RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." - Granite Grok

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

In this day of absolute insanity on college campuses (campi?) from the Left’s censorship via Political Correctness, the Obama Administrations destroying the idea of due process when accused and being judged by a jury of your peers (as opposed to an academic Star Chamber), and the feminists’ perpetual victimhood and that the victim MUST always be judged to be innocent and the accused guilty…

…this is the PERFECT defense (Politically correct liberal progressives of the micro-aggressed persuasions heads will explode – in confusion…

when they can no longer figure out which victim at which level is to be promoted and protected:

You do realize, of course, where we’re going with these three trends?  One day, it’s going to happen that a young woman, whether because she’s delusional, an emotional exhibitionist, or simply vindictive, will file a complaint with her university’s sexual harassment squad claiming that, even though she consented for months to have sex with her boyfriend, she’s concluded in retrospect that her erstwhile boyfriend raped her.  Being familiar with the Stalin-esque administraition her campus, she rightly assumes that, once she’s filed her complaint, her boyfriend will be summoned before a kangaroo court and run out of campus on a rail, with his entire future destroyed.  Ah, sweet revenge!

But wait!  In the Perfect Storm scenario, the ex-boyfriend, when called before the tribunal, refuses to bow down.  He does not beg for a lawyer.  He does not offer pathetic, chauvinistic attacks against his victimized accuser.  He does not beg for mercy.

Instead, the accused ex-boyfriend claims that the charge against him cannot possibly be true.  The reality, he says, is that during the time he was dating his accuser, his gender identity was feminine.  Not only was his gender identity feminine, it was also lesbian — and to the extent his appearance on campus was externally masculine, he behaved that way because he had discovered that he had much greater sexual success as a lesbian (with sexual success defined as encounters with other women) when those same women believed he was a man.  He knew, however, at all relevant times, that he was a lesbian having sex with the woman now hiding behind a screen and accusing him of the heteronormative crime of rape.

Not only does the accused ex-lesbian boyfriend deny the charges against him, he counterattacks.  His accuser, he says, the so-called “victim,” has caused him deep emotional distress.  She is therefore guilty of microaggressions directed at (1) lesbians, (2) women, and (3) gender fluid individuals.  Moreover, the administrative tribunal itself is a triggering factor that has caused him to relive in a post traumatic stress way the horrors of a childhood with religious conservative parents who insisted that men are men, women are women, and that marriage can be only between one man and one woman.

I think this line of turning the table over is PERFECT anti-PC / Feminazi scramble-their-brains brilliance!  Understand their rules, learn their rules, exploit their rules, and finally, turn their own rules against them.

This also invokes RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” as most Leftists, especially those on campi, don’t have much experience in, you know, actual debate in supporting their talking points.

Mostly because they only memorize talking points – and that’s all but useless.

(H/T: Bookworm Room via Instapundit)

 

>