blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Ankle Biting Pundits
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

Local Commentary


GilfordGrok
NH Insider
Pun Salad
Rob Boyce Blog
Drew Cline
New Hampshire Commentary
Laconia's Purse
One Voice In Gilford
The Blogging Councilor
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers
Epping Residents for Principled Government
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market and Limited Government


Sam Adams Alliance>

RedState
Flat Creek Management
John Fund-Wall Street Journal
Face the State
Fort Hard Knox
Americans for Prosperity
American Princess
ARRA News Service
Mount Virtus
ILGOPnet
Stix
Wichita Liberty
Kansas Meadowlark
Louisiana Conservative
Maine Web Report
Mackinac Center
Outside Lansing
Gateway Pundit
Montana Politics
Muth’s Truths
Granite Grok
Mario Burgos
Thurber’s Thoughts
Oklahoma Political News Service
Tennessee Policy Institute
Leslie Carbone
Sound Politics
Real Debate Wisconsin
Haemet
Grizzly Groundswell
Sibby Online


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Gates Of Vienna
Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Our Friend Pat's Townhall columns
Liz Mair
NH Primary News Links
PolitickerNH
PorkBusters
Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Victory Caucus

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science
US Senate Comm. on Environ. - Public Works

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Captain's Quarters
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Junkyard Blog
Overlawyered
Politicaldoodle
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr (radio)
Political Chowder(TV)
The Rush Limbaugh Show (radio)

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Presidential Campaign Sites

Last Man Standing


John McCain


Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Friday Humor - Novel idea - advertising for taxes | Main | McCain for the troops before. For the troops now. Obama? Depends who wants to know... but really, he's NEVER been for the troops. Not then. Not now. »

"Safe" risky behavior? What's maddening is that I'm among the enablers. So are you.

More thoughts on the “Teen Family Planning” poster found pinned to the bulletin board in the Gilford, NH Post Office. That would be the one enticing teens to seek various “services” that cater to continued sexual carelessness and promiscuity:

Teen Family Planning

For those that missed my point, let me just say that while I feel that there are alternatives that caring adults should employ to dissuade kids from engaging in such behavior, in the end, I would not dare to step into a family’s private, personal business, other than to put forth my opinion as to what I believe to be right. If some misguided parent or grandparent wishes to encourage their own flesh and blood to participate in risky activities, so be it. It is NOT their right, however, to encourage others to do so. It may be their belief that society must enable the “safe” practice of bad behavior, but I disagree.

While certain individuals would, given their way, seek to deny myself and others the chance to speak our minds, I have no plans of stopping. The busybodies and purveyors of “services” for wayward teens do so in the name of “society.” Guess what? I’m a member of society too, and have a different point of view. Last time I checked, this is America and that is something to which I am entitled, should I choose.

Just because a segment of today’s youth might come from broken homes or other severe familial situations, it does not mean that society cannot try to steer them onto the right path in life. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that the cycle of abuse, poverty, and other types of “normal” life-destroying actions is extremely difficult to break away from. When a child (in many instances of yet another child) grows up knowing little to nothing else other than what he or she has been witnessing, the chances are good that they will seek to emulate what to them is “normal.” It is precisely because of that type of situation that society must not waver in promoting what is good in an open and never ending fashion. Such children must get positive messages and influences from someplace, if not from the home. And yes, they must understand that, rather than getting a pass for making bad choices, there are instead consequences.

“Oh but Doug, that’s so mean! The scarlet letter went away a long time ago!”

Please don’t misunderstand-- I’m not lacking in compassion, but I think that we have a growing problem precisely because of what we are doing as a society. Look at what’s happening in Gloucester, MA. There are a large number of that town’s high school students that have become pregnant.

 

When I first heard the news reporting on this particular subject, it was under the banner of how that high school would have to expand its day care nursery for the new babies when born. Hello? How about if those with child stay home and raise those babies? Isn’t school for learning? Maybe if their peers were able to see actual and REAL consequences, they might make better choices, lest they end up in the same boat.

Remember, up until the Sixties generation grew up and took over, such problems were dealt with by the family—whether immediate, or extended. It is since the growth of the “helping hand” of government along with the attendant “social services industrial complex” that we have witnessed the rise and expansion of teenage troubles. When you study the record, a direct correlation can be drawn between the breakdown of the family and the rise of “services” provided by the all-knowing “experts.” Who can convince me that we are not subsidizing bad behavior? When all consequences of risk are removed, why wouldn’t that be the result?

The bottom line is this: I do not feel that I am obligated to pay for “services” provided to children that which I vehemently disagree. Yes, I am pro-life. Yes, I believe that the unborn are innocent and that their termination is murder, no matter what the circumstances of the conception. When a minor child seeks “services” from some quasi-governmental agency, all the while looking to hide that fact from their parents or guardians, who pays? Whenever someone in my family needs some type of medical or pharmaceutical treatment, we must either pay, or show proof of insurance or other financial responsibility. When the minor child needs birth control, whether pre or post sexual activity, who pays? When a minor child receives an abortion without the consent of the parent, who pays? I truly don’t know the answer to that question, but I do know one thing-- it shouldn’t be me, but I’m afraid that somehow, some way, it is... Please God, forgive me!


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2396

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone