Court ruling: blogs are media - Granite Grok

Court ruling: blogs are media

It has taken a few years but blogs (like GraniteGrok) have slowly crept into the mainstream.  While many of the bloggers have crept into the MSM and most of the MSM outlets have incorporated blogs into their offerings, there has always been a pecking order.   Many have derided bloggers as “not journalists” and certainly early on, “journalists” sniffed at and looked down upon these “mere bloggers”.  No longer (although most bloggers still dwell near the bottom of the media totem pole – or political one for that matter).  However, with the disintermediation of the Internet, journalism seems to be returning to the realm of “what you do” rather than “it is how I get paid”.  Journalism is now longer just a profession but an activity to which millions of “amateurs” now practice and some of them that go payless are far better journalists than those that do.

However, the legal status in terms of liability has been sketchy at times as the law and law practice has been outpaced by the technology and the embracing the public has given to this “disruptive technology”.  But thanks to a case in Florida, we bloggers (at least in FL) have legal status (emphasis mine):

…it is hard to dispute that the advent of the internet as a medium and the emergence of the blog as a means of free dissemination of news and public comment have been transformative. By some accounts, there are in the range of 300 million blogs worldwide. The variety and quality of these are such that the word “blog” itself is an evolving term and concept. The impact of blogs has been so great that even terms traditionally well defined and understood in journalism are changing as journalists increasingly employ the tools and techniques of bloggers – and vice versa. In employing the word “blog,” we consider a site operated by a single individual or a small group that has primarily an informational purpose, most commonly in an area of special interest, knowledge or expertise of the blogger, and which usually provides for public impact or feedback. In that sense, it appears clear that many blogs and bloggers will fall within the broad reach of “media,” and, if accused of defamatory statements, will qualify as a “media defendant” for purposes of Florida’s defamation law as discussed above.

There are many outstanding blogs on particular topics, managed by persons of exceptional expertise, to whom we look for the most immediate information on recent developments and on whom we rely for informed explanations of the meaning of these developments. Other blogs run the gamut of quality of expertise, explanation and even- handed treatment of their subjects. We are not prepared to say that all blogs and all bloggers would qualify for the protection of section 770.01, Florida Statutes, but we conclude that VanVoorhis’s blog, at issue here, is within the ambit of the statute’s protection as an alternative medium of news and public comment.

We are among “the payless” but I would hope that we do more and are better than “the average” blogger(s).  Our bias is clear: conservatarian from an Constitutional / Judeo-Christian outlook.  It is who we are and what we advocate for.  Why? Because those values made this country the best the world has ever known (warts included).  Along the way, we opine and do original journalism as well (the old ‘who, what, when, where, and why’ bit), citizen journalism as well.

And we are grateful to you all that come through our door and spend your valuable time reading what we think is important, things we thing you might wish to know, and share stuff with you that we just is amusing.

>