blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
Rob Boyce Blog
Take Back Orford, NH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


RedHampshire
Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« How bad is the foreclosure problem in NH? Really? | Main | Meet The New Press - Podcast for 7/12/08 »

Forget about parents. Teens need "someone with reason in a public health environment."

The following letter appeared in several local newspapers responding to my weekly Laconia Daily Sun column (page 4) where I ran the story about the teen clinic poster I found hanging in the local post office.

teen family planning

I was going to "fisk" the letter, but then decided that the informed GraniteGrok reader needs no such "help" with understanding the content of the writer's tome, which is nothing more than the classic liberal-view of the world. You know, the one where ALL children are having sex anyway, and ALL parents refrain from teaching their children about such things until it is too late and they become pregnant and the parent throws the child out, or worse... Yeah, that describes my childhood and my children's alright...

You'll note the classic liberal mantra that if we don't pay to prevent and abort before babies are born, we'll just have to pay more after, assuming that the child will automatically need "services" that, again thanks to the writer and his comrades, we'll have to provide. Like some good Nazi from a supposedly bygone era, he advocates killing those he deems undesirable in order to save money (many elderly in German nursing homes were euthanized for "the good of the Fatherland"). To the letter writer, teaching morality and fostering the difference between right and wrong, and applying consequences for actions doesn't enter into his worldview. Rather than seeking to change risky behavior, he simply enables it...

Lambert doesn’t know difference between contraception & abortion
To the editor,

Once again, Doug Lambert should stick to fabricating metal and not anatomy and physiology. His opine on Teen Family Planning is fraught with errors from a reproductive biology point of view.

While perusing the FBI’s Most Wanted List for Terrorists in the post office he was drawn to a poster — R.E.S.P.E.C.T., a positive teen program of the N.H. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) — that he takes issue with.

The valuable program, which is educational for teens (in four regions of N.H.) regarding their bodies and sexual health, is chided as being a program where “Lambert’s taxes” are funding abortion. Nowhere on the poster that Lambert lifted from the post office to scan for his Sun article, does it refer to “abortion.”

As I am a reproductive biologist (MS and Ph.D. in that fi eld and worked for J&J Ortho), Lambert should be re-educated as to what “emergency contraception” is all about. It is not abortion as he suggests. The “emergency contraception pill” is a pill that has nothing to do with a fetus, conceptus or implanted embryo. It prevents ovulation after “unprotected sex” and is administered the day or so after intercourse up to 72 hours. Since ovulation has not occurred, there should be no conceptus and the emergency pill prevents the egg from being released if a woman is mid-cycle. It is basically “a large dose of the daily oral contraceptive.” Does Lambert not like the birth control pill either?

 

Since the word “contra-ception” by definition is “preventing conception, (a fertilized ovum)” there is no fertilization, embryo or fetus to deal with. (On the rare occurrence of a fertilized egg occurring, due to “late administration” of the high dose contraceptive after three days, the uterus would be an unfavorable environment for the egg to implant).

His confusion is with what he “thinks” they are dispensing... RU 486, a hormonal abortion pill administered to “confirmed pregnancies” of eight weeks or less. That pill causes progesterone (needed to maintain pregnancy) to cease production and hence induces menses in early stages of pregnancy.

That is NOT what R.E.S.P.E.C.T. is referring to in the poster. RU 486 is not the same as the "emergency contraceptive ovulation-preventing pill.”

Aside from his unfamiliarity with reproduction/endocrinology, Lambert (himself) also wants to cease funding a program that has worked nationally for teen health. The mere fact that all DHHS Divisions in the U.S. provide education that prevents teen pregnancy, safe sex to those that participate in their teens and basic anatomy and physiology of an important bodily function, is commendable, in modern day public health issues. Schools and many parents don’t educate teens about their bodies or their reproductive system until it is too late. It’s often the last chapter in the biology book after the chapter on the gut/GI system.

Teen women have been known to experience their “fi rst menses” in school without knowing what to expect, or why they are bleeding. They think they are hemorrhaging to death. Diseases (STDs) are often discussed after one contracts the disease — a sad commentary for teens in which oral and anal sex has become prevalent to avoid pregnancy by normal intercourse routes. That results in other diseases. Sex education at the federal, state and local levels is amust and we must fund it since teens will have sex whether Lambert wants them to or not.

Since Lambert thinks his taxes are “funding abortion through Belknap/Merrimack County”, he is in error, at least with the program in the poster.

As for “parents being in the know,” when a teen needs help, many teens do not have optimal home environments when their parents find out that their child is having sex or worse, is pregnant or has gonorrhea or pubic lice. They may throw the young lady or young man out, chastise him/her as amoral, or even worse, physically/abusively respond to the news of a pregnancy. Teens with health issues that are reproductive or sexual in nature need to be confident that someone “with reason” in a public health environment will listen to them in their time of need. It is a public health issue should they have a STD occurrence, psychological issue or an unwanted pregnancy and a rare illegal home abortion. Teens that carry a child to term will surely need Medicaid or other local services to pay for deliveries or postpartum education and parental services, which are extensive and in the thousands of dollars. Perhaps Lambert wishes to pay for the later stages, i.e. young mother/child welfare. Preventing pregnancy with the R.E.S.P.E.C.T. program will actually save Lambert money. Contraception, as defined in the poster, “is not abortion” and is family planning as described.

I hope that he returns the poster to the Gilford P.O. since some teen may need the health services at this very moment and Lambert is doing the community a disservice with regard to his misinformation. Emotional rants of immorality and a conservative approach (basically non-funding)to teen reproductive healthcare is his inspiration for the latest article I suppose. Lambert needs to read the “teen literature” that is being disseminated by R.E.S.P.E.C.T. It would be a crash course for sure in biology. Maybe he could have the Doug’s Baby Day Care Center for Gilford teens in high school that were not given the “morning after contraceptive pill” when they needed it. We already, in the past, had a registered Brooks pharmacist that wouldn’t dispense a valid MD-written prescription for “that postcoital pill” a couple years back. Wonder where that young woman went after that trauma and public exposure?

Okay Doug, just what was your point? You are not paying taxes to murder babies! Why should Belknap County officials tolerate your ignorance on this subject?

Jack Polidoro

Laconia

Heh! Classic liberal... On top of everything else, he is apparently looking to the government to shut me up. Thankfully, I live in a country that still "tolerates" my exercise of free speech. Oh, and he is badly mistaken when he claims I removed the poster from the Post Office wall. The only thing I "took" was a picture...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2378

Comments

I would rather teens be educated about sex and how to have it safely rather then preech abstinence only(which is a load of bull). How can you blame a teen/child for becoming pregent when they were not properly educated about it in the first place? As for right of free speech it does have limits like no religion in public schools. I have run into many a Christian that support the seperation of church and state as long as it does not apply to them.

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone