Is it Time To Pull Out…of Chicagostan?

by Steve MacDonald

Chicago - more murders than deaths in warWND is reporting that since the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan (2001 to present) 2,166 Americans have died there.  From 2003 to present, 4,797 people have been murdered in the city of Chicago.

Chicagostan is more dangerous to the life expectancy of American’s than Afghanistan.  And in case you forgot, Afghanistan is a war zone.

And remember Iraq?

Operation Iraqi Freedom, the name for the war in Iraq, which started March 20, 2003, and ended Dec. 15, 2011, saw a total of 4,422 killed.

We had to ‘pull out’ of Iraq.  No more American blood would be spilled there.  So is it time to pull out of Chicagostan?

But why should we?

Chicago has the toughest anti-gun laws in the nation.  If Liberal policy wonks can be believed it should be the safest city in the land.   Yet more Americans are killed there than in a war zone, including this young lady from Chicago, who performed with her School band at Mr. Obama’s recent inauguration.

So American children are dying every day in Chicagostan and it’s not for oil, or money.   It is not to advance the global world-view of some colonialist super-power, for good or bad.   These Americans are dying for the Democrat parties arrogant obsession with failed public policy.  Those 4,797 people died because a long parade of liberal-Democrats refused them the right to self defense.  They never had a chance.

And if liberals had their way, the whole nation would be just like Chicago?

If the whole nation was like Chicago there would be no better place for people in Chicago to go.  We couldn’t pull out of Chicagostan.  We’d all be trapped in the lefts failed social experiments, the ones that lead to the violence, that lead to the deaths to more people in a domestic metropolitan city than in a war zone.

Is that what the Liberals really want?  They want us to depend on them, to depend on government to such a degree that they are willing to sacrifice the lives of our families, our children, thousands and thousands of dead Americans, just to get their way?

The answer is yes.  Whether they choose to believe it or not, that is exactly what they want.  That is the result of their anti-gun policy.  And they refuse to back away from their policy.  So that blood is on their hands.

Leave a Comment

  • Chris P. Bacon

    Hmm…how many non Americans have died in those operations? Seems like a stretch, especially for someone as smart as you.

    • Tim from Nashua

      The LameStream Media only counts American bodybags, so it doesn’t matter how many non-Americans died. The point is, that it is safer to be in an actual warzone, than the ‘warzone’ of Chicago. That, and disarming law-abiding citizens doesn’t make a place safer, because the criminals don’t follow the law, by definition.

      • IWKAGGP

        To the contrary . . . I’d say that much of the time our Govt. counts foreign casualties above our own. Why else would the politicians constantly tie the hands of our me and women in uniform and not allow them to fight the kind of war that would actually produce, quick, decisive victory?

        • C. dog e. doG

          Who are you, and what did you do to flute boy?

      • http://www.GraniteGrok.com/ Rick Olson

        and here is the other side of the coin…at least when people die in Chicagostan, the coroner comes and picks them up instead of having the corpses rot in the 110 degree sun for a couple of hours…and that smell never leaves the mind.

      • Chris P. Bacon

        Hmmm..i love guns. There neeto. I live in AZ so i can shoot mine almost anywhere (go to youtube and search “Big Sandy Shoot’), but to make the statement that you are safer in Iraq or Afganistan then Chicago only fuels the fire of those who say gun lovers are nuts. I can almost say without doubt that the 150K to half million (depending on the source) civilians who have died in those two countries since 2001 would much rather be in Chicago. I am on your side Tim, but making sweeping generalites mixed with hyoperbole wrapped in subtrefuge doesn’t help the cause. The facts speak for themselves to those that are capable of obsorbing those kinds of facts. No need to make them harder to believe.

        • C. dog e. doG

          You, sir, are on a roll, and bye so doing, are making me role on the floor guffawing like Gomer Pyle. Bye the way, I had to watch Big Sandy shoot waring my bigboy sweatpants.
          – C. dog dancing down the sidelines

          • DanDruff6666

            Well, lucky you. You did notice i said “slightly tighter pants”. Damn, i can’t get rid of the Dan Druff thing!!

Previous post:

Next post: