That's right, racism around every corner - Granite Grok

That’s right, racism around every corner

Voter ID required except when its not
Voter ID required except when its not

This from the guy that could have had HIS ballot stolen by another:

Speaking exclusively to MSNBC host Ari Melber, Attorney General Eric Holder sharply criticized state-level voter identification policies and said that he believes those policies are a “remedy in search of a problem.” He added that, while some may be arguing for voter ID in good faith, he believes that most are advocating for this policy in order to “depress the vote” of those who do not support the “party that is advancing” voter ID measures.

“I think many are using it for partisan advantage,” Holder said of voter ID.

Or the flip side – can’t vote early and often if you have to show an ID, right?  We in the Northern part of NH just had the chance to vote this past in a special election.  You want to know something, US Attorney General Eric Holder? I LOVED the idea that I had to show my Government issued ID before my name was check on the Voter Registration list – even though the person on the other side of the table knew who I was.  It meant that no one, absolutely NO ONE, could vote for me – and steal my vote. 

Partisan Advantage?  You bet, for I am on the side that MY vote is MY vote and no one else’s.  I’m on the partisan side that YOU own YOUR vote and nobody else.

“People have to understand that we are not opposed to photo identification in a vacuum,” he continued. “But when it is used in — certain ways to disenfranchise particular groups of people, whether by racial designation, ethnic origin, or for partisan reasons, that from my perspective is problematic.”

He added that “all the studies” show that in-person voter fraud “simply does not exist” at a level that requires a legislative solution.

Yeah, well Project Veritas showed how easy it would be to have it happen – and no one would be the wiser.  ACORN, Mr. Holder – you who rejected pursuing the Black Panther voter intimidation guilty verdict (after all, you have institutionalized the politicization of your Dept. Of Justice that only whites can discriminate against others).

“I think it is being used in too many instances to depress the vote of particular groups of people who are not supported of the party that is advancing these photo ID measures,” Holder concluded.

Sorry, not buying it – we hear all the times that the Administrative State that Progressives wish to institute in place of our Constitutional Republic will be staffed strictly by non-partisan technocrats who “serve” only to make the best decisions for the rest of us by which to live our lives.  Sorry, but if Holder is the best example, I’ll do all I can, as Ben Franklin said, to “keep it”.

>