<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>GraniteGrok</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="GraniteGrok" />
    <updated>2010-03-18T22:51:26Z</updated>
    <subtitle>gran·ite  n.    1. A common... hard igneous rock... used in monuments and for building.   2. Unyielding endurance or steadfastness: a will of granite.

grok: /grok/,   var. /grohk/ vt. [from the novel &quot;Stranger in a Strange Land&quot;, by Heinlein,  where it   means metaphorically `to be one with&apos;] The emphatic form is `grok in fullness&apos;.   
1. To understand, usually in a global sense. Connotes intimate and exhaustive  knowledge.-- The Jargon File 3.2.0
</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.35</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Executive Decision - This stays topmost until the vote is taken</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/executive_decision_this_stay_topmost_unt.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5195" title="Executive Decision - This stays topmost until the vote is taken" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5195</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-19T03:33:16Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T22:51:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[UPDATE:&nbsp; The Dems have voted to use the Slaughter Solution of voting to not vote (yeah, they won't read it, and now, don't want to be on record as voting for it.&nbsp; Shea-Porter &amp; Hodes voted not to vote.In disparaging...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Announcements" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE:&nbsp; The Dems have voted to use the Slaughter Solution of voting to not vote (yeah, they won't read it, and now, don't want to be on record as voting for it.&nbsp; Shea-Porter &amp; Hodes voted not to vote.</strong><br /></p><p>In disparaging the Founding Geniuses' vision of limited government that would protect individual liberties,&nbsp; Obama, Reid &amp; Pelosi are truly out to transform America into a socialist state in which Government will intrude, by law &amp; regulation, into every nook &amp; cranny of our individual lives.&nbsp; Obamacare will turn every citizen from being free into merely a client of the State - forcing a dependence upon Government that is unneeded, unwarranted, &amp; undesired.&nbsp; We are the frog;&nbsp; Obamacare Socialism is the slowly boiling water of a tyrannical State.&nbsp; It IS time to melt phone systems &amp; clog up email servers to let our  representatives know that we are in the battle, as Old Ben warned, to  keep our Republic. Barry, Harry, &amp; Nancy are trying to make  &quot;Determined Weakness&quot; a reality.&nbsp; Numbers for Congress: <strong>877-762-8762</strong>&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>202-224-3121</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;  &nbsp; &nbsp; <strong>202-225-3121. <br /></strong></p><p>For NH Readers:<strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Carol Shea-Nancy's BFF-Porter</strong> &nbsp; DC: (202) 225-5456 &nbsp; Manchester: (603) 641-9536&nbsp;&nbsp; <a target="_blank" href="http://forms.house.gov/shea-porter/webform/issue_subscribe.htm">email form</a><br /></p><blockquote><p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Paul Hodes</strong>:&nbsp; DC:&nbsp; (202) 225-5206 &nbsp; &nbsp; Concord:&nbsp; (603) 223-9814&nbsp; <a target="_blank" href="http://hodes.house.gov/contact.aspx">email form</a><br /></p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Progressives - taking a what to the Constitution?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/progressives_taking_a_what_to_the_consti.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5202" title="Progressives - taking a what to the Constitution?" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5202</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T22:26:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T22:35:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Remember, this is Progressivism in process.&nbsp; Constitution?&nbsp; Bill of Rights? Progressivism is incremental socialism.&nbsp; You know what that means?Yeah, that's right. Satisfying every &quot;gimme&quot; person until there's no money anywhere...think I'm kidding?&nbsp; Where's that $100 Trillion owed for S.S &amp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Constitution" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember, this is Progressivism in process.&nbsp; Constitution?&nbsp; Bill of Rights? <br /></p><div style="text-align: center"><img height="288" width="374" border="0" src="/pix/slaughtersolutioncollateraldamage.JPG" /></div><p>Progressivism is incremental socialism.&nbsp; You know what that means?</p><div style="text-align: center"><img height="136" width="120" border="0" title="Socialism - legal stealing" alt="Socialism - legal stealing" src="/pix/SocialismPistol.jpg" /></div><p>Yeah, that's right. Satisfying every &quot;gimme&quot; person until there's no money anywhere...think I'm kidding?&nbsp; Where's that $100 Trillion owed for S.S &amp; Medicare coming from?&nbsp; Go ahead - ask that &quot;proud&quot; Progressive and watch them squirm....<br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>AJS to Lynch &amp; Ayotte: Hands Off NH’s Money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/ajs_to_lynch_ayotte_hands_off_nhs_money.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5203" title="AJS to Lynch &amp; Ayotte: Hands Off NH’s Money" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5203</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T22:22:58Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T22:58:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Alexandria, VA- Americans for Job Security launched advertisements today highlighting Governor John Lynch and Former Attorney General Kelly Ayotte&rsquo;s unconstitutional attempts to take private property. &nbsp;Governor John Lynch and his Attorney General Kelly Ayotte attempted one of the largest confiscations...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="US Senate 2010" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alexandria, VA- Americans for Job Security launched advertisements today highlighting Governor John Lynch and Former Attorney General Kelly Ayotte&rsquo;s unconstitutional attempts to take private property. &nbsp;<br /><br />Governor John Lynch and his Attorney General Kelly Ayotte attempted one of the largest confiscations of private property in New Hampshire history. Together, they moved to drain the private medical malpractice funds of our doctors, nurses and healthcare providers. Thankfully the Supreme Court slapped down their $110 million raid of private funds. <br /><br />&ldquo;The people of New Hampshire deserve to know the truth about John Lynch and Kelly Ayotte&rsquo;s unconstitutional attempts to take private property,&rdquo; said Stephen DeMaura president of AJS. <br /><br />&ldquo;&hellip;the state&rsquo;s move was an unconstitutional taking of private property,&rdquo; Nashua Telegraph 1/29/2010 <br /><br />&ldquo;The Lynch-Ayotte mindset of private property confiscation to feed a bigger and ever growing government is fundamentally misguided,&rdquo; added DeMaura. &nbsp;<br /><br />&ldquo;If John Lynch and Kelly Ayotte thought raiding the private accounts of Doctors, Nurses and health care providers was ok then what about the victims&rsquo; restitution fund, or College 529 savings plans?,&rdquo; DeMaura said. <br /><br />AJS&rsquo;s initial effort includes a petition and website at <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.HandsOffNH.com">www.HandsOffNH.com</a></strong>, as well as internet and direct mail advertising. <br /><br />Americans for Job Security is a non-profit, non-partisan pro-business issue advocacy organization that promotes issues that strengthen the American economy. To learn more about AJS visit <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.SaveJobs.org">www.SaveJobs.org</a></strong>.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Full Disclosure: Yes, AJS has taken out ads on the 'Grok - just like PETA did once.&nbsp; After all, we are capitalists in heart and spirit (although I will admit, having the PETA ad allowed us a few more jokes than normal...and paid for a GREAT Prime Rib dinner for me) <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>It wasn&apos;t &quot;my&quot; democrat - but they act the same way</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/it_wasnt_my_democrat_but_they_act_the_sa.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5201" title="It wasn't &quot;my&quot; democrat - but they act the same way" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5201</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T21:54:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T22:23:53Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Both Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter have just voted for the Slaughter Solution which readies a vote to not vote on Obamacare - that act that, after Social Security and Medicare, will be the largest theft of the young generation&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Plain Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Both Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter have just voted for the Slaughter Solution which readies a vote to not vote on Obamacare - that act that, after Social Security and Medicare, will be the largest theft of the young generation's money to the eldest in history. Even as I am getting close to being in that &quot;elder cohort&quot; (if it is still around - am beginning to have my severe doubts), essentially it is politicians of both stripes that do believe it is theirs to give.<br /></p><p>To be sure, it isn't just Democrats that steal their taxpayers money - Repubs have joined in the &quot;stealfest&quot; as a way of political life.&nbsp; However, it is this one, Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) effectively&nbsp; warns us, like any addict, &quot;we'll keep doing this until you stop us!&quot;.</p><p align="center"><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j0GmQwXMfW4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j0GmQwXMfW4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="385"></embed></object><br /></p><p>(H/T: <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/18/video-democrat-rep-perriello-admits-if-you-dont-tie-our-hands-we-will-keep-stealing/" target="_blank">Michelle</a>)<br /></p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>National Journal - poll for week of 3/18/10</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/national_journal_poll_for_week_of_31810.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5178" title="National Journal - poll for week of 3/18/10" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5178</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T21:23:19Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T21:28:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[ Bloggers Poll: Don't Follow the LeadersLeft and Right Continue To See A Setback For Senate Democrats in NovemberNational Journal has their latest poll where Right-side and Left-side bloggers are polled on various issues.&nbsp; This week, Left and right partisans...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Political Blogging" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div class="entry-body">                               <div class="entry-body">                                <div class="entry-body">                                <p align="center"><strong>Bloggers Poll: Don't Follow the Leaders</strong><br /></p><p align="center"><strong>Left and Right Continue To See A Setback For  Senate Democrats in November</strong><br /></p><p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/03/bloggers_poll_d.php">National   Journal</a></strong> has their latest poll   where Right-side and   Left-side bloggers are polled on various issues.&nbsp;  This week, Left and right partisans are precisely opposed on the president's re-election chances. And while left-leaners see health care reform passing, right-leaners see the bill's chances as little better than 50-50.<br /><br />But there's one thing both groups can agree on: how little they like their national party chairmen.</p><p>As   always,  <a href="http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/03/bloggers_poll_d.php" target="_blank">click</a>   on over to see all the comments (although,   being in NH, I'm singling  out the NH based ones here): <br /></p><p><strong>1.  On a scale of 0 to 10, what's the likelihood that Congress will pass health care reform?</strong><br /></p><blockquote><p><strong>Right</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp; 5.6<br /></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><strong>Left</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  7.8<br /></p></blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p>   		</p><br /></blockquote></blockquote><p><strong>2. Is {Michael Steele | Tim Kaine} an asset or a liability as {RNC | DNC} chairman?<br /></strong></p></div><blockquote><div class="entry-body"><strong>Right</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>(Michael Steele, RNC)</strong></div><blockquote><div class="entry-body">&nbsp;Asset:&nbsp; 31.3%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Liability: 68.8% </div></blockquote><div class="entry-body"><strong>Left</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>(Tim Kaine, DNC)</strong></div><blockquote><div class="entry-body">&nbsp; Asset: 30.8%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Liability: 69.2%</div></blockquote></blockquote><div class="entry-body">My answers after the jump (and a couple of good quips as well): <br /></div>                            </div>                            </div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>1.  On a scale of 0 to 10, what's the likelihood that Congress will pass  health care reform?</strong><br /></p><blockquote><p><strong>Me</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp;  5.0 </p></blockquote><p style="margin-left: 40px">Comment:&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left: 80px">Do the Dems have the  chutzpah to go against a specific Constitutional clause to advance the  Progressive (re:incremental socialism) and at a heavy political cost?&nbsp;  This is a tipping point against the Founders' vision and for European  style socialism - do the Dems want to be known for making America into  Europe West? <br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>2.&nbsp;</strong><strong> Is Michael Steele </strong><strong>an asset or a liability as </strong><strong>RNC chairman?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><blockquote><div class="entry-body"><strong>Me</strong>:&nbsp;&nbsp; Liability</div></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="margin-left: 40px">Comment:</div><p style="margin-left: 80px">Too often, it is about Michael  Steele and not about traditional Republican ideals or the platform.<br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Normally, I don't post the comments and asked that for the non-NH based comments that you would <a href="http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/03/bloggers_poll_d.php" target="_blank">click</a> through.&nbsp; However, this week I think that the Dems were much funnier in describing their Chair than the Repubs:</p><p style="margin-left: 40px">&quot;What he knows about strategy would fill a shot glass.&quot; Susie Madrak, <a target="_blank" href="http://susiemadrak.com/">Suburban Guerrilla</a><br /><br />&quot;Yeah, I checked 'liability,' but Kaine could be an asset... you know, the way a thick, trashy novel can also be used as a doorstop.&quot; Gregg Levine, <a target="_blank" href="http://firedoglake.com/">Firedoglake</a> <br /></p><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>What a Progressive would say instead of the original?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/what_a_progressive_would_say_instead_of.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5180" title="What a Progressive would say instead of the original?" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5180</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T13:53:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:57Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A conservative&apos;s version of a Progressive&apos;s remake of one of the most famous lines in American history:Give me liberty, or give me dea ... lol just kidding. Give me entitlements -- CalebHowe(H/T: RightWingNews)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Humor" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A conservative's version of a Progressive's remake of one of the most famous lines in American history:</p><blockquote><p>Give me liberty, or give me dea ... lol just kidding. Give me entitlements </p><blockquote><p>-- CalebHowe</p></blockquote></blockquote><p>(H/T: <a href="http://rightwingnews.com/2010/03/the-top-10-coffee-party-rules/" target="_blank">RightWingNews</a>) <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Creative Destruction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/creative_destruction.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5200" title="Creative Destruction" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5200</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T13:15:41Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T13:22:45Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[What was once a mainstay of the home entertainment zeitgeist is about to be altered, perhaps forever.&nbsp; Blockbuster has announced that it may have to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.&nbsp; Apparently the once mighty rental giant does not fall...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri>www.granitegrok.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Free Markets" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<img width="200" height="128" title="Blockbuster" align="right" alt="Blockbuster" src="http://www.pocketfinancialplanner.com/blog/images/blockbuster_logo.png" border="0" />What was once a mainstay of the home entertainment zeitgeist is about to be altered, perhaps forever.&nbsp; Blockbuster has announced that it may have to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.&nbsp; Apparently the once mighty rental giant does not fall into the too big to fail category nor does it qualify for some kind of TARP-like bailout.&nbsp; Of course Blockbuster backing down on a buyout of Circuit City retail stores saw the end of that national chain, so it almost seems appropriate that the management of a company that would even consider buying Circuit City might face a similar fate.<span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span> <p><span style="color: windowtext">It just might be that time.&nbsp;</span><span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color: windowtext">The free market has produced faster, cheaper, more reliable, and more service oriented alternatives, all competing aggressively for market share and creating significantly more jobs and opportunities than will be lost by the global giant that was once Blockbuster.&nbsp; And if Blockbuster can&rsquo;t reconcile its problems with debt holders and is no more, there will be plenty of scavengers to pick up the pieces, to create new growth from the remains.&nbsp; But then that is what open markets do.&nbsp; They encourage people with little more than an idea and some energy to encourage the decline of lumbering goliaths for the mutual benefit of the consumer and the industry.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a process liberals bemoan, one that they work tirelessly to subvert, and since January 2009 have doubled down on.</span><span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><span style="color: windowtext">There will be no bail out of Blockbuster, probably because they don&rsquo;t have the right kind of high powered lobbyists in Washington working to protect the movie rental industry.&nbsp; There are no fundraisers or parties with big names schmoozing up Senators and their wives to convince them of the economic impact of shuttering retail locations and putting all those folks out of work during a restructuring.&nbsp; There&rsquo;s no public sector union employee jobs at stake, no UAW or SEIU &lsquo;families&rsquo; will be affected&mdash;unless they just happened to get all their movie and game rentals from a Blockbuster that was once near them.</span><span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color: windowtext">And this is as it should be.&nbsp; Efficient and innovative giants and collectives survive, sometimes to become corporatist whores who then try to use government to wipe out their competitors or gain an unfair advantage. (GE, WAL-MART, AHIP, AARP, PhRMA and so on) But in an actual open market, that purchased advantage is still not enough to keep free thinking individuals from carving out a corner of the market for themselves by offer a better product or service.&nbsp; At least for a little while longer.&nbsp;</span><span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color: windowtext">The government has already decided who the winners and losers should be in the auto industry, banking, energy, insurance, and &nbsp;education.&nbsp; And each of these markets will &ndash;in coming years--begin to suffer the pangs of control which inevitably affect quality and availability.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;There will be an observable decline in the ability of consumers to find alternatives.&nbsp; Price fixing will impact quality.&nbsp; Bureaucracy will impede access.&nbsp; And in the not too distant future&mdash;the one imagined by liberal planners with the &ldquo;Hi My Name Is Utopia&rdquo; sticker affixed crookedly to its lapel&mdash;the &lsquo;winners&rsquo; chosen by the government today will be like the large inefficient Blockbusters of tomorrow except that there will be no mechanism for its improvement or replacement.&nbsp;&nbsp; Changing government was never supposed to be easy, which is why after you turn it into something bad, its twice as hard to turn back.&nbsp; &nbsp;So with no engine of renewal, no path for creative destruction, the innovative engine that was once America will die at the hands of Barack Obama and everyone who was too stupid or too ignorant to see the danger the liberal agenda presents to real liberty.</span><span style="color: windowtext">&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color: windowtext">Governments cannot create liberty, or choice, or freedom, they can only take it away.&nbsp; It is a lesson you can only learn from history.&nbsp; And those who refuse to learn it are left with even fewer choices if or when they or their ancestors, decide they want it back.</span></p><span style="color: windowtext"><span style="color: windowtext"><p><span style="color: windowtext">Cross Posted <a href="http://www.nhinsider.com/steve-mac-donald/2010/3/18/creative-destruction.html" target="_blank">From NH Insider</a></span></p></span></span>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Notable Quote - Woodrow Wilson</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/notable_quote_woodrow_wilson.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5155" title="Notable Quote - Woodrow Wilson" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5155</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T12:47:49Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Liberty has never come from government.&nbsp; Liberty has always come from the subjects of government.&nbsp; The history of liberty is the history of resistance.-Woodrow Wilson, PresidentI find my self in complete agree with the above, but find it incongruent that...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Notable Quotes" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Liberty has never come from government.&nbsp; Liberty has always come from the subjects of government.&nbsp; The history of liberty is the history of resistance.</p><p>-Woodrow Wilson, President</p></blockquote><p>I find my self in complete agree with the above, but find it incongruent that it passes from the first national level politician that proudly wore the label &quot;Progressive&quot;.&nbsp; That movement, whose latest uber-proponent, is Barack Obama, believes not in the definition of liberty as espoused by the Founding Fathers but in a redefinition of that term as something given to the masses from a government composed of elites governing from the heights of an &quot;enlightened&quot; sense of a rational Science of Politics that would make all those silly decisions of government for us.</p><p>In this, President Wilson may well have been describing the TEA Party movement, as these &quot;subjects&quot; are now rebelling from that self same Progressive movement's attempts to &quot;rule for us&quot;. <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Americans - not liking Obamacare at all anymore</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/americans_not_liking_obamacare_at_all_an.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5197" title="Americans - not liking Obamacare at all anymore" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5197</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T12:16:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Not at all, not at all:60% agree that a current Democrat proposal to send the Senate health care bill to the president without voting up or down on it is &ldquo;unfair.&rdquo;81% health care reforms that would increase insurance premiums for...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Healthcare" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not at all, not at all:</p><ul><li>60% agree that a current Democrat proposal to send the Senate health care bill to the president without voting up or down on it is &ldquo;unfair.&rdquo;</li><li>81% health care reforms that would increase insurance premiums for healthy people to offset premiums of people who wait until they are diagnosed with an illness to purchase insurance.</li><li>81% oppose allowing the government to decide what kind of health care coverage Americans are able to purchase.</li><li>87% oppose having a government panel recommend or decide what medical procedures or medical advances your doctor or health plan can or cannot use.</li><li>84% support reforms that would allow people to buy health insurance where it is the least expensive, such as across state lines.</li><li>76% oppose health care reforms that would raise taxes and cut Medicare benefits to pay for health care subsidies for expanded coverage for those currently insured.</li><li>78% support health care reforms that would let people buy less costly health plans and save and invest for health care needs in the future on a tax-free basis.</li><li>51% oppose health care reforms that would let people lock-in premiums by paying more for their insurance.</li><li>85% support health care reforms that would let people get lower premiums for getting or staying healthy.</li><li>82% support the idea that more money should be invested in the development of cures for the most devastating diseases.</li><li>47% oppose increasing Medicare payroll taxes for high wage earners (46% support)</li><li>48% oppose reducing what doctors and hospitals are paid for their services (45% support).</li><li>47% think it is credible that the new health care proposal will increase taxes and insurance premiums for 73 million Americans (44% say it is not). <br /></li></ul><p>More info as to where this <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/new-poll-finds-americans-really-really-do-not-want-obamacare-pjm-exclusive/?singlepage=true" target="_blank">data / poll came from</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Today, the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest Advance (CMPI-A), in partnership with Pajamas Media, is releasing national survey data on Americans&rsquo; views of the proposed health care reform legislation before Congress...GfK Roper completed 1,000 interviews with a nationally-representative sample of Americans ages 18 years old and over. The interviews were conducted between March 12 and March 14, 2010. The average margin of error for the total sample is &plusmn; 3 percentage points. <br /></p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>I do believe that Gordon has come out of retirement!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/i_do_believe_that_gordon_has_come_out_of.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5196" title="I do believe that Gordon has come out of retirement!" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5196</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T12:09:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Subject: Join Sen Humphrey on Thurs. in riding Congress out of town on a railWhen: &nbsp; &nbsp; Thursday, March 18Time: &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 4pm Where: &nbsp; &nbsp; Manchester, NH - City Hall PlazaFollowing his fiery speech in Rochester last night, former...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Freedom" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Subject: Join Sen Humphrey on Thurs. in riding Congress out of town on a rail<br /></p><blockquote><p><strong>When</strong>: &nbsp; &nbsp; Thursday, March 18</p><p><strong>Time</strong>: &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 4pm <br /></p><p><strong>Where</strong>: &nbsp; &nbsp; Manchester, NH - City Hall Plaza<br /></p></blockquote><p>Following his fiery speech in Rochester last night, former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey has called upon all Tea Party patriots and concerned citizens to join him in an emergency rally at the Manchester City Hall Plaza on, Thursday, Mar 18 at 4:00 PM.&nbsp; The purpose of tomorrow's rally in Manchester is to protest the attempt by left wing radicals in the Obama Administration and the Congress to take over the nations entire system.<br /><br />The main attraction will be the &quot;riding of Congress out of town on a rail.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;We've gotten hold of a mannequin and dressed him like a Member of Congress -- well let's call him a dummy, since he looks like a Congressman,&quot; said Andrew Hemingway, an assistant to Senator Humphrey.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.granitegrok.com/blog-mt/Subject: Join Sen Humphrey on Thurs. in riding Congress out of town on a rail  Following his fiery speech in Rochester last night, former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey has called upon all Tea Party patriots and concerned citizens to join him in an emergency rally at the Manchester City Hall Plaza on, Thursday, Mar 18 at 4:00 PM.  The purpose of tomorrow's rally in Manchester is to protest the attempt by left wing radicals in the Obama Administration and the Congress to take over the nations entire system.  The main attraction will be the &quot;riding of Congress out of town on a rail.&quot;    &quot;We've gotten hold of a mannequin and dressed him like a Member of Congress -- well let's call him a dummy, since he looks like a Congressman,&quot; said Andrew Hemingway, an assistant to Senator Humphrey.  Last night at tumultuous Tea Party rally in Rochester, in a speech described by Foster's Daily Democrat as &quot;fiery,&quot; Senator Humphrey accused the President of lying about the true cost of Obama care and lying about preserving choice of doctors.  &quot;The far left is trying to ram down our throats a massive new federal bureaucracy that will  run up trillions of dollars in deficits and destroy the finest health care delivery system in the world, subjecting us all to rationing of health care, long waiting lists, and third-rate medicine,&quot; Humphrey says.  &quot;The Tea Party movement has rallied public opinion across the nation, but some members of Congress still refuse to listen.  Government that ignores the majority is a government of thugs and tyrants,,&quot; Humphrey says.  &quot;We need to go all out in the next few days to force Reid and Pelosi to back down.  To that end, I implore every last concerned citizen to rally with us at the Manchester City Hall Plaza tomorrow.  Following remarks, we'll mount up the dummy on a rail and ride him out of town, treating him to the same contempt with which our forbears treated the despised agents of the tyrant King George!&quot;  Riding Congress out of town on a rail will make great television footage that can help swing the last needed votes in Washington.  Be a part of history.  Join us at Manchester City Hall Plaza, tomorrow, Thursday, March 18, at 4:00 PM.  If you have any &quot;Don't Tread on Me Flags&quot; or appropriate signs or banners, other Tea Party paraphernalia, or colonial costuming, bring 'em or wear 'em!" target="_blank">Last night</a> at tumultuous Tea Party rally in Rochester, in a speech described by Foster's Daily Democrat as &quot;fiery,&quot; Senator Humphrey accused the President of lying about the true cost of Obama care and lying about preserving choice of doctors.&nbsp; &quot;The far left is trying to ram down our throats a massive new federal bureaucracy that will&nbsp; run up trillions of dollars in deficits and destroy the finest health care delivery system in the world, subjecting us all to rationing of health care, long waiting lists, and third-rate medicine,&quot; Humphrey says.<br /><br />&quot;The Tea Party movement has rallied public opinion across the nation, but some members of Congress still refuse to listen.&nbsp; Government that ignores the majority is a government of thugs and tyrants,,&quot; Humphrey says.&nbsp; &quot;We need to go all out in the next few days to force Reid and Pelosi to back down.&nbsp; To that end, I implore every last concerned citizen to rally with us at the Manchester City Hall Plaza tomorrow.&nbsp; Following remarks, we'll mount up the dummy on a rail and ride him out of town, treating him to the same contempt with which our forbears treated the despised agents of the tyrant King George!&quot;<br /><br />Riding Congress out of town on a rail will make great television footage that can help swing the last needed votes in Washington.&nbsp; Be a part of history.&nbsp; Join us at Manchester City Hall Plaza, today, Thursday, March 18, at 4:00 PM.<br /><br />If you have any &quot;Don't Tread on Me Flags&quot; or appropriate signs or banners, other Tea Party paraphernalia, or colonial costuming, bring 'em or wear 'em!</p><p>(H/T: Phyllis) <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>How DARE Conservatives be against helping people!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/how_dare_conservatives_be_against_helpin.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5194" title="How DARE Conservatives be against helping people!" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5194</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T12:03:20Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[That seems to be the mantra du jour from Progressives (remember, Progressivism is the same as Marxism, only &quot;slow cooked&quot;).&nbsp; Demonizing Conservatives by holding them to be cold-hearted skin flints, holding onto the money that they earned, and wanting government...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Conservatism" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>That seems to be the mantra du jour from Progressives (remember, Progressivism is the same as Marxism, only &quot;slow cooked&quot;).&nbsp; Demonizing Conservatives by holding them to be cold-hearted skin flints, holding onto the money that they earned, and wanting government to do less and less, they let their verbal cannons fly.</p><p>Here's their single largest problem (from a post at <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/62959" target="_blank">CNSNews</a> on what the debt is going to do to the economy as a whole):</p><blockquote><p>Ryan pointed out that the Government Accountability Office recently reported that the federal government already faces a &ldquo;fiscal gap&rdquo; of <strong>$76 trillion</strong>, meaning that over the next 75 years the cost of the benefits promised in federal entitlement programs exceeds the tax revenues expected to pay for those benefits by that amount. That works out to almost <strong>$250,000 for every single American</strong> and about <strong>$650,000 for every American household</strong>. <br /></p></blockquote><p>And when you question them on this, when you are unrelentingly focused on getting the question answered &quot;and who is going to pay for all this?&quot;, Progressives have no answer.&nbsp; Oh sure, they prevaricate that the rich will pay for it (where the top 1% already pay 40% of all income taxes even as they only earn the 22% of the income) - even as that $76 Trillion works out to be every single penny of the entire nation's GDP (approx $14 Trillion/yr) for 5.4 years.&nbsp; </p><p>That ain't (and CAN'T) happen - you can tax 100% of everything away from everyone and every business and those GOVERNMENT processes (made by both clueless and power-greedy politicians) and the shortfall still can't be made up.&nbsp; EVAH!<br /></p><p>Once again, what the Progressives are pitching for an end game (and make no mistake - it is complete socialism via Government control (if not direct ownership) of society) will come to a complete fall off the cliff.</p><p>Ask them this question: what are you going to say to all those people YOU have made dependent on government for their very being when the money runs out?</p><p>My take?&nbsp; Weaning people off government dependence is the answer and returning to what de Toqueville called America's best feature: self-responsibility and individualism.&nbsp; Too many things become politicized once government has touched anything and all Government money comes with strings.&nbsp; </p><p>The example has already been set forth: are you a Katrina victim or a Mid-West flooding survivor? self-reliance is the key - which do you choose to be?&nbsp; What is it that you want your family to learn? </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Determined Weakness - no money, no power</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/determined_weakness_no_money_no_power.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5198" title="Determined Weakness - no money, no power" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5198</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-18T05:14:25Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-18T08:49:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Stunning - simply stunning:President George W. Bush still holds the record for the most debt run up on his watch: $4.9 trillion. But it took him over four years to rack up the first two trillion dollars in debt. It...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Obama Administration" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Stunning - simply stunning:</p><blockquote><p>President George W. Bush still holds the record for the most debt run up on his watch: $4.9 trillion. <strong>But it took him over four years to rack up the first two trillion dollars in debt.</strong> </p><p><strong>It has taken Mr. Obama 421 days.</strong></p></blockquote><p>When the money runs out, the end result is Banana Republic status for the USA.&nbsp; Obama is certainly #1 in leading the way.... </p><p>(H/T: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20000576-503544.html" target="_blank">CBS</a> via <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/17/record-breaker-obama-runs-up-2-trillion-in-debt-in-421-days/" target="_blank">HotAir</a>) <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;Deem&quot; Them Voted Out Of Office</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/deem_them_voted_out_of_office.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5193" title="&quot;Deem&quot; Them Voted Out Of Office" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5193</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-17T18:08:47Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-17T18:44:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[If Paul and Carol &lsquo;Deem&rsquo; anything passed. &nbsp;If they allow the Senate bill to self execute. &nbsp;If they vote on anything that moves the Senate bill from the House, they have voted for everything in the Senate bill by default.&nbsp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri>www.granitegrok.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Anti-Americanism" />
            <category term="Corruption" />
            <category term="Healthcare" />
            <category term="Just Plain Stupid" />
            <category term="Meddling by Government" />
            <category term="Nanny State and Busybodies" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div><span><div><span>If Paul and Carol &lsquo;Deem&rsquo; anything passed. <span>&nbsp;</span>If they allow the Senate bill to self execute. <span>&nbsp;</span>If they vote on anything that moves the Senate bill from the House, they have voted for everything in the Senate bill by default.&nbsp; </span></div><div><span><div><span><span><span /><div><span><span>The President can then sign the Senate bill, while the side car dies in the Senate.<span>&nbsp; </span>Obama gets the corrupt hand out riddled, economy killing reform, and the House gets to swing in the breeze.<span>&nbsp; </span>And no, he doesn&rsquo;t give a damn about house democrats.<span>&nbsp; </span>Never did.<span>&nbsp; </span>They are beneath him.<span>&nbsp; </span>Useful idiots.<span>&nbsp; </span>A term that suits Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter quite nicely.&nbsp; </span></span></div><div><span><span /><div><span><span /><span><span><span /></span><div><span><span><span>And they can&rsquo;t claim to have not voted for the Senate bill because that bill cannot leave the house without their authority, regardless of how they execute that authority; or more to the point how they abrogate their authority to stop it.<span>&nbsp; </span>A parliamentary trick still requires a vote. <br /></span><span><span>&ldquo;Self execute&rdquo; has such an ironic ring to it.&nbsp; </span></span></span></span></div><div><span><span><span><span /></span></span><div><span><span><span><span /></span></span><div><span><span><span><span /></span></span><span><span><span><span>So why don't we just 'deem' them impeached, retired, or simply voted out of office?</span><span> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Note:<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span> </span>If Hodes and Shea-Porter get the boot in November, their pensions and Health Care won&rsquo;t have vested.<span>&nbsp; </span>No taxpayer-dollars-for-life if you have not put in at least five years of service in congress.&nbsp; If that's not an incentive what is?</span></p><span><span><p class="MsoNormal"><span /></p></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></div></span></div></span></div></span></span></div></span></div></span></span></div></span></div></span></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Gordon Humphrey- &quot;This is Tyranny&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/gordon_humphrey_this_is_tyranny.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5191" title="Gordon Humphrey- &quot;This is Tyranny&quot;" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5191</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-17T17:49:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-17T17:53:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey spoke at the Hands off Healthcare rally last night in Rochester. Here is what he had to say and below the video is an article from Foster's reporter Adam Krause. &nbsp;Hands off Health Care rally draws...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Hemingway</name>
        <uri>http://GraniteGrok.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Healthcare" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey spoke at the Hands off Healthcare rally last night in Rochester. Here is what he had to say and below the video is an article from Foster's reporter Adam Krause.</p><p align="center"><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iZYXGn_-WN0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iZYXGn_-WN0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> </p><p align="center">&nbsp;</p><div id="articletextheader">Hands off Health Care  rally draws fiery crowd in Rochester</div>  	By <a href="mailto:akrauss@fosters.com">Adam D. Krauss</a><br />akrauss@fosters.com   	<div id="articletextsize"><strong>Wednesday, March 17, 2010</strong></div><br /><table width="250" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" bordercolor="#111111" border="0" align="right" style="border-collapse: collapse">       <tbody><tr>         <td style="width: 250px"><br /> 		     		     	    </td></tr></tbody></table> 		     		 		  		  		        ROCHESTER &mdash; After a fiery speech slamming the Democrats' health care legislation, a hush fell over the crowd as former U.S. Sen. Gordon Humphrey prepared to read from the Declaration of Independence. <br /><br />He had been railing against the &quot;growing lawlessness and tyranny on the part of those in Congress,&quot; the threat posed by the legislation and the &quot;Chicago-style politics and King George-style tyrants&quot; ruining the land.<br /><br />By now some in the crowd, who had come out for a &quot;Hands Off My Health Care&quot; rally, were at the edge of their seats, and the former senator had been speaking with such force he was eliciting shouts of &quot;Amen!&quot; from the audience.<br /><br />&quot;Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,&quot; Humphrey read from the Declaration before sending a message to President Barack Obama. <br /><br />&quot;We will not consent, Mr. President! We will not consent!&quot;<br /><br />The crowd of about 100 couldn't withhold its approval any longer. Across the function hall of the city's Elks Lodge, chairs began to get pushed aside as people got on their feet, whistling and hollering and clamoring for more from this two-term Republican senator, who served from 1979 to 1990. <br /><br />He had promised them he wouldn't hold back. <br /><br />&quot;Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to say some things today that you wouldn't expect to hear from a former United States senator but these are dark times,&quot; he said at the outset of his remarks. &quot;These are dangerous times. These are, as it was once said 250 years ago, times that try men's souls.<br /><br />&quot;They're being tried! We're going to try them in the end!&quot;<br /><br />Humphrey evoked the strongest reaction of the night among the speakers, which included House candidate Frank Guinta, Senate hopeful Ovide Lamontagne, Seacoast businessmen and possible House contender Sean Mahoney, gubernatorial candidate John Stephen, Sen. Jeb Bradley and local businessman Fenton Groen, who confirmed he's again running for state Senate. <br /><br />Humphrey referred to his audience as participants in the &quot;Tea Party revolution,&quot; and heralded the courage and patience they have shown. <br /><br />&quot;Does Washington pay any attention to you?&quot; he asked. <br /><br />&quot;No!&quot; the audience yelled. <br /><br />&quot;They ridicule you, they ... question your patriotism, your sanity,&quot; he said. &quot;But thank god for each one of you. You've changed minds of a lot of American people.&quot;<br /><br />Just not those in Congress, he added. <br /><br />&quot;They are determined to shove this Frankenstein monster, so-called reform, this misguided, dangerous ... madness down our throats whether you're liking it or not and you're not liking it and you will not abide by it,&quot; he declared.<br /><br />And with that, the crowd bellowed once more, &quot;Amen!&quot;    <p align="left">&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Our greatest treasure is freedom - the absence of restraints on our ability to think and to act</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog/2010/03/our_greatest_treasure_is_freedom_the_abs.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://granitegrok.com/blog-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5192" title="Our greatest treasure is freedom - the absence of restraints on our ability to think and to act" />
    <id>tag:granitegrok.com,2010://1.5192</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-17T16:59:15Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-17T17:05:47Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Dear President Obama,&quot;We The People&quot; have stated resolutely we reject your vision for our country. You claim you have not heard us. &quot;We The People&quot; have assembled across America resisting your efforts to subvert our constitution and undermine our liberty....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Skip</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Freedom" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://granitegrok.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dear President Obama,<br /><br />&quot;We The People&quot; have stated resolutely we reject <strong>your </strong>vision for our country. </p><p>You claim you have not heard us. &quot;We The People&quot; have assembled across America resisting your efforts to subvert our constitution and undermine our liberty. You claim you have not seen us.<br /><br />Since you have not acknowledged our message, let us here present it once more for if, as President Wilson said, a leader's ear must ring with the voices of the people, the time has come.<br /><br /><strong>Our greatest treasure is freedom - the absence of restraints on our ability to think and to act</strong>.&nbsp; The corollary of freedom is individual responsibility.&nbsp; We believe in the power of the individual. <br /></p><p align="center"><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JVAhr4hZDJE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JVAhr4hZDJE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p><p>A few years ago, President Bush said, &quot;History moves toward freedom because the desire for freedom is written in every human heart.&quot; Let us add that we will preserve it only as long as devotion to freedom is expressed in the heart of our actions. <br /><br />When President Lincoln dedicated Gettysburg National Cemetery he declared, &quot;It is for us the living...to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus so nobly advanced.&quot;&nbsp; That unfinished cause for which our soldiers willingly go to battle and for which so many have given their lives is a&nbsp; free United States of America.&nbsp; It has been nearly one hundred fifty years and the work President Lincoln spoke of is not finished.&nbsp; In fact, that work will never be finished.<br /><br /><strong>Freedom is the capacity for self-determination</strong>.&nbsp; It is not an entity but a condition, and conditions change.&nbsp; Freedom can expand, yet so can it contract. You promised change when you took office, Mr. President, <strong>but subjugation is not change we wanted or will accept</strong>.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br />You have expanded government, violated our constitution, confounded laws, seized private industry, destroyed jobs, perverted our economy, curtailed free speech, corrupted our currency, weakened our national security, and endangered our sovereignty.&nbsp; By compromising our nation's cultural, legal, and economic institutions, you are ensuring that our children will never achieve the same quality of life as we enjoy today.&nbsp; Through generational theft you are robbing the unborn of opportunity. <br /><br /><strong>This is not acceptable</strong>.&nbsp; Not in America. <strong>We did not become a strong nation through hope but rather through self-reliance.<br /></strong><br />No one better understands the relationship between individual achievement,dignity and strength than our armed forces. Through every war, our soldiers, have held this nation's destiny in their hands. They have not failed us. They cherish freedom enough that they are willing to die for it.&nbsp; <strong>Our duty to them and to ourselves is to treasure freedom enough to live up to it.</strong><br /><br />We accept the challenge, Mr. President.<br /><br />That is why we are assembling across the land to deliver our message to you as often and in every way we can.&nbsp; <strong>Dismiss us at your political peril</strong>.<br /><br />Our great nation is a Republic.&nbsp; <strong>We will not accept tyranny under any guise</strong>.&nbsp; Your policy to redistribute the fruits of our labor <strong>is Statism and will not be tolerated</strong>. By our honor, Mr. President, <strong>we vow forever to resist coercive government in America</strong>.&nbsp; Patriots will not stand silent as you attempt to dismantle the greatest nation on earth.&nbsp; &quot;We The People&quot; will defend our liberty, we will protect our beloved country and America's exceptionalism will prevail.<br /><br />God Bless the United States of America!<br /><br />Sincerely, <br /><br />&quot;We The People&quot; <br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

