Voter Fraud? Yep - Granite Grok

Voter Fraud? Yep

voterfraudSince the state and local governments have often refused to look at the problem, individuals upset with this government failure to protect their votes have gotten their own project together to start cross-matching voter information – and it is starting to pay off (and a Hat Tip to the ‘Grok’s own (and Chair of CNHT) Ed Naile for doing a lot of the networking and info gathering here in NH). Emphasis mine, reformatted:

President Trump’s Advisory Commission on Election Integrity has set out to seek justice.

The Government Accountability Institute (GAI) discovered that “thousands of votes in the 2016 election were illegal duplicate votes from people who registered and voted in more than one state.”  GAI used lists of public voter data from only 21 states to match names birthdays and social security numbers to find 8,471 votes from 2016 were duplicated. You can estimate the number of fraudulent votes based on all 50 states and the GAI conservatively estimated that to be around 45,000. 45,000 duplicate votes.

It isn’t just Big Corp using Big Data techniques, folks

“To put this number of fraudulent votes in perspective, Hillary Clinton won New Hampshire by fewer than 3,000 votes out of over 700,000 cast. Just this number of duplicate votes alone has the power to swing state results and, in turn, elections.”

And remember, in this small State of NH, single district races can be decided by a mere handful of votes – and even by ONE vote.  It doesn’t take a whole lot to change a whole lot of races here.  I’ve often said that a Party has to get 51% of the vote to win – we here at GraniteGrok only have to persuade between 0.5-1.0% of the electorate to change an outcome – and we’ve got history to show that we’ve beaten the odds and done exactly just that.

So put that into context and then contemplate what voter fraud can do all by itself.  It doesn’t have to be the “widespread” problem that Democrats use to “pooh-pooh” the idea.  And then add to that the question of why do Democrats so rail and fight against this kind of project?

Myself – it does seem to be a “If A then B” proposition as well as an Occam’s Razor outcome. What say you, Democrats?  If it is such a small problem, why do you put up such a huge stink about these kinds of programs?  If it is what you say, I would think that you’d be urging on the Right to do it more and more often – wouldn’t it means that the real issues of the day wouldn’t get as much attention as they should otherwise?

Or is it true?

(H/T: DC Statesman)

>