Rhode Island Liberty-xenophobe (and New Hampshire House Democrat) Cynthia Chase has submitted a Legislative Service Request (LSR) “relative to accountability requirements for HOME EDUCATION programs.”
2014 – LSR 2591-R .
I can see where she’d be concerned. Home Schooled kids are not typically the kind of progressive drones a liberty-fearing Trotsky-ite like Chase has much tolerance for. They ask questions and challenge assumptions made by the lefty-media and government institutions, including ones Chase would use “…to make the environment here so unwelcoming that some (Free Staters) will choose not to come, and some may actually leave.”
If you force all the kids into sub-standard government schools run by democrat donors manipulated by union thugs because you have intentionally denied them a choice by poisoning the water for Home Schooling, they all grow up to be just the right kind of stupid for the Democrat party to control them.
We already knew Chase was a supporter of the progressive political plantation, so I guess this is just a natural extension of the socialist model. Children are educational chattel, owned by the state and the union school monopoly, who will be trained to love government and obey.
“Once you set foot on the New Hampshire Plantation Massa Chase be setting your mind right…er, I mean left.”
Put another way, parents, Chase–merely a vessel of the divine progressive word, does not trust you with the state’s children.
I confess, I have no idea what Chase has in mind but I know who she is politically so I know exactly what she has in mind. Control, red-tape-intimidation, use the state to make home schooling such an intractable proposition that almost no one dare challenge the government education monopoly.
Having said all that, I have two more observations to make (with some slight relevance to the LSR) about the woman who would use the power of the police state to regulate emigration into New Hampshire by limiting it to people she agrees with politically.
First, has anyone submitted an LSR “relative to NH House Democrats playing solitaire during Floor Debates?”
Second, will enough of those “Free Staters” Chase abhors have established a “presence” in her NH House district by November 2014, having demonstrated intent to “live” here–as provided for by the NH AG’s office and any number of elected Democrats who have, themselves, opened their doors in the past to electoral transients and been found innocent of complicity to commit vote fraud?
We know that thousands of Free Staters have already sworn their “intent” to move here. Maybe it is time they drop by for a “swim.” Test the electoral waters, so to speak. Make their “presence” known in any number of important house, senate, and Executive council races come 2014.
Help Cindy Chase out of office, if you get my drift.