"Anti-Gun Violence" Means That Democrats Are Anti-Gun, and Want More Violence - Granite Grok

“Anti-Gun Violence” Means That Democrats Are Anti-Gun, and Want More Violence

Liberal Gun control like drunk dirivngWhen the anti-gun violence polices you demand we implement consistently demonstrate that more people will be killed and more people will be killed by guns, and you leave that out of your “conversation about ant-gun violence,”  people should be suspicious of your actual intentions.

And so you should be suspicious of OFA and Minnesota based Granite State Progress, which have been spear-heading the Democrat parties progressive anti-gun violence campaign in New Hampshire.

OFA held a real rip roaring anti-gun violence Rally in Nashua a few weeks back.   Almost no one showed up.  Sure, they did better than the ProgressNow’s pro-NH-Medicaid Expansion Rally in Concord where no one showed up and they had to hide that epic failure by claiming it was moved inside the chamber.  Yeah.  You know what was inside the chamber?  The hearing.    You don’t need to pull a permit or have your attendance at the hearing recorded on the calendar as a rally, which is what Minnesota based Granite State Progress had done.

And now the same Minnesota based Granite State progress seems to think it’s time to talk about gun violence again.   I agree.  Let’s talk about gun violence.

New Hampshire’s 10 year average for murders per year, (that’s…per/YEAR) for data that was available, is 14.8  The highest single year in those last ten was 19.  That’s 19 murders in an entire year.   And recent years have been lower on average than those in the 20th century.

Keep in mind, these were not all committed by guns.  These are just murders.

Chicago, which  has some of the strictest anti-gun violence laws in the nation had 57 homicides….just in August, as of the 28th.  They had more murders per week than New Hampshire averages in a year.  It would take New Hampshire, with its reckless wild west gun laws, almost four full years to have as many homicides as Chicago had in one month, of what has been regarded by experts as a slow year for homicide in Chicago.  Last year they had over 500.

That’s some real good anti-gun violence legislation you got there.

Since 1990, the year I moved here, New Hampshire has had 398 homicides.  That’s 23 years.  That’s ten months in Chicago.  And remember, in New Hampshire at least, less than half of those on average are even going to be gun related.

Want to chew on some more progressive ass-hattery?  Why not.

You know who has a lower gun homicide rate than New Hampshire?  Vermont.  You don’t even need a permit to carry concealed in Vermont.

What else?

The states with the best Brady Scores for anti-gun violence policies,  these states have the most restrictions on legal firearm ownership and as such typically have much lower rates of legal gun ownership–have the higher rates of homicide and gun related deaths.

Go figure.

Are we having a discussion on anti-gun violence yet because I know I’ve discovered a pattern.  More legal gun owners, less restrictive gun laws, fewer murders and fewer gun related murders.

Conclusion: What the phrase “Anti-gun violence” really means is that the proponents are anti-gun, and that their policies will result in more violence.

 

>