blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Now!Hampshire
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

NH Conservative Bloggers


Atlantic Ave
Bogieblog
Citizens for Reasonable&Fair Taxes-
                   Croyden
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)
Drew Cline
COTErack
Ed Mosca
GilfordGrok
Granite State Pundit
Moultonboro Speaks
NH Commentary
NH Election
NH Insider
NH Watchdog
No Looking Backwards
One Voice In Gilford
Politizine
Pun Salad
Radioactive Liberty
RBOBlog
RedHampshire
Rob Boyce Blog
TBONH
The Blogging Councilor
Weekend Pundit

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Think Tanks


Josiah Bartlett Center for Public
                     Policy
NH Watchdog
Cornerstone Policy Research
Heritage Foundation

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of NH Taxpayers
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Friend or Foe?


Blue Hampshire

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market, Limited Govt


Sam Adams Alliance blogs


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Overlawyered
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr
Mark Levin
The Rush Limbaugh Show

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« March 2007 | Main | May 2007 »

April 29, 2007

Buckley Berates Voters during Civil Unions Vote?

I would like to know more about this little nugget from Tom Fahey’s State House Dome column in this morning’s Union Leader:

[Democrat Party Chairman Ray] Buckley had made the only outburst during Thursday's Senate debate. As Sen. Martha Fuller Clark finished her speech, he loudly told two men behind him to keep their comments to themselves. He said the two had engaged in a running critique of Clark's remarks. Troopers quickly quieted things down and the Senate voted 14-10 to pass the bill.

I wish Doug Lambert had been there with his video camera.  It is certainly possible that the two men seated behind Chairman Buckley were being unruly and obnoxious.  But knowing Chairman Buckley as I do, I think it is far more likely that they were expressing legitimate disagreement with Sen. Fuller Clark’s statement in hushed tones and Chairman Buckley popped. The fact that troopers needed to quiet things down only after Chairman Buckley entered the “discussion” lends credence to my bias.

Chairman Buckley’s outburst is darkly reminiscent of Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter’s behavior last February in which she is alleged to have called and berated two women who have family members serving in Iraq.

Has New Hampshire elected a bunch of liberal bullies to run the state?  Sheesh. If Chairman Buckley or Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter ever accept our numerous invitations to appear on "Meet the New Press," they should know that we only engage in polite reasoned dialogue and bullying behavior is not acceptable on the program.

April 28, 2007

WHY IT'S BLUE HAMPSHIRE

Check out the op-ed in today's Foster's by Republican State Rep Dave Hess on education funding.  Hess is part of the "leadership" of House Republicans, so you know his views reflect the views of the House Republican leadership.  The gist of the op-ed is that we, the Republicans, know how to spend your money more wisely than Governor Lynch.  Here's an excerpt.

"There is neither rhyme nor reason to [Lynch's] formula. In fact, the governor's plan spends the exact same amount, dollar for dollar, as the state would have spent under current law. The governor's current plan, which the Democratically controlled House of Representatives passed unchanged, just shuffles the money around, not unlike a shell game. The biggest difference is that 86 towns lose over $16 million under the governor's plan — towns that can ill afford to lose money, including four of the five original Claremont lawsuit towns."

There isn't a dime's worth of difference between Hess' plan and Lynch's.  Both agree that the quality of public education depends on how much we spend.  Both agree that we need to spend more.  And both agree that the "wise men" in Concord should decide how the money gets spent.  The only difference is they disagree over how best to spend our money.

Thus, the voters in this State just get to choose between two shades of blue.  A real Republican approach to public education would recognize that just increasing spending on public schools is not going to improve pubic education; competition is needed to do that.  It would be based on the premise that parents are much better decision-makers than the "wise men" in Concord.  To cut to the chase, the real Republican approach is school choice.

But how bad are things here?  Not only are the Republicans not advocating school choice.  They're not even for same but less.  They're just for the same. 

 


 

Meet the New Press today at 11

.
What a program we have in store for today! First of all, thanks to the efforts of the 'Grok/ MTNP resident technical wizard, genius, geek extraordinaire, and all around good guy, Skip Murphy, we have livestreaming ready to go this week! See the instructions  at the bottom of the post.
  • Freelance writer Jennifer Rubin. She is published in American Spectator, NRO and ABC.com, as well as Human Events, Weekly Standard, and National Review. We will discuss Rudy's years as a prosecutor, the Gonzales mess, and Ward Connerly's affirmative action plans for '08. This is her fourth appearance here on MTNP.
  • Tim Pawlenty is the Governor of MN.  He won reelection in 2006, one of the few Republicans in a Dem-leaning state to do so.  He is national co-chair for McCain.  He is in NH for the official office opening. He'll join us for a segment.
  • Civil Unions in NH!! The gang will discuss this at great length today. Joining the panel will be Judy Paris, who penned an excellent op-ed in this week's Union Leader and another, posted here on the 'Grok. What are they (Dems) doing to our state?
  • Ryan Bilodeau, chair of the URI College Republicans will give us a wrap on his group's successful defense of free speech. (story here) Believe it or not, the ACLU jumped in on his behalf. We'll ask him what that was like. (next week)
  • NH welfare softened/Sgambati vulnerable?
  • YOUR PHONE CALLS AT 603 527 1490
It all starts at 11 AM today on Newstalk 1490 WEMJ. If you're not in the Central NH broadcast area, follow the instructions below for livestreaming, or check it out later on the MTNP Podcast page.

Meet The New Press - Live Streaming

 

Meet The New Press - Live Streaming!

Yes, the MTNP crew has finally got it working the way we want it to.  During the show, 9am - 11pm on Saturdays - WEMJ 1490am, we will be streaming the entire show.  It will start JUST before the show, but only a couple of minutes before and will end pretty much at the end of the show (for now).  So if you want to join us:

                    Player choices:

                        WinAmp - Click  Here  
                        WinAmp or QuickTime - Click Here
                        Windows Media Player - Click  Here

Note: f there is a problem with Windows Media Player in listening to the stream and the "Click here" doesn't work (as we are still transitioning to a new server hosting company), follow the below instructions:

Open up Media Player, full mode, go to FILE, open URL, and paste in:

http://www.GraniteGrok.com:8000


That should work.  If not, email me:  Skip   GraniteGrok.com    (you know what goes inbetween Skip and GraniteGrok!)
 

We are excited that those of you who are Internet-centric will now be able to join us!  Remember, we are just a phone call away at 603-527-1490 if you have a question or a comment during the show.  All we ask is that you keep it on topic (or reference something we just finished talking about) and pithy.  Jerrod, our engineer, will take the call and let us know you are on the line.  We will take your call at the first logical break, so please hold on until we get to you! 

One other thing - while we have just doubled our capacity, please do not get upset if you cannot get a stream first time out.  We are "playing this by ear" as we wait to see how many folks wish to be part of the show by this method.  If you have problems during the show, email me at Skip   at the usual GraniteGrok.com (yeah, let's give the robo-spammers a hard time with that email address formatting - you know how to do it!). 

Hang 'Em High Ayotte?

Do tough-on-crime death penalty advocates have a new hero in state Attorney General Kelly Ayotte?  Perhaps.  Ayotte is seeking the death penalty against John A. Brooks for allegedly engineering a 2005 murder-for-hire scheme. New Hampshire Union Leader reporter Kathryn Marchocki points out in her story, "[t]his is the second time Ayotte has sought the death penalty since she became the state's top prosecutor, in July 2004."

I oppose the death penalty, but I recognize that I am in the extreme minority on this matter. With crime seemingly on the rise here in the Granite State, Ayotte is well positioned to cast herself as a genuine crime fighter if she were ever to seek higher state office (Note to Gov. Lynch: There's only one state office higher than Ayotte's present office). And given the impressive manner in which she represented the state against Planned Parenthood of Northern New England before the U.S. Supreme Court, we could be looking at a new rising star.

Draft Joe Kenney for Governor?

I was recently invited to join a Facebook group called “Draft Joe Kenney for Governor 2008.”  Joe Kenney, of course is New Hampshire’s District 3 State Senator from Carroll County.

While I am hardly prepared at this point to join the Draft Joe Kenney movement, I think the Granite State could do a whole lot worse than to elect as it’s next Governor a Republican who served in both the Gulf War and the Iraq War. 

I also note that “Draft Joe Kenney for Governor 2008” already has 38 Facebook members, which is a whole lot more than the Draft Patrick Hynes movement has. Heh.

Finally, and more important for our immediate purposes, I have started my own Facebook group called, simply enough, “New Hampshire Republicans.”  I hope to use it in conjunction with Granite Grok as a tool to capture some of the latent activism on the right here in the Granite State.  Please consider becoming a Facebook member and joining “New Hampshire Republicans.”

Sgambati Will be Vulnerable in 2008

District 4 state Senator Kathy Sgambati is a person of unquestionable competence.  Immediately upon winning election she was recognized in Concord as a valuable resource on matters relating to Health and Human Services, a state department she essentially ran for years.  And I believe the motives that guide her decision making in Concord are pure.

And that’s the problem.  Kathy Sgambati simply does not share the values of the voters of Belknap County.  She demonstrated as much this week when she, along with the rest of her Democratic colleagues, voted to redefine marriage in the Granite State … without ever having mentioned it on the campaign stump and without any real public input. Most disappointingly, Sen. Sgambati is apparently unwilling to come onto “Meet the New Press” on WEMJ 1490 AM to discuss her vote, which indicates a level of discomfort with even talking about this, the Democrats’ number one priority issue.

Sen. Sgambati is also the author of a measure to relax work requirements for welfare recipients.  She would, in effect, extend the length of time people could collect welfare payments, even though we have the most robust jobs market in the state’s history.

Only 733 votes separated Kathy Sgambati and Jim Fitzgerald in the 2006 Senate race.  We know that Jim lost primarily because of the high-level of state-at-home, non-voting Republicans that year. 2008 will be a presidential election year. Provided the Republicans nominate a reasonably competent presidential candidate, turnout in District 4 will likely be closer to what it was in 2004, the last presidential year.  That means roughly 9,264 people (though, perhaps more) who did not vote in 2006 will vote in 2008.  See my point?  If Republican State Chairman Fergus Cullen recruits a solid candidate who can clear the primary field, and together they begin hammering on Sen. Sgambati’s “values gap” early and often, her seat will be highly vulnerable to Republican takeover. 

Republicans are learning the painful way that elections have consequences.  Democrats will learn that voting records have consequences, too.

April 27, 2007

McCain Meets the Bloggers. Third blogger conference call.

McCain in Franklin, NH (GG file photo)
.
In the third blogger conference call with John McCain, I was once again impressed with his willingness to engage directly with members of the New Media. His answers on a full range of questions were all on the mark. I continue to be pleased with his solid commitment to victory in the war, along with his understanding of important geo-political matters. His list of current and probable trouble spots for the US coincides with mine: Iraq, Iran, "radical Islamic extremism", and, most recently, Putin and a new Russian empire.
.
Sen. McCain also stated, almost word for word, my belief that, contrary to what Mitt Romney said recently, we MUST get Osama bin Laden.
"Every effort must be made to get anybody that inflicts harm on the US. Osama still holds a degree of control and is the symbol of Al Qaida."
Exactly. By working to get Bin Laden, you will be identifying and eliminating the building blocks that make up the organization.
.
McCain would oppose civil unions if he lived in NH and is against anything that impinges or impacts the sanctity of marriage. On the energy issue, which has been of some concern to me, given his sudden global warming views, I was relieved to hear him state that, while continuing to seek clean alternatives to foreign energy dependence, he is
"not ready to impose government controls or have government intervene."
That is music to my ears. He is very pro nuclear energy. I agree. Wouldn't this free up more oil for gas in our cars, thus preventing price shocks? He is in favor of a "fair" tax or a "flat" tax, in answer to a question from Skip, pledging to promote
"any effort to reform the tax code that a majority of the people and Congress support,"
acknowledging the wasted time spent in tax compliance. He will try to fix the social security mess, noting that future generations
"will face bankruptcy or ruinous taxation if we don't fix it."
I will discuss 2 other points he raised in separate posts: judges, and homeland security "pork."
.
All in all, Senator McCain remains very high on the list of candidates acceptable to me as both nominee and president. The new world war trumps all other issues. McCain is rock solid on this, declaring,
"I would rather lose a campaign versus losing the war."
I am glad to see that he continues to be that strong voice of support so valuable to maintaining support for the war here on the homefront. Win or lose, he is doing the country a great service.
.
More blog con call reports here and here.

McCain - bloggers conference call

Doug and I were both pleased to be invited to Senator John McCain's

 

Pat is speaking.....part of the announcement
McCain

WIll try to be doing this every two weeks.

He is in Sioux City

Notes that bloggers would rather question than listen

He is happy with audiences, notes that healthcare is one of the top issues.....war in Iraq.
He enjoys the Town Hall venues the best

Jennifer Reuban - Romney - not worth capturing OBL.  Agree or disagree.
John - usually don't comment....this is national security...he has some operational and figurehead.  He agrees with Israelis ....follow to the end of the world  so he disagrees absolutely

Klien - war funding - when will the effects start to take effect. 
John - drop dead is early in June.  Problem is that they have to make plans...like MRAP - have to plan the factories and the committments....short, med, and long range plans.  We have to allow the tropops to do the max that they can do.  Any day that the troops don't know is not good.  If he was Pres, he'd veto it and play up the port money and the sponsors.  It is obscene and corrupt

Ryan Sager - romney and guil.  agaistnt civil union.  His stance?  He is opposed to the it...but it is up to the States.  He believes that agreements are fine...but is against anything that is aginst the sanctimony of marriagne

Soren dayton - Michael ware who heckled you....is there a shift i n the press in how it is being reported and is he seeing a change. 
J - Suicide bombers are still focus , there is progress in baghdad...dayala province is getting the isnurgencies.  He is hearing rumors thaty Maliki govt wants to take 2 months off.  They have to work on security and oil sharing.  Patreus is concerned about bombers and quipment from Syria and Iran.  measured and small progress is being made, but Maliki govt has to step up to the plate....

Mike Goldfarb - deadline to the Sec Air Force on CSAR has passed - did you get a resonse? 
J hasn't been in the office will send an email

Patrick Bell - Saudi's disrupted an attack.....how hi a priority is hybrid / plug ins and where do you stand.
j - his speech prev day of VT....saudis already stopped an attack on a oil.  He would not subsidize ethanol, but get it from lots of places.  Need nuclear badly....streamline the process and fix the reporccessing / storage of waste.  Hybrid - electric could be important as most cars < 25 mi /day.  Govetn should not intervene.  What happens in the middle east is important to us.

Lori Bird - Pres Bush shortcoming - communications.  "Lighten up and get a life".  Have you seen the change from the press in how they treat you? 
J - Bush need to provide better updates and more often.  Politicians blame peress / bloggers.....he takes his own blame...if he cannot manage the press now, he shouldn't be pres.  He will continue to be him, maintain sense of humor....shouldn't blame media

Doug - issue of prok - you'd do a veto.  Gilford  wash and excercise - upset that under Homeland.  How can they get it - all over it.   How would you manage it?
J - laden with pork, states does not target hi priority areas.  Pork breeds corruption.  Te process is broken by putting lots of stuff into bills that should not have them. 

Ann Althouse - who would you appoint to Supreme?  Put a conserv or work with liberals with moders
J - no litmus tests.wants strict interpretations.  He feels founding fathers should not legistlate but decide.  He wants people with judicial experience AND other life experiences other than lwyer and judge - like military, small business, corportion. = knowledge of the real world.  Strict is the most improtant.

John Hinderacker - strong language on SS and Medicare
J - supported Bush.  It is going broke.  Reach out to Dems...and the folks to tell them to reach back. It has to be bipartisan, a quick commission study

Jim Gauraty - WaPo editorial Broder - Mc is the Anti Bush
j


Pat Curley - inside baseball question - electoral map.....those states that were blue - are thre any you can change to red?
j - CA.  Oregan, WA, PA, NY  cannot write off states automatically even considering money. 

Robert Bluey - Defense - Mitt.  Speanding wants 4% of GDP. 
J - what we do vs how much is more important.  Increased spending is vital - like missle defence.  Are we buying the right stuff to fight radical Islamofacists and spending on stuff we don't.  Have to cap spending.  Get the smartest like Fred Smith, those that have made billions, and put them in DoD and make it work right.  Heads of services need to be involved more in acuisitions.

I asked Fair Tax
Supprotive of redoing the tax code.  very complicated has to be revised.  Had dinner with head of Estonia (grew up in Brooklyn), they can dial up, flick and get it donw with 98.8% compliance.

Kinda equivocated in that he was not quite ready to sing onto anything specific just yet. but it does need to be studied and fixed.

He hesited



 

 

Romney - oh really?

Just saw this entry by Byron York over at the Corner:

A story in the Associated Press characterizes Mitt Romney's statements in a recent interview this way:

[Romney] said the country would be safer by only "a small percentage" and would see "a very insignificant increase in safety" if al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was caught because another terrorist would rise to power. "It's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person," Romney said. Instead, he said he supports a broader strategy to defeat the Islamic jihad movement.
I haven't seen the full text of the interview, so perhaps there is some missing context.  But if the quote is correct, just speaking as one taxpayer, I would say a) we have already spent billions and gone to a lot of effort to try to get bin Laden, and b) it would be worth still more money and still more effort to kill the man behind 9/11.  I can't imagine any serious Republican candidate for president would say otherwise.  Perhaps Romney should watch the tape of the planes hitting the towers again.

My Take On Things:  we (average Joe Sixpack) really don't know if OBL is still actively running things or not.  Is he merely a figurehead, or not?

As far as I am concerned, I disagree with Dems - the fight against Islamofascists is NOT just limited to Afghanistan.  Their claim that Iraq (effectively) is a mere distraction is wrong - ANYWHERE Islamofascists are located is where the "war" is located.  And we have to kill them - they will not discuss (unless they see it in their interests), they will not settle for a truce (unless they see it in their interests), and they will not stop (unless they see it in their interests) or until we have all converted or die or submit to Shar'ia law as Dhimmis (after all, Islam means submission).

Or we get them first. 

We go to long lengths in this country for justice.  Yes, we have flaws, and yes, mistakes (sometimes grevious ones) are made.  But that is the bedrock of our society - the rule of law.  And one of those tenets is that those who are suspects must face justice, and let our system decide innocence or not.

That is the way it should be.

But ya gotta have the perp to do it!  And OBL has admitted to launching and blessing the attack - for all those 3,000 people who died, and their families, the rule of law must be fulfilled.  Justice must be served.

Romney may be technically correct (think Law of Diminishing Returns), but not in the grander sense of Justice completed.  The trail to OBL goes through all kinds of other, lower level Islamists.  To capture OBL, lots of others will, most likely, be rounded up or killed - their terror cells as well. 

Getting OBL gets the others. Give me someone who is relentless in this cause.  Get them all!

Sorry, but Romney's statement doesn't make it for me. 

 

 

 

RedState in Iraq

Two RedState bloggers are presently in Iraq.  They are filing their posts regularly.You should go there are read up …

Morality, NH style...

.
Our friend Judy Paris forwards the following in response to this letter appearing in the April 26th Concord Monitor. Yes, the battle over state sanctioned same-sex "unions" rages on...

In Response to Not a Religious Issue, Monitor, April 26

.
I’d also like to add that Ms. Potter’s views are nothing more than her opinion just like my views are my opinion. Let’s face it; most of us would rather be “right” than get along.
The definition I find of “bullying” in the dictionary differs; i.e., “a person who hurts, frightens, threatens, or tyrannizes over those who are smaller or weaker.” I don’t know how Ms. Potter knows the condition of my heart (nor anyone else’s) as far as my motives, so it could be she’s being a bit presumptuous in her statements that some of us are out to “hurt” homosexuals or that they are smaller or weaker.
.
If you look up the word respect it states: “deserve our admiration” and diversity means “difference.” We could argue all day from both points of view as to whether homosexuals (or anybody else for that matter) “deserve” admiration. There would be adamant opinions on both sides.
While she’s “wary of those who use religion in their ‘defense’ (justification or support) of discrimination” (to “distinguish or observe the difference between”), and I’m wary of her quoting scriptures out of context to support her position that some Christians’ quote scriptures to “justify their intolerance.” First of all, she’s taken all of her scripture quotes out of the entire context of the Bible (e.g., see my reference in the “Union Leader” regarding children) and at best doesn’t understand the difference between Old Testament (simplistically put, some scriptures are a historical reference) and New Testament scripture, etc. At worst, she’s manipulating and misusing scripture to support her position and place blame merely because everyone doesn’t agree with her. She is obviously not a biblical scholar (nor do I profess to be) or theologian and should perhaps stick to her 30-years of experience in secular teaching and leave something she does not have much knowledge about to others who do.
.
Also, the definition of intolerance could more easily apply to her; i.e., “lack of tolerance, especially in matters of religion.”
.
In truth, just because she thinks the civil union bill is not a moral issue does not mean that everyone else agrees with her. Many people believe it has a lot to do with morality. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, and perhaps we all need to stop confusing our opinions with being absolutely right or wrong.
.
I do agree with her that it’s about granting equal legal protections and responsibilities but since it only applies to same-sex couples and not to any two-people living together, it is giving preference to a small percentage of NH’s population and therefore discriminates against all other two-people living together other than married couples. So homosexual’s who profess about being discriminated against will now be ok being discriminators against many others because they now have what they want?
.
Yes, there will likely be a “backlash from citizens” especially during the next election depending on who voted for or against the civil union bill and other legislation that has taken the focus off of what’s more important to many NH citizens.
.
I don’t think anybody’s changing anybody’s mind on the issue because all of us have to be willing and open to changing our mind on this or any other issue. It seems like most of us have made up our minds as to where we stand, many of whom haven’t done an ounce of their own research on this or much of anything else.
.
Let’s move on to the “realistic” people (some of whom believe everything they read or hear in the left-wing media but have never done any of their own research) who hate President Bush (some just because it’s the “popular” thing to do and those outstanding Hollywood role models say so too!) more than the President of Iran (who supports terrorists and wants to kill Americans) for a more perplexing debate!
.
Oh yeah, don’t forget to use only one square of toilet paper because Sheryl Crow says so and the “alarmists” have moved onto Global Warming as their new God of self from last year’s crises…hmmm, sorry I forget what it was. Am I a “victim” or is it that people with no rudder just seem to move too fast from one thing to the next and are too accepting of what they’re told partly because of who tells it to them? I’ll have to do my research and get back to you.
.
Can I hitch a ride on your jet Mr. Gore so I can save on my gas and do my part to save on those dreaded carbon emissions? It’s keeping me awake at night with worry.
.
It’s a very scary world in la, la land out there.

April 26, 2007

Homeland Security?

Do you remember the ATVs, pickup trucks, plasma TVs, etcetera that have made news as being somehow deserving of so-called "homeland security" monies, via the federal government? Did you think (hope) those days were over? Check out what's happening in my hometown of Gilford, NH. Click here to visit GraniteGrok's local blog for the story. Unbelievable.

It Is Finished

According to the Associated Press (sorry no link yet) the New Hampshire Senate just passed the civil unions legislation and have now shuffled it off to Gov. Lynch.  All 14 Democrats in the State Senate voted for it.  All ten Republicans voted against it.  As I said, I have been unable to secure even a single Democrat to appear on “Meet the New Press” this Saturday to discuss the subject.  Oh well, we're certainly going to talk about it anyway. I will spend the next couple of days analyzing which Democratic Senators this shortsighted blunder will hurt the most.  But right off the bat, I think Kathy Sgambati in District 4, as bright and as well-respected as she is, has done herself serious political harm.

TELLING IT LIKE IT IS (NOT)

Today's Concord Monitor's editorial is about same-sex marriage --oops, I mean civil unions.  Pravda-on-the-Merrimack dutifully repeats the Left's "talking point," which is that the law is about ending discrimination and creating "equal rights for all."   

So a law that discriminates against opposite sex couples who want to enter into civil unions is a law that treats everyone equally? 

Well, actually, yes. The so-called civil union law is not really about establishing civil unions, but about establishing same-sex marriage.  The Monitor just can't tell it like it is, because Governor Empty-Suit said he was against same-sex marriage. 

 

Democrats: ā€œFixingā€ the Granite State

“This is the number one issue for us as we move forward.”

.
NH Democratic Party Chair Ray Buckley
.

Those were the words of NH party chair Ray Buckley at the April 14th meeting of the Belknap County Democrats. What was he referring to? Property taxes? The state budget? Perhaps something to do with the environment? Was he talking about protecting children against predators? How about improving education in general? No, we could only wish that one of these matters was what Chairman Buckley was speaking about at the crowded meeting featuring presidential aspirant Joe Biden. No, what Buckley was referring to, accompanied by thunderous cheers from the attendees, was civil unions.

.
That’s right—the newly-minted leader of the majority party here in the Granite State has declared this to be the burning issue of our time. Even though I was at a meeting of Democrats and knew that I would hear much that I would disagree with, watching those gathered so loudly and excitedly cheering and applauding for this new special right for same-sex couples was disconcerting.
.
Following the chairman’s pep-talk rallying the forces in favor of state-sanctioned homosexual relationships, state representative Gail Morrison produced a petition for all to sign urging Gov. Lynch to support the measure. I thought someone was going to get hurt in the ensuing stampede of those wanting to sign. My wife and I, in attendance to hear Sen. Biden, were incredulous at the spectacle. While we knew that Democrats were favorable to this matter, we had no idea of the extent and depth of the support.
.
Is this what voters bargained for when they chose Democrats to run our state? Do Joe and Jane Sixpack really believe that New Hampshire should be one of a small handful of states that officially recognizes gay relationships? Do you agree that it is the single, most important issue facing the state as we move forward? When voting back in November, were you thinking that we just have to fix this unfair situation in which men can’t marry their boyfriends or girls can’t legalize their relationship with their same-gendered “partner”? Me neither. Yet, here we are.
While “civil unions” has been the top priority for the Democrats and their adherents, unfortunately they have saved some enthusiasm for other causes as well. After all, when setting out to destroy a state and society as we know it, one needs to engage in a multi-fronted assault. Consider our esteemed state senator Kathleen Sgambati. In addition to enthusiastically supporting civil unions, she has raised another matter that undoubtedly you, like me, didn’t know needed “fixing”: welfare.
.
An innocuous article appearing inside the April 16th Daily Sun told the story.
“Senate Democrats voted as a unit last week to make it easier for single parents, most of them women, to keep drawing state welfare checks. Senate bill 226, co-sponsored by Senator Kathy Sgambati (D-Tilton) passed in a 14-10 party line roll call and moves to the house.”
As the Nation continues to tighten up its welfare rules, NH goes in the opposite direction. Who called on our senator to promote this legislation? Oh, that’s right—she’s a Democrat. This is what they do- take money from me and you, and give it to someone who “needs” it more.
.
My state Senator, Kathy Sgambati
.
Again from the article in the Daily Sun:
“The legislation gives bureaucrats more leeway to meet some high federal standards imposed last year. It also buffers the toughest features of the new welfare reform rules at the state and federal levels to wean people from the public dole and make them support themselves.”
Heavens no, we couldn't have that, now could we? Why teach people to fish when we can take somebody else’s fish and simply give it to them?
.
Add to civil unions and welfare “reform” the criminalization of helium-balloon releases, mandatory seat belts, and a symbolic vote to immediately withdraw from the Iraqi front in the new world war against Islamo-fascism and what do we have? A state that is radically different than what it was less than six months ago. Let’s not forget the removal of parental rights to be notified of a minor daughter’s murder of their grandchild in the womb, either.
.
Following civil unions will be gay adoption. Again here’s our state senator Kathy Sgambati on the topic, as reported in an April 14th Daily Sun article about a recent trip by members of the Laconia High School Gay/Straight Alliance to the state capitol. In a visit with the senator, she
“assured the group that she supported civil unions as well as legislation that protects the rights of gays and lesbians to adopt children and serve as foster parents. Her years of experience at the NH Department of Health and Human Services, she recalled, which included supporting the well-being of families and children, had introduced her to many gays and lesbians who had proved to be outstanding parents. ‘And there are many heterosexuals who are not good parents,’ she said, noting that sexual orientation has nothing to do with parenting skills.’”

.
Surely this is not your grandfather’s Democratic Party. I firmly believe that if more regular folks, especially those who voted Democrat because they were mad at the Republicans, knew what was actually going on at the ground level of that party and thought about the fundamental changes taking place in the Granite State as a result, would have voted differently. Unfortunately, the GOP gave little reason for voters to choose them. So far, I don’t see much changing in that regard.

No Dems Want to Defend Civil Unions?

I have invited Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley, House Speaker Terri Norelli, and State Senator Kathy Sgambati to appear on "Meet the New Press" on WEMJ 1490 AM this Saturday morning to talk about civil unions in New Hampshire. Anyone who listens to five minutes of our show can tell you that we are not "shout radio" and guests are treated with respect.

Sadly none of these has responded to my request to appear on the program.  I am growing concerned that our friends on the other side of the aisle wish they could change New Hampshire's marriage laws without the resultant discussion and backlash.

More here.

April 25, 2007

MSM - no bias?

A loyal read (H/T: Russell) brought the following emails to my attention concerning how NBC views itself regarding the reporting of the Virginia Tech massacre.  Now, I have not intentions of posting ANY pictures as I have come to the conclusion that I do not wish to give this evil person any more publicity than NBC already gave him when they published his materials.

Sick puppies, all.  Russell agreed in his email to me

This is the story that set me off... 'fraid I took brisk exception to this MSM crackberry and his spinnage. Aside from the obvious attempt to demonize hunters, I think it's contemptible that NBC enabled this lunatic bring more pain to folks after his death. It's wrong.

Anyways, one of the pictures show him wearing a vest.  Here is how Robert Windrem, an investigative producer at NBC News wrote about the story here (bold emphasis mine):

There also appears to be a change of personality between the first clips and those marked as “end.”  Cho is angrier, his language cruder and his speech more rambling. In many of the others, he mumbles and is apologetic about what he is about to do. And in at least two, he talks about what he has done “today.” He is dressed differently as well. In the earlier videos, he is dressed in a black T-shirt, sometimes wearing a hood. In the later ones, he is seen wearing his ammunition-laden vest, with a baseball cap, as if dressed for hunting.

Disclaimer: I am not hunter, nor have I ever hunted.  However, both my stepdad and my father-in-law did.  I know what a hunter, if s/he is safety conscious, will wear and bring.  Our Now, I saw the photo, I would never, ever, have thought this personification of evil was going hunting in the traditional manner.

Anyways, what is important was that this also caught Russell's eye and emailed Mr. Windrem (emphasis mine):


From: <redacted>
To: Windrem, Robert (NBC Universal)
CC: <redacted>
Sent: Thu Apr 19 2007
Subject: "As if dressed for hunting...?"

Your 4/19/07 update article re: VTI killer leads into its concluding paragraph with the sentence "In the later ones, he is seen wearing his ammunition-laden vest, with a baseball cap, as if dressed for hunting."

That vest, and other very similar designs, is also used by Time magazine photographers, NBC videographers, NPR sound engineers, birdwatchers etc - and that type would not be commonly worn by a hunter - it is not blaze orange, or camo, and so not a good choice for hunters.  Your attempt to associate this psycho with hunting did not and is not going to go un-noticed.

You are either uninformed, did not research, or just took a cheap shot - not smart - pretty transparent in fact.  Your agenda is showing.

I believe that the call-out was justified.  Hunters, because of the gun issue and the "Bambi" issue, in my eyes, are denigrated by the Left all the time.  However, I'm not going to go off on a rant - not tonite.

However, the response to the email was quite illustrative (emphasis mine): 

From: Windrem, Robert (NBC Universal)
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007
To: <redacted>
Subject: Re: "As if dressed for hunting...?"

So is yours

Robert Windrem
NBC Nightly News
I have removed Mr. Windrem's email address and his phone numbers...if you really wish to contact him, it should be easy enough.
To me, it continues to show a bias....at one level, it tries to tie evil to hunters...after all, guns are guns, right?  They all can kill people, right?  Therefore, they are all bad.
Sure, let's get two targets with one stone (MSM thinking).
And they continue to wonder why the dead tree media outlets are losing profits and employees hand over fist, and the network share ratings are starting to follow suit.  They have not gotten the message that people want them to REPORT THE NEWS - straight up.  Leave the opinions on the Op Ed page, or at least make it clear.
Bloggers are not the end all be all.  However, we ARE subject matters in what we do for livings (or serious hobbies).  We also depend a lot on the MSM for actual news (and thus give us food for fodder).
But the vast majority of us tell our readers who we are and what our biases are. 

COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVE VALUES?

Today's Union Leader has an op-ed from former Congressman and N.H. Supreme Court Justice Chuck Douglas arguing that "voters will find the common sense conservative values they are looking for in John McCain."

The op-ed focuses on federal spending, which is understandable given that McCain is not that conservative on immigration, free speech or Congress' advice and consent power (I'm talking about the Gang of 14).  Ironically, Douglas' op-ed ran the same day as the U.S. Supreme Court heard another challenge to that exercise in censorship known as campaign finance reform.

Would McCain be far preferable to any Democrat running for Prez?  Of course.  But one is not going to get just "common sense conservative values" with McCain.

Hey Harry, remember this?

.
This is a letter from a retired military person (hero) and current member of the Pease Greeters group here in NH, written in response to Sen Harry Reid's "the war is lost" remark. He provides a good history lesson that, if not learned, we are doomed to repeat. We must NOT allow that to happen...
.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Said the Iraq War is “Lost”
We, the members of the Portsmouth N.H. Air Terminal Greeters, thank and honor all our forces as they go to or return from Iraq. When we speak to those who are doing the fighting, we never hear a trace of the pessimism as that expressed by Senator Harry Reid.
.
As a soldier with two tours of duty in Vietnam, I am disgusted that there are those in our governmental leadership that are attempting to repeat the disastrous mistakes of 1968. 
.
In January 1968 the Communist Forces launched their surprise Tet Offensive throughout Vietnam.  The American T V coverage of the offensive made the war seem hopeless, wasteful, and most likely lost.  Walter Cronkite, viewing the battle from Saigon declared the war, “un-winnable”.  Later our soldiers’ actions were characterized as, “immoral”.
.
Published memoirs, documents, and interviews made public by Hanoi, reveal an entirely different assessment of offensive. The elites in media and universities have access to all these documents.  However, they have ignored even their very existence. The fact that we came close to winning the war in1968 conflicted with their left wing mind set.  
.
The losses suffered by the Communist’s Forces in their Tet Offensive of 1968 were so devastating, that Hanoi was at the brink of suing for piece. Their only hope for victory lay in what they saw on American T V.  They could not win on the battle field. However, using their ideological friends in the U S they resolved to erode our political will on our city streets. This resulted in seven more years of war, 30,000 more U S deaths and defeat.
In 1973 we withdrew our few remaining forces. In 1974 congress stopped all aid to Cambodia and Vietnam. In 1975 the enemy won. The blood bath that followed consumed millions and enslavement of tens of millions, all made possible by our lovers of “peace”.
.
Now fast forward to 2007.  The “peace” advocates now look much different than they did in 1968. They have cut their hair, bathed, and dress in conservative clothing.  However, most have not lost their desire “to make a difference”.  Many have risen to positions of great prominence. Their values now control congress, over 90% of the mass media, the entertainment industry, and the social studies departments of all our universities. 
.
Lenin could not have wished for more. One of the “peace” protestors even went on to occupy the White House for eight years. Another almost became our 44th U S President, if the press had been able to keep his Swift Boat Comrades quiet. He said of our soldiers that they, “acted in a manner reminiscent of Genius Khan”. Hanoi must have loved him.
.
We must learn from 1968. Our foe is fanatical and capable of enormous destruction. They must be stopped now or generations of Americans will pay a terrible price for our failure.
.
James J. Reilley
LTC USA (RET)
.

What New Hampshire Did and Did Not Vote For

The extreme left in New Hampshire is united on issues like balloon fines, relaxed work-for-welfare requirements, civil unions, and revoking parental rights in cases of minors wanting to obtain an abortion (even though, by statute, those girls have been raped and we ought to crack down on the child molesters who impregnated them, but that’s the subject for another post, I suppose.) But when it comes to the singular issue in which the New Hampshire voters granted them a mandate to run the Granite State—a permanent fix regarding the school funding controversy—they don’t seem to be reading from the same, uh, textbook.

The NEA-NH is saying Nein! to Gov. John Lynch’s constitutional amendment relative to school funding, CACR 18, according to Tom Fahey.  And NEA-NH president Karen McDonough is going to deploy the organization’s 16,000 political operatives teachers to pressure legislators to kill it.  Not that it was ever likely to pass anyway.

And so again, not to be so redundant but this stuff needs to be drilled into the minds of voters, the Democrats promised us a progressive, permanent solution to the lingering school funding controversy.  Instead they are giving us a radical agenda they didn’t mention once in their 2006 campaign.  New Hampshire voters can never make this mistake again.

April 24, 2007

CONCORD MONITOR PILES ON

Pravda-on-the-Merrimack was late to join the liberal press's piling on regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on partial-birth abortion.  But Pravda-on-the Merrimack's contribution is particularly vapid, even for Pravda-on-the-Merrimack.

The op-ed begins, "

I
In the 1992 abortion case known as Casey, U.S. Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor and David Souter co-wrote an opinion that purported to clarify the law of the land. Eight years later, in a partial-birth abortion case known as Stenberg, those justices no longer agreed about what they had jointly ruled."

That is because Casey was a political, not a legal decision.  The case introduced the "undue burden" standard, which is a political, not a legal, judgment.  Unlike due process or equal protection there is no constitutional text or history or precedent to guide a judge deciding when a law regulating abortion is an "undue burden."  An "undue burden" is simply a matter of opinion, which made and makes cases like Stenberg inevitable.

The Monitor claims that "there is no supporting logic" for Justice Kennedy's opinion.  Try this:  "Under precedents that we assume to be controlling, the Act would be unconstitutional if it subjected women to significant health risks.  There is documented medical disagreement on this question.  In the face of this uncertainty and given the availability of other abortion procedures that are considered to be safe alternatives, the Court’s precedents instruct that the Act survives a facial attack."  In other words, the Court deferred to Congress' determination that the ban would not result in significant health risks for women.  How illogical!  After all, the judges' years of legal training and experience obviously makes them better suited to make medical judgments.   

 

GraniteGrok "Dope of the Week" Award: Sheryl Crow

sheryl crow obviously sitting with an itch
Sheryl Crow after exercising the "one square" rule,
sitting in obvious discomfort...
.
After stating that she has spent much time on her recent concert tour trying to come up with ways to slow global warming, singer Sheryl Crow believes she has found the answer:
"Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. "I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting."
After extensive and intense scientific testing, GraniteGrok has determined that Sheryl Crow's global warming initiative calling for only one square of toilet tissue per bathroom visit is inherently unworkable. The results were even more damning against Crowe's proposal after brussels sprouts were added to the prior evening's meal.
.
For her lack of in-depth anal ysis before issuing her findings, the juried judges here at the 'Grok proudly proclaim Ms. Crow, "Dope of the Week". She completely wiped out her competition. Even Rosie O'Donnell agrees...

Ah, Sweet Technology …

My friend Doug sees technology as the ultimate disinfectant against “funny business” in local government and elsewhere.  He’s been known to bring his shiny new digital camera around with him to various political events and public gatherings and subsequently post the video online.  Doug has never suspected corruption on the part of his or any other local government—he’s never expressed it to me that way, anyway—but he believes technology has the potential to spray sunshine into every corner of government, and that adds empirical value to the community. (I trust Doug will correct me if I am misrepresenting his point of view.)  I quite agree with Doug in this regard.

But sometimes technology can be used in ways that cast a shadow of darkness over the goings on of public bodies.  I must confess that I have not paid especially close attention to HB 377, the so-called Right-to-Know bill. At first blush, HB 377 seems unobjectionable enough; it would essentially classify e-mails sent to a majority of a government body as a public record.

But according to an editorial in today’s New Hampshire Union Leader:

But it is more than a technical update. It defines as a public meeting any quorum of a public body "whether in person, by means of telephone or electronic communication, or in any other manner such that all participating members are able to communicate with each other contemporaneously, for the purpose of discussing or acting upon a matter or matters over which the public body has supervision, control, jurisdiction, or advisory power."

This is a bad, very bad idea.  I have already expressed my irritation with the deceptive, almost stealth, manner in which our state legislators have gone about rewriting our state's marriage laws. Now this? Technology should make governance more public, not more private.

April 23, 2007

Concord's Priorities

Gunfire echoed through the mean streets of Manchester, NH last night, according to Scott Brooks of the New Hampshire Union Leader:

MANCHESTER – Residents in three city neighborhoods reported hearing bursts of gunfire in the middle of the night, police said yesterday.


 

Officers are investigating reported gunshots on five streets east of the Merrimack River, including three spots in the area around Gill Stadium. No injuries were reported, nor were police aware of any property damage, Sgt. Tom Gallagher said.


 

Police yesterday were trying to determine whether the shootings might have been related.


 

"It was pretty nerve-wracking. I was a little scared, obviously," said Sarah Gagnon, 25, who called police after hearing several gunshots just before 2 a.m. on

Beech Street.

 

Shell casings were found less than 100 yards from Gagnon's home.

Thank goodness our distinguished leaders in Concord have their priorities in order.

Welcome Pat!

Our friend Pat Hynes (AnkleBitingPundits) and co-owner with Doug and I of Meet The New Press radio show.  I met Pat a few months ago when we started MTNP and I have enjoyed his company and his friendship since.  He's an great read and a great guy on the radio too!

Anyways, he's decided to join the 'Grok crew for a while...and I am quite pleased and honored (gee, Big Dog comes to play with the little puppies!).  His first post is here and points out a problem for the PC folks:  it IS rather stupid to catagorize half of an entire state as being bigoted!  Yes folks, just because you disagree with us, you are bad, bad, bad.....but Pat uses bigger words than me.

Anyways, a bit about Pat:

 

 He likes this picture.....he looks so distinguished!

Patrick Hynes is the founder and proprietor of Ankle Biting Pundits, which was formerly known as Crush Kerry. Patrick lives in New Hampshire with his wife Michelle, daughters Rose and Grace.

A long time Republican operative and consultant, Patrick has helped hundreds of Republicans win public office. National Journal described Patrick as “a hack with a pretty good record of electing Republicans.” The American Conservative called Patrick, “an expert on evangelical voting patterns.” And Campaigns & Elections named Patrick a “Rising Star in American Politics.”

Patrick is the author of the book In Defense of the Religious Right (Nelson Current). [NOTE: GET IT, READ IT - ITS GOOD!  And yes, I still owe him a book review! -Skip]  He is a regular contributor to the American Spectator, Town Hall, TCS Daily, and others. Patrick also blogs at the Channel Changer.

Patrick is a regular guest on several talk radio shows, including Allman & Smash in the Morning in St. Louis. He has been a guest on Fox News Channel’s Hannity & Colmes, ABC World News Tonight, Good Morning America, CNN Talk Back Live, and even E!.

And to flog the obvious, he o-founded and co-owns Meet The New Press, a radio show by bloggers about what is going on in the blogosphere with a concentration on, what else, politics and current events. 

Perma-disclaimer: Patrick is a political and public relations consultant with Calypso Communications and New Media Strategics. At various times he may blog about a subject that is relevent to a client of either of those two companies. The reason for this is because he blogs about a lot of subjects, not because he blogs on behalf of these clients.

He can be reached at patjhynes-AT-msn.com

But I like this one better (even though my camera had the wrong date:

 


You Are a Bigoted Homophobe (UPDATED)

Almost exactly half (49%) of Granite Staters are “bigoted homophobes.”

That is according to the latest New Hampshire Poll by American Research Group and using the phraseology offered up by Steve McBrian in this Union Leader Op-Ed, which is still live on the UL’s website.  I notice that there are more “bigoted homophobes” than not, as only 42% of New Hampshire citizens favor civil unions.  9% have yet to decide if they are “bigoted homophobes” or not.

I would offer up some key pull quotes from Mr. McBrian’s ranting Op-Ed, but the thing needs to be read from beginning to end, so please do so now.  Suffice it to say, virtually everything in it is incorrect.  It is so over-the-top, I assumed it was a joke, at first.

Here is the biggest problem facing Mr. McBrian, Gov. Lynch, and all those Democrats in the State Senate who will vote to redefine marriage this week.  ARG writes:

While 72% of voters between the ages of 18 and 24 favor a law allowing civil unions in New Hampshire, 55% of those 25 to 44, 52% of those 45 to 64, and 53% of those 65 and older oppose a law allowing civil unions.

Having worked on a great many campaigns in my time, I can tell you with certainty that the 18-24 age demo doesn’t vote with very much intensity.  But the 45-64 age demo and the 65+ demo does.  This means that among those voters who vote reliably and consistently, majorities oppose the Democrats’ course of action on civil unions, which, by the way, is not what they were elected to act on.

The redefinition of marriage is but one consequence of electing extreme ideologues who operate under the guise of moderate good-government types.  Fortunately, the guise is being lifted and these people must stand for election every two years.

UPDATE: Pastor Greg Lull should expect some hate mail.

Free speech on campus? Not so fast...

.
In this previous post, I reported on a story from the University of Rhode Island concerning free speech on campus being replaced with "coerced" speech. After offering the "WHAM Scholarship (White Heterosexual American Male) during its "Coming Out Conservative Week", that campus' College Republicans group, chaired by Ryan Bilodeau, found itself in hot water. As punishment, the university's student senate ordered the College Republicans to write a letter of apology to be published in the school's newspaper. Taking a stand in defense of the freedom of speech, the URI College Republicans refused. Now, they find themselves "derecognized", in effect, banishing them from the campus. (One could imagine many liberals dreaming of ways to do this on a larger, more national scale)
.
The story is beginning to get some national attention, with the group F.I.R.E. (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) stepping in to help. The following press release was issued by that group last week. The chairman of the URI Republicans, Ryan Bilodeau, will join us on our radio program, Meet the New Press, this Saturday to give us the latest. You would think that of all places, the university setting would be the most welcoming of free speech. Think again...
.

University of Rhode Island Student Senate Dumps College Republicans, Defies University President’s Order to Follow First Amendment

PROVIDENCE, R.I.—Displaying a dramatic disregard for students’ constitutional rights, a committee of the University of Rhode Island (URI) Student Senate voted on Monday to derecognize the College Republicans student group. For months, the Student Senate has demanded that the group publicly apologize for advertising a satirical $100 “scholarship” for white, heterosexual, American males. The College Republicans refused to apologize and contacted the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) for help. FIRE is now calling upon URI President Robert Carothers, who has already informed the Senate that it could not compel student speech, to reverse the decision to derecognize the group.
.
“Neither the Student Senate nor anyone else at URI has the power to force the College Republicans to say things against their will,” FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. “As bad as it may be to tell people what they cannot say, it is still worse to tell them what they must say. The Supreme Court has long recognized that compelled speech is not compatible with free societies. It is stunning that URI’s student government would show such contempt for fundamental rights, especially after URI’s own president explained it to them.” 
.
The College Republicans student organization first advertised the satirical “White, Heterosexual, American Male” “scholarship” in November, 2006. The scholarship consisted of a nominal $100 to be awarded to someone fitting those criteria who submitted an application and an essay on the adversities he has faced. College Republicans President Ryan Bilodeau explained that the point was to use satire to protest scholarships awarded on the basis of race, gender, or nationality. Over 40 URI students applied for the “scholarship,” many submitting equally satirical application essays.
.
In a meeting on February 19, the Student Senate’s Student Organizations Advisory and Review Committee (SOARC) prohibited the College Republicans from disbursing the money. The group agreed that it would not give out the $100, but SOARC decided that even advertising the satirical “scholarship” violated URI’s anti-discrimination bylaws and demanded that the group publish an apology in the campus newspaper. Unwilling to apologize, Bilodeau appealed SOARC’s decision. The Senate denied that appeal.
.
FIRE wrote to Senate President Neil Cavanaugh on March 13, stating that because the Student Senate derives its authority from a public university, it must comply with the First Amendment prohibition on compelled speech. The Student Senate, however, in a memo to the College Republicans on March 27, ruled again that the College Republicans must publish an apology and claimed authority to force them to do so. That sanction was later reduced to an “explanation” to be published in the campus newspaper and a mandatory apology to be sent to all of the students who applied for the scholarship. 
.
The College Republicans agreed to publish an explanation of its intentions, but refused to write any apologies. FIRE wrote to URI President Robert Carothers the following day to urge him to intervene in the situation. FIRE wrote, “URI administrators have a legal duty to step in where the Student Senate has failed and to check its attempt to trample upon students’ most basic freedom of conscience.” And in a letter dated April 6, President Carothers did indeed instruct the Senate in no uncertain terms to drop its unconstitutional demand for an apology. Carothers wrote that the mandatory apology “does not meet constitutional standards as laid forth in the First Amendment and in subsequent court decisions interpreting the standard.”  
.
But at a meeting on Monday night, SOARC nonetheless unanimously voted to ignore both its constitutional obligations and Carothers’ directive and derecognize the College Republicans for refusing to issue an apology. SOARC’s decision will be voted on by the entire Student Senate on Wednesday, April 25. 
.
FIRE wrote another letter to Carothers yesterday [April 17] calling upon him to immediately reverse SOARC’s decision to derecognize the group. FIRE wrote that “[b]y fulfilling this responsibility as a public official, you can teach the Senate leadership that they must respect the rights of URI students and help to instill in them an understanding of the full repercussions for repeatedly and recklessly defying the Constitution.” 
.
“URI’s student government thinks it is above the law—that it can take fees extracted from students by a state university and yet ignore the constitutional obligations that come with them. It is sadly mistaken,” Lukianoff said. “President Carothers must act now to stop this rogue organization from conducting these unlawful acts under the aegis of the university.”
.
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation’s colleges and universities. FIRE’s efforts to preserve liberty universities across America can be viewed at www.thefire.org.
It really is a fascinating story. One wonders what kinds of students sit on the student senate that would so blatantly and openly defy their college's president and, more importantly, the basic tenets of free speech enshrined in the Constitution. One can only hope that such students don't move further on up the rungs of the ladder of politics after leaving college. It would be interesting to find out how many members of the student senate are, in fact, Democrats.
.
It has always amazed me that when it comes to the First Amendment, liberals find it sancrosanct in the protection of the right to pornography on library computers and Christian-bashing art, yet see no harm in turning it off when it comes to the real kinds of speech the founders intended to protect-- that which criticizes the "powers that be."
.
Click here to read a good letter on the subject defending the college Republicans in the URI student newspaper.

April 22, 2007

CONCORD MONITOR SAYS I'M A "TURNCOAT"

Today's "Capital Beat" calls me a "turncoat" for suggesting in this post that the Granite State has forfeited its claim on the first-in-the-nation primary for lurching so far and so fast to the left this year.  Some points about Pravda-on-the-Merrimack's reporting:

First, the Monitor never explained the basis for my position which is "it is not enough that the first-in-the-nation State be small enough to allow unknown and lesser funded candidates a realistic chance at breaking through.  The first-in-the-nation State must also represent the nation’s ideals and values.  Sadly, New Hampshire no longer does."

Second, the Monitor makes it sound like I think that New Hampshire has forfeited the claim to go first because I oppose civil unions and back Bush's Iraq policy,  This mischaracterizes my post, which said "  On defining issue after issue, New Hampshire has tacked way too far to the left.  A majority of American’s believe that parents have an inalienable right to know if their minor daughters are having an abortion.  Not in New Hampshire.  Here, parents’ rights are not as important as abortion rights.  A majority of Americans believe that marriage should remain the union of one man and one woman.  Not in New Hampshire.  Just today the Governor announced that he will sign into law a bill that, while titled civil unions, actually establishes same-sex marriage because it excludes opposite-sex couples.  And while a majority of Americans have serious misgivings about the prosecution of the war in Iraq, New Hampshire attitudes are out there with the moveon.org crowd, judging from a resolution recently passed by the House calling for an immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq." 

So my post was directed to the passage of a law against parental notification (which the Monitor never mentioned), the same-sex marriage bill passed by the House (sorry Monitor, but its same-sex marriage not civil unions) and the resolution calling for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq (which goes well beyond opposing Bush's Iraq war policy).  Incidentally, the Monitor has no idea where I stand on civil unions or Bush's Iraq war policy because they never called to ask.

Sorry, Monitor, but being a "turncoat" would mean reflexively supporting New Hampshire having the first-in-the-nation primary no matter how bad that would be for the nation as a whole.

I must thank the Monitor, however, for bringing to light another reason that New Hampshire shouldn't be first, which I omitted from my original post:  SOME OF THE PRESS COVERAGE IS REALLY, REALLY BAD.

UNION LEADER HOMOPHOBIC

Today's Union Leader's lead editorial takes Governor Empty Suit to task for flip-flopping on same-sex marriage.  Among other things, it states, "The questions about Lynch's action are numerous. The most basic is why he and his backers suddenly feel the need to grant this state sanction, one reserved for much of civilization to the union of men and women, to a small group whose sexual practices, whatever their cause or origin, are abhorrent and repugnant to a large segment of the population."

Does calling homosexual sex "abhorrent and repugnant" make the Union Leader homophobic?  Of course it does because "homophobia" has come to mean anything less than gushing enthusiasm for homosexuality.

Of course, if calling homosexual sex "abhorrent and repugnant" is "homophobic," then the "I believe that what two people do in the privacy of their home is nobody's business," the "I believe it is an issue of equal rights" and the "it's not government's business to say who may or may not marry" arguments do not suffice to prove that one is not homophobic.  One can believe all of these things and still find homosexual sex "abhorrent and repugnant."

So anybody who calls the Union Leader "homophobic" should in the interest of consistency ask Governor Empty-Suit whether he finds homosexual sex "abhorrent and repugnant."

Fight For Me...

Watch this music video honoring the US military by Citizen Reign. Then let Harry Reid and the rest of the loser-mongers tell us we cannot win. We HAVE to win...
.
.
. . . .

Life is what happens between the plans....

We often take the day to day items of our lives for granted - we bumble from one thing to the next.  Most of the time, bumbling is fine....better than stumbling and doing a face plant, right?  The majority of us try our best to do our best (most of the time anyways) and attempt to "do the right thing". We take the good things in stride, believing that they are the norm...after all, life is good, right?  The little pebbles in our shoes?  Yeah, we all complain.  After all, there is that saying that states that people will find a way to get around, over, or under the big obstacles in life - we just sigh, shoulder the burden, and create solutions.  Small pebbles in the shoe of life?  A whole 'nother story - these we bitterly complain, honk, and mutter about them more often than the big things going wrong in life.

We lack (or lose) perspective and context in our busy lives.  And sometimes, events happen that jiggle everything back into a proper perspective - sweeping the pebbles aside and exposing the more important boulders in life for what they really are and how we should really prioritize the little from the big, from the silly to the important, from the important to the truly urgent.

Sometimes life does not go well...and sometimes not well at all.  The tragedy at Virginia Tech shows us that life is not fair, that bad things happen to good people.  We are so fortunate in our country that most of our lives are "good" - we pass from day to day almost without a care until such an event happens like this or 9/11.  These types of events shows us, too, that true Evil lurks in the world - and acts on whatever impulse it does and uses people to accomplish its goals.  Evil is real regardless of whether our philosophers or culture admits to that notion.  And when Evil strikes, it is them that have not the words or understanding that can speak to those events because they deny its existence.

And sometimes, "stuff just happens" to simple individuals too.  No, not just because of Evil, but just because stuff happens.  A good example is Captain Ed and the First Mate over at Captain's Quarters with the First Mate's trials and tribulations with her health - pray for them! And we all have experienced these kinds of problems, even here at the 'Grok - our relatives and friends are certainly not immune to "stuff" happening.

You know, I do feel sorry for folks that deny God's existence (just as they deny the existence of evil) .  I certainly disagree with that outlook, for I know that when things go wrong, there is a comfort in knowing that God is in control.  No, you haven't lost your way here on the 'Grok - while politics is high on the scale of things, we do acknowledge that there is a Higher Power in control of our lives and that He is concerned with all of us individually.  And when things go wrong, He is our Rock and our Refuge and that He listens to our prayers (and yes, sometimes we don't receive the answers for which we hope).

No, life is not fair - and we should never expect it to be such (otherwise, you are in for a world of hurt when things do go south).  We should, instead, rejoice and give thanks for when life does work according to our quaint notions of fairness. 

And give thanks to God in all things, big and small, good or not, for there is always a purpose in everything (note: yup - I've learned the hard way over the years that He just might not have clued me in on things yet - nor should I ever expect that He should). 

 

Dems fixing NH retirement system. Not.

.
What does New Hampshire want?
A life line for the $6 billion shortfall in pension accounts.
What did the New Hampshire House deliver?
More life jacket regulations.
More information at: NHelection.info
.

April 21, 2007

Letter to a loser (Sen. Reid)

.
The following letter was written by Lt. Jason Nichols, a Naval officer who is currently serving in Baghdad. He is also the head of Appeal for Courage, a group of American active duty and reserve service personnel who are appealing to Congress to stay and finish the war. He writes to Democratic Senator Reid, who has declared the war "lost"...
Senator Reid:
.
When you say we've lost in Iraq, I don't think you understand the effect of your words. The Iraqis I speak with are the good guys here, fighting to build a stable government. They hear what you say, but they don't understand it. They don't know about the political game, they don't know about a Presidential veto, and they don't know about party politics.
.
But they do know that if they help us, they are noticed by terrorists and extremists. They decide to help us if they think we can protect them from those terrorists. They tell us where caches of weapons are hidden. They call and report small groups of men who are strangers to the neighborhood, men that look the same to us, but are obvious to them as a foreign suicide cell.
.
To be brief, your words are killing us. Your statements make the Iraqis afraid to help us for fear we'll leave them unprotected in the future. They don't report a cache, and its weapons blow up my friends in a convoy. They don't report a foreign fighter, and that fighter sends a mortar onto my base. Your statements are noticed, and they have an effect.
.
Finally, you are mistaken when you say we are losing. We are winning, I see it every day. However, we will win with fewer casualties if you help us. Will you?
.
Respectfully,
.
LT Jason Nichols, USN
MNF-I, Baghdad

Meet the New Press hits the air at 11AM...

.
Once again, we have a busy show put together for today. Among the topics we will discuss will be:
It all starts at 11 AM Saturday April 21st on Newstalk 1490 WEMJ. If you're not in the Central NH broadcast area, check it out later on the MTNP Podcast page. Starting next week, if all goes well, you'll be able to listen anywhere you have a computer and an Internet connection.

Less Work. More Money!

Again I ask, "Why?" Who wanted this? Was there a mass-mailed flyer I missed? A TV ad? I did not know that MY state senator ran a campaign that included making welfare easier to get and keep getting here in NH. Chris Dornin, writing for Golden Dome News in the Laconia Daily Sun (unavailable online) has the story:
CONCORD — Senate Democrats voted as a unit last week to make it easier for single parents, most of them women, to keep drawing state welfare checks. Senate bill 226, co-sponsored by Senator Kathy Sgambati (D-Tilton) passed in a 14-10 party line roll call and moves to the house.
As the Nation toughens its welfare rules, NH goes in the opposite direction. Who in these parts called on our esteemed senator to promote this legislation? Oh, that's right-- she's a Democrat. This is what they do! Take money from me and you, and give it to someone who "needs" it more than we do.
.
NH Senate Dist 4 Senator Kathy Sgambati. (granitegrok photo)
.
Here is a description of some of what the bill achives. Again from the April 16th article in the Daily Sun:
The legislation gives bureaucrats more leeway to meet some high federal standards imposed last year. It also buffers the toughest features of the new welfare reform rules at the state and federal levels to wean people from the public dole and make them support themselves."
No, we couldn't have that, now could we. Why teach people to fish when we can take somebody else's fish and simply give it to them... More here. Thanks, Senator... for nuthin'.

April 20, 2007

Like a moth drawn to light...

.
With each passing day, I feel myself drawn, like a moth to light, to the campaign for the Republican nomination being waged by John McCain. And, like the moth, I wonder, will I get burned if I venture too close? After all, for many years, every few months, the "maverick" Senator McCain would do something to tick me off. "Support the president, dammit," I would think. "Screw the terrorists," I would say. "Torture 'em till they talk, or die." And there was McCain-- standing in the way. The "gang of 14"; McCain Feingold. Kennedy-McCain. This list goes on... And yet, here I am, teetering on the brink. Doug Lambert-- a McCainiac? What?!
.
John McCain in Franklin, NH town hall meeting.
.
"But Doug, how could you? McCain?" Calm down- I'm not signed on with anybody yet. However, as I noted above, I find myself being drawn towards his camp. Why? It's simple: the war.
.
As I have repeated over and over again-- the number one issue for me is the war. I recognize that it is a new world war for survival against the tide of Islamic fascism. If we lose, we die. It's that simple. All other issues pale against this one. If we lose the war, McCain Feingold won't matter. Neither will global warming, or a whole host of other issues. A loss of the war renders everything moot-- except the Koran.
.
It is a proven historical fact that when democratic peoples go to war, they lose when the popular support collapses. It thus goes without saying that it takes leaders to nurture and sustain such support. It is a lack of vocal, determined leadership in the current phase of the war that has led us to the precipice of failure. Enter John McCain. Despite the chance he could lose a fair amount of independent and possible Democratic support in his bid for the GOP nomination, he has staked his entire campaign, and using the soapbox it provides, on seeing the war through to victory. In my mind, whether he ultimately wins or loses his bid, he is providing an immeasurable service to the Nation.
.
This, coupled with the fact that because of his occasional distance and dissention, he is seen as NOT being in President Bush's back pocket, he might actually be one of only a few chances we have to keep a Democrat out of the Whitehouse in '08. Am I upset that he sang "Bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran"? Are you kidding me? As someone who has long believed that Iran IS the fountainhead of Islamo-fascism, the "head of the snake," if you will, this is welcome music to my ears. I am glad that at least one of our national leaders recognizes that problem. It doesn't hurt that MoveOn.org is so against McCain these days either. That a group that represents, in my opinion, the "enemy within", is so opposed to John McCain, speaks volumes.
.
I feel myself getting closer... will I get burned? We'll have to wait and see.  
.

Horror in NH: Moonbats in the Majority- the movie.

Be afraid New Hampshire. Be very afraid! They've only just begun. Click the arrow to watch the latest 'Grok VLog...
. .
Surely this is not your grandfather's New Hampshire. I firmly believe that if more regular folks-- those who voted Democrat becaused they were mad at the Republicans-- knew what was actually going on at the ground level of that party, and thought about the fundamental changes taking place in the Granite State as a result, would have voted differently. Unfortunately, the GOP gave little reason for voters to choose them. So far, I don't see much changing in that regard. [UPDATE]: Our friend Pat Hynes at AnkleBitingPundits.com has an interesting analysis on the state of our state and the opportunities the GOP might have to undo the destruction wrought by the Dems. I hope he's right. Click here.

More Jettiness - the HyFish

 Well, I said that blogging was going to be light - and I was right!  Between working on the live streaming test for Meet The New Press radio show, other obligations, and tax time, blogging time has been light.  And this post is "light" compared to the posts that Doug and Ed have been churning out in my absence. 

So why this?  Well, why not?  It's COOL looking! And it is a hydrogen powered jet to boot - zero emission hydrogen fuel cell jet!

And did I mention that it looks cool? 

 

For more info, here's the link to the site.  What is also cool is that this is not just a rendition - it actually flies!

 

 

April 19, 2007

NEW HAMPSHIRE SHOULD NO LONGER BE FIRST

Hosting the first-in-the-nation primary is a privilege and an awesome responsibility.  The State holding the first-in-the-nation primary exerts tremendous influence over the nation’s choice for President.  This means that it is not enough that the first-in-the-nation State be small enough to allow unknown and lesser funded candidates a realistic chance at breaking through.  The first-in-the-nation State must also represent the nation’s ideals and values.  Sadly, New Hampshire no longer does.  

On defining issue after issue, New Hampshire has tacked way too far to the left.  A majority of American’s believe that parents have an inalienable right to know if their minor daughters are having an abortion.  Not in New Hampshire.  Here, parents’ rights are not as important as abortion rights.  A majority of Americans believe that marriage should remain the union of one man and one woman.  Not in New Hampshire.  Just today the Governor announced that he will sign into law a bill that, while titled civil unions, actually establishes same-sex marriage because it excludes opposite-sex couples.  And while a majority of Americans have serious misgivings about the prosecution of the war in Iraq, New Hampshire attitudes are out there with the moveon.org crowd, judging from a resolution recently passed by the House calling for an immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq.

New Hampshire is no longer a barometer of the ideals and values of this nation.  It has forfeited its claim on the first-in-the-nation primary.    

Welcome to the NEW New Hampshire. PART ONE

Below is a news article that appeared in the Laconia Daily Sun (NH) this past Saturday. It's a heartwarming story of what some students are learning thanks to their taxpayer-funded "education." It is unavailable online, but is reprinted in its entirety with permission from the publisher. Read the story. I will be followup on this in a separate posting. Feel free to leave a comment...
.

LHS GAY/STRAIGHT ALLIANCE INSPIRED BY RECEPTION AT STATEHOUSE

by Ron Tunning
The Laconia Daily Sun
Saturday, April 14, 2007
.
CONCORD — “It was a blast,” said Jon Arsenault.
.
“It was so awesome,” contributed Steven Gonzalez.
.
“It was so much more interesting and informative than we’d ever expected,” added Jessie Dawson.
.
Those were only some of the remarks overheard from a group of Laconia High School students who spent Tuesday at the N.H. State House as the official guests of Reps. Judie Reever and Beth Arsenault.
.
The contingent, which included 18 students and three adults, were greeted upon their arrival by the two Laconia House members in the Capitol’s “Hall of Flags” before being led on a tour of the historic building by Virginia Drew, the Director of the NH General Court Visitors Center while the two representatives hurried off for a Democratic caucus being held prior to the opening of the day’s legislative session.
.
Following a visit to the Senate Chamber and a walk along the building’s corridors during which Drew offered a running dialogue on the history of the building and its many historic artifacts, the group was escorted to the gallery overlooking Representative Hall just as the legislative session was set to commence.
.
As House protocol demands, the students, members of the LHS Gay/Straight United, were welcomed by House members by a standing round of applause. “We were made to feel so welcome,” said a surprised Dawson, who serves with Gonzalez as co-president of the organization. “We really weren’t certain how we’d be received.”
.
The timing of the group’s visit could not have been more fitting. Just last week the N.H. House overwhelmingly approved legislation legalizing civil unions for same-sex partners, with it anticipated that the Senate will follow suit and send the legislation to Governor John Lynch for his signature.
.
“We’re watching history being made in New Hampshire,” observed Gonzalez, a LHS senior who helped to form the Gay/Straight United earlier this school year to foster greater tolerance and understanding among homosexual and heterosexual students. “It’s just impossible to describe the impact of having the walls of discrimination removed.”
.
Before the House could begin its deliberations on the budget, which topped its agenda for the day, the students were led from the gallery to a Senate meeting room where they were greeted by Senator Kathy Sgambati. After welcoming the students and thanking them for their interest in the workings of state government, Sen. Sgambati invited questions.
.
“Where do you stand on civil unions,” Gonzalez wasted no time in inquiring.

The senator assured the group that she supported civil unions as well as legislation that protects the rights of gays and lesbians to adopt children and serve as foster parents. Her years of experience at the NH Department of Health and Human Services, she recalled, which included supporting the well-being of families and children, had introduced her to many gays and lesbians who had proved to be outstanding parents. “And there are many heterosexuals who are not good parents,” she said, noting that sexual orientation has nothing to do with parenting skills.

Being summoned to the Senate, Sgambati introduced the students to the state Democratic Party Chair Ray Buckley before making her departure.
.
Buckley, an openly gay man who served several terms in the N.H. House and helped pave the way for the Democratic takeover of the Senate last November, spoke openly of the challenges he faced as a young, gay adolescent growing up in Belmont. He was joined by Rep. Maureen “Mo” Baxley (D-Andover), who also serves as the Executive Director of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition, in encouraging the students to become and remain involved in the political process.
.
“It was very powerful to hear Mr. Buckley’s story,” said Dawson, “and to realize that there are people in government who understand and share the challenges we face.”
“We just didn’t expect to meet people who are so openly gay and comfortable with it,” Gonzalez added. “That was so amazing.”
.
A number of students indicated that the experience has motivated them to become engaged in the political process and to let their representatives know how much their support is appreciated.
.
“And I know some of us are going to ask to serve as Senate pages,” Dawson said, referring to an invitation by Sen. Sgambati that they apply. “We’re anxious to participate.”
Stay tuned for PART TWO... My turn.

Government in the stone age... [Update 1]

.
With each passing day, society plunges ever deeper into the digital age. The number of people not participating in the era of instant communication and absolute choice in media is dwindling to a few holdouts most probably due to fear, a lack of desire, or habit. The Internet has become the tool of ordinary people, both rich and poor, worldwide. And then there's the US Senate...
.
Our friend Liz Mair from GOPProgress reports:
Great.  I thought we were done with this nonsense about certain Senators placing secret holds on legislation that might cause them a spot of bother, back last year when this site, together with Porkbusters and TPM, helped rumble Ted Stevens and Robert Byrd as the Tweedle Dum(b) and Tweedle Dee who put secret holds on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act-- you know, that thing that allows you to find out where government spends your money, using a Google-like database.
.
Turns out I was wrong.  There's this bill out there, sponsored Russ Feingold, and co-sponsored by 13 Republicans, that would require electronic filing of Senate campaign finance reports-- or, otherwise put, for Senate candidates to file the same way everyone else in the entire universe does these days, which just happens to be using a method that allows for greater citizen scrutiny of candidates' financial doings.  Some lame-o Senator has put a secret hold on it.
Liz is digging hard to find out which "honorable" Senator used this arcane rule to stymie citizen access to how exactly they spend campaign cash. Click here to read what she's learned. Some are saying that there is no secret hold and the bill will come up. Has the "heat" caused them to withdraw it? Even so, it is critical to all users of the New Media that they urge their Senators to vote for the bill and join the rest of the world.
.
Why wouldn't they wish to join the technological age? Are they cavemen? Or do they have something to hide? I'll bet they all wish for the good 'ole days when the old-guard main-stream media was the only game in town. If they didn't report it, people didn't know it.
.
[UPDATE] Liz has more on this. As noted above, it wasn't a "secret hold", but it still appears someone wants it slowed....

Spend it like you've got it!

.
What does New Hampshire want?
Responsible fiscal policy.
What did the New Hampshire House deliver?
A record $10.4 Billion state budget.

More information at: NHelection.info

April 18, 2007

Ted Nugent on "gun free" zones

.
Whenever the issue of gun control versus the rights of American individuals to defend themselves comes up, my "go-to" person is Ted Nugent. Long an advocate of the belief that we should have MORE guns, not less, in the hands of law-abiding citizens, as am I, he weighed in this week on the Virginia Tech tragedy, as I hoped he would. He appeared with Mike Smerconish, sitting in on the Glenn Beck program on CNN Headline News. This was the money line:

"Does anybody join me in realizing that 32 people were killed because the killer wasn`t stopped?"

Exactly my thoughts when I first heard about the massacre. As usual, Ted says it in his own way, unvarnished and no BS. Here's the entire exchange:
.
.
Ted, a lot of folks wonder, what does Ted Nugent think as he reacts to a tragedy such as this?
.
TED NUGENT, MUSICIAN: Well, I think with the same heart-and-soul logic that America joins you today with a grieving and shattered heart, Michael.
.
The Nugent family is praying as hard as we have ever prayed for the families, and equally so for the pulse of America that is allowing this mind-set that somehow gun-free zones, with irrefutable evidence that all these tragedies, all these mass shootings have occurred across the board in gun-free zones.
.
Yet, there are still those amongst those who desire the very system of a gun-free zone that facilitates and enables this kind of unstoppable slaughter.
.
And my stomach is absolutely sickened right now. I`m spending a lot of time with my children, with the local schools and local law enforcement, as I have, following every tragedy, and, obviously, just as a concerned parent, to make sure that the tactics, the level of awareness, the observation increase and upgrade is taking place in my neighborhoods. And I encourage all parents to be that involved and demand an upgrade, based on the evidence that we have now.
.
SMERCONISH: In other words, Ted Nugent says there will be those who will say this is exhibit A now as to why there needs to be increased gun regulation. And your reply is, indeed, there was gun regulation on the Virginia Tech campus. It was a gun-free zone. And, if you can`t have safety there, then it tells you something.
.
NUGENT: And, again, Michael, you know, I`m just a guitar player, but I like to pay attention to my wonderful country. And the evidence is unlimited, non-stop, irrefutable once again across this country.
.

In Oregon, where a Columbine tragedy was unfolding, it was a student who went to his truck and got a .22 squirrel rifle and stopped the mass murder. It was a citizen, an off-duty cop in Salt Lake City, that stopped an armed monster from killing citizens at random. He stopped it.

It was just up the road from Virginia Tech where an Appalachia law school, students once again retrieved legally owned firearms and stopped an armed assault. Who is not getting this information? Who is pretending this isn`t how it works? Those are the people I`m really angry at.

.
SMERCONISH: Ted, this morning, on my radio program -- and I knew this comment was coming -- and you have heard it before -- more than one individual said to me, why does someone need a .9-millimeter Glock? That N-word, need, would you respond to that?
.
NUGENT: Well, Michael, there are hundreds of millions -- and I hope people will write this down some day -- hundreds of millions of law-abiding American families with hundreds of millions of lawfully owned guns, none of which are going to be used in violence, crime or accident.
.
The sheer numbers of zeros following the decimal point in the percentage of guns used in crime is beyond inconsequential. That does not compromise or negate the heartbreaking tragedy of any kind of accident, any kind of violent crime.
.
But when will we learn that, at Luby`s cafeteria, at Pearl, Mississippi, at the pizza parlor in New York City, where Mayor Bloomberg thought it was reasonable gun control to disarm cops? That`s how insane this has gotten. There`s been quite a debate at Virginia Tech, where lawfully possessed firearms and gun owners with lawfully procured government scrutinized concealed weapons permits are forbidden to use those concealed weapons permits on the Virginia Tech grounds.
.
Does anybody join me in realizing that 32 people were killed because the killer wasn`t stopped? I don`t want to come off like I know all the answers. But, again, the evidence is overwhelming. If a good guy with a gun can stop evil crime and tragedy so often, why can`t we apply that policy instead of Sarah Brady`s gun-free zone policy?
.
SMERCONISH: Hey, Nuge, thank you
 
____________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Featured Resource for this Post
 
 
It is crucial for a trader to have an internet merchant account for online transactions, So that they can easily carry out their merchant services. Merchants do have their business cards for their recognition but having a visa card can help them to get personal loan and easy insurance. If the trader has an extensive online business & internet account set up then it will be more feasible for him to file an online tax return.
 
____________________________________________________________________________________________
 

ABOUT CIVIL UNIONS AND DEMOCRATS AND DISCRIMINATION

This picks up on a post below about Senator Kathleen Sgambati who supports the civil union bill that recently passed the House because "she can't support 'discrimination against any group.'"  The Senator obviously is just repeating the Democrat "soundbite" on civil unions.

If the standard is no "discrimination against any group," then how can the Senator support the smoking ban?  After all that discriminates against people who like to, or for all we know may be genetically predisposed to, smoke.  The Senator would also have to oppose speed limits because that discriminates against people who like to, or for all we know may be genetically predisposed to, drive fast.  And let's not forget the Interest and Dividends tax.  That discriminates against people who like to, or for all we know may be genetically predisposed to, save and invest.

With reference to marriage, how can the Senator support prohibiting parents and adult children to marry, if the standard to be applied is "no discrimination against any group"?  How can she support restricting marriage to only two persons?  How can she support marriage being for life, when that discriminates against folks who may like to, or for all we know may be genetically predisposed to, marry for shorter durations?

What the Senator really means is that she doesn't support discrimination against any group that she doesn't think should be discriminated against.  Which simply begs the question why does the Senator believe that gays and lesbians should not be discriminated against where marriage is involved.

 

Want Fries With That?

What does New Hampshire want?
Efficient transportation.
What did the New Hampshire House deliver?
A study on trans fats.
More information at: NHelection.info

I couldn't have said it better... Notable Quotes

I proudly count myself as an "ordinary person"-- you know, the working-stiff, blue collar sort that is mostly what makes up America. I consider the people that I meet in daily life to be just as (if not more) smart and discerning as any of the more famous members of the chattering classes. Here are a few examples of thoughts and words that I have recently come across. Ordinary folks speaking notable quotes...
.
Friend Jorge Mesa Tejada of Hampstead, while discussing the potential of the New Media, including the Blogosphere:

"The strength of a dictator is not armies or secret police. It is the fact that they control information, which keeps people ignorant. The result is fear and compliance."

Having escaped a dictatorship in Colombia for a better life in America, as a citizen by choice, he should know. The New Media and the rise of citizen journalism means independence and the free, unfettered flow of information back and forth between people.
.
The Citizen reports on one family affected by this week's generally expected flooding of nearby Jewett Brook--Ordinary folks who I see at Church every week:
Kevin and Cheryl Laurent also live on Winter Street and are well aware, from past storms, that the brook can quickly turn into a river with heavy rains. "We saw a computer monitor float by," said Cheryl Laurent. Kevin Laurent was trying to keep his sump pump throwing water out of the basement faster than it could get in but he managed to joke,

"We are just hoping the city doesn't start charging us for waterfront property."

Shhh! Don't give them any ideas!

Finally, there was this from Jim Beaumont of New Boston, who wrote in a letter to the editor in the dead-tree version of the Union Leader, on the "Moms of Fury" military families' visit to Rep. Hodes' office:

I had to chuckle. Not for the families upset with Rep. Paul Hodes, but for the majority of voters who sent this nitwit to Washington. Hodes and Rep. Carol Shea Porter are two Democrat liberals who pretended to be moderates so they could get their cushy jobs in Washington and rubber stamp all the moonbat policies of Pelosi and Reid.

Well said gentlemen!

Words of advice

Bob Jones of the Northeast Network POW/MIA forwards the following, noting that "This was sent to me by a gent who retired from the Marine Corps as a Colonel and now a defense lawyer in NC. When I knew him he was a Marine Lt. in command of a Company of Marines in Vietnam."

Political Wisdom….

1. Never, ever, refer to this or any war as “unpopular”. I defy anyone to give one example of a “popular” war, especially among those who have to fight. It is empty and vicious rhetoric used by foolish politicians. War is a cruel, ruthless, ugly endeavor that once committed to, is a life and death struggle for those fighting. War has only three possible outcomes: Victory, Defeat or, Postponement.
.
2. Hold politicians accountable for their decisions. There is no “Do Over” for their decision to commit the lives and futures of our youth to a deadly conflict. Lives sacrificed can never be regained. There is no excuse for them being “misled, uninformed or pressured” to vote “for” war and have regret later. They can “abstain” if unsure in any way. They have a duty to investigate, debate and decide before they vote. Those who play political games with the lives of our citizens are the most despicable among us. There is absolutely no room for error for them on the issue of war. Any politician who regrets their vote to commit to a war should be asked to resign. They obviously have little awareness of the gravity of their decisions or the meaning of the concept of commitment.
3. Reverently mourn the sacrifice of our warriors. Shun all who use their sacrifice and that of their families, friends and loved ones for political gain or attention. Visit a national cemetery regularly and, remind yourself of the extraordinary life you live that is paid for by the life they gave. Allow no Soldier, Sailor, Marine, Airman or Coast Guardsman to be interred with only his or her Honor Guard in attendance.
.
4. Demand that your Congressman and Senator attend an interment at a national cemetery weekly. They have time for lobbyists, political party meetings, election campaigning and media interviews so there is no excuse for them to travel 20 minutes to Arlington or the other cemeteries in Washington while in session or, at home. They need constant reminders of the gravity of their decisions, votes and words.
.
5. Reservists and National Guardsmen and their families require our support in a more personal manner. Their lives are firmly rooted in the communities where they live. Their children and wives or husbands have had their lives disrupted without the support of a close-knit active duty community. Maintain contact and friendships with these families. Call them regularly and include as you would before. Put your personal political views aside. Exercise restraint while these minutemen are in harms way jeopardizing their future to serve your country, protect your way of life and ensure the safety of your children. You can do more harm to them than the enemy, with a careless disregard of your responsibilities that accompany your freedom of speech. If you want to spout off, call a talk show where there are people who will support or challenge your opinions.
.
6. Employers should keep in contact with the spouse or parents of their employees who have been called to active duty. Regardless of the laws guaranteeing a reservist’s or National Guardsman’s re-employment right’s; they carry the burden that their return to work may be only long enough to satisfy the law and that their livelihood and career will be temporary. Your contact their family and reassurance is vital to them. But, beware that when they return they will be changed. They will have a more heightened sense of loyalty, teamwork, discipline and efficiency than when they left. They will possess a maturity and common sense that can only be acquired hardship and duress. They will have learned to function under complicated and vague sets of guidelines that require decision making in life or death situations.
.
7. Teachers must keep their politics in the “teachers lounge” and out of the classroom at all grade levels. They have little knowledge of which student’s father, mother uncle, aunt, sister, brother or cousin is risking their life. A political anti-war statement or disparaging remark may be hurtful to a child relative of a servicemen and will, certainly, undermine respect students may have for you.
.
8. Parents should be a positive example to your children. Teach them American values of duty, honor, integrity, self-reliance, compassion and honesty. Make your children a generation that deserve and respects, the sacrifices made daily by our troops in their defense.

April 17, 2007

AMENDMENT END-GAME

What happens if Governor John Lynch succeeds in getting his constitutional amendment on the ballot in 2008?  Lynch gets the credit for “finally” “solving” the “education funding crisis.”  And his coattails once again sweep the Democrats to large majorities in the House and Senate.  Indeed, they may even sweep U.S. Senator Sununu back into the private sector.

What happens if Lynch doesn’t get his amendment on the 2008 ballot?  Then things get interesting. 

By then, we should know how much an “adequate education” costs, because more than a year will have passed since the Lynch definition was passed, which is plenty of time for some consulting firm to say what the definition costs.  The methodologies that these consulting firms use to determine the cost of an adequate education are thoroughly capricious, which means one can make a case that the cost is practically anything one wants the cost to be.  The likelihood is that, at a minimum, the cost will be at least $1.6 billion because that appears to be the minimum that the Democrats will accept.

If Lynch’s amendment isn’t on the 2008 ballot, then candidate for reelection Lynch is going to have to explain how the entire $1.6 billion (or more) will be funded with state taxes.  My guess is that he won’t run for reelection, if his amendment doesn’t make it out of the Legislature, because he would find himself forced to choose between supporting an income or sales tax and repudiating his own “definition” of an “adequate education.”

Why then are House Republicans so conflicted about opposing the Lynch amendment?

It’s not like the Lynch amendment is a good amendment.  To the contrary, it codifies all of Claremont’s ukases except for the ukase that state taxes fund every dollar of the mythical cost of an adequate education.  Instead, state taxes have to fund “only” 50 percent of the cost.   

Some Republicans claim that the Lynch amendment is the “best” we can get, and the alternative is an income tax.  That’s a loser’s mentality.  For Republicans to support the Lynch amendment is not statesmanlike compromise, it is abject surrender.    

PO'd Republicans

.
Former NH state senator Rob Boyce has written an interesting analysis of the last election. Guess what? It's OUR fault- the conservatives... well, not me, because I voted. Anyway, this is what Bob has to say:

Democrat voters not to blame

With all the mess being caused by the Democrats in Congress and in states all across the country it is not the Democrat voters nor the squishy ill-defined “moderate” or “independent” voters nor the Republican voters who actually showed up last fall to vote that are to blame.
.
No the blame lies with the conservatives – Hillary’s “Vast right wing conspiracy” – those who stayed home. I’ve heard from many friends who thought staying home would “give a spanking” to the members of congress who – spent too much – wouldn’t close the border – weren’t conservative enough. These are the ones who claim to be Reaganites but forgot that one of Reagan’s prime messages was that someone who is with you 75% of the time is your friend not your enemy.
.
Those congressmen and women who were tossed out last fall sure got a spanking but it is the country that is paying. The “I won’t vote ‘cause they are not conservative enough” crowd bears the whole blame. I’ve analyzed the numbers in New Hampshire (easier to crunch numbers in one small state than the whole country) and what I found was: in the two Congressional districts, both GOP incumbents were not considered very conservative – Charley Bass in district 2 even touted his record of not voting with the GOP majority. Both had easily won re-elections in 2004. I looked at ’04 because it was the last non presidential election.
.
What the numbers tell me is that : 1) The Democrat challenger picked up votes from the ‘04 election. 2) Both incumbents lost votes from ’04. 3) Neither challenger picked up enough votes to beat the GOP incumbent’s ’04 numbers.
.
What were missing were the p*ssed off Republican conservatives. They stayed home.
.
Some stayed home because President Bush had disappointed them in some way, but not because they wanted us out of Iraq. They may have been upset over the way the war was being run, they may have been upset over the administration’s willingness to provide amnesty for illegal aliens. Some were upset that President Bush did not veto the bloated pork barrel spending bills the GOP congress handed him (heck, I was upset at Reagan for not vetoing one back in the 80’s but I still voted for him and only his being dead and it being unconstitutional would prevent me voting for him again.)
.
The blame for all that is going on in Washington (and the state houses) lies not with Democrats or independents but with Conservatives and Republicans who decided to stay home on election day. That is unconscionable, especially when we have the Afghanistan and Iraqi voters with their purple dyed digits illustrating how important voting is to our way of life.
.
The first of the congressional primaries are about a year away, the Presidential primaries are as well. During those coming months I hope that the stay at homes pay close attention to the damage they are doing and vow every day to go to the polls next time and put it right by voting (and dragging their friends and relatives with them). Shame on them.
.
Hon. Robert Boyce
Alton Bay, NH
Former state senator

Wards of the state

What does New Hampshire want?
Effective, flexible education policy.
What did the New Hampshire House deliver?
Mandatory school attendance until age 18.

More information at: NHelection.info

This bill has a House hearing on 4/18/2007 at 10am!
Contact your legislators.

April 16, 2007

If only...

someone else on the campus had a gun. Maybe the number wouldn't have been so high. May God help the families and students in their hour of grief.
.
+
+
+
+
+

Exclusive GraniteGrok interview with Sen. Sununu

GraniteGrok.com exclusive interview with NH Senator John E. Sununu about supporting the troops and giving them the money they need. (We are greatly appreciative to him for doing this on short notice.) He decries the partisanship & pork that has been injected into a simple military funding bill. The video is approximately six minutes long. Watch it and leave a comment to let us know what you think. Undoubtably, the Senator will read the comments too...
.
. .
You'll note the "workman attire" worn by the interviewer. Such is the life of a ciitizen journalist. Working in the factory one minute. Interviewing a US Senator the next. So goes the world of the New Media...
.

200 NH Guardsmen Activated for Statewide Flooding

Soldiers from the NHNG survey flood damage
in Alstead NH on Oct. 13, 2005.
.
CONCORD - Gov. John Lynch today activated 200 N.H. National Guardsmen in response to statewide flooding and road closures across New Hampshire.
.
As of noon, 125 soldiers and 75 airmen were deploying to at least seven communities including  Greenville, Rochester, Farmington, Milton, Hampton, New Boston, and Raymond to assist first responders with evacuations, traffic control points and other flood-related emergencies.
.
The NH National Guard possesses a wide set of capabilities and expertise that can be deployed anywhere in the state to assist first responders to include trained personnel, equipment, communications and transportation assets.
.
It is the third time since October 2005 that the NH Guard has been activated for storm-related emergencies in the state.
.
 In addition to serving the citizens of New Hampshire, more than half of the NH National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen have supported combat and peacekeeping operations overseas as well as humanitarian missions in Louisiana after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
.
The National Guard is the only branch of the military that has the unique dual mission of providing forces at both the state and federal levels and is the only military service that abides by two Oaths-of-Office, one to the governor and one to the President of the United States.

Joe Biden: All about the war

Delaware Senator Joe Biden, seeking the Democratic presidential
nomination paid a visit to Laconia, NH on April 14th, 2007.
.
Joe Biden brought his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination to Laconia Saturday afternoon. Hosted by the Belknap County Democrats, the event had, at its peak, somewhere around 100 or so people. The energy level of those in the room, certainly high at the start, seemed to wane as the day wore on. By the time the Delaware Senator ended his appearance, it seemed just himself and a small handful of attendees (including me) had any left. And that's too bad, because Biden had an awful lot to say.
.
Indeed, Joe Biden lived up to his reputation as a policy wonk always able to give the long answer to a simple question. While that works for political junkies like me, it tends to drag for more normal people. By the end of the event (which started some 45 minutes late to begin with) the hundred people had dwindled to no more than thirty diehards. It wasn't because Biden isn't a good speaker, or lacking energy himself, it was just the content and specificity of what he was saying probably flew over the heads of those in the room. And, while he did a fair amount of Bush-bashing, it was delivered in a polite and measured fashion-- not what the base of the Democrats is desirous of these days. These people want Bush's head on a platter, and Senator Biden is, in my opinion, too much the long-time Senator type to deliver- to his credit, I'd say.
.
If you believe, as I do, that the most important issue we face as a nation today is the war, then  you would have found Senator Biden's remarks, as I did, interesting and relevant. While I do not agree with many of his points about the need for the Iraq war, or about how he views the President's prosecution of it, Senator Biden is at least taking a serious and realistic approach. To me, he is the old school politician in the opposition-- harsh, yet measured, and he does accept reality as it presents itself. There is no "bring the troops home NOW, stop the funding" mantra coming from this particular candidate. This separates him from the rest. That I like. Unfortunately, I don't think the base of his party, primary voters, agrees.
.
Joe Biden makes a point to local Democrats during a campaign stop .
.
The thing that really struck me during Biden's presentation and the Q & A that followed was the fact that it was all about the war and the state of the world at large. Calling himself an "internationalist," the long-time senator laid out elaborate and detailed plans and ideas for ending the Iraq war, while still (if you read between the lines) recognizing that we are going to have to stay involved in the region for a long time. Drawing the contrast between him and the rest of the Democratic field, he notes that while they say "end it now. Come home now," he is the only candidate that asks "then what?" While I disagree with his solution-- a partition of Iraq with input and grand dialogue from all in the area, friend or foe, I give him credit for asking the question.
.
It becomes quite obvious that Senator Biden is a serious guy. So serious, in fact, that I believe he is that rarest of Democrats in that he DOES see the gravity of the threat we face. One almost gets the feeling that some of his anti-Bush rhetoric is simply added to satisfy Democratic voters he needs to win the primary. I don't see that happening, which is really too bad. Joe Biden is one Democrat on my very short list of those I could live with if I have to accept one as the next president. Joe is a realist, and that beats the heated rhetoric and platitudes offered by most of the rest of the pack. Given the current state of the activists who will decide the nominee, while Joe Biden gets a fairly positive reception from people like me, a conservative Republican, it won't get him the votes he'll need to win.
Sen Biden in an elevated exchange with an activist.
His message doesn't seem to wash with the far left.
.
Oh well-- at least there's the Sunday talking heads shows.
.
Here's a YouTube of Joe, after the event, discussing health care. Normally this subject, in a Democratic setting, would have gotten more attention than the war...
.
.

April 15, 2007

New Hampshire's Gold Star Mothers Day

.
During the First World War, in May 1918, President Woodrow Wilson approved the suggestion of the Women's Committee of National Defenses recommending that American women should wear a black band on the upper left arm adorned with a gold star. Each star representing a family member who had given his or her life for their country. President Woodrow Wilson first used the term "Gold Star Mother" in his Letter to the Women's Committee. Grace D. Seibold, who lost her son, 1st Lieutenant George Seibold, in France, is recognized as the first “Gold Star” mother.
.
The mothers of New Hampshire’s fallen heroes have made the ultimate sacrifice for human freedom, and we owe them the most profound debt of gratitude.  More than anyone, they bear the deep emotional burden and loss of those who have laid down their lives for the cause of liberty.  New Hampshire owes these dignified and graceful mothers of freedom our deepest admiration and our promise that the sacrifice of their children will never be forgotten. 
.
To assure that their children would not be forgotten, in 1999, Gov. Jeanne Shaheen signed into law RSA 4:13-h “Gold Star Mother’s Day” calling for the proper observance of the first Sunday after Easter which shall be known as Gold Star Mother's Day recognizing and honoring all mothers who have lost sons or daughters while on duty in the United States armed forces. The governor shall urge the citizens of the state to observe this day with appropriate events.
.
Each year, this observance is an opportunity to offer our solemn respect to Gold Star Mothers and renew our ongoing pledge that New Hampshire will always remember those who died while wearing the uniform of the United States and forever honor their families' sacrifice.
.
In the words of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944,
"There is nothing adequate which anyone in any place can say to those who are entitled to display the gold star in their windows America lives in freedom because of the sacrifices of America's finest citizens and of the mothers who raised them.."
From Karen Thurston, Blue Star Mothers of NH

Joe knows...

Senator Joe Biden reveals where he gets the information that goes into his long and intricate discussions on policy. Joe Biden knows who he has to see if he expects to be the next president...
.
Shameless self promotion? You bet! Are we taking ourselves too seriously here at the 'Grok? Nah. Having fun while being citizen journalists? Absolutely! Why not? It's New Hampshire. It's the middle of April, and we're having a blizzard. What else are we gonna do?
.

To YouTube or not to YouTube?

Regular readers will note that we have a newfound toy here at the 'Grok: the YouTube. That's right-- what Santa giveth, Santa taketh away-- and that's what happened to my teenage son's cool little camcorder, last year's Christmas present. Sorry son-- maybe Santa will get Dad a new one and you can have yours back. But I digress...
.
With numerous events and activities in the area, things have worked out that the 'Grok was there, camera in hand. With lots of quality footage, and simple computer equipment, it becomes a question of "how much?" Do I or don't I just keep sharing what I've observed with video accompaniment? I guess the answer is best given with another question: "why not?"
.
To YouTube or not YouTube? YouTube.

Sen. Biden on NH Primary

Senator Joe Biden, seeking the Democratic nomination for president, visited Laconia NH today. I videotaped the entire event and will put together a small clip of some of the highlights, as well as my thoughts in another post. I had the opportunity after the town hall meeting was over to ask the Senator his thoughts on the accelerated primary cycle. Like Senator McCain, and Rudy Giuliani, Biden believes it actually enhances the importance of NH (and Iowa) in the process...

April 14, 2007

Is this what the voters really wanted? Civil unions?

While covering the Joe Biden prez bid visit to the Lakes Region here in central NH, I had the opportunity to rub elbows with the local Democrats of Belknap County, who were very gracious, knowing that a conservaative Republican was in their midst. While there, I ran into my state senator, Democrat Kathleen Sgambati, who was kind enough to answer a couple of questions for me.
.
NH District 4 Senator Kathleen Sgambati listens to Sen
Joe Biden in Laconia Saturday April 14.
.
I asked her how she planned to vote on the same sex civil union legislation that has passed the house. She responded that she "expects to support it," stating that she can't support "discrimination against any group." I pressed her point, noting that if that were the case, doesn't a civil union bill allowing for same-sex partnerships leave out those in heterosexual relationships, in effect, discriminating against them? Why not grant such status to people simply living together? She responded that she is looking at Republican Sen. Clegg's amendment that would address that. "So you favor that?" I asked. "I'm looking at it." Was her reply.
.
We'll have to wait and see, as the civil union bill, fast-tracked to this point, has suddenly stalled. I wonder how many old-fashioned blue collar Democrats really go for this stuff. I wonder if all those voters, seemingly mad at the Republicans across the board in this last election, knew what they were getting when then cast that Democratic ballot last November? Civil unions? Here in NH? Like Vermont and New Jersey and Mass? I don''t think this is what the voters had in mind when they gave the Republicans the heave-ho...

Meet the New Press- Today at 11AM

Once again, we have a busy show put together for today. Among the topics we will discuss will be:
  • A 16% increase in the state budget!? Republican State Rep. Bill Tobin will fill us in on the details.
  • The "Moms of Fury" hit the road this week and joined a peacenik "sit-in" at Sen. Sununu's Manchester office. GraniteGrok was there.
  • Also, we got a huge amount of traffic over the past weekend, thanks to the "Moms of Fury" YouTube. We'll talk about what that was like.
  • Hugh Hewitt will join us to discuss his new book, "A Mormon in the White House? What every American should know about Mitt Romney". We'll also talk about his recent interview piece about 30 books your college freshman should have read by the end of their freshman year--- if you're getting your money's worth.
  • Civil Unions in NH? The "fast track" seems to have derailed. Could Gov. Lynch have something to do with it? Karen Testerman of Cornerstone Policy Research joins us. If you read the papers, you know she's leading the counter-charge against the onslaught against family values in NH.
  • Techie talk with Skip-- We're running a test this week for the livestreaming!
It all starts at 11 AM today on Newstalk 1490 WEMJ. If you're not in the Central NH broadcast area, check it out later on the MTNP Podcast page. Starting next week, if all goes well, you'll be able to listen anywhere you have a computer and an Internet connection.

April 13, 2007

The Democrats' Dilemma-- Another example

In yesterday's VLog, I captured what I think is the essence of the problems the Democrats face as the reality of governing and having to make decisions sets in. It is one thing to rail against some issue, in today's case, the war, without having to provide a solution. If you can accept the reality of the new world war with Islamofascism, and the fact that whether we stay in Iraq or leave, they will follow us, then you understand something must be done about it. I don't grant that many Democrats have had that much deep thought on the issue, however. I believe their dilemma is caused by the chance that enough Americans have, and if they actually stop and think about what the Democrats are advocating: defeat, they will vote them out at the next election.
.
Dem Cong. Paul Hodes. Will he take heat from both sides?
.
I'm not alone in my observation of the internal turmoils looming within the Democratic Party over the issue of the war. The April 12th National Journal's Hotline Blogometer had this to report:

DEM FIELD: They Have Their Work Cut Out For Them


Netroots leaders are using the MoveOn.org Iraq forum as launching pad to "Stop[] the Obama/Edwards/Clinton Charade on Iraq." MyDD's Matt Stoller elaborates:
Of the top-tier candidates, only Edwards is close to articulating a real policy on Iraq, but it's clear from his lunatic statements on Iran that he is in the thrall of the national security state. ... Obama still uses the war on terror frame and on the Moveon call venerated Reagan's approach to diplomacy. That's pathetic ... To Edwards, Obama, and Clinton supporters who let their candidates get away with this, you are letting this happen with your silence and enabling. Stop it. It's your responsibility to stop it.
Fellow MyDDer Chris Bowers voices a very similar message: "I believe that those who wish to lead the Democratic Party are obligated to be truthful with our activists about how large they expect the continued American military presence in Iraq to be if they were to become President. Will their residual forces require 10,000, 30,000 or 75,000 troops? What will those troops be doing, and how long will they be doing it? It is equally an obligation of progressive activists to find out the details of these plans, and be truthful with each other when discussing what each candidate actually means by withdrawal and ending the war in Iraq."
First noting that recent polling shows just as many Americans support removing "most" troops as support removing "all" troops, Bowers urges netrooters not to let "progressive policy elites staffing think tanks, congress, and presidential campaigns" get away with proposing merely a reduction in US involvement in Iraq when they should be ending it. Bowers on why bloggers are part of the problem: "Because we like Edwards or Obama, we have no problem letting them slide on this contradiction, which makes it impossible for us to credibly call out candidates like Hillary Clinton on the contradiction."
Now, I disagree with their notion that a majority of Americans, once they understand the scope of the problem, would support anything less than victory.

April 12, 2007

Ruminations - 4/12/07

Well, I said that blogging (from me) would light, and it sure has been!  However, Doug's been real busy playing with his new toy - VLogging!  And has seemed to have gotten a hit right out of the box with his YouTube from Congressman Hodes (D-NH, D1) - An InstaLaunche resulted!  And a lot of links from others (including our friend Pat over at AnkleBitingPundits).

*****

In the mean time, the project to get MTNP livestreaming using Winamp and Shoutcast continues on.  We've progressed from (Winamp playing) to (Winamp / DSP to Shoutcast on one system to Winamp catching it on another) to (Winamp on one node sourcing a stream to Shoutcast on another and catching it on another).  But only on my internal network.

With the help of our buddy DCE from WeekendPundit and his brother John, the next step is to put the server out on the 'Net and start experimenting with that.  We'll try a few different players and ways to catch the stream, so hopefully in a couple of weeks, Meet The New Press will be out on the 'Net!

***** 

Speaking of Pat, he did an interview here at AnkleBitingPundits with Congressman Chris Cannon (UT-03) concerning immigration.  Now, the 'Grok likes Pat a lot (as Doug, Pat, and I all own Meet The New Press together), but Doug and I do tend to razz him a bit on immigration as we don't quite see eye to eye (we're not all the hep on guest workers and his take is not primarily on a wall).  THAT said, it is a well done interview - Pat does a good job.  Go listen!  Really!

*****

My local paper, the Laconia Citizen, has a short piece (sorry, only the dead paper version) on the NH legislators adding $3 million to help support the local dairy farmers as the weather hasn't c0operated with plantings, costs are up, and the national pricing for milk has stayed the same the last few years.

Yup - government sets the price to what they think it should be, causes a distortion in the market, and then uses more taxpayer money fix the problem they started in the first place by trying to regulate prices.

Hey, why stop with milk farmers?  I know some programmers that have suffered due to globalization....

Government should stay out of the marketplace in this area.  Supply and Demand will take care of inequities and pricing.   

*****

This whole Imus thing?  When rappers are held to the same standard, I'll take it seriously.  Double standards hurt everyone.  Political correctness ("I can say it but you cannot") is prejudiced.

*****

I always thought that the Constitution said that foreign policy was the domain of the Executive branch.  Seems that when Ms. Pelosi ascended the Speakership and being third in line to the Presidency, I guess she thought she gets the chance to practice in Syria and possibly Iran.

Has she read the reviews from our enemies on her performance so far?  Listen to her, listen to our "non-friends"  - what's the difference?

*****

Well, back to streaming stuff...... 



 

The Democrats' dilemma. Between a Rock and a Hard Place- The Movie

As one looks to the future, and to what many people know what must happen in the new world war with Islamofascism-- a win -- it becomes obvious that the Democrats are in quite a pickle. On the one hand, they owe no small part of their recent electoral majority to the left wing, antiwar crowd, and a US military defeat would suit them just fine. On the other, there is the reality that, like it or not, the enemy will keep coming at us. As many supposed "moderate" Democrats offer deadlines and withdrawal plans, while still claiming to "support the troops," the lefties are calling for an end--NOW.
.
The following video illustrates quite nicely what I mean. It features 2nd congressional district representative Democrat Paul Hodes in his office meeting with pro-victory supporters last Friday, who gathered to tell him their displeasure with his recent vote on the military appropriations bill calling for the withdrawal and funding only up until a date definite. In addition, the film shows a group of antiwar peaceniks gathered for a "sit-in" at Senator Sununu's Manchester office on Monday, calling for an immediate end to the war. Given their views, and those of Rep. Hodes, you can see the coming clash...

Dems to "fix" college loans. Uh-oh.

.
As the Lambert family finds itself in the final stretch of its first foray into the financial quagmire of grants, loans, and scholarships involved with sending a child into college (Really now, who doesn't love the FAFSA form?), we often find ourselves searching the web for something on the topic.
.
In the course of such research, I stumbled across an interesting and somewhat disturbing story located on one of our favorite blogsites here at the 'Grok-- GOPProgress. It detailed a little-known battle taking place behind the scenes over private sector versus government distribution and administration of federal student aid loans. And, as one might guess, because it involves fundamentally opposing world views (public vs private), it becomes a partisan issue, thus proving again that party affiliation does, in fact matter. Jess Mahone writes
One reason Republicans lost in 2006 is that they stopped being reliable stewards of the public trust.  It is becoming clear, however, that the Democrats who now control Congress are much worse--whereas Republicans screwed up due to their ineptitude, the Democrats are wasting money as a matter of policy.
I don't think you'd get much of an argument from anybody on that one. He continues, giving an excellent example that proves, once again, that no matter how bad the Republicans might have been, the Democrats are worse. Writes Jess,
There are two federal student loans programs (hey, it's the federal government...) The first program, the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), is a public-private partnership between the federal government and various lending institutions. The FFELP was established under President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society initiative.  Despite those origins, however, the FFELP has been a cost effective way for the federal government to help over 50 million students finance their college educations. The FFELP currently finances college loans for eighty percent of American college student.
You might be familiar with it's more common moniker, named for the biggest vendor of such loans, "Sallie-Mae."
The other program--the Federal Direct Loan Program (FDLP)--is run entirely by the government and was established in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. Loans to students under the FDLP come directly out of the treasury and interest payments go directly back in. The idea behind establishing the FDLP was to "cut out the middle man" and save the taxpayers some money.
And like many Clinton initiatives, thanks to its roots in a more socialistic policy, it has become a costly boondoggle, compared to Sallie-Mae, its free-market conterpart. Don't worry though, 'cause the new Congress is going to fix it... Unfortunately, they plan to do so by eliminating the competition. By eliminating the free market portion, that is, which Democrats have never really liked.
.
Click here to read the whole sad story. What's worse, President Bush might join in with the Dems in giving the federal government total control of the college loan industry here in America.
President Bush has proposed $19 billion in cuts to his 2008 education budget. And there is a movement afoot among Democrats in Washington to use those cuts to gut the FFELP. That is to say Democrats in Washington want to commence the dismantling of the student loan program which, of the two, is more efficient, services the most students, and is lightest on the taxpayers.
Do we really want that? I agree with Jess' conclusion:
Members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions need to hear from concerned citizens that the FFELP should be preserved and even strengthened, not dismantled in favor of a government monopoly on college loans.

April 11, 2007

New Media Rising... Part 2

Another new innovation that seems to be taking hold in politcs and campaigning is the so-called "bloggers's conference call." Like a traditional press conference in the "old media" fashion, the speaker usually starts with an opening set of remarks and then participants are allowed to ask questions in turns as directed by the moderator. This is basically another variant of those corporate stockholder conference calls that many people might already be familiar with.
.
Instead of everybody gathered in a room, those involved do so on the phone. This allows a citizen journalist, keyboard at hand, the same access as any of the so-called news reporters one sees on TV or reads in the New York Times world. No matter where they're at. The difference in the questions and reporting, is that the blogger, for which journalism tends to be a labor of love, a passion, comes to the table, in my humble opinin (biased? you bet!) more informed than someone from the old media's central casting warehouse.
.
Earlier this afternoon, I had the pleasure of participating in my third "bloggers conference call" in 2 weeks. Today's, as was my first, was with '08 prez wannabee, Arizona Senator John McCain. Last week, I had the same opportunity and access to Congressman Duncan Hunter. Both men have enlisted able persons to help with their New Media campaigns-- John Hawkins (Hunter) and friend Patrick Hynes (McCain). I am thankful to both for giving the 'Grok the opportunity to join in.
.
Aside from my respect and full appreciation and agreement with his positions on winning the new world war, the other area in which I find common ground with Senator McCain is, in fact, his New Media acknowledgement.
.
McCain greets old & new media & local pols in Franklin, NH
.
When asked what role bloggers would play in the media strategy of a McCain Administration, McCain said
"Bloggers are a vital part of the information technology in America and the world."
He vowed as president to hold detailed briefings for the public, both on C-Span and through the use of such devices like today's "blogger conference call." He seems to absolutely recognize, as I have long held, that President Bush has failed at properly communicating with the American people. It appears he believes that part of the answer is the blogs. Noting that in some cases,
"bloggers need maturing, the blogosphere phenomenon has had a fundamentally profound effect on how America communicates with itself and with the world."
Yeah, I'll buy that...

Another remake of an old story...

The United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states
"whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
The requirement of testimony of two witnesses was inherited from the British Treason Act 1695.
News item: Fresh off her trip to Syria, House speaker Nancy Pelosi might continue her unprecedented usurpation of presidential foreign policy powers and visit one of the three "axis of evil" members under the guise of "diplomacy." From Tuesday's SFGate.com comes the story:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Tom Lantos, D-San Mateo, just back from a trip to Syria that sparked sharp criticism from Republicans and the Bush administration, suggested Tuesday that they may be interested in taking another diplomatic trip - to open a dialogue with Iran.
.
Democrat US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
.
I thought politics ended at the water's edge. I thought the president was the voice for the Nation? When I think of the very real threat of the new world war with Islamo-fascism, I can't help but believe that what Pelosi and her fellow comrades in the Democratic Party, who advocate the defeat of America, are really doing is committing the very act of treason. "Adhering to our enemies?" Giving them "aid and comfort?" Again from the SFGate article. Said Pelosi, on Iran:
Iran's support of terrorist groups is something that must be stopped,'' she said. "Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon is something that must not happen and we must stop them with the strongest of diplomatic measures.''
.
Oooh, she's threatening the STRONGEST of diplomatic measures! I'll bet the Iranians are quaking in their boots. By the way, what kind of wine will be in the glasses you'll toast with the man who says "Israel will be wiped off the map."? Will you bring some from your home state of California, Ms. Pelosi? By the way, did you hear the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he said this a short while back?
"Today, it is the United States, Britain and the Zionist regime which are doomed to disappear as they have moved far away from the teachings of God,"
How goes that saying? "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it"
.

 US Traitor Hanoi Jane Fonda looking through
anti-aircraft gunsights used to shoot down US pilots
.
At the very least, is Pelosi not guilty per the Logan Act?
§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

1 Stat. 613, January 30, 1799, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).
Should Pelosi spend three years in jail? I'd say it's a start. Then we can work on the treason part...

April 10, 2007

Sununu sit in. Antiwar peaceniks joined by pro-troops group.

The innocuous little AP blurb noted
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) -- New Hampshire peace activists are planning a sit-in today at Sen. John Sununu's offices, their sixth in five weeks.
A "sit-in"? Has the age of aquarius returned? Well, not quite. Back in the day, the misguided youth of the sixties, mostly in the colleges, seemingly overran the so-called "establishment" to win the debate, and the government caved. As the popular VH-1 program asks, "Where are they now?" Well, a good many grew up and went on to live fairly normal lives, never to be much heard from again. Some, however, never gave up "the fight." (Almost like a weird twist on the old saw about the Japanese soldier on an island who never got the message that the war is over) Yes, some of the very same children of the sixties, now much older and greyer, occupied a small space in NH Sen. John Sununu's office for a "sit-in." And while they may look like a bunch of silly retreads seeking one last hurrah reminiscent of the "good 'ole days," unfortunately, the government, or, at least the Democratic-led Congress, might once again cave. GraniteGrok was there...
.
Members of NH Peace Action & supporters gathered
in Sen Sununu's Manchester office on Monday.
.
The AP story further noted,
Participants planned to read statements and urge Sununu to support a withdrawal. Organizers also want Sununu to avoid any confrontation with Iran.
Additionally, the group of peaceniks called on Congress to stop ALL funding of the war. As they sat in chairs with Kumbayah type music quietly playing in the backround, performing a group reading of a play dramatizing the warlike nature and rhetoric of some Christian Church service (demonstrating their disdain for all things religion-- actually, only one particular religion) they were suddenly joined by some more folks. Only these people weren't at Sununu's office to join the silly little sit in.
.

No, they were there to show support for our troops. And our country. Support that stays all the way through to victory.

Enter some fine veterans...
.

Representatives from the Combat Veterans Association & VFW Post 8214 arrive at Sununu's Manchester office in support of troops & greet "sit-in" war protesters.
.
And the Blue and Gold Star Moms, or, as we're calling them here at the 'Grok, the "Moms of Fury"...
.
Blue and Gold Star Mothers gather in Sununu's office
Monday in support of the troops and victory
 
That's right. They're mad as heck, and not going to take it anymore! No longer are the antiwar protesters going to rule the day. When they gather in opposition to war, the troops, and America, others will gather in order to show that the moonbats and those wishing defeat for America do NOT speak for all. The event was videotaped, and portions will be YouTubed. Check back for more postings on this event. What a thrill it was to watch ordinary Americans standing for what's right-- no matter how difficult!

McCain on the surge

THE most important to me in this Presidential race is the Global War on Terror.  Actually, this is very much misnamed, now that I have learned more and seen more in the years since that violent attack on September 11, 2001.  Given that, it should be renamed to the Global War on Islamofascism, or the Global War on Radical Islamism, as it is clear that the Islamofascists hate us. 

Why?  Because we do not believe what they want us to.  Islam means submission, and in their eyes, it must be total and without reservation.  When they look at our Western liberal democracies, they see "me" orientedness - not Allah oriented and certainly not a sharia law oriented  environment.  They want nothing else than for us, unbelievers and infidels, to either convert or die.

There are no in-betweens.  There is no space for diplomacy - oh, perhaps for a short time, but only as a hudna - a time to regroup, strengthen, and then carry the battle forward.  And their battle is not just military in nature, nor just terroristic in tactics, but will be waged using our own  laws and traditions as well (re: taxi refusals to seeing eye dogs and unwillingness to scan pork products in stores).  Any way that their agenda can be pushed, to force acceptance of their sharia law, will be used.

Senator McCain is willing to bet large - he is willing to sacrifice his last shot to gain the office of the President on our safety.  While some may believe that his concentration on the War is nothing more than a tactic, I see it differently.  While there are stances of his with which I disagree with, this is NOT one of them.  If it came down to one issue, and one issue only, on this I would vote for Senator McCain - he sees this as being past politics - it is about the safety of our country.  Yes, in a heartbeat, I'd vote for him if this was the only issue.

Mr. Pelley of 60 Minutes, I feel, tried to put a hit piece on McCain and tried to put him in a bad light. My take on his trying to trap Senator McCain can be seen below - a liberal journalist already predisposed against any war, is willing to put the defense of American liberal ideals (the traditional liberties of our society - at risk.

McCain Discusses Iraq Market Visit

Senator John McCain says the House, the Senate and the majority of the American people are all wrong when it comes to Iraq.

Certainly, I believe him about the House and the Senate - they have shown lately that the Democrats in power wish to recreate their Viet Nam hey day once again.  And I agree with what I have seen - if they cut the funding, they will be casting themselves out into the hinterland - history will repeat itself.

I also believe that while most Americans may want us out of Iraq, they want it as Victors first - not retreaters - then leave.

But let me point out - after WINNING WWII, our troops are still in Germany and Japan, 60 years later.  And we are still in Bosnia a decade later having won nothing.  This I blame on Europe for not willing to defend itself or its ideals- lots of words, lots of rhetoric, lack of action.

He set out to prove it last week by walking into the heart of Baghdad. What he said about security after that walk set off front page outrage in the media. Correspondent Scott Pelley and a 60 Minutes team were the only reporters with McCain.

Of course outrage seethed in the media!  It went against their template of "we're losing" and now, on concert with the Dems version of "we cannot win".  And why not be outraged with him?  After all, they lionized him last time around, helped him create and maintain his "maverick" monniker - and then he puts them on notice! He's not playing with them this time - this time, he played them.

McCain is gambling his bid for the White House on success in the war. When Pelley sat down with him in Iraq, he said Americans can't lose their nerve now, just when he thinks there’s reason to hope.
"I believe that we can succeed and I believe the consequences of failure are catastrophic. Those who say 'Just withdraw,' then you say, 'What next?'" Sen. McCain says.
"I wonder at what point do you stop doing what you think is right and you start doing what the majority of the American people want?" Pelley asks.

This last question is the crux of the difference between Liberals (and the media is chock full of them by any and all studies I have ever seen). There is much to be said to be standing on principle, and I give McCain LOTS for doing so, even when it hurts.  Especially when it hurts!

And Pelley gives no indication of WHY the American people have grown tired - fed a constant diet of nothing but bad news and death counts of our Armed Forces.  We are an optimistic people, generally, but after years of nothing but negative, even an optimist would crack.

What makes me believe that what Senator McCain is saying is right is simple - I read the first hand accounts coming from the milblogs and other non-MSM related media outlets - we hear not the stories of courage, of faithfulness, and of putting yourself second behind your mates.  We hear not the stories of "random acts of kindness" and of sacrifice of our service members towards each other - and to the Iraqis.  We don't hear the stories of reconstruction, of improving conditions; all we hear is the media's drone of negativity.

Pelley - you sir, are part of the huge problem that exists - not the solution that you believe yourself to be.


"Well, again, I disagree with what the majority of the American people want. Failure will lead to chaos, withdrawal will lead to chaos," McCain replies.
 
With pressure to withdraw building at home, McCain landed in the midst of the Baghdad surge and did something that would have been unthinkable a few weeks ago.
 
The new commander, Army General David Petraeus, sealed McCain inside the latest armored Humvee, soldiers call it a "Full Up Frag 5," and took McCain on a Sunday drive to the market.

Failure cannot be an option in this war of ideology.  No one has said that this would be short, easy, or cheap.  Yes, years have passed.  Many more will - and the media needs to take the lead of marshalling the American people.  The media itself has this conflated image of itself being the "taker downer of authority " -  shades of ever present Watergate-itis.

Hey guys - don't you watch your own ratings and readership numbers tanking? While you may be pooh-poohing America's status, your's keeps slipping as well.  Trust me, if the Islamofascists win - you will be among the first to lose your privileged status.

Gen. Petraeus wrote the book on the Bush administration’s new strategy. He started eight weeks ago, moving U.S. troops off bases and into neighborhoods to clear and hold the streets. The centerpiece is the al Shorja market. Two months ago it was devastated by a car bomb. Now the Army has banned vehicles and laid on extra security.

Petraeus brought McCain to a rug shop, an ordinary scene, until you step back to see the 22 soldiers outside. Inside, McCain did his own reporting, asking the rug merchant, "In the last two months are things better or worse?"

The merchant said things are better, but, he said, there are snipers in the neighborhood that sometimes paralyze the market.

The tour of the bazaar seemed, well, a little bizarre. The delegation played the role of tourists while surrounded by enormous firepower. The guns, though, couldn’t protect McCain from his own words.

Two months can be a lifetime in politics.  In setting a new direction, initiating a new strategy? Hardly a spit in time.  Yet, there are signs of improvement , and Senator McCain is being held to a fault for looking for some optimism? 

The piece continues, with a recounting of how much force (armored vehicles, armed soldiers, and helicopters) were needed for Senator McCain to take his walk in backing up his earlier words of:

 
And he said this on the radio: "There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today."

And gets taken to task by the piece.  You know, I really do believe that McCain, if allowed, would have strolled around regardless of the display of force protecting him.  Right - what General, in his right mind, is going to let the terrorists have pot shots at one of the most important people in the US?  Again, the media is trying to find dirt in all the wrong places.  McCain does do unscripted stuff (I saw that first hand as the 'Grok team attended one of his NH Town Hall appearances - non-favorable things come to light when anyone can ask anything - but McCain dutifully and honestly answered every question - even if this conservative wasn't thrilled with the answers.  You HAVE to give him kudos for that!).  And when you do that, things are going to be "misspoken" - gee, a fact that the media just lapped up last go around....
 

"I understand why they would provide me with that security but I can tell you if it had been two months ago and I'd asked to do it, they'd a said, 'Under no circumstances whatsoever.' I view that as a sign of progress," McCain tells Pelley.

The fact is, here is Senator McCain is trying to show progress, and the media is having none of it.

"You mentioned in an interview that General Petraeus sometimes goes into Baghdad in an unarmored Humvee, and that there were neighborhoods you can walk though without being concerned for your safety," Pelley asks the senator.

"There is no unarmored Humvee, obviously that’s the case," McCain says. "I’m trying to make the point over and over and over again that we are making progress. There are signs of progress. But it’s long and it’s hard and it’s tough."
 
[snip]
 
He's worried that the market misspeak is distracting from his conviction that the strategy is working after years of mismanagement by the Bush administration.
 
[snip] 
Success of the surge is critical to the campaign. But at home, for the moment, voters aren’t convinced.

I ask one question - other than the durge of the daily American death count, how much news does the media actually give us?  I am convinced that the media is acting as the choke point, intentionally, to be able to shape the news now so that the future news will be what they want.  Reporters of news?  No, they want to shape American public opinion.....no, objective news went out the window years ago.

[snip]

And above all is the McCain mantra that the Republican party has been spending the country into ruin. "We let spending get out of control to a degree where it led to corruption," he says.

How did it happen?

"We lost our way. We began to value power over principle," McCain says.

"It's not the party that you hoped it would be?" Pelley asks,

"Absolutely," McCain says. "Nor is it the party that Ronald Reagan hoped we would be."

This is talk that does my heart good.  I do believe that the Republicans have lost their way - the lure of power did corrupt the party to the detriment of its principles.  Once that happens, bad things can only follow.  And did.

McCain correctly identifies the problem - when power is craved without  relation to principles and fail to carry out what they said they will, those that voted you into power will figure it out. 

And remove you.

"CBS News did a poll in March, and asked people, 'How old do you think the President of the United States should be?' More than half said in his 50s. Would you hazard a guess how many thought the president should be in his 70s?" Pelley asks.
"I don't like this line of questioning at all. I find it offensive. I'm sure that it was a small, it was a small number. But, let me respond to that right away," McCain replies.
"It was zero, Senator," Pelley points out.
"Okay, zero. But, the fact is that it's how you display yourself. I work seven days a week, 12, 14, 16 hours a day. I didn’t see anybody in that town hall that was worried about my age. It’s how you conduct yourself that’s gonna be the key to it," McCain says.
At 70, he works even on the way to the barber. He seems inexhaustible. If McCain is stiff, it's from the crippling injuries he suffered after he was shot down and then tortured in North Vietnam in 1967. There has been no return of the skin cancer that he battled seven years ago, but it left him with long scars which he covers with a joke.

Sorry, while age has to be considered, this is a "sandbag job", gotcha journalism.  I believe that no one could be found that can refute the notion that McCain is a workaholic.  While his age might be up there, look around at our senior citizens - alive longer, but also functioning better as well.  Go ahead, compare his outlook and demeanor to almost anyone else.

In his office, American history is a family portrait, five generations at West Point or Annapolis. Relatives include generals and admirals.
"This is my father in Vietnam when he was commander-in-chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific," McCain says, pointing out a photo.
And now McCain’s family is serving again. He has a son in the Naval Academy and another son, 18 years old, headed to Iraq.
His son Jimmy volunteered to serve. Why?
"'Cause he's a fine, patriotic American," McCain says.
Asked if he tried to talk his son out of it, the senator says, "No. But I really don't talk about him or my other son very much. I think my son is no different than the thousands and thousands of other sons and daughters who decide they wanna serve their country. And I'm not sure it's much more complicated than that."

Very telling, this line of questioning.  WHY would Senator McCain WANT to talk his son out of volunteering? McCain himself IS a war hero - he served his country willingly, was captured and spent years as a POW - he deserves our thanks and our gratitude.  Given all that, why does this journalist even think of asking such a thing? 

This shows the utter cluelessness of some journalists - so I'll go off on another rant - yes, there are those that are willing to volunteer for low pay, hard times, and dangerous work.  Why?  

Simple - they love this country and want to defend her.  It may be more than that and Lord knows there can be lots of reasons, but it can be just that - a feeling of a duty to this country to keep it and its citizens safe.  'Nough said. 

My son served in the Marines - and not coming from a military family or background, I was thrilled and proud.  I see it as an honorable profession and calling - and we are far from being a poor and uneducated family.

 

[snip]
60 Minutes flew with McCain to Anbar province, the heart of the Sunni insurgency. On a U.S. base there he met with a Sunni sheikh whose father and two brothers were killed by al Qaeda. The sheikh told McCain that his tribe and others are now joining the U.S.
"Whoever points a gun at any American soldier, it’s like he points a gun at our families, at our military, and it’s the same thing," the sheik said.
To McCain it was a sign of progress, but he understands there’s still a war to fight. Over the two days of his visit, eight Americans were killed in action.
"Senator, are you betting your candidacy that the surge strategy is going to work?" Pelley asks.
"Oh, I think that may be the case. But I don't worry about it or think about it," McCain says. "There's too many young people who have sacrificed too much for our country and their sacrifice is far more important than any than any ambitions of mine. And I've said a few times I'd rather lose a campaign than lose a war."

A man of convictions - and on this, he gets my support. 

Right Wing "Temperature Check"

Once again, our buddy John Hawkins of RightWingNews and the Conservative Grapevine has taken the temperature of the right side of the Blogosphere (or, the "Rightosphere", as John calls it). These were the questions:
1) If Scooter Libby loses his appeal and goes to jail, do you think George Bush, before he leaves office, should pardon him?
.
2) Should George Bush ask Alberto Gonzales to resign?
.
3) **Original question about British hostages taken by the Iranians has been omitted due to their release. It asked whether the US should take military action to help the Brits.**
.
4) If the only way to stop the Iranians from acquiring nuclear missiles was through air strikes, would you support that course of action or do you think we should allow the Iranians to get nuclear weapons instead?
Air strikes?
Let them get nukes?
5) Which side do you believe is more responsible for the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians?
Israelis?
Palestinians?
6) Do you believe the theory of evolution is correct?
.
7) Would you support an immigration bill that allowed illegal aliens to become American citizens?
.
8) Do you think abortion should either be banned or alternately banned with exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother?
.
Click here to read the results of this latest poll of right of center bloggers. Other than question #6, I ended up voting the same as the majority in every question. What are YOUR answers to this poll? Feel free to leave a comment below. John will be joining us this Saturday on our radio program, Meet the New Press, to discuss the results.

April 9, 2007

Well, actually, I used to step on bugs, sometimes.

Again, I hate to constantly crank on Mitt, but really, does it ever stop? How will thiis stuff play in the general election? I'm starting to think the Botox actually worked for John Kerry...
.

Before:

After:

The Evidence:

April 9th- An anniversary we musn't forget about.

Today is the third anniversary of the capture of SSG. Matt Maupin.
.
Writes NH Blue Star Mother Sue Peterson:
To my friends...
 .
Following is a link that I would like you to visit.  It is the link to Matt's parents' web site www.yellowribbonsupportcenter.com.

I had remembered slightly about a soldier that was captured and either a POW/MIA.  This information was stored way in the back of my mind...I am sorry to say.   After becoming a Blue Star Mom, I went to the National BSM's website and clicked on POW/MIA and read about the numbers that are still missing.  I went to the parents' website and was moved to tears to think that as a Mom I could "forget" a son that was a POW/MIA.  I emailed Keith, the father of Matt, and told him I was sorry and that I would never forget Matt or the others.  Keith told me about Bob Jones, Laconia, (NH) that has a vigil for the POW/MIA's every Thursday (no matter the weather).  So, my friendship with Bob began.  This gives you a little background on how I came to know more about Matt and the others.
.
The purpose of this email is to ask that you please send his parents a note to that says you will not forget Matt - it will be 3 years ago on Monday, 4-9-07 - that they had no more contact with their son.  (He was captured on 4-9-04).  Those of us that are parents, we never give up hope and as a Mom of a soldier serving in Iraq, I cannot even imagine being a parent of one of these men...again, please do not forget them - UNTIL THEY ALL COME HOME....we need to help the families of these soldiers.
.
I pray that your message to his parents will bless them and let them know that they are not alone and that, here in New Hampshire, Matt will not be forgotten.
.
God bless you all...please feel free to pass this on to others...thank you.

Susan
1DC

"Should we feel at times disheartened and discouraged, a simple movement of the heart toward God will renew our powers.  Whatever He may demand of us, He will give us at the moment the strength and courage that we need".   

CONCORD MONITOR CALLS NH NATIVES DUMB

Yesterday, Pravda on the Merrimack ran an editorial arguing that the out-of-control Democrats in Concord are simply "doing what voters sent them to do."  Funny, all I remember by way of a platform was "Bush lied, people died."  Apparently, there were a few "Bush lied, pass a seat belt law" and "Bush lied, civil unions" thrown in for good measure.  Pravda on the Merrimack couldn't resist taking their usual elitist cheap shot at those who don't share their dream of turning New Hampshire into Cuba of the North:

"Today, only one-third of New Hampshire's residents are natives. In one generation, the state has gone from the middle of the pack nationally in average education level and per-capita income to eighth and seventh, respectively - near the top of the heap - thanks to the influx of better-educated flatlanders. But the newcomers also were more likely to vote Democratic."

But hasn't the Monitor always said that only dummies oppose income taxes.  So wouldn't that make the folks moving here from states with income taxes the dummies? 

Action Alert! NH's way of life is under attack (again).

First it was the repeal of parental notification prior to a minor getting an abortion. Then mandatory seat belts. Lake speed limits (a "test trial"). Fee hikes. And a denouncement of the war (a non-binding, meaningless gesture). Oh, and a fine for "polluting" if you allow a balloon to float away from your or your child's hand. (I guess I know what we WON'T be seeing at the Nascar races in NH this yaer) Yesiree, when you look at what's been happening to our beloved Granite State (motto: "Live Free or Die") since the Dems were swept into power in the last election, it's enough to make you want to cry.
.
The above list of NH House-passed items is bad enough. But the latest move by our elected "leaders" is the hardest one of them all to swallow-- the passage of a bill allowing same-sex civil unions. To watch as my adopted state has joined a handful of other states including New Jersey and Vermont in sanctioning such relationships has been maddening indeed. Did the voters know what they bargained for when we threw out one set of bums and exchanged them for a new set of bums? Was this a burning issue during the campaign season? I don't happen to recall any such talk. Yet, here we are. It goes to show that party labels still DO mean something.
.
The most amazing thing about this latest attack on NH's traditional way of life is the speed at which it's been fast tracked through the legislative process, which according to one wag who knows of such things, is the quickest he's ever seen. The thing sailed through the House and is already scheduled to come to the Senate within the next few weeks, and a Senate committee hearing, with almost no notice, has been scheduled for tomorrow. Hmmm- I wonder why this was done over the Easter holiday weekend? With all the festivities, people might not pay much attention and miss what's happening. You don't think this was done on purpose, do you?
.
I received the following in an email. It details what those who wish to preserve NH as we know it can do...
The liberal Republicans, Democrats and homosexuals are pushing through same sex civil unions which, once the N.H. Supreme Court gets a hold of it, will turn into same sex marriage because this is exactly what it is anyway. The liberal Republicans have decided to fast track this legislation by bringing it before the Senate Judiciary Committee at

1:15 PM on Tuesday, 10 April 2007.

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing will be held inside Representative Hall in the Capital building. It is quite evident that the Liberal Republicans, Democrats and the homosexuals are fast tracking this piece of ungodly legislation during the most important holiday weekend to Christians there is, Easter Sunday for two reasons:
One reason being, hoping we are so pre-occupied with our celebration of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ that we never actually know, and the second being such sort notice, we would not be able to show up to either sign the blue sheets or testify in opposition of this piece of sick legislation.

I'm absolutely sure that the homosexual side of this issue has been extremely well notified and will be there in an attempt to out number those of us who oppose this pathetic legislation. This is the typical and underhanded action of the devil himself.

I understand that this is short notice. This was exactly the reason for the enemy's plan. The Senate is close in Republicans vs. Democrats and all we have to do is turn a Democrat or two and the legislation that passed last Wednesday, will die a fast death in the Senate committee and never get to the Governor's desk for him to sign or veto. The Senate is a lot wiser then this runaway renegade NH House of Representatives and we have an excellent opportunity to end this once and for all.
.
What I need is for as many people as possible to show up Tuesday afternoon in force. We need to dwarf the homosexuals who plan to make it look like there are more of them then there are off us and we all know this is not true. The Senate committee got concerned when 500 gun owners showed up to oppose SB44 and killed the bill on a 4 to 2 vote finding it ITL. The NH Senate seems to have a better track record in regard to listening to the people, so lets let them in the Judiciary committee hear us loud and extremely clear. If you can't make it then email as many people as you can and encourage them to make it. We must outnumber the homosexuals.
.
We stand and fight here! I've emailed over 230 households as to our upcoming battle. If each one of you emails 50 people and only half show up, we will have 5,750 people at the committee hearing on Tuesday.
And now readers of the 'Grok know as well.

April 8, 2007

Happy Easter from the 'Grok!

He died for our sins.
On the third day, He rose from the dead.
Then he ascended to Heaven.
It is up to all of us to choose whether we want to follow Him or not.
Choose well.
.
He has arisen!
He has truly risen...

No fury like a mother scorned-- The Movie

In this prior post, I reported on the Friday visit paid NH's 2nd Congressional District representative, Democrat Paul Hodes, by a group of relatives, friends, family members, veterans, and supporters of our military. The purpose of the appointment was to express outrage and dismay with the congressman's vote for the recent pork-laden military appropriation bill containing a specific deadline for troop  withdrawal from Iraq.
.
Certain media covering the event have chosen to focus on the sometimes elevated passion and emotion that this group of close-knit military supporters brought to the meeting, missing the overall message expressed by the group of desiring a united country supporting the troops and the mission to the end-- an end that finishes with victory. When a group of mothers and fathers, veterans, supporters, and patriots feel that the ones they care about, and the country they love, is being threatened you can't blame them for being concerned. When the threat comes from the political motives and machinations of politicians, with little regard to doing what's right, you can understand why concern turns to anger.
.
What follows below is a nine minute video that rather nicely captures the essence of the meeting. If only more Americans felt as these people do, we might actually win the war. A democratic nation cannot sustain a war without the support of the people. Watch the video. Take a stand like these people have. How did YOUR congressman vote? Does he/she fully support the troops to victory? If not, give him/her an earful like the "Moms of Fury" and their friends did this past Friday. Who knows, maybe some of them will see the light...

April 7, 2007

Meet the New Press-- New Time! 11 AM

If you are in central New Hampshire this morning from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM (note the new time), please tune in to WEMJ 1490 on your AM dial and listen to “Meet the New Press.”

This week we will be talking to Dan Gilgoff, author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War. Mr. Gilgoff is also the reporter who broke the Dobson-says-Thompson-isn’t-a-Christian story.

We’ll also chat it up with State Rep. Maureen Mooney about the civil unions bill that passed the New Hampshire House of Representatives this week.

And we’ll talk to Meredith Selectman Bob Flanders about his recent piece in the Laconia Citizen newspaper and in the Laconia Daily Sun, which is unavailable online.

Please visit the download page the hear the show via podcast if you are not within the broadcast area. We hope to have the livestreaming ready within a week or two.

"Moms of Fury" give Hodes and Democratic Congress an earful.

The group gathers in Rep Hodes' Concord office on Friday
.
New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District representative Paul Hodes was taken to the proverbial woodshed Friday afternoon in his Concord office. A group of a dozen or so Granite Staters-- many of the same so-called "Moms" we've covered here at the 'Grok in prior postings (here, here, and here), the Blue and Gold Star Mothers of NH, military families, proud veterans, the Pease Greeters, and other friends and supporters-- met with Congressman Hodes late on Friday to make known to him their displeasure with his recent vote on the war funding appropriations bill passed by the Democratic-controlled Congress.
.
There was no doubt that the group, meeting for a scheduled appointment with Hodes, fully supports the troops and wants them supported by Congress... all the way through to victory. Many of those gathered have close relatives past and present in the military. Despite his pleadings to the contrary, the Congressman was accused of a lack of concern and caring for the troops. The group demanded he give the mission the money it needs, without a timeline. He pretty much stood his ground, issuing the standard Democrat party talking point about the war-- "I support the troops and only want them to be safe..." etc, including this:
Congressman Hodes explains his vote to the group.
"My concern is our very presense tends to fuel, in general, the global extremist movement."
Allison Scammon of the Pease Greeters, also with a sister in active duty over in Iraq and other relatives retired from the service told Congressman Hodes what she thought of his and his fellow majority members' votes:
"If this Congress was sitting during World War II, we would be having this discussion in German right now!"
Ouch! The group didn't pull any punches. And they didn't have much use for any of his explanations which pretty much followed the usual Democrat line we've been hearing from Pelosi, Murtha, and the rest of the cut and run crowd. They weren't buying any of it.
.
I will be putting several more posts up regarding this event. The patriotism and level of energy and enthusiasm for the troops, the mission, and our country exuded by the "Moms" & co. is certainly worthy of sharing with as many people as possible. If more of this were to catch on, there's no telling what America might be able to accomplish. Like the members of the US Armed Forces, they are doing our Nation, and our children and their children a great service.

April 6, 2007

OVER THE TOP FOR AN INCOME TAX

Yesterday, the Concord Monitor ran an editorial pushing the Lynch amendment titled, “Long knives out too soon on Lynch plan.”  The night of the long knives commonly refers to Adolf Hitler’s bloody purge of potential rivals in 1934.  This allusion is over the top, even for the Monitor.  Take a deep breath, Monitor.  Opposing the Lynch amendment is not the moral equivalent of National Socialism. 

In the editorial, the Monitor commends former Congressman and Supreme Court Justice Chuck Douglas for “statesmanlike reasoning” for getting on the Lynch bandwagon.  According to the Monitor, “Douglas has one primary concern: ensuring that the state's education policy is created by the legislative and executive branches, not by the courts.”  If that is Chuck’s primary concern, then he should be passionately opposing the Lynch amendment because it does just the opposite.  It mandates that the Legislature use an antiquated, discredited policy approach to public education developed by lawyers and judges – a statewide definition of an adequate education and some formulaic determination of funding based on the definition.

The Claremont litigation is not unique.  Efforts to set education policy by litigation, rather than through legislation, began in the late 1960s.  Adequacy suits have been around since the late 1980s.  Indeed, we are often told by those shilling Claremont that we should define an adequate education the same way state X has or that we should determine the cost the same way state Y has.  If adequacy is such great policy, then why are our students falling further and further behind students from other countries?

The Monitor editorial chastises me for citing the Monitor’s support of the Lynch amendment as evidence that it is a Trojan Horse for an income tax.  According to the Monitor, “Not that Mosca will buy it, but he's incorrect.  The amendment would neither require nor preclude a change in the state's tax structure.”  The Monitor is being disingenuous. 

Nobody is arguing that language has been planted in the amendment that requires public education to be funded with an income tax immediately.  Rather, the amendment greases the skids for an income tax.  Here’s how.  While the State only has to pay for 50 percent of the cost of an adequate education, it still has to “maintain standards of accountability,” which obviously means making sure that the other 50 percent gets paid for.  School districts that lose the bulk of the Claremont money they have been receiving will be required to raise local property taxes to make up the difference.  Can’t you already hear the Monitor railing against the inequity of this funding scheme?      

The Legislature will materially raise the cost of an adequate education every year, or the Court will do it for them, which will drive local property taxes in towns not receiving targeted aid through the roof.  The only relief will be to pass an income tax, because the Lynch amendment prevents municipalities from spending or taxing less than Concord tells them to.  Can’t you already see the Monitor grinning?

The Monitor’s keep-the Democrats-in-power-and-spend-our-way-to-an-income-tax approach doesn’t sit well with Andru Volinsky.  In an op-ed written in response to the “long knives” editorial, Volinsky lists various reasons why state taxes should pay for all of the cost of an adequate education.  This list can be reduced to three words: income tax now. 

While the Monitor and Volinsky differ about how best to achieve an income tax, they are on the same page when it comes to misrepresenting the role of the judiciary under our system of government.  Consider this gem from Volinsky’s op-ed:  “The problem with the current state of education funding is not that the Supreme Court has dictated policy but that, faced with a direct order that the Legislature and governors must define a constitutionally adequate education, four governors and their legislatures have refused to do so.”

You’ve got to be kidding!  If directly ordering the Legislature and Governor to define an adequate education is not dictating policy, then what is?  It is instructive to compare Volinsky’s views on the judiciary’s role regarding public education with that of the pre-Claremont Supreme Court:  “Any educational policy or rule declared by the Legislature or promulgated under authority delegated by it may not be reversed or vacated judicially on the ground that it must be regarded as impolitic.”

Volinsky correctly says that the Monitor shouldn’t attempt “to discourage vigorous debate by belittling opinions with which it disagrees.”  That debate should not just include, but should be all about, the legitimacy of the Claremont decisions.

There's something about Mitt...

Because I've got friends and aquaintances either working for or supporting in some way nearly every presidential candidate in the race on the Republican side, I'm trying desperately to remain open-minded about each one. Out of respect and courtesy, I have decided to give every candidate the benefit of the doubt (well, maybe not Hagel) and not totally written off anybody at this point. That being said, this attitude is easier to maintain with some candidates than others. 
.
Consider Mitt Romney. Try as I may, I just can't get enthusiasm going for him. While I know several good conservatives that are in his camp, and some of the contributors to my favorite magazine (National Review) are too, he holds no appeal for me. While I know he's been talking a good game on many conservative themes and issues, I just feel uneasy about the Romney candidacy.
.
For starters, he just strikes me wrong every time I see him. He comes off as too smooth and too cool, in a way that just appears contrived. Some might call it confidence, but there's confident and then there's cockiness. Beyond that, with all of the videotaped and otherwise well-documented evidence showing radically different positions taken by Romney through the years, it makes it easy for the moniker "flip-flopper" to stick. While I can appreciate a "road to Damascus" moment, such change can be problematic in the hands of the opposition in the general election.
.
Especially hard for me is the now-famous YouTube video of Mitt during the 1994 Senate campaign, in which he vehemently denies Reagan years, vowing never to support a return to those days.
.
.
BOSTON --To hear Mitt Romney talk on the campaign trail, you might think the Republican presidential candidate had a gun rack in the back of his pickup truck.

"I purchased a gun when I was a young man. I've been a hunter pretty much all my life," he said this week in Keene, N.H., to a man sporting a National Rifle Association cap.

Yet the former Massachusetts governor's hunting experience is limited to two trips at the bookends of his 60 years: as a 15-year-old, when he hunted rabbits with his cousins on a ranch in Idaho, and last year, when he shot quail on a fenced game preserve in Georgia.
.
Last year's trip was an outing with major donors to the Republican Governors Association, which Romney headed at the time.
.
An aide said Wednesday that Romney was not trying to mislead anyone, although he confirmed Romney had been hunting only on those occasions in his life.
.
"Gov. Romney's support for the Second Amendment doesn't come from the fact he knows how to handle a firearm; it comes from his appreciation of the Constitution and the rights enshrined in it, including the right to keep and bear arms," said campaign spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom.
Then why didn't Romney simply say so? How can he make such easily fact-checked incorrect or misleading statements and think he can get away with it? Shouldn't he know better? Or is it that his desire to pander to particular voters wins the race against truth in any given situation? I want to beat the Democrats in '08. Our Nation's survival depends on it. We can't be messing around with someone who might fall apart in the general election campaign.
.
(Prior post about Mitt & guns here.)

Friday humor. Which one's the good thief?

It's Good Friday. Respecting the day, that on which our Lord and Savior died for our sins, while recognizing our readers have come to expect something to bring laughter to the end of their work week, we offer the following:
The old priest lay dying in the hospital.  For years he faithfully served churchgoers in the nation’s capital.  He motioned for his nurse to come near.  “Yes, Father?” asked the nurse.  “I would really like to see Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi before I die,” whispered the priest.  The nurse sent the request to Congress and Senator Kennedy and Speaker Pelosi rushed to the hospital, certain attending would help their images.  When they arrived, the old priest took Kennedy’s hand in one hand and Pelosi’s in the other.  A look of serenity and acceptance came over the old priest’s face.  Finally Senator Kennedy spoke: “Father, of all the people you could have chosen, why did you choose to be with us as you near the end?”  The priest slowly replied, “I have always tried to pattern my life after our Lord and Savior.”  “Amen!” replied Kennedy and Pelosi.  The priest continued: “He died between two lying thieves and I would like to do the same.”
(Hat tip: DD)

Stop the presses!

Blue moon? Check.
.
"Is that pig poop on your car?" Yeah-- damn things. Ever since they started to fly, I'm wallowing in it... Flying pigs. Check.
.
Hey did you catch the weather on "GlobalWarming Induced Storm Panic Center" on News TV 99 this morning? Can you imagine? 27 degrees in Hell! It figures. The SUV my wife drives made the CO2 stuff that made the earth warm that makes the weather crazy, and now hell freezes over. What's next?

Who knows-- maybe NH's Governor Lynch, ("Governor Do Nothing", as I like to call him) will actually make a decision!

"No way!" Well, it might be the time of pigs flying under a blue moon over frozen hell because NH's loveable governor has, according to Thursday's Union Leader, expressed
reservations about [the NH House-passed civil union] bill to give formal rights to homosexual couples.
Can you believe it? Well, slow down, because, as you might have guessed, he hasn't quite made up his mind yet. (Translation: found  a politically safe loophole or other expedient way to avoid getting pinned down). Again, from Thursday's Union Leader, says Lynch:
"I think it's more complicated than some may think, in terms of what the impact is on many other statutes..."
Says the UL piece
Lynch said he has not yet had an in-depth discussion with lawmakers. "I will weigh in on the bill once I make up my mind on it."
False alarm. It sounds like he hasn't made a decision. Come on Governor. You can do better than that. How about, if nothing else helps, sticking your spit-moistened finger to the wind. Isn't that what you usually do?
  

April 5, 2007

Moms on a mission...

Regular readers of the 'Grok know that we support the troops, their families, and the mission-- support that extends right through to the end with victory. Here in New Hampshire, I have had the honor to get to know a wonderful little merry band of ladies- including Blue & Gold Star Mothers and their friends-- that are doing the Lord's work in keeping a level of positive backing and energy here on the homefront. This group is the one that staged a rally in Concord, NH during a late-winter blizzard to stand in solidarity with the Gathering of Eagles event in Washington DC, vowing to counteract planned antiwar gatherings in both locales.
.
.
You might recall that the NH peaceniks cancelled and reconvened a week later, with brainwashed high school students lining up shoes in memory of the dead in Iraq-- not those murdered by Saddam, mind you, but those who have died since the US attacked Iraq....
.
.
History tells us that popular support within the general citizenry is vital in order for democratic nations to win wars. It is my opinion that my newfound friends are carrying the torch of patriotism and loyalty in this regard, and for that, we should all be thankful.
.
The "Moms of Fury", as I'm thinking they should be called, have a new mission, and everyone's invited...
.
At 4:30PM, Friday April 6th, the "Moms" have an appointment with NH Congressman Paul Hodes at his office at 114 Main Street in Concord, NH. The genesis of this event came after the Democrats' ourageous military supplemental bill containing a withdrawal date and laden with pork. The purpose is best summed up by this email that started the ball rolling:
We need to let him know how we feel about his latest vote....and now the Dems want to completely take the funds from our soldiers.  I am so outraged that they compare [my son] and the other soldiers serving to peanuts, fish, and spinach in the first vote and now that the President Bush wants to veto because of giving our enemies a time table, Harry Reid and the others are threatening to cut all funds to the soldiers.
Let's all join the Moms Friday afternoon and give Rep. Hodes a clue.
.
(Click here to hear the podcast of the Moms from their Meet the New Press radio program appearance this past Saturday.)

A conservative case for Rudy

Being the lone blogger in attendance at Monday evening’s Rudy Giuliani house party was a treat, indeed. As citizen journalists representing GraniteGrok, my wife and I were granted complete access right along side Tiffany Eddy and the WMUR NewsNine crew, NECN, Fox News Channel, and other major media. That speaks volumes to the level of respect and importance the major campaigns are starting to assign the New Media. Prior to the start and during the event, I had the added treat of meeting Rich Lowry of National Review (the only magazine I subscribe to) and NROnline. Watching him check out GraniteGrok on his Blackberry was pretty exciting.
.
As I noted in a previous post, the house party had the air of a rock show. And why not? It sure seems as though Rudy has become the apparent Republican “rock star” of the moment. The crowd was somewhat more energetic than what I have grown accustomed to in local GOP circles.
.
The most immediate first impression of Rudy, the man, is that he exudes a vibrant air of confidence. Not in the cocky sense, but in a way that comes from a history of success and accomplishment combined with a lack of fear of the unknown. He is comfortable with speaking and fielded unscripted questions from those in attendance and from the media with apparent ease.

“Yeah, so what, Doug. This is all good, but not one bit of what you’ve said is about anything of substance.”

True—but if you believe, as I do, that one of the biggest problems for our Nation today is a lack of leadership ability on the part of President Bush, then all of the above is, in fact, very important. As I commented to Rich Lowry during the event, politics in the modern era (and probably every other one too, now that I think about it) is as much perception as it is substance. One must seem to be presidential, in order to be president. The issues? Of course they’re important, but they aren’t the primary consideration of many voters. How else can one explain a Barack Obama?
.
The good thing about Rudy Giuliani is that he happens to be good on a great many issues. Let me explain…
Rudy
Rudy offered 3 main thrusts for the war in Iraq: Clear, hold, and build. This is the new strategy being implemented by the military as supported by President Bush. He believes that we must catch Bin Laden. He too, would veto the military appropriations bill passed by the Democrats. He believes a larger overall force is need, but with no draft. Several reporters pressed him on the draft issue. One thing I really picked up on was his characterization of the enemy, naming them by name:
"There are people in this Islamic extremist terrorist movement... however you want to describe it-- but you've got to describe it honestly."
And he nails the very nature of the threat:
"If you don't face your problems honestly, it's very dangerous in a world in which there are people who want to come here and kill you."
Rudy
For me, no other issue trumps that of the war, which is, as I've often said, a new world war. Rudy sums up the current situation and the absurdity of the Democrats' current strategem:
"We're not at war because we want to be, America is not a warlike country. We're people that want peace...
.
But when people want to come here and kill us, we have to be on offense."
As for the Democrats and their timetable and final date of withdrawal, the Mayor correctly says
"I've never heard in the history of war, announcing to your enemy and handing them a schedule of your retreat."
Obviously he hit other themes and points as well. He started his speech calling ours the greatest Nation in the world with the greatest people.
"If we can't solve our problems, then there's something wrong with us. There isn't anything wrong with us. We''re a very strong people. Talented people."
It was good to hear a leader speak in such a positive way about Americans. He really struck me as quite Reaganesque in his optimism. Again- this may not quite be a substantive measure, but nevertheless, it is an important quality for an American president to possess. Who needs a Hillary crabbin' at us or AlGore and his constant stream of gloom and doom?
.
After praising New Hampshire for its lack of broad-based taxes, which he called the reason for our robust economy, he discussed his record of tax-cutting in NYC and the resultant RISE of tax receipts that followed. Supply-side economics? It sure sounded like it to me. He calls himself the

"strongest fiscal conservative in the race that has practiced it more than the rest."

He then sang my song on taxes, believing the government should cut them to

"put money back in your pockets because you'll spend it in a much smarter way than the Federal government will."

Hear! Hear! With Steve Forbes on the team, this is an area where Hizzoner is going to be tough to beat.
.
He spoke at some length about healthhcare, noting
"We have the best health care in the world----- with problems. Let's fix the problems, not ruin the system."
By "ruin" he meant the implementation of a universal, or governement-controlled system. Refering to the socialistic systems of the European and Canadien model, he reminded those in attendence that people clamor to come to US hospitals from all over the world. The opposite is not true- nobody really desires the care offered in such places like Germany or France. His answer: more competion and market-based initiatives. The bottom line, said Mr. Giuliani:
"More CHOICE."
And, he said, that's
"also the answer to education: More choice."
Charter schools, and empowered parents with the right and ability to choose the schools their children will attend. Rudy was able to implement such ideas and notions while Mayor of New York City... all with a hostile legislative body. Perhaps he's the guy that can finally get it done at the Federal level.
.
The other main point repeated several times throughout the event was his desire and ability to make government work. He acknowledged the post-Katrina fiasco and pledged to fix what's broken, much like he did when assuming office as Mayor and then in the aftermath of September 11th. Additionally, he promised thourough reviews and accounting within the government to identify and control wasteful spending.
.
Optimism. Defense with a strong offense. Low taxes. Personal empowerment and choice. The ability to communicate. Are these not all the very qualities embodied by Ronald Reagan, the greatest conservative president in our lifetime? Could Rudy Giuliani be the one to finally come close to filling the Gipper's huge shoes? Can he garner enough votes to beat whoever the Democrats end up picking as their candidate? I'm starting to believe he can...
.
I'm still not ready to settle on a final pick for the Republican nomination at this stage of the race, but if I were voting today, I just might go with Rudy.
.

April 4, 2007

The wholesale dismemberment of the Granite State continues apace...

House  Republican Office
Press Release 
April 3, 2007 

Democrats Pass Discriminatory Civil Union Legislation

Amendment to Include all Combinations of Family Relationships Rejected

Concord —Negative fallout from the November ’06 elections continues to be felt at the State House in Concord .  During a session that has already witnessed innumerable tax and fee increases passed on to the taxpayers of the state, the democratically controlled New Hampshire House today passed legislation permitting same gender couples to enter spousal unions with the same rights, responsibilities, and obligations as married couples.
.
“It is ironic that a segment of our population that has constantly complained of discrimination is now promoting legislation that is not only discriminatory but unconstitutional,” said Rep. Maureen Mooney (R-Merrimack).  “It is also disingenuous to claim that this bill creates equality when in fact it discriminates against a portion of our society that has been advocating for benefits,” she added.
.
Mooney, along with Rep. Jim MacKay (R-Concord) had attempted to salvage the bill by offering an amendment that would have opened up a civil union to all unmarried couples but it was rejected overwhelmingly by the Democrats.  “It would have made New Hampshire a leader in family law, but instead we have turned our backs to fairness and equality,” added Mooney.
.
In passing HB 437, the Democrats turned down the opportunity to take the lead on providing for all combinations of family relationships in a fair and equal piece of public policy, regardless of gender.
.
“For years members of a community have complained about being discriminated against, and now they are part of an extremely discriminatory measure,” said Republican Policy Leader Gene Chandler (R-Bartlett). “The Democrats now want to give rights to couples of the same sex that will be unavailable to heterosexual couples,” he added.
.
Since the federal government does not recognize civil unions, benefits such as social security death benefits, among others, will not be available to couples in a civil union.
Of course, looking at the vote totals, the Democrats were obviously aided and abetted by a fair number of so-called Republicans...

A warning for NH...

Our friend BDP at AnkleBitingPundits weighs in with another great piece on failing public employee pension funds. This time it's New Jersey:
I know that many of your eyes glaze over when I talk about the coming financial disaster due to the bill coming due for public employee pensions. But the fact is that it’s going to directly affect nearly all of you in the coming years - and not in a good way.  So look away at your peril
.
There is an absolutely jaw-dropping story in today’s New York Times about how the New Jersey teacher’s pension fund is basically bankrupt. Why? Well for one reason because the government was permitted not to donate a single dime to the fund in 2005 when it was already underfunded by billions.  And what’s worse - they initially reported having contributed over $550 million to the fund.
.
And you should read the story for no other reason to see just how politicians from both parties brazenly and willfully changed the rules to get their way, even knowing the consequences of their actions.  It’s a story of arrogance at its finest.
Why is this meaningful to us here in New Hampshire? Because, as you might recall, our state's pension fund is facing serious shortfalls in six or so years. This New Jersey story could very well become a harbinger of things to come for us. BDP also notes this. Notice that the state faces this problem even with that which many current NH pols secret covet: income taxes.
Of course the real losers here are the taxpayers, because they’re the ones that are going to get stuck paying for this. New Jersey already has the highest property taxes in the country, and has one of the highest income tax burdens, and the only way the politicians are going to get the money is to increase that burden.
Click here to read the entire post. All NH citizens must demand a fix to our failing system NOW. I don't like New Jersey. I like NH. Let's try to keep it that way. Check out more from BDP on this subject here, here, and here.

Did you hear the good news from Iraq? I didn't think so.

Whether a McCain supporter or not, one has to admit the guy is doing yeoman's work in his support of the notion of achieving success in the Iraqi front of the war. As I noted in this prior post about McCain and others being heckled by a CNN "reporter," he is in Iraq for a first hand look at how the latest strategy, the so-called "surge" is working. Yesterday I participated in another "bloggers' conference call that featured members of McCain's staff giving an update on what Senators McCain and Graham have found out on their trip.
.
After the mainstream media focused on the fact that the visiting Americans needed security to visit a Baghdad market, the speakers in the conference, Mark Salter, Randy Scheunemann, and Dan McKivergan, sought to tell the rest of the story. Here's the gist:
The surge appears to be working. In Anbar province, McCain reports through his advisors, 16 of the 24 Sunni tribes are working directly with us to fight Al Quada.
Yes there are car bombs. This tells us that a war is going on. Nobody said there wasn't one. What is happening now is that due to our actions, the insurgents have been pushed out of Baghdad proper into the outlying areas. The thought is that they will be easier dealt with beyond the city area. While this by no means indicates an end to the war, or victory, it is a step in the right direction.
A direction that the McCain guys were adamant to point out that has been ignored and overlooked by the media.
The newsmedia is dedicated only to bad news. They report the individual tactical stories, but are neglecting the overall strategic picture-- one that shows a fundamental shift from what was occuring before this new phase.
I asked during the call if Senator McCain had any comment on the heckling he took from the CNN reporter Mike Ware. Apparently he chose to just ignore the guy altogether and it was noted that Mr. Ware never bothered to participate in any real way, like asking a question.
.
I appreciated the opportunity to participate and beyond that am pleased that several of the major Republican presidential wannabees have chosen to include the bloggers in their media outreach. Congressman Mike Pence is travelling with McCain as well. He has a great blog where he details more of the trip. Click here to check it out.

April 3, 2007

A Rolling Stone gathers no moss. How about a stoned Stone?

If he was from Peru, he would've been a Peruvian flake. But he's not. He's from the UK, and well, he's still a flake. Reports today's Boston Herald,
Keith Richards has acknowledged consuming a raft of illegal substances in his time, but this may top them all.
.
In comments published Tuesday, the 63-year-old Rolling Stones guitarist said he had snorted his father’s ashes mixed with cocaine.
.
”The strangest thing I’ve tried to snort? My father. I snorted my father,” Richards was quoted as saying by British music magazine NME. ”He was cremated and I couldn’t resist grinding him up with a little bit of blow. My dad wouldn’t have cared,” he said. ”... It went down pretty well, and I’m still alive.”
 .
Richards’ father, Bert, died in 2002, at 84.

 

Rudy rocks NH...

Following yesterday's blogger conference call I had with Skip and Giuliani communications director Jim Dyke, I had the honor of being the only blogger amidst the media throng in attendance at a house party featuring former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani last evening at the Hampton Falls, NH home of Tom and Ellen Christo. I can report the level of enthusiasm and the general upbeat, party-like atmosphere was remarkably different from most recent Republican events I have attended since this past November. Rudy is most definitely the Republican "rock-star" of the moment. What is especially appealing to me is that he brings a large amount of substance to back up the hype. Here is an eight minute video of the meat of what he had to say...

Bloggers call with Jim Dyke of the Giuliani Campaign

Doug and I were fortunate to spend 40 minutes with Jim Dyke, Senior Communications Director for the Rudy Giuliani exploratory committee discussing a wide range of questions.  Jim spent 12 years working in Washington on a number of national campaigns and for the RNC.  He was casual and affable; we enjoyed our time with him.

As this will be a joint post , Doug will have his own set of questions and answers - his were more general while I was looking for specific questions.

 

What is the strategy of the Rudy campaign with respect to bloggers? 

Bloggers are an important part of the media strategy.  It is important way to get the message out to the broader, newer audience in the blogosphere.  There will be an eCampaign director appointed soon.  In the meantime, Patrick Ruffini is an advisor.

Note: Patrick Ruffini a top level conservative blogger - he is a big "catch" for Rudy and will do a lot to help the campaign.

 

Rudy talks about cutting wasteful NYC programs while he was Mayor.  Does he really think he can do that at the Federal Level?  And how would that be done (which ones....)?

He had a bit harder time in answering this question.  People expect government to work, especially with programs like Medicare and Social Security.  Jim said that people should look at Rudy's past committment to restructure programs that were not needed in NYC or that were not working as an indication of what may be to come.  However, no specifics were given.

Note: Jim seems to be taking a "conservative" approach in answering - while perhaps not answer in the fullness ("the Grok of it"), I got the sense that these will come as time progresses and Jim learns more about Rudy.


Is Rudy in favor of a Federal Tax Cap (formal or informal)?

Rudy has already showed a committment to containing costs - he turned around a large deficit to large surplus by slashing programs and employees, but also in growing the local economy and getting lots of people off of welfare and back to work.

Does Rudy favor the FairTax or a flat tax to replace the current IRS code?

No specifics at this time, but did mention that Steve Forbes (former Presidential candidate himself and a proponent of a flat tax) has signed onto the campaign - a good catch again.
 

Global War on Terror - will Rudy start calling it GWOI (Global War on Islamofascists), as Terror is a tactic, a tool while radical Islam is the philosophy driving it?  Will he come out and name the enemy specifically?

Jim said that the "War on Terror" is a bad name.  It really is the terrorist war on us (we did not start this).  It is waged by those that seek to come here and kill us.  They and their objectives need to be identified and discussed (he did not answer about Islam - he does not want answer it for Rudy).

 

Follow on question about the Geneva Conventions given the world's reaction to Gitmo and Iran's taking of uniformed British forces in Iraq's waters and threatening to put them on trial as spies.

He does not know what Rudy's answer to this would be.



Where does Rudy stand on school vouchers, charter schools, and national standards / NCLB?

Jim says that educating our kids needs to improve.  Rudy had a hard time trying to reform it in NYC.   He supports school choice and showed it by the creation of 17 Charter Schools in NYC in 1999.  Starting in 2000, Rudy set up funding for $250K to start new ones (Skip->I believe that was for each new one).

 

Global warming - truth or hype?  What does Rudy think of Kyoto?  More nuke plants?

The debate continues about whether it is man made (partially or fully).  Rudy would rather discuss  solutions - we need to create new energy sources (e.g., clean coal, nukes) to supply new demands from the economy and to keep it growing.  He would rather focus on solutions rather than debate of being carbon neutral.   We have to be able to sustain ourselves - can we really build enough windmills (lots and lots would be needed) at a reasonable cost to actually make enough electricity to make it worthwhile?


I had a number of other questions that went unasked, but hey, I was happy to have the time we had with Jim.  We look forward to talking with him again.
======================================================================

Doug writes...

We want to thank Jim for spending time with us here at the 'Grok. As an active citizen journalist in the New Media, I appreciate the time and attention some of the campaigns are giving this medium. Also, it should be noted that Katie Harbath, Deputy eCampaign Director (obviously recognizing the Web as being important) has been everything one might want from someone running an "e-campaign." Also, I should shout a "thanks!" to Chris Wood, AKA "Woody" who got the ball rolling in the first place. I've been doing the NH political game for quite a few years now, and if something's happening of any import politically, Woody's lurking around somewhere close by. Anyway, my questions for Jim and his responses...

Where does the Mayor stand on NH’s first in the Nation primary status?

He prefers it stay consistant with history. It is extremely important, yet the reality is that the primaries are changing, which poses significant challenges by having candidates needing to cover more states now. The opinion is that it elevates NH's stature.

How much time does the Mayor plan on spending here in the Granite State?

Obviously as much as possible. Because of a somewhat later start, the campaign is still trying to figure out how to allocate time in the best way.

Will he engage in the so-called “retail” campaigning NH is known for, such as open town hall style meetings?

As most people who know him are aware, he's his own best advocate. You can see  firsthand the true committment and passions. Hopefully you'll see him more  and more. The quickly unfolding campaign is certainly a temporary challenge. While small settings are something we all want, you have to consider that against the value of enabling larger numbers of people the opportunity to get to know the Mayor.


I see that the fundraising has gone very well. Why do you think that is?

People like his conservative governing philosophy combined with a sort of crisis management ability. He's generating real excitement in that Republicans believe he could beat Hillary or any other of the Democrats who might come along.

What would you say are his 3 main themes?

There are three, with another above all...

1. Conservative governing principles-- Fighting crime. Economic activity. Welfare reform.

2. Leadership- record as Mayor. Crisis.

3. The importance of education. Parental-based initiatives. Created 17 charter schools in NYC after getting a charter scool initiative passed in 1999.

Above it all, however, is the war and homeland security. That's the number one issue.

What message would he give to my 2nd Amendment friends who are generally uneasy about his gun positions?

He is pleased with the DC circuit decision. He used the city's gun laws to curb rampant gun crimes. As president, he will be strong on the 2nd Amendment.


What about my pro-life, pro-family friends?

During his tenure as Mayor, adoptions increased 67% and abortions saw a 16% reduction. While not OK personally with abortion, he doesn't believe in putting women in jail for making that choice. He supports the Hyde amendment. Because that debate has moved into the judicial range, the appointment of judges is important. As he has said, he would appoint judges like Roberts, Scalia, and Alito. Also noteworthy are the people and judges he recommended during his years in the Reagan justice department.

Some random points:

Rudy wants government to work. He seeks to combine grand ideas like those of Newt Gingrich with a leadership ability that has been proven.

Mr. Dyke was quite honest and open in his discussion with Skip and me, and I appreciate that. We look forward to further such outreaches to us here in the New Media. Thanks Jim.

April 2, 2007

Gonzo journalism goes mainstream... media, that is.

In my daily perusal of news and stories both here in the Blogosphere and in real newspapers and magazines, I often come across a little jab here and there dissing the New Media, and blogs in particular. "It's not real news," they say. "It's all lies, halftruths, and slander, and ripe for unverified statements," say others. If that's the world of the Blogosphere, and it's that bad, surely it means that the "old media" are the grownups-- the models of decorum and neutrality. Er, not really...
.
**Exclusive**
.
During a live press conference in Baghdad, Senators McCain and Graham were heckled by CNN reporter Michael Ware. An official at the press conference called Ware’s conduct “outrageous,” saying, “here you have two United States Senators in Bagdad giving first-hand reports while Ware is laughing and mocking their comments. I’ve never witnessed such disrespect. This guy is an activist not a reporter.”
.
Senators McCain and Graham flew into Iraq and drove into Baghdad, making stops at an open market and a joint Iraq/American military security outpost before appearing at the press conference.
.
This is not the first time Michael Ware has taken issue with Senator McCain’s comments about early progress in Iraq. Last week, after Senator McCain told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he needed to catch up on the news coming out of Iraq, Michael Ware responded, saying:
.
“I don't know what part of Neverland Senator McCain is talking about when he says we can go strolling in Baghdad.”
.
Michael Ware has also publicly expressed his views on the war last year in an interview with Bill Maher, saying, “I've been given a front-row ticket to watch this slow-motion train wreck … I try to stay as drunk for as long as possible while I'm here … In fact, I'm drinking now.”
.
Developing...
Now really, do you think what Mr. Ware reports to the viewers on CNN is more reliable and trustworthy than the information that one finds at places like Michelle Malkin, AnkleBitingPundits, GraniteGrok, RightWingNews,The Daily Acts, and others like it, including the numerous milblogs? Heckling two US Senators as they visit a war zone? Shame on Mr. Ware.

An accountability test?

Blogging will be light for me [Skip] over the next few weeks as I am diving back into more of the technical matters of both 'Groks and to help getting live streaming working for Meet The New Press.  In the mean time, think about this:

"Like a lot of folks in this state I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem.


What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them??


Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ass. Could you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?????

Good point....why do we wish to subsidize illegal behavior..... 

[Doug Comment]: This may be an oldie, but it is absolutely on the money. Going into the local post office, I notice the bulletin board is riddled with info sheets from the various members of the local "non-profit" social services industrial complex-- as if competing with one another for new "clients." Food. Shelter. Housing. Health care. Etc. It's all there. Each thumb-tacked flyer has handy tear-sheets so you don't even need a pen to write anything down.

Now, I'm all for giving a helping hand to those in need. However, you have to wonder at what point does all that charity subsidize bad behavior? And why not a test? The joke IS right-- ask anyone with a CDL or a job with any big company. They have to submit a sample. And they ARE the ones whose money gets redistributed to fill the many money pipelines that feed the so-called "charities."

April 1, 2007

Taxation by a thousand cuts...

In his "State House Dome" column found in today's New Hampshire Sunday News (Union Leader), Tom Fahey writes about some new taxes being raised (foisted) upon certain NH persons and businesses. "But wait, Doug. Don't we live in 'tax-free' New Hampshire?" Oh, sure. While it's true we don't (yet) have an official broad-based tax, we have a slew of other taxes disguised as "fees". While it might be (supposedly) dangerous for a NH politician to advocate enacting new taxes, raising the already existing ones seem to be fair game. And naturally, especially with Democrats now in the driver's seat of NH government, when it comes to running the state, cutting costs and trying to find ways to save money is NEVER an option. Raising taxes is the ONLY solution. Writes Fahey:
Be honest. You knew some taxes would go up. But if you drive a big truck or smoke, it's going to be painful.
.
The House Ways and Means Committee last week settled on the tax increases it will recommend to make the next two-year budget work.
.
Truckers would pay an extra $200 in state registration fees each year.
.
Car owners will pay an extra $6 a year. The money is meant to help the state Highway Fund regain its fiscal health.
.
Smokers might have thought it was bad that Lynch proposed the second 28-cent tobacco tax increase in two years. Ways and Means went him one better -- actually 17 cents better -- and raised the tax by 45 cents.
.
The real estate transfer fee will go up by 30 cents each for buyers and sellers of land and buildings. That's about a 4 percent increase on the current $7.50 per $1,000 of value per party.
Oh, you don't smoke? Don't drive a truck and don't plan on selling your house? Don't worry, they'll come and find what YOU do, and raise the fee on that next. You'll see...

 

President Bush slams the Dems

In this week's radio address, President Bush discusses the passage of the outragous suplemental appropriations bill passed by Democrats over the objections of many people who believe we can win the war. He also talks about Democrat spending and looming tax increases that will result. He really slams the Dems hard in thiis one. If only he had been doing this for the last 6 years, he might be working with a Republican Congress instead of what we have now...
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. In recent days, the House and Senate each passed emergency war spending bills that undercut our troops in the field. Each of the Democrats' bills would substitute the judgment of politicians in Washington for that of our generals on the ground. Each bill would impose restrictive conditions on our military commanders. Each bill would also set an arbitrary deadline for surrender and withdrawal in Iraq, and I believe that would have disastrous consequences for our safety here at home.
.
The Democrats loaded up their bills with billions of dollars in domestic spending completely unrelated to the war, including $3.5 million for visitors to tour the Capitol, $6.4 million for the House of Representatives' Salaries and Expenses Account, and $74 million for secure peanut storage. I like peanuts as much as the next guy, but I believe the security of our troops should come before the security of our peanut crop. For all these reasons, that is why I made it clear to the Democrats in Congress, I will veto the bill.
Hear hear! I must admit that the President, along with other Republicans like McCain et al, have done a pretty good job at pasting the Democrats on the so-called "pork" loaded in the bill. He continues:

Democrats in the House and the Senate also recently passed their annual budget resolutions. Their budgets would raise your taxes and raise government spending in Washington. And their budgets fail to address the most serious challenge to our Nation's fiscal health: the unsustainable growth in entitlement programs, like Social Security and Medicare.

.
Overall, the Democrats would raise taxes by a total of nearly $400 billion over the next five years. To put this in perspective, this would be the largest tax increase in our Nation's history, even larger than the tax increase the Democrats passed the last time they controlled Congress.

.
Let me explain what it will mean for your annual tax bill if the Democrats get their way. If you have children, the Democrats would raise your taxes by $500 for each child. If you're a family of four making $60,000 a year, the Democrats would raise your taxes by more than $1,800. If you're a single mother with two children working to make ends meet, the Democrats would raise your taxes by more than $1,000. If you are a small business owner working to meet a payroll, the Democrats would raise your taxes by almost $4,000. And more than five million low-income Americans who currently pay no income taxes because of our tax relief would once again have to pay. Whether you have a family, work for a living, own a business, or are simply struggling to get by on a low income, the Democrats want to raise your taxes.
.
The Democrats plan to spend all those extra tax dollars. In the Senate, Democrats have passed a budget that would spend $145 billion more than I have requested over the next five years. In the House, Democrats have passed a budget that would spend even more -- $213 billion above my request.
.
With their budgets, the Democrats have revealed their true intentions. During the last campaign, Democrats said that under their "pay as you go" approach, they would pay for their new spending. Now we see what they meant by that. The Democrats have chosen a "tax as you go" approach that requires you to cut your spending to pay higher taxes. And Democrats will use these higher taxes to spend more of your money on their special interest projects.
.
Our Nation cannot afford such reckless taxing and spending. Under my Administration, we have kept your taxes low and restrained government spending in Washington. Now, America's economy is leading the world, with an economic expansion that has produced 42 months of uninterrupted job growth and created more than 7.5 million new jobs. The fastest way to stop this growth in its tracks would be to allow the Democrats in Congress to impose higher taxes on you so they can spend more of your money.
.
I believe there's a better way to balance our Federal budget. Last month, I sent Congress a plan that would eliminate the Federal deficit in five years, without raising your taxes. In the months ahead, I will work with Republicans and responsible Democrats in Congress to pass a disciplined budget and to stop the Democratic leadership from taking our Nation back to tax-and-spend policies of the past. By setting clear spending priorities and keeping taxes low, we can keep our economy growing, support our troops in the war on terror, and ensure our children and grandchildren inherit a more prosperous and hopeful America.
.
Thank you for listening.
.
END
This is exactly what President Bush needs to do-- provide detail. My favorite line is "Let me explain..." He should spend lots of time explaining, in detail for the American people, many of the myriad issues & problems the Nation faces. People would understand, if only they have the information. And the President must know by now that he can't rely on the mainstream media to do it, either. As he likes to say, "It's hard work." That's true Mr. President, but it's what MUST be done.