blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
Rob Boyce Blog
Take Back Orford, NH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


RedHampshire
Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Obama - refusing revenues and refusing to create jobs | Main | OUCH! Obama and the enviro-wackos really DO hate carbon! »

Obama: Government does own your income-hates the poor and sick too

Well, Obama is certainly showing that he believes that Government owns all your money and will allow you to keep only what it wants:

Obama is going to let the tax rate cuts from Bush rise at the end of 2010.  We knew that going into his Imperialism.  Now, there's more for details (details....really?  Finally?)

The other brewing battle will be over how to finance Mr. Obama's national health insurance plan that will significantly expand the cost of government. His budget calls for cuts in Medicare payments to hospitals, insurance plans that serve older Americans, and prescription payments under Medicaid that critics say will result in cutbacks in health care services and facilities.

So, if you are elderly and sick, President Obama is saying "it sucks to be you!"  So, you really want to depend on Government for your healthcare?

Back to actual income - not only are the rates going up, but the effective rate is going to go up because the "rich" are not going to be able to itemize like you and me:

To help further pay for his universal health care plan, his budget also calls for cutting various tax deductions for wealthier Americans, including charitable contributions, interest on home mortgages, local taxes and other deductible expenses for those who itemize.

So, if the rate is going up to 40% for the richest among us in a formal way, it will actually be higher because of the lesser deductions.  So much for being fair - why not fair for ALL, President Obama?  No, I'm not at that height of income, but I want to be there someday.  But if I'm going to continually get whacked, why do I want to sacrifice to do that?

And you know that "cap and trade" program that he is gong to implement for CO2 emissions (industries now; in search for revenue, how much you want to bet that WE will have to one day too?  Wait until Obama get around to doing the same for oxygen too!).

A note about lessening the charitable deductions - I bet that this will end up like the yacht tax.  Obama and his cronies are assuming, in their budget estimates, that people do not change their behavior.  They do, and will stop being the "Sugar Daddies" for lots of deserving (and not so deserving) charitable services.  While many will continue to give, it will be interesting to match the total amounts.  As Dr. Brooks has noted, when taxes go up, charitable giving goes down.

And why not - "the government is doing it!"

The Law of Unintended Consequences - charities will be going toes up....or running themselves to the government teat to survive. What you incentivize, you get more of.  What you demonize, you get less of.  The signal that Obama is sending is that charities don't deserve rich people's support.

Yes, Obama want government to control all.

 

 

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/3287

Comments

Ah, charitable donations. It's already changed my contribution behavior this year. My wife and I decided to make a list, we came up with local police and fire, NH state troopers, plus a couple of Veterans charities that we have donated to for at least 18 years. Oh and the Nashua Soup Kitchen gets some too. Everyone that gets money also gets "You are not going to call me again this year are you?" Everyone else gets the "Get it from Obama, he's got all my money" treatment. Fun when the other end starts to splutter and give me attitude like they are entitled to MY money. I think that will be the pattern showing up: people donating locally, where they see more of their dollar actually helping.
I share Dr. Moffets sentiment: Little Patient Empowerment President Obama's health care budget proposal is large but surprisingly unimaginative. It depends on old-fashioned, populist, "soak the rich" tax hikes combined with technocratic tinkering with administrative payment and new software in anticipation of program savings. It does very little to change America's flawed public and private third-party payment arrangements, where value is secured for "payers," not individual patients. If the President wants to affect real change—and secure value for individual patients rather than third party payers—he should take concrete steps to transfer direct control over health care dollars and decisions to individuals and families.

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone