blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
Rob Boyce Blog
Take Back Orford, NH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


RedHampshire
Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Sarah Palin blows opportunity to shine on national stage | Main | Notable Quote[s]: Interview with Mark Levin »

The only way the economy will rebound

Inflation dangers ahead?

Washington keeps looking for quick and easy ways to get the economy back on its feet and return us back to the good old days. Some Americans think we can shop our way back to happiness. At least that’s what Washington would have us believe. As such, our national government is now spending like never before, forgetting that we are running up our collective credit cards to the limit and that the tab will ultimately have to be paid. But never mind they say, it feels good for now – and some would have us believe we need all this “stuff” are buying.

Between the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve, Washington has committed well over $12.8 Trillion in new spending. The Europeans warned President Obama during this last round of G20 meetings that this is a dangerous course to take. The head of the European Union, which is always worried about inflation, w arned that the spending of the U.S. Government is taking us down “the road to hell.”  The French and the Germans have made similar warnings and have pressed for a repair to the regulatory system. Unfortunately, the Democratic Administration has brushed past these requests. While acknowledging that their arguments have merit, the Democrats called for even more stimulus spending.

One of the dangers of all this historically unprecedented spending is that it will spark a very dangerous new round of inflation. Never mind the spenders argue, before inflation can get started, we will pull the money out of the system. This of course sounds very much like the drug user who says that he is not hooked and can quit anytime. Washington does not work that way and never has; real spending cuts have rarely been seen. A brief history of the size of government as a percent of GDP shows that government never shrinks. At best, it plateaus from time to time.

Were this a run of the mill recession, where there was a mere imbalance in asset supply and demand, government spending might do the trick. But this is a deeper financial sector crisis that will require major structural changes.  No amount of spending will fix the structural problems in the economy. We may very well pump up the economy into a short term sugar high. But there is an underlying illness that very much needs tending, lest we set ourselves up for a repeat of 2008. In some w ays, the experience of the crash of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) in 1998 was, in effect, a dress rehearsal for this crisis - from which we learned nothing.

First and foremost,...

...the financial system will need to be repaired. There is almost certainly no going back to the old fashioned bank lending patterns. The capital markets will have to be stood up again – but they will need to be properly re-engineered to factor in what we have learned through this and other financial crises.

Overall, we will need to:
  • Work to end the nation’s macroeconomic imbalances, particularly the current account and government budget deficits.
  • Impose capital adequacy rules on all financial institutions. We inspect cars which travel our highways and insist they have insurance and safety inspections. Why not the banks    which use the public markets?
  • Restructure the rating agencies to prohibit the buyers of the ratings from “shopping” the agencies – all but bribing them for good ratings.
  • Impose minimum hold requirements on securitization transactions so that packagers have some “skin in the game” and hence better monitor the risks associated with investment portfolios.
  • Reorganize and streamline the financial regulators into one over arching organization
  • Improve international regulatory reporting since most large financial institutions are now heavily international.
  • Better compensate and incent regulators so that properly qualified and trained regulators can be attracted who understand the highly complex new finance.
  • Stagger out executive compensation plans to better tie them to real performance
  • Strengthen the role of corporate Board of Directors to prevent outlandish senior management compensation. These excessive compensation packages are nothing more than major inducements to squeeze out short term earnings at all costs.
These measures will help restore the financial markets to proper health and help prevent some of the excesses we have just suffered through. In the end, these measures will be critically important.

But there is also an urgent need to re-examine the core principals and implementation of proper governance. One of the most glaring reasons for this crisis has been the almost complete breakdown in the most basic functions of good governance – in both the pubic and the private sectors. We thought we knew better. But we now see that we need to go back to the drawing boards and re-examine the entire system that anchors our institutions.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/3572

Comments

Item 2, capital adequacy rules. Don't they already have that? I was under the impression that the basic problem is more how capital is defined. Instead of requiring a specific amount of cash, it was/is allowed to be "cash + insurance + other" and it was this relaxed definition that helped the meltdown. The final 2 items, if it's good for public corporations, it's also good for athletes. Lets tie their pay to real performance. Board of Directors, I thought part of their "job description" was to deal with/set executive compensation, so shouldn't they already be dealing with "what is excessive compensation"?
I think I can safely credit Israeli foreign policy with ruining my summer. If you're the empathic type - it's hard to go to the beach and swim in the sun while, several thousand miles beneath your feet, people are being killed en masse by people who should know better about how not to treat people - based on their own historical experience. Israel violated a ceasefire and launched a sustained assault on Gaza last Boxing Day while many of us were on our bach couches, sailing our boats, and favoring a stretched stomach. 1,400 people died from planes, tanks, bombs, missiles, and small arms. You can reread that last line again if you need to. These are events. And they happened. At the time, if any of us looked at the daily newspaper about the events then our own vague take-home from reading would be that the events were a religious squabble, fueled by some Islamic splinter group hell bent on global dominance. As in the past, the events would be explained to you minus any historical context and the conflict timeline would begin with some random act of Palestinian aggression – such as kidnapping a couple of soldiers or some loose use of ordinance. This aggression would be treated as discrete - almost as if it came from out of nowhere, unprovoked and unconnected to anything that had gone before. If you had read your newspaper at the time of the events, then you might have glanced at an advertisement from a group encouraging you to think of any media outlet that criticizes Israeli foreign policy as 'unbalanced' - before you flipped to the sports section to load up on info to exchange with your friends over a beer at today's bar-bee. If, at the time, you were only watching the news on TV then there's every chance that you could have missed the events completely, as the state and standards of local television news broadcasting have never been worse. If you were watching news coming from England and America on the internet, then you would have understood (even perhaps agreed with) the wisdom of bombing densely populated urban areas in response to such acts of aggression. If, however, you were watching news coming from other parts of the world on the internet - then you would have noticed something else entirely. You would have noticed news footage of chemical weapons being used on suburbs, cell phone videos of human body parts scattered along city streets as bombs fell, interviews with physicians discussing bizarre never-before-seen war wounds, and dead kids. Lots and lots of pictures of dead kids. Had you read some of the endless commentary and analysis available, you would have discovered that Israel was founded as a "Jewish state" in 1948 through the ethnic cleansing of Palestine's non-Jewish majority Arab population. You would have also learned that Israel has been maintained in existence only through Western support and constant use of violence to prevent the surviving indigenous population from exercising political rights within the country, or returning from forced exile. At this point, you may have even begun to suspect that your choice of news outlet determines your own opinion of the events.
Israel should have nuked everyone attacking it a long time ago. Israel didn't "take" the land, it was given to it by other countries. Israel didn't start anything with the other countries, they attacked Israel first. Talk about unbalanced, how about you go and actually read the real history, not the made up garbage?

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone