Well, NH has a law for the First-In-The-Nation Primary so why SHOULDN'T South Carolina make it law for the First-In-The-South-Primary? - Granite Grok

Well, NH has a law for the First-In-The-Nation Primary so why SHOULDN’T South Carolina make it law for the First-In-The-South-Primary?

And the jumping escapades just got a tad more pro-active.  Everyone knows (even if they won’t admit it) that NH Republicans have no choice as to when the NH Primary is held – by LAW, it must be the first in the nation.  Methinks that South Carolinians have done this just to slam down the gauntlet to those usurpers from Florida; from

The Office of the Speaker
SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 27, 2012
Contact: Greg Foster
(803) 734-3125
gregfoster@schouse.gov

Ensuring SC’s First-in-the-South Presidential Primary
House Bill will preserve Palmetto State’s national influence

(Columbia, SC)  –  Today, the S.C. House of Representatives introduced a measure (H. 5081) aimed at securing our state’s First-in-the-South Presidential Primary.  A majorly influential position for both political parties, this early primary brings more than just status recognition – it translates into high-profile national exposure and millions of dollars in economic impact.

House Speaker Bobby Harrell said:

“As South Carolinians, we take our duty of selecting the next President of the United States very seriously.  Since the election of President Ronald Reagan, South Carolina’s First-in-the-South Primary has swayed huge national influence.  With more and more state’s trying to jump ahead of South Carolina each election, we need to take steps to protect our state’s historic primary position.”

“Modeled after New Hampshire’s Presidential Primary state law, the House has introduced a bill that will cement South Carolina’s spot as the First-in-the-South Primary state,” Speaker Harrell added.  “Along with the national exposure and one-on-one interaction our citizens have with the future President, this early primary translates into millions of dollars in added economic benefit for our state.”

With an incumbent President seeking reelection, our state hosted a single-party primary this year.  Even though only one political party conducted a Presidential Primary this cycle, the impact on our state was immense.

Facts & figures from SC’s 2012 First-in-the-South Presidential Primary:

 –  A record 600,000 South Carolinians voted in the January 21st Election
–  5 Presidential debates (Greenville, Columbia, Spartanburg, Myrtle Beach & Charleston)
–  Over 1,000 on-site media members from 30 states & 12 countries covered SC’s Primary
–  Hundreds of campaign events across SC, each generating much-needed economic activity
–  $13.2 million in television ads purchased in SC, drawing mostly out-of-state dollars
–  $14 million economic impact for the Myrtle Beach debate alone
–  Nearly $½ million increase in Charleston tourism revenues over the Election weekend

I wonder how the Republican National Committee (and the DNC, for that matter) is feeling about this – they’re losing even more control over their primary.  There are already rumblings about rethinking the next cycle’s debate series (gosh, I DO hope so – I’m sorta ok with the number but PLEASE get Conservatives as the Hosts / Questioners).   I know that NH has lost voting delegates to the Convention because of our law (scheduled before the RNC’s blessing) but it might turn out the same for SC.  The question is, will everyone else want the financial impact that SC gets?  Isn’t that the real reason for the never ceasing line jumping?

 

>