the group following a productive working session during which Secretary Duncan solicited advice and answered questions from the more than 40 state and territory education officials in the room.  Additional school chiefs joined the meeting via conference call.

“We have an opportunity to bring about the dramatic change we need in education at the state level,” Secretary Duncan said at a press conference after the meeting.  “We’re going to first and foremost protect children. We’re going to create and save literally hundreds of thousands of jobs.  And we’re going to push a very, very strong reform agenda.  These state school chiefs are going to be my partners every step of the way.”

Going forward, Secretary Duncan and the Department of Education will work with state school heads to ensure efficient and effective expenditure of the recovery funds which include:

  • $48 billion dollars to help states balance budgets, with much of that money going directly into education.

  • $31 billion dollars in Pell grants and tuition tax credits to make college affordable.

  • $5 billion for early childhood.

  • $25 billion in construction bonds for school modernization.

  • $25 billion for Title I and Special Education.

  • $5 billion fund to push reforms and reward excellence. 
     

The meeting’s attendees also heard from Dr. Jill Biden – herself an educator for 28 years – who introduced her husband and spoke from personal experience about the importance of education to America’s future generations.

Doesn't this make you feel much better about the economy, now? Even though it might LOOK like your local government--especially the government schools, are feeling the squeeze & might actually have to eliminate waste and fat, along comes the Magic Obama and his merry band of Congress men & women to make things all better again! Silly taxpayers-- you really thought you were catching a break! And what is this "dramatic change at the local level" being promised, anyway? Be wary of big government pols bearing gifts...


 

January 27, 2009

Solving those really big problems here in the Granite State... like homeschoolers.

f grade

NH Math: "F"

How often are New Hampshire parents opening up the newspapers only to find out that our students are not performing well on state standardized tests?  This seems to be a routine headline in the New Hampshire press lately.
 
New Hampshire has state standards that have been criticized by prestigious organizations like the Fordham Foundation, which gave the New Hampshire math standards a grade of an "F". 

One needs to look no further than the State Academic Standards to get a glimpse into some of the problems facing New Hampshire public school students. The Manchester Union Leader reported that students were falling short on the NECAP math exam. This means that many of our public school students could not meet "F" rated math standards.
 
How do some of the New Hampshire Legislators respond to this disappointing news? By introducing legislation that seeks to restrict and regulate home-schooled students.

You might be wondering why a legislator would seek to regulate home-school parents when there are so many problems in the public schools they could be addressing.  That was exactly my reaction when I read the two bills proposed by Judith Day: HB 367 and HB 368.   
  
Why would a legislator propose legislation that seeks to regulate a community of educators that are outperforming public school graduates? 

Recently there was a study released by Strong American schools, which is an education advocacy group, that addressed a problem among high school graduates and how they are not being prepared for college.  One out of three college students are now required to take remedial courses upon entering college to learn the basic skills they were supposed to have learned in high school. 

It seems there are many red flags pointing to the public school failures.  It also seems prudent for a legislator to address these problems in the legislature.  Yet this year instead of tackling these pressing issues, we now have legislation that seeks to address a community of educators who are doing a fabulous job.  The home-schooling community.

I hope parents and taxpayers in this state will look closely at this legislation.  Not only does this seek to regulate home-school parents, it seems as if this will come at a cost to New Hampshire taxpayers too.  These are valuable resources that could be used to improve the public schools in this state.

This is a good time for NH residents to contact their state Representatives and Senators and encourage them to vote AGAINST this legislation and to ask them to look at our own public school community and seek ways of improving public school education.  


 

January 20, 2009

"We need to spend more money on education in order to improve the quality of education."

That seems to be the consensus among educators whenever someone addresses the problems in education.  The standard response always seems to be: education is under funded.  What many people do not know is, in one school district, this theory was put to a test. 

The Kansas City experiment is well known in the education circles however many outside probably never heard of it.  [Money And School Performance: Lessons from the Kansas City Desegregation Experiment]
 
A judge in Kansas City suggested that the school district come up with a "cost is no object" education plan then turned to state and local politicians to fund it.  This would be the big test to either prove spending more money works, or it would disprove the theory that so many critics had discounted as a real solution.
 
Kansas City spared no expenses and did just what they were ordered to do.  They increased teacher salaries, opened several new schools, and even built an Olympic sized swimming pool.  They lowered the student/teacher ratio to 13 to 1 which was the lowest of any large school district in the county. 
 
When all was said and done, the amount spent was 2 billion dollars. 

One would think after doing all that "needed" to be done, there would be significant improvement.  Unfortunately that was not the case.  The results were dismal. 
 
This experiment ended up being a costly embarrassment to those who once spouted the NEED for an increase in spending to improve education.  Scores did not improve and the racial divide did not diminish.  This was a set back for those who believed money would solve these problems. 
 
Now one would think that this issue would be put to rest given the glaring results that showed education did not improve when spending was drastically increased.  Unfortunately that is not the case.  Even today politicians and school administrators continually cite money as the main source of their problems. 
 
I would suggest that much of the problems in education boil down to a few major issues.  Sure there are others, but when you look past the "lack of funding" excuse, what you find are, curriculum problems, lack of discipline in the schools, and the loss of local control as some of the main problems.
 

Continue reading ""We need to spend more money on education in order to improve the quality of education." " »

December 17, 2008

International Baccalaureate Program (IB)-- Is it worth the cost?

Educating for the new world order

Families and companies all around the country are cutting expenses in these tough economic times.  Surprisingly, many state governments are doing the same.  I guess they figured out that spending like there's no tomorrow gets us in a financial mess. 
 
I'm wondering if our New Hampshire schools will be doing the same? 

Taxes have increased in many towns and now many residents are cutting their expenses.  It would only be reasonable for our school districts to do the same. 
 
Next year Bedford implements a new program in the high school called The International Baccalaureate Program (IB).  Other schools in New Hampshire are also considering the adoption of this program too.  IB comes at an extremely high cost to the tax payers and may benefit a small number of students.
 
Some schools report an annual expenditure of over $100,000 for this program while other schools have reported over $500,000 as their annual expense which includes hiring additional staff like an IB Coordinator. 
 
The Bow school district is considering this program right now, and hosted a meeting with the parents and taxpayers to determine whether or not they should go forward and adopt the program.  The community was invited and many expressed genuine concerns on whether or not this program was a good idea for the students given it's high cost and controversial political nature.  
 
The Concord Monitor reported in April that Bow had suspended the application after hearing from the "outraged" community.
 
Outside New Hampshire at www.Cherryhill.com in the article titled Debate Heats Up, the Superintendent is recommending phasing out the expensive program. Their annual expense is over $500,000.00 per year. The article goes on to report only 19% of the residents support it. 
 
In an article titled "Broughton's IB program to end soon",  the Wake County School district in North Carolina voted to also phase out the $500,000 plus program citing they could offer a quality education without the extravagant price tag.
 

Continue reading "International Baccalaureate Program (IB)-- Is it worth the cost?" »

December 13, 2008

And then there was another!

A few days ago, I put up a post that said that commented on the youth vote and that it would be difficult for the GOP to reach that vote.  Why in my opinion?  It does seem that conservatives are hamstrung right out of the gate because the leftward leaning position of many teachers in the public school system that have no problem in proselytizing politically and seemed to have perfused the curriculum with politically correct themes.

Well - I got corrected in the comment that was left for me:

...However, for every two leftist teachers there is one conservative.

Why don't you know this? Quite simple, conservative educators do not push their own philosophy on to their students, instead we want students to form their own unique opinion and analysis of issues past and present. Myself and the other conservative teachers I work with won't tell our students our thoughts on an election, political issue, etc.

So I challenged the commenter: If you are on the "inside", help me - what can be done to get this preaching to stop? Got ideas?

And the commenter decided to take me up on it.  Instead of putting up a comment, he sent me an email with an extended comment.  Well, it was informative and well written.  So much so, the 'Grok is pleased to introduce another contributor: Tim!

No problem, I have been a long-time reader of your blog, one of the best for coverage of central NH issues.

As far as what to do, perhaps you will let me sound off on education issues, maybe this will help you in your coverage on education issues.

Your blog has been hitting the nail on the head regarding liberal "constructivist" teaching strategies. Every college in the state (and I would imagine New England) preach this philosophy. In fact, you can not get a degree in education without drinking John Dewey's Kool-Aid. Conservatives and people who dissent with this philosophy have to put on a mask and pretend they are on board. In this sense, the education battle is really lost "on the beaches" before they even have a classroom or are employed. (Good luck trying to get a teaching position without preaching this stuff.)  So this reduces the number of conservatives in the classroom right off the bat. That being said, even in the NEA, nearly 1/3 of members identify themselves are Republicans. However, because of the tight control in college and at the administration levels, conservatives essentially must reside "in the closet".

Adherence to constructivist philosophy is the major reason why 1/3 of all 10th graders are basically illiterate and 2/3rds can't perform basic computations.  Yet why do they continue using it? Well they have "research" that backs up their "reasons" for its continued use. If you look at most major educational studies and dissertations they are based solely or in large part on QUALITATIVE data which is a very soft form of data "Did you like this activity?"

This is just anecdotal, but it is my impression that the liberal politicking you see the most occurs from elementary school teachers, those that do not have to be content specialists. Elementary school teachers only have to pass the PRAXIS I, which is a basic literacy, arithmetic, and writing exam. In addition to pasing the Praxis I, middle and high school teachers have to pass a test called PRAXIS II in their content area to prove they are competant and well-versed in their subject.  You would not believe the number of prospective teachers that fail the PRAXIS I, this is one reason why many teachers are of the mind-set that testing is evil.

If K-8 schools would adopt something similar to E.D. Hirsch's Core Knowledge curriculum (http://coreknowledge.org) which contains specific content that students must learn at each grade level, it would increase the rigor and expectations placed on both staff and students. Problem is, elementary school teachers are barely passing the PRAXIS I, how can we expect them to know, let alone teach Core Knowledge? So instead, elementary school teachers do "feel-good" activities, preach socially liberal ideas, and ignore actual content. By the time students reach upper levels, it is no wonder why they can't understand a reading on Government, History, etc.  when they don't know the vocabulary and concepts embedded into the reading. (Imagine reading an article on computer networking but you do not know what Windows, cat5, wi-fi, and IP address mean.) Sure they can read the words, but they don't know what they mean!

Which brings us to administrators. First, we conservatives have to abandon the notion of "local control". First for pure budgetary reasons. Pretend you are at the Tilton Diner (right at exit 20 on I93), go 10 miles in any direction and you have a different school district! (Franklin, Winnisquam, Belmont, Gilford, Laconia, Newfound, Merrimack Valley) That's 7 different SAU's EACH with a superintendent earning $90-120k per year and each with  a SAU support staff of 10-15! Count up benefits, and retirement contributions and that is at the cost of approximately 1 million per year for each school district. Talk about bloat!  That's over 7 million per-year for workers that have no direct contact with students. That is not even counting consultants that each district hires. Yet when budget season comes around all of this is overlooked by most voters, instead teacher contracts get the most scrutiny as it is the largest budget line, but at least teachers have direct contact with students. Next budget season ask about staff that do not work directly with students (usually at an SAU office) and ask them to compare that portion of the budget with 10 years ago......one district I know went from 4 employees in this situation to 16.  Maine has been consolidating their school districts and closing schools to get these costs in check, why couldn't one SAU handle both Winnisquam and Franklin heck or even all of those districts!

Next, each superintendent has their own "vision" which features more levels of constructivism as they try to make their mark. This the equivilent of a liberal "arms-race" as most superintendents try to make a name for themselves they adopt more radical intiatives, check out "Follow the Child".

Sadly, as these are all long-term solutions. Short-term, what can be done to curtail the left-of-center teachers. A lot of school boards in central NH have policies regarding politicking by employees, call the SAU, or the school itself if you witness this, teachers will get called onto the carpet on this even by liberal administrators if they receive a specific complaint. I've seen this happen in the school I work at. However, that obviously won't make the issue go away, but it can put some heat on the biggest offenders.

Sorry for the very long, meandering rant. I do hope this helps and keep up the good work! 

It certainly seems that the "diversity" message that the schools keep churning out is only skin deep - philosophical differences seem to be anathema to the hiring administrations or co-workers.  And trust us, we ARE looking at much of the budget.

No, you keep up the good work, Tim.  And yes, Tim is a pseudonym so as to protect the innocent.  That said, we are sufficiently convinced he is authentic NH based educator such that we have asked Tim to start a series "Insights from the Inside" on a basis that fits his schedule (hey Tim, once you start blogging, it's hard to stop!).  

The 'Grok is sure that our educational system needs help and in a lot of ways.  There will be no one sure-fire method that will fix all situations.  That said, with Tim and our other educational contributors, Jane and Anne Marie, we are hoping to give more visibility to an area that most conservatives gave up on long ago.  To our detriment - not only as a country but philosophically as well.

And now, we're not. Tim - more, and faster please!

December 6, 2008

Invited, then disinvited...

Unions - a prickly sort of organization, especially the teacher kind.  Seems they don't take lightly to criticism, especially when it is dead on:

Breen's teachers union cartoon

The San Diego Union-Tribune reported that its Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist, Steve Breen, had been invited to speak about his work to students of Sunset View Elementary School. But the invitation was rescinded soon after the accompanying Breen cartoon was published in the Union-Tribune’s December 3 edition.

Hot Air has already picked up the story, but wouldn’t it be great if blogs all over the country posted the Breen cartoon in protest? I don’t know how to create a viral Internet movement, but I think it would be awesome.

We're obliged to assist!

(H/T: EIA Online)

December 3, 2008

And politicians keep us believing that bigger loans make college more affordable

One of the biggest changes since WW II has been the participation of ordinary citizens in higher education.  The G.I. Bill made it far easier for working men and women to get a degree or more technical training - albeit, at the public expense.  Which is fine by me (up to a point and dollar amount).  From the New York Times:

The rising cost of college — even before the recession — threatens to put higher education out of reach for most Americans, according to the annual report from the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.

Over all, the report found, published college tuition and fees increased 439 percent from 1982 to 2007, adjusted for inflation, while median family income rose 147 percent. Student borrowing has more than doubled in the last decade, and students from lower-income families, on average, get smaller grants from the colleges they attend than students from more affluent families.

“If we go on this way for another 25 years, we won’t have an affordable system of higher education,” said Patrick M. Callan, president of the center, a nonpartisan organization that promotes access to higher education.

So, when Politicians try to woo you with the promise of "we have to make college more affordable - make the loans easier to get!", don't believe them.  Sure, they are making paying the bill at the time easier - but that is not the same as affordable.  Neither are bigger or more grants - while that means that the student or the family doesn't have to pay the bill, the rest of us do.  That still doesn't make the price cheaper.

All this means is that while the politicians may be raising the floor, the colleges with their bloated staffs are raising the ceiling on expenses even faster.  Affordable will actually have to mean lowering that ceiling so that the overall cost is lower.  Merely changing the delta between the two doesn't cut it - that floor still has to get paid somehow...

(H/T: Phi Beta Cons)

December 2, 2008

Accountability - one road to success in education

It is well known that the number one facet of success in school is parental involvement.  Looking at the story below, it does seem that the educational system has taken it to heart and enforcing it.  From STACLU:

Your Governments Schools In Action….Actually, This Sorta Makes Sense

When I first caught the brief news blurb on this story, it made me think of the Nanny State and how they force involvement. Second thought, maybe this isn’t too bad

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — An Indianapolis elementary school treats parental involvement just like homework - and if a student’s parents fail to meet strict expectations, their child can be shipped to another school.

Indianapolis Public School 57, the city’s only so-called “fundamental school,” requires parents to sign their children’s homework every day, volunteer at the school and respond to teachers’ calls or notes within 24 hours.

Teachers sign similar agreements, and the school’s 210 students have strict rules, too, The Indianapolis Star reported. If students don’t turn in homework for several days, for example, they can earn enough demerits to kick them out of the school.

Students living in several east side neighborhoods are automatically assigned to School 57, but those who don’t agree with the rules can transfer to another school with no questions asked.

Parents having to be be involved with their children’s schooling if they want their kids to stay in the school? Homework has to be turned in? Excellent! On the flip side, it says something about our education system and many parents that they have to be forced to be involved with their kids’ education, eh?

My problem is exactly that - the parents.  Look, I rag on unions and the education-industrial complex (did you know that we really do spend more overall on education than on the military [war expenses exempted]), but it is true that having the parents deeply involved in their childrens' school work is the major indicator of success - and that cost is a zero dollar expenditure.  What it does cost is major time involvement of the parents (and in no small way, the school system in checking).

I do like the accountability factor - and it seems three-way: students, parents, teachers.  

Now, if we knew what their curriculum was too.... 

November 21, 2008

Do you really know how our civics / political system works?

As Doug showed here, a lot of Obama voters knew neither the issues, the politicians, or which  politicans had stood where or said what on the issues (and yes, I am quite sure that there are comparable examples on our side, too).

I think it can be said that our American society would be better served if the voters DID know more about what each election meant with regard to the philosophical stances of the politicians and their utterances.  That said, it would also be better that voters better understand what undergirds those elections - how does our system operate?

At one of the Ed-Blogs I read, Intercepts, had a post about an online civics test that is being hosted by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute.  Elections can have (are?) miserable outcomes if we, as voters, have no idea what our foundational system is?  How many of our fellow voters know the difference between free market vs planned economies, socialism vs individual freedoms, the branches of government and the role of each in different areas of governance?  What is some of the history of our country that has both defined and changed those relationships as we seem to tip from one side to another as if we were a multi-dimensional dradle?

Anyways, go take the test!  Report back here how you did!

And yes, I did better than most but not as well as I had hoped (but no all-nighter either!):

You answered 27 out of 33 correctly — 81.82 %

Average score for this quiz during November: 78.4%
Average score since November 20, 2008: 78.4%

And yes, you do get the answers to the questions that you missed.

=============================================

UPDATE: I guess I shouldn't feel so bad about my score:

From Slashdot: US Officials Flunk Test On Civic Knowledge

A test on civic knowledge given to elected officials proved that they are slightly less knowledgeable than the uninformed people who voted them into office. Elected officials scored a 44 percent while ordinary citizens managed an amazing 49 percent on the 33 questions compiled by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. "It is disturbing enough that the general public failed ISI's civic literacy test, but when you consider the even more dismal scores of elected officials, you have to be concerned," said Josiah Bunting, chairman of the National Civic Literacy Board at ISI. The three branches of government aren't the Nina, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria?

November 17, 2008

The first step to improving math education in NH is by changing the math standards. Why is this not a priority of the Lynch Administration or the Democrats who now control the legislature in New Hampshire?

f grade

I wonder how many parents are sitting around the kitchen table trying to  help their children with their math homework.  It used to be that children in elementary school could come home and if they needed help, they could turn to their parents.  With the infusion of New or Fuzzy mathematics in many of the New Hampshire classrooms, many parents have no idea how to help their kids.  
 
First let's look at WHY this seems to be sweeping this state like the plague.  For those who do not know how the No Child Left Behind Act works, essentially schools are now held accountable to state standards.  Not a bad idea to have accountability among our public schools.  The problem is that many of our states have set poor academic standards, mathematics included.  The NH assessment (NECAP) is based on poor math standards per the Mathematicians at the Fordham Foundation.    
 
New Hampshire set the math standards and geared them in a New/Fuzzy direction.  Another name for this approach to learning is: Constructivism.  This is an ideology where the student essentially is left to discover math rather than giving them direct instruction.  In addition to believing children can discover math on their own, these programs introduce children to confusing and time consuming algorithms that many parents never learned.  There was no need to learn them, the traditional algorithm worked well.  What changed?  Some people think that learning four different ways to add, subtract, multiply and divide is a good idea. 
 
The problem is, many students become confused and often times, never fully master one of those concepts, leaving them deficient in basic math skills.  In addition to these common problems and because this is so time consuming, these student begin falling behind their peers who use a more traditional systematic approach to learning math.  Of course you also have the issue of parents who are unable to help their children with their homework.  This is even more of an issue for children who maybe in a situation where parental involvement is lacking or simply not there. 

 

Continue reading "The first step to improving math education in NH is by changing the math standards. Why is this not a priority of the Lynch Administration or the Democrats who now control the legislature in New Hampshire?" »

November 13, 2008

The children are the future. We must take care as to who is filling their heads and with what...

UN flag.public school.UN flag

In this prior posting, GraniteGrok's Ann Marie Banfield writes,

“As we try to play catch up to the Democrats, one area that continues to fly under the radar screen is our public education system.  This is a system that continually indoctrinates children into the ideals of liberalism.  This is a system that Republicans have virtually washed their hands of.  Yet this is the most pressing issue we face.”

She continues,

“It is hard to run behind this indoctrination program and do repair work.  It is best avoided when the indoctrination is not allowed to be conducted in the classrooms.”

Exactly. It is much harder to change something, in this case, ideology, once it starts to take root.

The Bedford mom-turned-educational activist asks,

“Where are these strong Republican leaders?  Are they at school board meetings each week?  Running for school board?  Forming a relationship with board members to give their input?  Supporting a Superintendent that promotes an apolitical atmosphere rather than a liberal indoctrination camp?  I bet they are meeting for their weekly or monthly Republican meetings.  All the while, the school board is voting in more programs that completely undermine the family, and every other conservative principle.”

“Where are Republicans on education?”

she wants to know. Of course, she does know:

“Many have checked out of the public school system and washed their hands of the mess.  Yet they send them a hefty check each year, paying for the rest of those kids to be indoctrinated into liberalism and globalism at their expense without one word of criticism.  How many of you would send $10,000/year to a company for nothing in return?   Not only NOTHING, but to do a job you are in complete odds with?  Yet that is exactly what is happening when they steal your tax dollars and dictate liberal curriculum in the classrooms.”

Consider the latest play presented by the school performing arts program here in the 'Grok's hometown. After reading in the Citizen newspaper of the rather-crudely named play currently being presented by Gilford students, “Urinetown,” that featured themes of “greed love and a ‘world without water’” I just knew it was yet another instance of leftist anti-capitalism indoctrination. All the buzz words were there.

“‘Urintown’ is an award-winning satirical musical comedy that pokes fun at capitalism, social irresponsibility, populism, bureaucracy, corporate mismanagement and petty small town politics.”

I’ll bet it “pokes fun at capitalism” all right. In addition, it carries the standard radical environmentalist agenda as well—After all, what public school activity would be complete without that? The Citizen notes that

 

Continue reading "The children are the future. We must take care as to who is filling their heads and with what..." »

November 10, 2008

Educating "subordinates" for the global economy? Is this what we really want?

We don't need no edgukashun!

Should students be able to graduate after completing 10th grade?  That is now being discussed in the New Hampshire Dept of Ed, as reported by some of the NH papers.  I sit here amazed that anyone would ask that question.  What's more bothersome is that we have adults, paid by NH residents, who think this is a good idea. 

NH Education Commissioner Lionel Tracy is now floating the idea of graduating some students upon completion of 10th grade.  He says that the test, which has not been produced yet, would be a difficult test modeled after the AP or IB tests and that 10th graders would have to pass this exam in order to graduate early.  Isn't the NH Education Department the same branch of government that thinks the NECAP is a good indicator of proficiency in math and science?  Yet we have some of the top mathematicians and scientists who have given their expert analysis indicating our standards are some of the worst in the country.  How can we trust the validity of this test when our own standards lack substance? Thomas B. Fordham Institute - Publication Detail

The article goes on to say that those who want to go on to prestigious universities can still graduate after 12th grade and take an even tougher exam.  That translates to lower expectations and standards for the graduating 10th graders.  On one hand Tracy says these 10th grade students who graduate would be held to high standards and have to pass a rigorous exam.  Then he goes on to say that the bar is higher for those graduating 12th grade.  If the bar is set higher for 12th graders with a more difficult test, logic dictates it's lowered for 10th graders because less would be required of them.

Why would parents want to subject their child to missing out on two years of education?  Especially since it is their taxes that have paid for it?  I did not notice anything about Tracy saying taxpayers would get a refund on those tax dollars saved.

This sounds like a cost cutting measure that once again, does nothing to help the students of NH.  It does sound wonderful for companies out there looking for full-time, unskilled workers making one wonder who Governor Lynch is working for:  the New Hampshire students and parents or simply trying to meet the needs of a global workforce.

 

Continue reading "Educating "subordinates" for the global economy? Is this what we really want?" »

November 8, 2008

Should Kids Be Able to Graduate After 10th Grade?

 

Diploma
 One of our educational contributors, Anne Marie Banfield, decided to give this article talking about NH letting kids graduate REAL early from High school a good fisking.  There are a lot of ideas and plans out there - do they measure up and are they sufficiently rigorous enough to provide a quality education for our kids.  Decide for yourself!

Should Kids Be Able to Graduate After 10th Grade?

By KATHLEEN KINGSBURY Kathleen Kingsbury – Fri Nov 7, 4:50 am ET

High school sophomores should be ready for college by age 16. That's the message from New Hampshire education officials, who announced plans Oct. 30 for a new rigorous state board of exams to be given to 10th graders.

My concern would be, is it really a rigorous exam.  The state exams based on the state standards are not what one would consider rigorous, so much of this depends on what they use as an assessment.  I'd be skeptical knowing the bar is set so low with the standards in math and science.

Students who pass will be prepared to move on to the state's community or technical colleges, skipping the last two years of high school.

How do they know this?  Many kids graduate right now who are not prepared for college because they are placed in remedial classes.  Again, I'd be skeptical especially knowing they are missing out on two years of additional instruction compared to their peers.

Once implemented, the new battery of tests is expected to guarantee higher competency in core school subjects,

Guaranteed?  How??  Who will be the person determining that these are truly higher expectations in competency of core school subjects?

lower dropout rates and free up millions of education dollars. Students may take the exams - which are modeled on existing AP or International Baccalaureate tests - as many times as they need to pass.

Lower drop out rates because they are leaving school early with the blessing of the district.  What are the chances of a 9th or 10th grader passing an AP exam?  And in all core subjects?  Is this going to be the assessment given to 10th graders?  In order to graduate early?  It says..MAY and MODELED on existing AP or IB test.  Will they actually be watered down?  Or on the AP level?  ie..authentic!

Or those who want to go to a prestigious university may stay and finish the final two years, taking a second, more difficult set of exams senior year.

WAIT, I thought the first set was difficult.  Now they are saying these are MORE difficult?  Raising the standards for those who actually graduate means lowering the standards for those who graduate early.  That clearly lowers the bar for the early graduates

"We want students who are ready to be able to move on to their higher education," says Lyonel Tracy, New Hampshire's Commissioner for Education. "And then we can focus even more attention on those kids who need more help to get there."

Sounds like cost cutting.  Get the kids out of the way.  Chances are if these kids are so smart by 10th grade, there isn't much the teachers and schools  have to do, other than correct their papers.

But can less schooling really lead to better-prepared students at an earlier age? Outside of the U.S., it's actually a far less radical notion than it sounds. Dozens of industrialized countries expect students to be college-ready by age 16, and those teenagers consistently outperform their American peers on international standardized tests.

YES, they actually have a rigorous curriculum unlike much of the fuzzy curriculum in the school right now.  It's like comparing apples to oranges.  If this was such a great idea, we'd have home-school kids doing this.  Although I think you can find some that do graduate early because so many home-school programs are rich in acaemics, normally they have to go through 11th grade, if I'm not mistaken.  The public schools come no where near offering the same kind of quality in their academics and test scores have proven that year after year as home-school kids outperform public school kids.

Continue reading "Should Kids Be Able to Graduate After 10th Grade?" »

November 7, 2008

If they have the children, how will we ever win?

public school

Democrat Parking Only?

Guest post by Ann Marie Banfield
 
I have been supporting the Republican party since turning 18 about three decades ago.  Over those years I've watched this party go through some changes.  Some of those changes have occurred over the past 8 years and unfortunately I think it's led to the self-destruction.

20+ years ago, we could go into a voting booth, vote straight Republican and know that we were getting, conservatives.  Today that is not the case.  We are now supposed to be a big tent where everyone is welcome, yet that didn't appeal at all to the voters yesterday.  In fact, it has just about pushed me out of the party all together.
 
We now have pro-choice Republicans.  Republican big spenders and Republicans who support big government handouts.  We have Republicans who dismiss their Constitutional obligations for Congress to vote on declaring war.  We have Republicans who support a United Nations influenced public education system.  Some embrace and promote the radical environmental extremism instead of gathering up facts and cautioning against legislation that cripples a company's ability to compete in a global marketplace.  Illegal immigration?  More support for a policy that is draining us financially. 
 
What has this done for this party??  Divide and conquer us.
 
It would be easy to blame this win on Obama lying about his record, or the liberal media who supported him.  But that would mean we would be missing an opportunity to learn from these disastrous mistakes.
 
As we try to play catch up to the Democrats, one area that continues to fly under the radar screen is our public education system.  This is a system that continually indoctrinates children into the ideals of liberalism.  This is a system that Republicans have virtually washed their hands of.  Yet this is the most pressing issue we face. 
 
It is hard to run behind this indoctrination program and do repair work.  It is best avoided when the indoctrination is not allowed to be conducted in the classrooms. 
 
Where are these strong Republican leaders?  Are they at school board meetings each week?  Running for school board??  Forming a relationship with board members to give their input?  Supporting a Superintendent that supports an apolitical atmosphere rather than a liberal indoctrination camp?  I bet they are meeting for their weekly or monthly Republican meetings.  All the while, the school board is voting in more programs that completely undermine the family, and every other conservative principle. 

Where are Republicans on education?  Many have checked out of the public school system and washed their hands of the mess.  Yet they send them a hefty check each year, paying for the rest of those kids to be indoctrinated into liberalism and globalism at their expense without one word of criticism.  How many of you would send $10,000/year to a company for  nothing in return?   Not only NOTHING, but to do a job you completely hate?  Yet that is exactly what is happening when they steal your tax dollars and dictate liberal curriculum in the classrooms.

Democrats play on the offense, and we try to win on the defense.  Until we figure out we need to be on the offense, I'm not seeing how things will improve.
 
Those who make it to Washington D.C. or their State Legislative offices cannot forget the core values of this party.  Those who get to D.C. and remain in their office, while thousands of their constituents march in the street for Pro-Life, haven't figured out who their foot soldiers are when it comes to running a campaign effectively.
 
Those who think they need to move in a liberal direction didn't pay close attention to the political races this year.  Many of the Democrats ran on Conservative principles like, tax cuts in the Obama campaign.  Or fiscal restraint in the Shea - Porter campaign.  We know they have no intention of following these principles, but that's what they sold to the voters in their campaigns.   In the liberal state of CA, gay marriage was rejected.   Sarah Palin drew more crowds than Barack Obama in New Hampshire!  These ideals are not dead.  They simply need to be re-embraced and communicated! 

 

Continue reading "If they have the children, how will we ever win?" »

October 19, 2008

And they keep kvetching about bake sales...

Yeah, America is really STARVING education:

The L.A. Daily News on its city's seeming unshrinkable downtown education bureaucracy:
    [A] Daily News review of salaries and staffing shows LAUSD's bureaucracy ballooned by nearly 20 percent from 2001 to 2007. Over the same period, 500 teaching positions were cut and enrollment dropped by 6 percent.
Also "2,400 administrators ... earn more than $100,000 annually." Want to fire some of the less useful ones? Ah, they have "'bumping' rights to displace other workers." ... 

Sure, it's just "for the kids".  Sorry, I'm just not buying it anymore.  When one drops 500 teachers (say $65K each -> $32.5 million) and indirect labor goes up 20% (and has a payroll for the above 2,400 -> over $240 million), it is no longer for the kids....it's for the money.

Cynical?  You bet!

 

September 22, 2008

NH students fail miserably on science test... a test itself that fails miserably!

f grade

 

[The following guest post was submitted by Ann Marie Banfield]

The state NECAP science scores are out and unfortunately NH students didn't perform well.  The 4th grade students in Bedford showed 68% proficient or better and the 8th graders showed 47% proficient or better.  Good thing the 11th graders weren't tested!   
 
After checking the Fordham Foundation's web site, science experts gave NH science standards a grade of an "F".  Which means that 1/2 of our 8th grade students couldn't meet "F standards.  Hardly comforting news to Bedford parents.
 
A few years ago I happened to hear one of our current school board members discussing how proud she was of the science curriculum in Bedford.  She mentioned all the "hands on" science the kids were participating in.  Now as a parent, that sounded like a lot of fun, but  after talking to several teachers in private schools where their students excelled in the sciences, the common warning was: look out for schools that use a lot of "hands on" science.  Kids need basic science knowledge and one way they stressed was out of the old fashioned text book.  "Hands on" might be a lot of fun, but they still need the core academic instruction found in science text books and materials.

Fast forward about 2 years and the NECAP scores now show many of our students are failing an exam based on low standards.  Between this and the poor math standards set for our students, I wonder if NH plans on graduating any kids who can go on to become doctors, engineers or scientists.
 
I keep wondering how we can spend so much money on education in this town and still get such abysmal results.  We pay large salaries to Curriculum Coordinators and Superintendents for what again?  These people have advanced degrees in education, but continue to bring in controversial math programs, science programs that do not meet poor state standards and an English curriculum that has also failed these kids.
 
At what point will we start demanding more for our tax dollars we send to this school district?  When the kids bomb the SAT exam?  Or when they get to college and are placed in remedial classes?  That's when the real assessments begin.  A little late, I'd say.

It's time for our school board to demand high quality programs in this school.  I hope that instead of rubber stamping controversial programs like Everyday Math that's been thrown out of countless districts, this board will look critically at these proposals and let this administration know we deserve a high quality education for our money.


Ann Marie Banfield lives in Bedford and is active in her children's education. She has appeared several times on the radio version of the 'Grok, Meet the New Press. Click here to listen to a podcast of her most recent visit.

September 19, 2008

So, you still think that Government Schools should have a K-12 monopoly?

Yeah, my previous post about the Brit send up of a government flack trying to justify his and his department's existence is humorous.  But like all good humor, all successful humor, it is built on nuggets of information that we all, deep down, know to be true.

While there are some bad parents out there that may make some bad decisions, to base a monopoly that controls as much money (about $500 Billion / year) as the Department of Defense on just that is silly.

I will also add, to the dismay of educational bureaucrats everywhere, that the military is successful when given a task to accomplish.  They change, they adapt, they overcome.  Most of all, they expect one thing: Results.  Or the generals (or politicians ordering them around) get fired.

So how come we don't see that in the Educational field (or very rarely)?  ESPECIALLY when the overall results are starting to look like this?  From Joanne Jacobs:

Christina Jeronomo was an “A” student in high school English classes; she thought she was prepared for college. But she had to take remedial English at Long Beach Community College, delaying her goal of transferring to a four-year college where she can earn a psychology degree. From AP:
. . . a new study calculates, one-third of American college students have to enroll in remedial classes. The bill to colleges and taxpayers for trying to bring them up to speed on material they were supposed to learn in high school comes to between $2.3 billion and $2.9 billion annually.
“That is a very large cost, but there is an additional cost and that’s the cost to the students,” said former Colorado governor Roy Romer, chair of the group Strong American Schools, which is issuing the report “Diploma to Nowhere” on Monday. “These students come out of high school really misled. They think they’re prepared. They got a 3.0 and got through the curriculum they needed to get admitted, but they find what they learned wasn’t adequate.”
High school was too easy, Jeronimo says. She wishes she’d been told to work harder.

Once again, standards mean nothing if the bar is too low.  Challenge the students by emphasizing the basics, demand achievement to a high level, and only then, add in the "elective" classes.  If the best high school students are not ready for many colleges as the above (and other posts here at the 'Grok outline), it is quite the indictment of our government run monopoly.

After all, isn't America all about competition?  Competition yields better products and services at lower prices.

Our educational leaders and the two main teachers unions, the NEA and the AFT, may deride letting parents have that choice to serve their own interests instead.  Why not be, like the military and the politicians, be held accountable once again to the public they serve?  What's wrong with pay for performance if they are turning out twaddle like this report is going to show and real world results demonstrate?

If you, the educational establishment, are failing this badly, answer me this - how can parents do much worse? Not much, in my opinion

Especially when studies are showing, more and more, that when parents take the choice of home schooling their children, those children are out performing their peers in the government schools?  After all, an industry has sprung up to service those children and their parents with products and services.  And they have to compete for the parents' dollars.  Making those companies just that much sharper at turning out better and better products.

Again, we will be discussing educational issues on our radio show, Meet The New Press tomorrow, 9 - 11 am streamed right here from the 'Grok (or listen to WEMJ 1490 AM if you are in the Lakes Region of NH).

September 12, 2008

Reading, Writing, and...hey, who's teaching the teachers teaching the Profs

public school

As I get older, I see that one of the things that have changed is the emphasis on the fundamentals in schools.  It seems that things like social justice, equity, community, service (and like minded attitudes) are getting more emphasis before reading, writing, and 'rithmatic. I have to blame this on my generation, the Boomers, that have taken the country to the Left.  Many of the more liberal that generation decided to "hide out" in academia and have ended up teaching and passing on their views to our impressionable kids (so parents, teach your children well!).  And then those self same "we all want diversity as long as they think like us crowd" have subtly put in measures so that while the outside check off boxes may all be filled (race, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, identity political group, socio-economic class, political orientation) without getting nicked in the legal radar. 

Problem is, diversity of thought, of ideas, is what should be of importance - and it is not.  All one has to do is to pick up the latest study of how Academia has sent money to either the Greens, the Dems, the Repubs, or the Libertarians and one will see where the culture sensibilities lie (er, it's not the last two, not by a long shot!)

And it is not changing.  Why?  As can be seen by some of the "suggested hiring questions", they have managed to game the system - after all, it is easier to the soul to hire those that think like you than not! And when the "system" perpetuates itself, you get tenureds like the Prof we like to call the Nutty Professor at our local educational establishment (who is so Liberal that he believes that the US should accede its sovereignty to that bastion of fine governance, the UN).

Here's a list of questions that are may be asked at the edifice of higher learning and indoctrination, University Of Massachusetts at Amherst, courtesy of its Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity:

IT'S ALL IN WHAT YOU ASK: SOME QUESTIONS SEARCH COMMITTEES MIGHT WANT TO USE

Search committees often have difficulty determining if a candidate is aware of and responsive to minority and women's issues and to issues involving the disabled and other groups requiring sensitive treatment. When prospective employees are asked, "Are you concerned about and supportive of these issues?", they will invariably give an affirmative reply. Unfortunately, that gives little indication of their level of concern or commitment. Asking some of the questions listed below may help you gain a better understanding of a candidate's position on these issues. Many of the questions suggested below do not have a "right" or a "wrong" answer. These questions should be asked by both men and women on the search committee because having only women or minority persons ask questions about these issues may give a candidate the impression that equity issues are not important to the institution as a whole. Many candidates will not have prepared answers to these questions in advance. These questions will, therefore, be useful in drawing out the candidate's opinions rather than the "correct answer".
Parentheses are used to indicate that one or more of the following words are missing: Minorities, Blacks, Hispanics, Native-American; Women; economically disadvantaged persons; disabled persons; veterans or disabled veterans; homosexuals, gays, lesbians; protected groups; affirmative action groups, etc.


 

Continue reading "Reading, Writing, and...hey, who's teaching the teachers teaching the Profs" »

August 5, 2008

Professional or just a union worker?

It's always for the teachers union children!

Most peoples' reactions to the word "teacher" is the kindly school marm (apologies to the other gender) smiling broadly at her little charges, apple on the desk (at least, that's my reaction).  For the individual teacher, for the most part, it works.

However, teachers unions, it's a different story.  No longer is it an individual face that a parent interacts with during parent - teacher conferences.  Now, it is one of the largest unions in the country and they do like to throw their weight around.  Perhaps others in town may not know, but the overall budget of the NEA is $345 million dollars.  Of that amount, the national organization will spend up to 1/3 of that on political stuff (e.g., ballot initiatives, media, et al).  The average compensation per NEA employee is around $196, 000 for over 560 people - not bad for "it's for the children".  And your tax money is the fuel for this salary structure.

What sparked this post?  Well, I've been kinda busy with lots of stuff and I've been adding to a stack of papers for a while; now that I'm on vacation, I'm trying to get caught up (yes, I am that bad / obsessed - but TMEW is quite kind and since the weather didn't cooperate, we bagged the trip to the beach.  Instead, we got TMEW an HD-DVR).

More...

One of the items in the stack was from my local paper, the Laconia Citizen from a couple of weeks ago (Citizen, 7/17/08) concerning the Laconia School District:

Schedule spurs dispute with LEA
Article Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008
As students prepare for this fall's implementation of a new block scheduling program at Laconia High School, the district's teachers union is urging the state Labor Board to squash the plan until school district negotiators are willing to bargain over the changes proposed in it.
"We wrote to them three times in three separate letters from mid-February through the end of March (asking them) to bargain with us ... they refused to do it," said Dick Coggon, a consultant to the Laconia Education Association and the union's co-grievance chair.
So, is this an expression of "it's for the children", or "it's for the union"?  I keep hearing that...

Continue reading "Professional or just a union worker?" »

July 23, 2008

And then you wonder why conservative scream "STOP!"

We have one of these up here, Prof Leo Sandy at Plymouth State who is about on the same par as these folks.  Paid with our tax dollars, his site gleefully flies the UN flag and he absolutely advocates for a one world government.  Talk about biting the hand that feeds you (thank, tenure!).  And no, I'm not linking him.

Anyways, here's more of that same rogue gallery.

Transnational' Profs Forego Patriotism   [Candace de Russy]

Via Roger Kimball:

  • The philosopher Martha Nussbaum warns that “patriotic pride” is “morally dangerous.”
  • University of Pennsylvania president Amy Gutmann, when she was affiliated with Princeton, revealed that she finds it “repugnant” for American students to learn that they are “above all, citizens of the United States” instead of partisans of her preferred abstraction, “democratic humanism.”
  • New York University’s Richard Sennett denounces “the evil of a shared national identity” and concludes that the erosion of national sovereignty is “basically a positive thing.”
  • Cecilia O’Leary of American University identifies American patriotism as a right-wing, militaristic, male, white, Anglo, and repressive force.
  • Peter Spiro of Hofstra University says it “is increasingly difficult to use the word ‘we’ in the context of international affairs.”

I give you agents of destruction of this nation.

Remember parents of college age (or soon to be) kids - I hope you have taught your kids well.  I hope that you have instilled in them a love for this country in spite of it's failings and errors, for even if all the "badness" was added up, all the good that is in this country and the good it has done around the world far outweighs that "bad".

If that were not true, why wouldn't these folks see their hypocrisy and move?  If they truly believed what they spout, why haven't they skaddadled to another fine world hotspot (hmm, many talk about Cuba....)   Yet again we see the case of "fine for me, but keep passing the paycheck!"  Go ahead and rant and rave here - try that somewhere else.

My problem is that the "young skulls full of mush" (as Rush puts it) really don't really know much better as much of their previous education concerning our history and civics gives little to act as a bulwark against this kind of dribble.

(H/T:  Phi Beta Cons)

July 2, 2008

The Lottery - a tax on people who cannot do math (or refuse to learn)

 

This one, I'm blaming on our Educational System....er, no, pandering politicians...er, no, it's a State Agency trying to do it's job - OK, I ran out of targets.

No, this really is politicians trying to "save" stupid people throwing away their money on gambling that is sponsored and sanctified by the State in order to raise money for education. Got that?  Legislators railing against another part of government for being too successful - in doing what the Legislators mandated them to do!  Law of Unintended Consequences!

Or, is the not stupid people but stupid Legislators refusing to acknowledge what they have done?

Naw, they want it both ways - the money ("It's for the children!") and pandering to the adults ("It's for your children that we save you from what we've done!").

From Buffalo, NY:

Critics want lottery to boost payouts for games popular in poor neighborhoods
Say the current system penalizes the poor
Leaders in Buffalo’s minority community, charging unfair practices by the New York Lottery, are calling for change.
Assemblywoman Crystal Peoples has called for a moratorium on new lottery outlets in her East Side district and wants the state to revamp its prize payouts, which critics say penalize poor, minority neighborhoods.
“It’s incumbent that the state correct this. You need to get some equity,” the Buffalo Democrat said.

No, she has it exactly wrong.  It does not penalize the poor.  It does not penalize minorities.  It does not penalize "the inner city".  Neither does it penalize the rich, whites, or the educated. There is only one class of people that it discriminates against:

It does penalize those that didn't pay attention in school and failed math. 

Look, the whole idea of gambling incorporates the "house percentage" - the margin built into the odds of winning and losing.  Pretty much, all legalized gambling has it - how else would casinos get to be so big and flashy?

Face it, when Legislators saw the money being raked in, they decided that government would move in on the racket themselves (calling it "for the children" to make it palatable) instead of raising taxes. In essence, government "moved in" on the Mafia and other criminal enterprises.

A government-operated lottery system that pays the least in prizes for the games most popular in the poorest neighborhoods is “a travesty,” said the Rev. Darius Pridgen.
“Even if it wasn’t intended, they [lottery officials] should aggressively be working with the powers that be — the Legislature and the governor — to even the playing field,” added Brenda McDuffie, president of the Buffalo Urban League.

Utter nonsense!  Lottery commissions everywhere...

Continue reading "The Lottery - a tax on people who cannot do math (or refuse to learn)" »

May 21, 2008

Guest Blog Post: About that math NECAP: "It really was not a hard test, it just tested basic concepts which should be learned at a young age..."

school desk

by Ann Marie Banfield

The state Superintendent of the Georgia schools contacted parents to give them the news that the math scores from the state proficiency exam proved to be dismal.  The Superintendent decided to release the news to help prepare parents for this grim news.

What I find interesting is that Georgia has pretty good math standards.  According to the prestigious Fordham  Foundation, GA received a "B" after the experts analyzed GA math standards.  Compare this to the "F" assigned to the NH math standards.

Now what if the NH students were required to meet higher math standards as GA, or Massachusetts which was given an "A"?  How well would our students perform? 

The GA news is reporting that 40% of the eighth graders would have to be held back based on their failing grades.  Would our students be able to pass the same test?  This is a dilemma for parents in NH.  NH has set the bar so low, that parents cannot rely on state exams to give them a clear idea of whether or not their child is proficient in mathematics. 

With the bar set so low in NH, and with students in NH are having difficulty passing the state exam, just think if that bar was raised to the level of other states who've decided that math proficiency is important.  Why is it, parents must rely upon outside tutoring services, private schools or choose to home-school in order to get a decent education in this state? 

While reading comments at the Union Leader web site where the headline reads: NECAP Math Scores Fall Short, I found the following comment revealing:

"I am a Junior and I took the NECAP this year. I was home schooled until high school, so I come from a different background than other students. I was the only student at my school to get all 4s on the test. It really was not a hard test, it just tested basic concepts which should be learned at a young age, and apparently were not taught in public schools. I think this test shows the holes in early education, because it is not just testing information we should have recently acquired like most high school tests do."

This comment was posted by a home-schooled student who avoided the pitfalls of the NH public school system.

With all the resources and the well educated parents living in this state, it still surprises me that there is no organized effort to raise the bar.

Ann Marie lives in Bedford and is a well-informed parent concerned about the kind of math being taught in many of today's schools-- what she calls "fuzzy math"... She recently appeared on MTNP radio to discuss the subject. Click here to listen.

 

May 20, 2008

Homeschoolers - under attack all over?

We had a small concern going on around here in NH where the Democratic (highly leveraged Teacher Union support) with an encircle and envelope strategy.  Well put by Consent of the Governed:

The Live Free Or Die State wants to regulate homeschooling curriculum. So much for "living free"
This week, on March 13, the New Hampshire State Senate will be voting on a bill that will require homeschoolers to submit curriculum plans at the beginning of each school year for each homeschooled child. It might be interesting to note that this very requirement was removed from their statutes a few years ago. Apparently, they are looking to put it back in place because the educrats have determined that homeschooled kids who enroll in public school are not prepared.
...Isn't the curriculum already offered by the state in public schools one of the reasons many people opt to homeschool in the first place? People choosing to homeschool want to follow their own curriculum for a million different reasons. If the state is dictating what you do at home - you might as well just go to school... right?? Otherwise it's just doing public school at home ... and believe me if you are going to replicate what is done in the public school model at home then it isn't really worth one's time to homeschool at all. Maybe that's what the state is trying to acheive here...
You know, the thought should occur to everyone that we have public schools that are totally managed and controlled by the state government; they set their own standards, they control their own curriculum, they dictate how everything is done - and yet they have mediocre results at best - that's a fact that the news reminds us of almost on a daily basis. And yet, the state and their mediocre schools are the same people that want to oversee and control homeschooling!

And then you have the decision of a California appellate Court that basically made homeschooling illegal

A state appellate court ruling that says parents must have a teaching credential to home school their children has rocked home schoolers throughout the Golden State...

And now, this from Tennesee and our friend Ken over at Blue Collar Muse:

Recently, the Tennessee State Board of Education ruled diplomas issued to home-schooled students from religious based schools were invalid as proof of the successful completion of High School should it be presented for employment purposes for a job for which state law requires a diploma. You read that right. According to the State Board of Education, all diplomas are equal but some diplomas are more equal than others.

According to Tennessee ConserVOLiance blogger Red Hat Rob,

… anyone from a public school (or a private accredited school) who presents a diploma in order to be hired as a daycare worker, police officer, fireman (or any other position which state law requires a high school diploma for) will be automatically accepted. Anyone who presents a homeschool diploma will be automatically rejected.

So, we have a state ratcheting up the edu-bar favoring "the professionals", a state favoring "the professionals, and another state (well gee whilikers!) favoring "the professionals"!

Any one else see a pattern here: parents cannot be trusted?  Yet, read on for the good part.... 

Continue reading "Homeschoolers - under attack all over?" »

May 9, 2008

Amendment to CACR 34: Language only a budding despot could love.

Government Approved Edukashun

Former State Representative Paul Mirski sends the following warning:

RE: Proposed [Public Education] Amendment to CACR 34

There is a reason why there is no language in New Hampshire’s original 1784 constitution concerning the teaching of curriculum in schools.  It is because the writers of the constitution and their constituents were the product of a social and religious exodus from England, that had everything to do with escaping from religious and political indoctrination.

Now, the governor and legislature have cooked up proposed language to amend our state constitution that would void the founders view of freedom of thought, religion and association by having the people of New Hampshire instead, impose upon their children the teaching of whatever curriculum the authority of the state deemed worthy of promulgating. As an added insult, the amendment would give the state the authority to extort from parents and their neighbors, the money to pay for such state indoctrination.

The offending amendment language reads as follows:
“The legislature shall have the responsibility to define the content of an adequate education to prepare the student to become a productive and contributing citizen and to determine the total statewide cost of providing that education to all public school students. The legislature shall have the authority and responsibility to raise the funds that total the statewide cost of this education……”
 

Only a budding despot could love the language the legislature has wrought. No sensible citizen of New Hampshire should let themselves be duped into voting for such misguided social policy nor be duped into giving up rights having to do with conscience, freedom of thought, action and association.

The amendment has been recommended for passage by the House Finance Committee.  The Chair of the House Finance Committee, the Hon. Margery Smith, of Durham, was quoted as saying that the proposed language isn’t something that John Adams would have created.
Now there’s a warning if there ever was one.

Encourage your legislators in the House and Senate to defeat the House Finance Committee’s proposed amendment to CACR 34.

Hon. Paul Mirski
Enfield Center, NH 03749    

 

April 24, 2008

And then they wonder why conservatives distrust the Academy...

Most people believe that the public school system exists to educate their children: reading, writing, 'rithmatic, science, and the like.  They also expect that biases of any type would not enter into that process, right?  If only that part were true. 

As a conservative, I would like to believe the first sentence.  What we have seen, however, is that  there is a real problem in that standardized testing has shown great problems in demonstrating that educational staffs have done their jobs (or are even up to doing so).  Educational staffs decry the use of these tests; yet, they show that the educational system has many holes that have gone unfilled for years and those same educationalists put up all kinds of excuses as to why it is not their fault.

If not their fault, then whose?  And I do not accept the premise that it is the kids (at least, the vast majority of the time).

Especially when I see that biases of that same staff are not tamped down.  In fact, most parents would be irate if they really knew how their kids' teachers were actually trained:

Perhaps the judge should consider that the aim of public education is to interfere with the beliefs of children. Here is the proof:

Chester Pierce, for example, is a professor in the Department of Educational Psychiatry at Harvard University, and a major architect of the development of the "new" American citizen for the global village. Professor Pierce told 2,000 teachers attending the Childhood International Education Seminar in Denver, Colorado in 1973: "Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our Founding Fathers, toward his parents, toward our elected officials, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity.

It's up to you, teachers, to make all of these sick children well by creating the international child of the future." Could his intentions have been more clear?

Time for America to wake up. The judge is protecting the agenda of those who want a "global village". Christianity stands in their way, so they must kick God out of their indoctrination centers, which we call public schools. The tactic is the same that communist China is using to protect their tyranny.

(H/T: Sibby Online; go read the whole thing) 

I wonder if this guy is/was associated with the International Baccalaureate program?

It is NOT the role of government public schools to "teach" our children a way of thinking that is antithetical to their God, their parents, and their country; that is sheer indoctrination!  Yet, I bet if you dig enough, you'd find it in your local school system (one teacher here in Gilford was heard to say something in a similar philosophical manner "WE have your children 6 hours a day and WE know what is best for them".  In other words, as it was taken "we know better than parents what is needed to be taught!"  Needless to say, it was eye opening to say the least).

Heh! Then the NEA and AFT (teachers unions) wonder why their enrollments are going down and those of charter, private, and home schooling are going up.  Andy why taxpayers are starting to "not fork it over" anymore.

Oh, there's more on this after the jump! 

Continue reading "And then they wonder why conservatives distrust the Academy..." »

April 14, 2008

Yup, good edumacations for all!

Ugh....it just keeps getting worse and worse as to what our Public Education system is turning out.  Once again, Joanne Jacobs has the story pointer:

After quoting a much-circulated hoax, the alleged 1895 eighth-grade exam, John Leo quotes a real essay by a Case Western Reserve professor, Ted Gup, on the ignorance of his students:

“Nearly half of a recent class could not name a single country that bordered Israel. In an introductory journalism class, 11 of 18 students could not name what country Kabul was in, although we have been at war there for half a decade. Last fall only one in 21 students could name the U.S. secretary of defense. Given a list of four countries - China, Cuba, India, and Japan - not one of those same 21 students could identify India and Japan as democracies. Their grasp of history was little better. The question of when the Civil War was fought invited an array of responses - half a dozen were off by a decade or more. Some students thought that Islam was the principal religion of South America, that Roe v. Wade was about slavery, that 50 justices sit on the U.S. Supreme Court, that the atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in 1975.”

They can look up the information online — but only if they know what they don’t know.

Via Instapundit.

An intro journalism class - and yet, I keep hearing of Journalism Professors saying that bloggers aren't "good" enough to be listened to...or that being a journalist is above being an American... 

Add the two together and nothing good comes from it. 

 

 

April 8, 2008

What ARE we teaching our kids? What's the message?

The Blue Collar Muse has this story of educators not setting proper examples and then those in charge said "oh, never mind".  Message sent to the kids?  Penalties?  So what?

My take - set a standard.  Set the expectation that the standard is to be met.  And in a case like this, abusing the standard means a consequence that is kept. Message: bad decisions yield bad consequences.  Think first - some consequences will last a long time. 

Or should.  After all "it's for the kids!" 

Education is supposed to be about learning and knowledge. Today’s education seems to be about far more than that, however. From participating in the “Who gets a seat in the Lifeboat?” scenario to curricula dealing with homosexuality, moral issues are taking up more time in schools. Unfortunately, educators often come down on the wrong side of the matter. How refreshing, then, to read about coaches shunned by the schools for their part in what became a criminal case. It would be if that had been what happened!

Lynn Lang and Milton Kirk were football coaches in Memphis, TN. An outstanding player of theirs was being recruited by top flight NCAA programs around the country. In 1999 and 2000 Lang received $150,000 in cash from Logan Young, a University of Alabama booster, to steer him to Alabama. Milton Kirk was to get a cut. When he didn’t he blew the whistle on Lang.

[snip]

But Lynn Lang’s story is the most intriguing. He initially disputed the charges before finally pleading guilty. He, too, was banned from coaching for life and had his teaching license revoked. Despite facing decades in jail, Lang was ultimately sentenced to time served (all of about a day), two years probation, Community Service and a $2,500 fine. He did not have to repay the money he received from Young although the IRS says he owes them $60,000 on the income while Lang swears he has no money left having given much of it to the player’s family.

If the story ended here we’d use it to teach kids right from wrong. But Tennessee’s State Board of Education has a different lesson plan in mind.

Go read the rest

March 22, 2008

We were talking about NCLB on MTNP today....

Gilford Superintendent of Schools Dr. Paul DeMinico and HS Principal Mr. Ken Wiswell joined the MTNP crew today.  While we were supposed to talk about NCLB AND the "International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme", it turned out to be just the former (we've promised to do it again!).

Anyways, the talk centered around accountability, standardized testing (pro and con), and competition in the educational arena and in the "rest" of the world.  Frankly, I did say that the educational established tries to down play the need for competition at the same time that the world is ramping it up more.

Well, here's another case of trying to paper over the bad news - gee, another stab at redefining failure?  From Joanne Jacobs (who is rapidly becoming one of my favorite educational bloggers, emphasis mine):

Kinder, gentler ‘failure’

There will be no “underperforming” schools in Massachusetts, if education officials get their way.

To soothe the bruised egos of educators and children in lackluster schools, Massachusetts officials are now pushing for kinder, gentler euphemisms for failure.

Instead of calling these schools “underperforming,” the Board of Education is considering labeling them as “Commonwealth priority,” to avoid poisoning teacher and student morale.

Schools in the direst straits, now known as “chronically underperforming,” would get the more urgent but still vague label of “priority one.”

They must think their administrators, teachers and students aren’t very bright.

After all, we cannot harm their easily bruised sense of self-esteem, even if their results are of no esteem at all. 

February 29, 2008

Now THIS is an incentive I can agree with!

I have long despared when Liberals and those in the Educational establishment begin to walk down the slippery slope of "pay for grades".  Sure, let's let Government (parents - their call; but Government tax money??) start conditioning it's citizens-in-waiting by bribing them to either to just show up or earn decent grades.

Which they should be doing in the first place!  And if not, let's hold the parents responsible (which, legally, they are) for truant or failure behavior.  And for the former, I am totally against Government covering up for bad parental behavior in getting their kids to school ('"her philosophy is to be "positive" rather than "punitive"')

Thus, I thought this was COOL!  Who WOULDN'T want to take a tank drive with the Governator:

"A" is for Armored 

From the Sacramento Bee: Stay in school, ride in a tank:

(California) Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has a new rewards program for schoolkids: Stay in school, take a tank for a spin.

The Republican governor is bringing home an Austrian army tank he loaned the Motts Military Museum in Columbus, Ohio, and he said Wednesday he plans to use it to drive around inner-city children who do well in school, say “no” to drugs and avoid gangs in the Los Angeles area.

(H/T: Joanne Jacobs over at Joanne Jacobs)

Heh!  She adds: 

Our governor is more fun than your governor.

You bet!  NH Gov. Lynch would be like another MA Gov Dukakis if he tried this stunt. 

Oh yeah, this is Arnie's tank at the Motts Military Museum:

 

Arnold Schwarzenegger tank M47
 

 

February 22, 2008

Coming soon to a school near you-- the UN!?

UN flag.UN classroom.UN flag

Educating for the New World Order?

It all sounded so good when we first heard it... Late in the fall, as a member of my local town's budget committee here in Central NH, we heard the superintendent of schools allude to a new program that he claimed was geared towards academics that would challenge our students in ways designed to help them compete against their peers in other countries. Knowing how we lag in certain areas like math and science when compared to the performance we see in other industrialized nations, who wouldn't be excited when hearing that something called the International Baccalaureate Programme is coming to our schools? Finally-- they're going to do something about ACADEMICS in school for a change!

Not so fast... Some two months after first hearing the lovely proposal for this great new educational method soon to be arriving in our tiny hamlet nestled in the mountains and Lakes Region of New Hampshire, we now have the rest of the story. The first inkling we had that there was something amiss with the program came from a post by former teacher Jane Aitken at NH Insider...

on the school side, there may be propositions to investigate expensive "international education" curriculae in the form of something called "IB".

So far so good, right? Other than the cost, who could be opposed to such a thing in the new global economy? Well that depends. How do you feel about the UN reaching into your child's classroom and "instructing" them? Jane provides some detail that might not be well known in the five (wealthy) school districts (including mine) that are looking into this latest fad:

 

Continue reading "Coming soon to a school near you-- the UN!?" »

December 16, 2007

Principal asks Teachers to "stupid down" the lessons

 

"Dumb down class," asks principal memo 

And they (the Educational - Industrial Complex - "EIC") wonder why many of us support the ideals of NCLB (setting a standard for learning)?  And this shows why many of us believe that the current system cannot reform itself 

The principal of an East Harlem high school last month stunned his staffers by suggesting they dumb down their classes.
"If you are not passing more than 65% of your students in a class, then you are not designing your expectations to meet their abilities," Principal Bennett Lieberman wrote in a Nov. 28 memo to teachers at Central Park East High School. "You are setting your students up for failure, which in turn, limits your success as a professional."
The memo, obtained by the Daily News, urges teachers to review their homework and grading policies, and reminds them that "most of our students ... have difficult home lives, and struggle with life in general. They DO NOT have a similar upbringing nor a similar school experience to our experiences growing up."
One teacher who received the memo said she and her colleagues were "outraged," especially because the school is one of 200 where teachers will receive $3,000 bonuses if their schools improve.

"It's like bribery," she said. "It's not the achievement. It's just the grades."

[snip]

Students shown the memo Wednesday were insulted.
"Why are they going to let some pass who don't deserve it? It's not fair to those who want to work," said Estevan Cruz, 16, an 11th-grader.
Senior Richard Palacios, 17, said 65% of his classmates don't even show up for school. "It's already too much of an easy ride," He said. He estimated that only three or four of the 15 kids in his math class routinely appear.

And then the Dems and the Ed. Unions have their knicker all in a knot over this:

A sharply divided state Board of Education today elected as chairman a Clemson mother who homeschools her four children and supports public funding for private school choice.

Sounds like a Mom who wants the best for kids rather than the EIC. We can't have that now, can we?  Or can we?

One of my favorite statements is "A child deserves a publicly funded education".  I just don't demand where that funding is spent....which drives teachers crazy.  But then again, they're not all that crazy about having to compete either.... 

Continue reading "Principal asks Teachers to "stupid down" the lessons" »

December 6, 2007

Education and knowledge of civics


Wooden School Desk

Didn't get the chance to mention these items that all seemed to speak to a single issue.  The first was a letter by a Laura Grafton from Michigan in USA Today (yesterday).  While it's message was about lowering the drinking age, I caught this:

* Although the United States grants all the other rights and responsibilities of citizenship to 18- to 20-year-olds, it denies them the right to drink. Should the government have a right to pick and choose citizens' rights?

This lady just has not been given an adequate educational background.  By definition, a right cannot be either given or taken away by government.  Our Founding Fathers understood that, and created the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that enumerated basic, fundamental set of rights; emanating from God, they are not to be violated or abridged.

Once again, a citizen gets it wrong, confusing rights with privileges.  Free Speech is a right, Freedom of Assembly is a right; Driving is a privilege and so is drinking.  Last I knew, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is rather silent on the issues of either of the two.

Why do I bring up this nit-picking?  This is yet another case of poor civics training; trying to make a case of which is what amongst the general public does not make for good policy understakings.  Not understanding fundamentals of how our society is structured and ordered is a recipe for disaster.  Yet, early to mid-last century, this would not be much of an issue as Civics was taught. 

And we hear from the Dems that all kinds of things are a right - healthcare being the latest  national one in the news and college for all (if one is to believe Edwards) another.  One would have thought that if it were that important, wouldn't the Founding Fathers have written about both?

And this doesn't help much either in making me feel that our educational system is working all that well either:

U.S. students do worse in science and math

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. students are lagging behind their peers in other countries in science and math, test results out Tuesday show.

It gets worse...

Continue reading "Education and knowledge of civics" »

October 9, 2007

From Jorge: "Training kids to fail in the world that works."

We don't need no edgukashun!
.
Our good friend and mentor, Jorge Mesa-Tejada of Hampstead, is always on the lookout for items that are instructional and illustrative on matters that involved citizens ought to know about. This time, it's one of his favorite topics: education, or the lack thereof...
Doug, 
.
Another great article on how schools are training kids to fail in the world that works. The source is Education News.
.
This is the introduction:
For many urban youth in poverty moving from school to work is about as likely as having a career in the NBA. While urban schools struggle and fail at teaching basic skills they are extremely effective at teaching skills which predispose youth to fail in the world of work. The urban school environment spreads a dangerous contagion in the form of behaviors and beliefs which form an ideology. This ideology "works" for youngsters by getting them through urban middle and secondary schools. But the very ideology that helps youth slip and slide through school becomes the source of their subsequent failure. It is an ideology that is easily learned, readily implemented, rewarded by teachers and principals, and supporting by school policies. It is an ideology which schools promulgate because it is easier to accede to the students' street values than it is to shape them into more gentle human beings. The latter requires a great deal of persistent effort not unlike a dike working against an unyielding sea. It is much easier for urban schools to lower their expectations and simply survive with youth than it is to try to change them.
The “ideology” taught in these urban schools is:
  • Nowness.(What is the unit of school learning time?)
  • Showing Up.(What is the minimum standard of satisfactory work?)
  • Make Me.(Who is accountable for what students learn?)
  • Excuses.(How often can you be late or absent and still be passing?)

Continue reading "From Jorge: "Training kids to fail in the world that works."" »

August 4, 2007

NH trying to take more local control away from communities?

Found this little snippet in the local paper, The Citizen (not online yet):

New Hampshire Education Commissioner Lyonel Tracy said he is considering a proposal for a statewide teacher contract.

"The deputy commissioner, Mary Heath, and I have been talking about what can we do to maximize our professional development opportunities for teachers," Tracy said in an interview Friday with WMOU-AM radio in Berlin.

"Even though we have great professional development activity that is coming out of our state, there still is a discrepancy in salaries across the state, and the schools that offer the largest salaries are the ones that sometimes attract the very best teachers and they stay the longest, " Tracy said.

"We've at least thrown out the idea of what would happen if we considered a statewide teacher contract with some support from the stte for some of these rural communities and would we attract more and better teeachers.  I don't know, that is something to think about."

Tracy said he and Heath are planning to meet with Gov. John Lynch next week about the matter.  They've also met with legislative leaders.

OK, let's see what's what with this"

Once again, the larger governmental body wishes to horn in on the smaller one all in the guise of "we here to help you."  Local School Boards lose control of the majority of what they are supposed to oversee.  Local Budget Committees lose the oversight of one of the largest parts of a town or cities outlays.  Mainly, local voters and taxpayers see their right to control their local towns as they see fit slither away...all under the guise of "we know better, and we have more money".  After all, that IS one of the marks of this snippet....where the larger salaries are located, and where they are not.

This would lead down the road to a state wide Unified School District.  I watch what happens with these....and no, quality of student achievement is not one of them.

And that is the second thing.  Perhaps it is implied here, but is certainly not explicitly stated - what about the kids?  This is presented as all about the teachers, not the quality of the product produced by those teachers.   

Second, notice the emphasis of this snippet - teacher salaries, teacher opportunities.  Who in the teacher's union wouldn't love this?  No more of the union having to deal with multiple bargaining sessions or School Boards (or the "divisive" Budget Committees that oversee the contracts). 

Let's see if the Republican leadership stands up to this power grab by the state.

After all, San Diego City / County has done this.....and look at the trouble they are in! 

 

More later, but time to run to do the Meet The New Press Radio show! 

June 7, 2007

Democrat Priorities Killed School Funding Solution

New Hampshire Republican State Chairman Fergus Cullen explains Gov. John Lynch’s failure to steward a constitutional amendment on education funding through the legislature this way in a press release:

“Governor John Lynch’s weakness as a leader has finally caught up with him.  A leader cannot punt on issue after issue and expect people to follow him when the clock is ticking down.  For two and a half years Gov. Lynch has not led on issues great or small.  He offered no leadership on civil unions.  He offered no leadership on mandatory seatbelts.  It should surprise no one that when Gov. Lynch finally showed up saying, ‘Follow me!’ he was ignored.”

He makes a valid point.

But to my way of thinking, this has more to do with the governor’s priorities—and those of his allies in the state legislature. As I have written before, the Democrats were elected with a mandate in 2006 to clean up the ethical mess the Republicans made in Concord and to hash out a permanent solution to the school funding mess.  What have they given us instead?  Well, they wasted no time in pushing gay civil marriage through, even though none of them campaigned on it and the bill discriminates against heterosexuals. And Democrats in the Senate managed to get a $2 million appropriation for adult diapers taken care of, so that's a relief.

Over in the House, Democrats have placed things like a fine for losing your balloon, seatbelt laws, and a vote condemning the Iraq War ahead of fixing our school funding problems.

In the coming weeks the Senate will pass—and the governor will sign—a measure repealing a law that allows parents to know if their minor daughter is going to have an abortion.

I believe the reason why we have no solutions to our school funding problems is because our leaders in Concord don’t care about our school funding problems.  Instead, they are fixated on imposing a radical agenda, for which there is very little public support and on which they were not elected.

 

BY PAT H 

May 26, 2007

Dumbing down of America - Part 1,435,561

You know, it seems to be that the majority of folks who are upset over the No Child Left Behind law are the professional education folks - you know, administrators, staff, and the Teachers Unions. Vehemently! The decry that they have to teach to “the test” (gee, teachers are giving tests – just not theirs). That the subject material is is defined for them, that they have lost control, unfunded mandates, special groups of kids destroy the averages, the competition is unfair....you get the idea.

IMHO, they have not yet figured out that they should be judged by their product - educated kids.  Or, at least it is supposed to be that way.  And because there has been a failure to do so, some states have put into place standardized testing at certain levels to ensure that kids are learning to a given standard. It seems that some have problems with this – especially the kids who believe it is unfair when they fail. They get upset when they don't get a diploma at the end of senior year.

What the educational system has failed to do is to get a simple idea across – you earn things, you are not entitled to them. I've written about this before (here and here) about standards becoming more and more lax and thus legislators having to step into the mix.

This story? More of the same. Kids not being allowed to graduate because they cannot pass the TAKS (Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills). Note: the kids are complaining!

Crystal Martinez complained that while she finished at the top of her class with a 3.5 grade point average, she is now blocked from graduation by failing the TAKS test.

"We know we're not going to get our diplomas, but we just want to walk across the stage," Martinez said. "That's all we ask for right now."

Classmate Chloe Walker agreed. "I believe that I have at least the right to walk the stage with all my friends," she said. "I made it this far, and I have all my credits I need. I deserve to get my certificate of completion."

At the top of the class and can't pass a test? Now, who is at fault here? That's right, not the kids – the teachers and staff. Call it grade inflation or outright fraud (in my opinion) of services. How can a 3.5 GPA result in failing a standardized test? It shouldn't.  And this notion of rights is just going too far - why didn't the teachers inform the students that standards have to be met (and that there is no "right" to believe that they deserve anything?).

But dig the picture.....look at the closest sign "LET ARE KIDS WALK"...shouldn't one of the responsible teachers clued in the clueless?

Naw, we'll let it speak for itself.  School vouchers anyone?

TEKS 

(H/T: Captain's Quarters) Read the whole article here

May 14, 2007

Can you handle the truth? About that constitutional amendment...

 

 

.
A commenter to a post here on the 'Grok left a link to this YouTube of testimony given in opposition to Governor Lynch's education funding amendment. It was delivered to the Senate committee considering CACR18 by Concord resident Irena Goddard back on April 3rd.
.
Irena is from the former Communist satellite state of Czechoslovakia. Her case against the state funding of education is the most powerful, and yes, intense, agument I have heard against the whole concept of centralized control of student learning to date. Of course, I can hear the naysayers now, "Oh Doug, please. Communism? Here in America? What Irena speaks of is not possible..." I think her case is VERY plausible, and our destiny if we aren't careful. You can read the text here, but I'd recommend watching the video to hear Irena's words for yourself.
.
Asks Irena,

"Have you ever lived in a communist country? Well I have..."

<YouTube here>

 

 

 

May 9, 2007

Death by higher learning?

 

graduation cap

 

.
Other than a post about my agreeing with Ted Nugent that more guns might make people safer in many deadly circumstances, I have made no reference to the Virginia Tech killings. I believe that a low key approach to study and reporting on such an affair is important to avoid the publicity such crazed persons seek. Some future would-be mass murderer should see little but contempt, if anything in the mass media.
.
That's not to say that I haven't pondered the whys and hows of the event. Were there warning signs? Details that have emerged show that there were. What could possibly drive a person to such a cold-blooded lack of concern for his fellow humanity? Slowly but surely, we are learning more of the details. Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum shows that it's quite possible the murderous student could have been influenced by the very institution of learning upon which he brought his evil acts.
What was the motive behind 23-year-old Cho Seung-Hui's killing of 32 students and teachers at Virginia Tech? Why was he consumed with hate, resentment and bitterness?

Cho was an English Department major and senior. As a frequent lecturer on college campuses, I have discovered that the English Departments are often the weirdest and/or the most leftwing.
.
A look at the websites of Virginia Tech's English Department and of its professors reveals their mindset. We don't yet know which courses Cho took, but it could have been any of these.
Click here to continue reading Shlafly's piece. Once you see some of the course offerings under the guise of "English" at Viginia Tech, it does make you wonder...
 
drops of blood
 

 H/T: Jorge

April 19, 2007

Welcome to the NEW New Hampshire. PART ONE

Below is a news article that appeared in the Laconia Daily Sun (NH) this past Saturday. It's a heartwarming story of what some students are learning thanks to their taxpayer-funded "education." It is unavailable online, but is reprinted in its entirety with permission from the publisher. Read the story. I will be followup on this in a separate posting. Feel free to leave a comment...
.

LHS GAY/STRAIGHT ALLIANCE INSPIRED BY RECEPTION AT STATEHOUSE

by Ron Tunning
The Laconia Daily Sun
Saturday, April 14, 2007
.
CONCORD — “It was a blast,” said Jon Arsenault.
.
“It was so awesome,” contributed Steven Gonzalez.
.
“It was so much more interesting and informative than we’d ever expected,” added Jessie Dawson.
.
Those were only some of the remarks overheard from a group of Laconia High School students who spent Tuesday at the N.H. State House as the official guests of Reps. Judie Reever and Beth Arsenault.
.
The contingent, which included 18 students and three adults, were greeted upon their arrival by the two Laconia House members in the Capitol’s “Hall of Flags” before being led on a tour of the historic building by Virginia Drew, the Director of the NH General Court Visitors Center while the two representatives hurried off for a Democratic caucus being held prior to the opening of the day’s legislative session.
.
Following a visit to the Senate Chamber and a walk along the building’s corridors during which Drew offered a running dialogue on the history of the building and its many historic artifacts, the group was escorted to the gallery overlooking Representative Hall just as the legislative session was set to commence.
.
As House protocol demands, the students, members of the LHS Gay/Straight United, were welcomed by House members by a standing round of applause. “We were made to feel so welcome,” said a surprised Dawson, who serves with Gonzalez as co-president of the organization. “We really weren’t certain how we’d be received.”
.

Continue reading "Welcome to the NEW New Hampshire. PART ONE" »

January 24, 2007

Rethinking Teacher Contracts

Friend Jorge Mesa Tejada of Hampstead NH forwards the following correspondence he put together and sent to all members of that town's school board to use as they head into contract negotiations with several unions. The big enchillada, the main teacher's contract, is only a year away. Whether you're in Central NH or somewhere in "flyover country," the information is relevant as the cost of public education in its current configuration continues to spiral upward nationwide.
Dear Board members,
.
Hate to tell you but in just a year, you’ll be negotiating another teacher contract. This year, you’ll be negotiating two contracts: Support Personnel and Custodians.  Those are the bad news. 
.
The good news is that other people are thinking and writing about collective agreements and the impact that current methods used to compensate teachers in collective agreements have on the overall cost of education. One such report was highlighted in this week’s issue of The Education Gadfly, published by the Fordham Foundation.  This is their review:

Frozen Assets: Rethinking Teacher Contracts Could Free Billions for School Reform


 
Education Sector
Marguerite Roza
January 2007 

This paper by the insightful and prolific Marguerite Roza analyzes eight common provisions in teacher contracts, showing how each contributes to overall education spending. For example, experience-based pay accounts for about 10 percent of the more than $500 billion America spends on K-12 education annually. Salary increases linked to educational credentials (e.g., a master's degree) and class size limitations each account for about 2 percent. The other contract provisions account for smaller percentages--sick, personal, and professional-development days; teachers aides; and excess health and retirement benefits (above those provided in other professions) each tally between 0.5 and 1.3 percent of total spending. Of course, even 1 percent of $500 billion is a big number, which brings us to the report's fundamental assertion. We spend billions on teacher perks with little or no evidence that the money is spent wisely, or wouldn't be better used to recruit stronger teachers, reward the best teachers, or target resources to the neediest students. This paper is best read as a national overview; it doesn't dig into specific examples or variations between states or districts. But it poses key issues. Have we made optimal tradeoffs in our public-education budgets or are they simply haphazard accumulations of myriad decisions made in years past? You already know the answer. But the unions don't want to hear it. The Washington Post caught Antonia Cortese of the AFT saying that the report was "on thin ice for its sweeping ... and often inaccurate" assertions. Reg Weaver of the NEA could only repeat his favorite mantra when asked about the report: "fully fund public education." One hopes more substantive discussions are occurring somewhere. One can be confident that Dr. Roza will keep raising such issues and for that we are grateful. The report is online here.

This is the Introduction to the report: 
State and federal accountability systems are putting immense pressure on public schools to improve the performance of low-achieving students. To respond, schools must be able to recruit and retain high-quality teachers, strengthen curricula, and take other steps to provide struggling students with the help they need.
.
But such efforts are expensive and, as the nation faces the cost of caring for an aging population and other challenges in the years ahead, it is unlikely that education will receive a great deal of new funding. Education leaders, as a result, will increasingly have to scrutinize their existing budgets to find ways to fund their reform initiatives. One potentially valuable source of funds for reform are common provisions in teacher contracts that obligate schools to spend large amounts of money on programs that lack a clear link to student achievement.
.
Education is a labor-intensive business—an estimated 60 percent to 80 percent of the more than $500 billion per year spent operating the nation’s public schools goes directly to paying and supporting school employees, and teacher contracts play a big role in determining where such resources are deployed. Much of the money is directed to basic salary costs. But many common provisions of teacher contracts require school districts to spend substantial sums to implement policies which research has shown have a weak or inconsistent relationship with student learning.

Continue reading "Rethinking Teacher Contracts" »

January 23, 2007

Academic Standards - Enforced!

Sun-Sentinel:

New rule for Florida middle schoolers: Pass every essential class or repeat 8th grade

Eager to make sure middle-schoolers are prepared for high school, state officials have made it tougher for students to advance to ninth grade. Starting with this year's sixth-graders, any youngsters who fail even one "core" course must retake the class or they will not be promoted to high school.

Core courses include math, science, English and social studies. Previously, Broward County students could fail one or two of those core subjects each year and still advance to the next grade.

I Like IT!

It is about time that when people set standards, they are enforced.  What sense does it make, like the old saying of "kicking the can down the street", to do the same with kids?  What sense does it make to promote a child to the next grade when it is demonstrable that they cannot do the work?

The fear is that the new state rule could lock eighth-graders in middle school for an extra year, when some would turn 15.
"You could have 14- and 15-year-olds interacting with 11- and 12-year-olds," said Diane Hall, principal at Walter C. Young Middle in Pembroke Pines. "That's not a good situation."

Often times, people of all ages will react to given, demonstrable, and enforced metrics.  If people know that the standards are trumpted but don't really mean much, then why bother with the charade of adhering them?

Students who are held back tend to get more discouraged about academics, Hall added.

Also, if they are so concerned with the kids, why aren't the teachers of these kids, as well as those that had them beforehand, DO something about the impending slate of failure?  Kids don't fail "on a dime" - it takes time.  And adults asleep (parents and teachers) at the switch.

Read the whole thing! 


December 26, 2006

The $2 Bill. Everyone Should Start Carrying Them!

 

Another story about the dumbing down of America.  While it it amusing at one level, I agree with the sentiment expressed in the last line of the story.....

I think we need to quit saving our $2 bills and bring them out in public. The younger generation doesn't know they exist.

On my way home from work, I stopped at Taco Bell for a quick bite to
eat. In my billfold are a $50 bill and a $2 bill.  I figure that with a
$2 bill, I can get something to eat and not have to worry about anyone
getting irritated at me for trying to break a $50 bill.

Me: "Hi, I'd like one seven-layer burrito please, to go "

Server: "They'll be $1.04. Eat in?"

Me: "No, it's to go." At this point, I open my billfold and hand him
the $2 bill. He looks at it kind of funny.

Server: "Uh, hang on a sec, I'll be right back."

He goes to talk to his manager, who is still within my earshot. The
following conversation occurs between the two of them:

Server: "Hey, you ever see a $2 bill?"

Manager: "No. A what?"

Server:  "A $2 bill. This guy just gave it to me."

Manager: "Ask for something else. There's no such thing as a $2 bill."
Trust me, it gets worse....keep reading!

Continue reading "The $2 Bill. Everyone Should Start Carrying Them!" »

December 17, 2006

Never thought of it this way

We hear so much about school vouchers.  Many liberals decry them - when they say "public education", they always mean "taxpayers paying for public schools".  Many conservatives, many (not all) favor vouchers, where parents can use these at any school they believe is best for their child.  My take on it is that public education is that funded by taxpayers.

Of course, the NEA is certainly not in favor of this.  Yet, I never hear them talk about the fact that we DO have vouchers - just not at the K-12 level. From Phi Beta Cons:

A top priority for the new Democratic majority this spring will be expanding the popular Pell Grant program, which is essentially voucher program for higher education:

Under the program, students who meet certain income requirements can receive a scholarship to help pay college tuition. The scholarship is redeemable at one of 5,400 postsecondary institutions. In all, federal taxpayers spend more than $13 billion on Pell grants.

The post contains an interesting observation, especially since the incoming Democratic majority to Congress (House and Senate) are all over the idea that they have to make secondary education more affordable (we will leave aside the consideration of what are the incentives to these colleges and universities to reign in their costs in order to make it more affordable)

If Democrats are really concerned about equal opportunity and educational access, they should end this bizarre bias against choice for those under 18 and support programs that make it easier for all parents to control where their children go to school.

After all, according to John Miller (still at Phi Beta Cons):
 
How crummy is the state of American education? I recently came across this datum, which is not brand-new but is still distressing:

More American teenagers can name three of the Three Stooges than can name the three branches of government (59% to 41%) .

It's appalling, to think that less than six in ten adolescents are familiar with Larry, Curly, and Moe

 

October 19, 2006

Tag, dodge ball and jihad.

This is my weekly column for today's Laconia Daily Sun.

Exercising the First    by Doug Lambert
Tag, dodge ball and jihad.


At what point will we ban childhood itself? While I’m all in favor of modern innovations like good helmets for children (and adults- if they choose) when bike riding and skiing, more and more lately, the notion of “child safety” just gets plain silly.
.
Consider the latest playground rules at an elementary school just down in nearby Massachusetts. The Sun Chronicle (www.thesunchronicle.com) reports in an article by Susan LaHoud that the eternal childhood game of “Tag is now out during recess at Willett Elementary School.” That’s right- students will no longer be able to participate in the improvised game that has more likely than not been played by young humans since the children of Adam and Eve first set foot on the Earth. The story reports that tag will join other fabled games like touch football and dodge-ball on the growing list of games prohibited during recess. Apparently, dodge-ball is too much of an “exclusionary and dangerous game.”
.
The Sun Chronicle notes that such rules are not unique to this one school. There is a “growing movement against traditional games played by young children in school gymnasiums and playgrounds” in states around the country, including Wyoming, Washington, and South Carolina. Before long, these so-called “chasing” games will undoubtedly be known as quaint activities from the “unenlightened” past. Only trained professionals at some historic “living” museum like Strawberry Banke or Sturbridge Village will “play” such games.
.
Why is this? With child obesity becoming a more widespread problem, you would think that anything involving physical activity like running would be more encouraged. Hasn’t Gov. Lynch’s wife practically made an entire career of the issue? How can these games be allowed to be taken from the kids? Is it entirely because they’re “exclusionary and dangerous”? Or is it something else? You won’t be surprised, as I wasn’t, when I read the answer in the October 16th article: lawyers.
.
Of course this involves lawyers- or, more specifically, lawsuits. The reasons described are attributed mostly as “reflecting society's increasingly cautious and litigious nature.” Naturally. “[K]ids would get too rough or run into each other, giving rise to parent complaints and threats of lawsuits.” Once again, the vaunted “threat of lawsuit” stops tradition dead in its tracks.
.
*  *  *
.
While we insulate a whole generation of American children from simple fun games that simultaneously teach important life skills like competition, self-sufficiency and independent thinking, what are our enemies doing? As we admonish our young to quit potentially “dangerous and exclusionary” activities like tag and dodge-ball, what are our adversaries, sworn to kill us all, teaching their children? Do they let them play games involving some sort of “chase?”
.
In the August 23rd 1996 “Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” Osama Bin Laden had much to say about Muslim youth: “I say: Since the sons of the land of the two Holy Places feel and strongly believe that fighting (Jihad) against the Kuffar in every part of the world, is absolutely essential; then they would be even more enthusiastic, more powerful and larger in number upon fighting on their own land… To liberate their sanctities is the greatest of issues concerning all Muslims; It is the duty of every Muslims in this world. I say to you William [Defense Secretary Cohen] that: These youths love death as you loves life. They inherit dignity, pride, courage, generosity, truthfulness and sacrifice from father to father. They are most delivering and steadfast at war. They inherit these values from their ancestors.” Wait a minute- there’s nothing about the dodge-ball being “exclusionary”. What gives?
.

Continue reading "Tag, dodge ball and jihad." »

October 8, 2006

President's Weekly Radio Message

In his weekly radio address, President Bush rightfully remembers the sad events in the Amish community of Lancaster, PA.
.
He then goes on to discuss education in the country, and more specifically, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). I'm not wild about ANY federal involvement in education, and I can't get over the fact that Teddy Kennedy originally supported it, but there must be something to it because most of the flaming liberal educational bureaucrats that I know of, like the superintendent of my town here in central NH (Skip covers our supe's dislike of NCLB here), absolutely hate it. Here's President Bush:

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning.

In recent days, we have seen shocking acts of violence in schools across our Nation. Laura and I are praying for the victims and their families, and we extend our sympathies to them and to the communities that have been devastated by these attacks.

I have asked Secretary of Education Spellings and Attorney General Gonzales to host a conference on school safety this Tuesday. We will bring together teachers, parents, students, administrators, law enforcement officials, and other experts to discuss the best ways to keep violence out of our schools. Our goal is clear: Children and teachers should never fear for their safety when they enter a classroom.

As we work to keep our classrooms safe, we must also ensure that the children studying there get a good education. I believe every child can learn. So when I came to Washington, I worked with Republicans and Democrats to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, and I was proud to sign it into law. The theory behind this law is straightforward: We expect every school in America to teach every student to read, write, add, and subtract.

We are measuring progress, and giving parents the information they need to hold their schools accountable. Local schools remain under local control. The federal government is asking for demonstrated results in exchange for the money we send from Washington. Thanks to this good law, we are leaving behind the days when schools just shuffled children from grade to grade, whether they learned anything or not.

Continue reading "President's Weekly Radio Message" »

October 7, 2006

Mr. Browne, have you no shame? 'Teacher of Year' accepts tainted WalMart cash...

Wait a minute... now I'm really confused- Yesterday's Concord Monitor Online (NH) reported on a science teacher from Concord getting the "Teacher of the Year award from Wal Mart:
Concord High School science teacher Phil Browne seized his five minutes of fame yesterday to talk about the environment. After being named Wal-Mart's New Hampshire Teacher of the Year, Browne told an auditorium full of students, teachers and community leaders about his latest project: Bulbs n'a Bulb n'a Bag.
The Monitor story further reported
The award comes with a $10,000 grant, for which Browne has already dreamed up a use. He said he plans to spend the money on laptop computers and a robotics program called Lego Mindstorms, which lets students build robots out of Legos.
OK so far, right? We all know the local Wal Mart gives away gobs of largesse to any community where one is located. Mr. Browne certainly must be appreciative.
.
Now the confusing part- a visit to the NEA website tells us
NEA has joined "Wake-Up Wal-Mart," a national campaign to educate the public about the effects of Wal-Mart on its employees, their communities and the economy, as well as the anti-public education activities of founder Sam Walton's family.

Participation in the campaign, which is organized by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW), the AFL-CIO union with primary jurisdiction for employees of retail stores, was approved by the NEA Executive Committee in May 2005 and endorsed by the 2005 Representative Assembly in July 2005.

Our society and economy pay for Wal-Mart's low prices. Because of its enormous size (the world's largest and richest corporation and with 1.2 million U.S. employees, the country's largest employer), Wal-Mart's practices have an impact far beyond its own stores and employees.

The company's low wages and benefits drive down wages and benefits throughout the economy, negatively impacting the families of students in NEA members' classrooms. The tax subsidies Wal-Mart receives could be used to help fund schools and other public services.

One would think that Mr. Browne would refuse acceptance of the money from such an evil entity such as WalMart to make a proper statement of protest. What gives here? How could he in good conscience take this dirty money? The Monitor piece closes by telling us

In addition to the $10,000, Wal-Mart gave Browne a framed certificate, a giant banner, a cloth briefcase, an apple made of crystal and a voucher for free photographs in the store's studio.

Gasp! Whaaaaat? He took a v---vvvv---v-v-v-v-voucher!? How could he? After all, the teachers union says that a

voucher system would only encourage economic, racial, ethnic, and religious stratification in our society.

Somebody needs to tell "Brownie" to get with the progaram...

September 30, 2006

Food as Disruptive Technology

Here is my column from the Gilford Steamer concerning the new food policies of the Gilford School District (a link to the Citizen  article, my column is here [the paper is free, online is paid], couldn't find it on the Steamer and the Daily Sun is not online):

 

Analytically Speaking

Disruptive Technology: A new technological innovation, product, or service that eventually overturns the existing dominant technology or product in the market.

The Gilford School Board recently announced updated nutritional and behavior policies seeking to have more healthy students. Dr. DeMinico, Gilford District Superintendent, had a Commentary (Steamer, 9/14) that outlined a number of changes in the nutritional, physical activities, and behavioral policies.

Let me loosely translate – the non-official message is two fold - they think our kids are fat and they now see, as part of their educational mission, that they are to take a leading role in reducing such fat in the aforementioned kids. When I read it, I immediately thought of the character on the Seinfeld show (“no soup for you!”).

How? Some outright NOs: caffeine, sports drinks, only 100% juice, low fat milk, or water, less fatty meats (does that mean that “mystery meat” is a thing of the past?), and smaller portions. More “healthy” foods such as veggies and fruits to be served. Seconds? Get real. Higher prices too.

The Citizen reported that High School Principal Ken Wiswell added the reason for so few food choices is because of the fact the new policies follow federal guidelines. “In the long run, it will be good for us all”. So is cod liver oil, but I don't see any runs on that happening any time soon either.


Continue reading "Food as Disruptive Technology" »

September 3, 2006

Students not ready for prime time...

A college professor friend of mine (not a member of the whackjob nutty professors' club) has long been telling me of the lack of basic core subject skills possessed by incoming first-year college students. He maintains that this is where the lousy education these high school graduates have received manifests itself.
.
My professor friend is not alone in his observations. Friend Tom sent me this in-depth report from the New York Times (yes, THAT NYT!) that takes a detailed look at the problem of poorly prepared inbound college students:
DUNDALK, Md. — At first, Michael Walton, starting at community college here, was sure that there was some mistake. Having done so well in high school in West Virginia that he graduated a year and a half early, how could he need remedial math?
.
Eighteen and temperamental, Mickey, as everyone calls him, hounded the dean, insisting that she take another look at his placement exam. The dean stood firm. Mr. Walton’s anger grew. He took the exam a second time. Same result.
“I flipped out big time,’’ Mr. Walton said.
.
Because he had no trouble balancing his checkbook, he took himself for a math wiz. But he could barely remember the Pythagorean theorem and had trouble applying sine, cosine and tangent to figure out angles on the geometry questions.
.
Mr. Walton is not unusual. As the new school year begins, the nation’s 1,200 community colleges are being deluged with hundreds of thousands of students unprepared for college-level work.
.
Though higher education is now a near-universal aspiration, researchers suggest that close to half the students who enter college need remedial courses.
The shortfalls persist despite high-profile efforts by public universities to crack down on ill-prepared students.
Click here to read the entire article. Ask yourself some questions about the need of remedial help for so many graduating high school students- How can this be possible? Who is responsible? Click here and here for the probable answers to both questions.

August 28, 2006

If standards are not enforced, why bother?

(H/T: Lucianne)

The South Bend Tribune is reporting this story about the first day at school at Morton High School:

HAMMOND (AP) — Fed up with inappropriate outfits, the principal at a high school suspended 128 students on the first day of school as part of a crackdown on dress code violators.
Wednesday’s one-day suspensions came minutes after doors opened at northwestern Indiana’s Morton High School and affected more than 10 percent of the 1,200 students.

The offending attire — including baggy pants, low-cut shirts, tank tops and graphic T-shirts — are banned from classrooms. Students were also cited for cell phone use. 

Hey, didn't anyone get the message?  Or, as it seems to be when some authority figure lays down the law, those affected didn't think anything of it?  However, the story continues in a vein that I was sure was going to follow:

That didn’t stop parents from complaining about the punishments.

Yup, parents.  Let's give them a chance and see if they have any valid claims....

“This takes their first day and makes it traumatic,” said Bridget Lane, whose daughter was suspended for wearing a tank top and layered clothing. “I agree with putting some fear into the kids, but I think this was way too hard-nosed.”

Well, the score for me goes Principal-1, Parent-0!  Boo-hoo, "traumatic" she says.  What was she expecting, a whack on the bottom and tell her to not do it again?  Oops, I raised the specter of spanking in schools (hmmm, it could have a positive impact [pun intended]).  If she wants traumatic, that's what would have happened if one of mine got thrown out for not following a simple rule.

Look, if anything, the parents should be supportive of installing ANY kind of discipline.  And discipline means setting expectations (the school did send out notices in July) and ensuring that the expectations are met (via visual observations in this case), and punishment if the expectations are not met (the suspensions).  Doing anything other than what the school did would show that authority figures are to be mocked and that rules mean nothing.

Here, and over at GilfordGrok (our "local" blog), I take the local Educational-Industrial Complex to task every time I think they deserve it.  This time, the local school deserves kudos for coming up with a common sense policy and then enforcing it.

“I’d be supportive if half the school was sent home, because 99 percent will get the message our schools are for education,” board president Rebecca Ward said. “They don’t need to come in thinking they’re posing for a fashion magazine.”  

Good for the school board!  The students have to learn that actions and decisions have consequences. 

Now, I only have one question - do the teachers and administration have a dress code for professionals that they have to abide by?

 

August 23, 2006

The Kids are Alright...It's the Teachers Who Have Problems

From the August 21st Courier-Journal (Louisville, KY):
A Stuart Middle School teacher has been removed from the classroom after he burned two American flags in class Friday as part of a civics lesson, according to Jefferson County Public Schools officials.
.
Dan Holden, who teaches seventh-grade social studies, burned small flags in two different classes Friday and asked students to write an opinion paper about it, district spokeswoman Lauren Roberts said.
.
A teacher in the school district since 1979, Holden has been temporarily reassigned to non-instructional duties pending a district investigation. The district also alerted city fire officials, who are conducting their own investigation.
I suppose that it didn't even occur to this teacher that he could have burned the Stars & Stripes as a civics lesson in how to properly dispose of damaged flags (the kind of lesson we once learned as Boy Scouts) and still ask his students "to write an opinion paper" about the free speech aspects of flag burning using their imaginations.
.
No, that wouldn't have occurred to this man who's been a teacher in the same district since 1979.  Predictably, the union rallys 'round the teacher: 
Brent McKim, president of the Jefferson County Teachers Association, said Holden has “been teaching for many years, and has by all accounts a good teaching record. It was not a political statement and was meant to illustrate a controversial issue. To fire someone because of that would be inappropriate,” he said. “It wasn’t like he was taking one side or another.”
How about firing him because of poor judgment?  Does the teacher's union not recognize that "poor judgment" is not a desirable trait for a person in a position of authority over young minds?  The fact that students were upset about the flag burning gives me hope for the future. The kids are alright...
.
(FYI, The Who's  movie, "The Kids are Alright" came out in 1979, the year this moronic teacher started earning the taxpayer's money in this KY school district.)

August 17, 2006

Is competition really that bad? Apparently some think so.

We've all heard the stories of children's sports leagues where there are no winners and losers- a perfect, utopian world where everybody is a winner and everyone gets a trophy. There's even places, we're told, where scores are not kept, because determining a "winner" is not as important as everybody having fun. Usually this stuff happens somewhere else- in some distant place referred to in the news or on some talk radio program.
.
Guess what? This kind of "softening" of sports can happen even in places with tough-sounding names like the "Granite" state. The (Laconia, NH) Citizen Online reports in its August 15th issue that the Gilford (NH) School Board is considering a "no-cut" policy for its varsity sports programs:
School board member Margo Weeks suggested that the board look into keeping all those students on who wanted to play varsity sports. This stance would effectively do away with cuts for initial varsity team rosters.
During discusion of the topic, not all school board members agreed, noting that cuts are needed on varsity teams, with the alternative being problematic for coaches and players over who gets to play. The proponent of the "no-cut" policy responded to the criticism of the proposal, noting, according to the Citizen, that
"I think kids figure it out after they sit on the bench for a couple of seasons." She noted that this way kids will effectively cut themselves from the teams, rather than having coaches select them to be removed.

Board members were divided on this issue. Though the general consensus was that in not having cuts it could be detrimental to coaching, as well as team effort overall.

It was also pointed out that this type of self removal could harm a students self esteem, if they were forced to remove themselves.
One of the classic characteristics of liberalism is the inability to make decisions and the avoidance of conflict at all costs. What exactly are we teaching our children about life when we engage in this sort of nonsense?
.
Am I wrong? Feel free to comment below...

August 16, 2006

Is Discipline the key?

Blogging has been sparse as TMEW and I are on vacation in the heart of the Amish country – Lancaster, PA. Why here? Well, TMEW had read a series of books by Beverly Lewis concerning the Amish culture and wanted to see the people and where they lived. So, here we are.

Unlike some who visit to see the shops and shopping, we took an alternative view of our visit – we wanted to know more about the Amish culture itself versus the culture surrounding it. So, we did a tour. And another. And yet another. Without boring you with details, one thing stood out:

How the Amish youth are educated.

Certainly surprised me!

Continue reading "Is Discipline the key?" »

More signs of moral decline...

Ever since the sixties, there can be little doubt that America has been heading further away from the cultural and moral foundations that made us a strong people. Every day we read about the latest tragic and disgusting action perpetrated by one person against another. People in positions of responsibility abusing their power with nary a second thought. What was once that inner voice of restraint and decency has disappeared from the lives of many people. What more evidence do we need than the widespread abuse of children- the weakest and most vulnerable members of society.
.
After the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal broke, I opined that when the authorities were done investigating priests, teachers should be the next object of scrutiny. The shear odds given the amount of contact and influence a teacher by nature must have with students dictates the good possibility of a few "bad apples" within the system.
.
Hitting close to home here in Gilford, NH, we've had the recent guilty plea of a former middle school teacher to sexually assaulting a 14 year old ninth grader. Click here and here for my prior postings about this story.
.
This week, we learned that in Texas, according to a story by KFDM-TV Channel Six News, police detectives
are investigating allegations that there was a secret sex club at Ozen High School that involved students, alumni and possibly even an employee of the school.
.
The accuser is coming forward 5 years after she says the assault took place. She claims she was part of a group known as "3K" made up of 9th and 10th grade girls who would perform sexual favors for upper class boys.
The accused employee of the school is a 42 year old in-school suspension supervisor and has coached sports in the past.
.
In Massachusetts, WBZ News Radio 1030 reported Monday that
A middle school teacher and high school coach pleaded not guilty Monday to charges he repeatedly sexually abused three young boys.
Authorities say he repeatedly raped and assaulted one boy, who is now 21, at his Waltham home over the span of several years in the late 1990s, beginning when the boy was 14. Dacey also is charged with sexually assaulting two other boys, both currently 15, at his home on several dates in 2005. Prosecutors say Dacey met all three boys through his role as their drama teacher or coach.
These stories all represent a sad reflection of where we stand as  a society. Yes, we can increase the punishmments meted out to these people, but what about the underlying cause that allows for this to happen in the first place? The "liberal" society we have become- devoid of God, family, and love of country- doesn't seem as utopian as many hoped...

July 30, 2006

Basic knowledge is a "precious resource" at NPR

These are the folks many rely on for news and views.  I weep for the future generations....

60 years later, NPR's Schorr is still a 'precious resource'
Contact Peter Johnson at pjohnson@usatoday.com

Daniel Schorr is used to producers popping into his Washington, D.C., office at National Public Radio to ask, on deadline: Which war came first, Korea or Vietnam? (Answer: Korea.)

But when one asked, "You covered the Spanish-American War, didn't you?" Schorr couldn't help but respond, matter-of-factly: "That was 1898."

"Oh, sorry, of course," the younger man said, excusing himself.

Link:  http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2006-07-24-media-mix_x.htm

Spanish-American War, Spanish Civil War...very different wars, and only one was in Spain.  At 90, Shorr could have first-hand knowledge of Spain's civil war, but certainly not the war that made Teddy Roosevelt famous.  Still…it could have been a slip of the tongue, meaning one and saying the other…or it could have been total blind ignorance from a media news producer. 
This is government-supported NPR - our tax dollars at work.  

I'm continually surprised at what people don't know and don't bother to research in this age of information.  Too bad we don't have a system of compulsory education in this country...

 

Oh, wait...we do, right?     

July 29, 2006

Teacher Guilty of Student Sex Assault- This One Hits Home

As I perused the Saturday newspapers, the headlines shot from the pages. The Citizen: “Area educator guilty of student sex assault” The Laconia Daily Sun: “Former Gilford Middle School teacher admits to sexually assaulting 14-year-old student in 2000” The Concord Monitor: “Ex-educator pleads guilty in sex assault. Gilford High student was 14 at time” The Union Leader: “Former Gilford teacher gets two years in sex assault of student” Sounds like the stuff of cable news channels- except it’s happening right here.
.
The Daily Sun article, written by Michael Kitch, tells us
Mathew McGonagle, 36, of Contoocook, who recently resigned as assistant principal at Rundlett Middle school in Concord, pled guilty to one count of felonious sexual assault and two counts of misdemeanor sexual assault in Belknap Superior Court yesterday. The charges followed a lengthy investigation by the Belknap County Sheriff’s Office and Belknap County Attorney’s Office undertaken after a young woman reported that McGonagle sexually assaulted her during the 1999-2000 school year when she was a student at Gilford Middle School.
 Remember- we’re talking about a 14 year old! Most of the sexual encounters occurred on school property! As a father of two school age children, I can absolutely feel the rage that must be felt by this poor woman and her family. For a person in authority to violate the trust granted him due to his position as a teacher and, as reported, family friend, is especially egregious. The news reports tell of the confessed child molester’s repeated attempts at pursuing a relationship with the girl after she began to distance herself from her teacher/friend/attacker-even sender her written letters of his desires- which the prosecutors had in their possession.

Continue reading "Teacher Guilty of Student Sex Assault- This One Hits Home" »

July 20, 2006

Here's the difference

Sure, I can pile on! 

From CNN this morning, the Bush Administration announces a new push for school vouchers:

Congressional Republicans on Tuesday proposed a $100 million plan to let poor children leave struggling schools and attend private schools at public expense.

 Face it, there are schools, mostly in poor areas (or simply poorly managed areas) that are trapping kids in poor educational environments.  Throwing money at some problems can fix them but I believe it is has been proven that throwing it at this one generally doesn't work.  And it has been done in limited trials:

Under the new legislation, the vouchers would mainly go to students in poor schools that have failed to meet their progress goals for at least five straight years.

How long do we go before we admit that something has to change?  Five years is a long time in the educational life of a child stuck in a badly performing school. 

Parents could get $4,000 per year to put toward private-school tuition or a public school outside their local district. They could also seek up to $3,000 per year for extra tutoring.

Supporters say poor parents deserve choices, like rich families have. When schools don't work, said Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, "parents must have other opportunities."

During Bush's presidency, Congress approved the first federal voucher program in the District of Columbia, and private-school aid for students displaced by Hurricane Katrina.

 DC has some of the worst schools in the nation, and some of the highest per pupil spending in the nation to boot. What is needed is a new paradigm.  The old one is not working.  Yet, the folks who advocate for more money "for the childre" keep saying this:

"Voucher programs rob public-school students of scarce resources," said Reg Weaver, president of the National Education Association, a teachers union. "No matter what politicians call them, vouchers threaten the basic right of every child to attend a quality public school."

How about we rephrase that and put the emphasis where it is needed:

Vouchers support the basic right of every child to receive a quality and publicly funded education. 

This places the emphasis on the child, not the school - a reformulation that I believe is better.

Reg Weaver of the NEA (See above) is advocating not for the kids, but for the status quo which in this case is the Teachers Union, plain and simple.   Teachers will be needed no matter if it is public or private schools in which they teach, but he knows that the power of the union will be diluted if the paradigm shif is accomplished.

More please, and faster please! 

Yes, it is all about the children

Red State has a little something that shows what the NEA is doing to enhance the education of our children:

Thanks to Jason Riley of the