Judge Must Still Rule on Brief in Case of Carl Robert Gibson - Granite Grok

Judge Must Still Rule on Brief in Case of Carl Robert Gibson

Carl-Gibson-under-Arrest-Again
Image c/o CNHT

CNHT has been tracking and documenting voter fraud since 2000. The Carl Robert Gibson case is a prime example of how voter fraud is accepted and ignored by the parties you would normally expect to prosecute and expose it.

Carl Robert Gibson is one of many outside activists who come to NH every election cycle. At least 1,200 from Massachusetts alone came this past Presidential Primary. You can check the websites of Democrat groups in several New England states and see for yourself how they carpool here and meet up with NH campaigners.

Gibson had a car with two-year-old expired Connecticut plates and a Kentucky driver license that just expired in June of this year when he was arrested in April of 2015 for posting, by using a faked press release, as a Republican candidate in a special election. This action by Gibson was a blatant effort to use a fake press release stating that the targeted candidate was dropping out of the race – days before the vote.

This political “prankster,” as the Concord Monitor refers to him, was registered and voting in other states since registering here in 2012 when he came to work against Cong. Frank Guinta – paid by CREDO PAC a left wing PAC out of California. He registered as a Republican, probably why he was arrested so quickly.

As you can see by the court documents NH took no action to investigate Gibson for using email in an attempt to sabotage an election. His computer was not confiscated, no witnesses were interviewed, no statements taken. The NH AG relied on a Concord Monitor reporter’s story as its sole evidence. The Monitor reporter documents how he caught Gibson and has no sources to hide but was granted a Motion to Quash by Judge McNamara, so he does not have to testify. End of case, EXCEPT!

Judge McNamara has also decided that two statutes also involved with this case are “overly broad” which they are not, thereby leaving the door open for the AG to drop the case.

What these friends of Gibson are doing is a very tight little ballet that has to work perfectly or else Gibson goes before a jury. If a jury gets the evidence, who knows what would happen.

There you have it but for one other fact. I have submitted a 17 page Amicus Brief in this case which the AG has opposed in writing on which the judge has not yet ruled. I document how Gibson has done things like this in other states and his long arrest record and interstate voting record.

Let’s see if Judge McNamara keeps ignoring my brief – which is now public record.

If anyone had any doubts about which side the Concord Monitor is on when it comes to proving voter fraud, there it is.

[su_document url=”http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/gibson1.pdf” width=”540″ height=”660″]pdf[/su_document]

>