blog advertising is good for you

Blogroll


Favorites


Instapundit
FrontPageMag.Com
Michelle Malkin
Ankle Biting Pundits
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne.com
The Corner
Weekend Pundit

Local Commentary


GilfordGrok
NH Insider
Pun Salad
Rob Boyce Blog
Drew Cline
New Hampshire Commentary
Laconia's Purse
One Voice In Gilford
The Blogging Councilor
ConChrist (Lori Ingham)

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Gilford Steamer
The Union Leader
The Concord Monitor
The Nashua Telegraph

Activists


Bow Citizens Coalition
Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers
Epping Residents for Principled Government
Moultonborough Citizens Alliance
State Sunshine and Open Records
Wiki for Freedom of Information Act
Sunshine Review
BallotPedia

Sam Adams Alliance blogs

Free Market and Limited Government


Sam Adams Alliance>

RedState
Flat Creek Management
John Fund-Wall Street Journal
Face the State
Fort Hard Knox
Americans for Prosperity
American Princess
ARRA News Service
Mount Virtus
ILGOPnet
Stix
Wichita Liberty
Kansas Meadowlark
Louisiana Conservative
Maine Web Report
Mackinac Center
Outside Lansing
Gateway Pundit
Montana Politics
Muth’s Truths
Granite Grok
Mario Burgos
Thurber’s Thoughts
Oklahoma Political News Service
Tennessee Policy Institute
Leslie Carbone
Sound Politics
Real Debate Wisconsin
Haemet
Grizzly Groundswell
Sibby Online


News


BlogNetNews for NH
CNSNews
Drudge Report
WorldNetDaily
Snopes
RefDesk

Islamic World


Gates Of Vienna
Dhimmi Watch
Jihad Watch
MEMRI

Pure Politics


Our Friend Pat's Townhall columns
Liz Mair
NH Primary News Links
PolitickerNH
PorkBusters
Real Clear Politics
Red State

MilBlogs


Blackfive
Defense Tech
Sgt Stryker
OpFor
Strategy Page
Michael Yon Online Magazine
Mudville Gazette

Victory Caucus

Environmentalism (or not)


Junk Science
US Senate Comm. on Environ. - Public Works

Geeky Stuff


Geek Press
Slashdot

Education


F.I.R.E.
Joanne Jacobs
Thomas Fordham Foundation
EIA Intercepts
Core Knowledge

Blog Commentaries


Austin Bay
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Captain's Quarters
Conservative Grapevine
Contentions
Eye on the UN
Hugh Hewitt
Junkyard Blog
Overlawyered
Politicaldoodle
Mark Steyn
Neal Boortz
TCS Daily
Townhall.com
Power Line
Right Wing News
NewsBusters

Radio and TV Shows


Howie Carr (radio)
Political Chowder(TV)
The Rush Limbaugh Show (radio)

Design - Architecture - Stuff


Engadget
Gizmodo
Inhabitat
Uncrate

Presidential Campaign Sites

Last Man Standing


John McCain


Humor


DILBERT BLOG


« Two Fundamentalisms | Main | Dope of the Week: Jimmah Cahtah »

Is competition really that bad? Apparently some think so.

We've all heard the stories of children's sports leagues where there are no winners and losers- a perfect, utopian world where everybody is a winner and everyone gets a trophy. There's even places, we're told, where scores are not kept, because determining a "winner" is not as important as everybody having fun. Usually this stuff happens somewhere else- in some distant place referred to in the news or on some talk radio program.
.
Guess what? This kind of "softening" of sports can happen even in places with tough-sounding names like the "Granite" state. The (Laconia, NH) Citizen Online reports in its August 15th issue that the Gilford (NH) School Board is considering a "no-cut" policy for its varsity sports programs:
School board member Margo Weeks suggested that the board look into keeping all those students on who wanted to play varsity sports. This stance would effectively do away with cuts for initial varsity team rosters.
During discusion of the topic, not all school board members agreed, noting that cuts are needed on varsity teams, with the alternative being problematic for coaches and players over who gets to play. The proponent of the "no-cut" policy responded to the criticism of the proposal, noting, according to the Citizen, that
"I think kids figure it out after they sit on the bench for a couple of seasons." She noted that this way kids will effectively cut themselves from the teams, rather than having coaches select them to be removed.

Board members were divided on this issue. Though the general consensus was that in not having cuts it could be detrimental to coaching, as well as team effort overall.

It was also pointed out that this type of self removal could harm a students self esteem, if they were forced to remove themselves.
One of the classic characteristics of liberalism is the inability to make decisions and the avoidance of conflict at all costs. What exactly are we teaching our children about life when we engage in this sort of nonsense?
.
Am I wrong? Feel free to comment below...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/213

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is competition really that bad? Apparently some think so.:

» "No Cut" Policy Is Left Coast Lunacy from Weekend Pundit
Anyone of you folks out there that have read this blog for any length of time know, I am one of those people that look... [Read More]

» High Stakes Obfuscation from GilfordGrok
Our School District Superintendent, Dr. DeMinico, has written yet another missive trying to downplay the use of standardized testing in school systems. It can be seen here at the Laconia Citizen (registration required), Laconia Daily Sun (not online),... [Read More]

Comments

This isn't removal of competition. It's simply a weaselly way of cutting someone. To leave a kid on the bench is cutting him, but without the decency of letting him know up front where he stands. What's that going to do to a kid's self esteem? Will he ever learn to respect authority when authority won't be straight up with him? Or to trust anyone? If someone did this to me I'd make a huge fuss. If they don't want me playing let them have the guts to say so, and then say exactly why. It's dishonest on multiple levels. Dishonest in that it pretends it's about avoiding competition and then dishonest in the way it treats those who don't make the cut. In honest competition you get feedback, and you get a chance to fix whatever's holding you back. But here there's no communication. Nobody knows where he stands until it's too late to do anything about it. No kid gets a chance to learn or improve himself in this system. He just gets acceptance or rejection, without any reasons given for either.
I hadn't even considered it from this perspective- but I'd say you've made excellent points. Rowland writes "Will he ever learn to respect authority when authority won't be straight up with him?"- This is one of those profound statements that I wish I'd thought of first! Great Comments!!!!

Post a comment


PODCAST

Care and Feeding of GraniteGrok by PoliGrok, LLC

blog advertising is good for you
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
mobile phone