Seriously, California? Oh yeah, that difference between Democrats & Socialist thing…

Hammer and sickle

SHOTCalifornia: Hey, maybe communism isn’t so bad after all

EMphasis mine, reformatted: SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Being a communist would no longer be a fireable offense for California government employees under a bill passed Monday by the state Assembly.  Lawmakers narrowly approved the bill to repeal part of a law enacted during the Red Scare of the 1940s and ’50s when fear that communists were trying to infiltrate and overthrow the U.S. government was rampant. The bill now goes to the Senate. It would eliminate part of the law that allows public employees to be fired for being a member of the Communist Party. Employees could still be fired for being members of organizations they know advocate for overthrowing the government by force or violence.

Heck, as we have pointed out before, what’s the difference between the Democrat and Communist USA platforms anyways? Given the results in California, they already have infiltrated with D’s after their names in that single Party rule State.

CHASER: A Hundred Years of Communism.

…Stalin killed so many people in the Great Purge that

it is remarkable that anyone was left to do the killing. Former comrades, artists and intellectuals, military officers, clergymen, dissidents, outcasts and normal Russian men and women were slaughtered in a tidal wave of blood…

…The Soviets inspired others. Mao took power in China and launched a sweeping campaign of modernisation that left millions of expendable victims starved or killed. Juche arose in North Korea, wrapping itself around the country in a chokehold that has persisted to the present day. Pol Pot butchered almost a quarter of Cambodians. Mariam mass-murdered in Ethiopia. Perhaps the most successful of the communist states was Cuba, where, at least, there was not large-scale killing or famine.

Estimated upwards of 140 million citizens were killed by their own Communist governments.

GutterSen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told Al Jazeera that California is the model to “transform” the Democratic Party.

From NTK Network: “If there are people who think running as an independent, running as a third-party candidate makes sense, do it,” Sanders said. “But I think right now where we are, with the great danger of Donald Trump and the billionaire class and the reactionary agenda they’re up against, I am right now trying – again, will I be successful? We will see – to transform the Democratic Party in a very fundamental way.”

Says the guy who honeymooned in Moscow at the height of the Cold War…

Sanders pointed out that in California, “progressives are gradually taking over the Democratic Party.” He says that that is what he is trying to do now, by working with the Democratic Party. Sanders admitted that he might not succeed if the resistance to progressive ideals is too strong within the party, but he feels it’s the best chance right now that he has to save the planet.

Democrats are welcome to push their party further Left, but most of the nation is not like California. Following Sanders’ advice could lead that party to more repetitions of 2010, 2014, and 2016. Let’s hope Democrats are listening to Sanders…

Once, again it is that word “Progressive” – they can NEVER tell the truth of what they are and what they are about, can they?