blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Ankle Biting Pundits
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

Local Commentary


GilfordGrok
NH Insider
Pun Salad
Rob Boyce Blog
Drew Cline
New Hampshire Commentary
Laconia's Purse
One Voice In Gilford
The Blogging Councilor
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers
Epping Residents for Principled Government
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market and Limited Government


Sam Adams Alliance>

RedState
Flat Creek Management
John Fund-Wall Street Journal
Face the State
Fort Hard Knox
Americans for Prosperity
American Princess
ARRA News Service
Mount Virtus
ILGOPnet
Stix
Wichita Liberty
Kansas Meadowlark
Louisiana Conservative
Maine Web Report
Mackinac Center
Outside Lansing
Gateway Pundit
Montana Politics
Muth’s Truths
Granite Grok
Mario Burgos
Thurber’s Thoughts
Oklahoma Political News Service
Tennessee Policy Institute
Leslie Carbone
Sound Politics
Real Debate Wisconsin
Haemet
Grizzly Groundswell
Sibby Online


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Gates Of Vienna
Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Our Friend Pat's Townhall columns
Liz Mair
NH Primary News Links
PolitickerNH
PorkBusters
Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Victory Caucus

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science
US Senate Comm. on Environ. - Public Works

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Captain's Quarters
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Junkyard Blog
Overlawyered
Politicaldoodle
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr (radio)
Political Chowder(TV)
The Rush Limbaugh Show (radio)

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Presidential Campaign Sites

Last Man Standing


John McCain


Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Gorbachev - as if he did anything right? | Main | Meet The New Press »

President's Radio Address: "Real Consequences"

This week President Bush spoke of North Korea's apparent detonation of a nuclear bomb. This is, of course, really bad news for the US and the rest of the world- the fact that one of the main members of the "Axis of Evil" now has such a weapon.
.
The president continues to push the "6-party" talks while his detractors want direct negotiations between the US and North Korea. Go figure- Bush, after getting lambasted for "going it alone" in various aspects of the new world war wants six nations (most of which are in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula) involved with the diplomatic efforts, while his political foes encourage a process that excludes all but the US. Thank God President Bush seemingly stays focused on the task at hand, and not his popularity as defined by the opposition...
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a successful nuclear weapons test. In response to North Korea's provocative actions, America is working with our partners in the region and in the United Nations Security Council to ensure that there are serious repercussions for the North Korean regime.
.
North Korea has been pursuing nuclear weapons and defying its international commitments for years. In 1993, North Korea announced that it was withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The United States negotiated with North Korea and reached a bilateral agreement in 1994: North Korea committed to giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for help with peaceful nuclear power.
.
After I came to office, we discovered that North Korea had been violating this agreement for some time by continuing work on a covert nuclear weapons program. My administration confronted the North Korea regime with this evidence in 2002, and the North Koreans subsequently walked away from the 1994 agreement.
.
So my Administration decided to take a new approach. We brought together other nations in the region in an effort to resolve the situation through multilateral diplomacy. The logic behind this approach is clear: North Korea's neighbors have the most at stake, and they are North Korea's principal sources of food, energy, and trade, so it makes sense to enlist them in the effort to get the North Korean regime to end its nuclear program.
.
This diplomatic effort was called the Six-Party Talks, and these talks included North and South Korea, China, Japan, Russia and the United States. In September of last year, these diplomatic efforts resulted in a wide-ranging Joint Statement that offered a resolution to the problem and a better life for the North Korean people. In this Joint Statement, North Korea committed to abandoning all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs. North Korea was offered the prospect of normalized relations with Japan and the United States, as well as economic cooperation in energy, trade, and investment. And the United States affirmed that we have no nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula and no intention to attack or invade North Korea.
.
Unfortunately, North Korea failed to act on its commitment. And with its actions this week, the North Korean regime has once again broken its word, provoked an international crisis, and denied its people the opportunity for a better life. We are working for a resolution to this crisis. Nations around the world, including our partners in the Six-Party Talks, agree on the need for a strong United Nations Security Council resolution that will require North Korea to dismantle its nuclear programs. This resolution should also specify measures to prevent North Korea from importing or exporting nuclear or missile technologies. And it should prevent financial transactions or asset transfers that would help North Korea develop its nuclear or missile capabilities.
.
By passing such a resolution, we will send a clear message to the North Korean regime that its actions will not be tolerated. And we will give the nations with the closest ties to North Korea -- China and South Korea -- a framework to use their leverage to pressure Pyongyang and persuade its regime to change course.
.
As we pursue a diplomatic solution, we are also reassuring our allies in the region that America remains committed to their security. We have strong defense alliances with Japan and South Korea, and the United States will meet these commitments. And in response to North Korea's provocation, we will seek to increase our defense cooperation with our allies, including cooperation on ballistic missile defense to protect against North Korean aggression, and cooperation to prevent North Korea from importing or exporting nuclear or missile technologies.
.
Our goals remain clear: peace and security in Northeast Asia, and a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. We will do what is necessary to achieve these goals. We will support our allies in the region, we will work with the United Nations, and together we will ensure that North Korea faces real consequences if it continues down its current path.
.
Thank you for listening.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/389

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone