NH Republican Party Chair not pleased with Fred Thompson.
.....
NH GOP Chair Fergus Cullen (GG file photo) Fred Thompson
.
Following up on yesterday's post about Fred Thompson's long, almost tiring flirtation with a run for the Republican nomination, it appears that he is finally ready to announce his official start next Thursday-- a day AFTER the next NH GOP Presidential debate Wednesday night. This has left more than one pundit and observer scratching their heads. Why not get in and start having a debate with his opponents a day earlier? Is he afraid of something? And what does this say about his attitude towards the Granite State's primary? It's no secret Fred has spent little to no money here, and put no campaign efforts into play to speak of, either.
.
This hasn't set too well with NH's Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen. In an interview with frequent MTNP radio show guest Jen Rubin posted at the American Spectator's AmSpecBlog, Cullen, apparently rather worked up over the whole chain of events, said
We try to communicate and we certainly told them of the debate. If I sound frustrated I am." He repeated that if Thompson changed his mind and became an official candidate before the debate the GOP would accommodate him. Cullen stated, "I do hope they reconsider." He continued that it appeared that Thompson "deliberately" timed his entry "to avoid participating in this event."
I think Fergus is spot-on about this. Jen further reports
Cullen explained that there is "genuine interest in his campaign but he doesn't seem serious." He then referred to the NH Union Leader article yesterday which he says "summed up" how voters in New Hampshire feel. He ended by saying that Thompson's failure to appear says to voters "we're not ready to talk issues substantively."
This taken on top of reports that Fred's few appearances have left attendees underwhelmed could combine to paint a picture of a candidate whose reality is different from the hype.
.
Here are a couple questions to ponder:
.
--Will Fred Thompson run a "non campaign" campaign here in NH? Like those choosing to "skip" the Ames Iowa poll?
.
--Are his actions, in general, harming NH's first in the nation primary status?
.
--Are we at a point in time yet where a "virtual" campaign can be conducted here in NH, or anywhere else?
--Are his actions, in general, harming NH's first in the nation primary status?
.
--Are we at a point in time yet where a "virtual" campaign can be conducted here in NH, or anywhere else?
.
NOTE: Jennifer will be with us on MTNP radio today to talk about this...




Comments
Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2007 10:44 AM
Posted by: Winghunter | September 1, 2007 12:15 PM
Posted by: Paul | September 1, 2007 10:02 PM
Of course, it doesn't matter to you that he's still in the next SEVEN debates (eight if you include the one in Los Angeles on January 30th). It doesn't matter that next Wednesday he'd have to share 20-second sound bites with EIGHT other candidates, only maybe two of which are even serious contenders for the GOP nomination at this point.
There's a darned good reason Thompson waited until September 6th to declare. That's the absolute EARLIEST date he could declare and not have to report his exploratory or other money until the January 31st filing.
Here's how it works: by announcing on September 6th, he then has 15 days to formally declare his candidacy to the FEC. At that point (September 21st) he has 10 more days to officially register his campaign committee with the FEC. And that date is--anyone? anyone?--October 1st. After that date he's not required to file or submit disclosure papers until 1/31/08.
Bottom line--watch Leno on the 5th, the debate on the 6th, wait until a few more second-tier candidates drop out (like Paul, Huckabee, Hunter, Tancredo), and then tune in to the Florida GOP debate on the 17th, the debate in Hanover on the 27th, and if that's not good enough for you, then the one in Manchester on the 14th of October.
Frankly, I would have thought you and the gang would have seen through this. Fergus Cullen needs to go as the state GOP chair. His "leadership" is the reason why we have two Dem representatives, a Dem governor, and a Dem Legislature/Senate for the first time in 95 years. And the way he's going (and being played) this state is going to remain in Democrat hands for a LONG time.
Posted by: Randy | September 2, 2007 11:00 PM
Posted by: doug | September 2, 2007 11:52 PM
Posted by: doug | September 2, 2007 11:53 PM
You can put Fergus in the former category, and as for cynical old me, the UL most easily fits into the latter.
I think I fairly explained why he waited until this point to declare. There are other underlying reasons, I'm sure, but this seems like the most logical reason on its face. And like I also stated, there will be three opportunities (two in NH) for him to explain his programs and policies within the next six weeks. Again, the debate tomorrow is going to be more of the same sound bite construction and isn't really going to tell us anything about the candidates (unless Ron Paul decides to insert foot in mouth again.)
Posted by: Randy | September 3, 2007 11:51 AM
Posted by: doug | September 3, 2007 7:14 PM
Posted by: Randy | September 4, 2007 11:07 AM