blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
RBOBlog
RedHampshire
Rob Boyce Blog
TBONH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« May 2009 | Main | July 2009 »

June 30, 2009

"Delay as you go..."

RI.P.?

 

Alarming US Budget Deficit Causes Russia to Shift Assets from US Dollars 
Global trend could quickly reduce US standard of living

Guest post by Penny Wise
 
For decades, Russia’s reserve currency has been the US dollar, but the dollar has recently fallen out of favor. The Russian government is now aggressively moving assets into other currencies, and the US dollar is no longer Russia’s majority reserve currency. This action is part of a profound global trend that will quickly, and perhaps permanently, reduce the standard of living of all US citizens. The cause of this is simple: accelerating federal budget deficit spending by the United States.
 
The total federal budget deficit for the first eight months of the federal fiscal year that ends in September was $991.9 billion, with a deficit for May alone that was $189.7 billion. The Obama administration estimates that the total federal budget deficit for the fiscal year ending in September will be $1.84 trillion. This compares to a total federal budget deficit of $455 billion for fiscal year 2008.
 
If the Obama administration estimates are correct, and its estimates have been on the low side, the US federal budget deficit will have increased a whopping 304% in just one year. No matter who is at fault for the deficit, one thing is clear, the federal budget deficit is growing at an alarming rate.
 
To illustrate how financially disastrous this could be, the US federal government is like a person who decides to run up credit card debt and take out a second mortgage after receiving a pay cut. This leads to a lower credit rating, which leads to higher interest rates, which leads to a further deterioration of financial health. This is a financial death spiral.
 
In fact, US government bond prices are dropping, pushing interest rates higher because of “the need of the US government to print more money to meet its massive borrowing needs,” according to the Wall Street Journal MarketBeat. Russia, along with Brazil, India, and China, is concerned the US cannot be trusted to repay its debt. Unfortunately, the US desperately needs these countries to continue to finance its massive debt.
 
The solution for the US government is no more complex than it is for a person receiving a pay cut: stop additional borrowing immediately and reduce expenses now. The only hope for restoring income lost following a pay cut is from increasing productivity, not increasing borrowing. Running up additional debt at an ever-accelerating pace will lead to unstoppable total financial disaster.
 
The US is in a difficult situation, but the solution is clear. Even though most American political leaders are unwilling to face the truth and make hard choices, the American people must resolve as a society to protect the health of the nation. This will include hard work and significant sacrifices on their part, but every generation of Americans has made whatever sacrifices were required. It is our turn now.
 
Politicians, however, often let politics get in the way of solutions that require sacrifice and hard work.
 
President Obama understands the difficulty of asking the voters who elected him to make the sacrifices needed to save the nation. As Derek Thompson writes at TheAtlantic.com, “Obama might be a revolutionary, but he's not a masochist. So more likely we'll continue to kick the can down the road. The deficit will continue to be the next next issue. And we'll see not the return, but the continuation of America's grand debt-payment tradition: Delay-as-you-go.”
 
Kicking the can down the road, delay-as-you-go, will only lead to the continued destruction of the American standard of living. It’s time to face facts and make tough decisions, before it’s too late.

This piece first appeared on the STEWARD of Prosperity website and is used with permission.

 

JFK & Obama: The contrast is more than just black and white...

 

What does SHE have to do with anything?

Michelle Obama

Other than being the newly crowned fashion queen, what does the President's wife really have to do with anything in the life of an ordinary citizen? Elected to nothing, what business does the First Lady have with legislation and budget and economic issues? And what exactly does she know about such matters, anyway? While I might take sleeveless tunic advice from Michelle Obama, what more does she have to offer a plain 'ole Granite Stater like me? Well, apparently, she has about four and a half million bucks to hand out, actually. From the White House Media Office:

Washington, DC – First Lady Michelle Obama today announced the release of $4,570,592 in grants to community health centers in New Hampshire. The grants will help address immediate and pressing health center facility and equipment needs and increase access to health care for millions in New Hampshire.  The money was made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and comes as more Americans join the ranks of the uninsured due to the economic downturn and skyrocketing health costs.

“Community Health Centers provide care to the Americans who need it most and their work has never been more important,” said Obama. “These grants will help centers in New Hampshire serve more Americans who simply can’t afford insurance coverage anymore.”

The Recovery Act Capital Improvement Program (CIP) grants will support the construction, repair and renovation of over 1,500 health center sites nationwide. More than 650 centers will use the funds to purchase new equipment or health information technology (HIT) systems, and nearly 400 health centers will adopt and expand the use of electronic health records.

To see a list of Recovery Act CIP grantees in New Hampshire, go to http://transparency.cit.nih.gov/RecoveryGrants/grant.cfm?grant=HRSA_CIP

Health centers deliver preventive and primary care services at more than 7,500 service delivery sites around the country to patients regardless of their ability to pay; charges for services are set according to income.  Health centers serve more than 17 million patients, about 40 percent of whom have no health insurance. Community Health Centers are the responsibility of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).

The Capitol Improvement grant awards are the third set of health center grants provided through the Recovery Act.  On March 2, President Obama announced grants worth $155 million to establish 126 new health center sites.  Those grants will provide access to essential preventive and primary health care for more than 750,000 people in 39 states and two territories.

On March 27, HHS also awarded $338 Million in Increased Demand for Services grants for health centers. Health centers are using these Increased Demand for Services grants to provide care to more than 2 million additional patients over the next two years, including approximately 1 million uninsured people.

Yep. This'll sure help what ails the American economy the most: more "socialized" health care that we already can't afford. Thanks a lot Mrs. Obama. THANKS FOR NUTHIN'!

 

 

June 29, 2009

Boehner: National Energy Tax Punishes American Families

blinded

Democrats "studying" the bill...

Guest Post by Congressman John Boehner

If there’s one thing the American people should demand of their elected representatives, it’s that’s we should know what’s in bills before we vote on them.  Unfortunately, that seems to be too much to ask of the Democratic-controlled U.S. House, which under the heavy hand of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has once again rushed sweeping legislation to passage without appropriate scrutiny or sufficient time for public review.

In February, the U.S. House passed a 1,100-page economic “stimulus” bill that (according to the White House) was supposed to create 3.5 million jobs and keep unemployment no higher than 8 percent.  Since that bill was signed into law by President Obama, we’ve lost 1.6 million jobs nationwide, and unemployment nationwide is now 9.4 percent.  The so-called "stimulus" has been a disaster in my home state of Ohio, where our unemployment is a record-breaking 10.8 percent. 

The House late on Friday, June 26, passed Speaker Pelosi’s new national energy tax – a more than 1,500 page bill that included 300 pages added to it fewer than 24 hours in the dark of night before the final vote.  No one – not one single lawmaker – had read the entire bill before voting on it.  So I did what I had to do: using my privileges as Minority Leader, I took to the floor and read portions of those 300 pages to the American people before the final vote.  By tradition, the Speaker of the House, the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader have the right to talk for as long as they like on the Floor.  I used my prerogative as the Minority Leader to read to the American people parts of a bill that will raise their taxes, send American jobs overseas and punish hard-working, middle-class families with higher energy costs.

I had hoped that lawmakers would understand that this new national energy tax on middle class families would further punish people who are struggling to make ends meet.  At the very least, I and my colleagues believed the American people deserved a more open and honest debate over the contents of the bill and its implications for our country, which is still struggling through a deep recession.  But in the end, in another exercise of legislating by brute force, political muscle applied by Speaker Pelosi and former Vice President Al Gore on behalf of radical special-interests carried the day, and the measure was narrowly passed.

What took place in the House Friday is a stinging slap in the face for suffering American families and small businesses.  A backroom deal was struck between powerful Democratic politicians in Washington and powerful interests who got special "carve-outs" in the final bill to ensure the higher costs and higher taxes imposed by the Speaker's bill will apply to ordinary citizens and small business owners, but not to them.  

Americans want clean energy, and a clean environment.  There is a better route to these goals than the one embodied in the bill passed on the floor of the House last night, and Republicans have offered it:

 

a comprehensive "all of the above" energy reform strategy that will increase environmentally-responsible production of American energy and reinvest a share of the royalities from such production into development and expanded use of clean, alternative energy across our country.  It's a strategy that will create American jobs instead of destroying them; one that will lower costs for American families and small businesses rather than raising them at a time of economic hardship.  This approach is advocated by Republican governors and Members of Congress standing together for real solutions to the challenges facing our country.  It hasn't seen the light of day in Democratic-controlled Washington.

Our economy is hemorrhaging jobs at a frightening pace, and middle class Americans are suffering.  Legislation like Speaker Pelosi’s massive national energy tax that she rammed through the House will only punish hard-working families even more.  Every family who has the audacity to turn on their TV, flip on a light-switch and put gas in their car will pay more for it.  Family farmers, whose energy costs account for 60 percent of their spending, are going to see their fuel costs, especially diesel, skyrockets while their incomes plummet.  Meanwhile, elite special-interests whose lobbyists made backroom deals with congressional Democrats in the dark of night will be exempt.

Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax is a job-killer.  It will punish responsible American families with crushing taxes that will suffocate our economy.  It creates a slew of new government programs to take and redistribute trillions of dollars away from our families overseen by a tangled web of government agencies that will ultimately answer to the Environmental Protection Agency.

While government bureaucrats squabble over how best to regulate our lives, other countries are moving ahead with innovations and technologies that are propelling their economies in front of ours.  And while American manufacturing companies and energy-intensive industries shutter their doors, foreign nations that don’t impose punitive taxes will roll out the welcome mat.  The next time you wonder where the jobs are, take a look at China, India and other countries that refuse failed policies like the cap-and-trade scheme that makes up Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax – that’s where our jobs have gone.

Minority Leader John Boehner represents the 8th Congressional District of Ohio.

Guinta slams Shea-Porter on her vote for new energy taxes on NH citizens

Carol Shea Porter

D'uh.

In a statement released today, Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta rightfully slams Carol Shea Porter for her vote on the Cap and Trade energy tax bill:

Once again standing with Speaker Pelosi, not NH Hampshire residents:Carol Shea-Porter Votes for the Job Killing Waxman-Markey National Energy Tax

Shea-Porter Casts Critical Vote that could Cost Constituents Millions of Dollars and Thousands of Jobs

Manchester- On Friday, June 26th, at the behest of Speaker Pelosi, Carol Shea-Porter voted for the job-killing Waxman-Markey National Energy Tax, this a "cap-and-trade" scheme that will destroy New Hampshire jobs, as well as jobs across America , raise prices for gasoline, electricity, and other sources of energy, and devastate middle-class families and small businesses. This vote is just another example of how Carol Shea-Porter’s blind allegiance to her parties’ leadership is costing New Hampshire businesses and families money and hurting our economy. 

The energy tax legislation ballooned from 946 pages when it was released last week, to more than 1,200 pages at the time it was voted on. This caused many, including the non-partisan Sunlight Foundation to ask Speaker Nancy Pelosi to slow down so that reps can actually read the fine print before voting. Instead democrat leaders reportedly spent the whole day on Friday, right up to the last minute trying to keep their slim margin intact.  Shea-Porter's support was crucial to passing this latest installment of legislation that is out of step with the needs and priorities of New Hampshire voters.

“At the behest of Speaker Pelosi, Carol Shea-Porter voted to force New Hampshire residents who drive a car or flip on a light switch to pay a national energy tax,” said Manchester Mayor and First Congressional District Candidate Frank Guinta.  New Hampshire voters want solutions that will produce more environmentally safe American energy and get us closer to energy independence; they want solutions that encourage the use of alternative fuels and reduce carbon emissions.  They certainly don’t want ill conceived legislation that in less than three years according to the Heritage Foundation could cost New Hampshire more than $550 million and 4,900 jobs.


Debunking the myths surrounding NH's new budget

Democrats chasing myths
Guest post by NH State Senator Jeb Bradley...

Supporters of the recently enacted State of New Hampshire budget were quick to claim that it was responsible and that they made tough decisions during difficult economic times. Talk about myth and spin - this budget fits the bill - literally!

Myth #1:  State spending will decrease in the next two years.  Sounds great doesn't it? Unfortunately, this is flat out wrong. Here are the facts: According to the Legislative Budget Assistant--the non-partisan office that is charged with preparing budget figures--total authorized spending in the current budget, which will close June 30, is $10.408 billion. The budget that was just approved and will begin July 1 authorizes spending of $11.499 billion, an increase of $1.091 billion or 10.48% by every known method of mathematics! How can these budget supporters possibly justify this huge increase when people are struggling to pay their bills and now will struggle to pay the higher taxes and fees contained in the budget? This 10.48% increase also comes at a time when other states around the nation on average are actually reducing spending!

Myth #2: The new tax on campsites closes a loophole. If budget writers really thought this tax on camping was closing a loophole it is hard to imagine why they would have introduced it in the wee hours of the night without a public hearing. The fact is that it is a brand new 9% tax on camping. It is positively amazing how supporters of this budget claim to be the politicians that support the little guy.  This budget not only taxes camping, it hikes taxes or fees on meals, tobacco, boat & car registration, salt water fishing licenses and most importantly, property taxes. Nothing can hide the fact that New Hampshire citizens of modest means will be digging deeper into their already empty wallets.

 

Myth#3: The tax on limited liability companies (LLCs) also closes a loophole.  Again, if this was a loophole – why no public hearing? This tax will impact approximately 10,000 small business owners organized as LLCs who will now be subject to the 5% Interest and Dividends Tax.  Without any rules yet promulgated, who knows if this will be a tax on interest or dividends---or a tax on the compensation a business owner pays him or herself. If this taxes a business owner’s compensation in the same way the Business Profits tax is applied -- against so-called excessive compensation -- then New Hampshire will be sending a terrible message to those very people we want to invest in the state and create jobs. Perhaps the supporters of this budget are spinning this as a business owner loophole because in reality they want an income tax!

Myth #4: If the budget were not enacted the cost to the State under a continuing resolution to keep government running would be $11 million per month. This takes the cake for spinning a myth. There is no reason whatsoever that spending for a short period could not have been authorized at 98% of existing levels to ensure deficits were not created. This is precisely what could have been done for the entire budget in order to avoid all the tax and fee hikes that will hurt working families and small businesses.

Myth #5: This budget is balanced. Whether the budget is actually balanced will not be known for some time. However, this budget relies on $75 million of magically inflated revenue estimates and a $110 million raid on a fund paid into by doctors to reduce medical liability costs. This raid is already the subject of litigation and the STATE JUST LOST THE FIRST ROUND IN COURT! Given these problems, it is hard to imagine the budget being balanced when it closes in two years.

Unfortunately, the really difficult choices were left for the next budget when the $500 million dollars of one-time revenue sources runs dry. The stage will be set in the next budget for the penultimate debate of whether this state adopts an income or sales tax or both. Even if the state were to allow expanded gaming, it will not be enough to fill this spending sink hole!

My grateful thanks to everyone who has written me with comments on these email updates. I appreciate all the information and ideas that you have provided. With the close of the legislative session in Concord, I won’t email updates until the fall. Please however monitor my web-site www.jebforstatesenate.com for occasional discussion about issues ranging from global warming legislation to healthcare.  Hope to see you climbing in the White Mountains this summer!  


 

Gee, it took you this long to figure out that we aren't all that special?

Cute!

Caution - one word may not be Work safe so keep the volume down


(H/T: Tom)

June 28, 2009

The Liberals say we have to tax more for the most vulnerable

Well, they are starting to make the small companies that employ the people that pay the taxes that "protect the most vulnerable" (hmm, tell me, WHY is it that we need Government to be the in-between for charity actions again?). In short, proponents of Government doing more and more (and requiring more in order to do so) are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. 

Our good friend DCE from WeekendPundit also has another blog called One Voice in Gilford where he talks to this:

How is it a $1.4 billion increase in state spending is seen as 'cuts' by the New Hampshire House, Senate, and governor?  Between a 17.5% increase in the last budget and a13.7% increase in this budget, state spending has skyrocketed 31.2% in four years...

...If the budget passes as written, over 45,000 small businesses in the state will be paying an income tax (though the legislature doesn't call it that). One of those small businesses will be the one owned by my wife and I.

So how is all of this supposed to increase state revenues if the tax increases end up turning marginally profitable businesses into unprofitable ones (and forcing some to close)? They haven't explained that, either.

There seems to be more evidence for this, as the TaxProf let's us know:

Taxes as a Cause of Small Business Bankruptcies

Rafael Efrat
(California State University-Northridge, College of Business and Economics) has published The Tax Burden and the Propensity of Small-Business Entrepreneurs to File For Bankruptcy, 4 Hastings Bus. L.J. 175 (2008).  Here is the Conclusion:

 

Consistent with the growing tax burden on small-business owners, as well as the growing body of evidence linking higher tax burden with limited entrepreneurial growth and higher closure rates, this study has found that tax problems constitute an important reason for bankruptcy filings for a sizable number of entrepreneurs. Interestingly, those entrepreneurs that attribute their business collapse to tax problems do not come from disadvantageous background. Instead, the average entrepreneur in the bankruptcy sample that has faulted tax problems for his financial woes was typically older male, white, native-born, well-educated and an experienced business owner. Nonetheless, the typical entrepreneur with tax problem in the bankruptcy sample was facing enormously higher debt burden with more than five times as much debts as other entrepreneurs in the bankruptcy sample.

 

We are given the impression that most bankruptcies are medically grounded.  I just wonder when the media would grab onto this topic - you KNOW that most Progressive politicians will not bring this up (I remember Hillary Clinton's famous line about "undercapitalized entrepreneurs" not able to pay increased costs from her stab at pushing nationalized healthcare back in the early '90s).

I wonder if this will become more of an issue at the $1.6 Trillion cost of Obamacare sinks in (and still leaves people "uninsured" - and some estimates go multiples higher)?

Just imagine... We MUST stand with these people, yearning to be free of the Islamo-fascist shackles that bind them.

I found this video most telling (and disturbing). It appears that a large gathering of protesters all hit the street on a given signal, which is followed by gunmen firing into the crowd, and a man can be seen getting shot. I cannot imagine the feeling of helplessness one must experience being a "subject" living in a dictatorial country like this. Such is the life of a disarmed general population. Imagine if the people had some guns with which to shoot back. Are we witnessing our own future, if we're not careful?

 

 

Click here for more videos from both within Iran, and of solidarity demonstrations around the world.

Beware those that do not learn their history...

Obama's own book, Dreams From My Father, said that he always sought out the socialists and Marxists when he moved from school to school during college.  Given the influence of his self-avowed Communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, while he was growing up in Hawaii, I am not surprised at all at his tendency to want to make Government / the collective the locus of everyone's life instead of extolling the individual.

Socialism has been tried here in America before.  The earliest versions of socialism / communal living did not work out well at all (as one can see from one of my Thanksgiving Day posts).  That said, I was not aware how many times people thought that they could make it work (misguided fools)!

This post by Ryan Seifert over at American Thinker has a whole lot more on this:

There seems to be a need in American society to have to relearn the same hard lessons over and over again, regardless of whether the results were seen on the other side of the planet or suffered through by our own people.

We're living in a country that elected a President that believes in redistributing wealth. He's mentioned this himself, from the "Joe the Plumber" incident[i] to his critique[ii] of the failures of the civil rights movement. Whether you call it Socialism, Communism, Marxism, or by its simpler name, theft, they are all part of the same economic system that destroys private property and puts everything in central control of the state.

The lesson we, and the rest of the world, seems to fail to learn is how socially and economically destructive this sort of system is. The problem is, these lessons don't have to be learned from studying the histories of far off lands, for we have numerous examples of collectivist/socialist experiments here at home.

He goes on with his examples, which I urge you to read:
  • Jamestown
  • Pilgrims (my example) 
  • New Haven - 1825 by Robert Owen
  • Another set of communes by Charles Fourier (none last more than 12 years)
  • 1804 - Harmony in Pennsylvania (which was moved, sold, and died later)
  • 1841 - The "Perfectionists" failed

He also brought up one line of thought that is utterly 1984 Doublespeak in its dunderheadedness - slavery is complete freedom:

George Fitzhugh, an influence on Berry, actually argued that slave labor was preferable because the slaves were ultimately free. It was property owners and free laborers that were the slaves. He advocated that taking decision-making out of the hands of individuals made the African slaves better off than free whites and claimed that not only all blacks, but most whites too, should be slaves.[xiv] His theory was ultimately squashed with the support and ratification of the 13th and 14th Amendments, which not only freed the slaves but also established they had constitutionally protected private property rights.

Sadly, this current thinking is seeming the heart of the new Liberalism - let us remove all responsibility from citizens in having to worry about their daily living - let Government take care of decision making.  After all - what could go wrong?  Government is here to help you!

Ryan's lesson?

These few examples, and there are more out there, show how American culture even before the Civil War (or the War of Northern Aggression, depending on your location) tried communal living and centrally planned economic models. Despite the good intentions of the people involved, they always fail because of the inherent flaws in Socialism. Unfortunately, given the reach of the federal government and current make-up of the executive and legislative branches, we are set to learn this lesson the hard way. Again.

The moral of the story?  Each time, Government or the collective is placed in a importance and priority above that of the individual, it fails.  Socialism believes that altruism can reign supreme over long periods of time, that we can and should put our fellow man and society as a whole ahead of one's own interests - and it is wrong.  Too often, people game the socialist system because of their own self-interest, which is the problem.  No, not the gaming, but that the role of self-interest is channeled negatively.  Capitalism allows for the self-interest to work for positive outcomes, not only for the individual and one's immediate family, but for society as a whole.

Notable Quote - Worlds of Warcraft

World of Warcraft is a huge multi-player online fantasy game with various kinds of roles.  Not exactly where I would have expected a Notable Quote to originate from.  However, TMEW (The Most Esteemed Wife) forwarded this over to me:

Maturity is knowing  you were an idiot in the past, wisdom is knowing you will be an idiot in the future and common sense is knowing you should not be an idiot right know.

-Unknown

Why didn't he talk about the spreading of HIV?

And this is part of the reason why Government / Socialized / Nationalized healthcare will fail (I'll leave the crony capitalism, like when companies like GE go running to the Feds to take their position at the biggest financial teat possible):

political correctness

Read the following missive from President Obama:

WASHINGTON (AFP) – President Barack Obama on Saturday urged his fellow Americans to get tested for HIV in an effort to reduce transmission of the virus that causes AIDS.

"On this 14th commemoration of National HIV Testing Day, I urge Americans to take control of their own health -- and protect those they love -- by getting tested for HIV and working to reduce HIV transmission," Obama said in a statement.

"While its impacts are not evenly spread -- infection rates are particularly high among gay and bisexual men, African Americans and Latinos -- when one of our fellow citizens becomes infected with HIV every nine-and-a-half minutes, the epidemic affects all Americans," he said.

Obama noted that of the estimated 1.15 million people infected with HIV in the United States, more than 230,000 -- one in five -- do not know they are infected.

The US president last month unveiled a plan to commit 63 billion dollars over six years to battle chronic global health crises, including AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, a continuation of a landmark initiative launched by his predecessor George W. Bush.

This is as bad as President Bush who labeled the War on Terror just that and not what it really is - the "War by Islamofascists on Western culture". If one cannot, or refuses to, name the root cause of a problem, the problem cannot be solved.

Obama's stated idea on driving healthcare costs down is to do more preventative care - catching things early in a prognostic manner.  Fine - that is a correct idea.  He and his wife have also been harping on the fact that we all have to be living more healthy lives - fine and dandy 

My problem?   When will Obama talk to the root cause of HIV spreading? That is where the Political Correctness holds sway - he won't.

There are those unfortunate souls that have been infected by medical procedures (e.g., blood transfusions, contaminated medical devices) - my heart goes out to them as they have acquired AIDS through no fault of their own.  That said, the biggest transmission method is unprotected, promiscuous sex from those that are unmarried or cheating on their spouses - it cannot get any more basic than that. With the current air of "never assigning blame except to those cold, hearted conservatives", the message of the best of restricting the spread of AIDS, monogamous relationships for life, will never leave his lips nor become policy.

Obama wants all of us to get ourselves tested for HIV - what a silly idea for the vast majority of Americans and a HUGE waste of money. In this case, Obama is advocating only for a "second stage" level of responsibility - not concerning the act actually spreads the disease but for public money to be used to treat it after the fact.

Political correctness is going to further lead to a lessening of individual responsibility as he wishes to treat the results of poor behavior and not the behavior itself.

Freedom has a twin companion - self-responsibility.  Too often, it seems, freedom is more and more defined as freedom from responsibility as opposed to its real role - freedom can only be kept by exercising self-responsibility (and at times, self-restraint).  When one gives away one's responsibility to a third party, one will become a slave to that third party.

Unfortunately, that's what many crying out for nationalized healthcare want - they are willing to cede their freedom for healthcare security.  That is not being responsible.

 

June 27, 2009

Renegade Republicans

The following Republicans, at both the NH State and Federal levels, will add NOTHING to rebuilding the brand of the Republican Party.  While there may be many that will invoke Reagan's 11th Commandment ("Thou shalt not speak evil of a fellow Republican"), I disagree with that thought.  I also disagree that no judgment should be passed against those that transgress the most central and primary philisophical pillars of Republicanism:

  • Smaller and less intrusive Government
  • Less taxes

If one tolerates this behavior, is no one takes them to task, what is to prevent them (or others) and  dissuade them from acting in such a manner again?  If Republicans are to be able to point out that we stand for something, it does us no good when those that we are trying to persuade can point out spectacular transgressions.  Not only have they harmed their constituents and citizens in general by subjecting them in higher levies and less individual freedom as well as aiding the enlarging of the Nanny State, they undermine the credibility of other Republicans.  Although I prefer to consider myself as a Conservative that aligns myself with the Republican Party, it still makes it rather difficult as I say one thing while my conversationalists poke holes with valid examples that destroy what I can say.

At the State Level on HB-1 (Appropriations) , we have the following House Republitards:

I would have posted their pictures, but only Vaillancourt has one on his House webpage.

HB2 (taxes)?  The same transgressor (minus Kenneth Gould). However, in the Senate for both HB1 & HB2, I put the blame squarely on Bob Odel (R-Lempster).  These people are responsible for a larger and higher taxing NH Government a 23% rise in spending / taxing over the last two budgets.

However, the actions of those above simply pale to the following Republicans in the US House of Representatives.  Not only is the scale an order magnitude higher (Trillions vs billions), they have agreed that, with over 1,300 mandates and regulations in the Waxman / Markey Cap and Tax bill.

NOTE: 300 pages inserted into the bill Friday morning around 3am.

Once again (like the Porkulus), THEY DIDN'T EVEN READ THE BILL !!!!!!

Talk about a dereliction of duty !!

GOP Cap and Trade Traitors
  • Bono Mack (CA) (202) 225-5330
  • Castle (DE) (202) 225-4165
  • Kirk (IL) (202) 225-4385 (And he’s seriously considering running for Senate!)
  • Lance (NJ) (202) 225-5361
  • LoBiondo (NJ) (202) 225-6572
  • McHugh (NY) (202) 225-4611
  • Reichert (WA) (202) 225-7761
  • Smith (NJ) (202) 225-3765

As Paul from Powerline put it (emphasis mine):

But the eight Republicans still (a) voted for job-killing legislation rushed through before anyone could know exactly what it entails and (b) gave aid and comfort to some Democratic representatives by enabling them to avoid paying a political price for a "yea" vote they were prepared to provide if Speaker Pelosi needed it.

Aiding and abetting the Democrats...and shafting the middle class.  2010 is coming - these folks' constituents should remember come voting day why they have less in their pockets and why everything has become so much more expensive - and sending money overseas directly to China for "not chopping down trees".

(H/Ts: Jane, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin

This also:  Rules state that they have 5 days from the vote to change theirs.  CapAndTr8tors is a website to track these dopes (with a countdown).

REMEMBER - if ONLY 4 of them had changed their vote, it would have failed!

(H/T: capandtr8tors via Instapundit)

Meet The New Press - Podcast for 06/27/09

Meet the New Press Podcast 

The MTNP Podcast page is brought to you by:
.

                                                                
Meet The New Press
Radio at the speed of the Blogosphere! 
WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 9am-11am (EDT)
Streaming Live!

To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to save the file for you.

Week of 6/27/09
(Click here for accompanying links)
 
Hour 1              Hour 2

Hour One: 

Jack Kimball from the Granite State Patriots came on to talk about this past week's Tea Party event at the State House on Wednesday - we listen to his reading of the NH Tea Party Coalition's Citizens' Pledge (video here of the speeches; more to come - The Citizens' Pledge is also after the jump and we encourage you to read it, download it, sign it, and stick it on your 'fridge to remind yourself come voting day!).   Part 1    Part 2

Michael Kitch from the Laconia Daily Sun has been doing a bang up job on reporting on the State's attempt to steal "the excess" monies from the Joint Underwriting Association - simply put, a fund financied by the premiums by healthcare providers.  If the providers are successful on blocking this raid on this fund, the State has to go back and redo the budget due to this "loss" of $110 million.   Part 1   Part 2

Hour Two:  

Amil Imari returns to the MTNP airways to discuss the happenings in Iran over the mullahs' theocratic ways to steal the Presidential election away from the people (imagine that, they can count 10s of millions of paper ballots in a couple of hours and declare Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner.  We talk about how brutal the regime is to its own citizens and the stories around it.  Part 1   Part 2

The guys talk about the US House of Representatives pass the "Tax on all Americans Who Use Energy" bill - and the ramifications of what will happen.  Nope, the gang takes the stand that this will NOT make us energy independent, it will NOT create jobs, and engender prosperity.

It WILL, however, make China and India much wealthier.  We also talk about Carol Shea-Porter canned release.   Part 1   Part 2

SchlubCam:

Segment 1     Break 1     Segment 2     Break 2     Segment 3     Break 3

Segment 4     Break 4     Segment 5     Break 5     Segment 6     Break 6

Segment 7     Break 7     Segment 8     AfterShow
NH Tea Party Coalition Citizen Pledge

On the Cap and Trade energy tax bill

This lady is quickly becoming one of our favorite members of the present US House... Minnesota Republican Representative Michele Bachmann on Waxman/Markey energy tax bill:

"We know this will result in a reduced standard of living for Americans."

 

Shame on the Iranian Government. Sign the petition to help stop the slaughter of Iranian freedom-seekers.

Iran thugs

"30 years ago Jimmy Carter defamed the Shah of Iran for Human Rights Violations, paving the way for Islamic Republic. Why is he so silent of the atrocities in Iran now?"

Please join the fight to free Iran by signing our petition by clicking here. It reads:

To:  Honorable Leaders of the Free World, Honorable Citizens of the World, Honorable Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations

The life that God gives, no man should extinguish. The illegitimate mullahs presently ruling Iran blatantly violate this sacred covenant by shooting at a large number of peaceful demonstrators who are demanding nothing more than their God-Given-Right to liberty and pursuit of happiness. The mullahs and their mercenaries are wasting precious human life to maintain themselves in power through terrorizing the population.

Our hearts are bleeding watching how brutally the government agents are beating up the children and assault them in their dormitories at night while they are sleeping or invade the sanctuary of their homes to beat them up or arrest them. Regretfully, the ruling regime sees these actions as part of their sacred duty. They see any defiance to the supreme leader as defiance to God. They call the demonstrators who just want their voices to be heard "terrorists," “thugs” and “agents of foreign governments.” If they do not shoot people outright, they savagely attack them with axes, chains, batons and any other crude weapons they can get their hands on.

We call upon the free governments of the world, as well as all other businesses, organizations and individuals to enlist in a non-violent campaign of ending the reign of terror of the belligerent clerical regime. Governments should enact the following:

 

* Renounce the use of force for ending the impasse.

* Declare unequivocally the commitment to respect the territorial integrity of Iran, as well as the rights of the Iranians to decide, through a democratic process, all matters pertaining to their life and country.

* Initiate, without delay or equivocation, a comprehensive program of assistance to all democratic Iranian opposition groups, both within as well as outside of Iran, in their struggle to accomplish the regime change themselves.

* Proclaim wide and far, the cardinal reason for taking these measures against the Mullahs' reign of terror is to prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons, the threat they pose to the region as well as to the world, and the stimulus they provide for other nations to develop their own nuclear arsenal.

* Enforce the U.N. sanctions by inspecting every vessel headed for Iranian ports to make sure they are not ferrying prohibited material. Other than vessels known to be carrying foodstuff and medicine, each ship should be subjected to elaborate inspection.

* Establish an Iran Assistance Fund, from Iran’s frozen assets as well as contributions from peace-loving individuals and organizations, to assist Iranian families during the hardship that the sanctions may create.

* Persuade Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and other Persian Gulf oil producers to significantly increase their output and drastically cut the price. It is what they must do to help forestall the emergence of a nuclear clerical Iran bent on ruling the region.

* Obtain court orders to freeze the overseas assets of Iranian leaders, since they are clearly ill-begotten funds that rightfully belong to the nation.

* Shut down, or severely restrict the operation of the Mullahs' businesses in Dubai and other Persian Gulf states.

* Reduce the staff or completely shut down Iranian missions. Severely restrict Iranian officials and nuclear scientists from foreign travel. Recall your ambassadors from Iran.

* Deny the Iranian airlines operation and encourage non-Iranian airlines to cease serving the country. Provide for flights that serve emergency medical and other health needs of the Iranians.

* File legal charges against the leaders of the Islamic Republic's wanton violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; for their crimes against humanity, genocidal actions against religious and political groups; for support of international terrorism; for demolition of religious sites and cemeteries; for rape, torture, and summary execution of prisoners of conscience; for forgery of documents, for acts of blackmail and fraud, and much more.

* Declare and treat the clerical regime as illegitimate.

* Stop or slow down Iran's import of refined petroleum products.

* Shut down the Islamic Republic's web sites and block their television and radio broadcasts.

* Locate and seize the regime's front organizations such as Alavi Foundation in New York City.

* Identify the agents of the Islamic Republic and prosecute them as promoters of international terrorism.

* Investigate individuals and organizations that lobby or front for the Islamic Republic.

* Take all necessary steps to stop investments in Iran. Persuade banks to refrain from dealing with Iran and the issuance of letters of credit.

* Pressure businesses to stop dealing with Iran.

* Pressure governments to stop doing business with Iran. Warn countries such as China and Russia against circumventing the U.N. resolution and engaging in commercial adventurism.

We, the undersigned, are greatly concerned that the confrontational course of the illegitimate clerical regime of Iran may ignite the flame of war. We urge the leadership as well as people of the world to join in the non-violent campaign of dislodging the mullahs and helping Iranians to establish a secular democracy. The Iran problem is both serious and urgent. It is a world problem. A warning to the world governments and others: You need to act now. Apathy is sleep. If you sleep, we will all weep.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

[click here to sign]

[view current signatures]


 

Unions - one for all and all for....oh, never mind...

And unions bash the companies for whom they work for not caring about the little guys:

A last-ditch effort to avoid the layoffs of 100 Michigan State Police troopers has failed.

Members of the Michigan State Police Troopers Association voted against a furlough plan that would have called for sacrificing some of their own pay to temporarily avoid the layoffs of their low-seniority co-workers.

The outcome of the vote was announced Friday but vote totals weren't released.

Trooper layoffs will begin Sunday.

The layoffs are expected to save the cash-starved state $1.7 million in the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. Most of those affected were hired after finishing trooper school in December.

Even if the furlough plan had been approved, there was no guarantee the low-seniority officers would have kept their jobs in the next budget year.

In this case, the little guys are their brothers-in-arms, the newest fellow officers.  Where's the solidarity there, guys? Or does it really show that when the rubber hits the road, it is all about self-interest?

Now, I have no problem with self-interest at all!  However, as Liberals go and bash SC Gov. Sanford for being hypocritical for violating his vows (given his stance on traditional family values), shouldn't they also be bashing the union for violating theirs?

June 26, 2009

MTNP Radio. Freedom's last outpost?

Skellig Michael

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am!

As usual, this week's broadcast version of GraniteGrok and Now!Hampshire.com brings an array of items and guests for your consideration-- ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here for instructions on how to connect and listen on the Internet via livestream. (Podcasts here)

  • Businessman Jack Kimball is the head of the Granite State Patriots (GSP) group, and is most well known for the prominent message board sign that he uses to push out messages of activism and patriotism to all that go by on a daily basis. His speeches have electrified and energized crowds at a series of rallies and Tea Parties around the state. The GSP "Platform" states it exists to
To actively support our troops and our country on the Home Front by:

  • Aggressively countering any planned Anti-American, Anti-Israeli, Pro Hamas (or other terrorist groups), Anti-war demonstrations within a one hour radius of Portsmouth, NH.
  • Going on the offensive with our own Pro USA, Israel, Troop demonstrations at pre-planned locations and dates.
  • Determining who is behind any Anti-American, Anti-Israeli or Pro-terrorist organizations and exposing them to the Public.  This would include individuals such as college Professors, High School Teachers, Politicians, Newspapers or anyone else who is found to be doing this.  This may also include showing up, in force, at their college or school and exposing them.
  • The organization will protect and defend the Constitution of the USA and also expose our new President when his policies or actions are detrimental to our Troops, our Constitution, our Veterans, or our Country's well being.

Jack spoke at this week's Tea Party rally where he read the NH Tea Party Coalition's Citizen Pledge. We'll discuss the rally, the pledge, and what happened in NH this week with the passage of the budget. He'll stay with us throughout the program as we discuss the Cap & Trade tax scheme, the nationalization of our health care system, and other fun and exciting topics.

Michael Kitch has been doing some excellent reporting in the Laconia Daily Sun on the legal battle surrounding the state's raid on the Joint Underwriting Association.

Michael joins us to explain this rather strange place for the state to take money- a malpractice medical insurance fund. It seems as though the very sanctity of contracts and trust itself is at stake here. And what happens to the state's budget should it lose in Court?

  • Frequent 'Grok contributor Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. He and his family escaped Iran after the radical Islamic revolution. His observations on the growing Islamo-fascist threat need to be heard and understood by as many people as possible if we are going to stem the tide.

We'll discuss ongoing events in his home land of Iran. We'll find out the real scoop behind the players, the real numbers both in terms of the recent sham elections and the deathtoll from recent violence and the government backlash. An email making the rounds this week featured a picture of a beautiful young woman killed in the violence-- wearing a Christian Cross around her neck. Amil wrote a tribute piece to her memory, Neda: Angel of Freedom. We'll ask Amil what he thinks the chances are for real change coming to Iran, and what it could mean for Western/ Islamic relations, long term.

  • And of course, ===============>> Your calls are encouraged at 603 527 1490.

It all starts at 9AM EST Saturday. Tune in if you're in Central NH at NewsTalk 1490AM WEMJ or live on the 'Net here... This is not your Poppy's radio show. No "pretenders" here! Wink


Friday Humor - the late edition

OK, this is late....but after the vote today in the US House of Statists (where the Democrats just voted in the largest tax on people in world history AND added over 1,300 mandates and regulations on top of that), I needed a smile.

Lori over at ConChrist provided such:

Carnivore trumps Vegan 

Watch Cap & Trade TAX Debate LIVE. Boehner is ON A ROLL!

rush hour in china
Rush hour in China. After Cap & Trade, they'll be the ones driving the SUVs & selling their bicycles to us.
Watch the US House debate live by clicking here. Watch C-Span even if you don't have cable. Pretty cool. Too bad the subject has such a horrible possible outcome.

Boehner:

"All pain for the United States' citizens and no gain..."

Update for NH citizens for the "American Energy Tax bill known as the Waxman / Markey Cap and Trade"

I just called my Congressman's office - Carol Shea-Porter (for those of you in CD-1, her Washington office is 202-225-5456).  Here is here official statement:

The Congresswoman supports the America Clean Energy and Security Act.  For the average cost of a postage stamp each day, the bill will create jobs, protect our environment, and strengthen our national security.

So, Carol Shea-Porter either will or just has voted to increase each NH family's cost of energy by $642.40.  10 Years?  35 years?.  This:

When the Heritage Foundation did its analysis of Waxman-Markey, it broadly compared the economy with and without the carbon tax. Under this more comprehensive scenario, it found Waxman-Markey would cost the economy $161 billion in 2020, which is $1,870 for a family of four. As the bill’s restrictions kick in, that number rises to $6,800 for a family of four by 2035.

Remember that every time you put gas in the car, buy some product, or come winter when she proudly proclaims that she is trying to get "free heating money" -> she helped to take more money out of your pocket and less to spend for your family

Remember, the Trillions that will be taken from us will result in a measly 0.18 degree C reduction of warming (if there really is one - where's my summer!) over what would happen if we did nothing.

Which is exactly what China and India are about to do.

In fact, this bill is going to end up with us sending money to them as a bribe.  Think we've done outsourcing of our manufacturing base already?  You haven't seen ANYTHING yet!

I have asked her office to see if someone from her office would come onto the show tomorrow morning to discuss the why's.

 

Neda: Angel of Freedom

Neda

Neda

I am so restless, I cannot cease thinking! It seems like the world we live in reveals to us incessantly, at certain moments or in certain circumstances, just how little we are and how vast the universe is. This world of ours is a very complex world. The world we live in is a world of many brutal voices. It is a world of heavy blows and delirious trances, but it is the only world that we know.

Like millions of people around the world, the tragic death of Neda has affected me tremendously. I felt a temptation to scream and run to the end of the world and say my prayers with unusual earnestness and a heavy heart. I felt like screaming for the overflowing flood of human blood. I felt like screaming for the weary eyes and innocent moans of the victims of Iranian revolution. I felt apprehensive, anxious, and fearful. And now, as I take up my pen, my hand trembles and my head swims with horror and disbelief at the magnitude of the human devastation.

What’s in a name? Sometimes a name seems void of any meaning and sometimes a name embodies profound meaning, mysterious and even prophetic. Your name, our beloved Neda, the martyr daughter of Iran, literally means Divine Call, or Divine Summons, in Persian.

Dear Neda, when on the blessed day of your birth your parents hugged you joyously and named you Neda, they could hardly envision that you would be slaughtered in the prime of your life by a bullet of savage Islamists as you peacefully marched along with throngs of other Iranians seeking nothing more than what is your God-given right—the right to liberty and dignity.

Dear Neda, on the dreadful day that the bullet of a henchman of tyranny pierced your young heart, you collapsed on the pavement, gasped for air as your crimson blood painted the black asphalt. Your father tried desperately to revive you. He kept frantically telling you not to be afraid, not to be afraid. He was witnessing the death of his little girl and all he could do was to breathe encouragement in a vain hope of keeping you alive.

Our great Zoroaster, the luminous ancient prophet of Persia, spoke of the ongoing battle between the forces of good under Ahuramazda—God, and the forces of evil directed by Ahriman— Satan. Zoroaster warned us not to fall for the enticements or be disheartened by the atrocities of the forces of Ahriman. He further informed us that evil can be recognized by the deeds of its people; people who would oppose the precepts of Ahuramazda. The turbaned murderers cloaked in the robe of religion are wolves in sheep’s attire. They are indeed the agents of death (Ahriman).

But you, dear Neda, are a champion of the work of Ahuramazda. You have been destined for a great mission that required you to wing away from the loving bosom of your family into the eternal embrace of Mother Iran.

Dear Neda—O, Divine Call—O, Divine Summons—we mourn your death, yet we honor your call and summons:

A call and summons to follow in your footsteps with iron resolve.

A call and summons for the complete emancipation of millions of women, as well as men, who are suffering under the yoke of Islamic savagery.

Dear Neda, the meaning and mystery of your name was revealed to us on the dreadful day of your slaughter. You are to shine forever as a beacon of hope and a source of inspiration to all who struggle for justice, equality, and liberty.

Dear Neda, your departure broke our hearts. Yet, by your untimely tragic death, you steeled our resolve to carry on with your mission.

Dear Neda, this is our covenant with you. We will never give up. We will pay any price and make any sacrifice to achieve the mission you have entrusted into our hands.

Dear Neda, as you have joined the rarefied ranks of the immortals, I am moved to share with you a poem composed in the honor of another young Iranian heroine by the name of Mona.

Oh, you earthly angels!
You immigrating birds,
Whose only adornment
Is a bed of white feathers!
The innocent children of Iran,
Are wearing your white glowing robe,
And have left the memories of life,
To others!  

I see the poor black swallows,
Flying over the ruins of our city!
I see overflowing pain,
Intertwined,
With the hearts of every human being on earth!

My heart stops palpitating!
My breath starts to dry up!
My faith simply fades away,
And my bed falls silent.

Fly, little angel! Fly!
The wake of your wings brings new breath to our people!

I just can't WAIT for the data breaches to hit the news - what ARE they thinking!

On the surface, it might sound like a good idea.  I immediately thought of Doug slaving over the required form for college aid for his offspring and thought "this could be helpful".

Then, 3 seconds went by and the cerebral cortex kicked in and caught up with the eyeballs - you have GOT to be kidding!  Do you really want the Feds to expose YOUR IRS data over the web? (and wiping my brow saying "Glad I don't have to look at it")

The Obama Adminsistration yesterday proposed simplification of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form, including allowing student applicants and their parents to directly retrieve relevant tax information from the IRS to help them complete the online FAFSA. "When you're online filling out the FAFSA, there'll be a button that says, 'Want to go get your IRS data?'" said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman.

Right - they do a great job at putting their forms and instruction booklets out on the Web.  Dandy!  Helpful stuff as one navigates the multitudinal and inordinate amount of stuff to just send money.

Can you think, however, that this WOULDN'T be some hacker's Christmas present?  This is as bad as putting your healthcare info into the hands of the Feds....oh wait....

As Glenn says: What Could Go Wrong?

So Obama hates the coal and electric industries, eh?

Bumped up from Nov 02 - just for a reminder. This is NOT about saving the planet - this is all about more Government control over a vast area of our lives, as energy is the foundation of a modern society. That said, the Waxman bill is fitting in with what Obama wants - to send YOUR electricty costs skyrocketing for an outcome that is meaningless in 100 years and gives China and India an open field to dominate us economically. Even the EU is cheating on their own version of this and Australia is about to turn down the chance to put their own necks into the gallows.

Well, the leak of what Obama really thinks, starting with "Joe the Plumber" and the redistribution of wealth just keeps on getting bigger and bigger.

Now, not only is he going to tax us, and the companies we work for, into oblivion.  Now, he is going to shut down both the coal and electric generation industries.

Transcript here of his San Francisco Chronicle interview of Jan 17, 2008:

 

Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there.

I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the  polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

Please remember, than when people like Obama talk about a "market", it is NEVER a free market - the only kind that works.  This is a Government mandated distortion of the energy industry.

 

And he will not just use this "market" for what was it's original purpose (anti-pollution, although I disagree with the basic premises for what is causing global warming.  Except now, it is starting to look like Global Cooling - and THAT will be MUCH more dangerous!).

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.

So, because Obama doesn't like that industry, he will use the force of government to put them out of business.

 That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster.

Note: coal is one of the areas of energy that the US IS self-sufficient - but it seems that Obama may really not want that!

And as I have said before - with politicians, it isn't about being environmentally friendly - it IS about changing our behavior to fit what they believe is better for us.

And, it is ALL about the revenue streams....and what they can do with it.

It's not the companies that are the greediest - it is the politicians.  At least we get something from the companies of some value....

What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.  It's just that it will bankrupt them.

So, once again, ideology trumps the economy and our energy needs.  Hey Pennsylvania and West Virginia - you wanna start losing jobs?

I guess this means that Obama won't have to wait for his useful idiots on the Left to get the Fairness Doctrine going to shut up us Right Wingers - no coal, no electricity for radio or computers.  

Problem is, it won't be just us....

(H/T: NewsBusters)

And this from Gateway Pundit:

Remember... Obama said he would raise power and fuel prices to change our bad habits and that it's going to hurt--
"It's not going to be painless."
Video HERE.

Friday Humor - Lions in the shade

All jobs have inherent risks.  Fortunately, mine does not have this one!

 

You are a South African bush pilot working for Blue Sky Aviation.

You fly in some critical medical supplies, enjoy a quick lunch at the hospital.

It's a stifling 100 degrees in the shade and you're eager to get back aloft to the cooler upper atmosphere.

On the way back to your aircraft, you discover that the only bit of shade within 1 mile has become very popular.

You start estimating the distance to the aircraft door and wonder...

'Do I feel lucky today?'


The picture - after the jump:

Lions Under the plane wing

June 25, 2009

Notable Quotes - Founders admonishment against Debt

I wish our current "Country Fathers" would listen to our Founding Fathers.  Instead, as I have said before, they are acting more like teenagers that have learned to forge Dad's name on Dad's credit card.

And just like the teenagers, this current crop does NOT want to be anywhere around when the bill comes in - and mark my words, only the stupidist of the crop will try to ride it out:

"I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest dangers to be feared. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. If we run into such debts, we must be taxed in our meat and drink, in our necessities and in our comforts, in our labor and in our amusements. If we can prevent the government from wasting the labor of the people, under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy."

- Thomas Jefferson


"If you would know the value of money, go try to borrow some; for he that goes a-borrowing goes a-sorrowing."

- Benjamin Franklin

(H/T: Sine Nomine)

Waxman / Markey - the cost

Congressman Waxman (D-CA) has been pulling out all the stops in trying to get more Democrats to sign onto this monstrosity - now up to 1,200 pages. Shades of the Porkulus bill - which is pretty much what it is!  The Porkulus is going to tax us way beyond belief as the debt kicks in.  This bill is going to be a second KO  in the future as well!

Once again from Hot Air and once again, our Congress Critters are about to lay down a foundation by which they will control our energy usage (think behavior modification vs taxes).  And it is going to SLAM the middle class (as always, the rich can afford it and the poor will have it paid for by taxpayer money - poor middle class gets to pay for their neighbor's energy use; emphasis mine):

Democrats have hailed the CBO estimates of the costs per family of their new cap-and-trade carbon-emissions scheme, which show an impact of only $175 annually.  What they don’t tell voters, the Wall Street Journal explains, is that those costs begin to sharply escalate in ten years.  Democrats also fail to mention that the cost estimates of the CBO come just from the trading mechanism and nothing else:
To get support for his bill, Mr. Waxman was forced to water down the cap in early years to please rural Democrats, and then severely ratchet it up in later years to please liberal Democrats. The CBO’s analysis looks solely at the year 2020, before most of the tough restrictions kick in. As the cap is tightened and companies are stripped of initial opportunities to “offset” their emissions, the price of permits will skyrocket beyond the CBO estimate of $28 per ton of carbon. The corporate costs of buying these expensive permits will be passed to consumers.

The biggest doozy in the CBO analysis was its extraordinary decision to look only at the day-to-day costs of operating a trading program, rather than the wider consequences energy restriction would have on the economy. The CBO acknowledges this in a footnote: “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap.”

The hit to GDP is the real threat in this bill. The whole point of cap and trade is to hike the price of electricity and gas so that Americans will use less. These higher prices will show up not just in electricity bills or at the gas station but in every manufactured good, from food to cars. Consumers will cut back on spending, which in turn will cut back on production, which results in fewer jobs created or higher unemployment. Some companies will instead move their operations overseas, with the same result.

When the Heritage Foundation did its analysis of Waxman-Markey, it broadly compared the economy with and without the carbon tax. Under this more comprehensive scenario, it found Waxman-Markey would cost the economy $161 billion in 2020, which is $1,870 for a family of four. As the bill’s restrictions kick in, that number rises to $6,800 for a family of four by 2035.

Yup we will all end up as wards of the state.  Free choice?  Self-determination?  No problem, Obama and the Dems have your choices all mapped out fer ya!  Silly little people, thinking they elected people that would watch out for them.  This is all about Statism - Government being in control and not the individuals.  This is all about bigger and bigger Government. 

You don't like this?  Consider this as an action item:

NoWaxman-Markey will get a vote, perhaps as early as tomorrow, in the House.  Call your Congressman and explain that we don’t want to throw away our economic future for the pleasure of a few statists exploiting an unproven theory as a means to gain control of energy production.  This fight, though, will be won or lost in the Senate.

Healthcare - Who should make the tradeoff? Consider Obama's new "Joe The Plumber Moment"!

I previously posted about whether or not  Healthcare is a right - again, the money clause was:

Simply defined, a right is something that an individual can exercise (as a sovereign individual) without asking anyone’s permission. It also carries the complementary notion that in exercising that right an individual cannot obligate anyone else to participate because to obligate others to act violates their own freedom of action (summarily eliminating their freedom to refuse to act, for instance).

Here's another way to look at it:

Life is trade offs. The big question is who should decide? As you read the Constitution does the federal government have the right to make all decisions regarding what medicine you can use, particularly in a life-threatening situation? Putting aside the question of Constitutionality, *should* the federal government have that right? Or do you agree that most decisions should be left to the states and the people?

- NH Resident, Spec Bowers

Indeed!  President Obama is making all kinds of proclamations, along with his Democrat flunkies, as though it is a done deal that he has the right and the authority to use the power of Government to force a free people into situations in which they will have no choices.  Mark my words, once Government uses the fiscal power of our own taxes, the Government Option / Public Option / Public Co-op or any other term will end up being dependent on our taxes and we will be dependent on Government for any of our healthcare...

Which is exactly what Obama wants.

If you remember, his "Joe the Plumber" moment was when candidate Obama went up to Joe and started a conversation and told Joe that he wanted to "Spread the wealth" and was annoyed at Joe's response.  He repeated that performance last night - a TRUE indication of Progressive Elitism - "we will determine what you can do, but we will do different."  From Hot Air, we get the conversation from ABC's (All Barack Channel) Obama health Infomercial: - the Joe the Plumber  moment!

President Obama struggled to explain today whether his health care reform proposals would force normal Americans to make sacrifices that wealthier, more powerful people — like the president himself — wouldn’t face.

...

Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a neurologist and researcher at the New York University Langone Medical Center, said that elites often propose health care solutions that limit options for the general public, secure in the knowledge that if they or their loves ones get sick, they will be able to afford the best care available, even if it’s not provided by insurance.

Devinsky asked the president pointedly if he would be willing to promise that he wouldn’t seek such extraordinary help for his wife or daughters if they became sick and the public plan he’s proposing limited the tests or treatment they can get.

The president refused to make such a pledge, though he allowed that if “it’s my family member, if it’s my wife, if it’s my children, if it’s my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care.["]

And what person WOULDN'T want the best for his or her family!  Parse the words - he got trapped by his own policy:

He has just admitted his plan is not one he would want for himself or his family.

Do you need any more information than that?  If the President, willing to spend Trillions of dollars for this boon-doggle, is not willing to place his family on this plan, why should you and I?

Congress will be exempt from this.  So will unions.  How come Obama wants to shackle us with this?

GO AHEAD - call your Congress Critters and see what their answer is to this:

Senator/Congressman - will you move your family to Obamacare?

It is not a Rocket Scientist question - it is either yes or no.  After all, by pitching Government against the private market, we all will end up on it, as there is NO way that the private market can compete against the "Public Option"; it can make its plan cheaper based on OUR tax money.

If they say no, remember to say no to them in November if they vote for this bill.  After all, if it is not good enough for them, why is it good enough for you?

Doing the job the major media won't do... Tea Party 2.0 is now "in the can."

Tea Party

Chances are, if you get all of your news from NewsNine WMUR TV, you wouldn't know that there was a sizeable and noisy anti-spending rally taking place on the front steps of the State House in Concord as lawmakers from both Houses considered a new state budget for New Hampshire.

Low Taxes are the result of low spending

Featuring a roster of speakers hitting a common theme that government at all levels is spending too much instead of tightening their belts, the call for LOWER taxes, not higher ones, was the order of the day. As House members and Senators sat within the building and passed a budget laden with new taxes and fees, a crowd that grew to nearly 300 people shouted and waved handmade signs expressing their scorn and derision outside.

Tea Party

Gov John Lynch

This video captures some of the louder moments, and clearly shows the size and energy of the crowd that gathered despite the rain and dampness. Sadly, it meant no nevermind to the Democratic-led legislature, as they went on to approve the budget which now heads off to the Governor who is expected to sign it. The gathered Tea Partiers vowed that those politicians that acted so irresponsibly with our money will pay come 2010...

 

 

 

This is what happend to the auto dealerships - is your Doctor next?

Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) is certainly getting a reputation for "no holds barred, no prisoners taken" in defending traditional American values - free markets, individual liberties.  As I watched this short vid, even though it is about Democrat "crony capitalism" in which it is more important to know the right "political Democrat" to be a success in business than it is to just be business successful, the thought kept running through my head (especially reading about the All Barack Commercial last nite) was:

I'm wondering if my Doctor is going to be treated the same way.

The precedent has now been set by an overreaching Obama supported by anti-free market Democrats. Substitute healthcare for cars as you watch the vid:


June 24, 2009

Can we say that Waxman/Markey is racist?

According to this study, blacks aren't all that with it concerning Cap and Trade.  It seems that the rush to vote on this 1,200 page bill (why are all of the anti-freedom bills ALL this size??) is because the longer they get looked at, the more they smell....and they want to vote on this by Friday!

Go call your Congress Critters!

Blacks vs. Cap and Trade   [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

A new study from the the National Center for Public Policy Research "shows an overwhelming majority of African Americans are opposed to the [cap-and-trade] bill based on the potential impact on the economy and minority households."

Key findings include:

* 76 percent of African American adults believe that securing America’s economic recovery should be the top priority, even if it means delaying action in climate change.

* 56 percent of African American adults think our federal and state policy makers fail to adequately take into account economic and quality of life concerns when considering new anti-global warming laws.

* When asked if the federal action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could increase unemployment, 38 percent of survey respondents said they felt African Americans would proportionately lose more jobs while 49 percent felt that federal action to reduce greenhouse gas emission would hit all races equally.

* Only 15 percent of survey respondents said they would be willing to pay one dollar more for gasoline due to greenhouse gas legislation. The numbers dropped to 5, 3, and 4 percent if gas prices increased by two, three or four dollars a gallon. 

* Only 11 percent of survey respondents said they would be willing to pay one hundred dollars more a year for electricity in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The numbers dropped to 6, 4 and 1 percent when respondents were asked if they would be willing to pay an extra two hundred, three hundred, or six hundred dollars a year for electricity.

* More than one out of every three African American adults surveyed said that greenhouse gas emissions should not be reduced if doing so would cause price increases and unemployment.

(H/T: NRO)

Remember, we are about to be taxed TRILLIONS!  And you know what all that will get us?  Just about a 0.18 degree C less warmer temperature than if we did nothing.  Our "masters" in Congress are about to put the Big Hurt on the American Economy...and India and China will just laugh as these Congressmen, greedy with a lust for power to control what used to be a free people, enslave their own.  They will pollute regardless, and produce at a lower cost.

You think unemployment is high now?

One person's idea on how to straighten things out

I have not been posting much lately - have been trying to review some really old code FoxPro code for a friend.  However, this caught my eye - it seems that these are straight forward and common-sensical outlook.  Let me know what you think.  From The Futurist (shortened up by me) :

I hereby present a path to unprecedented prosperity for America :

1) Immigration Reform: ...highly skilled immigrants who seek to follow the law are put through an excruciating process lasting 7-12 years, fraught with restrictions on the changing of employers and the spouse's right to work.  At the same time, unskilled immigrants, many with criminal tendencies, have an incentive to enter the US illegally and consume services paid for by the US taxpayer.  ...the next Andy Grove, Vinod Khosla, Elon Musk, Pierre Omidyar, and Sergey Brin are faced with a tortuous, interminable ordeal that may lead them to conclude that coming to America is not as worthwhile as it was a generation ago.

He's right - most educated folks want to do things "the right way" - but the special interests and the Lefty Progressives reward bad behavior...go figure!

2) Tax Simplification: My detailed case for tax simplification can be found here.  In summary: ...Before even discussing the reduction or increase in tax rates, there should first be a reduction in tax complexity.  If a family earning $100K is currently required to pay $20K in income taxes to the Federal Government, so be it.  But at least let the process of calculating this tax payment take 20 minutes instead of 20 hours. 

Oh Lordy - how I wish this could be - for tax simplification WOULD mean less capacity for social engineering.  Do you think Barney Frank or Obama would agree to this in ACTION (they can say whatever they want - I want action!).

3) Tax Exemption for Entrepreneurial Innovators: The reason that innovation prizes like the X-Prize are so valuable is that they evoke superlative efforts out of their contestants.  This is entirely the opposite of most charities, which merely give ambition-dampening handouts to those deemed to be needy.  By some measures, a $10 million X-Prize creates $500 million or more of innovation value...However, after one team out of dozens of competitors wins a particular X-Prize of $10 Million or so, they have to turn around and pay 45% of it in income taxes.  So the real prize is just $5.5 Million.  If the IRS were to exempt these innovation prizes from taxation, the cost to the US government would be tiny, relative to the value of innovation that the now-larger prize would inspire

Agree!  You make something neat, you make jobs, you get a free ride!  After all, you have "given back" in the form of jobs and the taxes they will pay.  At the highest levels, this would be quite the incentive to try a repeat, three-peat, and keep on going!

4) Make Sarbanes-Oxley Voluntary: The 'SarbOx' compliance requirements make it far more tedious for a young company to go public.  For a small public company, SarbOx compliance may cost $3 million per year in auditing and legal fees, which could otherwise be spent on research and development. 

SOX has been a deal breaker and a job buster.  and it has not done much but give pain....agree.

5) Reform Divorce Laws: ...we currently have divorce laws in America that provide perverse incentives for women to leave marriages that traditionally would have been considered acceptable, and consequently for the next generation of men to not enter marriage in the first place.  Thus, the percentage of adults in stable marriages continues to shrink.  Incentives matter, and the present incentive structure has disastrous long-term implications.

And MY favorite!

6) Make Tax Day One Day Before Election Day: The fact that April 15 and the first Tuesday in November are as far apart from each other as they are has itself cost the American taxpayer trillions of dollars, only due to human psychology.  If, however, elections were held precisely when the taxpayer is most irate with the wastage of taxpayer funds, fiscal conservatism will immediately become the highest priority of any political candidate. 

(H/T: Instapundit)

Scenes from today's Concord Tea Party

Tea Party

While the big spenders in Concord may have passed the budget today, they did so while listening to the loud boos and jeers from a crowd of 200+ attending today's "It's the Spending, Stupid!" Tea Party rally in front of the Statehouse. With the windows of the building open, reports were that the crowd could be heard quite clearly expressing their displeasure with what was going on inside. Here are a few pics of what was an enthusiastic crowd, for sure, despite downright lousy weather. It may have been wet and damp, but, it did not curb the level of energy and anger directed at state lawmakers as they put the finishing touches on a new budget long on spending and short on cuts...

Tea Party

Not much of this going on in the new budget...

Tea Party

 

Tea Party

Tea Party

Tea Party

Tea Party

Stay tuned for more pics and video a little later...

 

"Silent Majority No More" anti-propaganda rally at WMUR tonight at 9 PM!

propaganda

This evening, ABC will be airing an “infomercial” for Obama to sell us his Nationalized Health Care Plan. They have billed this as a “Conversation on Healthcare” and yet they are not allowing the other side of the “conversation” to be heard. Just like the Russian Government run news organization TASS, ABC is becoming a state run news organization for our new socialist government and they are not allowing any alternate points of view to be aired in juxtaposition to their broadcast.

There are two problems with this “infomercial.” The first problem has already been mentioned, where our first Amendment rights are being encroached upon by the creation of a quasi-state-run media (would it be of any surprise to anyone if Obama is on the verge of appointing a media Czar in the near future). The second, and more immediate concern is the shameless promotion of a National Health Care Program in an infomercial format without any objective reporting on the issue, or the ability to show any kind of alternate program or point of view.

Once again, the government is setting things up to try to ram things down our throat that We The People do not want and cannot afford for us or for our children. We MUST stand up and be heard!

We cannot stand idly by and see our media hijacked and become a state-run media outlet orchestrated by Obama’s administration, nor can we simply let this National Health Care Initiative be foisted upon us without putting up any resistance. It’s time for us to act. The last time we mobilized, the media tried to ignore and marginalize us. We will not be ignored!

Every able bodied freedom loving American is invited to rally outside of their local ABC affiliate TV station with signs, airhorns, and other noisemaking devices so that we get their attention this time. The slogan “Silent Majority No More” can no longer remain just a slogan, it’s time to show that we are NOT silent anymore. Make it sound like midnight on New Years Eve in front of every ABC affiliate TV station across the country. Make them send their reporters out to cover it live. Continue the rally through their news hour so our fellow Americans can realize how many of us share the same view. We know that this keeps you up a little later than usual however, a little sleep lost now is better than liberties lost later. Unusual times call for unusual measures.

Our ABC affiliate is WMUR-TV right here in Manchester, NH.

Time: 9:00 PM (broadcast starts at 10:00)
Place: WMUR-TV Broadcast Center
100 South Commercial Street
Manchester, NH 03101

 

The time is at hand. NH Tea Party 2.0~ Tell them: It's the spending, stupid! 12 Noon today. BE THERE!

 

NH Tea Party

GOP members of the NH House ready budget cuts

not going to listen

Dems taking GOP input?

At a press conference held yesterday, Minority Leader Sherm Packard, along with a large group of fellow NH House Republicans, released the following document outlining a proposed series of budget cuts totalling $181.9 million that they will introduce should the budget fail to pass today.

“House Republicans Offer Cost-Saving Budget Alternatives”

Concord-House Republican Leader Sherm Packard (Londonderry) stood with HB 1 & HB 2 Republican House Conferees today to discuss the impending budget vote and to propose  several alternatives.

“Representatives Kurk and Scamman offered several spending reductions in the conference committee budget, some were accepted and most were ignored,” stated Packard.  “The fact of the matter is that budgets across the country have seen an average 2% decrease in their state spending and the Democrat majority in Concord has increased state spending by an unconscionable 7.7%.”

“Republicans were not fully involved in this budget process and while a suggestion or two may have been accepted, there are no significant and meaningful cuts in state spending which would defer the need for the additional taxes and fees that Democrats added in the last hours of conference,” added Republican Conferee Representative Neal Kurk (Weare).

No less than a dozen fees were increased, in some cases doubled, with the implementation of several tax plans including tightening belts for LLCs, increasing the Rooms & Meals tax, increasing the tobacco tax for the fourth time in five years and adding a new tax on gambling winnings.

“I am disappointed by these tax and fee increases,” said Republican Conferee Alternate, Rep. Doug Scamman (Stratham).  “We hurt businesses and we hurt the cities and towns of our state.  This is not the New Hampshire way.”

Republicans will be offering a continuing resolution to keep state government going at a fiscally responsible level, should the massive spending and taxing increases contained in House Bills 1 & 2 fail to pass the House in session on June 24 and call on all their colleagues to support this plan. 

 Here are the specific proposed cuts:

 

 

Specific General Fund Appropriation Reductions

 

                                                                                                      

Biennial Savings

 

 

Accept House position on retirement (Group I 5-7%, Group II 9-11%)            $21 M

 

OADAP reduced to Governor’s level                                                         $2 M

 

USNH required to pay their own debt service                                              $39 M

 

Reduce House out-of state travel expenses to 05-06 levels                              $170 K

 

Reduce Legislative Organizational Dues to $100K per year                             $230 K

 

Eliminate LCHIP funding                                                                         $4.5 M

 

Roll-back the 5.5% state employee raise from 1/1/09                                     $15 M

(This suggestion was adopted in part in the budget in the amount of $25 M)

 

General fund 7% across-the-board-cuts (excluding debt service, direct care & safety services (corrections officers, etc.))                                                                                                       $100 M   

 

Specific Cuts offered by House Republicans              $181.9 M

June 23, 2009

Taush's STEWARD: From mail to radio to TV.

Air Force One over NYCright to knowSteward of Prosperity

Leaving no media aside, Fred Tausch's STEWARD of Prosperity fiscal restraint message machine now hits the TV airwaves. If there was anybody left in the state of New Hampshire that HASN'T heard the anti-stimulus, anti-spending, pro-transparency, anti-Obamanomic perspective being delivered with the cold hard economic facts and reasoning combined with a somewhat biting sense of witty sarcasm, a new TV ad set to hit the Granite State starting tomorrow will seek to change that.

Building on a series of mail pieces and a recent flood of radio ads [Full disclosure: STEWARD has purchased ad space here on the 'Grok and on MTNP radio], Nashua businessman Fred Tausch, through his grassroots organization, STEWARD of Prosperity, as reported on WMUR TV, will air an ad entitled Taxpayers First. Here is the WMUR report:

 

And this is the ad itself that will be broadcast:

 

I know that the mmessage is getting out there, as I have been running into people here and there that ask me, "Hey Doug, what do you think of that Steward guy... what's his name, Fred Tausch, or something?" And then they usually tell me how much they agree with what he's been saying...

 

Guest Letter to the Editor on NH's budget

The following is a Letter to the Editor from a gentleman that I admire a lot for his writings and thoughts here in NH, Paul Mirski - a warning that the increasing meddlesome nature of NH government by the ruling Democrats is having a material affect on the State's economy (and future - emphasis mine):

Dear Editor,

In the June 18 edition of New Hampshire Business Review, Jim Roche, President of the Business and Industry Association of New Hampshire, warned that "recent (legislative) policy decisions (in Concord) are resulting in growing unease among business people."  

Too late.  The horse is already out of the barn.

New Hampshire, which ranked # 20 nationally for economic potential before our legislative tilt to the left in 2006, now ranks 37th - a loss of seventeen positions among the states.

New Hampshire which ranked #1 among the New England states and including New York and New Jersey, for growth and opportunity before Democrats took control of the levers of state government, has now fallen to third in New England and the greater region, behind Massachusetts and Connecticut, as a place to consider locating a business and as a place to create jobs.

After the NH House's embrace of capital gains and death taxes this legislative session, individuals of wealth are now openly considering establishing a formal domicile elsewhere, in more accommodating places like Wyoming and Texas for example, because they're convinced that no matter what Governor Lynch says and no matter the degree to which current legislative leaders demur, an income tax is surely around the corner.

Businessmen and entrepreneurs are experiencing similar fears.

By frivolously growing state government, increasing regulation and by imposing whopping increases in spending, taxes and fees, our last and current legislatures have convinced many residents, businesses and entrepreneurs that it’s time to leave and for the first time in decades New Hampshire has begun to lose population.

In just three short years, Democrats in control of New Hampshire government have irresponsibly informed the entire country that New Hampshire is no longer either a tax haven or a friendly place to do business.

New Hampshire was once considered to be the best place in the country to live.

It takes a long time to recover a lost reputation.

Unless political control of the legislature and corner office changes dramatically in the next election, ever increasing decline and lost opportunity will become NH hallmarks for decades to come.
Paul mentioned "whopping increases in spending, taxes and fees"; in the last 3 budget cycles, we now have a 23% higher budget.  Ask yourself:
  • Did your family income rise as much as the Democrats have raised the State's
  • Do you really think this is good for the State's economy going forward?

I thought so...

Huh? They actually make stuff like this?

Living in a rural area where MOST people tend to behave themselves has some serious advantages.  That said, it deprives us of "some" stuff that may be a more common sight to our more "urban" folks - like this:

police thingamajiggy

Shhh...let's just keep this a secret between us - let's not give the local constabulary any ideas, shall we? Especially if there is more of that ARRA $$ laying around (can you say legal "conspicuous consumption"?)

(H/T: Instapundit)

Franklin City Council takes first step towards Tax Cap override!

empty wallet

GraniteGrok has learned that a "sense of the council" resolution-- a test vote on the budget-- taken during last night's Franklin City Council meeting that would bring new taxes in excess of what that city's Tax Cap would allow, has passed.

According to a message posted on Facebook by Franklin Mayor Ken Merrifield, the council overrode the Tax Cap, overrode the Mayor's veto, and approved $563,449 in increased taxes and fees. This is the first time in 20 years that the Tax Cap has been broken.

This is not, however, the final word. Members of the public and taxpayers will still have a chance to be heard during the required Public Hearing, which has not yet been set. The budget cannot become final until after that takes place.

Said Mayor Merrifield on the bad news for taxpayers:

"I've done everything I could."

Sounds like it's Tea Time for Franklin. We'll keep an eye out for that Public Hearing. I cannot believe that politicians would dare do this during the down economy, or, for that matter, anytime, really. Don't they get it? The people WANT their taxes capped!

 

GraniteGrok US Senate Poll: Who should Republicans put up for the seat in 2010?

 

ballot box

 

With the announcement that NH Attorney General Kelly Ayotte was to be the featured speaker at an upcoming GOP event before backing out, it appears she is at least taking the first initial steps to a possible run for NH's US Senate seat being vacated by Judd Gregg. This further raises expectations that were first hinted at last week. With Paul Hodes taking a swipe at Nashua businessman Fred Tausch (Steward of Prosperity) in a recent fund-raising letter (reacting to THIS mail piece), given that the former is definitely --and the latter is rumored to be-- a candidate, one cannot deny that the position jockeying has begun.

Drew Cline, apparently having sat down with Tausch recently, Twittered:

“Just spent an hour with the mysterious Fred Tausch, founder of STEWARD. First impression: This guy is for real.”

Paul Briand, writing in the Manchester Examiner writes, on Ayotte:

 the candidacy has a certain amount of curb appeal for the centrists in both parties. She was appointed to her post by former Republican Gov. Craig Benson and was reappointed by current Democratic Gov. John Lynch.

She is the type of Republican that Colin Powell says the GOP desperately needs -- moderate, not strident in the mode of Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney ... and the Sununus.

Regarding another name being bandied about as "not ruling out" a Senate run, in 2006, Republican analyst Liz Mair wrote about Charlie Bass' performance as NH's District 2 Congressman, noting he was

a key moderate, with a strong record of supporting the war in Iraq, pursuing tax cuts benefiting the middle class and small businesses, and working to protect New Hampshire's environment.

Let's not forget that should John E. Sununu decide to take another crack at a Senate seat, he would be hard to beat in a primary, given his popularity is still high among Republicans. Also, other names I've heard bandied about are BAE Systems' Rich Ashooh, who is active in numerous groups and boards across the state, and former Governor Steve Merrill.

OK GraniteGrok readers, what do YOU think? Can any of these guys and gal cut the mustard in a general campaign against the likely Dem nominee Paul Hodes? Have I left somebody out? Feel free to vote "none of the above" and leave your choice in the comment section below.

 

Who do you support for the GOP nomination to NH's US Senate seat in 2010?
Rich Ashooh
Kelly Ayotte
Charlie Bass
Steve Merrill
John E. Sununu
Fred Tausch
None of the Above (leave comment)
  
pollcode.com free polls

 


 

 

 

OK, a Friday Humor a tad early - Blonde Antelope

I may have seen this before - doesn't matter - it's funny!


(H/T: Karen)

June 22, 2009

When seconds count, the protectors will be there in minutes...

gun

As I've noted before, when pondering instances of tragic school campus slaughter, or any mass shooting incident for that matter, I always come up with the same conclusion: The only defense against some random nut crashing into a classroom or other place with guns blazing is to have somebody in the room packing heat and trained to shoot back. Sure, there still may be some initial injuries or even death, but the number might be kept to a minimum if potential victims turned the tables on such an attacker. After all-- what is a "gun free zone" to an attacker but an easy target?

Some news from Michigan shows that at least one college is taking a step, albeit a small one, in the direction that makes sense. From WSBT News, via the NRA on Facebook:

Michigan State University has approved an exception to its campus weapons ban allowing people with permits to carry concealed weapons to walk or drive through campus with a gun.

This is certainly welcome news, and we hope that this is the start of a trend that will ultimately spread across the Nation. My children, both of whom will sit in college classrooms this year, as it stands right now, remain basically defenseless is the face of rampage event. After all, if would-be murderous crazies knew they faced a high possibility of being greeted with return fire, they might think twice before attempting their twisted acts in the first place, thus actually REDUCING gun violence by the addition of MORE guns.

Sadly, that isn't fully the case in Michigan, despite the decision. WSBT News further reports:

Guns still are banned inside campus buildings and sports stadiums.

THAT needs to change next...

 


EXCLUSIVE: Ayotte removes herself from keynote speaker role at GOP event

Kelly Ayotte

GraniteGrok has learned from GOP sources that NH's Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, rumored to be considering a run for the Republican nomination for the US Senate, has pulled herself from the keynote speaker role at the Winnipesaukee GOP's annual Fourth of July breakfast.

This comes on the heels of several reports earlier in the day heralding the recently reappointed Republican's scheduled appearance at the event.

Veteran observers have taken note of this apparent disarray within the budding campaign, it obviously not being the way her supporters had hoped to begin a possible race. Against the backdrop of a potential field of talented and well-funded opponents, time will tell if this early snafu has any chance of inflicting permanent damage.

DEVELOPING...

"New Taxes Galore"

house of cards

Balanced Budget... Or House of Cards?

Guest post by State Senator Jeb Bradley

After two marathon weeks of discussions between House and Senate members charged with negotiating a budget, early Friday morning a package emerged.  Its fate is uncertain as the full House and Senate must pass it before it reaches Governor Lynch for signature. Counting votes before the June 24th Session will be almost as daunting as reaching this compromise -- anything can and may well happen.

Let's first focus on what is in this package and what is not, then on the impact it will have on people and businesses, and lastly how this budget will affect New Hampshire’s future.

Like any compromise, this budget is a mixed bag of good news and bad news.  Several very controversial new taxes and tax hikes that had previously been approved by either the House or Senate, were dropped. These include the capital gains tax, death tax, gas tax, insurance premium tax, and a specific increase in business taxes by loss of a tax credit. All of these taxes would have directly undermined New Hampshire’s ability to attract businesses, investors, or visitors to our state. Also dropped from the final package were expanded gambling and a controversial plan to use toll revenue for highway improvements all over the state. Several taxes rumored for late consideration never made the final package including an entertainment tax and a tax on mortgage re-financing.

There are new taxes galore however.  The tobacco tax will go up by 45 cents -- the fourth hike in five years.  Non-smokers may generally be callous to the impact this tax has, but smokers, especially low income people, justifiably believe they are carrying far more than their fair share of the tax burden.  This increase will also undermine the cross border advantage New Hampshire has long enjoyed – attracting visitors to purchase tobacco products here and fill our revenue coffers. Convenience stores near the borders will be impacted, and meeting our revenue goals with this tax hike is questionable.

Any gambling winnings will be taxed at 10% including those garnered outside of New Hampshire. Will we be sending auditors to Foxwoods and Las Vegas -- or charitable events in New Hampshire -- to guarantee tax collection?  Under those circumstances, is the $14 million of anticipated revenue farfetched?

 

The Rooms and Meals tax got increased 12.5%. I have written before that this huge increase will make our states less competitive for tours, vacations, conventions, and weddings. But budget writers slapped this tax for the first time on campgrounds – without a public hearing. Campground owners are outraged at this abuse of process. One owner felt so betrayed by the Legislature not having a public hearing, he told me the only people qualified to serve in the Statehouse are the janitors.  Campers arriving this summer may be just as angry when they discover this new "marshmallow tax". Again, revenue projections may suffer if campers take their marshmallows elsewhere.

Business owners were certainly dinged too.  Business owners already are subject to an 8.5% tax on profits as well as a .75% tax on all payroll expenses.  Now however, business owners organized as limited liability companies or as partnerships will be subject to an additional 5% tax on any income distributed to an owner. This significant change in the 1923 Interest and Dividends tax was also snuck in at the last minute – again with no public hearing. The estimate is that this change will raise $30 million of new taxes from business over the next two years.  This dramatic increase in taxes on small business may prove to the biggest $30 million mistake that New Hampshire could make -- as it threatens to undermine New Hampshire’s ability to build new jobs at exactly the wrong time.

The ‘rest of the story’ behind this last minute business tax increase is that it is just the latest step by the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration to strangle small business in New Hampshire.  Desperate to raise revenue, DRA has recently taken it upon itself to essentially determine how much compensation a business owner may pay him or herself.  Should the business owner pay him or herself additional compensation beyond what DRA has pre-determined is allowed, the DRA with bureaucratic hubris will simply assesses the 8.5% Business Profits Tax on this so called excess compensation.

If people are concerned about the Administration in Washington determining pay levels for executives – well it has been happening here in New Hampshire – right under our noses – with questionable legal authority for DRA to determine what is profit and what is income for a business owner.

This attack against successful small business owners, hidden from the light of day behind the audit curtain, is by itself a terrible threat to New Hampshire’s ability to build new jobs here.  But now under this budget it gets worse.  The business owner will pay a new 5% tax on income on top of the 8.5% tax on the balance of income that DRA has determined is excessive. The Legislature may say it wants to attract business to New Hampshire, but in fact, the Legislature is sending business a strong signal: move to Massachusetts. When tax policy in Massachusetts is more attractive than ours—that is dangerous!  The pink slips will follow for NH workers.

It is not just taxes – fees are going up dramatically. Drivers will pay at least $30 to $75 more for registering a car. Boat registration fees double.  Condominium registrations will nearly double. There is even a new salt water fishing license fee and a permit to carry a concealed weapon for out of staters skyrockets from $20 to $100 which means people will no longer register firearms in NH and we will likely lose money.

What about property taxes? This budget spreads the pain to them as well as property taxes will climb across New Hampshire by nearly $90 million as this budget downshifts traditional state responsibilities onto the backs of already struggling property owners.

With all these new taxes, higher fees, and soaring property taxes – what happened to spending levels?  I have maintained throughout this budget process that spending needs to be reduced to avoid raising taxes on families, small business, and property owners struggling to stay afloat.  While this budget did make some last minute cuts to programs and personnel – it was still not enough in my view. Overall spending will still increase 10.5%.

Governor Lynch warned that projected revenue is going to fall to 2004 levels and will be 10% lower than 2008 levels.  Business tax revenues alone are currently some 27% below the projections for expected revenue.

But budget writers were still short and desperate for revenue. So despite the Governor’s warning, budget writers magically inflated revenue expectations by $75 million in order to sustain spending.  Lastly, $90 million of traditional state expenditures to reimburse school districts for construction projects was moved from the operating budget to the capital budget – meaning this $90 million will be borrowed! Experts have warned that borrowing of this magnitude is unsustainable.

So what does all this mean?  Economically strapped New Hampshire residents will have to dig deeper into wallets filled with fumes rather than cash. The business climate will suffer significantly at a time that nearly 50,000 New Hampshire people are out of work and that New Hampshire’s unemployment picture has also darkened relative to other states.

But what has gone under the radar is this budget’s impact on future budgets.  Not enough people realize that about $500 million of spending in this budget depends directly upon one time sources of revenue: federal stimulus funding, increased federal Medicaid funding, and a $110 million raid of New Hampshire doctor’s medical liability funds. (Litigation filed against this raid as well as the $75 million magical revenue projections are likely to leave this budget with a gaping deficit.)  Can New Hampshire realistically expect future federal largess as Congress stares straight into the white eyes of indefinite trillion dollar federal deficits.

This $500 million one-time spending crater is a ticking time bomb for the next budget. Will the re-financing tax, the entertainment tax, the gas tax, the capital gains tax, the death tax rise from the dead? Will existing taxes on business, hospitality, tobacco, interest and dividends, real estate sales, and communications continue on their relentless climb? Will the state dump more costs onto property taxpayers? Or will it be a sales tax or an income tax---how about both?

That is the bleak future for New Hampshire families, businesses, and property owners unless state spending, which will have grown by nearly 24% in three budget cycles, is not brought under control.


 

Wednesday June 24. The BIG day for NH. IT'S THE SPENDING, STUPID!!!!

Our friends at CPR Action remind us that this week is an important one down in Concord. After all the lengthy debate and careful consideration, arm twisting and deal making... oh, wait, that's the gay marriage process. Never mind. The big news is that this week the NH House and Senate will make final votes on a new budget. Sadly, they seemed to have put more effort into passing the gay agenda than in seeking ways to tighten the belt in these times of economic stress...

 

Wednesday, June 24th (June 25th has also been reserved if a majority vote is not met).


HB1 & HB2 - The budget bills.  This week, the NH House and Senate will be voting on the final versions of the budget bills.  HB1, the spending portion, still increases overall spending by nearly 11%.  HB2, while not containing any of the "boogey man" taxes and gambling, still increases the rooms and meals tax to 9%, doubles the car registration fee, and inflates revenue estimates so that overall revenue "balances" with the spending.

CPR-Action encourages you to call your legislators to remind them that voting for any budget that increases spending by 11% is unwise and fiscally irresponsible!  Why, when most families are cutting their spending, is the legislature increasing their spending of taxpayer dollars by 11%!

And of course, don't forget the Tea Party conveniently taking place on the State House lawn about the same time legislators take up the massive spending bill...

'It's the Spending, Stupid!'  Rally

June 24th, 12 noon - 1pm

RAIN OR SHINE!!

Don't miss your chance to let our legislators and the Governor know that you do not approve of their reckless, out-of-control spending - it's time to budget like our families do!

NH Tea Party

 

June 21, 2009

Today, everyone is an Iranian

Iran Riots

 

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy

Today, all Iranian expatriates are united in solidarity with the Iranian people in Iran. Today, we are all standing tall to let the world hear our continuous aspiration for a free and democratic Iran. Today, we pledge ourselves, under the divine inspiration, to stand beside the Iranians in Iran and echo their voices around the globe. Today, we make history, yet again.

It is critical that freedom-loving people, governments and media, rally behind the Iranian people and end the tyrannical mullahcracy that is a scourge on Iran as well as the world. The Iranian people themselves are fully capable and are determined to remove the cancer of Islamism from their country. The United States and Israel and other democracies have a huge stake in the success of the Iranian people to rid themselves of the Islamic oppression and tyranny.

The situation in Iran is dire indeed. Anyone who believes that sane rational people on both sides are engaged in brinkmanship to secure the best advantage, but would eventually work out a compromise, is deluding himself. In some cases, time works as a healer and even as a solution of thorny problems. Yet, this problem will not go away, and time would only make the cataclysmic clash more likely and deadly. The best chance for resolving the impasse is regime change in Iran.

For the past thirty years, the intrepid Iranians have been paying with their blood for liberty, independence and human dignity while the world looked the other way and did business with the Islamist rulers in Iran. Thirty years ago, a fanatic Shi'a Muslim by the name of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, with the assistance of western governments (with Jimmy Carter on top of the list), succeeded in overthrowing the Shah of Iran during Iran's 1979 revolution.

Khomeini promised Iranians heaven, but he created hell on earth, turning Iran into a bastion of Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism. Ever since, tens of thousands of political activists have been killed or imprisoned. Tens of thousands of opposition groups, women, ethnic and religious minorities, have been subjected to inhumane treatment and tens of thousands of political prisoners are spending their precious lives, in the medieval barbaric Islamic Republic dungeons.
Since 1979, this illegitimate government of the Islamic Republic has been waging a brutal war against the entire population of Iran who has been fighting for individual and religious freedom. In spite of tens of thousands of political executions, other brutal practices and years of a reign of terror, the Islamists have not succeeded in uprooting the nationwide movement for democracy in Iran.

 
We honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for proclaiming from a Birmingham jail, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." To demand justice for others, he risked his life, left his native Georgia, and ended up in jail in the-then-bigoted south, Birmingham, Alabama. We "Iranians" must do no less. We must demand justice for our compatriots who are suffering under the yoke of Islamofascism in Iran.

We also do well to recall the example of an Irish-American President-John F. Kennedy-looking at the Communists' Wall of Shame in Berlin, proclaiming, "Ich bin ein Berliner"-"I am a Berliner." By so claiming, he helped rally free people of the world that brought down the wall and created a momentum that eventually swept the totalitarian Communist wall-builders into the dustbin of history.

Another great American President, Ronald Reagan, took a stand on freedom with the Polish people.

 
"The Polish nation, speaking through Solidarity, has provided one of the brightest, bravest moments of modern history. The people of Poland are giving us an imperishable example of courage and devotion to the values of freedom in the face of relentless opposition. Left to themselves, the Polish people would enjoy a new birth of freedom. But there are those who oppose the idea of freedom, who are intolerant of national independence, and hostile to the European values of democracy and the rule of law."

 
History records that Reagan's decision to take a strong stand for Polish freedom -- and bringing down the Communist system itself -- was the right one." Reagan led and inspired the Poles to continue the struggle which resulted in half of Europe being freed from iron-fisted domination, by then, the Soviet Union.

Even the European Union called on Islamic authorities to investigate allegations of vote-rigging during Iran's presidential election on Friday, expressing concern at Tehran's crackdown on protesters. Germany's Angela Merkel took a much tougher stand than President Obama did, calling the oppression "totally unacceptable," while all Obama could say was that it's "deeply troubling" (video here).

President Obama's halting comments only made clear his fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the Islamic regime. It appears President Obama is going to betray the Iranian people as Jimmy Carter did 3 decades earlier. Senator John McCain, President Obama's rival in last year's US election, described the president's response as "tepid," and blasted him for abandoning the "fundamental principles" of the United States. Iranian people don't expect the Americans to come to Iran and fight for them. Every decent and freedom-loving nation knows that the Iranian people have the right and the duty to change their form of government. What Americans can do for the Iranian people is to lend them their support; not to fight on their behalf, but to rally to their side and to cheer their struggle.

We Iranians in spirit-free people of the world--greatly cherish liberty, where the mind is imbued with enlightenment, and every individual, by the virtue of being born human, is afforded freedom. It is within the open expanse of liberty that each and every person can be at his or her best. And when the individual person is at his best, humanity is at its best.

Today, we are reaching outside of ourselves.  Today, we are raising our own standard.  Today, we are standing tall and declaring our perpetual commitment to the liberation of Iran and her citizens. Today, we are marching for the support of the brave and courageous people of Iran. Today, our demonstration is inspired by demonstrations of the Iranian people inside Iran against the dictatorship and barbarity of the Islamic Republic. We shall all demonstrate until every Iranian is free. Today, everyone is an Iranian.


 

A gathering wave on the horizon? Public sentiment on national health care not what you might think it is...

You probably didn't know that public opinion today is less favorable to a major overhaul of the health care system than it was the last time a big push was made back in 1993. From the Pew Research Center:

As health care reform legislation moves forward in Washington, the political environment is somewhat different than the last time a major overhaul of the health care system was attempted sixteen years ago. In early 1993 the sense of a health care crisis was far more widespread than it is today – a 55% majority in 1993 said they felt the health care system needed to be “completely rebuilt” compared with 41% today. Health care costs were also a broader problem in 1993 – 63% of Americans said paying for the cost of a major illness was a “major problem” for them, compared with 48% currently.

The issue of limiting overall health care spending is also more prominent in 2009 than it was in 1993. Somewhat fewer today say the country spends “too little” on health care, and a larger share believe that limiting the overall growth in health care costs is a higher priority than expanding coverage. But overall, public support for guaranteed access to medical care for all Americans remains widespread.

And some say that a major reason for the Republican takeover of the US House in 1994 was a direct result of the pushback against nationalized health care, or, as it was called at the time, "Hillary-care." Will "Obama-care" bring the same response? Now is the time for the Republicans to recruit good candidates that can take advantage of the coming backlash.

What we as conservative members of the GOP must watch out for and be on the guard against is the resurgence of the moderate Charlie Bass/Christopher Shays- types. Seeing them go was about the only happy by-product of recent Democratic electoral successes. We need to nominate good, solid free-marketeers unabashedly promoting basic, small-government, private property-protecting conservatism for the next round of National elections. Otherwise, we're going to get stuff like socialized medicine and other socialistic systems whether we like it or not. The compromisers give ground that it is often difficult, or impossible to regain once lost. We're on the brink NOW. Hopefully, learning this polling data reveals that public opinion is on the side of right, it can be translated into action come election time.

Oh, and one last thought. Instead of bullying my private insurance carrier out of business, how about making MY access to health care easier. Why don't you let Wal Mart or CVS or anyone else, for that matter, open so-called convenience care centers offering basic medical care at an affordable rate? Why can't I purchase insurance to cover specific circumstances of extreme need instead of the everything option? Auto insurance works that way. Why not offer tax incentives for people to deduct health care from their income taxes, and encouraging good health practices through a worthwhile HSA saving/health card option where unspent monies stay with the ratepayer?

Indeed, there are many alternatives that can actually fix what degrades the system. In fact, if you are like me, you believe that what truly ails it is too much government involvement. What we need is MORE free market and LESS government. That's the opposite of what Obama and the Democrats are offering. I think that over time, most Americans will come to understand that, news propaganda outlets like ABC notwithstanding...

June 20, 2009

Something to consider when considering Waxman-Markey or the "Son of Kytoto"

Always remember this about the Kyoto Treaty:

  • The politicians lie when they claim that Bush pulled us out of the treaty - remember: Al Gore signed it and the Congress said no 96-4 (they knew it would be an economic disaster).
  • The Mainstream Media perpetuates this lie (utter stupidity?  clueless to economics? utter obsience to Obama?)

We actually are doing far better as a non-signer of the Kyoto Accord than those that did (and continue to pat themselves for good intentions and rotten results) and spent billions for nothing:

  • Gwyn Prins of the London School of Economics and Steve Rayner of Oxford University say the Kyoto Protocol, “as an instrument for achieving emissions reductions, has failed . . . It has produced no demonstrable reductions in emissions or even in anticipated emissions growth." Meanwhile, the United States is having better luck at controlling its emissions, without the multi-billion-dollar mandates of Kyoto.
CO2 Emission increases:
  • United States - 0.7% from 2000 to 2006,
  • CO2 emissions increased 21.6 percent worldwide
    • Europe - 4.9%
    • Middle East - 37.6%
    • Asia - 52.3%
  •  India - 27.7%
  • Malaysia - 45.8%
  • China - 103%
  • In 2006, China passed the United States as the world’s biggest carbon emitter
  • China’s energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide will exceed American emissions by
    • almost 15 percent in 2010
    • by 75 percent in 2030.
  • China and India together accounted for:
    • 1990 -  13 percent of the world’s emissions
    • 2005, their contribution was 23 percent; and in
    • 2030, they are expected to account for 34 percent of the world’s emissions.

With Waxman-Markey, our economy will be subservient to both China's and India's refusal to go along with capping their emissions.  In fact, China is acting like an school bully demanding your lunch money - they will THINK about regulating their emissions IF and ONLY IF we give them billions and give them our technology.

In otherwords, they are going to pull the same stunt for emissions that Iran / North Korea are doing in the nuclear arena.

So, how big of a chump is that going to make us look like?  Or are we there already?

Billions upon billions - for 0.1 degree C in 100 years mitigation. They bully, we pay the tribute, for not much of a result.

And the taxpayers, once again, are the chumps for the clueless politicians and the watermelon eco-wackos.

We're told that atmospheric CO2 concentrations are the highest in 2.5 million years.  Our temperature should be skyrocketing - after all, during the last two decades, the CO2 has been going up and up - the models are predicting destruction!

Hmm (emphasis mine):

It's probably worth taking note of NOAA's monthly climate summary for the U.S. Here is the summary for May, passed along without comment:

The average temperature in May 2009 was 62.5 F. This was 1.4 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 24th warmest May in 115 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. 

 

Only the 24th?  Shouldn't it be....1st?

I talked to the local farmer that employs the son of DCE over at Weekend Pundit (who just put up his own latest Global Scamming post) - in the 20 years of tracking cloud cover, temperature, and precipitation, May was the coldest so far by 25%.

Warming?  No, think scam.

(H/T: The American via Planet Gore)

Meet The New Press - After the show for 6/20/09

We talked about "Babs" - SENATOR Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and how she insisted on instructing a Brigadier General on how to correctly address her.  Our take?  A snotty attitude of "Do you know who I am and you are inferior to me".  See for yourself:


I found this from Blackfive to be illustrative of the military Code of Honor - something Her Ma'amness could consider.

The difference between addressing someone with their title and "Sir or Ma'am"

Apparently, Barbara Boxer, a Senator from California where some of the biggest military bases exist, doesn't understand respect when she hears it.

As a former Army Officer, if one of my soldiers called me "Lieutenant", instead of "el-tee" or "Sir", I would know that he found me lacking.  Calling me by my job title or rank is only done because it is the lowest requirement of respect.

The. Lowest. Requirement. Of. Respect.

If one of my soldiers called me "Captain", without using my last name behind it or "Sir", I would know that he found me substandard.

BG Walsh was showing Barbara Boxer respect by calling her "Ma'am" instead of "Senator."  Believe me, the title "Senator" does not really hold a whole lot of credibility in the US military.  It's a job, and a Corporal leading a team in Baqubah has more honor than most of those holding that title.

Sir or Ma'am is showing Barbara Boxer respect that doesn't have to be shown to her.  BG Walsh can call her Senator all day and night.  Instead, the general called her "Ma'am" - a term in deference to her and to show respect for what she earned.

But if she wants to be associated with that den of corruption and incompetence, be my guest.

Robert Stokely, a Gold Star Dad, has this to ask of you all - Flood Barbara Boxer with letters over how she treated BG Walsh:

She got her dander up because Brigadier General Michael Walsh, in answering her question at a Senate Hearing, said "Ma'am" as a form of address.  She demanded that he use her title "Senator", saying "I worked really hard for it."  

O.K.  I am sorry that Barbara Boxer was raised or has forgotten her raising where the very high form of respectful address of a woman is Ma'am, just as one would similarly say Sir to a man.  That said, she either never understood or has forgotten that U.S. Senator is what she does, not who she is.

If she wants respect, dressing down a Veteran who also happens to be an active duty Brigadier General, is a lame way of commanding it.  She apparently never understood, or has forgotten, that respect is what you get by what you give to others.  She should apologize and apologize publicly in the same manner she disrespected BG Walsh, for in such a moment of disrespect to him she cast disrespect on the uniform he wears and those who serve with him.

So, spend 44 cents and send her a letter addressed as above and let her know how you feel.  Or send her a fax if you prefer.  Do not recommend email - that gets junked too easily.  I sent mine and used subject line "How a Veteran was Treated".
Ma'am (Barbara Boxer)
112 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-3553
(202) 224-0454 fax
Robert Stokely
proud dad SGT Mike Stokely
KIA 16 AUG 05 near Yusufiyah Iraq
USA E !08 CAV 48th BCT GAARNG

Note: she decries the lack of civility in the political discourse; she should realize that being condescending to the military is just as bad.

-Skip

proud Dad of the Eldest:  previous US Marine Corp, 2nd Marine Air, Iraq Combat vet

proud Dad of the Youngest: US Army, 101st Airborne (w/future orders heading to Afghanistan)

Meet The New Press - Podcast for 06/20/09

Meet the New Press Podcast 

The MTNP Podcast page is brought to you by:
.

                                                                
Meet The New Press
Radio at the speed of the Blogosphere! 
WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 9am-11am (EDT)
Streaming Live!

To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to save the file for you.

Week of 6/20/09
(Click here for accompanying links)
 
Hour 1              Hour 2

Hour One: 

Grant Bosse from NH Watchdog comes back yet again to talk about his live blogging the NH State budget process and how it will be affecting NH citizens (some of it isn't good at all).  Once again, we see the process of scampering to raise revenues to meet expanded spending - all during a recession.  Cries of deep cuts - even as expenditures will be up another 8%??  Have the Democrat politicians have no mercy towards taxpayers?  Especially as they lower the boom on the tourist trade?  Part 1   Part 2

Our good friend John Hawkins from RightWingNews comes back on to talk about why Liberals and some Republicans hate the fact that Sarah Palin is still sucking the political oxygen out of the air.  We talk about the reasons why and what it may mean going forward - remember, the endless campaign season is just that!  We also talk about Laconia's Bike Week and how John's hometown basically killed theirs.  Last on the list was North Korea and the threat of looney bin Kim Jong-il lofting an ICBM towards Hawaii - has the Dear Leader thrown Obama a curve since he won't play by Alinsky's Rules for Radicals?   Part 1   Part 2

Hour Two:  

Speaking of the endless campaign, Doug and Skip talk NH political future by way of Doug's Governor poll. Why was each candidate listed and what are the thoughts?  Part 1    Part 2

Ryan Bilodeau comes on in the last half hour to update us on his switch from what seemed to be a political future to one as a Catholic priest.  Interesting reasoning with techie bits (Past-Skip trying to persuade his fellow Deacons that online communities will be important.  Now-Ryan talking about Twitter->Bishops tweeting?)  The message has not changed but the delivery has.  Part 1   Part 2 

 

SchlubCam:

Segment 1     Break 1     Segment 2     Break 2     Segment 3     Break 3

Segment 4     Break 4     Segment 5     Break 5     Segment 6     Break 6

Segment 7     Break 7     Segment 8     AfterShow

 

 

 

Wednesday June 24th at high noon: NH Tea Party 2.0. "It's the spending, stupid!"

NH Tea Party

Scandals? Whatchewtalkin'bout? We don't see nuthin'...

 

Obama

Gangster Gov't

Guest post by Nancy Morgan [Originally published at RightBias.com]

Silent Scandals

Most Americans love a good scandal. Schadenfreude, the taking of pleasure from the misfortunes of others, is a basic element of human nature. Granted, not the prettiest, but nonetheless, there is something deeply satisfying about seeing the mighty brought low, the arrogant humbled and the wrongdoer getting his just dessert. A reminder to us all that misfortune is not ours alone.
 
Mainstream media obliges and indulges this base emotion, as ever more 'news' concentrates on he said, she said imbroglios. Ratings soar as the latest Palin/Letterman twist is breathlessly reported. Internet news providers join in by posting the most lurid and shocking aberrations of the unlucky few who had the misfortune to get caught in what the media decides is a 'scandal'.
 
Oddly enough, despite the guaranteed ratings that accompany most scandals, the media is choosing to ignore what many consider major scandals - or would consider major scandals if they were actually reported. But they're not. The media, working in tandem with liberals, oops, progressives, now decide which scandals get coverage, raising the question, 'Is it still a scandal if its not reported?' Inquiring minds want to know.
 
In just the last month, an unusual number of what were formerly regarded as scandals went unnoticed and largely unreported by the old media, to wit:
 
Obama recently fired an Inspector General of Americorps, giving him one hour to resign or be fired. This, in direct contradiction to legislation Obama co-sponsored as Senator, requiring 30 day notice and an explanation. Obama, after railing at Fox News for their audacity in pointing this out, declared that he didn't fire Gerald Walpin because he was investigating a friend and contributor of Obama. No, he was firing him because the Inspector General was 'confused and disoriented'.
 
Needless to say, if Obama took the time to personally fire everyone who was 'confused and disoriented', he'd start with his own press secretary and then go on to, well, I digress.
 

Despite the numerous and ongoing media stories regarding former President Bush's perfectly legal firing of US attorneys years ago, the media, with a handful of exceptions, has decided not to report that Obama's firing of Gerald Walpin was not an isolated incident. Two other IGs have been dismissed in the past two weeks. The media has ignored this alarming trend, focusing instead on Donald Trump's firing of Miss California. Moving on...

Monica Conyers, the wife of longtime Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) received a letter Tuesday indicating a pending indictment from federal authorities on corruption-related charges. Yawn. Good thing it wasn't Newt Gingrich's wife.
 
News briefly surfaced that Senator Dick Durbin, after a closed door meeting with the Federal Reserve right before the economic crash, quickly cashed out his stock holdings, raising the question of insider trading. A question which will most likely go unanswered. Martha Stewart must be fuming.
 
A report detailing how UN workers are actually stealing food from the starving people for whom it was intended and selling it on the black market was merely a blip on the radar. The UN said it had no idea that the food wasn't getting to the starving people of Somalia until shown pictures of UN-packaged goods on sale. Yawn.
 
Likewise a report detailing about $55 billion worth of fraud to date in the handling of the so-called stimulus funds went virtually unreported. Billions of our tax dollars, down a black hole. A non-event.
 
And remember 'Cold Cash' Jefferson? The Democrat caught with a cool $90,000 in his freezer? He's currently on trial. The media has chosen not to cover the story. Moving on...
 
What about Barney Frank? He blasted President Obama yesterday over a controversial anti-gay marriage court filing and is calling on the commander in chief to explain himself. Something Barney has yet to do when the rare reporter dares to question him about his role in promoting Fannie Mae, to the detriment of thousands of shareholders. (Or his earlier scandal, when it surfaced that his town home was being used as a gay cathouse by his boyfriend of the moment.)

When's the last time you heard about the ACORN scandal? This organization, a recipient of our tax dollars, is under investigation for voter fraud. The media reporting to date would lead one to believe that its all the fault of a few rogue employees, despite evidence to the contrary, which was reported only by Fox News.

House Democrats just crushed a GOP amendment to cut funding to this scandalous organization. At the same time, they halted a GOP amendment to investigate Speaker Pelosi's claim that the CIA lied to her.  Don't bother looking for this on the nightly news.

The list goes on. Sen. Ronald Burris, caught on tape in a lie regarding his new Senate seat.  Likewise down the memory hole are Charlie Rangel's tax 'misstatements', Harry Ried's questionable land deal, and Obama's questionable land deal. Democrats, all.

Oh, and let's not forget all the questions, unreported by the media, regarding why Obama has refused to release his birth certificate. Or his college transcripts.
 
Here's another scandal. A huge scandal that affects each and every one of us. The media's selective reporting, and non-reporting, that has resulted in many Americans actually believing that the GOP is the party of scandal, the party of the ethically challenged. I find this scandalous. But then, I'm just an average American in flyover country, one of the peons the media is supposed to keep informed.

The real scandal is: Its not a scandal if a Democrat does it, if it involves a progressive cause, or if the media decides not to report it. This effectively denies every American the right to enough information to make an informed decision. Yawn.


Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina

 


 

June 19, 2009

MTNP Radio. Like Bike Week, you just have to...

Bike Week 09

Starting Saturday morning at 9 am!

As usual, this week's broadcast version of GraniteGrok and Now!Hampshire.com brings an array of items and guests for your consideration-- ALL STARTING AT 9AM! As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here for instructions on how to connect and listen on the Internet via livestream. (Podcasts here)

 

  • Ryan Bilodeau appeared on MTNP Radio several years ago to discuss events transpiring at URI. At the time, he was the chair of the College Republicans in that Rhode Island school. Fast forwarding two years to the present, Ryan has just graduated and sets off on a new path in life. In a very moving note delivered via Facebook (and reprinted here on the 'Grok), Ryan told friends

I’m writing this message today in a medium that provides for the most amplification possible. My motivation also emanates from the joy resulting from the path down which I have begun to walk and the subsequent desire to share it.

Let me begin with a passage from the Bible that explains everything: "I will give you shepherds after my own heart." Words found first in Jeremiah 3:15 and echoed later by John Paul II in his encyclical letter "Pastores Dabo Vobis," they truly represent my pivoting from the political and earthly world in which I resided into the one I enter next: a spiritual one. This Fall I will be entering Our Lady of Providence Catholic Seminary.

We'll discuss his motivation to pursue a vocation desperately in need of new members. With the local Catholic priests rotating out, and the merging of several parishes, it will be good to get this young man's take on the future of the Church. Interestingly, down in RI, which iis where Ryan lives, the Churches are still quite full. Is it coincidence that that state is the lone New England hold out with regards to gay marriage?

  • And of course, ===============>> Your calls are encouraged at 603 527 1490.

It all starts at 9AM EST Saturday. Tune in if you're in Central NH at NewsTalk 1490AM WEMJ or live on the 'Net here... This is not your Poppy's radio show. No "pretenders" here! Wink


 

Getting closer to Obama Transit for all?

 

clunkers

I have read for years that we have to depend more on Mass Transit.  Well, that MIGHT work alright for high density urban areas (quick - can you tell me WHICH urban transit systems do NOT need tax subsidies?), but not so well for suburban or rural areas.  Well, comes the retort, we need you all to move back to the cities, you retards! 

Effectively, that's what a lot of planners want - they hate the idea of "sprawl" - you know, suburbs, where everyone gets to live in their own home in their own plot of land.  Gee, that means more cars and more gas and...shucks, people deciding for themselves how to live their lives (I'm not a fan of planners who seem to know what's better for me with the ideas of "smart living" and walkable areas - if I wanted that, I'd make the decision to move....which I won't as I lived in one of the nation's pre-eminent walkable cities - which is the reason why I live in a rural area).

Anyhow, I'm off topic.  I earlier blogged about the "Cash for Clunkers" bill here; the summary was:

  • More money being spent that we don't have trying to have Government solve a problem that the free market should handle under the rubric of getting "polluting cars" off the road (and we'll end up with smaller cars that will yield more automobile related deaths).
  • We're going to get stuck with Obamacars - make no mistake, his mitts are all over GM & Chrysler (who, along with other car companies, are slavering at the lips in this further engagement of fascism / corporate capitalism -> RENT-SEEKING)
  • The turned in cars are not for trade-ins - they are to be crushed
  • The poor, who rely on used cars, will be out of luck (see above, crushed)
  • The Libs will decry the situation (which they will never admit to have created [re: Barney Frank and Fannie & Feddie Mac]) and demand that we plow more money into Mass Transit.
  • Taxes - up.  

Sigh. Well, it seems this totally craptastical bill is mushing forward (here and here)

"Cash-for-clunkers will provide a much-needed, short-term boost to the auto industry," said American International Automobile Dealers Association President Cody Lusk in a statement. "Americans need a reason to return to their local dealership, and this program, which benefits consumers and the environment, is a very good reason."

The program would take effect within 30 days of being signed by President Obama, which he has said he will do. Cash-for-clunkers is expected to be in operation in early August.

How it works:

  • Passenger cars from 1984 or newer with combined miles per gallon ratings of 18 or less are eligible. Owners could get a $3,500 voucher if they trade for a new car rated at least 4 mpg higher or $4,500 if they buy a car that gets 10 mpg more.
  • SUVs, pickups or minivans 1984 or newer that get 18 mpg or less could earn a voucher for $3,500 if their new SUV, truck or minivan gets at least 2 mpg more than their old vehicle or $4,500 if the new truck or SUV gets at least 5 mpg more.

In either case, the owner of the trade-in must have had it at least a year, and it must be drivable. Dealers must provide assurance the trade-in then is scrapped.

Right - a Billion bucks for a prop-up and yet another "feel good" useless program.  At least there was one adult willing to stand up for the taxpayer:

"It's a billion dollars of new costs put on our children's shoulders," Gregg [That would be Judd Gregg, R-NH   -Skip]  said. He used a relatively obscure Senate rule to try to remove the "cash for clunkers" language from the bill.

Make no mistake - Obama will sign the bill.  

Such a furor over people having to pay for other people's mortgages.  Congratulations - now you'll get to pay for their car too...

Iranian "elections"~ A daytime coup d'Ʃtat?

Ahmadinejad.asshole
Iran Election: The Beginning of the End
By Amil Imani & Dr. Arash Irandoost

Iran's President Ahmadinejad, a veteran of the Islamic Republic's repressive Revolutionary Guard, took office on August 3, 2005, after unexpected win in a sham presidential election -- there are no democratic elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran. All candidates are prescreened by the Guardian Council before they are allowed to run for office.  In practice, a president of Iran is already chosen through a farce process of giving the voters a chance to elect one of the men hand-picked from the regime's functionaries, as was the case with President Ahmadinejad.

During the previous "election," only a small percentage of the voters bothered to vote, since voting under the pre-screening and undemocratic system of the mullahs is more like selection than election. The result of staying away from the polls materialized in the person of the fascist Ahmadinejad.

The great majority of the people of Iran are disillusioned and even disgusted by the mediaeval incompetent, oppressive, and corrupt rule of the mullahs, irrespective of which mafia gang is in power. The votes, more than anything else, are protest ballots cast against the entire system, rather than indications of support for the so-called conservative-moderate coalition.

It took less than 4 years for Iranians to realize that boycotting the so-called elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran can only bring to power even a worse bunch of Islamofascists. This time around the people turned out to vote for the lesser of two camps of evil -- the mullah dominated gang of conservatives and "moderates."

After a fiery month long campaign and unprecedented passions and tensions, the mass rallies, polished campaign slogans, savvy Internet outreach and worldwide televised debates, which revealed rampant corruption, ineptitude, and illegal and criminal activities of all four candidates, on June 12, 2009, the Iranian people went to the polls, challenging not only the incumbent president Ahmadinejad, but the entire establishment of the Islamic regime.

Iran's elections are considered extremely unfair and the Islamist government does not allow international monitors to be present. The ruling clerics put their stamp on the elections from the very beginning by deciding who can run. It is really a joke.  More than 470 people sought to join the presidential race, but only Ahmadinejad and three rivals were cleared.

However, the turnout was massive, a near record high 85 percent of Iran's 49.2 million eligible voters. Based on the information from Mousavi's website , a group of Interior Ministry employees have leaked out the following results which seem to be closer to reality than the one released by the establishment:

 

Total eligible: 49.2 Million

Participated in the election: 75% to 85%
Mir Hussein Mousavi: 45%
Mehdi Karoobi: 33%
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 13%
Mohsen Rezai: 9%
Cancelled votes: 3%


 

It is clear that Mr. Mir Hussein Mousavi won the election by a large margin. Ahmadinejad came out third. But on Friday June 12, 2009, in the Islamic election (selection) something happened. Something beyond what anyone could have ever imagined. Something huge. A daylight coup d'état by the elements of the establishment, particularly, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which the Senate designated as a terrorist organization (with Senator Obama not voting). The clerical leadership in Iran has grown increasingly reliant on the IRGC to help it stave off internal pressure for political and economic reform and external pressure resulting from international concern over Iran's nuclear program.

 
An Iranian journalist said, "The important event that took place in Iran is that it wasn't an election; it was a coup d'état. [They] stole 24 million votes of the nation and took them away for themselves. If there were really a winner, they would have to celebrate, but instead they beat people. They performed a coup, but they don't call it a coup."

He continued, "Please don't use the word "fraud" because it is mitigation of what has happened in Iran. Fraud is what was happening in the past 30 years. This is not fraud. They haven't [counted] people's votes. Using the word fraud is like calling a deep cut a small scratch. There was no fraud; it was a coup." 

What the so called reformists call a coup was described today as a great achievement by the Islamic Republic Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the man who has the final say in all affairs of the country. It was no secret by that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was Khamenei's favorite choice. If an electoral fraud, tantamount to a coup, had indeed happened, everyone believes that it certainly had Khamenei's blessing. 

Demonstrators, on Saturday, were shocked and angry by Ali Khamenei's disregard for their vote and apparent coup. "If Mr. Khamenei cannot tolerate even a mild-mannered president like Mousavi, then I really don't know what to do," said a demonstrator, who was among thousands of students on Pahlavi Avenue before she started to chant "Death to the dictator". The day after the election, Khamenei urged the nation to unite behind Ahmadinejad and called the result a "divine assessment."

The political chief of the powerful Revolutionary Guard warned it would crush any "revolution" against the Islamic system by Mousavi's "green movement" -- the signature color of his campaign. However, on Saturday and Sunday, hundreds of thousands of opponents of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad clashed with Hizbollah thugs dressed in police uniforms in the heart of Iran's capital, pelting them with rocks and setting fires in the worst unrest in Tehran since the 1979 Islamic revolution. They accused the hard-line president of using fraud to steal the election victory from his reformist rival.

The ever-conniving mullahs dread the Iranian people. Granted that a small percentage of Iranians, known as the 3Fs -- fools, fanatics and frauds -- support the mullahs. No totalitarian rule can ever survive without a segment of the population, for one reason or another, supporting it. Yet, time is not on the side of the mullahs. By their mismanagement, thievery and oppression of the masses, they have created explosive internal conditions. As I have said over and over, the Mullahs need to have the N- bomb to create a fake sense of security so they can prolong their survival. 

It was reported and verified by a Spiegel German reporter in Iran that the regime has brought many Arab speaking Hizbollah factions from Lebanon to attack the Iranian people. Overnight Sunday, police reportedly raided student dormitories at Tehran University where some 3,000 students had earlier held an anti-Ahmadinejad rally. Rooms were damaged, computers smashed, and hard drives taken, and students beaten and arrested, according to the Associated Press (AP). It is that reported 5 students have died in the attack.

The vicious attacks on people by the hired thugs of the regime are failing more and more as the mullahs' instrument of rule by terror. The police and official security apparatus are less and less willing to exercise brute force to suppress the people. That's exactly why the regime has imported Arab speaking terrorist groups such as Lebanese Hizbollah and Palestinian thugs.

In short, Iran is in a state of serious upheaval. Replacing Ahmadinejad with the already tried and proven wanton gang of Rafsanjani-Khatami-Mousavi is not going to change matters much. 

As for the West, it is prudent that it does not embark on a trigger-happy, self interested policy. The mullahs' lease on life, [short of brutal massacre of the Iranian people in the absence of any foreign media] is just about over. A concerted political, economic, and moral support for the long-suffering and valiant Iranian people and the secular opposition can put an end to the shameful and hate-driven Islamofascists of any and all stripes.

Washington's financial figleaf

WASHINGTON’S FINANCIAL FIG LEAF

So, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and the Obama Administration have now made a proposal for financial regulatory reform. Clearly, such a proposal was very much needed. But the proposal that the U.S. Treasury has now presented is sorely off target. It is neither comprehensive enough, nor does it address the core problems that everyone on Wall Street knows exist. It merely tinkers on the margins.

Until the fundamental problems are addressed, all we have been given is a fig leaf. This is dangerous as it has the potential of lulling us into a false sense of complacency. We have been here before with smaller crisis (such as with the Long Term Capital fiasco) and nothing was learned. Let’s not repeat our mistakes.

One of the principal reasons for the current financial crisis was the gross failure of the existing regulatory institutions. President Obama himself openly acknowledged this when he announced his reform package. Regulatory reform has been very much needed for a long time and very little has been done to fix the problems that plague our financial institutions.

The Geithner plan calls for a massive expansion of the powers of the Federal Reserve. Without a doubt, of the financial regulators that are examining the banks, the Federal Reserve is the most sophisticated. But, this is off a very low base. The Fed’s regulators are too young, inexperienced, under compensated and hardly the best we can get in the financial markets.

Nor is it clear...
...that such powers should reside with this institution. There are very good arguments that the Fed should concentrate its attention on monetary policy. Consumer protection is not a subject that falls naturally into the Fed’s expertise. It is hard to see the Fed overseeing insurance companies, the enormous number of non-bank financial companies such as the hedge funds, private equity, corporations such as GE, American Express, the savings and loans, the mortgage companies, etc.

It has also been very clear that a fundamental reform of the rating agencies is sorely needed. What has been proposed is tepid at best. Their entire business model needs to be revamped. For one thing, they can’t continue to be paid by the companies they are rating- an obvious conflict of interest.

There is a proposal to create a new agency to, “protect the consumer.” But isn’t this what the entire system of financial regulation is supposed to do? Moreover, the new agency is merely a new agency to oversee the operations of two smaller agencies, hardly something that will inspire great confidence. It is just another layer of bureaucracy.

A much greater oversight of derivatives trading is very much needed. The new proposal offers up several measures. But what has been offered up is far short of the mark. The new proposal is that simple derivatives be traded on an open exchange. But, they already are. Simple derivatives were not the problem that caused the financial crisis. It was the customized derivatives, that are highly complex and mathematical, that helped get us into the current mess. Those derivative instruments cannot be traded on an exchange and everyone in the financial markets knows this.

Arguably, the various financial regulators (such as the CFTC, the OTS, the OCC, the FDIC, etc.) all need to be melded into one over arching regulatory agency. This would eliminate the differing regulatory philosophies, rivalries and the fierce competition that currently exists. It would also put an end to the proactive shopping around for the most favorable regulatory ruling.

And how about reexamining the responsibilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which regulates the securities market, and oversees futures trading? The SEC is the same agency that received written notices over a ten year span that Bernie Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme and did nothing about it.

The new Treasury proposal oddly suggests that the SEC and the CFTC should have joint responsibility for regulating derivatives. The proposal argues for “clear, unimpeded authority to police and prevent fraud, market manipulation and other market abuses.” It would authorize both the SEC and the CFTC in keeping with their respective missions, to impose record-keeping and reporting requirements on all such derivatives. Really? Two sets of reports will now be required as well as two regulatory rulings?

Merging regulatory agencies means dealing with the committee chairmen in the Congress who guard their turf with the greatest of zeal. But this means challenging the status quo, clearly something the White House is very reluctant to do.

If we are to have world class financial markets and if we are determined to ensure that we do not have another crisis like the one we are living through, serious change must occur. This package reflects two things. First, is reflects a fundamental lack of understanding for how the markets really works, which is why at least some private sector experience in the U.S. Treasury is much needed. But secondly, it reflects a rush to do too many things at once at the risk of not doing anything in a thorough manner.

The "ONE" Program: We Need Academic Excellence for the Classroom, not an Agenda

public school

Letter To the New Hampshire State Board of Education:
 
Good afternoon.  I write to you today in opposition to the proposed implementation of the "ONE" curriculum in the New Hampshire public school system.
 
While poverty in Africa is certainly a global issue/problem deserving of attention from the citizens of the United States, I have grave concerns that adding to the curriculum would again, reduce the amount of time students spend on academic content.  One cannot expect to add anything to the curriculum without subtracting from another area. 

I'm also concerned as to how this information would be given to students.  This is a highly political issue and like any other political issue, one can certainly sway children into a political ideology adding biased information or by leaving out critical facts.  
 
Too often our classrooms are becoming an atmosphere of political indoctrination. This has real ramifications on student achievement.  
 
The article I read today referred to giving students a global competitive edge by exposing them to the "ONE" curriculum.  I beg to differ.  What gives students a competitive edge in the global economy is academic knowledge.  
 
Right now New Hampshire has some of the poorest math and science standards in the country, noted in a report by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute.   
 
Our current Secretary of Education is looking to implement "Common Standards" to make up for this glaring deficiency in our public school system.  He's been quoted in the Chicago Tribune as saying:

"In too many places, including Illinois, we are lying to children now. [When] we tell a child they are meeting the state standards, the logical implication is that child's on track to be successful. In too many places, including Illinois, if you are meeting state standards you are barely qualified to graduate from high school and you are totally unqualified to go to a university and graduate."  

This is the time for the NH School Board to look for ways to bring academic excellence to the classroom, not a political agenda.  This is a time to go back and look to the best international standards and duplicate those instead of looking to form our students into a political mindset.

 

I have to ask, how does this curriculum make a student a better Scientist, Engineer, or Mathematician?  How does this curriculum improve the academic knowledge of our students? 

While those who proposed this may have the best intentions, parents are craving academic content in their schools to help their children develop competitive academic skills.  How many more parents have to pull their children out of the public schools and either home school them or send them to private schools, where the focus is on academic content instead of on political or special interest indoctrination, before we listen and respond to those requirements?

I encourage you to read over some of the attached articles/ links and shift the focus from non-academics to academic excellence.


Sincerely,
 
Ann Marie Banfield
Education Liaison for Cornerstone Policy Research
www.nhcornerstone.org
NH Coalition for World Class Math 

 


 

Landaff's one-room Blue School: "Intentionally small"

Blue School

Recess at Landaff's Blue School

Guest post by Jeff Woodburn

LANDAFF -   Our vast, complicated education system produced its annual results last week as high schools across the country held graduation ceremonies.  In New Hampshire some ten thousand high school seniors were handed diplomas thus finishing a 13 year process at a cost of around $135,000 per pupil. Educating children has become a costly, centralized and specialized business, and it seems no one is fully satisfied with the results. Education experts and parents worry about the quality of instruction, class size and student safety, yet school districts have become large, impersonal institutions. Over the past 70 years, the number of school districts has declined from 117,000 to around 14,000 even though the student population has almost doubled reports the American School Board Association.

So there should be no surprise that New Hampshire’s once dominant one-room or tiny schools have dwindled to just two: one being Landaff’s Blue School (the other is the Croydon Village School, near Newport).

The path of preservation is never simple. It is usually a combination of circumstances and attitudes. Landaff is defined by a rugged, inhospitable or at least inaccessible landscape—most notably because of the prominent and protected White Mountain National Forest and the Wild Ammonoosuc River. With less than 376 residents spread over its 28 square miles, Landaff has the distinction of having the second smallest numeric increase in population of the any of the smaller communities in the state.  Since 1950, the town added just 36 new residents, including Jason Cartwright, who moved here from Texas ten years ago to run the Tender Corporation in Littleton. Now as a member of the school board, he says the Blue School, much like the town, is not just an anomaly or a relic, but rather is “intentionally small.”

The Blue School sits on a small knoll of land bordered by a stream, a simple baseball field and the intersection of two country roads. There is not a house in view, and little room to park. Parking wasn’t a concern when the school was built in 1858, the year of Teddy Roosevelt’s birth; the Blue School was one of six schools that served Landaff. Over time, the schools were consolidated to one. Former one-room schools, which dotted the rural landscape, were routinely sold off as transportation became easier and were folded into the existing housing stock.

A closer view reveals the building’s antiquity – like the hard wood floors, the large double hung wood stash windows, the thimble that once served the wood stove, old coat hooks in a small ante room that lead to the two small sink-less lavatories (there is shared sink in the ante room) with old tin signs above each. A second structure, a modern, modular building sits behind the old school house.  The two buildings are carefully joined by a roofed breezeway that ensures an actual and visual transition between the two. The newer rectangular building was added a few years back when there was a jump in enrollment. The numbers didn’t hold and the space now serves as the library and lunch room.  Instruction occurs in the large main room of the school house thus protecting the school’s rare status.

 

The 18 students, ranging in grades from Kindergarten to third grade, begin their day with the pledge of allegiance to the flag and then sing a patriotic song with the Head Teacher Claire Cochrane and two students on the piano.   Mrs. Cochrane is a dawdling, unassuming, later-middle aged woman with auburn hair and a conservative pink knit sweater. At the piano crooning a tune she more resembles Edith Bunker, the fictional housewife in the 1970s sitcom, All in the Family, than a strict, dour schoolmarm. At first glance, she hardly seems up to the task.

While many elementary school teachers are notorious for their razor sharp efficiency and “type A” personality, Mrs. Cochrane is more like the intuitive mother of large family. She’s an unflappable, multi-tasker, who moves seamlessly across grade levels personalizing instruction for each child, all the while answering the telephone and performing tasks like changing the paper towel dispenser. On this day, she has another teacher, who handles the Title One services, and an aide.

The new trend in education is to move from lecture style instruction to a more student centered learning. Ironically, with varying grade levels this is precisely what one-room school teachers have always done. The students are in four separate groupings by grade and Cochrane provides a short instruction, assigns a task, models how to do it and with a few questions assesses their understanding of the activity. She then moves on to another group, pausing to say, “I differentiate by necessity.” A one-room school teacher must be a “jack of all trades,” and learn to improvise, be flexible, and like independence. Dr. Robert Patterson, the Interim Superintendent of Schools that oversees the Blue School, agrees the “with the wrong teacher (we’d) have a horror show.”  

Mrs. Cochrane came to Landaff after various small school experiences. For 29 years, she ran the Walden (VT) Academy for Small People, a private Kindergarten to 3rd grade school that she founded. It was there where she honed her laid back style. Private school teachers are not required to be college educated or certified, so it wasn’t until 1987 that she graduated from college and then went on to earn a master’s degree as well.

Her dual passion is bringing arts into the school at an early age and promoting learning through multi-aged grouping. Superintendent Patterson credits Cochrane with a strong emphasis on incorporating the arts in the curriculum, especially the spring musical play based on the story “Bunnicula.” Learning is best accommodated in setting with children of varying ages, Cochrane believes. She points to the interaction between students; the younger ones look up to the older children and try to keep up, and the older children learn how to nurture and teach the younger children and thus develop confidence and leadership skills. She also says the small, intimate setting removes any stigma associated with a child being held back. Without strict compartmentalized classes, “it’s not a big deal,” she adds. The sheer size of the school seems to encourage more students’ freedom to institute some of their own ideas, for example, this year the students decided to elect class officers and produce their own newspaper. These ideas, Cochrane explains, “bubbles up from them.”  Reading, writing and math are offered, but so are French, guidance, karate, and technology.

Students need structure, Cochrane adds, “we rarely get off schedule.” Arguably, the amount of time on task is the most beneficial aspect of the Blue School. The routine is drilled into them for four years, and the students follow it without pause. Transitioning students from grade to grade typically involves a new teacher with a different style and personality. It takes children time – sometimes a few months – to make the full adjustment. Four years with 18 students also gives the teacher the time to really get to know the kids, and this Cocraine says ensures that “nobody falls through the cracks.”

Looking over Cochraine and Patterson’s shoulders is an active and committed school board and beyond that a community with strong personal loyalties to the Blue School. The school’s size “removes a lot of bureaucracy,” School board member Cartwright says, “There are not a lot of people to oversee.” This allows the board to get into the smallest of details – like reviewing student attendance and academic records, specific purchasing decisions, and soliciting volunteers to complete projects that most districts would hire out, like installing computers, building desks and planting flower gardens.

It is indeed rare to find a resident without personal ties to the school. There also seems to be recognition that what they have is fragile and community responds with a rare civic vigor. Last year, the town approved $5,000 in surplus town funds (which was matched by private donations) to build a new playground. 

It is easy to be charmed by the Blue School, but one-room schools are in the words of Superintendent Patterson, “a thing of the past” and “there is such thing as a school being too small.” He’s right; of the 320 elementary schools in the state only 26 have less than 100 students. As regulations continue to mount small schools struggle to keep up. More than ever small rural schools are forgotten. Mary Heath, the Deputy Commissioner of NH Department of Education, said the landmark “No Child Left Behind law didn’t take into account rural areas.”

Still, a quick review of the school performances is impressive. With such a small sampling the Department of Education doesn’t even publish the school’s NECAP (the standardized test called the New England Common Assessment Program) results (although Cochrane claims their a lot better than average). Blue School boasts an attendance rate that is higher and cost per pupil figure that is lower than most schools. Obviously, Landaff’s student teacher ratio is near the top.

“There are a collection of factors that cause things to come together in Landaff,” Patterson said, those include a great teacher, small classes, cultural commitment to the school and community that is willing to take ownership and chip in when needed. The Blue School, says Betsy Cavicchio, former school board member, “is (part of) our identity.”  She predicts the town would support keeping the school open “regardless of what it costs.” The only real threat to the school, she said, is the “town growing” too big.

Jeff Woodburn, of Dalton, is a social studies teacher at White Mountains Regional High School and is a part-owner of the Woodburn House Restaurant, which was started by his grandparents in 1948.


 


 

June 18, 2009

NH Watchdog

popcorn

 

The NH Watchdog, Grant Bosse, is liveblogging the state budget until the fat lady sings. Click here to follow along...

Today is the day: Freedom Ride 2009~ "The Ride to THE ROCK"

Freedom Rally 07

Freedom Rally '07

Today marks the 21st anniversary of America’s longest and oldest continuous weekly POW/MIA vigil, held every Thursday night at New Hampshire’s official memorial at Meredith’s Hesky Park. Additionally, this day marks the 16th anniversary of the Freedom Ride. Started in 1994 by a local motorcycle club, the ride is held in conjunction with the POW/MIA Vigil as a way of bringing both attention and participation to the issue.  It was modeled after “Rolling Thunder” which takes place every Memorial Day in Washington D.C.

The Freedom Ride is held every summer during Laconia Motorcycle Rally and Race Week.   Bikers gather for the 11 mile journey that winds its way along the shores of Lake Winnipesaukee.  The trip ends at Hesky Park in Meredith culminating in a special Thursday night Vigil.  According to its organizers, the sole purpose of the ride is to “keep the promise.”

This year's event will feature Carolyn Maupin, the Mother of former POW/MIA Sgt Matt Maupin.

Those who plan on participating in this year’s ride by motorcycle should arrive at the Gilford Lowe’s parking lot by 6:00 pm tonight (Thursday June 18). The lineup will start at 6:15, with the police escort-led departure for Meredith at 6:30. Of course, the event is not just for those who ride bikes. Others are encouraged to travel via 106 North into Meredith, where there is plenty of parking. Just make sure you’re there in time to get in ahead of the motorcycles, as it will be a sight to behold when they arrive. The vigil itself starts, as it always does, at 7:00 pm sharp. New for this year is a boat flotilla which will leave Fay's Marina in Gilford at 6:00PM.

POW MIA

 

Climate Report: "It contains no new research, but it paints a fuller and darker picture of global warming..."

Bike Week rain

Once again, it’s Bike Week here in Central New Hampshire, and like always, it’s all eyes on the weather. While some reports focus on the economy and its effect on this, the 86th annual occurrence of the world renowned event, make no mistake about it—the weather is what makes or breaks the week.

As I headed off to work Wednesday morning, the thermometer in the truck said it was 46 degrees outside and, a rare happening as of late—it wasn’t raining. Yes indeed, it’s Bike Week and, as those of us that have been here for any length of time, it ALWAYS deluges at least once during the event (on a good year) and, honest to goodness summer never really starts till the thing is over. This year is really no exception, except that is does seem cooler than some years past.

Enter Barack Obama, ready to rain on the already rained on parade. On the same day I noted 46 degrees, I also read about the Obama Administration’s newly released report regarding global warming… I mean, “climate change.” According to the AP story,

“Rising sea levels, sweltering temperatures, deeper droughts, and heavier downpours — global warming’s serious effects are already here and getting worse, the Obama administration warned on Tuesday in the grimmest, most urgent language on climate change ever to come out of any White House.”

Once again, we are being asked, en masse, to suspend disbelief and firsthand observation and facts in order to get with the program of drastic change prescribed as the fix.

And while the situation gets seemingly worse, nothing has really changed fact-wise since the Bush Administration issued its version of the report.

“The document, a climate status report required periodically by Congress, was a collaboration by about three dozen academic, government and institute scientists. It contains no new research, but it paints a fuller and darker picture of global warming in the United States than previous studies.”

 

Be afraid, they tell us. Be very afraid. And of course, the desired response will be to see people motivated by fear do EXACTLY what the global warming zealots want them to do.

As the Chinese communists build new coal-fired power plants like there’s no tomorrow to power their growing economic engine, the US is pushing for proverbial “restrictor plates” on its own—calling for closures of existing stations. Why? We are on the verge of cashing in our present standards and quality of life in some quixotic quest to save the planet, while, on the other side of the SAME planet, our efforts are being nullified many times over. Our leaders are tricking the Nation’s citizenry to willingly place its lifestyle on a downward spiral that, even if global warming was a given, will have zero effect because of the actions of others far outweighing anything that we might possibly do, even if we were to suddenly revert to Eighteenth Century life.

As Team Obama paints a “fuller and darker picture of global warming in the United States," let’s consider some facts. I know this might seem off-base when it comes to this issue, but, for the sake of discussion, we’ll do so anyway.

According to a World Bank ranking, no American city is among the top 50 cities in the world for air pollution.   Another report --“The Top Ten of the Dirty Thirty,” compiled by the Blacksmith Institute of New York-- compared the toxicity of contamination, the likelihood of it getting into humans and the number of people affected. Places were moved up in rank if children were impacted. No US or European sites made the list. Places in China, India and Russia occupied six of the top ten spots. Yet, what does Obama tell THEM about pollution? No, instead, he scolds us for the way WE live. And we accept it, almost without question.

Fareed Zakaria, author of The Post American World writes,

“The combined carbon dioxide emissions from the 850 new coal-fired power plants that China and India are building between now and 2012 are five times the total savings of the Kyoto accords. So you can put in all those curly light bulbs and drive all the Priuses you want: India just ate that for breakfast and China will eat the next round of conservation for lunch.”

According to an article last year in DailyTech.com,

“Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded. China has its coldest winter in 100 years. Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history. North America has the most snowcover in 50 years, with places like Wisconsin the highest since record-keeping began. Record levels of Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia, Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile -- the list goes on and on. No more than anecdotal evidence, to be sure. But now, that evidence has been supplanted by hard scientific fact. All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.”

If you think global warming is bad, just consider the alternative. Again, from DailyTech.com:

“Cold is more damaging than heat. The mean temperature of the planet is about 54 degrees. Humans -- and most of the crops and animals we depend on -- prefer a temperature closer to 70. Historically, the warm periods such as the Medieval Climate Optimum were beneficial for civilization. Corresponding cooling events such as the Little Ice Age, though, were uniformly bad news.”

Take heart though, all you Bike Week lovers -- I’ll bet the Lakes Region could easily host a bang-up “Sled Week,” should it come to that!

sled week

 


 

Healthcare - a Right?

I've had this conversation before - and once again, I blame the Education system for not properly training and educating our population on what is a true Constitutional right.  Yup, there are those that believe that Healthcare is actually a Right - or should be.

Problem is of "obligation" - our friend Warner Todd Huston nails the basic argument (emphasis mine):

 

Sure, it’s “compassionate” and all to say that healthcare is a “right.” But is it? Can it BE a right? And just what is a “right” anyway?

Simply defined, a right is something that an individual can exercise (as a sovereign individual) without asking anyone’s permission. It also carries the complementary notion that in exercising that right an individual cannot obligate anyone else to participate because to obligate others to act violates their own freedom of action (summarily eliminating their freedom to refuse to act, for instance).

So, how is health care a right? After all, to exercise the “right” to health care you are necessarily obligating a doctor or other health care professional to assist you with their time and training. Therefore to exercise health care as a “right” you are forcing other people to give you care. But, since your “right” to health care forces others to act on your behalf, you are basically violating their rights to refuse to participate.

Then we get to paying for it. If health care is a “right” then you are obligating government to pay for it and by obligating government to pay for it you are necessarily obligating taxpayers to pay for it, negating their right to refuse to participate.

This means that health care cannot be a right.

 

Putting it another way - a Right is a solo act. A Right is exercised by an individual who may or may not be voluntarily joined in the exercise of that Right by others.  I may chose to exercise my Right to Free Speech - it does not require you to agree or to even listen.  I can practice my religion - you may not agree but it does not impinge upon you directly.  I can choose to gather with other like minded people - it does not compel you to come with me (um, except on those rare occasions that my wife wants to go shopping - face it, I'm compelled to go).

Healthcare, as Warner points out, does require actions of others of time and talent so as to satisfy MY wants or needs.  Is that right?  I believe it is Chile is one country that reports lower healthcare / capita than we do.  One reason is that legally, healthcare professionals (think doctors), are compelled to render services for 6 or so hours each week for free.

Government has taken that time away from them - no pay.  That's servitude in my book.

Others would call it slavery.  For what else is it called when one is forced by Government to do that which there is no compensation? Sorry, mandated volunteerism doesn't make it for me....

 


 

Those that do not study history....

(H/T: Newsbusters):

 

This 1934 Chicago Tribune cartoon gets a further explanation after the jump:

 

The man in the mortarboard flogging the Democratic donkey is Rex Tugwell, the leader of FDR’s “Brain Trust”, a character out of academica. The Brain Trust was supposed to come up with new ideas to help America. The two mortarboard-wearing kids in the wagon represent recent Ivy League college graduates hired to staff the New Deal. The cartoonist from the conservative Chicago Tribune, Mr. Orr, is calling them socialist “pinkos” (term that wasn’t then in use, “pinkies’ is what Orr called them). [...]

The most prominently featured man shoveling money off the wagon is Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace, who was known for his socialist leanings. Most us are aware that FDR confiscated gold in 1934, but most people are not aware that the gold confiscation was a clause in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1934. It is also important to remember that 90% of the American population lived on farms during the Depression.

The man behind Wallace is Harold L. Ickes, Secretary of the Interior and director of the Public Works Administration. As head of the PWA, Ickes had a lot of say on what and where public works projects were built. The biggest of course was the Tennessee Valley Authority. Ickes was well-known for backing many other socialist endeavors. Ickes was also the father of Harold M. Ickes, a key player in the Clinton administration.

The other man behind Wallace was a mystery to me. In fact, I had trouble reading the label on him in the cartoon. That man is Donald Richberg, who was called “assistant president” in the FDR administration. Both he and Ickes came through Chicago politics and were leaders of the Progressive movement there. Both Ickes and Richberg were key players in pushing the National Industrial Recovery Act which imposed fascist codes of conduct on American industry which dictated how key industries in America were to be run. The National Recovery Administration was ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935, which decision led to FDR’s effort to “pack” the Supreme Court with more cooperative justices.

The significance of this cartoon is that it depicts the visible signs of manipulation by the financial elite that runs America, which was in full control of the country back during the Depression, for decades before that and for the decades leading up to the present.

June 17, 2009

It is the traditional American culture that makes them want to emulate us

Obama and the Progressives are all about the Collective - we're all in it together, only the group can solve the problem, we have to rely on us all.  To some degree, it is right, but when enforced or coerced, no - it is not the right answer.  It is "rugged individualism", the yearning to better oneself and do better by one's family, that has been one of the driving forces of American culture.

One that the Libs, with the incessant dribble to denigrate "the cowboy" image and to rely not on oneself but on Government or others, may prove to be our military downfall (as well as economic and cultural).  After all, there can be no "equal outcomes" in a war now, can there?  Wars are fought to a binary result - you either win, or you lose.

As this post from Stragegy Page points out, other countries may well outdo us in some things, but there is that certain difference that Americans bring that no one else can match (emphasis mine):

June 16, 2009: As foreign military leaders (especially those in China) scrutinize American military performance in the last decade, there is a debate over how to replicate it for themselves. The American achievement has been striking. They defeated a seemingly intractable Islamic terrorist campaign in Iraq, and are inflicting the same kind of damage on the Taliban in Afghanistan. In doing this, the U.S. troops are suffering casualties at a third of the rate of previous wars, and with fewer troops in combat (to accomplish similar tasks from past wars.)

It's not just the fighting prowess that is envied, but the ability to quickly solve tactical and technical problems, and rapidly adapt new technology and tactics to battlefield needs. And then there's the fact that the United States is still, after over a century,  the largest economy on the planet. Yet Chinese students score higher on math and science tests than do their American counterparts. A disproportionate number of graduate science students in the United States are from China, because these schools are seen as the best in the world. Many Chinese believe that this shows how China will surpass America. But Chinese military analysts looking at Iraq and Afghanistan, are not so sure. The Americans are not the best at math or physics, but they do have a knack for coming out on top. There's something else the Americans have going for them that doesn't seem to be widely recognized, or even have a name.

Some Chinese, who have been educated in the United States, and come back home to work, talk about the spirit of entrepreneurship and individual accomplishment. This is quite different from the collectivist and statist (state control) attitudes that dominate in the rest of the world. America has, for over a century, been the source of the most new jobs, and new businesses, on the planet. Those attitudes of innovation and accomplishment seem to have carried over to their armed forces as well.

The Chinese leadership does not want to encourage entrepreneurs and individualists. In Chinese history, this has led to change and unrest. Chinese leaders see this sort of thing as disruptive to the natural order of things. So the generals and admirals are told to take what they can from the American experience, and leave behind what China cannot digest.

Freedom breeds this sense of self-reliance (and visa versa). A can-do spirit is still there. Yet, the Liberals are all but hell-bent in getting rid of it with a larger Government that insists to do more and more for us whether we want it to or not.  Could it be that they have no sense of it themselves?  Or that they cannot trust themselves to be self-reliant? This could be a Goose / Golden Egg situation if they don't realize the cultural ramifications.

If the Liberals are successful, they will remake America to be like the rest of the world - I, for one, am opposed to that.  Why in God's green earth would I want to be like everyone else when when everyone else wants to be like us?

Hey, Libs - you listening?  You change us, the Law of Unintended Consequences may kick in. With results that may well result in a Really Bad Hair Day.

 

So, how's da Hopey Changey thingy workin' fer ya?

So, not so much.  Typical Chicago results from the Community-Organizer-In-Chief - nada!  And we should be surprised?  Obama's own book said he was a failure at being a C.O. - he couldn't get the job done after 3 (4?) years? Looks like his economic policy results are looking pretty much the same as his C.O. results - lots of rhetoric, lots of people riled up, not much for real results.

 To my uneducated eye, kinda looks a failure so far......time to do something that you're real good at along side with something that your not very good at  - like using the "I" word with the phrase "screwed up royally"?

This chart screams - "we're wasting $787 Billion for this?!?!?!?".

Can we do a rewind and go back to "do nothing"?  It's like in tennis - when somebody loses a set 6-love and gets upset about some friendly ribbing and says "and you could do better?"; my retort is always "Well, I can't do any WORSE now, can I?"

(H/T: Innocent Bystanders)

NH Democrats propose "fun tax"

bowling for taxes

Well, that's not what they're calling it, but it's what they might as well call a tax that basically seeks a cut of anything that ordinary people might consider "fun."

From James Pindell's NH Political Report:

State House abuzz over 'entertainment tax' concept

CONCORD -- Lobbyists and budget writers are abuzz over a last minute idea to establish an "entertainment tax" to the state budget that some are already suggesting would basically be a back-door sales tax.

In a statement late this afternoon, NH GOP CHair John H Sununu said

“The Democrats’ believe it’s OK to break ‘The Pledge’ to oppose a sales tax and an income tax - as long as they only break their promise a little bit. But a sales tax on ‘entertainment’ is in fact a sales tax, and an income tax on capital gains is in fact an income tax."

 “Once again the Democrats are showing us that you can’t believe any campaign promise they make.”

And so the beat goes on. The State of NH, led by the majority Democrats, not satisfied with a budget they passed the last time already deep in the hole, continue to dig in the upcoming budget. Because of their innate inability to stop spending, they are creating a crisis that ultimately seeks to create a crisis so big that "only a broadbased tax will fix."

Will the last person benefitting from the NH Advantage please shut out the lights...


 

 

 

A message to our Legislators (NH & National)

Here in NH, because of runaway spending, the Dems who are in charge of the House, the Senate, and the Governorship, are scrambling like mad - fitting revenues to spending plans is never easy and is bass ackwards.  Here, they want to raise taxes (by getting rid of a credit and spreading taxes upon the small business LLCs) - always forgetting that taxes paid are a forgone opportunity to pay more employees.

Totally opposite to this tact outline here:

AUSTIN – The Texas Public Policy Foundation applauds the leadership of Gov. Rick Perry, Sen. Dan Patrick, Rep. Rene Oliveira, and all of the legislators whose efforts led to today’s signing of House Bill 4765, which increases the exemption for the state’s gross margins tax.

“Small businesses are responsible for most of the jobs in our modern economy,” said Talmadge Heflin, Director of TPPF’s Center for Fiscal Policy. “This period of economic difficulty makes it all the more important to support them, and we applaud Gov. Perry and our legislators for rising to the challenge.”

During the last several years, Texas has led the nation in job creation, exports, and business climate. Recent analyses indicate that Texas was one of the last states in the country to enter the national recession and will be one of the first states to emerge from it.

“Our research indicates that low taxes are vital to a vibrant private sector,” Heflin said. “Texas’ economy is the envy of the nation because our state leaders have kept taxes and spending low, which has enabled businesses to use more of their resources for job creation.”

Texas is about to show, once again, that cutting taxes (like JFK, like Reagan, like Bush) is the way to ignite the economy and thus, raise tax revenues.  This is why we need to emphasis Federalism more - the States can try different models and see which works.

Me?  NH Dems have it completely wrong - and we'll have the shortfalls to prove it.  We used to be like Texas - and we called it the NH Advantage.  Instead, we are going to get this:

Dollars down the toilet 

The Healthcare debate

We do NOT have a free market in healthcare in this country - with Medicare, Medicaid, the VA, and the "Healthy Kids" initiatives (yeah, here in NH, the pols want to spend more $$ that they don't have so that "kids" up to age 26 can get in on this), government already controls a lot of this space already.  That, however, is NOT a reason to cede it entirely to Government.

Obama talks that the only way to save the system is for Government to enlarge its role; that's about as sensical on its face as the Viet Nam war meme of "we had to burn down the village to save it".  In this, he and much of the Statist population and politicians consider it only from a top down consideration.

They forget about the human nature aspect - what's in it for me?". While I had read this  (via Instapundit),

Medicare expenditures threaten to crush the federal budget, yet the Obama administration is proposing that we start by spending more now so we can spend less later.

This runs the risk of becoming the new voodoo economics. If we can’t realize significant savings in health care costs now, don’t expect savings in the future, either.

It’s not the profits of the drug companies or the overhead of the insurance companies that make American health care so expensive, but the financial incentives for doctors and medical institutions to recommend more procedures, whether or not they are effective. So far, the American people have been unwilling to say no.

it was a comment that caught my eye (emphasis mine):

People will do an awful lot of things for money they won't do to save their lives.

This is why HSA accounts work. When you are paying for your own medical care, suddenly there is a big incentive to eat right, exercise and NOT need a bunch of expensive medications and treatments.

Until people start paying for their own health care, there will be no savings realized from any of these programs. People will only care when it is on their dime.

It is not necessary to have all kinds of Government programs and costs to fix this problem.  Rather, it is Government that is the problem by not appealing and enhancing the free choice of people.   Remember, that which you incentivize, you get more of.  Making it such that there is a "what's in it for me" will work.  When the cost of an outcome remains a mere theoretical result, the incentivization falters - cold hard cash does not.

It is BECAUSE there is not direct relationship of the cost of benefit that we are in this situation.  We have health payment plans - not health insurance plans.

Hmm, another way to look at it

With the advent of Obama's bursting onto the national scene and becoming President, Saul Alinksky's "Rules for Radicals" has gotten much play.  In every move, it seems, Obama is playing out those rules in almost every speech

Side bar: is it just me?  I didn't know one could rent that many straw men in such a short period of time.

and action.  And yes, his actions are not matching the rhetoric - there are enough dots out there to start connecting them and the resulting picture is not a pretty one.

Anyways, I ran across this and it stuck, as it seems to mesh well with an overriding sticking point of mine - the demise of self-responsibility (emphasis mine):

Running throughout “Rules for Radicals” is a whiny refusal to take personal responsibility for anything.  It is always “their” fault.

 

Recovery from the disaster in Concord IS possible, but it depends on good people getting active.

lifeline

 

Disaster in Concord

Guest post by Karen Testerman

NH's General Court is proposing to tax anything that is moving or breathing.  However, you the taxpayer know their focus is misdirected.  The whole of the current administration is looking at the symptoms, what they term, "a lack of revenue."

However, the current economic disaster with a growing $150 million deficit is in reality a SPENDING problem. 

It is a sad commentary that the Governor continues to speak out of both sides of his mouth.  On the one hand he told the residents of this great state that we are facing a budget deficit and he would not approve further spending.  Oh, by the way that was several months ago while the corner office worked with both houses to make social reconstruction the number one issue in our state. 

Taking advantage of a self-created "crisis" to re-engineer the foundational institution of society to divert your attention, while the General Court passed spending measure after spending measure to create the current $150 million disaster.  One wonders what underlying activities are taking place while the attention is now focused on the self created "spending spree" crisis.

And now, to address the created budget deficit, the Governor and both houses are proposing tax increase after tax increase and other potential ONE TIME revenue resources like gambling to make up the difference.

However, any of you who sits at the kitchen table knows that if there isn't enough coming in (revenue) then some how the spending (proposed budget) must be reduced.

 

Have you had enough?
Get informed and get involved. 


NH is a unique state!  You don't have to have bundles of money to participate.  You don't have to know someone special or travel in THE influential circle.  The structure of NH allows you, the average resident of NH to be involved in the process. 

We are looking for those who believe in smaller government, personal responsibility and free market capitalism.   As one school in Oakland recently advertised

"Multicultural specialists, ultra liberal zealots and college-tainted oppression liberators need not apply."

For NH to remain and to continue to be first in the nation, or to hold onto the "NH Advantage" will take people with strong fundamental values, like integrity, and a willingness to serve, to step forward. 

It is possible our state to recover from the disasters that are occurring in Concord.  The level and rate of recovery will depend upon how many of her residents will rally to the call.


"Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom." Edmund Burke

Blessings...

Karen Testerman is the Director of Social Policy Coalitions for Eligere Strategies.

Oh Gosh, Dean and I are of one accord on this!

Hmm, do you think that this *might* be the time that he turns from the Dark Side (heh!)?  Maybe not, but there are a few things that both the Conservative and the Liberal can agree on - perhaps for different reasons, but I'll take it.

The Re-Fi Tax: A Lose-Lose Idea

I'm finding it hard to believe that the tax on home refinancing is moving past the trial balloon stage.

Can someone explain to me the wisdom of this?  And that's not a snarky question...

This idea is a political loser. These same families, who in New Hampshire are already burdened with a perverse revenue system aimed squarely at their property, vote.

When the NHGOP and I are in agreement, something has got to be wrong...

Is this all happening because the Democratic majority Senate couldn't stomach a capital gains tax?

No, Dean, it is because they can't stop acting like teenagers with Daddy's open-ended credit card who learned to forge his signature. Trust me, the bill will come due - soon.

With this new NH State Budget looking like another double digit increase (which means a State Budget increase of 23% in 6 years), it is easy to explain - the wisdom is that when you write budgets from the standpoint of spending first, you end up scrambling for income second.  Dean, do YOU do your family budget that way?  I certainly don't - and can't.  So why should Government?

The only snag here, is that Government CAN arbitrarily raise its income by raising taxes.  Which the Dems are trying to do.  Stupidly, as well.  Dean is as far to the Left as I am to the Right - and if we both agree on this - it is STUPID!  

I did like the reasoning by a commenter he highlighted (emphasis mine) and she brings out the actual fact of the matter:

Beverly:
It's a tax.

On a loan.

Far be it from us to tax income. That would be money you have. This is NH, so for astounding and mystical reasons, we cannot tax that.

But money you don't have, money you have to borrow, and will have to pay back: money that is not even yours: That we can tax!  

This is what happens when politicians monkey with tax code - remember, what you tax you get less of.  It also, when multiple streams of revenue are considered, it is amazingly frustrating to figure out "where'd all my money go".

Like Dad, when the credit card bill finally comes into the mailbox.

In another related post, he opines:

I don't actually fault the DRA for coming up with this option.  It's their job to look for revenue when asked by the "Governor and Legislative leadership."

But it's also the job of the "Governor and Legislative leadership" to weigh how awful and unfair it is to balance the budget on the backs of responsible homeowners looking to do the right thing*.

Dorgan has lots more in the Monitor today, including the depressing and predicatble momentum of a Well, It's Either Re-fi or Gambling meme, with little mention of the capital gains tax. 

Hmm, look at the "dog not barking".  One would think that when the shaken piggy bank rings silent, one might think "guess I'm not going to spend any more". I guess we'll have to keep working with Dean on this a while longer....he's starting to see some of the light, I think....

Obama taking away car choice from Americans

As regular readers of the 'Grok know, we often have guest posters.  Don sent me an email offering this Letter to the Editor (sent to our local papers) for posting if I thought it might fit.

It does, I do, and here it is concerning the silliness of jacking up the automobile CAFE standards.  Once again, a regular citizen seeing through the razzle-dazzle of the Obama Administration taking choices away from American people.  After all, if the citizenry (as a whole), really wanted these tiny cars, we'd be buying them already, right?

I know when Government decided to start making decisions for us instead of us making them for ourselves - why do we put up with this nonsense?  We are a free people!

Or are we?

To the Editor:

President Obama has increased the fuel economy standards from 25 to 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) in 2016.  This makes many people very happy.  They are missing some key considerations.

Some cars today offer over 30 and some over 40 miles per gallon (mpg).  They are not selling very well.  Perhaps people prefer safety, comfort, convenience, style, accessories, and luggage and passenger capacity more than miles per gallon.  Apparently that is bad because the government is now demanding that fuel efficiency become more important than any other factor.  You will be forced to take a car without the features you prefer.   

Improved fuel mileage is obtained by reducing vehicle weight which makes  vehicle occupants more vulnerable in an accident.  Historical evidence shows that each increased mpg results in about 7700 extra highway deaths.  Each year almost as many Americans die because of previously mandated fuel efficiency standards as have died in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  

Approximately 80,000 more Americans will die because of  the 10.5 miles per gallon increase.  One has to wonder if American politicians have declared war on American citizens! 

Will electric cars solve this problem?  Manufacturing batteries is toxic for both humans and the environment.  Batteries are heavy.  Electric car batteries won’t last the life of a car and have to be replaced.  They add weight, which limit’s a car’s range, but not strength, therefore not saving lives.

Will hybrids solve the problem?  They have similar battery considerations as  electric cars.  They are expensive.  If they offered what consumers wanted, they would not be sitting unsold on dealer lots today.

Will people save money on gas to make up for the $1300 increase car price that President Obama?  No.  When less fuel is burned, government tax income goes down.  When this happened previously, government just raised the fuel tax rate.  A year ago candidate Obama said he wasn’t upset that we were paying $4 per gallon of gas, just that the price rose so high so quickly.  Would you be happy if the price went to $4 more slowly and stayed there?  Once the gas tax rate goes up, it is certainly not going down again.                    

Some people say we need to raise the mileage standards to reduce our dependency on foreign oil.  If that were the objective, we could reduce this  dependency much faster by drilling and producing our own plentiful oil and gas.  In addition, this would immediately create thousands of good new American jobs that we could use right now!!   

Some say our increased mileage standard will reduce pollution and emissions, and therefore stop or slow global warming.  In reality, the oil and gas we don’t use will be purchased by countries with less stringent or no pollution standards.  This will increase, not decrease, global pollution and emissions and their affects on global warming.

Politicians are always promoting ideas that sound good and sound well intentioned.  The results are usually different.  What raising the US fuel efficiency standard will do is force Americans to give up car features they want,  increase transportation costs, kill about 80,000 extra Americans, increase tax revenue, and increase the global pollution that people say causes global warming.  

President Obama’s increased fuel efficiency standards will hurt American citizens, and it won’t help the planet. 

Don Ewing

Notable Quote - C. S. Lewis

We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise.  We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.

- CS Lewis

(H/T: John)

June 16, 2009

Let's import jobs into New Hampshire

LET’S IMPORT JOBS INTO NEW HAMPSHIRE

In a time of high unemployment, why isn’t NH doing more to promote job creation?

Despite all of our problems, America remains the most attractive market in the world for almost every product imaginable. In large part, this is why most American businesses don’t immediately think of exporting their products abroad - a major failing of ours. But foreign companies are well aware of the opportunities that exist in the U.S. markets. Anyone doubting this should immediately look at the auto industry. The U.S. still produces some of the best cars in the world. But, we do so primarily in the south, in such states as South Carolina, Kentucky, and Alabama and they bear the brand logos of BMW, Toyota, Honda, Infinity, etc.

And it is not just cars; Honda Aviation, for example, recently opened a new plant in North Carolina which will help offset that state’s loss of its old textile mills. Nor is it just manufacturing; the list of businesses is almost limitless, and includes high tech companies, software companies, call centers, etc. Indeed, without such businesses, American consumers would immediately encounter a steep bout of inflation and unemployment.

So here is the question: when Kia Motors or Hyundai were recently looking to open new assembly plants, why is it that no one tried to persuade them to build a plant in NH? With New Hampshire’s great lifestyle, low taxes, our high tech base and our business environment, our state should be an excellent destination for all kinds of business operations. More often than not, foreign businesses are looking to establish operations where the enabling business environment is considerably better than in their home countries. This usually means the U.S.A. It should also mean New Hampshire.

With New Hampshire’s economy softening,  with 50,000 of our citizens unemployed and unemployment rising, tax revenues declining, the state needs to find new ways to improve the business environment and create new jobs. New Hampshire also has one of the oldest populations in the country. We are tied with Florida in this measure. Surely we need new ways of bringing jobs and young talent into the state. It is hard to see a better way of doing so.

Clearly, we need to do a better job of reaching out and make NH’s business climate well known. By all reports, we are not appropriately doing so today. Judging by the successes of other states, NH does little to encourage or recruit companies to move here. Why is it, for example, that foreign companies are moving to Massachusetts’ Route 128 and 495 when NH’s business climate is (despite recent moves by our State Senate) still far more attractive? I asked a personal friend of mine, the President of Infosys (India’s largest and most successful software company), why he didn’t consider New Hampshire when they were expanding their U.S. operations. His response to me was simple. “I do not ever recall New Hampshire ever making a pitch for our business.”

Despite a strong desire of several other Indian companies, to take just one example, there has been very little contact with NH’s state government. Consider this recent quote from the New Hampshire Business Reports: “The Office of International Commerce, which has organized a number of trade missions in various parts of the world, considered a mission to India a couple years ago, but ultimately decided against it. We actually looked at that to see how many would want to go. We didn’t get huge response.”  Or this: “With states such as Texas, Georgia, Alabama, etc. aggressively promoting themselves and getting successful results why would anyone bother looking at New Hampshire?” See (http://www.nhbr.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090313/INDUSTRY09/903119961)  We obviously need to be much more proactive, aggressive and visible.

Just as bad, there has there been no visible effort to encourage exports abroad. Asian countries such as China, India, Vietnam and others are growing at a historically unprecedented rate, far outstripping the growth rates of the industrialized world or their own ability to meet their internal needs. America and New Hampshire can play a vital economic and trade role. New Hampshire exports are growing, proving that it can be done, but we are certainly not maximizing our potential. We should also be encouraging American companies to consider establishing new facilities in our state.

New Hampshire needs to create a platform for aggressive economic development. Yes, the state has an office that is charged with doing this. These responsibilities are housed within the Department of Resources and Economic Development (oddly named DRED) and more specifically the two people in the Division of Economic Development (oddly named DED). If nothing else, the name of these two units tells you a great deal about their marketing acumen. DED is obviously very understaffed and they have few incentives to be aggressive or responsive. Such an office needs to me much more proactive and results oriented. One look at their website relative to that of say Georgia confirms how far behind we are.

Part of the problem is also that DED seems to have very little intergovernmental visibility. I spoke with several very senior, economically oriented members of our legislature who have never heard of them. It would appear that they have very little noticeable support or political backing from our elected officials. When was the last time you heard anyone in NH government mention this subject? This needs to change.Clearly, we need to do much more.

As a candidate for Congress I strongly urge that a great deal more effort be directed by the state to bring in new jobs into the state and that we become much more proactive in promoting greater export linkages abroad. The result could be tens of thousands of new jobs into the state and a rebirth of business vitality.

If elected I will make this one of my leading priorities. As a Congressman, I would encourage foreign companies to build facilities in NH and would work with the Governor of NH to develop an economic development plan to include encourage investment in NH from foreign companies. As the only candidate with any private sector and business development experience I have every confidence I can make this happen.

NHGOP leader identifies the matters that should be of grave concern to Granite Staters these days

NHGOP Chair former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu sat down with The Eagle-Tribune and Derry News editorial boards to talk about the Party, politics, and the current state of affairs in the Granite State...

 

 

The contrast between the Republican chief and Dem leader Ray Buckley couldn't be more stark-- Whether it comes to the business of actually running the state, or the other garbage that the ruling majority has seen fit to focus on during the latest legislative session, Chairman Sununu is spot on with his oft-declared statment:

Democrats are ruining New Hampshire

At least this time, Republicans have a true leader at the helm that actually believes in the principles that set the GOP apart from the Democrats, and isn't afraid to step into the spotlight to defend them. Go get 'em, Governor!

While there may be 50 ways to leave a lover, NH Democrats have discovered only 11 ways to raise our taxes.

Grant Bosse reporting...

Click here to read the 11 new tax proposals as presented to lawmakers. When are they going to get 11 proposals to CUT SPENDING? Outraged? Had enough? Make sure you bring that anger and present it to lawmakers at the next Tea Party Wednesday the 24th of June on the State House lawn. Tell them,

It's the Spending, Stupid!

 

 

The New Hampshire Disadvantage

Eugene Van Loan, Chairman of the Josiah Bartlett Center writes, on the state budget:

Oh, gosh, another crisis in Concord. The Governor says we need to steal another $150 Million to plug the hole in the budget. Otherwise, we will have to plug it with gambling (the Senate’s preference) or a capital gains tax (the House’s preference). What are we to do?

We have already robbed from multiple Peters to pay poor Paul. For example, we have stolen $110 Million from New Hampshire’s hospitals and doctors who naively thought that the surplus they had built up in the so-called Joint Underwriting Association due to their overpayment of malpractice insurance premiums was their money. Also, as Charlie Arlinghaus of the Josiah Bartlett Center recently pointed out in one of his columns, we are probably going to steal millions more from the payers of turnpike tolls to finance repairs to roads driven by people who don’t have to pay tolls. And then there is the State’s theft from our own towns and cities of some $ 50 Million in revenue sharing monies. And finally, our friends in Washington are sending us approximately $160 Million in one-time “stimulus” funds which they have stolen from the next generation of federal taxpayers (our children). And on, and on, and on.

But, as T.S. Eliot said, “Everyone steals; it’s what you do with what you steal that counts.” So, what are we doing with all this loot? Are we at least spending it wisely?

Unfortunately, posing such a question in the halls of the Statehouse – particularly to Democrats - would be an exercise in futility.

Click here to read the rest...

Welcome to the Police States of America. It's happening and it's closer to home than you'd think...

NH cop wear..roadblock

Regular readers know that the rise of quasi-public "special operations groups" (SWAT teams or "SOG") within the Granite State law enforcement community has caught our attention. In this prior post about a raid in Bristol, NH involving some 20 masked police officers, I mentioned two other events involving overwhelmingly excessive force given the circumstances. One happened in state-- the Charlestown incident in which a man in a trailer was killed as a combined special operations group/ state police operation sought to arrest his son. The other I noted occured in Maryland where a SWAT team stormed a mayor's home in search of drugs and ended up killing his dogs as they held him and his mother-in law prisoner in his own home.

The following video is rather chilling, and almost seems the stuff of movies-- but it is all true. I can vouch for the military hardware being doled out to local law enforcement. I got some serious snark from our county sheriff during budget time after I questioned costs of our "South African police tank" vehicle used by the SOG. As I pointed out in a post last week, there is an extensive list of goodies the federal "JAG" grant is pumping into the region. Some of the items one questions whether LOCAL law enforcement, run and financed by LOCAL people, would ever purchase, left to their own devices. And this exclusive 'Grok story about road block activity here in the Granite State is by no means the exception, as that activity too is featured in the vid...

 

 

Several weeks back I spoke with the lawyer representing the Bristol family raided by the platoon of masked "cops." He told me the civil trial should happen in December. He also confimed what I have come to know while studying this topic: These regional SWAT teams, or SOGs, are, for all intents and purposes, private militias unaccountable in any meaningful way to elected governing bodies. Additionally, I have observed that such groups are funded in part by local taxes AND the federal government generally unbeknownst to most folks-- often with NO oversight... Sleep tight. If you hear a knock during the night and it's the police, don't worry. They're probably only there to protect and serve you. 

One day, we'll wake up, and wonder how it all happened. By then, it'll be too late...

 

June 15, 2009

International Baccalaureate (IB). Not really worth it...

Educating for the new world order

Following the same theme raised in this December post on the topic, we now learn that Marblehead Massachusetts has recently rejected adopting the International Baccalaureate program.  According to a report on Wicked Local Marblehead, the school's committee expressed

"reservations about the IB program and will delay the implementation until 2013 for fiscal reasons."

The article goes on to explain how the faculty at MHS

"wishes to completely postpone IB and not invest any more money in it at all at this time or next year...is a rather expensive program to implement, and the faculty wishes to explore it thoroughly to be absolutely certain it’s worth the investment.” 

They also expressed concern over the "unknown fees" associated with the adoption of this program.  It's clear from the article, money could be better used on other priorities. 
 
Several school districts in New Hampshire pushed forward the same program in the midst of an economic crisis and yet other schools are finding it an extravagant program to adopt.
 
Feins, who is an English teacher said,

“Teachers who visited the IB school at the Cape earlier this year did not find anything we don’t already do or couldn’t more cost effectively add ourselves for the entire student body. During the training at Rice University, participants were told the IB certificate was not accepted at American colleges and universities; only by taking the diploma track will credit be considered, and this track will cost more money .  MCAS scores may also suffer."

As many of us have noted, Feins goes on to say,

"Advance Placement is a superior alternative, in the teachers’ view."

Schools like Bedford slipped in the IB program with little or no public input however in Bow the Superintendent conducted meetings and invited the public.  He listened to the concerns from the parents and taxpayers about cost and content and the people decided, thanks but no thanks. 

While some think we have an endless supply of money available to fund these programs, others like me question the fiscal irresponsibility during one of the worst economic times in our history. 


 

Don't forget to make yourself available Wednesday June 24th at high noon. NH Tea Party 2.0

 

NH Tea Party

Jeb Bradley: "Rumors swirl of a third tax stalking horse waiting in the wings..."

tax burden

Guest post by State Senator Jeb Bradley

The Great Tax Debate

The legislative session may be winding down rapidly but the greatest issue of all, the budget, is far from being resolved. The budget debate comes against the backdrop of a distressed economy with high unemployment rates and families and businesses struggling to make ends meet.  Will the conference committee on the budget make this situation worse?

Unfortunately, despite our Live Free of Die motto, this debate is not between those who would frugally limit government and those who would inexorably allow it to grow. Rather, it could be called the Great Tax Debate as various factions of the legislature seek to add their preferred tax hikes to a budget bursting with higher taxes and fees.

Why is New Hampshire in such a tax predicament? Some would argue the recession and falling revenues to state coffers is to blame. That's only part of the story however, as Paul Harvey would say ‘the rest of the story’ is that spending in New Hampshire has increased dramatically.

New Hampshire’s current budget allowed total spending of $10.4 billion up from $9.36 billion in the prior budget. The budget the Senate recently passed proposes total spending of $11.6 billion and the House passed budget was only marginally lower. Bottom line: if this spending plan is ratified, total spending will have increased 23.8% over 3 budgets. It is hard to imagine that the average family or business in New Hampshire has seen their income increase by anything approaching that figure…..that is if they have any income left.

What makes these increases even more staggering is that spending is going down in other states around the country. The bi-partisan National Governor’s Association (www.nga.org) recently released a study that highlights an average 2.2% decline in state spending around the nation in 2009. Furthermore, our nation’s governors are recommending additional spending reductions of 2.5% this year.  But, not New Hampshire, as there is little disagreement among Democratic conference committee members that total spending should increase by $1.2 billion.

With the exception of a few spending reductions such as closing the Laconia State Prison,  the budget debate focuses almost exclusively on new or increased taxes. The House has passed a new tax on capital gains and estates, as well as increases on tobacco products, rooms and meals, insurance premiums, gambling winnings and gasoline.  The Senate has passed expanded gambling for additional revenue, as well as increased taxes on tobacco, rooms and meals, and new onerous business taxes. Both budgets have numerous fee increases. Both budgets raid a fund paid into by doctors designed to keep medical malpractice rates in line. The $110 million raid of this fund will trigger an all but certain lawsuit which doctors stand an excellent chance of winning – because in reality it’s their money.  More cynically both budgets underfund to varying degrees the state’s historic commitment to assisting towns and cities. So property taxpayers are going to be left out in the cold without a seat in this game of musical tax chairs.

Sound chaotic and controversial? It is and deadlines are looming.

 

The package must first be agreed to by the nine legislators on the Committee of Conference, chosen to resolve the differences between the two budgets. Then both bodies must ratify the final package. But the House previously killed new gambling. Senators don’t like the capital gains and estate taxes. The House wants a gas tax. The Senate is ok with tolls. The Senate wants business taxes, the House would tax insurance premiums.  And so it goes --- with precious little talk about decreasing the proposed $1.2 billion total spending increase.

The political reality is: neither plan may prevail. So rumors swirl of a third tax stalking horse waiting in the wings. Details are sketchy, but two new taxes are being discussed behind closed doors.

The first tax proposal would apply the Real Estate Transfer Tax to mortgage refinancing. In other words, as people try to refinance to lower mortgage payments in order to keep their homes, the state would impose an additional tax on them.  At a time when Washington and states around us are adopting policies to help keep people in their homes, Concord is considering slapping a new tax on a family’s mortgage pain. The Portsmouth Herald astutely proclaimed this idea “completely off the wall.”  Amazingly, proponents of this tax have not heard about what is happening in the financial world. The headline in the June 11th Wall Street Journal proclaimed that interest rate hikes (the result of $2 trillion federal deficits) are not only clouding economic recovery but “choking off a refinance wave.” This would be a very painful tax for struggling NH homeowners. It would undermine recovery of housing prices, and would not likely produce the revenue expected.

The second tax in the closet is an attempt to apply the 5% Interest and Dividend Tax to limited liability corporations. This tax would essentially be an income tax on the owners or partners of many New Hampshire’s small businesses. For business owners this is just a new déjà-vu.  They already pay a .75% payroll tax on employee salaries called the Business Enterprise Tax.  Business owners pay an 8.5% tax on profits. How does adding yet another levy these taxes make New Hampshire attractive for business?

Jim Roche, the President of New Hampshire Business and Industry Association called this proposal “alarming” and went on to say, “at a time when businesses up and down every Main Street in New Hampshire are cutting expenses and making painful lay-off decisions in response to the worst economic malaise since the Great Depression, it is astonishing to witness state policy leaders on the cusp of making matters worse.”

And just for good measure….the proposed hike in the Rooms and Meals tax may not raise enough revenue and could be jacked even higher…. at a time that one of NH’s largest industries, hospitality, must compete against other states for declining consumer spending.

So what about cutting spending?  Those like myself who have proposed across the board cuts have been termed simplistic or just the ‘party of no’. Meanwhile despite the spin, these amendments to reduce spending in both the House and Senate have been defeated on a partisan basis. Yet amazingly, when Senator Sheila Roberge and I proposed a specific cut, ending the subsidy on dog racing that costs taxpayers $1 million, that too, was defeated.

There is no question that cutting spending is difficult.  But what’s the alternative – a $1.2 billion increase in spending in New Hampshire while other states are cutting spending? Tax hikes to pay for state spending will only undermine New Hampshire’s competitiveness and ability to grow jobs. Spending cuts may be difficult, but are necessary. Spending cuts are also what New Hampshire individuals, families, and businesses are doing to survive. They are not claiming it can’t be done – they don’t have that option.  Budget writers in Concord should take heed.

 

June 14, 2009

Meet The New Press - Podcast for 06/06/09 - The Late Edition

OK, I know - it's late, real late.  And I'll be adding more over the next few days.  In the mean time, enjoy Hours 1 and 2.Oh, by the way - Grant! Thanks for subbing in for me!  But to call me a "slacker" (because I left to celebrate my wedding anniversary) - hurt to the quick!  8^)

Meet the New Press Podcast 

The MTNP Podcast page is brought to you by:
.

                                                                
Meet The New Press
Radio at the speed of the Blogosphere! 
WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 9am-11am (EDT)
Streaming Live!

To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to save the file for you.

Week of 6/06/09
(Click here for accompanying links)
 
Hour 1              Hour 2

Hour One:  Coming soon er...sometime....I'm working on it....

Segment 1 - Opening Banter - Grant has mustache envy.  Recollection of D-Day; the 65th anniversary of the Allied push to take Europe back from Nazi Germany - something that almost didn't work as they landed on the five French beaches.  The gang talkes about the subterfuge leading up to the invasion.  Thought: would the Press be as pro-American as then if the same thing happened again today - oh, wait...

Segment 2 - Call: Steve from West Virginia Public Policy comes on to say "Hi" to Grant.  Reminder about the Troop Rally next Saturday in Concord at the State House and the Freedom Ride during Bike Week.  Discussion about another anniversary: the WWII's Battle of Midway and why it was so important in beating the Japanese in the Pacific theater.

Segment 3 - Grant talks about NH Senate Democrat President Norelli throwing him out as he is not a "reporter" as he tried to to cover the Senate discussion on the Charter Schools.  He explains that his camera was not going to be allowed to be on the floor - only able to get the back of the bald headed Senators from the Gallery.  In effect, in trying to do the coverage that WMUR does not have time to, Government is not treating New Media the same way that the Mainstream Media (MSM).  How will Norelli finally treat the new citizen oriented media since the old media doesn't have the money to cover the Senate? And his title is "Investigative Reporter"!

Segment 4 - More on the Senate tomfoolery on Charter Schools - by capping the number of kids that can be enrolled in Charters - 935 kids now and the Senate budget capped it at 850 kids - a sop to the NEA but potentially losing LOTS of Federal dollars.  What ever happened to the Democrat mantra of "...but it's for the children!"  Once again, the Law of Unintended Consequences reign supreme!

More on the upcoming budget - is it really is a matter of over exuberant spending so as to create a financial crisis that ONLY a broadbased tax can "solve" since the Democrats REFUSE to cut spending (after a 17.5% raise last time, now a 12% additional rise)! Let's list all the new new "enhanced" fees and taxes.

Hour Two:

Think that the Budget hole is big - wait 'til you see the pension hole!  NH GOP Chair and former NH Governor Sununu comes on to discuss (and in disgust) what big Liberal Democrat money is going to do to the fiscal side in addition to the social side.  People are leaving NH - the traditional NH Advantage is under attack.  The Gov talks about all the new taxes - now try a ReFi tax on refinancing your home!  Most states are reducing their expenditures - the Dems are RAISING it!  Smoke and mirrors is THE function that the Dems are using to hide the deficit.  Dems are also giving the shaft to businesses - and they will start moving out of NH as well.

Democrat Gov Lynch cannot lead - even as he sounds like a Republican, he doesn't act like one.  The NH Dems that understood small Government and NH traditions like Gov. King are gone.  Did Lynch lie to the voters in order to get elected?  Think about his vote on the Gay Marriage bill.  There's lots of "nots" about Lynch.      Part 1  

Pension bomb soon to go off?  What's the problem and what is the financial fallout on the retirees and the taxpayers?  When Gov. Sununu left office, is was completely covered.  End of the '90s, a 150 million deficit (not too bad).  By 2007, it is $2.5 Billion! Now?  Almost impossible - bond statements from Nov. 2008 - it is now about $7 Billion!!!!!!  Compare it to the actual State budget.  Taxpayers, through the towns, are on the hook for 30-35%.  Lynch has only punted on the issue.          Part 2

 

Leslie Carbone comes on to talk about her latest book "Slaying Leviathan, The Moral Case for Tax Reform"She describes why the Federal Government is a Leviathan via the tax code and the willingness of politicians willing to use it for behavior modification and social engineering.  Tax code is used to socialize risk (if you work hard, we take your success away from you; if you make bad decisions, we'll give you money and support you) - the signals for good behavior have been muddled by Government intervention.

We have moved from a time when Government raised money to fund itself to a time to mandate behavioral changes but also running into the Law of Unintended Consequences (e.g., mortgages for those that cannot afford it - loose credit brought on the meltdown, welfare removes the incentive to improve one's lot, higher taxes may move Microsoft offshore).  The middle class is getting squeezed.  Part 1 

Is what is good for GM is good for America?  Leslie surprises the group - Government ownership of anything is not a good thing for America.  Problems - restrictive union work rules, silly CAFE standards, Right To Work laws?  Examples not to follow!  Big Business is not good - until it is owned by Big Government.  Too often, large policies are rushed through the process without thinking things all the way through and end up with suboptimal results (and sometimes really bad results).  This is the problem - crony capitalism (this time with the UAW getting the goodies).

Big Business in bed with Big Government is not free markets - it is political rent seeking and gaming the system.  We need to go back to "creative destruction" instead of politicians making decisions of winners and losers.             Part 2

 

SchlubCam:

Break 2     Segment 3     Break 3     Segment 4     Break 4     Break 5   

Guinta on the last three months: "Less choice. Less direction... Less opportunity"

Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta speaks to Hillsboro County Republicans at their Flag Day picnic in this video courtesy of Grant Bosse:

 

Sunday Reading

reading paper

Mr Obama, TEAR DOWN THESE WALLS! City walls, that is. From the London Times via Infowars.com:

Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic "shrink to survive" proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline.

The government looking at expanding a pioneering scheme in Flint, one of the poorest US cities, which involves razing entire districts and returning the land to nature. Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.

The radical experiment is the brainchild of Dan Kildee, treasurer of Genesee County, which includes Flint. Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.

Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes.

Wonder how much of this will ultimately get carried out via eminent domain? Oh, they say they won't force anybody out NOW --but who reall