If You Think Obama Is a Good President... You're a Racist - Granite Grok

If You Think Obama Is a Good President… You’re a Racist

Dictionary.com Racism:

1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

I got bad news.  I agree with many on the left.  Our country is infested with vile racists.  They’re everywhere: in our media, in our government, in our schools, in our stores and they remain contaminating a major political party as they have historically done for well over a century.

A cynical person might put two and two together and conclude something sinister and nefarious is afoot.  That intentional harm is consistently applied to a certain group of people by the hands of another certain group of people. Think about it. The same party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow and who fought against the Civil Rights movement (e.g., people had to march in Alabama for civil rights to be recognized because of the Democrats controlling the state: George Wallace, Governor, Democrat) is now insouciant about the demise of the black family and the black squalor of the inner cities.  Coincidence? Maybe.

But there’s more…

If  you think Obama’s a good president… you’re a racist.  Or admittedly, a naive communist, but let’s stick the racist vantage for this.

Seriously.  By what historical objective standard or metric can someone use to show any successful achievement by the bungler in the White House? Any advancement this country has made?  Any?  Please, do share. Go ahead.  It’s not in managing economic matters for sure, the debt is the largest ever, the deficit is still gargantuan—sure it fell from where he rose it initially, but he still rose it to include the trillion levels way above his predecessors— unemployment is bad, labor participation is lowest in over 30 years, standard of living is down.

Nope none of those are deemed successes by historical standards.  What about foreign relations, Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo, Russian reset? Nope.

How about internally: unity, morale, vision of the future?  Well we had IRS going after political opponents, AP scandal, James Rosen, NSA obliterating the 4th Amendment, Fast and Furious, assassinated ambassador in Benghazi occurring on the completely unpredictable and unremarkable, meaningless date of September 11th, yeah that’s makes you feel great to be an American, right? We know the answer to that isn’t in the affirmative. And the list of failures goes on and on. But please, if you can find a success, share it.  Problem is…

You can’t.

He’s a failure.

So if you claim that Obama is a success, you must be doing it for some reason.  My assertion is that the most likely reason you think he’s a good president is that you think he’s a good president… for a black guy.  Which is racist.  If you think he’s a successful president, you’re a racist.  You’re treating him differently because he’s black, because of his skin color, that is racist. You are a racist.

You have “a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.”

So you’re lowering the presidential standard for this current president.  Lowering a standard that measured the success of all prior presidents who happen to be of a different race than the current one.  That’s racist.  You are racist.

He has not been a successful president as measured by historical standards period (Note: that “period” means no qualifications follow… I’m using it as its properly used, not as a ruse. i.e., not like this “president” uses it).

So, if you’re like me and think this guy is a walking wrecking ball, and when you say so, someone calls you a racist, please understand, they are projecting.  They are projecting their racism onto you. They’re thinking how could you be so mean to just a nice little black guy.  That is racist.  The bad news is they don’t know that. They don’t see it.

They’re the same ones in charge of cities that hold a black population to a different standard and flush their children’s future down the drain with sh***y schools and vulgarly violent streets.  They tolerate it because they treat those people differently than they treat their own.  They’re racist.  If you wouldn’t tolerate sending your kid to a squalid cesspool, but its good for “those” people, you’re a racist.

When people try to change that and send their kids to private schools or some other schools, the racists fight them to help out their union buddies.

When people murder each other at a frighteningly alarming rate and you simply shrug your shoulders with an eye roll and mumble “that’s a shame” and do nothing about it when you can do something but instead simply look the other way and let it be. You’re a racist.  That’s tacit racism.

Another definition, same source as above, Racist:

1. the belief that races have distinctive cultural characteristics determined by hereditary factors and that this endows some races with an intrinsic superiority over others
2. abusive or aggressive behaviour towards members of another race on the basis of such a belief

I think blithe insouciance towards the ravages of the inner city qualifies as “abusive… behaviour” and is in line with “the belief that races have distinctive cultural characteristics determined by hereditary factors and that this endows some races with an intrinsic superiority over others”.   The people in charge of these areas view people in those areas as inferior.  That the violence and squalor is simply the “cultural characteristics” of the people in those areas and nothing can be done about it.   That’s racist.

You see where I’m going here?  The evidence of institutional political racism in the Democrat party is thick and continues today: Detroit, Chicago, Gary Indiana, Camden New Jersey, the list goes on and on.  Violent cesspools tolerated, heck ignored, all in areas controlled by Democrats.  The reason?  They’re racist.  They treat the people in those areas differently than they treat other people in other places.  Why?  They’re expendable because they got their vote. What vote? The black vote. So they treat blacks differently than others? Yes. Treating someone differently than other based on race is…wait for it… racist.

And if you think Obama is a good president, you’re a racist too.

>