Who In State Government Told New Boston To Stand Down on Vote Fraud? - Granite Grok

Who In State Government Told New Boston To Stand Down on Vote Fraud?

So tell me again - vote stealing activists use NH Democrat Martha Fuller Clarks house to vote fromYesterday I asked, what would you be willing to do to protect your vote when the state refuses to do it for you?

The state is using force to empower non-residents to determine your representatives.  It is exercising a power you never gave it, to stuff your ballot box with the voices of anyone willing to claim domicile for the sole purpose of altering the outcome of your election, without ever having to spy for the consequence of those votes.

It is establishing and defending the foundation vote fraud stands upon.

There is no other definition for what this is based on the decisions they have made.  They will defend the right of anyone who shows up on election day to erase your vote.

Today I am asking, “who in the state government told the New Boston keepers of the checklist that they could not remove 22 year old non-resident names from the voter checklist?”

The 2012 complaint I referred to yesterday includes text from the complainant as follows:

When, four years ago, I contacted Ms.Chapman and questioned this registration of non-residents at domiciles in New Boston where some had departed years ago and one had never resided, Ms. Chapman told me that because the(y) are US citizens they can register to vote, that they have to use a valid house address and they couldn’t use Town Hall.  Therefore, her conclusion was she told me, that since this was their last US address, they might continue to use it, even though they neither resided nor are domiciled here.  Clearly they have no domicile here and have not for 22 years for three of them, and not at all for the fourth.  She indicated that this was what she was instructed to do by the state.

Emphasis mine.

The AG declined to overrule the town so the instruction from the state would appear legitimate.  Someone in the bureaucracy told New Boston that people who had not been residents (or likely even in the country) for over two decades could not be removed from the checklist.

Not only is this an absurd affront to the rights of actual residents it violates election law which–unless I am mistaken–the AG exists to uphold. (emphasis mine)

 CHECKLIST CHANGES: REMOVAL OF NAMES Only those persons legally qualified to vote should have their names maintained on a town or city checklist. Inaccurate checklists which list the name of a person who has moved from town, died, become an incarcerated felon, or who has otherwise become ineligible to vote make it easier to commit voting fraud. While there is evidence of this occurring rarely in New Hampshire  in the recent past (me: bwahahahaha!), historically in the United States one common form of voting fraud is the use of the name of a dead or absent person, whose name is still listed on the checklist, by a person who is not qualified to vote. The public confidence in New Hampshire’s election system may be diminished when a voter reviews the checklist, and finds the names of people who the voter knows are no longer alive or no longer qualified to vote.

 

The rules go on at length about procedure, definitions and so on, none of which can possibly explain why the state would rule against removing these names.  We can only assume that the State and the AG are more interested in diminishing the public confidence in New Hampshire’s election system and allowing non residents to make decisions that only actual residents will ever have to pay for.

The state (Democrats, AG, courts) have no interest in protecting the votes of actual residents.  It is more interested in the defense of non-residents stealing, erasing, and stuffing your ballot boxes, and of–whenever possible-optimizing the opportunity for more vote fraud.

So who in state government is doing that?  You should find them and do what is within your power to remove them.  File complaints. Write LTE’s.  Badger your local keeprs of the checklist to find and remove the names of non-residents according to election law.  If they refuse or say they can’t, get them to explain why, get them to point to statute, get it in writing, and then share that with the public.

Turn out in numbers to vote that will ensure local voices are heard.  Vote for candidates who will enact and enforce laws to protect your voice and who will find and remove bureaucrats who protect nonresident voters before resident voters.

Only you can prevent non-residents from stealing your elections.  Don’t wait for a political machine to help.   The Bureaucrats would rather you left them alone.  Most candidates wont stick their necks out unless they know it is a popular position.  The people make it popular.  You can apply pressure to bureaucrats.  Be polite but make a many people uncomfortable as you have to to get answers.   You can apply pressure to elected officials –politeness at your discretion.  But until you do it, they wont do a damn thing.

I will ask again.  What are you prepared to do about it?

 

 

>