blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
Rob Boyce Blog
Take Back Orford, NH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


RedHampshire
Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 30, 2007

Premature rumors of his demise? Maybe not. (premature, that is)

McCain Gilford 
McCain speaks in Gilford, NH (June 5th)
.
I have been thinking for a while that the illegal immigration position staked out by McCain was going to wipe out the accumulated good will built up among Republicans due to his strong stance on the war. With the unprecedented, intense uprising and clamor over the proposed deal raised by the formerly "silent majority" (thanks in no small part to the New Media) I figured that the Arizona Senator would certainly be vulnerable to a fair amount of blowback given his chosen position. While he made cogent arguments defending his point of view, it could not remedy the fact that, in the end, like President Bush, he was just plain wrong.
.
Following up with comments this week about campaign finance laws which he surely knew would further agitate conservatives still sore about McCain Feingold, the Senator's star has seemingly faded almost overnight. And now, we hear distant rumors of a dismal fundraising period just ending. It can't be good when one goes from the perceived frontrunner in a campaign, to denying rumors of an eminent departure. Says the Telegraph (UK):
Senator John McCain, once the Republican front-runner for the White House, has been forced to deny rumours that he is poised to drop out of the race because he is struggling to raise funds.
While I don't believe the Senator is yet to that point, given the Fred Thompson excitement, Mitt Romney's endless pile of campaign dough, and Rudy's continued strength among Republicans, these aren't good times for the McCain camp.

Meet The New Press radio today. Granite Grok hits the airwaves once again!

 

*****[UPDATE- Livestream Server is erratic]******
We are working on this. We apologize.
This week's broadcast version of the New Media brings an array of items for your consideration. As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here for instructions on how to connect and listen via livestream. (Podcasts here)
.
We have a very special guest with us this week-- Mr. Jorge Mesa Tejada of Hampstead, NH. Those active in NH politics and government know that Jorge has been a mentor to many activists seeking better and more accountable government at both the state and local levels. If you're on a budget committee or are constructing a public building somewhere, Jorge is the "go-to" guy for information and knowledge that will help you in your deliberations and planning.  Jorge is also a very proud LEGAL immigrant from Colombia. Unlike many of us who had the good fortune of being born here as an American, Jorge is a citizen by CHOICE. We'll talk about his past and how and why his family came to America. He will tell us why illegal immigration and an easy path to citizenship, jumping ahead of those who wait, devalues the meaning of the term "citizen." We'll also talk about the importance of English. This should be interesting conversation. We'll also talk with him about "design-build" versus the more traditional means of public building construction. Oh, and we'll find out his opinion on the secret ballot vote taken by the County Delegation to appoint the new Sheriff.
.
Also...
What a show! It all starts at 11AM EST today. Tune in if you're in Central NH at NewsTalk 1490AM WEMJ or live on the 'Net here...

 

Guns AND laptops - good combinations!

 

If I was in the military, that would be me! 

Whether you are in the military or not, you need to bring the tools to the task at hand.  In a gun fight, I'll want the mini-gun.  However, this is as much an information war as much as the ammo-needing one as the stage is world- and Internet-wide - it cannot be fought in just a single part of the real world as cyberwarfare is anytime and anyplace.

Let us not be so conservative in our ways that rigor mortis sets in and precludes us from waging the mission where ever it takes us and the means in which to wage it.

NH - they want to turn us into a sanctuary state?

Sanctuary map

I got a heads up from a loyal reader (H/T: Michael) that there is a bill in the NH house, HB 404, that would declare the entire state of NH to be a sanctuary state.  I have replicated the text of the bill after the jump (bolded is my emphasis).

This bill is being sponsored by Lilly Mesa, a Democrat.  I have sent her an email inviting her to discuss  her bill on Meet The New Press radio show.  At the time of this writing, she has indicated that she will come on Meet The New Press a week from today.

What this bill would mean is that no law enforcement agent - State, county, or local - could ask if a person "of suspicion" is here legally in the country.

As far as I know, there are several schools of thoughts on this:

  • Let's punish / embarrass the Feds by not enforcing immigration law at their level (hey, the Feds aren't enforcing the border and going after folks the way they should - we should not be doing their jobs.
  • This is an unfunded mandate to NH - if we aren't getting paid to do this, why should do your work?
  • Hey, illegal immigrants (er, undocumented migrants) are here only to make a better life for themselves - who are we to deny them?  And it is the Christian, humane thing to do!  No person is illegal, and there should not be borders that restrict people from getting a better life.  After all, it's a right, right?

The first is rather silly - a petty turf battle.  Frankly, the outcome of this is zip - the Feds haven't effectively  enforced our border since the last "comprehensive immigration reform" back in '86 when the problem was only 3-4 million illegals.  Who in their right mind would think that this line of action would actually work?  This attitude will only make things worse.

The second is merely a variation of the first - let's dig in our heels a bit more and yelp louder.  Empirical results are? The same - do nothing and nothing gets down.  Problem gets worse and festers, gets more expensive to solve later, but hey, who cares....it's somebody else's job!

Both of these are wrong - it takes the most fundamental tenet that has made this country the envy of the world and throws it in with the other garbarge that illegals leave on our southern border as they tresspass. 

I have come to recognize that more and more, people believe that it is only the "professionals" that are supposed to do one thing or another.  They are the ones that are trained for a given job or responsibility - get out of the way and let them do it.  The problem here is that there are generally not enough of the "professionals" to do the jobs right. And I have observed that as government becomes larger and larger, this compartmentalization only increases as well.

In this area, the rule of law, I believe that we all, even as "mere" citizens, have the moral obligation to obey ALL laws.  Add to that, when we see that laws are being broken, we should let those in charge know when laws are being broken.  

The third is the real problem - it is wrong on a lot of different levels:

  • We lack the political will
  • We should not have sovereigty
  • Emotions overrule the law
  • We value other cultures more than our own
  • We refuse to face up to our problems and take the tough action

What kind of society do we become when it becomes common place to pick and choose what laws we will and will not obey?  Right now, it seems fine for our political leaders to ignore some when it is politically expediant or when it fits their philosophical needs. 

Let's consider all of them from a single perspective - we are supposed to be a country where the "rule of law" rules. Without this philosophy, without adherence to this most basic tenet of our democratic system (arising from protection of private ownership), we will become very much like the dysfunctional and corrupt governments from which many of these illegals come.

What happens when it is another set of laws that others wish to ignore?  What kind of leadership and authority figures do we represent to our youth - that laws don't matter?  Taken to the extreme, this leads to anarchy.

Hey, when does state law get to overrule federal law? When those in charge make that proclaimation and when those in charge of those "superior" or "overriding" remain silent.

 

This is a dangerous law...

 
The most important and highest purpose of government at any level is to protect its citizens.  At the national level, this is supposed to prevent our shores from being invaded - while not a military style invasion, when 1 in 10 workers of a foreign nation leave their nation and  illegally enter another, that is an invasion (we'll put aside the feckless irresponsiblity that has been committed in this area for now). 

States are the second barrier in protecting its citizens and while not military in outlook, it does provide protection via its law enforcement officers.  This law would make this all important mission of the state moot.  Ditto for the local police departments.

More in another post.... 

Of COURSE I'm going to comment.... 

 

HB 404-LOCAL – AS INTRODUCED

2007 SESSION

07-0991

09/01

HOUSE BILL 404-LOCAL

AN ACT prohibiting state and local law enforcement agencies from enforcing federal immigration laws.

SPONSORS: Rep. Mesa, Hills 17; Rep. Nord, Rock 1

COMMITTEE: Criminal Justice and Public Safety

ANALYSIS

This bill prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies from enforcing federal immigration laws.

In other words, the State of NH will allow lawbreakers, many of them criminals in their own countries (think gangs like MS-13) to roam among us, freely and without fear of deportation by ICE.  It codifies, at the State level, that breaking the law is fine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

07-0991

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Seven

AN ACT prohibiting state and local law enforcement agencies from enforcing federal immigration laws.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 New Chapter; Federal Immigration Laws. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 106-K the following new chapter:

CHAPTER 106-L

FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS

106-L:1 Prohibition on Enforcement by State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies. No law enforcement agency of the state or its political subdivision shall use state funds, equipment, personnel, or resources or accept or utilize federal funds, equipment, personnel, or resources for the purpose of:

That's right, let's make this stick!  Not only cannot State resources be used in any fashion, we cannot even notify the Feds.  

You know, many illegal immigrant rights groups hate and fear the Minutemen Project.  If this goes through, I bet that a number of chapters of law abiding citizens will indeed be formed.  And these folks will apply political pressure as well.

I. Detecting or apprehending persons whose only violation of law is that they are persons of foreign citizenship who have entered or are residing in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws in Title 8 of the United States Code.

Well, why stop there?  Why not give them a pass on identity theft as well?  I keep seeing stories of illegals without drivers licenses, without insurance, who disobey our road laws, and then take the lives of citizens in drunk accidents (at rates far higher than those of citizens). 

Should we excuse those?  How about the illegals that take up about 1/2 of prison beds in California alone?  Should we just free them too?

No.  Back to the maxim of "the rule of law".  It matters not a whit whether a law is big or smal in stature - break it and you are guilty.  

What this is asking is to turn our eyes to lawbreakers.  Do that, and others will begin to ignore other laws. 

II. Investigating or enforcing any violation of federal immigration laws in Title 8 of the United States Code.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2008.

 

This law is born of a belief that the rule of law can be ignored just because it fits their sense of "social justice" (one of the stupidest phrases that have ever been cooked up). 

It fits a belief that those that do not have a decent government (that will protect them and structure itself and its laws so as to better it's citizens) should be allowed to break another country's laws.   - It allows these do-gooders to disregard the long term ramifications as they bask in the short term glow of "feeling good" about their sense of morality and collective sense of being. 

It rewards those willing to steal goods, services, and jobs from those citizens that need them just as badly. 

This is a dangerous law, promulgated by those that do not believe in borders, that do not trust and embrace the spirit of the rule of law, but do believe the multiculturalism and emotions should hold sway over public policy.

and do not believe that our customs and our cultures should be put above those from others countries - non-assimilation.

The View? What's Wrong With People?

Rosie 

I used to watch The View once in awhile...well, until Rosie came on board and spouted her many over-the-top, completely implausible theories and became more and more obnoxious by the minute.

Read about possible Rosie replacements for the much-coveted empty spot on The View here.

Are people that starved for entertainment that they actually enjoy watching shock TV? Apparently so, since ratings on The View sky rocketed after Rosie joined it.

What is it that attracts people to this kind of TV? Is it that it takes their minds off of their otherwise mundane daily lives or what? Or, is it that many Americans just don't have any taste anymore?

Whether gay or straight, this woman was about the most repulsive person ever to be put on TV. Personally, I believe she suffers from some serious mental disorder way beyond her admitted bouts of depression. She is a very needy person who craves attention and her stunts just seem to get more insane as the days go by....her latest involving letting her 4-year old dress up with an ammo belt, military attire and  playing war then parading her picture on the internet for the world to see....even though it's well known supposedly that Rosie herself hates guns.

In typical fashion, Rosie blames Bush, the war in Iraq and images of soldiers streaming constantly from tv for the evolution of her daughter from princess to soldier. What's it all mean? I personally think that Rosie has a serious victim's mentality. It's never her fault for much of anything. It's all those other people out to get her because she's a lesbian, fat, a loud mouth, etc.

Sorry Rosie, you're not the victim here, but you did victimize your innocent child and use her to meet your sick needs. As a parent sometimes you have to make sure your vulnerable children watch age appropriate TV. Sometimes you even have to tell your children "no" and mean it and follow through and be consistent about things. It's a tough job and putting your children's needs first means not parading them on the internet dressed as a warrior because you yourselve are so starved for some media attention. 

But who's sicker ya think? Rosie or the people who actually enjoy watching her? There's just no accounting for some people's poor taste I guess. I hope they replace her with a sane person myself, but I'm guessing they'll go for another loud-mouth obnoxious pick. After all, it's about ratings not responsible TV or any semblance of actual healthy entertainment.

Oh, how I long for the days of innocent TV....The Donna Reed Show, Father Knows Best and Mr. Ed! Unfortunately instead many people put garbage in so is it any wonder that garbage comes out?

It says alot about Barbara Walters as well that she would pick Rosie in the first place. I've completely lost respect for Walters and while she had a somewhat stellar career as a real journalist, I can barely control my gag reflex when I see her anymore and I think she has forever sullied her reputation. Just like I do with The View, I change the channel when Walters comes on anything anymore. She has absolutely no credibility left for me....and yep, there's alot wrong with people today who substitute healthy TV to get their daily fix of shocking, obnoxious TV. 

June 29, 2007

New Belknap County Sheriff appointed in violation of NH law!

Secret Ballot
NH's Right-to Know Law, better known as RSA 91A, defines a "public proceeding" as

the transaction of any functions affecting any or all citizens of the state by any of the following:


    (a) The general court including executive sessions of committees; and including any advisory committee established by the general court;
    (b) The governor's council and the governor with the governor's council; including any advisory committee established by the governor by executive order or by the governor's council;
    (c) Any board or commission of any state agency or authority, including the board of trustees of the university system of New Hampshire and including any advisory committee established by such entities;
    (d) Any board, commission, agency or authority, OF ANY COUNTY, town, municipal corporation, school district, school administrative unit, charter school, or other political subdivision, or any committee, subcommittee or subordinate body thereof, or advisory committee thereto.
Tuesday's Citizen reported on the Belknap County delegation's appointment of Craig Wiggin to fill the remainder of the term of office left vacant by the resignation of Sheriff Daniel Collis.
On Monday members of the Belknap County Delegation voted, 10-4, to appoint Craig Wiggin of Meredith to serve as county sheriff until the term expires in December 2008.
NH RSA91-A:2, II states the following:
 II. All public proceedings shall be open to the public, and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meetings of those bodies or agencies. Except for town meetings, school district meetings and elections, no vote while in open session may be taken by secret ballot.
Again, from the same article about the appointment of our new Sheriff in the Citizen:

A secret-ballot vote resulted in Wiggin being selected over David Nielsen, the former chief of police in Belmont.

A "secret ballot vote"? Uh-oh!

The new Belknap County Sheriff has been ILLEGALLY appointed to his new job. I am calling on the County Delegation, a majority of whom are Republicans, to conduct a revote in a legal fashion.

I contend that the Sheriff is not legally able to conduct his duties. We must fix this egregious error as soon as possible, lest clever defense lawyers use it to their clients' advantage down the road.

What is wrong with these Republicans? Several members of the county delegation are people some might call the "leaders" within the Granite State GOP- including Mike Whalley and Fran Wendleboe. How could they allow such a blatant violation of the people's right to know occur? How can a person we elect to "represent" us (the people) cast a secret vote on our behalf?

****[UPDATE]**** Fran Wendleboe was NOT in attendance at this meeting.**

 

Friday Humor - A short joke

This morning I rear-ended a car at some light while not really paying
attention.

Anyway the fella who was driving got out...and he was a dwarf!

He said "I'm not happy"

I said "Well, which one are you then?"

 

(H/T: Sue)

June 28, 2007

Amnesty Bill update

UPDATE: 

Well, Senator Gregg has his statement ready to go:

WASHINGTON– U.S. Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) today made the following statement regarding today’s cloture vote on the immigration bill. 

 U.S. Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) stated, “The immigration situation in this country is a mess and this bill, which was a work in progress, was our last opportunity in the foreseeable future to take the action necessary to fix this acute problem.

Bullcrap....the only thing that would make that statement true is a lack of political will.  Frankly, the only thing that has to be done to "fix" this problem is if our political leaders had HAD the political will to make sure that the CURRENT laws had been enforced....and Senator Gregg has been around long enough to have helped out. 

It is critical that we get control of our borders, and as a result of language that I included in my amendment, this bill would have dramatically increased the number of border patrol agents and detention beds, and expanded the fencing at the Southern border at a level that would allow us to gain control there.

Fine and dandy.....why cannot he take that now-boilerplate and submit that as a brand new bill?  Is there a rule that says once words have been used, they are automatically unusable in the future (oh wait, they just TRIED that!)? 

 “In addition, we need a functioning guest worker program that allows people to come here and work in jobs that Americans are not available to do, without becoming U.S. citizens.

I only have to bring up the Swift meatpacking plants where illegals were rousted to prove this straw man toast.  THE NEXT DAY, legal American workers were lining up to apply....and the plants were forced to pay higher wages to boot (notice: higher wages - didja get the clue?). 

We also need an employer ID system that makes it clear that when an employee is hired, he or she is here legally.

 Tell you what....start fining (we're talking BIG fines) businesses that break the laws like the illegals they employ, and this will start to be a non-problem.  Make them big enough to bite into profit margins and presto!  Problem gone.

Jail time wouldn't hurt either.....in terms of years, not days. 

Also critical, this legislation would have moved our immigration system forward to encourage capable and highly trained individuals to come to America and contribute to strengthening our economy and culture.  Each of these issues was taken up and addressed in this bill.

We already have that in our current laws.....just stop letting people wade across the Rio Grande and the percentages will flip to the highly educated and skilled workers.


 “That said, I would have opposed the bill as currently drafted because it still had some serious flaws, and it had a long way to go before it was in an acceptable form that could have been passed.  I was hopeful that we could continue to work to make improvements to this bill and move this important debate forward through the amendment process.  However, this approach is no longer available and we will need to find other means to secure our borders and create a workable immigration system.” 

This is the most egregious part - "I was for this war before I was against it....er, against it...for it...".   Even if Senator Sununu was personally in favor of this bill, at least he had the courage of his political convictions to vote straight through.  I'd also say the same for McCain and Graham (although they are both DESPERATELY wrong on this issue, IMHO).

Stand up, take it like a man, and stop the flip-flopping....it makes you sound like Senator Kerry. 

 

========================= 

Well, this battle is over, but the war is probably not.  The vote for cloture (to close off debate) failed.  With that, Majority Leader Reid has said he will pull the bill.  The shamnesty is dead.....for now.

How did our Senators from NH vote?  Well, here's the complete list, but for Gregg and Sununu:

Senator Gregg (R-NH)      Yea

Senator Sununu (R-NH)   Nay

Translation - Sununu effectively voted to kill the bill.  Gregg voted to keep the amnesty bill alive.

 

Our motto at the 'Grok is to spank them when they're wrong and thank 'em when they're right.  Thus:

THANK YOU SENATOR SUNUNU!!!!!

Now, where's that paddle.....

Note:  I found it amusing that the Senate phone system crashed from all of the incoming calls.  I tried calling Gregg's office a couple of times, then switched to NH offices....I had to call three of his offices before I got through.  I was polite (no need to be otherwise) and told the lady who answered that I would appreciate the Senator to vote to kill the bill.  I asked if he announced his decision (this was about a half hour before the vote) and she said that he had not told them what he was going to do.

I'm quite sure that we'll talk about this on Meet The New Press this Saturday - consider this an open invitation to both Senators Gregg and Sununu to call in (or, better yet, come to the studio) for the show!

 

Complete list, last name alphabetical order, after the jump

Alphabetical by Senator Name

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Allard (R-CO), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Bayh (D-IN), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brown (D-OH), Nay
Brownback (R-KS), Nay
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Coleman (R-MN), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dole (R-NC), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Graham (R-SC), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Not Voting
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Martinez (R-FL), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Obama (D-IL), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Smith (R-OR), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Nay
Sununu (R-NH), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Nay
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Voinovich (R-OH), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Nay
Webb (D-VA), Nay
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea

What a deal!

 

Highway workers
 
.
Next time you feel bad for those poor state employees toiling away at their difficult jobs with little to no thanks or appreciation from the public, take heart in knowing that they will at least be getting a fairly decent raise. 10% in two years.
.
"Oh but Doug, the poor workers are going to (gasp!) pay a portion of their own health insurance." Really? Before you start shedding tears for these oppressed persons, consider some details. The Citizen has some facts:
Under the proposal, employees would pay $25 per pay period -$650 a year-for health coverage. The fee would rise to $30 per pay period-or $780 a year -in 2009.
.
Co-payments to visit most specialists would double to $20 in 2009, but remain at $10 for regular office visits. Preventive care visits would continue to have no copay.
.
Other provisions include:

_Caps maximum out-of-pocket expenses for office visits at $500 per individual and $1,000 per family.

_ Caps maximum out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs at $500 per individual and $1,000 per family. Prescription copays would not change.

_ Increases the maximum dental benefit from $1,000 to $1,200 per year.

_ Adds adult orthodontia.

_ Eliminates the 20 percent copay on dental x-rays.

_ Covers state employees under Michelle's Law, which ensures that seriously ill college students continue to receive coverage, even if they cannot maintain a full-time student status.

_ Increases sick leave credits at retirement.

_ Gives employees a right to request a flexible or alternative work schedule.

_ Allows employees to use up to 15 days of sick leave per year to care for a family member -an increase of 10 days.
Now really, while the headline reads that employees will now contribute, the tradeoff is a pretty sweet deal. $650 per year- just over 50 bucks a month- for health insurance? That's not bad at all-- especially when a basic health insurance plan costs in the neighborhood of six grand at a minimum these days, and doesn't have the sweet add-ons as noted above.
.
Oh, and my "favorite" part of the deal:  

The agreement also adds domestic partner benefits for state employees.

At least it isn't limited to only homosexuals...
.
At least now when we hear how hard state workers work at doing things like burying hazardous waste in the ground, we know thay will be well compensated...

 

 

Shamnesty Update

Illegals crossing border
No Ellis Island for these folks...
.
Our buddy John Hawkins of RightWingNews has a good source inside the Senate that is helping him provide the straight skinny on the many twists and turns of the fate of the illegal immigration "shamnesty" deal being worked on in the Senate.
[O]n Wednesday morning, the bill was out on the internet and bloggers started picking it apart and that morning around 10 AM, Reid pulled the bill so it could be re-drafted because he said there were mistakes in it. They spent almost the whole morning drafting it and when they re-released it, it was 400 pages long. That means that it's likely when the vote occurs tomorrow, not a single senator voting on the bill will have had an opportunity to actually read it. Reid's response to complaints about that has basically been, "Trust me." My source told me that the general response to that from the anti-amnesty senators has been something akin to, "Yeah, right."
You gotta admit that while there are those who are basically selling out US citizenship through their support of this "comprehensive" approach to "fixing" the porous borders, the Senators and other pols fighting against the measure have really fought a tough fight. I can't ever recall an issue that has apparently awakened the proverbial "sleeping dragon" like this has. I'm not sure I've ever witnessed a matter in which so many ordinary folks have so openly expressed their displeasure and anger like we see happening here. Between the Blogosphere, talk radio, and on the cable news channels, never has proposed legislation received an intense and thorough thrashing in such a short period of time.
.
The politicians thought they were pulling a fast one. Instead, they stuck their fingers in a hornet's nest. Next up: the so-called "fairness doctrine". What we are witnessing here is the full power of the New Media at work. 
.
Writes John Hawkins:
I asked him if the phone calls were still rolling in. He told me that there were so many calls coming in that most callers were getting busy signals and that it was absolute "pandemonium" in his boss' office today because the phones just never stopped ringing. So, make no mistake about it, the pressure, which was already relentless, has actually increased on these Senators over the last few days.
Send an email to NH Sen Judd Gregg, who, unlike Senator Sununu, voted to sell out our citizenship. Click here for the form. Better yet, give him a call at (202) 224-3324. Tell him to do the right thing for America and kill this sham now.
.
Power to the people! (the legal ones, that is...)
 
-Doug 
 

June 27, 2007

Teen nails Hodes to the Wall!

You go girl! It seems Rep. Hodes may have met his match in a 16-year old's insistence on answering her question:

"So you favor a woman's right to kill her unborn child?" 

Read the story first, click here, and then let's talk about things, ok?

So, did Hodes answer the yes or no question with a yes or no....uh, no, he answered in his politically correct way which is really not to answer it at all now is it?

Courtney Carter of Hudson, a student at Alvirne High School, has got chutzpah for sure. I like that in a kid, or anyone really, who obviously came well prepared and wasn't afraid to challenge Hodes' answer to the question about his stance on abortion:

"not in favor of abortion, but strongly supports a woman's right to choose. I think abortion ought to be safe, legal and rare".

Yeah, this gal is one of the new media that Hodes discussed...the emergence of new media as a force in political campaigns...

Carter said she felt compelled to press Hodes on his answer and she did but she added,

"I don't really think he answered it that well."

Me neither Ms. Carter...plus he tried to turn the tables on Carter, unsuccessfully however, by stating:

"I understand the deep emotions, and I think what you've done is a very good job of trying to frame the question in an inflammatory way"

Duh! It's lil' Ms. Carter's fault that Hodes can't answer a simple yes or no question?

Well, he just doesn't see it in the same way he states. Hey, Mr. Hodes, killling the unborn human is killing the unborn human isn't it? If it isn't killed doesn't it grow up to be a human not a chicken?

I mean, come on now Hodes, you're gonna have to explain yourself a bit better than that you just don't see it the same way! If you can't answer a question from a 16 year old and then want to blame her for your inability to answer, you may be in the wrong line of work...oh, wait a minute...you're a politician....so derrrrr....I guess you are in the right line of work to avoid answering questions. Too bad though that you're obviously not a statesman but a mere politician.

I'm guessing Hodes may just change his stance on meeting with the new media since it appears he really doesn't want to answer yes or no questions, but he wants to keep spinning his yarns which are much more acceptable to the old left-wing media since they too are more concerned about appearing to be politically correct rather than being honest!

Hey, Courtney, keep up the good work! Skip, Doug & Patrick: Should we get this kid on Meet the New Press or blogging on the 'Grok? 3 men, 1 woman and 1 gutsy teen might be a good balance. Yep, I'd say that the new media is a force in political campaigns since we insist on answers rather than the same ole rhetoric. May the force be with you!

 

-Judy 

Who are these guys?

Really- they're just a couple of shlubs in Central NH...
.
Click here
.
[NOTE: I fought to control school costs while improving quality--And don't take the last sentence as my final position. Everything is subject to change at this point in the game--Doug]
 
 
-Doug
 

Healthcare as politics

 

Hospital sign

 

The only word for the current crop of Democratic Presidential candidates - pandering.

Why?  Among other things, they are almost all promising voters universal healthcare.  People understand that healthcare is not cheap.  It can bankrupt a family in a flash.  A simple appendectomy can be $10,000 in an afternoon.  To those not well off, this can be a very powerful message - something for nothing - I wonder if it hits them that someone ALWAYS has to pay.

For the socialists in our society, this is just another nail in the coffin, enforcing a 'we are in this all together' mentality.  What they forget is that while groups of people have historically banded together in this country for specific problems, those collective acts generally do not last for long.  After all, this nation was not built on a collective idealism but on individuals acting to better themselves and their families - hardly socialistic tendancies to be claimed. 

And even if universal healthcare is put into practice, it will be a losing proposition - the only question is how long will it take before it fails AFTER it becomes a money pit.  All one has to do is look at Canada and the UK to see how that model performs.  At its best, it can be described as "rationed healthcare" where patients, even those critically ill, can wait months for necessary procedures and the most advanced technologies and medications are not available at any price. Why?  When something is touted as "free" (when it really is not), demand for it goes up - why not, it doesn't cost ME anything!.  At some point, those in charge realize that the real costs cannot be contained and there are few options available - raise the "income" of the program via fees and taxes or cut the benefits (which causes howls from the "deprived").

Once again, government distorts (or further distorts) the marketplace.  Once that happens, competition is stifled and innovation dries up.  Result?  Things get worse.

Here in the States, we only have to look at what Tennessee did with what was TennCare - basically universal care for its older and poorer citizens.  While it ran well in the beginning, the typical things happened - costs spiraled, the managed providers started to fail, the lawyers got into the act, and so on.  While it still exists, it started to fail badly enough that it became the focus of the governor's campaign race.  Even now, efforts are on-going to salvage things and to save face.

The problem now is that Colorado and California political and advocacy elites are trying to push this collective answer to what should be a free market and individual choice.  However, being what they are, politicians are going to show that they are "concerned" and have "good ideas" and that they will "solve" the problem.  As with many things of this nature, they would be wrong.

At least the Dems are being honest - we will tax everyone to give a little to all.  Make no mistake, it may sound good, it may look great in the beginning, but it will be a slow motion disaster.  No, the current level of care (and we can argue all day long about the quality of it) will go down if these are put into place.

More insidious are those Republicans that are touting programs that provide "private insurance for all" as an alternative to universal healthcare.  I include both the Governator Arnold and Governor Romney in this category. 

In my opinion, when something is made mandatory by government that has an identifiable cost associated with it, it is a tax from a philosophical standpoint (albeit, perhaps not a legal one as the money does not go to government coffers).  Certainly car insurance lies in this category - in most states this is mandatory and is punishable for its lack with fines and/or jail time.  It therefore is money that must be spent by individuals that might not ordinarily be spent.  Foolishly if not, but it is no longer an individual's decision.

Governor Romney's stab at this, sometimes referred to as MassCare or RomneyCare, incorporates this notion of mandated expenditures by individuals upon pain of legal retribution. It mandates that all people be covered by medical insurance. 

If you are financially capable, you are legally responsible to have a policy and can only use an HMO plan. This could cost you up to $3,600 / year if you earn $29,000.  And a high deductible no-frills policy can only be obtained by those 27 years old and younger - older than than, fork it over.  Those that are 300% of the poverty level or below will be subsidized by everyone else.

It is even rougher on businesses - all employers with 10 or more employees have to provide financial coverage.  If they do not offer insurance, they will have to pay a fee of $299 / employee / year to the State.  That might sound like a great deal until you consider that these same businesses will then be responsible for ALL financial obligations of its employees and their families with no caps. 

Talk about a business killer!  Why in the world would a small to mid sized company want to put themselves at so much risk?  As a former business owner in a business with extremely low margins (day care), I would have closed up shop immediately as I could neither afford health insurance for my employees (go ahead, double or triple the cost to your customers and see what happens!) or afford that kind of financial risk 

Now that it has started, the obvious has started to become obvious!  What was touted as being low cost is rapidly turning out to much higher - try doubling or tripling the early estimates that were used to sell it (gee, what a surprise!).

When it all comes down to it, RomneyCare, CoCare, and GovernatorCare (which I believe will kill off small buisnesses in CA), are universal healthcare dressed up in other garb.  The Dem versions of universal healthcare will be even worse - instead of universal healthcare, I predict that long term, it will bring the same universal misery that we now see in scloretic Europe and that did hardly anything in the Communists regimes except keep the appararatchiks well.

That's the problem.  What's the solution?  In the grand scheme of things, make people more responsible for their own healthcare costs.  The main thing that most people worry about are the big high ticket items that people believe that are necessary - that's what insurance should be.  More minor things - out of pocket (trust me, my family's on-going medical costs would cost a pretty penny every month) expenses should be taken care of at the individual basis.

This is what Health Savings Accounts with high deductible insurance plans can do.  The next part is where the two things have to intersect - the Internet and the publishing of health costs.  The first is easy and I bet there are people chomping at the bit to provide sites to for the next bit - the costs.

The philosophy among healthcare providers, in general, is not to make well known their costs.  This will need to change in order for patients to be good consumers. And that, in a free marketplace, will bring down the constant rise in medical costs. 

But getting to that point, publicly available costs and consumers making decisions with that information, will take time and take a lot of arm twisting.  The current environment is not conducive to this new way of approaching care, thus the problem of change management on a massive scale will be needed.  Newt is leaning in this direction and I believe that it will, if accomplished, will make for higher quality care at lower cost. 

After all, competition (what Republicans should always be trumpeting!) is good - more competition is even better for consumers.

Not universal healthcare - or it's shame work-a-likes.

 

The Senate Amnesty Bill

You know, just a little while ago the Republicans excoriated the Democrats over porking up the supplemental Defense bill (mostly for the Global War on Terror, especially Iraq).  They decried that votes were bought via $24 Billion worth of pork (some of which is being brought home by our Dem congressional Reps Hodes and Shea-Porter - both of which vigorously defend their actions).

Pork is pork, whether for vote buying or for secret / hidden earmarks.

Question for you - this Senate bill was made $4.4 Billion more expensive just to get cloture to pass. 

Does the phrase 'glass houses" have any ring for the amnesty favoring Republican Senators?  Go ahead, YOU try to convince people that the Republican Party is any better than the Dems after this vote purchasing fiasco in the making. 

Are we ordinary citizens going to get any more value out of this higher expense?  Hardly - the wall that was passed into law still is not built (not even much of an effort being done) and the only thing that is value added is 370 extra pages of amendments being handled in a most un-Senate type way.

No, once again the Republicans, including our own Senator Gregg, have let we common folks down.  Almost instant protection from deportation, no back taxes due to the IRS, cheaper tuition at state universities than I can get, less qualification for Social Security than I (16 quarters for them vs 40 for me), the ability to cross the borders without repercussions and I would be denied if I don't have the proper paperwork - what's not to like if you are an illegal alien?

And the national GOP and its leaders cannot understand why we at the local level are boiling mad?  Mark my words - there is going to be a heavy fine to be paid - both monetary and voting wise - by Republicans for a long time to come.  I, along with many, will not lift a finget to help those that hurt us. 

Primary time here in NH should be an interesting time.....

June 26, 2007

Calling all NH Fred Heads

Well, I guess that the "uncampaign" of Fred Thompson is going to venture a tad more into the physical world (gotta tell you, that come back to Michael Moore while smoking the cigar immediately comes to mind - more please!).

 

Like the rest of the hopefuls, Fred will be "in state" soon.  He'll be at the Senate Republican VictoryPAC Reception in Bedford this Thursday at 5:15pm at the Wayfarer Convention Center.  Guess there's a private meet-and-greet first, then thrown open a bit more at a reception at the same spot - Fred will be yakking.

Wonder if he's flying in the red pickup.....wish I could be there....

 

Gov. Mike Huckabee Bloggers conference

Here are my rough notes - I will be editing them a bit later on to "polish them up".  Also, there may be a link to the actual audio a bit later on as well on the Huckabee site.

Impressions - well spoken, conducted himself in a low key manner, but pretty much addressed all the questions asked of him.  I would have rather not had the two gentlemen, Dr. James Robinson and Michael Farris, join him so as to allow more time for blogger questions, but hey, not my call.

Hopefully, the 'Grok will be invited to more and more of these.

Again, these are raw notes:

=================================== 

Huckabee blogger conference  Tues  6/26

Huckabee started the conference by thanked the number of folks on the line.  "One of the most important information sources" for electing a president - bloggers will be seen as the most important points in the campain history

Intro'd Dr. James Robinson - ministry that serves poor all over the world

Michael Farris - Pres of Patrick Henry college (Christian) and HomeShool Legal Defense Fund.

Huckabee had his own kids in public school but was first to have a homeschooler on the Ark Board of Ed.  Believes in parental choice for their kids education.

Dr. James Robinson comments
    Talked about his TV show and the channels it is on.  Importance of time tested principles that have kept people free and made us great nation.  Our next leader must be of conviction and character, must understand what has made us great and be willing to protect those principles.  He has to be able to deal with the media and get his message out to the people.  He believes that Huckabee is that person.  He captured most of the black vote and was voted as Governor 4 times as a Republican in a Democratic state.

Mike Ferris
    Would have said pretty much the same things.  Is the most able communicator he has met in his life - period (even in his long period of time in DC).  Need a person who has principles, and believes that Huckabee is the most principled person running.  Pointed out (in the post Nixon era) that when Republicans run as conservatives, they win; moderates running as moderates do not.  He believes the front runners are moderates, not true conservatives.  Huckabee is a Reagan-like conservative.

Questions
(announcer is garbling the blogger names and where they blog - hard to hear what she is saying)

Jeff - PoliticsInAlabama.com:  lost him

Rath of  Above the Hook.com
- in 2000 McCain throttled Bush in NH and lost later.  Huckabee, you are moving up 5-6 points - what do you atribute this to?  THe debates - folks had the chance to listen to real ideas.  He is not just a fiscal conservative but also a social one.  Still trying to raise money - see web site.

Robert Bluey of RedState
- in the last 2 weeks - immigration bill - anything that makes it better?  Folks are not seeing the primary focus - border security.  Folks see that aliens that are already here and now will be earning what they are already getting from us (it should be the other way around - earn entry and then receive the benefits).  We are not addressing the physical border - they come in without the paperwork that we have to show just to get on a plane - there is nothing to show.  He is not supporting the bill.  For $2K the IRS will forgive you for your forgiven for the last two years for aliens in this bill - how come citizens cannot get this deal?

Jeff - PoliticsInAlabama:  back - what should we be expecting from your campaign finance results - how will you stack up against the others.  He says he will be happy, better than expected, but not the numbers that the front runners will have.  He will be competing int he Iowa straw poll.  Q2 will be better than Q1, and Q3 should be better than Q2.  He is going for the folks and not for the MSM.

    Followup - McCain et al are pulling out of the Iowa caucas - will that hurt them?  He thinks that they were not going to do well, shows their unwillingness to play the game of organizing.  Not sure of the result.

Skip of GraniteGrok - What do you think of the FairTax and what would you do as President to get it implemented and throwing away the IRS income tax?
We have to do something drastic ("an evangelical support of the FairTax" - small joke intended and taken as such).  Present system taxes productivity - the very thing we need for our economy needs to grow (more you work, the better you do).  It is so complicated now that the IRS doesn't even understand the rules.  It costs corporations about $500 billion/year  just to comply - what would happen if all that money was freed up to better the buisness processes, how would that do in use of R&D?  Would free up capital for our shores instead of going off-shore.

If we through the FairTax out into Congress, it will not pass - too many lobbyistswill fight against it.  It has to be a grassroots  effort - get them to talk to the Reps / Senators and threaten them. 

Steve from Colorado for Huckabee - energy independance plan - total energy by end of your second term - what is the key of your plan and how do we hold you accountable?  So far, we talk about it and nothing is been done.  FairTax helps, as it does away with tax stratagies and can concentrate on energy strategies.  We should drill for more and get things like wind power "freed up".  Conservation has to be a part of it, have folks do simple things.  Come up with an incentive program for companies like tax free et al (huh?  FairTax here?)  to get them acting.  We can do this if we REALLY set it is a REAL policy

MichiganRedNeck
(missed her name) - Education - People going to Food Banks get flour, sugar, et al, and the folks ask "what do I do with this"?  Should we be better educating our folks in simple Home Ec?
Mike stumbled through his answer, saying that he really didn't have the expertise to do so and passed it back to Huckabee.  He went back to education of "caught not taught" and talked about the change in education in the character education courses (manners, ettiquiete, etc.).  Results - less discipline problems as structure and order appeared (contrasted that with gangs offering a place "to be" and structure).

Dope(s) of the Week. A Two-fer.

 

Monkeys see no evil

 

NH DOT officials checking internal compliance & performance.
.
This week the judges here at GraniteGrok have decided to award our prestigious "Dope of the Week Award" to a pair of richly deserving recipients-- both former NH DOT commisars commisioners. On the state DOT workers dumping hazardous materials on job sites and state land scandal, came this from the Concord Monitor:
Former Commission Carol Murray, who led the department for seven years, says sometimes workers' focus to get the job done means they turn a blind eye to environmental violations. Former Commissioner Leon Kenison says he remembers ordering workers to stop illegal dumping, only to be ignored.
Ms. Murray, please... stop! I'm laughing so hard I nearly threw my back out! Have you ever considered a career as a comedienne? And you, Mr. Kenison, you were so concerned you ordered the lawbreakers to stop breaking the law... and they didn't stop, and you were in charge, so then you did WHAT? [insert cricket-chirps here]

 

Laughing Guys
 
 
By Doug 

 

June 25, 2007

NHDOT Chiefs: It was the "culture" that made 'em do it...

 

pumping gas

 

MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) -- Current and former commissioners of the state Department of Transportation say culture is the underlying cause behind years of illegal dumping of hazardous waste.
.
[snip]
.
...interim commission Charles O'Leary has called the actions "stupid and "lazy."
Damn right it was the "culture." (Lazy and stupid? You be the judge.) The "culture" that many of us who have questioned government and its actions on our behalf for many years have always known existed. The "culture" that has created a government full of workers who hold this as their credo:

"I don't give a *bleep*. I'm just waiting to retire..."

That is why the answer is not giving them more money. Or power. Or responsibility. Fire the whole bridge crew and give all the work to private contractors. Period. And then look at every last department, employee, boss, peon, whoever. If government made as it's goal the elimination of waste and increasing its effectiveness, while following the same rules and laws as people in the "real world," the state would be an even better place to live.

Other news related to this matter now reveals that all abutters to contaminated sites have been given a clean bill of health by inspectors... from the state. Wow! It took less than two weeks to determine that they, the government through their actions, have harmed nobody. There. The state says so. Doesn't everybody feel better now?

 blind leading the blind

 

By Doug 

Carol-Shea Pompous

By Judy

We can only hope that the citizens of NH wake up and realize what's going on in NH by the next election. Read this article for a bit of background information by clicking here.

I've tried to think beyond the immediate crises in our state government, some of which is outlined in the recent article, and contemplate why Ms. Shea-Pompous would take the liberal left-wing stance she has on major, and even minor, issues.

Carol is playing with the big dogs in Washington with virtually no experience. I believe she has been swept up and used by the more-experienced dems probably because she has so little political experience, virtually no common sense and she's easy to manipulate. Her "power" has likely gone to her head, and she may actually believe she has a future in politics. I think her political career is already over even though she may currently be unaware of that sobering fact. However, her actions still do not dismiss her personal responsibility to the voters of NH no matter how easily she's been controlled by ill-meaning, self-serving politicians.

No doubt "promises" have been made to her that her fellow dems will stick by her and support her in the next election. Personally, I think she's been easily used in her ignorance as a puppet and will be abandoned by her party faster than poop slides through a goose, and she'll be thrown under the bus and sacrificed once the dems realize that, in deed, they have been commiting political suicide faster than a speeding bullet here in NH.

Yes, I agree with Mr. Cullen that buyer's remorse hopefully has set in for those who voted democrat in the last election.

I've known many educated idiots in my life. Generally, they are enveloped in the dilutional smoke of insense of their own smartiness. But more often than not, they can't seem to connect to their own common sense and some seem to be void of it altogether. While I've been told Carol is smart, unfortunately she seems to lack that vital connection to common sense and, I believe, the fate of her future political career has already been sealed but she won't get the kiss but more likely a swift kick in the butt out the door.

Nowhere is this political suicide agenda more apparent and disastrous to the dems than in voting down parental notification and passing civil union legislation faster than raging rapids after a heavy rain storm. It's also probably not a good thing to completely ignore, not to mention piss off, the large baby boomer generation by turning ones back on our courageous military. We're a very patriotic bunch and since most 18-24 year olds who are generally more liberal don't vote and we do...we will not soon forget her voting record in the next election.

I had the distinct pleasure to attend the "Some Gave Some, Some Gave All" support the troops rally in Laconia last Saturday along with many of the Blue and Gold Star Mothers, veterans and current military personnel. While speaking with one of the Gold Star Moms and her hubby later, they were telling me that there were over 500 people at their son's funeral, and that they were overwhelmed by the show of support and comfort received from people they didn't even know. Sadly, a soldier from the same town who died during the unpopular Vietnam war had only six people at his funeral.

Those of us who lived through Vietnam and especially our vets will not ever, ever, ever let our current military come home to be spit on and called atrocious names by the current peaceniks and abandoned by the likes of Carol Shea-Pompous. We will not allow her to be completely disrespectful and show such dishonor to our troops. Yes, she has already paid for her misdeeds, but the realization won't catch up with her until the next vote. I believe she will be forced to come out of her denial soon and hopefully will drown in her own tears eventually once the light comes on if it ever does.

The arrogant Rep. Paul Hodes and our governor will suffer a similar fate as Ms. Shea-Pompous. We need confident leaders not followers in our government. Perhaps a military person who better understands honor and commitment will step up and show the intellectually ignorant what true leadership and common sense are all about. I know they won't leave any man behind like Ms. Pompous and the other dems have so easily done.

Yep, I'm sure many of you who voted for these clowns can say "This isn't what I thought I was voting for." Unfortuantely, you'll still have to pay higher taxes and more regulation by bigger government just like the rest of us who fortunatelly used some common sense in the voting booth.

No, I believe Ms. Shea-Pompous is the one who has suffered from the gravitational pull of more-experienced and calculated democrats. Ahh, the sweet smell of freedom from the dems is a pleasant odor to my nostrils already.

Monday Poll

As we find ourselves rapidly approaching those dog days of summer, it becomes more difficult to worry about presidential politics. With swimming pools and beaches, horsehoes, friends, parties and BBQs, who really wants to listen to some presidential wannabee go on and on? Even political junkies like me tend to have things to do other than politics at times in the summer. That being said, I thought it might be a good time to get a sense of where the GraniteGrok readers are at this point in the campaign. Maybe get a sense of who's up, who's down, etc...
.
The Republicans...
.

If you were voting in the Republican primary today, who would you vote for?
Sam Brownback
Jim Gilmore
Rudy Giuliani
Newt Gingrich
Mike Huckabee
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Ron Paul
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Fred Thompson
Tommy Thompson
  
pollcode.com free polls

.

The Democrats

.

If you were voting in the Democrat primary today, who would you vote for
Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Christopher Dodd
John Edwards
Al Gore
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
  
pollcode.com free polls

.

[UPDATE*** OOPS- MY Bad! I forgot to add "none of the above" to the lists. If that's your choice, just say so in the "comments" section-- Doug]

 

By Doug 

Ron Paul and on line polls

UPDATE:

THAT was quick!  And I bet there will be more..... 

http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=8443.255

================================= 

One of the buzz items that keeps floating around is how the heck Ron Paul barely gets recognition in the regular media polls and then skunks everyone else in the online polls.

Here's part of the reason:  http://wiki.ronpaulpresshub.com/index.php?title=Polls

Now, it doesn't take a genius to have figured out that there was a general clearinghouse for this kind of info - it was just amusing to see (from my referrals list) where at least one source was located.  And maybe I'm just behind the curve here.  But still....

Gee, and the Grannys from my earlier post (listen to the audio interview) were saying it was all the MSM's fault......and yes, I took flack from some Ron Paul supporters for posting it along with the Truther stuff that came with it.....that it was my responsibility, under the guise of being fair, to post Ron Paul's stances.

No, it isn't, and no, I'm not. 

File under: amusing

June 24, 2007

Meet The New Press Podcasts - 6/23/07

Meet The New Press
Radio at the speed of the Blogosphere!
 
(A radio show by bloggers about the goings on in blogosphere)
WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 11am-1pm (EDT)
Streaming Live!

Podcasts

To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to save the file for you.


Week of 06/23/07


                                       
Hour 1 here                                                Hour 2 - here

     Hour 1

           Intro - Doug's Global Warming Initiative, Free State Project, "Some gave some,
                    Some gave all" troop rally field update by Giselle,

           Interview - Ian Bernard, Free Talk Live            Part 1     Part 2               
                    FreeTalkLive.com / FreeTalkLive.com   FreeKeene.com   Free State Project, Porcupine
                    Festival at Gunstock, Government Regulation, Free market vs Government
                    regulation, Moving all for a political/philosophy purpose, choice for schools -
                    private or government

           Discussion - Why are men not volunteering anymore?
 

     Hour 2

           More on volunteerism 

           Office of the President - he is the President of us all!

           Doug's Letter to the Gilford Selectmen          Part 1           Part 2          Part 3
                    Energy conservation, mandatory busing / no SUV pickup, Town fleet management,   
                    geo-thermal heating/cooling systems, forming the Energy Committee, Students
                    walking means fighting childhood obesity, Windmills on the local mountains, trash to                     energy, photvoltaics, Free market solutions,

            Global Cooling?      Part 1    Wrap up (with Doug's bad sliderule joke)

            Update on the Gilford Police Facility

 

SchlubCam vids: Apologies, just partials as I got distracted!

            Doug, Chan, and Skip talking about the "Some gave some, Some gave all" troop rally
             Free State Project - Ian Bernard of Free Talk Radio    Part 1    Part 2

 

Photo Gallery

 

 

Click here for the Meet The New Press photo gallery

Yeah, but they paid a big "fine"...

money sack
 

Following up on my earlier post about having local government implement energy (money) saving practices that reduce global-warming inducing emissions, I wanted to further expand on the point about the Carbon Coalition's admonishment to the private sector. On Tuesday, they posted a piece
on their blog that stated
Holding our local businesses and corporations accountable for their greenhouse gas emissions is a necessary step in combating global warming.
In what has become the standard routine here in modern America, forces behind whatever happens to be the environmental “cause du jour” always end up attacking private business. Using the power of government regulation, they smother and stifle activities great and small, often causing added costs that ultimately get born by the consumer. No matter though, because it’s all in the name of saving the planet from the ravages caused by man.
.
I say it’s time to take a hard look at the government doing the regulating to see how THEY are doing in the battle to save the environment. Unfortunately, even a cursory glance reveals many areas where they drop the ball. Last week we found out that the NH DOT bridge repair crew has been illegally dumping hazardous materials on state land and jobsites since the early Eighties. Who was minding the store? While the government was putting people in jail for filling puddles now called “wetlands” and other similar egregious acts, state employees were getting paid to dump and bury waste wherever they saw fit. Did anybody go to jail? No. Oh sure, a couple of flunkies might lose their jobs, but others involved now retired will get away scott-free, with no worries other than how to spend all that pension money they get from the NH Retirement System funded with tax dollars. And the guy in charge ten years ago when it was discovered to be happening (the first time) is in charge again today! (DOT Commisioner O'Leary) Probaby he'll get to the bottom of this, right?
.
As the Carbon Coalition calls for holding “local businesses and corporations accountable” in the battle for Earth’s survival, my suggestion to them is to add to that list local governments and non-profits. Why shouldn’t these entities be held to this same standard of accountability? Isn’t it time that the government does something real to fight the scourge of climate change, other than charging higher taxes on the energy Joe and Jane Sixpack have no choice but to use?  As a matter of fact, doing so might be the easiest way to attain the greatest impact in the fight against global warming.
.
Oh, and if you're worried about the crimes committed against the environment by the DOT, don't fret- they really did get punished. The NH DOT paid a "fine" to the NH DES of over 300 grand...
.
In an unrelated story, did you know that the NHDOT is nearly broke and is looking to raise the state's gas tax and maybe raising the toll fees a little? In the June 14th Union Leader, Tom Fahey reported the looming problem:
CONCORD – It will take 35 years and $4.5 billion to complete the state's 10-year plan to construct and repair bridges and highways, acting Transportation Commissioner Charles O'Leary said yesterday.
.
Higher worldwide demand for oil, steel and concrete has created what he said is an unprecedented, three-year inflation rate of 45 percent in the construction industry.

The solution is a combination of fewer grand projects, more emphasis on maintenance and increases in turnpike tolls and the gas tax, he said.

My point? Why the hell should we be happy that the DOT is paying a "fine"? Why do I have to pay for the crimes of the DOT?

pumping gas 

June 23, 2007

After the debate-- The top three remain the top three. For now..

Rudy Giuliani    McCain in Gilford

 Rudy Giuliani after NH houseparty                        John McCain in Gilford, NH

.
Watching Tuesday’s presidential debate-- it was clear to me that the two so-called “frontrunners” were indeed the winners. While several of the “second-tier” candidates certainly had their moments, Giuliani and McCain were in command of the evening. Each, in differing styles, demonstrated why they have garnered the support they continue to enjoy. As I have often noted, whether we like to admit it or not, politics in the modern era is 5% about the issues and 95% perception. While there is no question that the topics and answers are important, it is the WAY that they are delivered that moves the vast majority of people to vote in a particular way-- especially for president.
.
As I look to presidential race of ‘08, I find myself with that majority, focusing on the perception part of the equation. “Gasp! But Doug, I thought you were a deep-thinking, issues-orientated kind of guy? What-- you care more about looks and stuff than substance?!”
.
After six years of a complete lack of any leadership ability by President Bush (other than the fateful days following September 11th) the country needs a heavy dose of someone who can stand up and sound and act and look presidential- in the eyes of both the Nation and the world. What good is being great on issues if you can’t motivate people to follow? George W. Bush is right on many matters important to conservatives, but it doesn’t mean squat because nobody takes much of what he says or does with a whole lot of seriousness these days. Don’t get me wrong, I still care about the things I care about, but the leadership component trumps everything. In order to be a leader, you must be perceived as one. Think about that.
.
History tells us that democratic states cannot sustain war without the popular support of the citizenry. Obviously, during the normal waxing and waning of luck in warfare, there are times when maintaining such support is difficult. This is when a leader is needed to keep things together (Think Churchill or Lincoln). Otherwise, once lost, it cannot be regained. Unfortunately, we have come to one of those times. We are at war with an enemy that, as John McCain continually reminds us, if we stop fighting and “we have to withdraw, will follow us home.”
.
While I remain skeptical over the proposed illegal immigration deal being debated in the Senate, I begrudgingly must give McCain credit for standing up for his beliefs, and will, for now, take him at his word that he will continue to work on improving what he agrees is wrong with the proposed law. One reason I'm willing to do this is because his unabashed support for victory in the war is well-explained and much needed at this time. He was on his game during the debate Tuesday evening, reflecting much the same man we all saw right here in Gilford earlier in the day.
.
Rudy Giuliani continues to impress me.  While his answer on the abortion question certainly disappoints a fair number of pro-life people, I appreciate his candor on the subject, as opposed to saying what he thinks people might want to hear. Pandering only leads to future disappointment.
.
He also made excellent points about the war and plainly identified the flaw in the arguments made by the Democrats:
“the problem is that we see Iraq in a vacuum.  Iraq should not be seen in a vacuum.  Iraq is part of the overall terrorist war against the United States.  The problem the Democrats make is they're in denial.  That's why you hear things like you heard in the debate the other night, that, you know, Iran really isn't dangerous; it's 10 years away from nuclear weapons. 
.
 Iran is not 10 years away from nuclear weapons.  And the danger to us is not just missiles.  The danger to us is a state like Iran handing nuclear weapons over to terrorists. So it has to be seen in that light.”
His delivery during the debate contained a whiff of optimism, an air of strength, and an overall degree of confidence that one imagines an American president would possess. National Review's Rich Lowrey agrees with my overall assessment, while lamenting Giuliani's abortion position. He writes, of Rudy:
[H]e was quick, commanding, authoritative-sounding—altogether the Big Man on stage, projecting the image of the kind of guy you can trust during a time of war. He kept taking digs at Washington, burnishing his outsider credentials, and was frank and feisty in taking it to the enemy both metaphorical (the Dems, the media) and real (Islamic terrorism).
.
Overall, I would place Rudy in first, McCain second, with Romney pulling third. While he seems quite at ease in front of a large audience, his positions sound somewhat contrived to me.
 
Mit Romney in Laconia
Romney in Laconia
.
.
.
Of course, everything changes when Fred Thompson dives in. And Newt. Stay tuned...
 
 
Fred Thompson Newt Gingrich
 
 
BY DOUG 

 

TROOP RALLY IN LACONIA,NH TODAY!!!

Trrop Ralley 

 

It starts Now!

All Give Some. Some Gave All

American Legion
North on Route 106/ N. Main Street
Laconia, NH

Breakfast sponsored by the American Legion

Motorcycle Run

Walk with a Hero

Barbecue

Live Entertainment

Troop Rally

BY DOUG 

Radio at the speed of light? No, faster. At the speed of the Blogosphere!

MEET the NEW PRESS Today at 11am EST

Listen in Central NH on 1490 WEMJ, or on the Internet via livestream!
 
 
This week's broadcast version of the New Media brings an array of items for your consideration. As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here for instructions on how to connect and listen via livestream. (Podcasts here)
.
Once again this week we mix a fair amount of "local" in with the usual fare. While it may not be completely relevant to where you live, the stories will be familiar, no doubt. The politicians and bureacratic busybodies can be found everywhere!
BY DOUG 

June 22, 2007

Judy Paris has SSS

Yeah, I decided I'm the dope of the week having contracted SSS (Sudden Stupid Syndrome) as we call it here at the 'Grok.

While I try to save, save, save things, after writing a long post electing Roy Buckley, State Democratic Party Chair for the Dope, I somehow got rushed...maybe because I'm one of those quintessential multi-tasker people?...previewed my excellent post...trust me it was...I emailed Doug to see what he thought about adding a previous picture and he so very kindly tells me I don't have a post ready for publication.

Okay, so I just have to take responsibility and, at least for today, you can call me "Dope of the Week!" But, Buckley will probably be next week if I can reconstruct my thoughts so stay tuned. 

But with that take some good advice and save, save, save! Ya'll have a great weekend and thank a veteran for their service.

 

BY JUDY 

Nobody leans on Sharky's [Romney's?] machine...

 

Sharky: I'm gonna pull the chain on you, pal. And you wanna know why? 'Cause you're f*cking up my city. 'Cause you're walking all over people like you own them. And you wanna know the worst part? You're from out of state
I've been trying to step around this story, at first thinking it to be much ado about nothing. You know- the story about Mitt Romney's personal bodyguard acting like an official officer of the law, issuing orders to a news reporter legally travelling a public road to stop. This was followed with a claim of "running" the hapless reporter's vehicle plates. Then I took the time to read a detailed account of how the events went down, which made me wonder. 
.
The BRAINSTER blog has a pretty good rundown of the chain of events. EyeOn08 goes nuclear, dropping the Watergate bomb:
I don’t even know what to make of this. It sounds like this wannabe cop is a wannabe Secret Service officer. Or maybe he wants to be Howard Hunt, of Nixon Plumber fame. And Romney is perfectly happy to feed this guys weird delusions, perhaps with Romney’s own?
Romney as Nixon? Ouch!
 
           Nixon
.
When you're running for president and you wake up and read headlines in the statewide newspaper and the main Granite State television station indicating the New Hampshire (first in the nation primary state) Attorney General is opening an investigation into your campaign tactics, it's not gonna be a good day. Whether it's an egregious crime or not might not even matter at this point. Employing someone acting like a goon pushing people around in public places in your name doesn't project the "man of the people" image voters look for in a president.
.
Oooh, that's gotta hurt, Sharky!
 

BY DOUG 

Can't these scientists make up their minds?

Update - Our friend Chan over at Weekend Pundit has a bit more on this.  It is worth a read!

===================== 

Sorry Doug, I am the contrarian in this discussion. From Instapundit

OH, GOOD, SOMETHING ELSE TO WORRY ABOUT:

Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest Schwabe solar cycle of the past two centuries, likely leading to unusually cool conditions on Earth. Beginning to plan for adaptation to such a cool period, one which may continue well beyond one 11-year cycle, as did the Little Ice Age, should be a priority for governments. It is global cooling, not warming, that is the major climate threat to the world.

So we'll either be roasting, or freezing. I guess either way, more insulation in my attic is a good idea.

While I think that there is global warming, I DO remember the dire warnings about global cooling back in the mid 1970's and how up in a stir folks got (although to be sure, not as much as they are now).  Frankly, cycles come, cycles go.  Cycles intersect with other natural cycles and things can look goofy for a few decades (not even an eyeblink in geological terms).

Humans adapt, be it cold or hot; that is what life is about: change and not static conditions.  

(tongue in cheek) -> Can't these PhDs get their story straight?  After all, look at all these folks without degrees or minimal degrees all a flutter that "the earth has a fever!  We're all going to die!"

Honey, where's my parka?

Skip in an Air Force Snorkel Parka 

Skip in an authentic 1970 Air Force Snorkal Parka; after all, it was in the 70's when we were told we were going to be in another Ice Age soon.....

(Cross posted at GilfordGrok.com)

 

"Like having a ghost for a father..."

As promised, here is another YouTube from last week's POW/MIA Freedom Ride & memorial dedication in Meredith, NH's Hesky Park. (See another here) This features moving words from Trish Burnett, daughter of Col. Sheldon Burnett, a Viet Nam ~ MIA. Col. Burnett’s remains were returned to N.H. in 2004. 
.
While I have long given thought to the plight of those who never came home from serving their country and their families, I had no real personal feel for the reality until hearing Trish. Her words are moving, brimming with pure honesty and love for this man who was "like having a ghost for a dad..." You might want to have a tissue or two handy as you watch. The video is ten minutes long, and includes an introduction by a member of Rolling Thunder, (who I will ID when I know).
 
YouTube Goes Here
 
.
Mentioned in the video: National League of Families, Rolling Thunder. Also, Northeast Network POW/MIA, Blue Star Mothers of NH. NH's current POW/MIAs here. Iraq War I & II here.

NEVER FORGET!

 
BY DOUG 

Friday Humor - use your eyes (er, imagination!)

We've been rather lax lately about putting up things that put smiles on our faces....been rather busy too!  Hope this helps to make up for it a tad....
 

A man's wife was rushed to the hospital unexpectedly, and asked her husband
to bring her some items from home including "comfortable underwear".
 
Worried he'd make the wrong choice, he asked, "But how will I know which
ones are comfortable?" 
 
She answered, "Hold them up and imagine me in them. If you smile, put
'em back!"

 

(H/T: Sue)

Agenda? Naw, not us!

So often I hear from the big name journalists that "we report the truth and only the truth".  That only a journalism degree and years of experience can allow one to objectively report on the goings on in the world.

Balderdash.  At the same time that they rail against citizen journalists and bloggers for our lack of the above, at least most bloggers readily admit their biases right up front instead of insisting that they are perfectly objective - unlike many journalists - like these! 

I am actually very surprised that journalists would investigate other journalists this way - telling secrets out of school?  I'm sorta glad that journalists are finally coming under the same microscope that they have applied to others - and I bet they don't like it!

See the list after the jump.

Add to it this story that outlines how the MSM forms a "template" and uses it to shape national opinion on certain topics - that is called lobbying and not what I consider "news".

Journalism: Last fall, when the jobless rate hit a five-year low of 4.4%, Vice President Cheney was asked by ABC's George Stephanopolous why the administration didn't get more credit for it. "Well," said Cheney, "you guys don't help."

So much for the understatement of 2006. Cheney, of course, was referring to the now-obvious fact that even when there's good news about the economy, it's played down — or turned upside down — by the mainstream media.

Coverage of that unemployment report, coming just before the congressional elections, was just one of many cases in point, as the Media Research Center (MRC) pointed out at the time.

ABC reported on the "exceptionally low" rate, as Stephanopolous described it — albeit 19 minutes into its evening newscast. But "CBS, and NBC to a lesser extent, spun the good news into bad," MRC observed. "Though wages had grown by 3.9% over the (previous) 12 months, CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric used the lower unemployment news as a segue to ask: 'But do the jobs out there pay enough? A big issue in the battle for Congress this year is how much the lowest-paid workers make.'

"Viewers then saw a full story on the plight of minimum wage workers and how raising it is 'resonating' with voters."

No wonder, said MRC, that an ABC News/Washington Post poll taken just before the election found more than half of Americans (53%) thought the economy was "not so good" or "poor."

Objective, huh?  Straight up the middle, eh? 

There are good, honest reporters out there (we are blessed with a few here in central NH!).  Wish it were so other places. 

Details for the political donations:

Television:

(D) ABC News, Mary Fulginiti, "Primetime" correspondent, Hollywood, Calif., $500 to Gov. Bill Richardson, Democratic presidential candidate, 2007. Before she joined ABC in November 2006, lawyer Fulginiti gave $6,000 to Democratic candidates.

ABC forbids political activity by journalists.

"A friend asked me to contribute" to Richardson, Fulginiti said. "This is not a reflection of my political views. Look, I've made a mistake here. I'm a legal analyst — this is all new to me. I have been politically active in the past. This is when I was just starting out at ABC. I was still thinking as a lawyer."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) ABC affiliate in Boston, WCVB, Sangita Chandra, producer, $250 to House candidate Jamie Wall, Democrat, Wisconsin, in April 2005.

Chandra is a producer for the nightly newsmagazine "Chronicle" and news and feature programs. She said she gave to the candidate in Wisconsin because of a personal connection. "He's one of my best friends. He's the only candidate I've donated to."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) ABC affiliate in Wichita, Susan Peters, anchor, $600 to America Coming Together in two donations in 2004 and 2005. She anchors the news at 5, 6 and 10 p.m. America Coming Together funded get-out-the-vote drives to defeat President Bush in 2004.

Peters didn't return calls.

KAKE news director David Grant said, "To be honest, I don't have an answer for you. Can I get back to you?" He didn't call back.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CBS News, Serena Altschul, contributing correspondent for "CBS Sunday Morning," $5,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in October 2004. She was a correspondent for CBS from 2003 to 2006.

A CBS spokeswoman said Altschul "did some checking with family members, and the contribution was in fact made in her name."

A year after this donation, CBS tightened its policy to forbid all political activity.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CBS News, producer, Edward H. Forgotson Jr., "CBS Sunday Morning," $1,000 in June 2006 to Patrick J. Kennedy, Democrat, the Rhode Island congressman and son of Sen. Ted Kennedy. The donation was made two weeks after Kennedy pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of prescription drugs in an accident on Capitol Hill.

A CBS spokesman said the network's policy was tightened in September 2006 to forbid contributions to political campaigns. Previously, there was a bit of wiggle room.

"My donation pre-dates the clarification of CBS News policy," Forgotson said. "I've made no contributions to any candidate or party since."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CBS affiliate in Boston, WBZ, Liz Walker, newsmagazine host, $1,000 to Women Senate 2006, which gave to Democratic candidates, in December 2005; $2,500 to Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton in January 2005; $250 to Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow in Michigan in March 2006; and $250 to Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat, in March 2006.

Walker did not return a phone call, but WBZ spokeswoman Ro Dooley Webster said that Walker was not in the news department when she made those contributions, though she has since returned to a news department role. Walker had been the station's anchor for 20 years but left in January 2005 to become host of the station's community affairs and opinion show. She made the contributions in 2005 and 2006, before returning to a news role, doing pieces for the newscast.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CBS affiliate in Los Angeles, KCBS, Claudia Bill, news writer, $250 to Democrat John Edwards in March 2007, and $500 to Democratic candidate Lois Capps in a House race in October 2003.

"I'm a news writer. I write copy for the anchors," Bill said. "What's written by the news writers is copy edited several times. I haven't covered any politics at all in this particular race. I made a donation as a private citizen, not as a member of CBS. If I were, say, Katy Couric, then you may have a different picture." She said she wasn't aware that CBS policy now forbids donations.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CBS affiliate in Memphis, WREG, Markova Reed, anchor of morning and noon news, $250 to Ed Stanton, a Democratic House candidate from Memphis, in January 2006.

Reed did not return calls. WREG's president and general manager, Ronald A. Walter, said, "Yes, we do restrict employees, journalists particularly, from engaging in political activity. We don't want people doing that. We feel that in this particular case it was an innocent mistake on her part, and we have handled it internally."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) CNN, Guy Raz, Jerusalem correspondent, now with NPR as defense correspondent, $500 to John Kerry in June 2004.

Raz donated to Kerry the same month he was embedded in Iraq with U.S. troops for CNN. He also covered reaction to Abu Ghraib and President Bush's policies in the Middle East. In 2006, he returned to NPR, and covers the Pentagon.

"Yes, I made the donation," Raz said in an e-mail. "At the time, I was a reporter with CNN International based out of London. I covered international news and European Union stories. I did not cover US news or politics."

Both CNN and NPR prohibit political activity by all journalists, no matter their assignment.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) CW affiliate in Chicago, WGN, Jay Congdon, news producer, $500 to Republican senatorial candidate Cynthia Thielen of Hawaii in October 2006.

Congdon did not return phone calls. The station's management would only confirm that he is employed.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) CW affiliate in Los Angeles, KTLA, Diana Chi, news writer, 19 contributions totaling $8,025 to the Republican National Committee from 2002 through 2006.

Chi did not return phone calls. Nor did the news director, Jeff Wald.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) Fox News Channel, Ann Stewart Banker, producer for Bill O'Reilly's "The O'Reilly Factor," $5,000 in June 2006 to Volunteer PAC, which gave to Republican candidates. Her father was once a campaign treasurer for former Republican Sen. Bill Frist of Tennessee.

Banker didn't return calls. A Fox News spokesman said donations are allowed.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fox News Channel, Codie Brooks, researcher for Brit Hume's "Special Report," $300 to Senate campaign of Harold Ford Jr., Tennessee Democrat, in March 2006, $200 more  in June, and $2,100 more in September.

Brooks, who said her family is friendly with Ford's, said she raised much of the $2,600 from friends — it wasn't her money alone. "A lot of Fox employees have contributed to Democratic candidates. I know I'm not the only one."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fox affiliate in Omaha, KPTM, Calvert Collins, reporter, $500 in October 2006 to Jim Esch, Democratic House candidate from Omaha. Esch lost to the Republican incumbent in November.

Collins says that her father made the campaign contribution. "I had told my dad that I was friends with this man. He said, 'Would you like me to make a donation?' I said, 'That's up to you, but don't do it in my name.'" She said her father also made a $2,000 contribution in her name to Kay Granger, Republican, Texas, in 2004, when Collins was a student in broadcast journalism at the University of Missouri-Columbia.

Collins also posted a photo of herself with the candidate on her Facebook page, with the note, "Vote for him Tuesday, Nov. 7!" After the photo was posted on a blog about Nebraska politics, a public Web site, she posted a reply:

"I would like to take a moment to set the record straight, Jim and I are friends, and nothing more. It is part of my job to build rapport with candidates and incumbents during election season. I have many friends in other campaigns... It is also important to note, I have NEVER covered the 2nd District Congressional Race, and have no plans to do so in the coming week.

"To those of you who have been offended by this incident, I apologize. My relationships with politicians have not and will not affect my reporting. I appreciate your understanding."

She told MSNBC.com, "I covered more politics than any of our reporters. I try to establish good relationships with both sides, so they would call our station. A lot of the political PR people are former reporters, so they have allegiance to one candidate or another."

The photo was taken at a cancer fundraiser, she said. "We have a lot of mutual friends." She said she posted it on her Facebook page where only her friends could see it. "I foolishly wrote, in jest, to vote for him, and forgot completely that that was on there. When my boss heard about it, I immediately removed it. Press people of opponents called it to attention."

"The irony is, if anyone had really done their research, I was a registered Republican. I have now changed to being an Independent, and I will stay that way my entire career. I learned a lot from this experience that I will never repeat. In a way, I'm glad this happened to me at age 23, and not 33, and I will learn from it."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fox affiliate in Minneapolis, KMSP, Alix Kendall, morning anchor, $250 in September 2006 to Midwest Values PAC, which gave to Democratic candidates.

Kendall said she opposes the war and thought that her donation was anonymous.

"I also believe that the station doesn't own my political views and values. Did I make the contribution? I did. We all have political opinions in this business. A lot of us want to be politically active. But marching in a war protest isn't an option, being a recognizable person, so we give with our checkbook. I don't think that working for a news organization I give up my rights. I interview plenty of people that I don't agree with, but I also ask questions to get the other side. I think it's actually an advantage — in a news organization we have people of many political views. We have healthy debates. I think it's my civic duty to be involved in what matters to me. I think it's ridiculous that anyone who's sitting in front of a camera doesn't have an opinion — come on, we all do. Did I think about that at the time? No, I didn't. Maybe I should have. But I still feel I have a right to my civic duties."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fox affiliate in Washington, D.C., WTTG, Laura Evans, anchor, $500 in August 2006 to John Sarbanes, Democratic House candidate in Maryland. Evans anchors the 5 p.m. news. She is listed in FEC records by her married name, Laura Manatos.

On her blog on the station's Web site she commented recently on the Iraq war: " Everyone's trying to save face here ... all the while people are dying. Didn't voters in November speak loud and clear, saying they're tired of the fighting and want an end in sight?"

When first contacted by MSNBC.com, Evans said her husband, lobbyist Mike Manatos, "actually made the contribution, and the check was written on our account."

But the records show that her husband had already given the legal limit to Sarbanes. He couldn't legally contribute more. When asked about those records, she said, "I hadn't talked to my husband. He reminded me that he had actually talked to me about this, because he had maxed out, could we write a check in my name. I said, 'Sure.' Now I remember having this conversation. It's within Fox policy, it was OK for me to do it."

Fox does allow news employees to make political contributions.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) MSNBC, Joe Scarborough, host of the "Morning Joe" talk show and the evening newscast "Scarborough Country," $4,200 in March 2006 to Derrick Kitts, Republican candidate for the House from Oregon. Scarborough was a Republican member of Congress from Florida from 1995 to 2001. He also provides political commentary for MSNBC, CNBC and NBC's "Today Show."

MSNBC policy requires journalists to report any potential conflict of interest and to seek approval from the president of NBC News before making any political contribution.

A spokesperson for NBC, Jeremy Gaines, replied to questions sent to Scarborough. "Yes, he did make a donation to Derrick Kitts. Kitts is an old friend of Joe's. Joe hosts an opinion program and is not a news reporter."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) MTV News, Gideon Yago, "Choose or Lose" presidential correspondent, $200 to Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark in January 2004; $500 to America Coming Together, which campaigned against President Bush, in September 2004; $250 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004; $250 to VoteVets, which is running ads against the president's handling of the war, in March 2006, and $250 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in October 2006. He said he is no longer at MTV News.

Gideon Yago, raw:

"I don't understand. Things that I do as a private citizen?

"We're not a traditional news network in the sense of NBC or Fox or CBS.

"We're sensitive about equal time or fairness. We're non-biased.

"I mean, what the f---, man?

"I came back from doing coverage in Iraq and was very moved by what I saw. I was never told by my boss or anyone that we couldn't give to a campaign.

"I'm not a journalist now. Writing fiction.

"I would never qualify what we do as journalism. Ninety percent of what we did was simple identification, after 9/11: Who is Rumsfeld? Who is Colin Powell? Who is Al Qaeda?

"I try to call it as you see it.

"After my second trip to Iraq in 2004, I felt the conventional news media was not doing a good enough job of conveying the horrors and the failures of the war in Iraq.

"At 18 I was a registered Republican. At 24, I was a registered Democrat.

"I tried very hard — our job was not an indoctrination process — I tried to be as professional as possible whenever possible.

"We were a non-traditional news outlet. We were nonpartisan.

""OK, I've been rebuked. Thank you for spanking me in public.

"Do you hand in all your rights as a public citizen when you do this?

"I mean — who's your editor? I'm going to call him right now."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) NBC News, Victoria Corderi, "Dateline" correspondent, $250 in December 2005 to Democrat Josh Rales, who ran for Sen. Paul Sarbanes' open seat in Maryland. Rales finished a distant third in the primary. Corderi is listed in the FEC records by her married name, Keane.

"In a word, 'Yikes!'" Corderi said in an e-mail. "Josh Rales is a longtime neighbor and acquaintance. A good friend of mine gave him a cocktail party last year, a sort of 'meet and greet.' My husband and I went to be nice, knowing full well Josh was tilting at windmills with his candidacy. Later, my husband (who is a dyed-in-the-wool Republican, by the way) told me he'd written a check for a nominal amount so our friend would have something to show for the night. I'd not even thought to consider that since my name is on our checks that I would appear in public records as a contributor. I have a policy of not contributing to campaigns and not showing public support for candidates. This was a lapse that you brought to my attention."

The NBC policy does not outright allow or forbid donations but requires approval of the president of NBC News.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) PBS affiliate in New York, Thirteen/WNET, Rafael Roman, host of "New York Voices," $250 to President Bush in July 2004, and $300 to Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota the same month.

"I wouldn't do it again, quite frankly," said Roman, a former news anchor for WNET. "At that time it seemed to me that it wasn't part of a story that I was covering in the future. I would say, now, no. Even if you're not covering something, you might at some point. Citizenship is an important responsibility that's not taken away by the job you do, but I wouldn't do it again."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Independent station KTVK, Phoenix, Steve Bodinet, reporter, $400 to John Kerry in May 2004.

Bodinet did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

Online:

(D) MSNBC.com, Rachel Schwanewede, senior editor, TodayShow.com, $461.30 to America Coming Together in October 2004. She was among the more than 20 journalists who bought tickets to the "Vote for Change" series of concerts to raise money to defeat President Bush in 2004. MSNBC.com is not naming the others, but in the interest of transparency we are naming our own.

Schwanewede said she purchased the tickets for her husband's birthday for a Springsteen concert.

"There's no intention of mine to donate to any political campaign."

MSNBC.com policy requires permission of the editor in chief for any political activity.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) MSNBC.com, Joel Widzer, travel columnist, $2,000 to Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson in February 2007.  Widzer actually is an employee of MSNBC.com partner Tripso.com, though the FEC record lists his employer as MSNBC.com.

Widzer said that he actually gave $1,000. The FEC records show two separate entries of $1,000 on the same day.

"I'm actually a Republican — one of the few Republicans who still support George Bush and think he's doing OK with the war effort," Widzer said. "One of my friends works for Bill Richardson and asked me to give to the campaign. She knew me from MSNBC, so she listed that."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Salon.com, Gary Kamiya, writer at large and former executive editor, $250 to MoveOn.org, which opposed President Bush, in September 2004.

Kamiya, who now writes a column for Salon, was executive editor when he made the donation. In his column he has urged the impeachment of President Bush, whom he calls "a historic disaster."

Kamiya did not reply to messages. The editor of Salon, Joan Walsh, said he is traveling.

This week, after MSNBC.com called, Salon.com decided to forbid political donations by all editorial staff.

"Salon hasn't had an explicit policy, but the growing importance and credibility of our political coverage convinced us that we needed one," Walsh said in an e-mail. We've told all editorial staff not to donate to candidates, campaigns, parties or groups that give money to candidates, campaigns or parties. We're including all edit staffers because we like to move people around, and come election time, most people contribute to campaign coverage."

The policy went into effect this week, Walsh said, but the editors "have been talking about it for a while."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Salon.com, Katharine Mieszkowski, reporter, $400 in April 2007 to EMILY's List, which gives to Democratic candidates who support abortion rights. Also gave $200 in June 2003 to EMILY's List.

Mieszkowski writes mostly about technology, science and the environment. She has also written on explicitly political topics, including John Kerry, Al Gore, voting machines, Texas textbooks, President Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina, school vouchers and peace movements.

See the previous entry for Salon's new policy.

Click to return to the list.

-----

Magazines:

(D) The Atlantic Monthly, Martha Spaulding, assistant managing editor, $500 to the Democratic National Committee in May 2004.

No longer at The Atlantic, Spaulding said, "It's certainly not the Atlantic's contribution." She said she was not aware that contributions were disclosed on the Internet with a donor's occupation and employer. And she said she didn't understand how any company could forbid political activity by its employees.

The magazine said a tougher policy may be coming.

"Historically, we have not had a formal policy," said spokeswoman Amy Thompson, "and as an institution, The Atlantic is part of ‘no party or clique,’ as our founders put it. Even though we have not implemented an officially codified policy, Atlantic editorial staffers are discouraged from supporting political campaigns.

"We're discussing this issue, and may in fact move toward a formal prohibition on political donations by editorial staffers. Of course, we have always policed any conflicts-of-interest on the part of writers and editors working on political stories."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Business Week, Prudence Crowther, chief copy editor, $200 to John Kerry in April 2004, and another $200 that July.

Crowther said she doesn't think of herself as a newsperson. "I'm not a journalist, so I can't help you. I did obviously contribute to the Kerry campaign."

Business Week policy allows donations for most staff. "Our Code of Journalistic Ethics requires journalists to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to recuse themselves from stories if a conflict could occur," said spokeswoman Patti Straus. "As a business publication, we don't prohibit campaign contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Economist, Andreas Kluth, technology correspondent, $500 to John Kerry in May 2004. He is based in San Francisco, covering Silicon Valley.

"In my case, just to be clear, I told the editors about it, and I don't even cover politics," Kluth said in an e-mail. "That said, I do think that journalists can write perfectly fair and balanced pieces as professionals and simultaneously have private opinions, vote, donate, etc. Conflicts of interest such as shareholdings (where press coverage could be seen to lead to personal profit) are delicate, so in all these cases, disclosure seems appropriate. At The Economist we regularly disclose all investments."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Economist, Joanne Ramos, financial writer, a total of $2,100 in September and December 2005 to Matt Brown, the former Rhode Island secretary of state, a Democrat who ran for the Senate before dropping out amid a fundraising controversy. Ramos has written about banking, corporate pension reform, auditor concentration, the hedge-fund sector, Iraq’s banking system and international accounting standards.

"I'm a finance writer. I don't write about politics," Ramos said. "I'm not sure what the policy is."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) Forbes, Jean A. Briggs, assistant managing editor, donations to the Republican National Committee of $250 in March 2007, $250 in December 2005, $250 in February 2004, $250 in February 2003, $250 in March 2002, $250 in February 2001 and $250 in August 2000; as well as $250 to Rick Lazio, House candidate, Republican, in August 2000.

"I don't make campaign contributions," Briggs said. "I'm the assistant managing editor of Forbes magazine. I don't make campaign contributions."

When the contributions were described, she said, "You call that a campaign contribution? It's not putting money into anyone's campaign."

(The Republican National Committee put $25 million into the Bush-Cheney campaign in 2004.)

When asked whether she made these contributions, Briggs said, "I don't believe I have to answer that question. Goodbye. Thank you for your call." And she hung up the phone.

In a follow-up e-mail, Briggs complained that MSNBC.com had not formally requested an interview before calling to ask questions.

Forbes policy allows campaign contributions. Says Monie Begley Feurey, senior vice president, corporate communications: "Forbes has no policy regarding employees' personal contributions to political parties or candidates, but it does encourage any employee to be involved in their communities in any way they choose."

Briggs is also listed as a board member by PERC, the Property and Environment Research Center, which advocates "market solutions to environmental problems." PERC has received funding from ExxonMobil and other oil companies. The organization's Web site says, "She exposes fellow New York journalists to PERC ideas and also brings a journalistic perspective to PERC's board. As a board member, she seeks to help spread the word about PERC's thorough research and fresh ideas."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) Forbes, Robert Lenzner, national editor, $1,500 to Kathleen Troia McFarland, House candidate, Republican, in November 2005.

"As a rule, I don't make any political contributions," Lenzner said. "That was before the campaign that started. I never made any other contributions. It was merely a social, personal thing. I do not write about politics. Her husband is a friend of mine. It was contributed on the spur of the moment. I did not make it as a member of Forbes magazine. I don't believe it's a violation of any policy of Forbes magazine."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Forbes, Tatiana Serafin, senior reporter, $202 to John Kerry in April 2004. She covers billionaires, retailing and other topics.

"I don't feel comfortable talking about my politics," Serafin said. "I'd prefer not to answer questions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Inc., Jane Berentson, editor, $1,000 to the Democratic National Committee in April 2004.  Berentson is the senior editor at the magazine.

"Inc. has no prohibition against campaign contributions," she said in an e-mail.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, David Denby, film critic, $1,000 to John Kerry in March 2004, and $250 more in May 2004.

He writes reviews and capsule summaries of films, including Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" (an "epochal documentary"), Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" ("slipshod intellectually"), and "An Unreasonable Man," a documentary on Ralph Nader, whom he apparently hasn't forgiven for getting in the way of the Gore and Kerry presidencies ("a thoughtless man who believes only in himself.")

Denby did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Henry Finder, editorial director and books editor, $250 to John Kerry in June 2004.

New Yorker policy allows donations.

"It's an interesting question," Finder said. On the one hand, he said, it's not convincing to think that by abstaining from making a donation, a journalist is "preserving some kind of equilibrium in my head where I don't have opinions. You can't will yourself to be indifferent between chocolate and vanilla.

"If people give, it's in the public realm. How do you justify opacity as somehow making journalism better, to say, we need to preserve an appearance of indifference. That's something like misrepresentation, a dubious form of disguise."

Though he said he could see the "prudential argument," that as an editor you wouldn't want to feed the public perception of bias, he expressed faith in "ordinary reportorial professionalism, that whoever the reporter, they're not writing a piece that will make the world better, in their view, but they're writing the piece that is the piece."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Tad Friend, Hollywood reporter, $500 to John Kerry in May 2004. Friend is the author of "Lost in Mongolia: Travels in Hollywood and Other Foreign Lands."

Friend did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Ann Goldstein, head of the copy department, $500 to MoveOn.org in October 2006.

"That's just me as a private citizen," Goldstein said. As for what the New Yorker's policy might be, she said she hadn't considered it. "I've never thought of myself as working for a news organization."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Hendrik Hertzberg, senior editor, $2,000 to John Kerry in three payments in 2004. Hertzberg often writes the Comment in the front of the magazine, and was a speechwriter for Jimmy Carter.

Hertzberg, in answer to the question whether he made these donations, sent this reply: "Damn right."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, John Lahr, theater critic, $200 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in June 2006, $250 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004, and $500 to John Kerry in March 2004.

Sometimes Lahr works an anti-Bush quip into his work. (Such as, to the president, "thinking is a fuse that has to be blown in order for him to do what he wants to do.")

"The whole point about criticism is to stimulate debate," Lahr said. "My biases are transparent, because I express them. One of the implications of your question is that people have no integrity — that people wouldn't be fair.

"What would you have me write? It would be hard to find a sentient person who could take a strong position for what the Republicans have done in the past six years. What are you going to do, take a position for their position on global warming or the war in Iraq? C'mon!

"This is a Puritan folderol. If you scratch farther into the people who make these rules, say at The New York Times, they're all in somebody's pocket."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Janet Malcolm, writer, 17 donations for $6,700 since 2003 to Democratic campaigns and PACs, including EMILY's List and the Democratic National Committee.

Malcolm did not return phone calls.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, George Packer, the prize-winning war correspondent for the magazine since 2003 and author of the 2005 book "The Assassins' Gate: America in Iraq," $750 to the Democratic National Committee in August 2004, and $250 in July 2005 to Iraq War veteran Paul Hackett, a Democrat who campaigned against the war and for a seat in Congress in Ohio.

"Journalists don't give up their rights as citizens. They can and should vote; they can and should support candidates," Packer said in an e-mail.

"My readers know my views on politics and politicians because I make no secret of them in my comments for The New Yorker and elsewhere. If giving money to a politician prejudiced my ability to think and write honestly, I wouldn't do it. Fortunately, it doesn't."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New Yorker, Mark Singer, profile writer, $250 in April 2004 to Victory Campaign 2004, which supported America Coming Together, which opposed President Bush. In January 2004, he had written the magazine's profile of Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.

"I will tell you the truth. I am not a political writer," Singer said. "I got a call in the summer of 2003 from David Remnick because Nick Lemann was going to run the journalism school at Columbia, and he needed someone to cover the Dean campaign. And I tried to avoid doing it, because I don't believe fundamentally in the process by which we elect presidents — obviously it's an insane process. And I had a son who was working in the Dean campaign — he was 17, up in Burlington. It was a conflict of interest. I disclosed in the piece that my son was working for the campaign."

As for the donation, "I knew I was never going to write another political piece in my life. There was a decent interval, or an indecent interval, after the article. I must have rationalized that a get-out-the-vote campaign, there was some distinction — but now that I'm talking to you, I see that there's not a distinction. Obviously I'm a Democrat. I understand the nature of the question you're asking — but it's much easier to influence the outcome of a political election by writing about it than it is by making a contribution.

"I believe very much that writers have to be aware of conflicts of interest in all sorts of situations. Probably there should be a rule against it. But there's a rule against murder. If someone had murdered Hitler — a journalist interviewing him had murdered him — the world would be a better place. I only feel good, as a citizen, about getting rid of George Bush, who has been the most destructive president in my lifetime. I certainly don't regret it."

Click to return to the list.


-----

(D) The New Yorker, Judith Thurman, writer, $1,000 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2004. Thurman, who normally writes about books, art and fashion, wrote the magazine's profile of Teresa Heinz Kerry, published on Sept. 27, 2004. Her donation to the Democratic National Committee was recorded on Oct. 7.

Reached at home, Thurman said, "Let me get back to you." She did not call back.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Newsweek, Temma Ehrenfeld, associate editor, $1,000 in June 2006 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. She has been a reporter for Newsweek columnist Jane Bryant Quinn and does her own reporting on science and health topics.

"I don't do political coverage here," Ehrenfeld said. "I report for Jane Bryant Quinn's finance coverage. We write about topics like health insurance, so sometimes we write about legislation. I do write some of my own stories, not political."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D & R) Newsweek, Jane Bryant Quinn, personal finance columnist, $1,000 to Judy Aydelott, a Democrat who ran for Congress in New York. Previously gave $2,800 in four donations to a Republican, former Rep. Sue Kelly of New York.

"In my case, I gave to dear friends," Quinn said. "They came to me, and I gave. And I gave to both Republicans and Democrats."

A Newsweek spokeswoman described a policy with some room, particularly for freelancers like Quinn.

"We have an expectation that Newsweek journalists will not make any contributions to political campaigns," said Jan Angilella. "Are there exceptions to this general expectation? Yes. Depending on the particular circumstances, including an employee's or freelancer's specific role or responsibility."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Newsweek, Anne Underwood, correspondent on health and medical stories, $1,000 to John Kerry in March 2004. The donation is listed under her married name, Enslow.

"I really don't want to participate in this," Underwood said, hanging up the phone.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Rolling Stone, Jason Fine, deputy managing editor, $280 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004.

Fine did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Rolling Stone, David Swanson, assistant editor, $202 to John Kerry in March 2004.

Swanson did not reply to messages. He is now at the company's Men's Journal.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Rolling Stone, Jann Wenner, editor and publisher, $25,000 to the Democratic National Committee in 2006; $20,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2006; $10,000 to the Democratic National Committee in 2004; $5,000 to committees supporting Bob Casey, a Democrat elected to the Senate from Pennsylvania in 2006; $1,250 to Democracy for America, Democrat Howard Dean's PAC, in 2004; $1,008 to America Coming Together, which opposed President Bush, in 2004; and $500 to Democratic Senate candidate Ned Lamont in Connecticut in 2006.

Although known for music coverage, Rolling Stone covers politics, too. And editor/publisher Wenner is still very much involved in editing the magazine, said publicity director Beth Jacobson.

"We encourage our editors to be active participants in the democratic process," Jacobson said. "We don't operate like a newspaper. We're a magazine with a point of view, and it's clear we have that point of view. People go to Rolling Stone — they know what they're going to get."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Time, Jim Frederick, senior editor, $500 to the Vermont Democratic Party in October 2006.

"At the time I made that donation, I was Time’s Tokyo Bureau Chief. I am currently a senior editor at Time’s European edition, based in London," Frederick said in an e-mail.

Time's policy says, "Employees are free to engage in personal volunteer political activity and contribute personal resources to candidates and parties in any manner consistent with federal, state, and local laws."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) U.S. News & World Report, Michael Freeman, researcher, $250 to Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, in February 2007.

"I'm not a journalist. I work in fact-checking," Freeman said, though he is in the news department. About the policy, he said, "In past years, they've sent that out, and it seemed like it really wasn't clear whether it applied to me or not."

The magazine's policy says employees could be accused of a conflict of interest if they donate, while it doesn't explicitly bar such a donation.

A spokeswoman for U.S. News said the new editor, Brian Kelly, is reviewing the policy.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) U.S. News & World Report, Amanda Spake, senior writer, $250 to John Kerry in August 2004. Spake covered public health issues and policy. Now a freelance writer, she is on a fellowship from George Soros' The Open Society Institute to study the health effects of Hurricane Katrina.

"I went to a luncheon for Kerry," Spake said. "I had friends who were organizing that luncheon, and I felt I had to do it."

As for any conflict of interest, she said, "I never covered politics. I covered public health. It did not impact my coverage one bit."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Vanity Fair, Elise O'Shaughnessy, contributing editor, $2,000 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in January 2004.

A spokeswoman for Vanity Fair said that O'Shaughnessy was a contributor to the magazine when she made this donation. She is a former executive editor of Vanity Fair. For a time earlier this year she was editor of Tango magazine for women

"While Vanity Fair does not have a policy regarding its contract writers’ making political contributions, we would expect a writer to recuse himself from any story that presented a conflict of interest or even the appearance of one," said spokeswoman Beth Kseniak.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Vanity Fair, Michael Shnayerson, contributing editor, $2,000 to John Kerry in March 2004. The magazine has described Shnayerson as its de facto environmental editor, because he writes frequently on the topic, but he also has written about the likelihood of hacking of electronic voting machines, Halliburton's war-related profits, anti-terrorism data mining, global warming skeptics and other political topics.

"The fact is that there was no ban on political contributions at Conde Nast publications, at least as best I could determine (nor is there now)," Shnayerson said in an e-mail.

"I did give the matter some thought before I wrote my check, and it seemed to me that this was at worst a gray area, and at best a fairly clear one in favor of making the contribution. ... As a contributing editor, I write four stories a year. One might be about the environment or related to politics; the others might be about anything from a media subject to a fashion designer. This is different from a newspaper writer who covers a political beat, and to me tips the balance in favor of my right, as a citizen, to make any legal political contribution I choose to make."

He added this postscript: "I must say I do wish, in retrospect, that I had that $2,000 back to make a perhaps wiser contribution this go-round!"

Click to return to the list.

Newspapers:

(in order by approximate daily circulation)

(D) McClatchy Newspapers, Beryl Adcock, news desk chief, Washington bureau, $1,000 to John Kerry in April 2004. (She also gave a total of $650 to the Democratic National Committee in 2002 and 2003.) A blogger called these contributions to the attention of Adcock's bosses, Tony Ridder and Clark Hoyt. (Hoyt is now the public editor at The New York Times.) The bureau, then part of Knight Ridder, was known for its reporting that called into question the rationales for the war in Iraq.

"I was extremely upset and shaken that I had misunderstood something so important, and offered my resignation to Clark so as not to bring any further embarrassment to the company," Adcock said in an e-mail. "He refused it. He and Mr. Ridder both expressed regret that I had misunderstood the policy and had been hurt by it. I had discussed my donations on more than one occasion with more than one other editor here; I'd never made any secret of them, not knowing I wasn't supposed to be doing it. After this emerged, I sure wished that one of those editors had told me — or even told my bosses — so I could have stopped sooner.

"I no longer have a copy of the Knight Ridder ethics policy. Roughly, I recall it saying that employees are permitted to engage in political activity but that if there's a question of a conflict of interest they should discuss it with their supervisors, or something like that. I copy-edit stories and compile our news budgets and other communications with our newspapers, and it did not occur to me that my Washington bosses considered those functions a conflict of interest with making campaign donations.

"I was under the same policy at Knight Ridder's The Charlotte Observer newspaper in North Carolina, where I'd worked before coming to the Washington bureau. There I mostly worked in the features section, so I was confident there was no conflict of interest. I probably should have rethought that when I came to Washington, but I simply read the ethics policy, saw it was the same one I was used to, and my husband and I continued making our occasional donations."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Wall Street Journal, Krishnan Amantharaman, managing editor of the classroom edition, $500 to Barack Obama in two payments in February and March of 2007.

"I asked for those contributions back," Amantharaman said. "I don't want to comment on this."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Wall Street Journal, Henny Sender, senior special writer, $300 to John Kerry in May 2004. Sender covers Asia.

"Dow Jones' Code of Conduct does indeed bar news employees from contributing to partisan political organizations," Sender said in an e-mail. "I had been in Asia most of my career and this had never been an issue for me. As soon as I learned of this policy, which was shortly after I made that donation, I asked for and received a refund of my check back from the Kerry campaign. So for me, I wrote the check, realized the mistake, got the money back."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Wall Street Journal, Eben Shapiro, editor of the Weekend Journal section on Fridays, $1,500 to Democratic Victory 2004 in June 2004.

"The entry you're asking about reflected a purchase of art I made at a fundraiser," Shapiro said in an e-mail. "Shortly afterward, I was reminded of the Dow Jones' Code of Conduct provision barring news employees from contributing to partisan political activities. At that point, I returned the art and my money was refunded. So, while my mistake landed me on the list you're checking, at the end of the day my contribution was erased."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New York Times, Randy Cohen, ethics columnist, $585 in three donations in August 2004 to MoveOn.org, which conducted get-out-the-vote drives to defeat President Bush. In addition to the syndicated column "The Ethicist" for the Times Magazine, Cohen answers ethics questions for listeners of NPR.

Freelancers like Cohen are covered by the Times policy, which says, "Times readers apply exacting standards to the entire paper. They do not distinguish between staff-written articles and those written by outsiders. Thus as far as possible, freelance contributors to The Times, while not its employees, will be held to the same standards as staff members when they are on Times assignments, including those for the Times Magazine. If they violate these guidelines, they will be denied further assignments."

Cohen said he thought of MoveOn.org as nonpartisan and thought the donation would be allowed even under the strict rule at the Times.

"We admire those colleagues who participate in their communities — help out at the local school, work with Little League, donate to charity," Cohen said in an e-mail. "But no such activity is or can be non-ideological. Few papers would object to a journalist donating to the Boy Scouts or joining the Catholic Church. But the former has an official policy of discriminating against gay children; the latter has views on reproductive rights far more restrictive than those of most Americans. Should reporters be forbidden to support those groups? I’d say not. Unless a group’s activities impinge on a reporter’s beat, the reporter should be free to donate to a wide range of nonprofits. Make a journalist’s charitable giving transparent, and let the readers weigh it as they will.

"Those who do not cover anything, but write a column of opinion should have even more latitude. It is such a writer’s job to make his views explicit. Those donations to nonprofits will no doubt reflect the views he or she is hired to express. In evaluating such civic engagement, it is well to remember that to have an opinion is not to have a bias. To conceal one’s political opinions is not to be without them."

After MSNBC.com checked the names of Times staff and contributors on this list with a spokesperson for the Times, Cohen sent this addendum:

"That said, Times policy does forbid my making such donations, and I will not do so in the future."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The New York Times, Christine Muhlke, deputy editor, style magazine, $500 to John Kerry in June 2004, and $1,800 in two donations in 2004 to Downtown for Democracy, which made independent expenditures to oppose President Bush.

Muhlke referred questions to a Times spokesperson, who said Muhlke joined the Times staff in April 2005, after the donations. Before then she was a contributor on contract, writing food articles. The Times policy, which forbids donations, says that it applies to freelance writers as well as staffers, while they are on Times assignments.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D & R) The New York Times, Nancy Tilghman, freelance writer, $2,300 to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in March 2007; $1,000 to Bill Manger, Democratic candidate for Congress, in August 2004; $1,000 to President Bush in March 2004; and $2,000 to Wesley Clark, Democratic presidential candidate, in December 2003. Her most recent Times bylines were in January 2006 and sporadically from 2001 through 2004. Her 2007 donation also listed the Times as her employer.

Tilghman said she no longer writes for the Times.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Los Angeles Times, Nick Cuccia, design editor, $500 to John Kerry in March 2004, and $1,500 more in July 2004. Cuccia is a page designer on the features desk.

"I was not responsible for, or involved in, editing or placing national, political or campaign stories in the paper," Cuccia said in an e-mail.

The Times policy in effect at that time applied only to political writers: "Staff members should not take part in political or governmental activities they may be called upon to cover, or whose coverage they supervise."

In 2006, the Times completely overhauled its ethics policies, including a ban on political contributions by any editorial staff member.

"I am in compliance with that policy," Cuccia said, "and intend to remain so. Beyond that, I haven't any further comment."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Los Angeles Times, Manohla Dargis, film critic, now at The New York Times, gave $1,000 to John Kerry in mid-July 2004, when she was still at The Los Angeles Times, and $1,000 more in late July, after she had been hired by The New York Times, but before she began the job. Previously, while at the L.A. Times, she gave $300 to Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader in September 2000, and $500 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in December 2003.

Dargis has reviewed Michael Moore's "Sicko," among other films with political themes. She wrote that "Sicko" was "persuasive, insistently leftist."

"I made the Dean, Nader and first Kerry donations when the Los Angeles Times had no policy/guidelines prohibiting political donations by the likes of me," Dargis said in an e-mail. "The second Kerry donation was made when I was a free agent, employed neither by the Los Angeles Times nor by the New York Times."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Los Angeles Times, Dan Neil, automobile critic, $250 to the Democratic National Committee in July 2004. Neil received the Pulitzer Prize for criticism in 2004.

"Yup, that's me, all right," Neil said in an e-mail.

"Two things: I'm a columnist, not a straight-news guy, and my political affiliations are not, I don't think, in doubt. Goes to the question of whether my 'activism' by donation is indicative of some covert (and mythic) liberal bias in the press.

"Two, I believe — I am not certain of this — the paper's policy specifically bars public political advocacy/activism. In other words, I couldn't go out and rep the DNC and then pretend to be an impartial commentator, as Paul Begala has done, or come very close to doing, in any event.

"This policy has, at times, worked a hardship on me. I wanted to march with Latinos in Los Angeles in 2006 — justice for Latino immigrants being a human rights issue right on my front door in Los Angeles — but I couldn't because of my understanding of the paper's policy on public advocacy."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) Los Angeles Times, Charles Perry, food writer, $200 to the Republican National Committee in October 2004.

"Yes, that $200 was my donation," Perry said in an e-mail.

"The Times ethics policy states as its basic principle that editorial employees may not use their positions at the paper to promote personal agendas or causes, nor should they allow their outside activities to undermine the impartiality of Times coverage, in fact or in appearance. I wholeheartedly support this policy, without any reservation.

"I'm a food and drink writer, not a news reporter. I have always felt there was no problem with contributing to my party because Food is a non-political section (could I somehow smear Democrat beers and whitewash Republican ones?). Therefore I felt my political contributions could scarcely discredit my writing, or my employer.

"The ethics policy says that staff members may not "contribute money to a partisan campaign or candidate" (though it also says "The Times does not seek to restrict staff members' participation in civic life"). Since 2004, just to be on the safe side, I have declined to make any political contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) New York Daily News, Celia McGee, reporter, $1,000 to New York Sen. Hillary Clinton in May 2005, when McGee was on staff for The Daily News, and another $1,000 in March 2007, when she was a freelancer for The New York Times.

The Daily News spokeswoman said McGee left the paper in February 2006. A Times spokesman said the prohibition applies to freelancers "when they are on Times assignments."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) New York Daily News, Matthew Roberts, photographer, $404 to John Kerry in March 2004.

Roberts did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Washington Post, Stephen Hunter, film critic, $250 to the National Republican Congressional Committee in June 2004. Hunter received the Pulitzer Prize for criticism in 2003. He also is known as a writer of thriller novels.

"That is indeed my donation, probably an unwise idea," Hunter said.

"A couple of years afterward, I was called aside by someone in management and told not to do it again. And being an obedient boy, I didn't do it again."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Chicago Tribune, Maureen Ryan, entertainment reporter, $1,500 to John Kerry in three donations in 2004; $1,000 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2004; and $500 to the Ohio Democratic Party in October 2004.

In September 2005, the Tribune's public editor disclosed in his column that Ryan had given to Kerry, then had written a column unfavorably comparing President Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina to Oprah Winfrey's response when she visited New Orleans.

In her own column, Ryan apologized to readers : "You should have had that information up front. I am sorry you did not. Having said that, I can tell you from the bottom of my heart that if Kerry had been elected, and events in New Orleans played out exactly the way they did last week, I would have written the same piece, substituting Kerry's name for Bush. Though I contributed to a Democratic cause, last week I praised Fox News' coverage of the post-Katrina disaster. Though I celebrated Oprah Winfrey's actions after the flood, I have written articles critical of her in the last year. As I have in the past, I will continue to attempt to be as honest and as fair as I can be in my television coverage, and I would feel honored if you could forgive this unintentional oversight and continue to share this space with me. Because you readers — even those of you who disagree with me — are the reasons I do what I do."

The paper's public editor responded to MSNBC.com's questions sent to Ryan, saying the rules were tightened in early 2005.

"The Tribune ethics policy includes a blanket ban on editorial employees making any political contributions," wrote public editor Tim McNulty. "Now a few particulars...

"Back in 2004, Ms. Ryan was a writer in the feature section of the newspaper. She asked both her immediate supervisor and my predecessor as public editor if it was OK for her to make contributions.

"She was told at the time that it was permissible as long as she was not involved in political coverage. Ms. Ryan did not have any role then in reporting directly or even indirectly on politics.

"Since that time, the company found it impractical to monitor exceptions and far better, we think, to simply say in the ethics policy that 'no editorial employee, whether involved in political coverage or not, may donate to or be affiliated in any way with such groups' (referring to political parties and causes)."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Chicago Tribune, John von Rhein, classical music critic, $200 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2004.

Update: Von Rhein sent this by e-mail: "I write strictly about classical music for the Chicago Tribune and was unaware of the paper's policy regarding political contributions by staff writers, even when acting as private individuals. I since have been informed of the policy and have told my editors I will adhere to company guidelines in the future."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) San Francisco Chronicle, William Pates, letters editor for the editorial page, $600 to John Kerry in three donations in March and April 2004. Pates, who selected which letters were published, was moved to the sports copy desk after the staff of a Web site at San Jose State University, Grade the News, asked about his contributions. The Newspaper Guild contested the transfer and Pates is now back as the letters editor.

Pates did not return a message, but he told The Associated Press that he had not thought the paper's policy against political activity would apply to him, because he worked on the opinion pages.

The paper's editorial page editor, John Diaz, told MSNBC.com that Pates had done an honest, professional job in his "gatekeeper role" and just hadn't thought the issue through.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Newsday, Long Island, Rita Hall, section designer/artist and sometime writer, $210 to Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton in March 2006, and ...

"Dig deeper," she said. "I gave $2,000 to Kerry." Indeed, she did, in March 2004. "I'm not allowed to do this. I know it's against the rules," she said of giving to candidates. "I'll probably get fired. They're looking for any excuse to cut staff here."

She also slipped some anti-Bush material into a first-person column she wrote about her son, who won the Top Chef competition on the Bravo network. "In passing I mentioned that I was interested in finding people who hated Bush as much as I did. They took that out.

"My view is: You're still going to have an opinion whether you admit to it or not. If you don't admit to it, you're being dishonest. Let's be transparent."

Newsday's senior editor, John Mancini, who hadn't known of Hall's contributions, said, "It is against our policy for anyone on the editorial staff to make political contributions. Anything that would call into question our objectivity. It stems from the appearance of conflict being a problem."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Boston Globe, Rebecca Ostriker, arts editor/writer, $2,000 to John Kerry in June 2004.

Ostriker was on vacation and did not reply to messages.

Globe editor Martin Baron said Ostriker was a part-time copy editor in the Living/Arts section in June 2004. Now she is on staff.

"Our policy is clear," Baron said in an e-mail. "No political contributions by anyone in the newsroom. I am not aware of any breaches of the policy in the last few years."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Boston Globe, Henry Riemer, sports statistician, $1,700 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in 2003-2004 and $1,000 in 2004 to Democracy for America, which gave to Democrats. Riemer retired in 2004.

"We felt the need in 2004 to clarify a seeming ambiguity among some staffers about whether those who had no involvement in political coverage could make political contributions," said Globe editor Martin Baron. "The discovery (by our own reporters) of Henry Riemer's contribution was one reason we issued a clarifying memo."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Star-Ledger, Newark, Robin Gaby Fisher, feature writer, $200 to President Bush in March 2004 and $300 to the Republican National Committee in November 2004.

Fisher said she doesn't cover politics and the paper doesn't have a policy on contributions. She gave in 2004, she said, because of the war. "It frightened me that it was a bad time to change course, because we were in the war. After getting your call and reflecting on it, I think it was kind of a bad idea."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Barbara Haugen, copy editor, $250 to Sen. Amy Klobucher, a Democrat, in October 2006.

Haugen did not return phone calls. The paper's managing editor, Scott Gillespie, said, "We have a conflict of interest policy. We ask that people who are involved in political coverage — we dissuade them — we actually dissuade the entire staff. We haven't banned it outright for the entire newsroom. Our policy says that people should avoid doing any partisan politics on their own, avoid any politics. It's especially emphasized for people who do political coverage."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Detroit Free Press, Susan Hall-Balduf, copy editor, $300 to John Kerry in July 2004. Now editing news copy, she gave when she was in features.

"I was scolded," Hall-Balduf said. "We did a story on how easy it was to look up these records on the Internet, and they were not happy to find a couple of our own people on the list. But I made the point that I worked only in features, and I never edited any stories that have to do the election. I was told not to do it again. I wouldn't do it again. But at the time my job was focused on the doings of Britney Spears."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Detroit Free Press, Joel Thurtell, reporter, $500 to the Michigan Democratic State Central Committee in September 2004.

"Whatever the Free Press policy is," Thurtell said, "I actually have my own policy about that: I'm a citizen of the United States. I have a right to support whatever candidate I like."

Thurtell said his political views don't influence his reporting, as demonstrated by his role as a reporter on the stories disclosing the ways that Democratic Rep. John Conyers used his congressional staff to run personal errands and do campaign business.

"I got tons of e-mail from liberal-type people who likened me to Karl Rove. I have tried to be as honest as I possibly can as a reporter."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Oregonian, Portland, Steve Amick, reporter, $200 in  July 2004 to the Democratic National Committee. Amick is no longer at the paper.

"I don't want to be interviewed," Amick said, hanging up the phone.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Miami Herald, Harry Broertjes, copy editor/page designer, $250 to the Republican National Committee in June 2006, $500 more in August 2006 and $200 to President Bush in August 2004.

Broertjes, on the Broward County staff, did not return telephone messages. Herald managing editor Dave Wilson said the policy is clear: "Journalists should not make campaign contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Joe Cline, graphic artist, $200 to the Republican National Committee in October 2004, and $400 to President Bush in November 2004.

Cline did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Penni Crabtree, business reporter, $225 in October 2004 to MoveOn.org, which ran get-out-the-vote efforts to defeat President Bush.

Crabtree did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Bob Elledge, assistant news editor, $250 to Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark in January 2004 and $500 to John Kerry in July 2004. Also gave $250 to Clark in 2003.

Elledge did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Shaffer Grubb, graphic artist, $500 to MoveOn.org, which opposes President Bush, in 2006; $500 in 2006 to Michael Arcuri, a Democrat elected to Congress from New York, in 2006, and $500 in 2006 to Christine Jennings, a Democrat who lost a still-contested congressional race in Florida.

Grubb does elegant infographics, including an award-winning graphic on the toll of U.S. dead in Iraq. He began working at the paper in May 2005 after graduating from the University of Missouri-Columbia.

"I asked my superior before I gave," Grubb said. "It's allowed."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Arline Smith, news production editor, $500 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2004.

"Yes, that is my donation," Smith said in an e-mail. "I am the production editor at the Union-Tribune. This means I coordinate the flow of type and pages from the Newsroom through Composing to Platemaking. In my job I have no responsibility for the assigning, reporting or editing of political stories or for their placement, headlines, etc. There is nothing in our ethics policy that bars me from making political donations."

See below for her husband, Charlie.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The San Diego Union-Tribune, Charlie Smith, copy editor, $500 to the Democratic National Committee in June 2004.

"That's my wife, Arline," Smith said. "She is the one who made the donations." And his wife agrees. (See Arline Smith, above.)

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Sun, Baltimore, John Scholz, copy editor, $250 to the Democratic National Committee in March 2004.

According to an article in The Sun, Scholz retired in July 2004. He worked for the business copy desk and did not view the donation as a conflict, the newspaper said. The Sun at that time had no policy banning donations. Scholz was due to retire soon after that article was published.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) San Jose Mercury News, Rachel Wilner, sports editor, $250 to John Kerry in June 2004.

Wilner said her understanding was that the paper's policy allows contributions unless it would present the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Boston Herald, Chris Donnelly, news librarian, 16 donations in 2003 and 2004: $3,200 to the Democratic National Committee, $2,500 to John Kerry, $675 to MoveOn.org, which opposes President Bush, and $200 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Donnelly, who now works for a database company, said he thought of himself as a librarian, not a journalist, although he worked for the news department. He said he didn't know the paper's policy.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Ethan Skolnick, sports columnist, $250 to Peter Deutsch, Democratic candidate for Senate, in July 2004; and $250 to Debbie Schultz, Democratic candidate for House, in June 2005.

"I no longer can make any more," Skolnick said in an e-mail. "At the time that I made them — they were both friends of a politically active friend — I was not aware of the newspaper's policy that restricts us from doing so (even if we work in sports, as I do).

"Anyway, after carefully reading the ethics policy last year, I disclosed the donations to my editor. When I've been asked for donations since, I have declined. I also told political organizations to take me off of their call lists."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Randy Galloway, sports columnist, $750 to the Democratic National Committee in three payments in 2004 and 2005; and $500 to Democratic Rep. Martin Frost in September 2004. Previously gave $1,000 in 2002 to Senate candidate Ron Kirk, Democrat.

"That was my wife, Janeen," Galloway said in an e-mail. "It's a joint checking account, both names on the checks. She makes her own political donations."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Vincent Langford, sports copy editor, $500 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2006.

Langford did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Hartford Courant, Nancy Gallinger, copy editor, $250 to John Kerry in July 2004.

"That is my contribution," Gallinger said in an e-mail. "Since that time, Tribune has adopted a policy against political contributions by journalists."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Hartford Courant, Bill Lewis, copy editor, $250 to John Kerry in August 2004. Lewis, who was a copy editor on the A section, or news, is now in features.

Lewis did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Richmond Times-Dispatch, Michael Hardy, state political reporter, $1,000 in February 2006 to Democrat Matt Brown, the former Rhode Island secretary of state, who ran for the Senate before dropping out amid a fundraising controversy.

As a state capitol political reporter in Virginia, Hardy writes frequently about Democrats and Republicans.

"My contribution in a Rhode Island primary was based on a personal decision," he said in an e-mail. "As for my assignments, I cover the governor's office, state appellate courts and the General Assembly. I have no national responsibilities."

The managing editor of the Times-Dispatch, Peggy Bellows, did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Richmond Times-Dispatch, Pam Mastropaolo, copy editor, $1,650 to the Democratic Party of Virginia in February 2007, and $1,165 in February 2006.

Mastropaolo didn't reply to messages. Nor did the managing editor, Peggy Bellows.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Contra Costa Times, Walnut Creek, Calif., Robert Taylor, fine arts reporter, $500 to the Democratic National Committee, October 2004.

"I write about visual arts for the Times," Taylor said. "I'm a features writer and reviewer. If I were a political reporter, I might have made a different decision. If we have a policy on making political donations, I'm not aware of it."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Press-Enterprise, Riverside, Calif., Mark Benoit, wire editor, $500 in October 2004 to MoveOn.org, which ran get-out-the-vote efforts to defeat President Bush. As a wire editor, Benoit is a copy editor who selects which state, national and international stories to publish.

"I'd rather not talk about it," Benoit said.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Palm Beach Post, Fla., George McEvoy, columnist, $200 to John Kerry in May 2004, another $200 in June 2004, and $204 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004.

McEvoy did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Commercial Appeal, Memphis, Barbara Bradley, fashion editor, $300 to the Republican National Committee in November 2004. Previously gave $500 to President Bush in December 2003.

"I am a fashion and features reporter and was ignorant of our newspaper's policy against donations by reporters," Bradley said in an e-mail. "My editors informed me, and I made no more contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Des Moines Register, Stephen P. Dinnen, business reporter, $250 to John Kerry in June 2004. His byline is S.P. Dinnen.

Dinnen said he wasn't sure whether he gave to Kerry or not. "It might have been my wife. She's active in politics." He said he wasn't sure how the campaign would have gotten his occupation and employer for the records.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Honolulu Advertiser, Chris Neil, wire editor, $500 to John Kerry in June 2004. A wire editor is typically a copy editor who selects which state, national and international news to publish.

Neil did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Blade, Toledo, James Bradley, copy editor, $250 to John Kerry in June 2004, and $250 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004.

Bradley, who edits news copy, said he didn't know whether the paper has a policy on political activity. "It's never come up."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Lexington Herald-Leader, Brian Throckmorton, copy desk chief, $250 to John Kerry in June 2004. His staff edits local news articles, selects wire stories and writes headlines.

"The thing that we try to avoid is the appearance of partiality," Throckmorton said. "And for me that means bumper stickers and yard signs and things that might lead the public to easily but falsely suspect that there's a problem with our impartiality. But something as private as a donation which they might have to work to find out...."

Besides, he said, "the fact of a political donation doesn't imply lack of impartiality or bad news judgment to begin with, and one person making a donation doesn't imply that there's a bias throughout the newsroom."

Then Throckmorton said, "I'm not comfortable being included in the story. Do not publish my name."

The paper's managing editor, Tom Eblen, said in an e-mail, "Herald-Leader newsroom employees are not allowed to actively or publicly participate in politics. Our policies strongly discourage, but do not prohibit, this type of donation."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Morning Call, Allentown, Pa., Beth Hudson, sports reporter, $500 to the Republican National Committee in October 2004.

Hudson did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Daytona Beach, Fla., News-Journal, Marc Davidson, editor, $200 to Sen. Bill Nelson, Florida Democrat, in March 2006, and $250 to Sen. Russell Feingold, Democrat from Wisconsin, in July 2002.

Davidson, the senior editor and a member of the paper's owning family, said in an e-mail that the paper "has no policy prohibiting contributions by employees. It does require its editorial employees not to RUN for office, though. I think my grandfather, who made most of the policies we follow, thought that preventing donations would rob them of their last right to political expression — a line he didn't want to cross.

"Yes, those are my donations. I've always been an active Democrat, and until my responsibilities at the N-J became editorially related, I was a figure in the county Democratic Party.

"But I will say that no one is ever in doubt over this newspaper's politically liberal stance, and it's unlikely that I would send money to a candidate I was not already committed (in my mind) to support. That support would be evident in my work, regardless of my contributions.

"As a general rule of thumb we try to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest, so it's unlikely that you'd see too many political contributions large enough to make those lists coming from any editorial staff. I'm kind of the exception to that rule because, as I said earlier, no one is in any doubt about the paper's stances and since my name (rightly or not) is inextricably linked with the paper, no one is going to construe an occasional donation by me as being in conflict and everyone is going to assume I sent a contribution even if I didn't.

"I don't often make such contributions, but sometimes, as with the Nelson one you list, I felt it was vital to support him."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Albany, N.Y., Times Union, Greg Montgomery, graphic design editor, $500 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004; $725 to MoveOn.org, which opposed President Bush, in 2004; $1,600 to John Kerry in 2003-2004; and $250 to Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., in 2006.

Montgomery said he doesn't think of himself as a journalist — he designs covers for magazines and feature sections and does the occasional news graphic or map. He said the paper has no written policy on political activity. When he gave, he said, "I thought that was a particular point in time when it was time to stand up and be counted." As for any future donations, he said, "It's a moot point, because I'm out of money."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The Washington Times, film critic Gary Arnold, $1,000 to the Republican National Committee in four donations in 2004. Also $1,400 total to the RNC in six donations in 1997-2003. Arnold was the full-time critic for The Washington Times before becoming a freelancer for the paper at the end of 2005.

Arnold said he'd like to see more disclosure of the political views of journalists. "I'm always reading things from political reporters who pretend to be impartial, but it's clear what their biases are."

He said that political issues are "a non-issue for 90 percent of the movies I review" but that the minority is getting larger, with much of Hollywood wearing its opinions on its sleeve.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) San Gabriel Valley Newspapers, Calif., Eric Terrazas, sports editor, $200 to the Democratic National Committee in October 2004, and $500 more in May 2006.

Terrazas did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) The New York Sun, Liz Peek, financial columnist, $2,000 to Elizabeth Dole, Republican, in March 2007; $2,000 to the Volunteer PAC, which supports Republicans, in June 2006; $1,000 to Mark Kennedy, Republican, in June 2006; $500 in June 2006 to Straight Talk America, which supported Republicans; $15,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee in April 2006; and $4,200 to Kathleen Troia McFarland, Republican House candidate, in November 2005. In previous years, she gave $65,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Peek did not return calls. A PR person sent an e-mail asking what the story was about but then would not answer questions.

The managing editor of The Sun, Ira Stoll, said, "We don't have a written policy on that. I can imagine situations where it might pose a conflict. But to me the right to contribute to a campaign is a basic free speech right, and I would want to err on the side of allowing those contributing to the Sun to exercise those rights, and it has the side benefit of disclosing to those readers something that might otherwise be hidden from them."

But, we asked, were the donations disclosed to the readers in the Sun? "No, but as you've proven, they are easily found on the Internet."

"Our readers are very sophisticated," he said, able to tell the difference between an editorial endorsing a candidate and a journalist donating to a candidate.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Lincoln, Neb., Journal Star, Paul Fell, editorial cartoonist, $450 in 2006 to Maxine Moul, Democratic candidate for the House.

"For your information, I did contribute the amounts listed to the Maxine Moul for Congress campaign in 2006," Fell said in an e-mail. "I am a freelance cartoonist, who contracts with the Lincoln Journal Star to draw three editorial cartoons a week.

"They don't pay me enough money to be able to dictate how I conduct myself in political campaigns. I generally do not donate to political candidates, but Maxine Moul is a longtime friend and former newspaper publisher where I got my start as a cartoonist back in 1976.

"Frankly, I don't give a rat's ass what the Lincoln Journal Star or their parent organization, Lee Enterprises, policies are on allowing newsroom staff to give to candidates and parties. I do not believe they did disclose my donations. That's their problem, not mine."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) The Lincoln, Neb., Journal Star, Sylvia Hermanson, copy editor, $250 to the Democratic National Committee in January 2007.

Hermanson said this was a joint contribution with her spouse. "So, am I busted? I'll have to check our policy on newsroom practices."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(R) Macon, Ga., Telegraph, Stephen "Keich" Whicker, local government reporter, $250 to Republican congressional candidate Mac Collins in October 2006.

Whicker, who covered a different congressional race for the paper, said he didn't contribute — it was his father of the same name who paid for a ticket to a fundraiser where President Bush was speaking. But it was the son, the reporter, who used the ticket to attend the fundraiser. "Dad's a Republican. He couldn't go, and basically he gave the ticket to me to go."

"Because I cover politics, I'm extremely careful about that sort of thing. I don't even vote in elections. I didn't pay for it. I went to attend — I'd never seen the president before."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) New Hampshire Union Leader, David Johnson, sports copy editor, $500 to James Craig, the state House Democratic leader and candidate for Congress, in March 2006.

"I don't believe they have a policy on that," Johnson said of the Union Leader, the state's largest newspaper. "I've never heard one way or another. It doesn't affect anything that I do personally. Not that sports doesn't have political issues. It does."

The paper's managing editor, Edward C. Domaingue II, did not reply to an e-mail.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Corpus Christi, Texas, Caller-Times, Elvia Aguilar, business writer, $500 to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in March 2007.

She said she accompanied her father and brother to a Clinton fundraiser, but that it was her father, not she, who made the contribution. "No, my news organization doesn't allow journalists to make campaign contributions. And I didn't make a campaign contribution," Aguilar said in an e-mail. "I accompanied my father and brother to the event, and my father paid for this with the cashier's checks. I do not know why I showed up as a contributor."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) National Catholic Reporter, Margot Patterson, senior writer and arts/opinion editor, $2,100 to Claire McCaskill, Senate candidate, Democrat, in October 2006; a total of $800 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2004 and 2006; $1,000 to Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver in 2004; and $250 to Howard Dean, Democratic presidential candidate, in February 2004.

Patterson has reported from the Middle East and written extensively about political topics, including cover articles on the Iraq war, for the independent national weekly in Kansas City. Both Rep. Cleaver and Sen. McCaskill oppose the war.

The reporter also signed a petition against the war and paid to have it published as the advertisement "KC Metro Citizens Oppose War On Iraq!"

None of this was disclosed to the readers of NCR, which bills itself as "the independent newsweekly."

Patterson said her policy is more honest than the "hypocrisy" of reporters who hold positions but don't back them up with donations.

"Most reporters I know have opinions, regardless of whether in their capacity as citizens they choose to give to a political candidate," she said in an e-mail. "I feel my responsibility as a journalist is to be fair to the people and issues involved and to be as accurate as possible. That responsibility is incumbent upon me regardless of whether I choose to vote — or not — or choose to contribute money to a political campaign — or not."

"As I see it, I was born a citizen of the U.S. and I will die a citizen of the U.S. and my responsibilities to my country do not suddenly cease because I take a particular job. When I see my country embark on a course of action that I think disastrous to its future and fatal to its citizens, I think it my duty to do my utmost to stop it. That includes supporting candidates who will promote a less aggressive foreign policy and who will defend constitutional government and the rule of law. All of us have multiple roles and identities in life that we negotiate."

About signing the petition against the war, Patterson wrote in the e-mail, "I’m sure I had long since forgotten about that ad when writing the articles." In any case, she said, that's not "an ethical problem. For one thing, I wasn’t covering the same people I gave money to when I wrote the articles. For another, the newspaper I work for has been strongly and unequivocally opposed to the war from the outset and has made that abundantly clear in its editorials. NCR has always been anti-war and it is NCR policy not to accept a dime from the Department of Defense. I do not think NCR readers can be in any doubt as to where the paper stands when it comes to war. It’s against it. There is no attempt to be neutral or even-handed about this topic."

Her editor, Tom Roberts, said he was "less than a strict constructionist on the matter of what reporters should be allowed to do in the exercise of citizenship and conscience." He said that the paper's articles have in fact been neutral and even-handed, though its editorials have opposed the war. On campaign contributions, he allowed them unless they would be perceived as a conflict of interest.

"The contribution to the ad, on the other hand, is clearly another matter. Although the paper, editorially, has consistently and strongly opposed the war even before it started, a reporter signing a petition crosses the line to activism and we've spoken about it."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) York, Pa., Daily Record, Teresa Cook, copy editor, $500 to Democratic House candidate John Sarbanes in Maryland in July 2006.

Cook didn't return calls. Her editor, James McClure said, "I'm not going to comment."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Muskegon, Mich., Chronicle, Terry Judd, reporter and chief of the newspaper's Grand Haven bureau, $1,900 to the Democratic National Committee in six contributions from 2004 through 2006; and $2,000 to John Kerry in March 2004.

"You caught me," Judd said. "I guess I was just doing it on the side."

The paper's metropolitan editor, John Stephenson, said appearances of a conflict do matter. "We run letters all the time from people who say we're right-wing this or left-wing that." He checked with the paper's senior editor and found that the paper has no written policy on donations, but he said it will consider one now.

"This information makes us want to think further and more deeply about what we encourage and discourage in reporters," Stephenson said. "We have always historically said, 'You guys can have any political beliefs you want, just don't wear your hearts on your sleeve, or your bumper. Truthfully, this sort of thing may be the new bumper.' Ten years ago, you may have to have waded through a mountain of paper to find this stuff. We are rethinking. It's OK to do something if our readers don't know it? Is it all about appearances, or is there more principle here? It's an interesting question."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fort Wayne, Ind., News-Sentinel, Fran Adler, copy editor, $250 in August 2006 to Dr. Tom Hayhurst, Fort Wayne city councilman and Democrat who lost the congressional race in 2006 for the 3rd Congressional District.

Adler said, "Well, you know, it was from my husband and me. I'm surprised that my name is on it. That's neither here nor there. That's just how you found me. We are people and citizens, and we have the right to support candidates in our own ways.

"I was asked to distribute flyers at a 4-H fair, but my editors thought something that visible was inappropriate. But I was allowed to make a contribution. I'm a citizen, and I'm going to have my opinions regardless. I think I can be absolutely objective about him and his opponents and anything. I'm in the distinct minority in this newspaper in my political leanings — I don't think it's an issue."

The paper's editor, Kerry Hubartt, said he hadn't thought of campaign contributions as public. "We don't mind contributions as such, but we have to tell our staff they can't openly participate in a campaign, handing out flyers.

"There are probably things we may not know about in terms of participation," Hubartt said, "that might make us nervous if we did know about them."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Fort Wayne, Ind., News-Sentinel, Faith Van Gilder, copy editor, $500 in October 2006 to Dr. Tom Hayhurst, Fort Wayne city councilman and Democrat who lost the congressional race in 2006 for the 3rd Congressional District.

"Actually, my husband and I gave," Van Gilder said. "I don't remember why.

"We just rewrote our ethics policy for the newsroom about two years ago. I looked at it, and it said you can't run for political office. It doesn't mention donations or wearing a political button or putting a political bumper sticker on your car. We have a pretty small newsroom, 30-35 people, and we, for the most part, we all know each other's political stripes.

"I'm sure one of our main objectives is to be very neutral when we're writing a headline, when we're editing copy. We would never put our personal opinions in a cutline. When you're a professional journalist, you separate what you believe from your job. I've been in the business for 25 years. Maybe someone who is younger has struggled more with that. I'm able to keep the two separate."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Martha's Vineyard, Mass., Times, Whit Griswold, copy editor, $650 to MoveOn.org, which got out the vote against President Bush, in September 2004, $1,500 more in October 2004, $500 in September 2006, and $1,000 in November 2006; and $500 to Joseph Courtney, Democratic House candidate in Connecticut, in September 2006.

Griswold said he now believes that he shouldn't donate to candidates.

"Your question's a good one. I never even thought of it. I'm not a reporter. I don't think of myself as setting policy — I don't. But I have a little influence as a copy editor. I can see, if the world was perfect, I shouldn't do it. My boss doesn't want us to run for office. Coincidentally, he's a conservative Republican and did endorse Bush twice. I'm way over on the other side."

Click to return to the list.

Radio:

(D) Air America and CBS, Betsy Rosenberg-Zimmerman, environment talk show host and environment reporter, $500 in June 2005 to Joe Nathan, Democrat; 1,000 in October 2004 to Environment2004 PAC, which made independent expenditures opposing President Bush; $1,000 in June 2002 to Colorado Senate candidate Thomas Strickland, Democrat; $250 to John Kerry in March 2002; and $1,000 in September 1998 to EMILY's List.

Rosenberg-Zimmerman contributed while she was reporting on the environment for CBS Radio and KCBS in California, and then when she moved to Air America to host a talk show. Her program on April 17 was devoted to Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, to whom she contributed by giving $1,000 in February 2004 to the California Victory ’04 PAC. "Congratulations for all your bold leadership," she told Boxer. She didn't disclose to her listeners that she was a Boxer donor.

She said she is not a journalist now, although her program's Web site calls her one. Now she's a "radio activist."

"For a while I was calling myself an environmental reporter, because it was kind of newsy thing. That bio may just be an old bio."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) National Public Radio, Corey Flintoff, newscaster, $538 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in December 2003. He is well known from "All Things Considered."

"That contribution was actually made by my wife, but it was on a joint account, so my name showed up on it," Flintoff said. "Since then, NPR has instituted a strict policy against campaign donations or political activity of any kind. I agree with the policy and follow it scrupulously. My wife still makes contributions."

Flintoff said a blogger called the contribution to NPR's attention, helping to lead NPR to tighten its policy.

Click to return to the list.

----

(D) National Public Radio, Michelle Trudeau, correspondent, $500 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in two contributions in September 2003, and $500 more to Dean in May 2004. Trudeau covers science topics for "Morning Edition" and "All Things Considered."

Trudeau did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) National Public Radio affiliate in Washington, WAMU, Susan Goodman, reporter, $450 to Judy Feder, Democrat, in a congressional campaign in 2006; and $1,000 to the Ben Cardin for Senate campaign, Democrat, in 2005. Goodman, no longer at the station, reported on politics and public affairs. She also contributed feature stories to NPR's "Morning Edition" and "All Things Considered."

"Yes, I made those contributions and I voted for those people," Goodman said. "I did not cover those campaigns. I wouldn't cover anyone I was actively supporting."

If donations were not allowed, "I wouldn't work at a place like that. I don't think you should give up your rights as a citizen if you work as a journalist. I guess there are a few issues that I have no opinion on, but there are very few issues that I have no opinion on. There's an attempt to be balanced and fair. I feel as a citizen and a voter, I am responsible to myself, and to know about issues and take a stand. As for being a journalist, hey, you try to present your story in a way that opens the issue for people to ask questions, not to sell somebody on something."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) WWJ News Radio, Detroit, Vickie B. Thomas, reporter, gave a total of $1,000 to Senate candidate Kweisi Mfume in the Maryland race for a Senate seat in June and December 2005.

Thomas did not return telephone calls.

Click to return to the list.

-----

Wire services:

(D) Bloomberg News, Katherine Burton, reporter, $250 to John Kerry in March 2004, and $500 in June 2004 to Downtown for Democracy, which opposed President Bush. Burton covers investment management, including hedge funds.

Burton did not reply to messages.

The editor in chief of Bloomberg, Matthew Winkler, said that political donations are generally allowed at Bloomberg, but not if they might present a conflict, such as for political reporters. It's up to employees to police themselves. Someone at his level, he said, can't make any contributions.

Winkler himself gave $750 to the 2000 Gore campaign and the Democratic National Committee in 1998-1999 and gave to Democrats in earlier years. As reported by Washington City Paper in 2002, Winkler said these donations were made by his wife from a joint account and that he and his wife were one "economic entity." He said he and his wife would make no more donations. But in 2004, the records show, his wife gave $1,600 to Al Gore and the Democratic National Committee.

"I can't control everything my wife does," he told MSNBC.com. "I try. I try. I try."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Robert Dieterich, energy editor, $250 in June 2004 to America Coming Together, which opposed President Bush.

"I'm not going to comment on this," Dieterich said. "I'm not going to have a conversation about this. I'm not going to give you a read one way or another." And he hung up the phone.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Joshua Fellman, reporter in Asia, $500 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in December 2003, and after Dean dropped out, $500 to John Kerry in March 2004. Fellman has written about the Bush administration policies on the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.

Fellman did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Robert Houck, multimedia news editor, $250 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in January 2004. He also gave $710 to Dean in 2003.

Houck did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Milanee Kapadia, reporter, $1,000 to John Kerry in May 2004. She is now a reporter for NY1, a cable news channel in New York City.

Kapadia did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, James Polson, reporter on energy and utilities, $250 to Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri in October 2006.

"The reason I made the donation is, I'm also the managing partner of a family farm in Missouri," Polson said. "My cousin who works the farm was a big McCaskill supporter. I cover electric companies in 50 states. I actually had not consulted the ethics policy."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Carlos Torres, reporter in Washington, $250 to John Kerry in July 2004. He also gave $250 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in September 2003. Torres covers U.S. economic news.

"I have nothing to say about that," Torres said.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, Robert Urban, real estate reporter, $225 in August 2004 to MoveOn.org, which opposed President Bush. Also gave $250 to Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in November 2003.

"I have no comment," Urban said.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Bloomberg News, John Wydra, radio newscaster, $200 in October 2004 to the Democratic National Committee and $400 in 2003 to the same. No longer at Bloomberg, Wydra is starting a Web site, WydeWorld, promising "incisive commentary." "In 1986," the site says, "John took a one-year leave of absence from CBS in order to run for public office as a candidate for Congress in the 13th U.S. Congressional District in New Jersey, where he won the Democratic primary, but lost to the incumbent in the general election. That experience was the foundation for his intensified interest in public affairs."

Wydra did not reply to messages.

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Dow Jones Newswires, Samuel J. Favate Jr., editor, $1,036 total in August and October 2004 to America Coming Together, which ran get-out-the-vote efforts to defeat President Bush.

Favate didn't reply to messages. These donations may have been ticket purchases to the "Vote for Change" concerts.

On his personal blog, Favate rails against the Iraq war, for gun control, for a tax audit of Christian psychologist James Dobson, etc.

An older blog, still online until recently, lists Favate's "people I don't like": George Bush, Pat Robertson and the Christian Coalition, Donald Rumsfeld, the Republican Party, John Ashcroft, Bill Frist, Dennis Hastert, Tom DeLay, Ann Coulter, the f---ing NRA, corporate America ("these are the people who are really in charge"), Clear Channel, Halliburton, Cablevision, and Wal-Mart. "You can be sure that I will be adding to this list from time to time, so try not to piss me off."

After MSNBC.com left a message asking about the blogs, his name disappeared from the current blog and the older one went dark, though you can see a copy.

Dow Jones spokesman Howard Hoffman said, "No, we don't have a blog policy, and we're not overly concerned about what Sam did or didn't do on his blog exercising his free speech rights."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Dow Jones Newswires, Billy Mallard, credit markets editor, $200 to MoveOn.org in October 2006.

"I actually was aware of the restriction on partisan political contributions in the Dow Jones Code of Conduct before I made the contribution but thought MoveOn.org was OK because it wasn't the Republican Party or Democratic Party," Mallard said. "Once this surfaced last week, I spoke with my editors and agreed that this is a partisan group. Therefore I should not have sent a contribution and have asked for my contribution to be returned."

Dow Jones spokesman Howard Hoffman said, "We take our independence and our integrity seriously, and our Code of Conduct requires all news employees and executives to refrain from partisan political activity. We do understand that people sometimes make mistakes and they have an opportunity to make amends."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Reuters, Lisa von Ahn, news desk editor, $200 to the Democratic National Committee in September 2004.

Von Ahn, who is listed as a desk editor, referred questions to the public relations person for Reuters, who said the company allows journalists to make "personal contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

(D) Reuters, Michael Erman, reporter, $250 to the Democratic National Committee in March 2004.

Erman covers oil and energy companies and issues. He wrote recently about corporate funding of skeptics of global warming. He declined to answer questions, referring the call to the public relations person, who said Reuters allows journalists to make "personal contributions."

Click to return to the list.

-----

Non-English-language news organizations:

(MSNBC.com was not able to reach any of these.)

(D) La Stampa, newspaper in Turin, Italy, Paolo Mastrolilli, New York correspondent, $250 to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in February 2007.

(D) New Delhi Television, Stephen Marks, reporter, Bethesda, Md., $2,300 to Hillary Clinton in March 2007.

(D) The Korea Daily News, Chang W. Kim, journalist, Kew Gardens, N.Y., $1,000 to Hillary Clinton in February 2006.

(D) Pakistan TV, Jack Khangura, reporter, Valencia, Calif., $4,000 to Hillary Clinton in December 2005.

(D) Oriental Daily, Chun Fai Cheng, reporter, Las Cruces, N.M., $250 to the Democratic National Committee in December 2005.

June 21, 2007

HOW LOW CAN THE UNION LEADER GO?

Just how low is the Manchester Union Leader willing to go in its monomaniacal quest to browbeat Senate Republicans into supporting that putrid excuse for a constitutional amendment known as CACR 19?  As low as you can go, judging by the Union Leader’s June 19th editorial page, which features an op-ed by none other than State Democrat Party Chairman, Ray Buckley, who is only arguably the dirtiest player in the history of New Hampshire politics.  Yes, the Union Leader is in such a pique that a majority of Senate Republicans have chosen to follow Republican principles, instead of bowing to the Union Leader’s jejune bullying, that the Union Leader has enlisted the poster child for political hate speech, Ray Buckley, in its jihad against Republicans who won’t follow the Union Leader’s lead and march us off an educational cliff.

But it’s not only judgment that has deserted the Manchester Union Leader; it is intellectual honesty and logic as well.  The Union Leader claims that the Senate Republicans opposing CACR 19 believe that the State Constitution mandated local control of public education prior to the Claremont decisions.  While I don’t claim to have the Union Leader’s power to read the minds of all these State Senators, I do know many of the folks opposing CACR 19 and I know that they are not the benighted idiots that the Union Leader claims they are.  Indeed, it is they, not the Manchester Union Leader, who understand the Constitution.

The State Constitution has always allowed local control of public education.  It still does because, despite what the Manchester Union Leader asserts, the Supreme Court’s Claremont decisions are not amendments of the Constitution.  It is the Union Leader, then, that doesn’t know what it is talking about when it claims that CACR 19 would restore the relationship between State and local governments that existed prior to the Claremont decisions.  To the contrary, it would fundamentally alter the relationship by making local control of public education unlawful.  That is why the Democrats and ersatz Republicans like Mike all-I-really-care-about-is-becoming-Speaker Whalley are so hot to trot for it.

The Manchester Union Leader is correct when it points out that there are some problems with the wording of CACR 20.  But the solution is to fix the wording, not pillory Senate Republicans for supporting CACR 20.  The intent of CACR 20, which is to assure local control of schools, is far superior to the intent of CACR 19, which is to require the type of centralized, bureaucratic, top-down system of education based on the misbegotten premise that the quality of public education is determined by the amount of spending that has been an abject failure in other states.

Indeed, aside form wisecracks about CACR 20’s wording, the best that the Manchester Union Leader can come up with to promote CACR 19 relative to CACR 20 is that CACR 20 “is a complete reversal of historic practice in New Hampshire.”  The Union Leader is quite wrong on that count.  While it is true that there has been a State Board of Education and State standards since 1919, they were and are not mandated by the State Constitution, and it has been local decision-makers that have decided how to implement those standards and how much to spend to do so. 

But even if the Manchester Union Leader were right that the “historic practice in New Hampshire” has been plenary State control of public schools, why do we want to write that practice into the State Constitution, when we have the choice of a far better policy prescription?  If the goal is to improve our children’s education, then we should be amending the Constitution to decrease State control over education.  Indeed, even the Union Leader, albeit grudgingly, concedes this point: “We agree that more local control of public education is desirable.”

Senate Republicans acted responsibly and wisely in not being browbeaten and panicked into voting for CACR 19.  CACR 19 writes an antiquated and failed model of public education into the State Constitution.  And its is unclear how the Supreme Court would construe CACR 19 as the Democrats are saying it means one thing and ersatz Republican Whalley and his crack legal team is saying it means something different.

The Manchester Union Leader and Ray Buckley competing in a political limbo dance to trash conservative Republicans:  did you think you’d ever see the day?

 

BY ED

 

Notable Quotes - Treason

Update:  Loyal Reader Paul informed me that I might have been off a tad with respect to attribution:

During floor debate on the Iraq war yesterday, Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) quoted Abraham Lincoln as advocating the hanging of lawmakers who undermine military morale during wartime.

"Congressmen who willfully take action during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs, and should be arrested, exiled or hanged," Young declared.

One problem: Lincoln never said such a thing.

Conservative scholar J. Michael Waller did, in an article for Insight magazine in December 2003. Waller later told Annenberg Political Fact Check that the supposed quote "is not a quote at all" but that a copy editor mistakenly put quotation marks around his words, making them appear to be Lincoln's.

Thank you Paul!  BTW, go over and visit Paul at his place!

==================================== 

Some common sense from one of our best Presidents....perhaps it should be used a bit more often:

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale,  and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged."
 
                               ~ President Abraham Lincoln

Think of any?

 

(H/T: Sue)

This could get ugly...

The story about the Plainfiled, NH couple holed up on their property doesn't look like it's going to remedy itself anytime soon. When one listens to what the Browns are saying, why are the Federal agents doing things like shutting off power and the Internet? Why are they apparently shooting at people on the property? I still think that the best way to handle this is to leave the Browns right where they are. Put a fence around the perimeter to keep them IN, if it's really necessary. Let their friends bring food and supplies. Just make sure that the Browns, rightfully convicted of Federal tax evasion, stay put. Is this not less expensive than putting them in jail, anyway?
.
Otherwise, click here to read what the Browns are saying and ask yourself if it's worth the Feds doing anything more than containment.
 
Waco 
 Branch Davidian compound-- Waco, TX
 
 
BY DOUG 

Illegal Immigration Stats JUST from California

A loyal reader sent this to me a little while ago (H/T: Ron)...while I kind of figured these kind of numbers, it was surprising to be reminded how bad the numbers are.  And to see where the numbers came from - The L.A. Times (which seems to prefer an open borders policy):

 

California map
 

 

1. 40% of all workers in L.A. County ( L.A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for  cash and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card.
 2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.
 
 3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens
 
 4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on  Medi-Cal , whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
 
 5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.
 
 6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
 
 7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.
 
 8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
 
 9. 21 radio stations in L.A. are Spanish speaking.
 
 10. In L.A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish.
      (There are 10.2 million people in L.A. County ).
 
 (All of the above are from the Los Angeles Times)
 
Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.
 
29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.  

 

 

June 20, 2007

'Grok Blogger joins with Carbon Coalition. Yep. We've gone green...

 

Windmills

 

 

 

Windmills on Gunstock? Why not?
.
Holding our local businesses and corporations accountable for their greenhouse gas emissions is a necessary step in combating global warming
I would add that local governments should be held to this same standard. As a matter of fact, doing so might be the easiest way to attain the greatest impact in the fight against global warming. Consider my town-- Gilford, NH. I have got to believe that the town and school operations consume the largest amount of energy, thereby emitting the greatest number of pollutants. It makes sense to target the largest single energy consumer in the town, doesn't it? Since local government is "of the people, by the people, and for the people," and those people adopted the "Climate Change Resolution", this really becomes a no-brainer. Besides, if we really put our efforts into my proposal below, I believe that we can do more REAL, IMMEDIATE change in the fight against global warming than a satchel of letters delivered to Congress and the president.
.
This is the proposal I sent to the Gilford Board of Selectmen calling for action in response to our town's passage of this year's Warrant Article 30, the "Climate Change Resolution". It was hand-  delivereed yesterday...
.

June 19, 2007

To the Selectmen

Town of Gilford, NH

As you know, at this year’s Annual Meeting, voters adopted Warrant Article #30, the so-called “Gilford Climate Change Resolution”.

On Election Day, the measure’s supporters passed out literature (a copy of which is attached to this letter) noting that

Climate change is hurting our community, our state, our way of life.

The handout encouraged Gilford voters to

Vote YES on #30 to:

  • Urge National Leaders to act against Global Warming
  • Encourage real reductions of greenhouse gasses while protecting our economy and supporting alternative energy
  • Create a committee in Gilford to reduce energy use and save taxpayer money

It further urged those taking a ballot to

Tell our elected leaders that you want action.

Your children and grandchildren will appreciate your YES vote on the Climate Change Resolution—Warrant # 30

I wholeheartedly agree with the will of the Gilford people in adopting this resolution back in March. As we all know, major leaders such as Al Gore and important United Nations scientists have allowed us to see the truth that it is almost too late to save the planet from mankind’s uninhibited and wanton release of greenhouse-gas causing carbon emissions.

.
Thankfully, forward-looking citizens in Gilford have decided that the problem is one that we must aggressively seek a solution to, if we are not going to destroy the planet inherited by our children and grandchildren. Luckily for us all, a majority of voters agreed that we must do something—now.

To that end, as I believe that we must think globally yet act locally, I am calling on you, our elected leaders, to immediately begin fulfilling the will of the voters with the formation of the “energy study committee” called for in Article #30.

I agree that by reducing energy use in our towns and schools, the taxpayers will save money. I am volunteering my time and efforts to serve on this committee, as I have put many hours of thought into this dire problem, and what we in Gilford can do to reduce our carbon footprint.

While I agree with calling on our National Leaders to act against Global Warming,” I believe that there is much that we can do right here at the local level. Several examples of potential carbon reducing measures that could easily be implemented include the study of uses and policies of the town’s inventory of motorized vehicles. From the dump trucks to rack bodies, police cars, the red fire department pickup truck, etc, we as a town should look at ways of reducing the operating times and usages, thus reducing emissions. Simple policies like ordering the fleet of town vehicles that I witness idling at the Dunkin Donuts parking lot every morning at 6:25AM turned off are easily implemented methods of energy consumption reductions.

Additionally, I believe that the school could significantly contribute to a local reduction of carbon emissions by implementing mandatory school bus rider ship and a ban on parental drop-offs/ pickups except for those removed from student transportation due to discipline issues. This would include students with drivers’ licenses as well. While this might seem to be an extraordinary hardship for some, it really is a small sacrifice in the face of the environmental catastrophes that await us in the absence of immediate action. Besides, we’re already paying for the busses anyway.

Lastly, I believe that the town of Gilford should call on the county delegation to take steps to study the feasibility of wind-generating equipment on county and state- owned mountaintops in the area. As the supporters of Warrant #30 have stated in their literature, we must “encourage real reductions of greenhouse gasses while protecting our economy and supporting alternative energy.” To that end, I believe that by installing windmills on all mountaintops, we could generate carbon-neutral electricity for the entire county. The county could lease the land to some private wind-energy enterprise for this purpose. In addition to lease monies, the county could negotiate a percentage of all energy sales as another revenue stream providing relief to taxpayers. Gilford could benefit on top of the obvious (carbon-reductions) by collecting property taxes on the new facilities located within town limits.

These are just a few ideas that could be looked at as Gilford looks to be a good steward of the environment. I eagerly await the Selectmen’s answer to my proposal.

Respectfully,

Doug Lambert

 

 

Election Day Handout

 

Water Truck
 

 

Antique town water tanker truck on a trip to nowhere (this road is a dead end. A more cynical person might call this a "hiding" spot). With rain about one hour off, the town's water tanker truck is spotted travelling two different roads that have not one square foot of dirt road. It appears to be carrying a heavy load. Howm much fuel is being wasted, and how much carbon has been emitted into the atmosphere by this vehicle with no pollution control equipment? 6:45AM June 20, 2007

 

 

 

 One of the DPW's many vehicles sits with engine running at the local donut shop with no occupants. On this day it was only one, but I have witnessed as many as 5 vehicles at the same donut shop at approximately the same time, all idling, within the past week. 6:15AM june 19th, 2007

 

  

 

The deputy fire chief drives approximately 7-9 miles from home to coffee shop to station, thus turning a less than one mile commute into a much longer journey. Let's buy them a coffee pot for the station and supply coffee. I'd bet we'd save $$$ in gas, and cut back on his carbon footprint, too!

Small things? Maybe. Multiply the number of employees, vehicles by days worked, and it adds up. I'll bet these problems exist in every town and hamlet in NH, heck, the country! Just imagine if we simply tightened up on the waste created by wasteful government activities all across the country what that could do!

 

 Warrant Article 30 in this year's town report

YMCA Takes Action; Good for Them!

girl texting
 

Well, well now! It appears that the Boulder, Colorado school administrators could learn a valuable lesson from the YMCA...Young Men's Christian Association.

click here for the story.

Isn't it too bad that our government in the State of NH doesn't ascribe to a similiar moral code?; i.e., your precious little 12 year old daughter can go get herself an abortion now all by her mature self without telling mommy and daddy but if she releases a balloon accidentally, you have to pay a $250 fine!

Hmmm, what do you think is more important? Do you think our state government has the appropriate focus on what's best for the citizens of NH?

While the best-known work by scientist, Simon LeVay, and most other scientists agree that there is no homosexual gene and that gay men are not born that way, our government headed up by the less-than-honorable Governor Lynch, not only want you to believe the lie that civil unions is a civil rights issue, they want us to be happy that they've written immorality into our state government and that it's the New Hampshire way?

You naive and apathetic citizens of our state should be outraged that you're continually lied to and mislead by half truths so our democrats can run amuke unabatted and unchallenged. How long are you going to let the state government know-it-alls, we know what's best for you politicians reign supreme while completely ignoring any majority opposing viewpoints of the citizens of the State of NH?

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely"! Our state government is corrupt and it's time for the citizens of NH to exercise our Rights of Rebellion since we're the only state who has the right under Article 10 of our Bill of Rights under our State Constituion.

More later on whether or not we should merely insist on reforming our existing government or perhaps it's just time for us to insist on a completely new government here in the granite state that pays attention to and acts appropriately on behalf of its citizens!

 

BY JUDY 

 

Civics and History - what a concept

(H/T: Sue for sending this along)

A teacher REALLY bringing home how things really work....wish this would be done more.

In September of 2005, a social studies schoolteacher from Arkansas did something not to be forgotten.  On the first day of school, with permission from the school superintendent, the principal, and the building supervisor, she took all of the desks out of the classroom.  The kids came into first period, they walked in; there were no desks.  They obviously looked around and said, "Where's our desks?"

The teacher said, "You can't have a desk until you tell me how you earn them."

They thought, "Well, maybe it's our grades."

"No," she said.

"Maybe it's our behavior."

And she told them, "No, it's not even your behavior."

And so they came and went in the first period, still no desks in the classroom.  Second period, same thing.  Third period.  By early afternoon, television news crews had gathered in the class to find out about this crazy teacher who had taken all the desks out of the classroom.  The last period of the day, the instructor gathered her class.

They were at this time sitting on the floor around the sides of the room.  She said, "Throughout the day no one has really understood how you earn the desks that sit in this classroom ordinarily.  Now I'm going to tell you."

She went over to the door of her classroom and opened it, and as she did, 27 U.S. veterans, wearing their uniforms, walked into that classroom, each one carrying a school desk.  And they placed those school desks in rows, and then they stood along the wall.  By the time they had finished placing the desks, those kids for the first time I think perhaps in their lives understood how they earned those desks.

Their teacher said, "You don't have to earn those desks.  These guys did it for you.  They put them out there for you, but it's up to you to sit here responsibly, to learn, to be good students and good citizens, because they paid a price for you to have that desk, and don't ever forget it."

True story, and go read the "back story".

Wish this was taught more often...

 

June 19, 2007

Not yours to give...

 Davey Crockett

Col. David Crockett
.
Several days back, I posted a piece about the Federal government giving out $40 coupons (my tax dollars!) to people in order to purchase digital-to analog converters for their TV sets rendered useless by the government-mandated switch to digital broadcast television.
.
It is apparent that our government is on an unrelenting quest for new "revenue streams" and tax increases to fund these kinds of crazy giveaways and handouts. Like the chicken and the egg, I'm not sure what comes first- new confiscatory taxes and fees, or the schemes that need the extracted dollars. It seems that, other than the ordinary people that I know in my everyday life (except for the TV coupons) , it has become ever more common to find the government bailing out anyone who makes bad choices, instead of allowing even the slightest bite of consequences.
.

Proof of income from borrowers. No penalties for early mortgage payments. And a guarantee that property taxes and insurance bills are covered. The Federal Reserve is considering these and other measures as a way to remedy the troubled market for high-risk, or subprime, mortgages. The central bank held an all-day hearing on the matter Thursday.

So far so good.

Lawmakers are pushing the Fed to act as late payments and new foreclosures on adjustable-rate home mortgages made to people with spotty credit climbed to all-time highs in the first three months of the year.

And I agree with the notion that risky loans should never get made to people who have no business getting one.

"We have had more than enough talk," Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said in a statement. His state has been hit particularly hard by a wave of foreclosures. "The Federal Reserve should have acted long ago to stamp out the abuses we have seen in Ohio and across the country."

Industry executives are urging the Fed not to limit the availability of credit by overreacting to the problems in the market, while consumer groups say the central bank should have cracked down on abusive mortgage practices years ago.

"Yeah Doug, so what? This all sounds like good stuff." I agree. The devil, I believe, will be in the details. As the pathway to the problem gets rightfully fixed, what do you think will happen when the already existing problem affects enough large banks and enough defaulting poor people? My money's on the Democrats and their "moderate" comrades in the GOP somehow underwriting this impending disaster with taxpayer dollars. You watch...
.
Can you imagine what the Founding Fathers of America, and those involved with the writing of the Constitution would think about this if they were to somehow pay us a visit in these times? What would Davy Crockett say? Have you ever read the famous speech he gave to Congress about government handouts and his explanation why he so opposed them-- "Not Yours to Give"? Ask yourself if TV coupons and mortgage bailouts squares with his sentiments...
One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The speaker was just about to put the question when Crockett arose:
.
"Mr. Speaker--I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not the power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member on this floor knows it.
.
We have the right as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I ever heard that the government was in arrears to him.
.
"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please.
Read the whole story here. There was a time in this country when this particular piece of historical literature was widely read by students in most public and private schools. Nowadays, it is usually only studied by home-schooled students. After all, we couldn't allow too many people in this country to actually start believing in the ideals expressed by Crockett-- that would spoil everything! (the march to socialism and TV coupons)
 
BY DOUG 

 

Do they ever stop? Trying to take our money, that is.

Being a denizen of the Blogosphere is both exciting and depressing. On the one hand, to have a world of news, knowledge and thought bouncing about the entire country and globe between all men & women great and small brings a new perspective on events to the common folks. The downside, however, is that you find out that there is even more bad news out there than you had ever imagined. We know with even more clarity the extent to which our elected politicians, on BOTH sides of the aisle, are sticking it to us.
.
At every turn, their actions and moves seemingly take aim at anybody that becomes successful or productive in some profitable endeavour here in modern America. There is no end to the growing amount of money (tax dollars) needed to fund socialism here in America. And no end to the creative ways politicians will find to get it.
 
IRS
 
 
.
BDP, writing over at one of our favorite blogs, AnkleBitingPundits.com, sadly observes:
Not much here is surprising given the 2006 election results, given that much of their rhetoric and motivation appears to be to screw it to large companies that, you know, hire people and power our economy.
.
But what’s really galling is that (again) some Republicans appear to be joining their crusade, most likely because they think it plays well back home, even though the bill would hurt the overall economy.
Click here to read his entire post on the latest example of government's ongoing assault upon our  most productive and innovative citizens...
 
 
 

June 18, 2007

Cynical? You bet!

The latest shot at 'comprehensive immigration reform" is still making its way throught he legislative process.  While I oppose this bill on moral grounds ("no citizenship for lawbreakers - I have to suffer the consequences of my actions if I break the law ->why shouldn't they??) as it sets up special treatment for folks that should not be here, I also oppose this law for the tremendous hypocrisy that our political elite in Washington are trying to pull.

As can be seen at various other blogs out there, a dirty little secret is beginning to become known -> we cannot process all those Z-visa applications int eh time frames being mandated even if we wanted to in (which is basically a "get in free card").

I feel for the clerks that will have to deal with crush of folks coming in trying to get that Z-visa, especially if many of the applicants use false documents. Kinda like the poor Border Patrol folks in the video below (click on bailout - I didn't want to spoil it...):

Bailout

One cannot "compromise" when it comes to the implementation of the road map to an income tax in NH!

Our friend former NH Sen Rob Boyce (Oh, the good 'ole days...) submits the following in response to an op-ed in Sunday's Union Leader. Judging by it and Ed's post below this one, the Union Leader (to which I am and have been a subscriber for roughly 19 years) take on the failure (thankfully) of the latest ed funding amendment is going over like the proverbial flatulence in a wetsuit...
The Union Leader is criticizing the Republicans in the legislature for not voting for a “compromise” constitutional amendment. My question is what compromise amendment?
.
In the House, there was a Democrat written and proposed amendment pushed by the Governor. Only a few less than half the Democrats voted for it. Before a Republican written amendment could be brought forward a Rino (not coincidentally the son of the last Governor to be elected without taking the anti income tax pledge - the “Union Leader” pledge) made a motion that killed the ability of the Republicans to even be heard!
.
So there certainly was not a “compromise” there - if only one side of an argument is heard - what is there to compromise. Maybe in the old Soviet Union or in current Iran a one voice debate can be called a compromise. Very Orwellian don't you think!
.
Then the Senate Democrats put forward the same Democrat amendment in the Senate. After a Republican amendment was proposed and voted down the Democrats’ was voted but did not receive enough votes to proceed and was tabled. Again where is that considered a compromise?
.
The fact is that Gov. Lynch and the Democrats in the House and Senate do not really want to fix the problem of the Supreme Court redefining simple words to suit their own convoluted ideas of education and taxation. The Democrats see the current situation as a way to force an income tax upon the people of New Hampshire - people who have consistently voted NO! in every way they have been allowed. They voted Governor Peterson from office at the war cry of “Axe The tax” from Mel Thompson. They demolished every gubernatorial candidate who even suggested that such a tax might be acceptable.
.
The Democrats have now passed HB 927 which is purported to be a definition of an adequate education - the price tag for which they are craftily not revealing until after this quagmire bill is signed into law. The few estimates that have been put forward are for an increase in state spending on the order of over $800 million a year. There of course is no extra $800 million in the state treasury and that means a new tax - and there is only one that can be quickly implemented for that amount - the income tax.
.
So Union Leader, where is your leadership on that bill? Where is your outcry on that road map to an income tax?
Hon. Rob Boyce. Visit his Blog www.robboyce.com/blog and his web site www.robboyce.com
 
NH Map
 
BY DOUG 
 

THE UNION LEADER TAX HIKE

THE UNION LEADER TAX HIKE

In its lead editorial in the Sunday News of June 17, 2007, the Manchester Union Leader continued to pillory certain Republicans for acting like, well, Republicans by opposing the misbegotten constitutional amendment crafted by ersatz Republican Mike Whalley’s crack team of legal experts.  They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.  In this case, it appears that one can say that hubris also makes strange bedfellows.   

The Manchester Union Leader has been calling for an amendment since Claremont II was issued in 1997.  In a recent paroxysm of monomania that would put Captain Ahab to shame, New Hampshire’s ersatz conservative newspaper, in order to get its precious constitutional amendment passed, has taken a dive between the same political bed-sheets under which lie liberal Democrats like Martha Fuller Clark and Peter Burling  The Union Leader’s June 17th editorial, like most of its recent editorials on education funding, simply parrots the gassy talking-points incessantly ventilated by liberal Democrats like Fuller Clark and Burling – if the Republicans don’t vote for this amendment, we’re going to have an income tax and it’s all the Republicans fault; if the Republicans don’t vote for this amendment, we’re going to have an income tax and it’s all the Republicans fault; if the Republicans don’t vote for this amendment, we’re going to have an income tax and it’s all the Republicans fault!    What poppycock.

If we do end up with an income tax, the fault lies not with the Republicans who opposed the putrid Whalley amendment but with the Manchester Union Leader and its liberal Democrat political bedmates because they have been spewing misinformation about the role of the Supreme Court in our system of government at a pace akin to how the juiced-up Barry Bonds hit home runs.  The Supreme Court is just that, a supreme court.  It is not the supreme branch of government.  It has no lawful authority to tell the other branches to impose any tax, never mind a broad-based tax.  It has no lawful authority to tell the other branches to spend anything on public education, never mind an amount that the Supreme Court in its infinite wisdom deems to be adequate.  And it has no lawful authority to tell the other branches to define an adequate education, never mind set a deadline for the other branches to do so.

But one would never know this from reading the Manchester Union Leader lately.  Rather, the Union Leader has adopted the notion of judicial supremacy supported only by the most liberal of liberal Democrats.  In its June 13th editorial, the Union Leader actually claimed that the Supreme Court’s education funding decisions represent amendments of the State Constitution!  Talk about either being clueless or being depraved!  The Supreme Court does not have the power to amend the constitution.  Only we the people have the power to amend the constitution.  The Supreme Court’s education funding decisions are not amendments of the State Constitution; they are abuses of the judicial power.

What’s behind all the editorial nonsense being ventilated in the Manchester Union Leader is the fear that the Legislature will pass an income tax if the Supreme Court decrees that none of the cost of the bloated definition of an adequate education recently passed by the Democrat legislature can be paid for with local property taxes, and the voters will just acquiesce.  The Democrats supporting the Whalley amendment are afraid of just the opposite.  Their fear is that if the 2008 election is about the income tax, either enacting or repealing one, some Republican may emerge who will oppose the income tax, notwithstanding the big, bad Supreme Court, and be a big hit with the voters.

The Manchester Union Leader’s June 17th editorial repeats the canard that local control over public education is a myth.  It is not.  While it is true that there has been a State Board of Education and State standards since 1919, it has been local decision-makers that have decided how much to spend to implement these standards.  This degree of local control is what has kept New Hampshire’s tax burden low relative to the other states.  What we need to be doing, if the goal is to improve our children’s education, is decreasing State control over education.

By championing an amendment that would write an antiquated and demonstrably failed model of public education into the State Constitution, the Manchester Union Leader has exposed a real myth, however.  That is that the Union Leader speaks for conservatives.

 

BY ED 

MTNP - 06/16/07 Broadcast

Meet The New Press
(A radio show by bloggers about the goings on in blogosphere)
WEMJ 1490 Saturdays 11am-1pm (EDT)
Streaming Live!

Podcasts

To play (or "stream") a clip now, just click on it.  To download it to your PC, right click on it and tell the process where to save the file for you.

Yup, another broadcast in the can!  We had Alec O'Meara (Gilford Steamer / Winnisquam Echo / Meredith News) talking about the small town kerfuffle he started, Liz Mair of GOPPROGRESS.COM talking about healthcare reforms (??), Rudy, Fred, Union votes, and Hillary on pork.  Also on the show were Sue Peterson and Karan Thurston of Blue Star Moms NH

Week of 06/16/07


Hour 1 here                                                Hour 2 - here


     Hour 1

           MTNP Love for Pat  
           Welcome to new 'Grokster - Judy Paris          Part 1   Part 2 
           Alec O'Meara - Main Street Awards, Meredith Salary Comparisons   Part 1     Part 2

    Hour 2

           MTNP Love for Pat  Part 2
           Blue Star Mother - Karen Thurston  -  POW/MIA  Dedication and upcoming Some gave
                    some, Some gave all rally
           Always a Blue Star Mom - Pease Greeter Sue Peterson (and Mom of Fury!)
           Discussion - couple of Judy's posts
           Liz Mair of GOPProgress - Hillary's Pork, Healthcare reform (?),  Rudy, Fred,  free
                    pass for unions            Part 1      Part 2
          New NH GOP Site stars Doug's YouTube video interview of Senator Sununu (R-NH)


Schlubcam vids!  Some partial clips - a little of what goes on during the breaks and a lot on the Blue Star Mother activities.  See if you can see Judy and Sue chair-dancing!

            11:45am Break
            Blue Star Mom Karen Thurston
            11:30am Break - Doug, Judy, Sue
            11:30am Break - Doug, Judy, Sue talk about Olympics
            Judy about awards
            Judy and Sue listening to Alec O'Meara on the phone
            Karen Thurston - Part 2

June 17, 2007

Hodes, Shea-Porter: When they're not harming our troops, they're helping lawbreakers...

Sanctuary map
 
.
A regular reader dropped us a note expressing his displeasure with a particular vote cast by NH's two Democrat members of the House of Representatives. Unfortunately for all of us, Cong. Paul Hodes and his fellow left-wing sidekick Cong. Carol Shea-Porter are simply doing the bidding of their liberal masters-- the Pelosi wing and the Moveon.org crowd. Based on their record thus far, it seems no amount of criticism and complaint will deviate them from the "destroy America as we know it" path they've chosen...
Guys,
 
Saw this today and thought you might find it interesting that BOTH Hodes and Shea-Porter voted against this portion of HR 2638 (Tancredo Amendment).  It's Roll Call 485 from Friday's session if you need to look it up:

H.AMDT.294 (A045)
Amends: H.R.2638
Sponsor: Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] (offered 6/15/2007)
.
AMENDMENT PURPOSE: An amendment numbered 7 printed in the Congressional Record to prohibit funds to be used in contravention of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.  
.
What this basically means is that the Amendment Tancredo submitted (and which passed at least in the House) is that any so-called "sanctuary city" which harbors illegals would not receive DHS funding for 2008.
.
Some of those cities include such places as Phoenix, Los Angeles, New Haven, CT, Cambridge, MA, but even such places as Portland ME, Salt Lake City, and Jackson Hole, Wyoming.  Fortunately, no cities or town in NH are currently listed (per OJJPAC), but how long will it be until we DO have to do something about this?
.
Guys, this is one of the main reasons I left California--liberal policies which gave a damn about good, honest, hard-working, tax-paying CITIZENS, and gave our rights to those who crossed our borders illegally, filling our schools, prisons, hospital emergency rooms, and roads, all the while demanding more and more, which the socialists in Sacramento were all to happy to provide.
.
These two (Hodes and Porter) have GOT to go.  I'm not letting either one of them get away with this.
.
Randy R.
This amendment seems like a reasonable idea to me. If the Feds can deny federal monies to states for things like a lack of seatbelt laws and such, why not in the area of homeland security? Why dole out government bucks to combat terror threats to communities that openly refuse to enforce laws that are obviously related?
.
Looking over the roll call, many Democrats voted in favor of this measure. Why couldn't our two NH representatives join them? Actually, none of us watching the actions of these two should be surprised. It falls in line with all the other positions these two moonbats have taken. Poor Randy-- he thought he left California behind. Instead, he comes here to NH where our newly-elected Congressmen have decided to make Nancy Pelosi's San-Fran values their guiding light. Fool the voters once...
 
BY DOUG 

POW/MIA Freedom Ride-- The Movie

As Skip reported in this post, on Thursday, the Lakes Region of NH played host to the 18th annual Freedom Ride sponsored by the Northeast Network POW/MIA. Here is a YouTube of the many hundreds of bikes and bikers, along with other supporters as they arrived at Heskey Park in Meredith, NH for the enhanced version of the longest continuous POW/MIA vigil in the country. The video captures the size and number of participants, as well as the opening prayer of the ceremony.
.
The event consisted of several parts and many speakers who were very moving. The Blue and Gold Star Mothers of NH were honored as part of the ceremony, with everyone's attention focused on those yet to return: The POWs and MIAs. In the next few days, I will be adding several more YouTubes of the event, featuring the speeches themselves, which were very moving and powerful.
 
YOU TUBE GOES HERE
 
 
 
BY DOUG
  

"When u pray, praise God- He protected me last night..."

Med evac
 
"Extraction"- Photo courtesy defendamerica.mil
.
Since the founding of the 'Grok, Skip and I have been blessed by the many new friends we have met as a result. We got to know Sue Peterson thanks to our mutual friend Karen Thurston and the NH Blue Star Mothers. Sue's son Alex is currently serving in Iraq. If you really wish to get a true feel for what the sense of duty, honor, and sacrifice is, get to know someone with a family member who is an actively serving soldier in the US armed forces-- especially a mother.
.
Sue was kind enough to write a brief note about an email exchange she had this week with her son...

 

"Look to the Lord and his strength; seek His face always"  1 Chronicles 16:11 and the note with it says...."Should we feel at times disheartened and discouraged, a simple movement of heart toward God will renew our powers.  Whatever He may demand of us, He will give us at the moment the strength and courage that we need."
 
I just wanted to share part of what Alex was able to share with me about 12:40am (EST) or 0900 (Baghdad) on Monday ....I was sleeping and heard the familiar and lovely "cash register" sound that indicates that Alex had signed on to AOL Instant Message...
 
and here is what transpired...
 
Alex:   when u pray, praise God he protected me last night - we went  on a Medivac run and the enemy must have seen our helicopter land because as we loaded up the wounded, mortars rained in on us and we had no where to run to because we were in an open area.  The mortars landed behind, to the right, to the left, and in front of us.  Some were only about 40m's away - but none of us got hurt.  T hey hit in a circle around us and not in the middle where we were
 
Then I told Alex.....

you know...tonight before i went to sleep you were on my mind so much...i just prayed for a hedge of protection around you...so...praise God for His protection.  I am so grateful for the prayers of so many...and thankful for this answered prayer.  Also...who knows how many are praying for the soldiers  you are with....
 
You know, I thought if I ever heard something like this, I would be so scared, crying, etc....but, I have to say that what it did was give me comfort.....comfort in knowing that no matter what....Alex is in God's hand and nothing can take Alex from Him.  Also...I know that nothing is going to touch Alex that does not pass through the loving hand of God.   So...praise God for His protection and mercy...and thank ya'll for your continued prayers and support. 
Just a little insight as to what transpires between a mother, her soldier-child, and God. I stand in awe of such people...

 

 

BY DOUG 

Amazing Dancing Horse! Happy Father's Day!

Being an equestrian myself, I was completely amazed and inspired by this dancing horse. Here's my Father's Day gift to the Dads of Distinction: Skip, Doug and Patrick....ENJOY! Just imagine what you can accomplish as a father to your children, if it's possible to teach a horse how to dance!

Click here to watch one of the most spectacular horses I've ever seen. And you thought horses couldn't dance?

For those of you who are unfamiliar with training horses, let me just say that there has got to be literally thousands of hours spent in training this magnificent horse to dance! I guarantee you will  feel joyous watching this video and whatever cares weigh on you today will be, at least, momentarily insignificant.

This reminds me of something Ronald Reagan said who perhaps also understood that horses, like people, are spiritual!

Ronald Reagan ... I've often said there's nothing better for the inside of a man than the outside of a horse. ...
  

Happy Father's Day! Inspire a child today!

 

BY JUDY 

Laconia NH Motorcycle Week - Meredith's Hesky Park POW/MIA Freedom Ride/ memorial dedication

This past Thursday night was a collaboration between the Northeast Network POW/MIA organization and the NH Chapters of the Blue and Gold Star Mothers in dedicating the POW/MIA monument.  Located in Meredith's Hesky Park (at Meredith Bay on "The Big Lake"), the Northeast Network has held a vigil for our nation's POW/MIA armed service personnel EVERY THURSDAY NIGHT FOR 18 YEARS.

The last few years during Motorcyle Week, a run has been done to honor those that have been willing to give their all - and may have.  However, we pray that they have not and that sometime soon, they will be returned to their families.

Below are some stills that I took at the rally - Doug videotaped it and will be putting clips up soon.

Big American flag

Old Glory flown by the Ashland and New Durham Fire Depts.  Security provided by Meredith Police and NH State Police

 

NH National Guard Hummer 

NH National Guard Hummer, driven by Sgt Thurston

(His Mom is Karen Thurston, a Blue Star Mother who assisted in setting up this event)

 

More pictures after the jump  

 

Bikers starting to arrive at Hesky Park!
 
 
PFC Nick Cornoyer's Truck 

 

 PFC Nick Cornoyer's Truck
 
 

 Bike with BIG American Flag

 

 Bikers coming through!

 

Bike with POW flag

  Large POW/MIA - American Flag

 

Trike 

 Trike Time

 

Ed Engler 

The 'Grok's friend - Laconia Daily Sun Editor - Ed Engler!

 

POW Honor Guard 

Honor Guard

 

Helicoptor honor formation 

Helo fly over - splitting off!

 

KC-135 honor flyover 

KC-135 Flyover

 

Bob Jones - Northeast Network POW-MIA 

Bob Jones - Northeast Network POW-MIA

 

Piper Leading Blue Star Moms and Gold Star Moms

Blue and Gold Star Moms escorted by a piper

 

Blue Star Moms 

Blue Star Moms - Karen Thurston (Left) and Sue Peterson (Right)

 

Vets thanking the Blue and Gold Star Moms 

Vets thanking the Blue and Gold Star Moms

 

June 16, 2007

Pay attention to the [wizard] behind that curtain [microphone]...

 
GraniteGrok "wizard" Skip Murphy
.
As we have eclipsed the twelfth month of operation here at the 'Grok, I would be remiss if I neglected to thank my biz partner Skip, without whom none of this would be possible. Oh sure, I could have a blog at BlogSpot or some other templated arrangement, but it just wouldn't be the same. Thanks to Skip's technical wizardry, we have this really fantastic place to rant, rave, and inform known as GraniteGrok, which is followed and joined by it's offspring, GilfordGrok.
.
Then came the radio program, "Meet the New Press". Once launched over the traditional broadcast airwave, we naturally wanted to start livestreaming so that our friends from all around the Blogosphere could tune in as well. "No can do," said the radio station. Enter Skip Murphy. After hours of testing, inquiry, and experimentation, he launched the livestreaming capability that we now enjoy.
.
The bottom line is that since I have met him, it seems as if nearly all things are possible. Whatever we seem to cook up in our little shlub brains, he figures out a way to "git 'er done". We used to joke about a livestream "ShlubCam" to allow our radio listeners to watch the program as it happens. Well, we're nearly there, as Skip, up to his usual beta tests and trials, has just about put all the pieces in place to make that a reality too. Oh, and he's a pretty smart commentator and blogger too!
.
For all that you do, Skip,

A big THANKS and a "hat" tip too! 

(Oh, and really Skip, that hat is YOU!)
 
BY DOUG 

The boys [and girls] are back in town... It's time to MEET the NEW PRESS!

 

.
This week's broadcast version of the New Media brings an array of items for your consideration. As always, thanks to the technical wizardry and analytical skills of Skip, if you are beyond the broadcast area of Newstalk 1490 WEMJ, simply click here for instructions on how to connect and listen via livestream. (Podcasts here)
.
This week we mix a fair amount of "local" in with the usual fare. While it may not be completely relevant to where you live, the stories will be familiar, no doubt. The politicians and bureacratic busybodies can be found everywhere!
Holy bat-guano, Batman! What a show! It all starts at 11AM EST today. Tune in if you're in Central NH at NewsTalk 1490AM WEMJ or live on the 'Net here...

 

June 15, 2007

CONTROVERSY! Boulder, CO, Manch, NH & little Sutton, NH

Yikes! Yikes! Yikes!

WARNING: SOME OF THIS MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR WORK OR FAMILY VIEWING!!!

These various stories, click here, here, here and here, remind me of a personal experience I had several years ago while substitute teaching at Kearsarge Regional High School, Sutton, NH. Bill O'Reilly made the following comment on Fox News on June 13th:

"This could happen where you live!" Click here to go to Fox News, then look on the right and click on "Watch Fox News Video", click the bullet underneath titled: "O'Reilly" Boulder High Controversy" to watch the actual video

Ah, duh, it already has happened here!

While I don't recall what class I was teaching nor the exact topic of why we were gathered in the required auditorium assembly along with many other classes, I do recall it was supposed to be about population growth issues, natural resources, etc. The name of the organization was long but did not indicate anything about what was their real agenda unlike most people in Manchester, and just about everywhere, knowing that Planned Parenthood is pro-abortion.

There were several speakers. One Man had a bunch of charts showing population growth, affect on natural resources, and other pretty boring statistical information, etc. I could see my class, and others drifting, but that's ok. Not every subject holds everyone's peak interest and I even found myself thinking about other things although I had a bit of an uncomfortable feeling about where all this was leading based on some of the things that were said by several speakers. You know, you get that "feeling" that there's some kind of set up taking place.

Here's the YIKES! An elderly, okay more elderly than me, woman began speaking....she started to tell a personal story, pretty graphically...something about how it was too bad that she didn't have access to an abortion, and went on for a minute or so before I realized that she was completely off topic and preaching inappropriate subject matter for "MY" public school that I pay tax dollars to support. I looked around for a teacher in attendance to speak up and get her back on topic. Since none of them did, I interrupted the woman, as politely as I could, and asked her to please get back on topic rather than encouraging abortion, and by the way some of us disagree with abortion, which was not what she was there to do.

She temporarily got back on topic then drifted to an even more emotionally charged personal issue regarding abortion and coat hangers.

I quickly hustled (like I ran, dude) down to the principal's office not far away, told him that I thought he should immediately come to the auditorium to listen and intervene and get this woman either back on topic permanentaly or possibly shut her down and explained my reasoning, etc. that I did not believe school policy allowed her to be pushing an abortion agenda. The principal concurred.

I went back to the auditorium. I noticed the principal arrived and was standing near the stage.

The woman was still talking about abortion but had digressed even further to a story about her mother, more graphic detail, and something about it being too bad that mom couldn't have had an abortion...sorry, but my memory is a bit hazy on all of the details, but you get the jest...other than that she was encouraging abortion again and telling her very one-sided story.

I kept my eye on the principal whom I was certain was going to do something about shutting this woman down. When I realized he was apparently not going to do anything and the woman got more emotional and angry...well, you know me, I just can't keep my mouth shut sometimes, but under these circumstances, I felt completely justified in again interrupting the woman and reminding her that she was off topic again and while she may think abortion is the answer, it was merely her personal opinion and school policy did not allow her to push this particular agenda on a captive school audience in lieu of the topic that her group advertished they were coming in to discuss. I warned her that it was completely wrong and if she continued to be allowed to push her pro-abortion agenda, I requested equal time to respond with my anti-abortion, pro-life viewpoint before the assembly was dismissed. 

Most of the students in the assembly started clapping and saying something like "go, Mrs. Paris", etc. The principal finally stepped in but, in my opinion, did a very soft-soap job of finally ending the assembly and not really clearly stating that the woman was completely off base and should not have been allowed to discuss abortion.

We all started filing out and a bunch of kids started high fiving me in passing and saying things like "way to go, Mrs. Paris", she was wrong to do what she did and it was good that you spoke up and tried to get her back on the advertised topic. "How come Principal Fitzgerald or any of the "real" teachers didn't do anything?" some of the kids wanted to know. Scary, eh?

Obviously, I spoke with the principal later and he made some ridiculous comment that he really didn't think it was really all that bad, although if she wanted to talk about encouraging abortions, she should have signed up for the day when different groups are allowed to come in and talk about anything they want including controversial subjects. During that day, name escapes me, students are allowed to pick and choose what they want to attend or even choose not to attend anything.

I signed up for a pro-life topic and teen sex discussion. See, I'm not really that much of a prude and actually one of my favorite subjects to sub for was "health class" where alot of good, factual sexual information is supplied in a very non-biased way; just the facts and the kids are very mature and ask some very compelling questions on a piece of paper anonymously, that are read and answered so as to avoid having any of them becoming embarrassed because of their question. I think this is an excellent approach and I can remember dispelling a belief that you would get pregnant taking a bath in the same bath water after your brother had used it. Clearly some parents need to do a much better job of providing sexual education to their children I found out.

Now, much like Boulder, CO or Manchester, NH, the students in this controversial assembly were required to attend the assembly which is part of why I had a problem with it.

The one good thing that came out of this whole fiasco was that the school required a written outline of topics prior to approving any outside group being allowed to bend students' ears. One bad thing was that the very young teacher who had invited this group began blubbering after returning to class and putting on a show in front of her students rather than dealing in a mature manner with the issue. She was also, I was told, very angry (go figure?) at me although she never confronted me. I found out later that she knew exactly what the agenda was so perhaps the over-the-top emotional display was merely embarrassment that she got caught.

My bottom line here is this: if more people don't do something about what is allowed to go on in our public schools that we taxpayers are supporting, it's only going to get worse.

Case in point: Ron Tunning while on the Meet The New Press radio program (podcast here) made what I consider a startling statement during the radio show about "recruiting" students to join his homosexual group as though it's like others recruiting for the baseball team! Since when are our public schools allowed to recruit kids, presummably during school time, to become homosexuals? Although in Boulder it apparently isn't a problem even with some of the parents.....

Since one of the parent's comments was that the Boulder High situation was "enlightening!" Yeah, it's really enlightening to tell kids it's okay to use illegal drugs, have sex men with men, etc.! I just must not be quite enlightened enough.

So, here's just another example of how parents' rights are being infringed upon while we're paying for it to happen no less, and especially here in the State of NH where parental rights have been taken away so minor children do not have to tell their parents before they can get an abortion and a homosexual agenda is being encouraged and supported by our own government.

Please keep your eyes open for my upcoming blog on NH's Right of Rebellion under our State Constitution. We are the only State who has such a "right" and I'm beginning to believe and becoming more and more convinced that we need to start exercising our rights as citizens and take back control of our state and government that appears to be becoming more and more secular progressive.

Article 10 of our constitution's Bill of Rights partially states:

"Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government..."

I believe that perhaps the majority of the people of NH have just about had enough of our current state government and their new laws and possible perversion. What do you think? I really would love to hear your comments, pro and con as always. Is it time for us to rebel? Keep in mind YOU might have to do something....yeah, yeah, I know, I'm busy too!

And, no, the Boulder situtation is not Bill O'Reilly's fault....when are adults going to learn to accept responsibility for themselves instead of blaming someone else for their actions? I agree that these faculty members should have been fired on the spot or even given twenty lashes with a wet noodle....just something should be done to prevent this from happening in the future.

 

BY JUDY 

June 14, 2007

Like a phoenix rising... Al Gore?

Statue Angel
 
.
As I have noted here, here, and here, there is a very good chance that AlGore could toss his hat into the '08 presidential ring. He's a movie star. He'a an author. He's a credible candidate, with a sizeable number of people believing he won the 2000 election. My guess is that he could potentially regain nearly every one of the voters who cast a ballot for him in that race. With global warming as the cause du jour, and the attendant hysteria continuing with no end in sight, an AlGore cast as the hero ready to save the day could very well be a shoo-in for the White House. I'm not the only one that is predicting this. Bill Clinton thinks it's possible Gore might consider jumping in, and one blogger is predicting a Gore/Obama ticket. Yikes!!
 
Al Gore       Barack Obama
 

I want my [federally subsidized] D-TV!

Television
.
When my friend Tom first alerted me to this, I said, "Send me a link. The US government is giving away voucher coupons so that people can buy analog to digital TV converters? No way!" But alas, it's true. According to a March story in DailyWireless.org,
Starting Jan. 1, 2008, all U.S. households will be eligible to request up to two $40 coupons to be used toward the purchase of up to two, digital-to-analog converter boxes, while the initial $990 million allocated for the program is available.
.
Under the rules, all U.S. households will be able to apply for up to two $40 coupons to defray the cost of a basic digital-to-analog converter box during the program’s initial phase, in which up to 22.5 million coupons are expected to be available. March 31, 2009 is the last day to make the requests. Boxes are expected to cost between $50 and $70 apiece.
But why? Why do people need such things, and why on earth is the federal government involved in something like this? Well, duh... it's because thanks to the government, that awesome TV you just bought at the ElectronicsSuperDuperWarehouse Bargain Outlet for a hundred and fifty bucks is going to be obsolete on February 17th, 2009. You knew that, didn't you?
.
What?! You didn't know your current TV is going to be worthless after that date? Don't feel bad, you're not alone. And your friendly electronics retailer hasn't helped you realize this either...
 The big names in consumer-electronics retailing are selling analog TVs without alerting buyers that the sets won’t work without conversion devices after mid-February 2009, according to the Federal Communications Commission.
.

The FCC this week warned Best Buy, Circuit City Stores, CompUSA, Kmart and RadioShack that they face $11,000-a-day fines, up to $97,000, unless they prominently display notices alerting shoppers that broadcasters are switching to all-digital signals on Feb. 17, 2009.

Heh. And all this time you thought that it was totally excellent that the new TV you recently bought was practically a steal, when actually, you are getting screwed by the retailer who is selling you something that will be rendered obsolete in Feb. 2009. Don't worry though, 'cause good 'ole Uncle Sam will bail you out of your dilemma...  even if you don't need the help. Again, from DailyWireless.org:
The coupons have no income limit, meaning that millionaires would be as eligible for taxpayer-provided discounts as someone living below the poverty line.
And you thought the nanny state had already thought of everything!
 

NH POW/MIA Vigil & Freedom Ride is almost here!

POW/MIA VIGIL AND FREEDOM RIDE

POW/MIA flag 

JUNE 14th ~ THURSDAY
-Leave Lowe's lot in Gilford @ 6:00PM.
-Ride to Meredith.
-The vigil starts @ 7:00 PM HESKY PARK MEREDITH
For Information on the “Freedom Ride” Call
Bob Jones ~ 279-6637 or nhbluestarmom(at)metrocast.net
.
Special guests will be the Blue and Gold Star Mothers of N.H.
“Who better understands the issue”.
.
Flag Day!!! Bring your flags and wave them high! 
.
Dedication of the POW/MIA Memorial ~ Blue Star Mother Holly Tetreault
Pledge of Allegiance ~ Natalie Cournoyer, Pfc. Nicholas Cournoyer’s sister
Introduction: Don Amorosi ~ Northeast POW/MIA Network of New York

Guest Speakers:
Karen Thurston ~ President of the Blue Star Mothers of N.H.
Natalie Healy ~ Gold Star Mother of Navy Seal Dan Healy
Gail Hughes Morgan ~ Gold Star Mother of LCpl. Sean Hughes
Sue Peterson ~ Blue Star Mother ~ Message on behalf of Maupin Family
Trish Burnett ~ Daughter of Col. Sheldon Burnett, a Viet Nam ~ MIA. Col. Burnett’s remains were returned to N.H. in 2004 (Introduced by NH Rolling Thunder)
.
Music and MC ~ Artie Atkinson, Northeast POW/MIA Network, MA
National Anthem by ~ Norm Johnson
Bagpiper ~ Sgt. Kenneth Welsby, NH National Guard
Fly Over ~ 7:00PM Sharp!!
Benediction and Invocation ~ Artie Atkinson

 BY DOUG

For Those Who Have Paid The Ultimate Price!

Bring tissues, then click here

 

BY JUDY 

June 13, 2007

Biology and Sexual Orientation

What's this prove? click here to read the entire article on whether or not homosexuals are "born that way."

You guessed it; there is still no consensus among scientists.

In fact, if you don't want to read the entire article, although I encourage you to as it's fasinating, here's the conclusion made by Simon LaVay when he studied brain structures:

"It's important to stress what I didn't find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. ... Since I look at adult brains, we don't know if the differences I found were there at birth or if they appeared later."

According to these researchers:

"Most scientists agree that it is unlikely that there is a single "gay gene" that determines something as complex as a homosexual orientation, and that it is more likely to be the result of an interaction of genetic, biological and environment factors."

Don't get mad at me, I'm just a messenger of something I found while searching the internet.

For obvious reasons, many homosexuals, mostly to advance their cause, use the argument that they were "born that way" as it's more "acceptable" to them and indicates that they have no control over their sexual orientation so they should be allowed to marry, etc. or enter into a civil union as has just been approved by Gov. Lynch here in NH. 

While this research is certainly not conclusive and further research is ongoing, it does make a good case for homosexuality not being a civil rights issue as is being born black, hispanic, female, etc...something well-proven that no one has any control over.

 

BY JUDY 

Follow up: Civil Unions

gay men
 

Please first check out my original post here on June 7, Where's the Danger with Civil Unions and some comments you may find interesting.

Hmmm...I sent this letter to the editor at the Monitor yesterday:

Naïve people just keep proving many of us “Right!”

            I love being “called out” on things. Several letters to the editor called out those of us opposed to Civil Unions to explain our position. We’d love to!

            We have many solid arguments backed up by documentation; however, the Concord Monitor, my naïve little news junkies, don’t always print our letters.

            Is it really any wonder why the Monitor and other newspapers are in financial trouble? When you have the NY Times printing a major terrorist threat to blow up JFK Airport on page 37, doesn’t it make you wonder whether you’re getting any real, honest news or just someone’s biased opinion for marketing or political gain?

            Try the blogosphere if you’re interested in both sides of a story.

Subsequently, the Monitor did, in fact, print today a shortened version of my original letter, click here, but ask yourself this question: what's missing from my original letter posted here on the Grok? Was it important supportive information that was left out? Did you get the whole story?

 

You decide.

 

BY JUDY 

 

Draft Shaheen a "spur of the moment" thing? Hardly...

Update:

Well, Kathy Sullivan visited the 'Grok and left a comment:

When you register a domain name, you can pay an extra ten bucks to have a service act as the registered address for the domain so that your personal information doesn't appear on the internet when people like you go looking. I paid the extra ten bucks when I registered the name so my