blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Ankle Biting Pundits
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

Local Commentary


GilfordGrok
NH Insider
Pun Salad
Rob Boyce Blog
Drew Cline
New Hampshire Commentary
Laconia's Purse
One Voice In Gilford
The Blogging Councilor
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers
Epping Residents for Principled Government
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market and Limited Government


Sam Adams Alliance>

RedState
Flat Creek Management
John Fund-Wall Street Journal
Face the State
Fort Hard Knox
Americans for Prosperity
American Princess
ARRA News Service
Mount Virtus
ILGOPnet
Stix
Wichita Liberty
Kansas Meadowlark
Louisiana Conservative
Maine Web Report
Mackinac Center
Outside Lansing
Gateway Pundit
Montana Politics
Muth’s Truths
Granite Grok
Mario Burgos
Thurber’s Thoughts
Oklahoma Political News Service
Tennessee Policy Institute
Leslie Carbone
Sound Politics
Real Debate Wisconsin
Haemet
Grizzly Groundswell
Sibby Online


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Gates Of Vienna
Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Our Friend Pat's Townhall columns
Liz Mair
NH Primary News Links
PolitickerNH
PorkBusters
Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Victory Caucus

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science
US Senate Comm. on Environ. - Public Works

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Captain's Quarters
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Junkyard Blog
Overlawyered
Politicaldoodle
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr (radio)
Political Chowder(TV)
The Rush Limbaugh Show (radio)

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Presidential Campaign Sites

Last Man Standing


John McCain


Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Endangered species sighting: An elected Republican in the Granite State that actually seeks to implement core Republican principles. | Main | We've heard this all before..... »

Man, EITHER of them will rev up the $s!

Let's see, how can this be spun: $300 Billion dollars per year MORE in spending!

  • If you want government to take care of you (like a child), vote for one of these two free spenders
  • If you believe in being pandered to, either will fit the bill
  • You expect to be responsible for yourself, make decisions for yourself, and generally act grown up and be independent, vote for one of these two.

Oops, scratch the last one - neither Barack or Hillary believes in that we Americans are competent enough to be treated as adults - we all are victims one way or another (and given the marxist/socialist past employers/associates/friends, we now can understand why) and that government has to take care of us.

In fact, in their world, ONLY government can sustain our way of life and society. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I would never vote for either one of them.   

Anyways, here's the ticker of the tape of their promises thus far:

THE DEMOCRATIC presidential candidates have some big plans -- with big price tags attached. By our calculations, using figures supplied by the campaigns, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) has proposed new spending and tax breaks that would amount to almost $265 billion a year when fully implemented, while the initiatives proposed by Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) total nearly $333 billion. Those initiatives, which would be phased in over time and which the candidates say they have identified ways of funding, don't include billions of dollars more in one-time spending. 

In addition, both candidates would extend the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $250,000 a year, at an annual cost of another $140 billion in 2012, and renew the research tax credit ($9 billion). And both say they would take steps to prevent the alternative minimum tax from sweeping in additional taxpayers, adding $50 billion or so to the annual price tag. So the deficit -- even before any new spending -- would be that much deeper than it would have been if the tax cuts were permitted to expire.

Proposed initiatives (in billions) Clinton Obama
Health Care $110.0 $110.0
Education (including college tax credits) $32.0 $32.0
Tax cut for middle class and seniors $5.0 $80.0
Tax incentives for savings $20.0 $12.0
Expanded earned-income tax credits $6.0 $6.0
Increased research for health and science $32.0 $12.0
Veterans and military $5.0 $15.0
Foreign aid / fighting global disease $13.5 $25.0
Creating jobs $7.0 $3.5
Infrastructure and mass transit $7.7 $6.0
Assorted other $25.4 $30.3
Total $263.6 $331.8

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2155

Comments

Of course, Senator "stay the course" only wants to spend $341.7 million a day.

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone