blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
Rob Boyce Blog
Take Back Orford, NH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research

Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


RedHampshire
Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Americans for Prosperity - Defending the American Dream | Main | Update to the Obama devotees who want to arrest you »

More on why the bull's eye should be on politicians and not on capitalism

UPDATE TO INSTAPUNDIT READERS:  thanks for coming by!  I am just overwrought (but not surprised) by the actions of our professional political class.  They must truly believe that they are protected by the Enterprise's shields....and the Klingon invisibility shield....

And thanks to you, Glenn!

============

Put under PLAIN STUPIDITY instead of PLAIN POLITICS. 

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

Politician: deliberately trying to get more graft by the same tactics over and over

Senator Dodd (D-Conn)  (remember, the guy who got special mortgage treatment?) has tried the same tired "hide the pork" albeit in some "not cute" terms.  Glenn from Instapundit had it right:

You know, it would be easier for me to believe this was a crisis, if the people in charge were acting like it was a crisis, instead of just an opportunity for graft. Then again, to some of these people, everything is just an opportunity for graft.

This is in reference to his link to Jim at the Volokh Conspiracy:

I have read Dodd’s proposed statute and in some respects, it is far worse than has been reported. Senator Dodd has placed a loophole in the bill that is explicitly designed to siphon off tens or hundreds of billions of dollars to the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Magnet Fund even if there are no net profits in the $700 billion venture.
Here is the provision that has already been widely noted:
d) TRANSFER OF A PERCENTAGE OF PROFITS.-

(1) DEPOSITS.-Not less than 20 percent of any profit realized on the sale of each troubled asset purchased under this Act shall be deposited as provided in paragraph (2).

(2) USE OF DEPOSITS.-Of the amount referred to in paragraph (1)-

(A) 65 percent shall be deposited into the Housing Trust Fund established under section 1338 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Regulatory Reform Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4568); and

(B) 35 percent shall be deposited into the Capital Magnet Fund established under section 1339 of that Act (12 U.S.C. 4569).

(3) REMAINDER DEPOSITED IN THE TREASURY.-All amounts remaining after payments under paragraph (1) shall be paid into the General Fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public debt.
The biggest problem here is that the 20% is not taken from net profits, but rather from any profit in the sale of each and every individual troubled asset.

[snip]

I was mildly in favor of the bailout until I read Dodd's proposed statute. The way that the statute is drafted is so tricky and its definition of profit is so unsophisticated and nonsensical that the statute smells more of graft than of an honest attempt to solve the financial crisis. We are moving from failed "crony capitalism" to failed "crony community organizing."

And this is why Congress is half the approval rating of President Bush (lower than third-hand used car salesmen, or lawyers).  This is why I'm glad that "quick is not good" is carrying the day. Here we are, at the so called "worst financial flop since the Depression" and the long term politicians are STILL being politicians instead of leaders.

So tell me again: why should I trust my government that is out to bury me?  And why do we need (or want) professional politicians?

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2660

Comments

Here's the thing I want to know. We're in this mess because of the Community Reinvestment Act, and the regulations issued by the HHS under Andrew Cuomo, that encouraged (or required, depending on how you look at it) to make mortgage loans to non-credit-worthy people. So my question is - have the CRA and HHS regulations been changed? I haven't heard anything to suggest that they have.
And do you want these same people in charge of your health care?
"The only distinctly criminal class in America..." that's our career politicians (apologies to Sam Clemens). This plan of distressed asset purchase and later resale is full of opportunities for political mischief regarding the pricing of the assets and from whom/to whom they are traded. This is ripe for graft. And no, I do not trust that strictly principled people with only the interest of the taxPAYERS at heart will be managing the portfolio. The 20 percent of the public that cares about such things as preserving the republic really do want 'change we can believe in'. That change would involve firing all the current crop of senators and congressmen with more than two terms in office. Send 'em home!
I was wondering by what means they would find to divert funds to these account in the event - no, I should say - given the fact that there is no possible way that there will be a "profit" from this exercise in stupidity. Now I know.
The American Communities Fund (ACF) unit of Fannie Mae--set up to take advantage of the CRA for the benefit of political machines--was the central cesspool of it all. FInd a few projects nearest to you and do the research. Just be ready to puke.
This is a quick progression of the CRA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5tZc8oH--o Can't we get rid of that contradictory term "crony capitalism"? Isn't it really "crony fascism"?
Congrats on getting linked on instapundit!

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone