Imagine a judicial nominee said ‘my experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman.’ Wouldn’t they have to withdraw? New racism is no better than old racism. —Newt Gingrich
The vote is in. Obama is still President. The Republican establishment got exactly what they wanted: Romney as a candidate; a losing candidate. And despite their tireless inane mantra during the primaries exclaiming, “Romney is the only guy who can beat Obama” So what be the post-game analysis now? Romney lost. Romney was never a conservative. He said he was a conservative but we all knew differently…and like so many others we voted for him because voting for Obama was not an alternative for us.
But the real story here is what the biased, liberal in-the-bag lamestream media has to say about it the morning after: America, because it is less white, voted for Obama.
NBC News stated two days ago…
All about turnout — and racial composition:Obama 48%, Romney 47% among likely voters. If anything is likely to decide this very close presidential contest, it probably comes down to turnout (duh!), as well as the racial composition of the electorate. Since the campaign began, Team Obama has assumed that whites would make up 72% of voters, down from 74% in 2008. (The logic: This percentage has decreased in every U.S. election, and the minority population continues to grow.)
ABC News declares,
“A coalition of women and nonwhites helped re-elect President Obama to a second term tonight.”
CBS News’ narrative claims,
Whereas Mr. Obama enjoyed overwhelming support among black and Latino women, white women supported Romney, 56-42 percent. In addition to non-married women, other key components of Mr. Obama’s constituency were young people, racial and ethnic minorities.
Politico’s Jonathan Martin this morning declares, “Election aftermath: GOP soul-searching: ‘Too old, too white, too male’? Republicans face a crisis: The country is growing less white, and their coalition has become more white in recent years.
In May of 2012, the Brookings Institute opined, “Why Minorities Will Decide the 2012 U.S. Election,” stating that,
“Obama and the Democrats believe demography is on their side. Census 2010 made abundantly clear that racial and ethnic minorities, especially Hispanics, are dominating national growth and will for decades to come. The Democratic agenda— favoring broader federal support for medical care, housing, and education seems designed to curry the favor of these groups, which played a huge role in tipping the balance in his favor in several key swing states.”
As I web search the various sources and stories, the internet is awash with spin along racial and ethnic lines, calling white voters, “the new minority.” Is This is the new American apartheid? Are we now engaged in a new policy of segregation drawn along political and economic lines, where people of European descent are now marginalized? I will probably get called a Racist for merely asking the question. But that is to be expected because this is the era where the definition of racism is whatever the left says it is.
Sour grapes that things didn’t turn out as I wished? Certainly. I concede that. But, like so many others like me, there has never been a time in my nearly 50 years on earth that I’ve ever had a substantial personal stake in any election, either. I never thought the day would ever come where I’d bear witness to such stark polarization along racial lines as we are seeing today.
Supposedly, the current era advocates, preaches, extols and waxes pop-culturally, this notion of, “tolerance.” except, that is if you’re a white guy. So, as the dust settles from the worst President in U.S. History being re-elected following a campaign of class warfare, race-baiting and other cornucopia of lies and deceit, the “free stuff” generation has spoken.
In the Atlantic in 2009 Hua Hsa inquires,
“The Election of Barack Obama is just the most startling manifestation of a larger trend: the gradual erosion of “whiteness” as the touchstone of what it means to be American. If the end of white America is a cultural and demographic inevitability, what will the new mainstream look like—and how will white Americans fit into it? What will it mean to be white when whiteness is no longer the norm? And will a post-white America be less racially divided—or more so?”
It would appear the, “more so” theory prevails today under this pretext of tolerance.