blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Ankle Biting Pundits
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

Local Commentary


GilfordGrok
NH Insider
Pun Salad
Rob Boyce Blog
Drew Cline
New Hampshire Commentary
One Voice In Gilford
The Blogging Councilor
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance

RedState
Flat Creek Management
John Fund-Wall Street Journal
Face the State
Fort Hard Knox
Americans for Prosperity
American Princess
ARRA News Service
Mount Virtus
ILGOPnet
Stix
Wichita Liberty
Kansas Meadowlark
Louisiana Conservative
Maine Web Report
Mackinac Center
Outside Lansing
Gateway Pundit
Montana Politics
Muth’s Truths
Granite Grok
Mario Burgos
Thurber’s Thoughts
Oklahoma Political News Service
Tennessee Policy Institute
Leslie Carbone
Sound Politics
Real Debate Wisconsin
Haemet
Grizzly Groundswell
Sibby Online


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Gates Of Vienna
Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


NH Primary News Links
PolitickerNH
PorkBusters
Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Victory Caucus

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Captain's Quarters
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Junkyard Blog
Overlawyered
Politicaldoodle
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Political Chowder
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Presidential Campaign Sites

Last Man Standing


John McCain


Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« A hug in the doorway and then he was gone... | Main | "Dangerous." Indeed, and then some... »

Once again, Government distorts the health insurance marketplace

I keep saying the same thing over and over again, and Liberals just seem to look at me as if I had two heads sticking up above my shoulders (with nary a brain between them).  Problem is, they keep ignoring empirical evidence that, and much more often than they are willing to admit, it IS Government that is responsible for higher and higher healthcare costs.

Here in NH, a law was passed called Michelle's Law as a result of a young woman who was diagnosed with advanced cancer while in college full time.  The problem is that the policy was only in force while she was full time; a condition that turned out to be impossible to keep as her disease and treatment became quite debilitating. NH mandated that this could not happen in the future. The problem in setting policy due to single or rare incidents is that often, that policy decision is not optimal and is often at cross purposes to other rantings.

Like that of "healthcare costs too much".  Well, just in my home town, the result of this law is that it raised the insurance premiums of the municipal employees by $30,000 (and with 85 employees, that comes out to be around an additional $350 / employee. 

Thus, it could end up raising our property taxes as well as raising our own premiums - a double whack.

But will politicians take their own actions into account when it is time to rant, once again, that healthcare is too expensive?

Naw, because they keep doing that which raises the cost.  From OverLawyered:

Mental health “parity” insurance mandate
» by Walter Olson

This was the week that Congress passed and the President signed a new law requiring that most health insurers (if they cover mental health treatment at all) pay for lots and lots of talk therapy and addiction rehab the same way they pay for lots of angioplasties or appendectomies, in the name of “parity” and “nondiscrimination”. Very optimistically — it won’t be Congress writing the checks — the ten-year cost is projected at only $3.4 billion. (Judith Graham, “Triage”/Chicago Tribune, Oct. 3). Next week lawmakers will go back to complaining that health insurance has become prohibitively expensive and that much of the population is priced out of buying it altogether. Mickey Kaus remembers where we’ve seen this sort of feel-good short-circuiting of underwriting standards before (Oct. 2).

I can promise you, the cost will not be just $3.4 billion.

Shades of what we just went through with this mortgage fiasco - politicians trying to be "feel good, saviors of the millions", who seemingly have NO idea of the economic consequences of their actions, will be making things WORSE - not better.

And for those of you that will now want to heap burning coals on my head for being mean and heartless, how about the sufferers who have just been priced out of the market?  Trust me, our politicians have no compassion on them...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2696

Comments

were you referring to a brain between your shoulders or between the Liberals? Saw an ad for Hodes that used this law as a hook. First thing that popped into my mind was "how much extra would it have cost to carry her on the policy?" My experience has been that health plans have price points for individual, indvidual plus spouse, individual and family (with no limit on how many kids are covered under family) and yes once a kid a 18, they have to be a full time student to be covered under that same rate, but a person can buy insurance for just about anything, it boils down to how much are they willing to pay. Of course if we had universal health care, it would be free, right? And "...could end up raising...", should probably read "...will end up raising..." :)

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone